NI VBAI GigE Camera Lost Packets

We are running VBAI on a fast PC through an Intel Pro/1000 card and a jumbo-frame GigE switch to a large number of Basler Ace GigE cameras.
It is understandable that multiple cameras can not simultaneously transfer complete images to the PC at the full 1000 MHz data rate due to the limited bandwith between the PC and switch.
One way around this is to throttle the max data rate for each camera down so that the sum is not greater than 1000 MHz.
However, this means that image transfers always take longer, even if only one camera happens to be in operation much of the time.
Is this a fundamental limitation of GigE Vision, or are GigE Vision cameras clever enough to operate as fast as possible...via resends of the occasional lost packet??? 
     Nelson

We have come up with a solution.
The issue is that the cameras, switch, network card, and VisionBuiilder cannot handle any instance where more than one camera is sending images to VisionBuilder where the total of the data rates for those cameras is ever in excess of the 1GB network card bandwidth.
(It would be nice if someone made a network switch that has slightly more packet buffer memeory...100MB?...so that the occasional collision does not result in garbage images while allowing most captures to operate at maximum speed.)
Solution:
(1) We added 3 additional 1Gb network ports to our vison pc.
(2) In order to redistribute camera traffic to more than one network port, we assigned each network card, and the corresponding cameras, to a different subnet.
(3) We lowered the data rate for the less time-critical cameras.
Even after lowering the data rates for several cameras in NI-MAX down to 200 Mb/s such that lost packets should no longer be possible, we stil saw them.
After a detailed examination we found that the VisionBuilder image acquisition steps do not pay attention the the data rates that you assign in NI-MAX, and alwasy default to the maximum 1000 Mb/s rate, hence the saturated data rates and lost packets.
The solution to this problem turns out to be to explicity set the desired data rate in each VisionBuilder Image Acquistion step, using the attributes tab.  While you are at it, you should also check that other critical parameters, such as the packet size, are also correct, and update them if not.
After explicitly correcting the data rates in all image acquisition steps, we ran an image capture stress test that ran all the vision processes (several programs running simultaneously) about 10x faster than required, and observed no lost packets at all.
Problem solved.
 

Similar Messages

  • VBAI GigE and Modbus must use common NIC?

    Hi,
    I cannot find any way to use separate NIC for GigE and Modbus TCP/IP in VBAI. VBAI insists on using wich ever adapter the GigE camera is using.
    Any one that can help me?

    EDIT: Here is what I see. Note that this is what I see from the computer running my Modbus Master server. The computer that is running VBAI has IP Address 192.168.0.110. I see a ton of reference to this IP under the Foreign Address column, but the status is FIN_WAIT_2 (I don't know what this means). My other Modbus devices work properly and use IP addresses 192.168.0.1, 192.168.0.2, etc.
    Proto Local Address Foreign AddressState
    TCP 0.0.0.0:135 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
    TCP 0.0.0.0:445 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
    TCP 0.0.0.0:3389 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
    TCP 0.0.0.0:5800 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
    TCP 0.0.0.0:5900 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
    TCP 127.0.0.1:1048 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
    TCP 127.0.0.1:1171 127.0.0.1:1172 ESTABLISHED
    TCP 127.0.0.1:1172 127.0.0.1:1171 ESTABLISHED
    TCP 127.0.0.1:1173 127.0.0.1:1174 ESTABLISHED
    TCP 127.0.0.1:1174 127.0.0.1:1173 ESTABLISHED
    TCP 127.0.0.1:5152 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
    TCP 127.0.0.1:5152 127.0.0.1:2703 CLOSE_WAIT
    TCP 172.16.3.87:139 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
    TCP 172.16.3.87:2906 74.125.225.149:443 TIME_WAIT
    TCP 172.16.3.87:2997 74.125.225.149:443 ESTABLISHED
    TCP 172.16.3.87:3016 208.85.40.20:80 TIME_WAIT
    TCP 172.16.3.87:3033 74.125.225.149:443 ESTABLISHED
    TCP 172.16.3.87:3034 8.27.81.126:80 CLOSE_WAIT
    TCP 192.168.0.254:139 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
    TCP 192.168.0.254:2910 192.168.0.1:502 ESTABLISHED
    TCP 192.168.0.254:2911 192.168.0.2:502 ESTABLISHED
    TCP 192.168.0.254:2912 192.168.0.4:502 ESTABLISHED
    TCP 192.168.0.254:2913 192.168.0.9:502 ESTABLISHED
    TCP 192.168.0.254:2915 192.168.0.200:502 ESTABLISHED
    TCP 192.168.0.254:2999 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3001 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3002 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3003 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3004 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3005 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3006 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3007 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3008 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3009 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3010 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3011 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3012 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3013 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3014 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3015 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3017 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3018 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3020 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3021 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3022 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3023 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3024 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3025 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3026 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3027 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3028 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3029 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3030 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3031 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3032 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3035 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3036 192.168.0.110:502 FIN_WAIT_2
    TCP 192.168.0.254:3037 192.168.0.110:502 ESTABLISHED
    UDP 0.0.0.0:445 *:*
    UDP 0.0.0.0:500 *:*
    UDP 0.0.0.0:4500 *:*
    UDP 127.0.0.1:123 *:*
    UDP 127.0.0.1:1025 *:*
    UDP 127.0.0.1:1049 *:*
    UDP 127.0.0.1:1072 *:*
    UDP 127.0.0.1:1154 *:*
    UDP 127.0.0.1:1900 *:*
    UDP 127.0.0.1:2637 *:*
    UDP 172.16.3.87:123 *:*
    UDP 172.16.3.87:137 *:*
    UDP 172.16.3.87:138 *:*
    UDP 172.16.3.87:1900 *:*
    UDP 192.168.0.254:123 *:*
    UDP 192.168.0.254:137 *:*
    UDP 192.168.0.254:138 *:*
    UDP 192.168.0.254:1900 *:*

  • GigE camera - grab image with black bars

    Hi everyboby,
    I am using Ni vision acquisition to grab images from a GigE camera.
    I recieve images just as I trigger the camera - so fare so good.
    Every other picture shows some black bars.
    Does anyone has an idea what it could be?
    It's not the hardware, the camera works perfect with the SDk form the manufacturer.
    Thanx for any help
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Sounds like an incomplete frame, this could be caused by missing packets.  To prevent missing packets during acquisition you can do two key things: ensure the packet size configured on the camera does not exceed what the network adapter can handle, and ensure that the bandwidth of image data being output by the camera does not saturate interface bandwidth.  I would lower camera packet size to 1500 initially to determine if the packet size  is the cause of the problem.  You can throttle how much data the camera can send by manipulating the interpacket delay, some manufacturers have a very handy feature called StreamBytesPerSecond.  Depending on which mechanism you can use, increase interpacket delay or reduce StreamBytesPerSecond.

  • I  want to make sure: Send/Recve Errors and Lost Packets on Ping - HOW BAD?

    Greetings!
    Still relatively new to MBP and Mac OS - ramping up fast on account of having to troll Forums for info about MBP's not so reliable WiFi performance...
    *ANOTHER QUESTION:* I get a lot of Send and Receive errors - as monitored by Network Utility.app when on my wireless network. Actually 10-20 after just 1/2 hour of WiFi activity. Going thru a Linksys WRT54GL router into a HughesNet satellite modem. AND, if I PING another device on my wireless network, I often get LOST PACKETS. All an indication that at least in my case - and I hear the same many Forums denizens complain about similar issues.
    N*ow, as I download important stuff* through the wireless network - say, the current many updates/upgrades for Mac OS X and the MBP, do such occurrences render the downloads unreliable? I do not get any message of incomplete download or such as Install such wirelessly downloaded upgrades, but I am concerned about applying upgrades which would have been damaged by such xmission errors. OR, perhaps errors are flagged and "corrected" somehow??
    Meanwhile, I have recently started to download -especially upgraged - via a direct LAN connection between my MBP and the satellite modem. However, seems to be a setback to me, especially since my most mundane among my Win machines have no trouble communicating over the wireless network.
    I'll appreciate assistance!
    - Roger T

    I don't know about wireless, as I only have dial up. And I have an iBook and not a MBP. But I frequently lose internet connection part way through a software update, probably due to the local antiquated phone lines. About all that happens is that the download has to be done over completely. It never picks up where it left off, so I assume the partial download is just gone as if it had never been downloaded. I would guess the same would be true of wireless downloads.
    Good luck!

  • Trying to detect GigE camera(TM-​1405GE) in MAX

    My company recently bought a new camera.  It is the TM-1405GE by pulnix.  This camera is a GigE camera and I have already installed the software that comes with the camera and can aquire images with that software.  My problem is that when I try to use labview or MAX I cannot detect the camera.  Under the software section of MAX it says I have IMAQdx software but under the Devices and Interfaces folder there is no NI-IMAQdx Devices tab.  I have also tried just righting a simple VI using IMAQdx to aquire an image but the camera isn't being detected.  Any suggestion would be much appreciated.

    Well, MAX is the place to look for the cameras.
    We had issues with Dalsa cams and I kept nagging with the local reseller until it was fixed. The problem was that the camera wasn't fully GigE compliant, the same be with yours.
    See here for more info
    Maybe you have to switch the camera for another software backend?
    Ton
    Free Code Capture Tool! Version 2.1.3 with comments, web-upload, back-save and snippets!
    Nederlandse LabVIEW user groep www.lvug.nl
    My LabVIEW Ideas
    LabVIEW, programming like it should be!

  • Multiple channels from GigE camera

    Hello NI Folks,
    I am using a GigE camera for my Machine Vision application. I have to save data from all three channels coming out of Camera.
    I am using Example VI from National Instruments 'Grab and Setup attributes.vi' to get attributes and save Image. But the problem is this example VI has capability only to grab data from one channel. Anyone please give an idea for Which part of thIS example VI should I edit to grab all the three channels ??
    I checked this issue even in MAX. I selected all three channels in MAX and tried to take a snap from camera, but there is only one image captured, there is no option in MAX to view all three channels. I am attaching the MAX scrrenshot below which shows all the channels from my GigE are activated
    How to make Labview to read all the three channels from camera ??
    Regards
    Neo.

    Hello Mr.Alexander Glasner,
    This is the camera I am using
    http://www.automationtechnology.de/cms/index.php?id=243&L=1
    It is used for Laser triangulation technique. this camera gives out  3D data in one channel, Intensity data in other channel, grey scale Image in third channel. All these these channels comes out ofcamera through a single Gigabit Ethernet.Camera manufacture provided a software with which streaming of desired channels is possible. But I want to do it in Labview. Is there any block in IMAQ library to isolate these channels from GigE Interface ?
    My point with MAX is, MAX is able to grab all the attributes including its channels names DC0,DC1,DC2. But it is not able to display three channels seperately when selected.
    Regards
    Neo

  • Problems acquiring and saving multiple camera images using a switch with GigE cameras

    Hi Folks,
    We are having an issue with connecting 6 GigE cameras via an Ethernet switch. We can acquire and store individual cameras but once we increase the number of cameras we end up with jumpy avi files.
    Each camera has been physically labelled and attached to the switch, so camera 1 is attached to port 1, which then corresponds to Cam1 in MAX. When recording multiple files what appears to happen is that the avi file from cam1 actually has images from multiple cameras, as if cam1 is being renamed/allocated on each frmae and each time a different camera is allocated. How can we fix this?
    We are new to this so any help or advice would be much appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    Cathy
    Attachments:
    Camerad.png ‏60 KB
    Camera.vi ‏91 KB

    I think your problem is caused by using the same image name on each instance of Imaq create. "Grab and Save to AVI Acq" being the string you are using. I am pretty sure If you make each image name unique you wont get image referance problems.
    Senior Software Engineer
    www.Adansor.com

  • Wifi issue lost packet

    Hello,
    I have upgrade my new macbook air to Moutain Lion and now i have a problem with wifi.
    I can't down file.
    I lost packet !!!!
    Olivier

    I am having the same problem.
    The only short term fix I have found is to Force Quit Finder (press Alt + Cmd + Esc, or go to menu bar Apple Logo -> Force Quit then select Finder and click Force Quit). Finder then quickly restarts and I am able to reconnect to my WiFi.
    I was hoping the latest update, OS X 10.7.1, would have resolved this but unfortuately it has not. I hope Apple can resolve this issue quickly.
    Dan
    p.s. I can't confirm that this problem only occurs when my mac goes to sleep during a Time Machine back up, simply becuase I have not checked for this. I will try and check and report back.

  • Gige Camera slow initialization

     I 'm using a Aviiva EM1 GigE camera with Labview 2011. I insalled the latest Imaqdx driver. I can acquire without problems images. However the initialization of the camera takes about 38 sec with Max or Imaqdx Open. When using Gevplayer (Pleora) it takes only 10 seconds. What can I do to speed up the initialzation in Labview ?
    Regards

    Hey,
    how about your network settings and all. have you enabled Jumbo frames? If yes, then there must be an incompatiblity of both ev2 and LabVIEW.
    Sasi.
    Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer
    If you can DREAM it, You can DO it - Walt Disney

  • Triggering a GigE camera

    Newbie question for you all.  Hope this makes sense:
    At the moment, we are using a Dalsa area scan camera and a NI PCI-1424 frame-grabber with a parallel digital interface.  We use LabVIEW and IMAQ software.  Our software creates an IMAQ session that sits and waits for a single external trigger on the PCI-1424 board.  When it receives the trigger, we acquire a series of frames at a given frame rate.
    Now we want to upgrade the whole system and are considering a GigE camera from Basler (Pioneer piA640-210gm).   If decide to do this, how would we configure the triggering? 
    I noticed that NI's GigE board (PCIe-8231) does not have any trigger inputs.  So I guess the only way to trigger the acquisition is to use the camera's trigger input?  But that doesn't even seem possible.  The user manual on the camera indicates that external triggering is used when you have a pulse train that triggers every frame.  We want the camera to wait for just one rising-edge which then triggers a pre-determined acquisition that is setup in the software.  Any ideas how to do that with GigE?
    Also, we use NI-IMAQ software right now.  If we upgrade to GigE, then we are going to have to totally re-write our software to use NI-IMAQdx, right?
    - John

    Hi John,
    With Firewire and GigE cameras the triggering is generally* done on the camera rather than the interface into the PC. The reasoning is that the interfaces into the PC do not have low-latency, deterministic methods to trigger the camera except via a separate external trigger wire linking the PC and camera. (*With Firewire since you are bound to the distance limits of the bus, it is generally easy to make this connection than GigE). NI does sell products like the 8255R (a firewire interface combined with reprogrammable I/O suitable for use with triggering cameras via an external cable, but there is no device that combines this functionality with GigE ports (but no reason why you can't combine with a separate GigE network card). However, as I'll desribe below, GigE Vision has its own tricks that reduce/eliminate the need for this...
    With the triggering moved to the camera, it is up to the camera vendor to decide the complexity the triggering methods they implement. On GigE Vision cameras, because they use GenICam XML files to allow the cameras to self-describe their features, any capabilities the camera manufacturer can dream up will be exposed through the driver. We are starting to see GigE cameras on the market with very complex triggering capabilities (including built-in pulse-generation capabilities, complex input and output interactions, etc) that can rival features on many framegrabbers. You can configure all of these features within MAX or your application just like you can control any other feature of the camera. Note that while there is flexibility to implement any feature desired, there is a "Standard Features Naming Convention" that, among other things, includes complex triggering definitions. This list aims to ensure that cameras that implement the same features (such as common triggering modes) use the same names and behavior for their features.
    As to whether the Basler Pioneer will support what you want, I am unsure. I checked the triggering capability here: http://www.baslerweb.com/downloads/17785/pioneer_manual.pdf. According to their docs, they support an "AcquisitionStart" trigger, meaning you should be able to trigger the start of a single-frame, multi-frame, or continuous acquisition when that trigger comes in (and the source can be varied, including external I/O pins). However, I tried this on a Basler Scout that we have and only a single frame was generated in this mode when triggered via a software trigger. Its possible I have an earlier firmware that is behaving incorrectly, but in theory the Basler camera should be able to do what you want if they named it correctly. I would confirm the expected behavior with Basler to be certain. As I mentioned, there should be plenty of other cameras on the market that do support this triggering mode if the Basler does not.
    With regards to re-writing your software for IMAQdx, its true that you would have to make the translation from IMAQ code. However, the API's are very similar for most things and code porting shouldn't be too bad.
    Please let me know if you have any more questions regarding this,
    Eric G

  • Triggering GigE Camera with Hardware Trigger

    Hello,
    Here is an outline of what I want to accomplish:
    -LabView program starts running and waits for GigE camera to output frames
    -Hardware trigger leads to GigE camera outputting frames
    -Some simple arithmetic is done on each frame to generate the average pixel value--> this average value is plotted for each frame
    -Repeat the above three steps
    Please see the attached VI. I have successfully set my camera's settings in MAX to make it wait for an external hardware trigger. However, the output of IMAQdx Grab2.vi inside the While Loop is only a single frame (even though in MAX I have set the Acquisition Mode to MultiFrame - 255 Frames).
    Any help would be appreciated!
    Thank You.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    ImageGrab.vi ‏57 KB

    The "problem" that you are having is the frame rate of video acquisition, which you think is about 20 Hz.  Take the very simple VI I posted and run it with your camera -- all it does is continuously take frames (and display them) -- does this have an acceptable rate?  I suspect it will.
    If so, then "start with what works and add to it", rather than trying to "fix what is broken".  First, let's consider how to (better) control the Start and Stop of frame acquisition.  I like your idea of using the 6009, but I recommend (if you are using a 3V signal as the trigger) that you wire the trigger to one of the Digital I/O ports (as 0 and 3V are acceptable TTL levels for False and True).
    Your Video loop will be "clocked" by the Camera at its frame rate, so you might consider using the same loop to clock the DIO.  Take a Digital sample of the line to which you've wired your TTL signal, and as long as it is True, run the loop.  [You'll need to think about how to get the loop started ...].  It should, I think, be possible to read from your USB 6009 within a 60th of a second -- if it is too slow, there are other ways of handling this with a separate parallel loop, but let's not go there until we see it is a problem.
    So now, in principle, you've gone from a simple loop showing frames at 60 Hz to a loop controlled by a TTL signal showing frames at 60 Hz.  All we need now is to process those frames.
    Here is where you want to use a Consumer/Producer pattern -- you don't want to do processing inside this loop (because the loop cannot run faster than all of its parts, taken together, and if you are processing incoming data, you have to get the data, then do the processing).  Instead, you have have two loops running in parallel -- the Producer loop acquiring the videos, and then "exporting" them to a Consumer loop that processes them.
    Are you familiar with this pattern?  There are numerous examples around (look in File/New/From Template/Framework/Design Patterns, and at some of the Sample Projects).  It uses a Queue, with data put onto the Queue by the Producer and removed by the Consumer.  You might need to increase the number of buffers for your camera, but you should be able to do quite a bit of processing in 1/60 of a second.
    Bob Schor

  • Simultaneous capture with usb and gige cameras ?

    Hi,
    I am unable to capture (continuously) simultaneously from a USB and a GigE camera, is there a limitation in Labview ? Both cameras work if I use them one at a time. I am using Labview 2012. Both cameras are IMAQdx devices and I am using IMAQdx VIs.
    Thanks,
    Best,
    Saumil

    I have just converted to low level, just in case. Not tested yet...
    USB camera: USB 2.0, 10 frames/sec, 1280x1024 -> about 13 MBytes/sec
    GigE camera: 300 frames/sec, 640x480 -> about 90 MBytes/sec
    So both cameras data rates are within their respective interface limits. Although when I started to archive raw frames from the USB camera, everything in labview became super slow. The slowness was reduced dramatically once I started storing to compressed AVI files (rates went from 15 Mbytes to approx. 1.5 Mbytes/sec). I have not tested  archival with the GigE camera yet, I am expecting troubles, just dont know how severe.
    Thanks for your help,
    Saumil

  • Hi my Gige Camera takes long time to acquire a single image

    Hi all,
               i need a help regarding . GiGe Camera iMage Acquization . it takes so long to acquire a image nealy 5000ms .
               I am usigng Sentech GE500A Gige Camera .
              i have attached my Vi code .
    Attachments:
    caemra.vi ‏97 KB

    Use Measurement Automation Explorer to verify that the camera integration time is not set to a really high value.
    Machine Vision, Robotics, Embedded Systems, Surveillance
    www.movimed.com - Custom Imaging Solutions

  • Testing iscsi and ocfs2: lost packets and freeze tests

    I have iscsi , ocfs2, asmlib installed on Centos4 (based upon j.hunter's article on building an iscsi/rac system). I am trying to confirm that these layers are functioning correctly and will not pose problems when clusterware/asm/rac is installed.
    What do you think of these test results?
    1. simultaneoulsly copying files from each node to the iscsi shared storage causes lots of lost packets and one of the 2 nodes will spend most of its time blocked by the other.
    2. Unplugging an ethernet cable causes the server to freeze after a few minutes. Plugging the cable back in does nothing to eleviate the hang problem.

    For performance, you need to tune your core network buffers and tcp network buffers (namely the [rw]mem_(default|max) and tcp_[rw]mem values. And you need to have a Gigabit network for such performance.
    For the hang situation, it looks like as if you are unplugging a SCSI device where it is not hot swappable. You can diagnose the problem using a serial console / netdump server / or Sysrq-w / Sysrq-T dumps.
    Ozgur Yuksel
    Enterprise Linux Support

  • GigE Camera File Error

    Hi all,
    Just got a new Hitachi KP-F83GV  GigE camera.  Listed on NI website as supported and current.  Running Labview 8.5.1 and IMAQdx 3.0.1  So here's my issue...
    I plugged the camera, fired up a small example program (below), and everything worked great! Just for kicks, I stopped the program and tried to start it again.  I get the following error: "NI-IMAQdx: (Hex 0xBFF69012) Attribute value is out of range."
    All I have to do to fix the problem, though, is reboot (unplug/replug power) the camera!  This is really annoying, though, as it's likely I'll be firing up multiple Labview programs in one sitting and it's a pain to have to power cycle after each test.
    Any idea why the attribute is only "out of range" on the 2nd/3rd/4th attempt and not the first?

    Aha - Labview 8.5.1 and IMAQdx 3.0.1 don't play nice.
    Labview 8.6.1 and Vision Acquisition 2009 are on their way... hopefully that will fix the problem.  I'll certainly be back if it doesn't

Maybe you are looking for

  • Sub Site Creation fails (works, but access is denied + autodelete)

    Hello, we have an upgraded from 2010 Sharepoint Sharepoint 2013 site, and i believe, since i pressed the "make it 2013" Button, normal users cannot create sub sites anymore. As an Admin, i can do this. As you can see in the Logfiles, the Site is crea

  • Any Adobe app won't start - clean install

    Hi there, My name is Andrea. I have a MAC MINI with two partitions. One with OS X 10.9.3 and the second with WIN7. On both I am running Adobe CC app. On MAC partition is working fine. On WIN7 I had an issue. At some point any applications I tried to

  • Is there an IM program to talk with msn cust. and use video for mac?

    i am new to mac and loving my computer, but almost all of my friends have hotmail. i was excited thinking i could finally video chat with them but cant seem to find an IM service that lets me talk with hotmail account owners and use my new macbook vi

  • Labview form inside HIQ

    I know I can use HIQ from inside Labview, but , can I use Labview or more specifically some VI from inside HiQ, in the sense HiQ->VI (Labview)->HiQ

  • Webutil - client_text_io.fopen

    Hi! I have a problem. My database charset is EE8ISO8859P2 (SELECT * FROM v$nls_parameters) and I use AS for 10g. I also installed webutil 1.0.6 and I call function client_text_io.fopen(p_file,'W','WINDOWS-1250'); When I write to file I use client_tex