"No brace at cursor to match" with MacOS X

Hi there,
I am having a problem with JDev code editor and MacOS X... it hapens in 9.0.3.x and 9.0.4.
When trying to close braces [], I can never get the ] caracter as I always get the error "No brace at cursor to match".
I am using spanish keyboard.
Any ideas on how to disable this checking?
Thanks,
Ignacio

Note: Do this First!
In addition to other possible problems and hassles with the 10.6.5 to 10.6.6 Server update, this same issue with AFP you referenced in your previous update may happen again with 10.6.6.
If shared folders are not appearing on client machines, be sure to stop, then start up, the AFP service in Server Admin before doing anything else. (Otherwise, you'll waste 4 valuable hours of your life like I did thinking that it was a permissions problem or some other complex issue possibly related to security changes and workgroup manager modifications).
Like many others running this server update, I also encountered the issue with the "update already in progress, please wait" upon the first attempt to run it. After waiting 6 hours, I rebooted our server and then used software update again. This time the update installed properly, but, apparently, AFP needs to be shut down and then restarted after the required reboot following the update install.
Thanks for posting previously otherwise I would have lost even more time!
It's not 5 PM, but I think I need some gin is in order.

Similar Messages

  • F_IT_01 does not match with FAGLGVTR

    Hello All,
    What is the reason for report  F_IT_01 not matching with FAGLGVTR
    Please advice

    Hello,
    I would not advise you to do such things in your environment.2 mins is very less time how could you be so sure a 2 min query is bad. And your second point is totally baseless it wouldtake a query a fraction of secondto read 1000 rows.My answer would be please
    dont implement.
    If you want to test below query might achieve the first requirement, I have not tested it please treat this query as hint and optimize or add anything if required.
    If you schedule this query through agent for every 2 mins or 5 mins .It can achieve.But some query takes more time to rollback than to finish scheduling this would lead to unstable environment
    USE MASTER
    IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM TEMPDB.SYS.ALL_OBJECTS WHERE NAME LIKE '#KILL_CONNECTION')
    BEGIN
    DROP TABLE #KILL_CONNECTION
    END
    CREATE TABLE #KILL_CONNECTION
    SESSION_ID INT
    ,TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME BIGINT
    ,START_TIME DATETIME
    INSERT INTO #KILL_CONNECTION
    SELECT
    SESSION_ID
    ,TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME
    ,START_TIME
    FROM SYS.DM_EXEC_REQUESTS
    WHERE TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME > 7200 AND SESSION_ID > 50
    DECLARE @SESSION_ID BIGINT
    DECLARE @CMD VARCHAR(1000)
    DECLARE KILL_CONNECTION CURSOR FOR
    SELECT SESSION_ID
    FROM #KILL_CONNECTION
    OPEN KILL_CONNECTION
    FETCH NEXT FROM KILL_CONNECTION INTO @SESSION_ID
    WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
    BEGIN
    SET @CMD = 'KILL ' + @SESSION_ID
    EXECUTE (@CMD)
    END
    CLOSE KILL_CONNECTION
    DEALLOCATE KILL_CONNECTION godrop table #Kill_connection
    Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

  • Some employees designations are not matching  with their actual designation

    Hi All,
    While downloading to excel sheet some employees designations are not matching  with their actual designations maintained in infotye 0001.
    Designations should match with infotype 0001.
    How to rectifty this issue.
    Let me know...
    Regards,
    Sita

    Hi
    Looks like you are dowloading the value from a field which does not contain the value you see in the infotype screen
    In infotypr 0001 place your cursor in the designation field.
    Press F1
    See the name of the field & the table.
    Have a look at the table using se16 and confirm what you see in the field is what you see in the infotype screen.
    If it is same see in your code if you are using correct field.
    If it is not the same trace in which table and field the value is stored and code your program to download from there.
    Check in Tables HRP1000 and PA0001 and you should get your values
    regards
    Pravin

  • CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

    Dear Members,
    The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
    System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
    In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
    I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
    Any help/clues?
    Regards
    Satya

    Hi,
    In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
    The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
    The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
    can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
    regards
    Waman

  • Receipt Qty in AP invoice does not match with actual receipt qty.

    Hello everyone,
    I am facing an issue in oracle Payables module. When we match invoice with receipt while preparing invoices, Quantity received shown in the Receipt quantity block in invoice window does not match with actual receipt quantity of that item. Due to this difference user is not able to book the invoice. Please help me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks,
    Himanshu Gupta

    Exactly. What i mean is in the invoice window, There is a block called reciept quantity shown in the lower part. The received quantity displayed in that block is more the actual quantity being recieved. (when we see the recieving transactions). is this a bug?
    thanks for your reply, awaiting your response......
    Himanshu Gupta

  • 0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

    Hi All
    We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
    R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)   with the
    Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
    But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table  which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
    Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
    FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
    Thanks
    KPK

    In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data. 
    Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
    Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report -  G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
    I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link.  Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
    Please advise ..
    Thanks
    KPK

  • R3 data not matching with BW

    Hi Experts,
    we have an issue here. We are using 2LIS_11_VAITM and 2LIS_11_VASCL to load SD data. We use the fields RFSTK and RFGSK in BW to filter out orders that are processed. Now we find that these fileds dont match with the ones in R3. At R3 side i looked at VBUK table and it indicates properly the status of the order.
    But in the BW side when we pull these the status fileds are not correct and they dont match R3 at all...How do i fix this.. Where can find or how can find from which table BW is actually pulling the information for these two fields.
    Please reply.
    DV

    Hi Anil,
    <b>How these fields were added to the ES of those DS ?</b>
    How do i check this?
    <b>Have you done any Customer Exit (append method) to get the values for these fields?</b>
    Iam not  sure, It was done formerly by someone.
    <b>If so, remember that we ca not get deltas that occured with the change to only appended fields of ES.</b>
    Does that mean the appended fileds dont work with Deltas.. they dont pick up the chnages??
    DV
    null

  • Inventory data not matching with R/3

    Hi,
    In R/3 production we have the data from 1999-Till date.From 1999-2004 Data was archieved in R/3 system.So we have two years live data in the R/3 production.
    We have filled the setup tables and extracted the Inventory data then loaded into 0IC_C03 Cube.
    But the values in BW report from 0IC_C03 is not matching with the values in R/3 report.
    1.What could be the reason?
    2.If we need to extract the archieved data from R/3 what are the steps we need to do?.
    Pls help us with your suggestions.

    We have followed as per the How to handle inventory managment document.
    The quanity value is matching between R/3 and BW.But the Valuated Stock Value is not matching for some of the materials.For the current period it showing the right value(for ex.if we check for 12th Month).
    But If we check the material for old months like October,Aug the value of valuated stock value is not matching with R/3 for some of the materials.
    In RSDV validity table date maintained from 1999-Dec'200.
    We are using the standard business content cubes and update rules.Is there any change needs to be done in update rules for 0IC_C03 cube to get the right values for all the materials?..
    Pls help with your inputs.
    Thanks
    Soujanya

  • Planning area data not matching with backup cube / PSA

    Hi friends,
    while loading data from planning area to backup cube , for the key figure ( result of a macro),the data in planning area is not matching with PSA as well as with cube.
    At the same time Data is matching at total level but not at disagregated level. And many times it disagregate in equal Proportion in cube/psa.
    Pls its urgent.
    Pts for sure.
    Vishal.
    9326179903

    make sure you have replicated the extraction of the data source. This is needed to ensure your backup cube gets the current data as in the planning area
    if you got to /SAPAPO/SDP_EXTR then you can see this button
    you can set this up as a program scheduled to run before the updation of your cube
    As for the disaggregation, test at what level you are choosing your characteristic? ( i suppose you can choose the level)
    Are you extracting at a detailed level or at the aggregated level
    Is your macro saving the data into a Keyfigure or is it an auxilliary KF or something?

  • Vendor aging unreconciled bal. does not match with TB Acct. Payable balance

    Dear all,
    When i take unreconciled vendor aging report with selection creteria all vendor codes selected,aging date as 31/03/09 and posting date from 01/04/08 to date 31/03/09,Interval - 30 Days,By Journal postings
    Deticked all check boxes in it.
    Aging report total balance of all vendor does not match with account payable balance in Trial balance ?
    But for reconciled aging totals and trial balance total are same.
    How to solve it ? or i need to do any settings ?
    Jeyakanthan

    Hai!
    What version of SAP B1 u r using.
    I do got the same problem for my  customer. I did this..
    1. Run Aging Report for all Vendors. Donot check Recon Transaction.
    2. Export to Excel
    3. Run TB for BP selecting Vendors alone.
    4. Export TB to Excel.
    5. Find vendors who is having mismatch in their balance. (use V-Lookup in Excel)
    6. Run Detail G/L Transaction report for those Vendors one by one.
             *Selection from date: Age from date To date: Age To date *
             *Selection Reconcilled Transaction only
    7. Report Balance should be Zero. If not this problem is because of Internal Reconcillation.
    8. Open *Check and Restore Previous reconcillation * select the vendor, internal
    9. see the reconcillation details.
    10. see the posting dates. All should be in previous fiscal year. (I mean the reconcilled set should have same fiscal year ex: Recon -2 trans should be in same fiscal year)
    11. If, that is corrected and still difference exist means.
    12.Go to Manage Previous Reconcillation
    13. Select BP and Internal (Donot check system reconcill Trans)
    14. Check the Reconcillation wheather all in same fiscal year.
    Regards,
    Thanga Raj.K
    +91 9710445987

  • GL - Balances do not match with sum of Items

    Hi,
    I have a requirement in which I am pulling opening, closing balance and a list of all transactions (or items ) on a daily basis from GL to a flat file, and then loading in a third-party tool . Now, the issue is sum of all items (gl_je_lines ) should match with the diference of closing and opening balances.
    I reconcilied the items with Oracle's Journal Report. Items are matching.
    I also confirmed that closing balance of previous day matches with the opening balance of current date.
    But, ( closing balance ) - (opening balance) does not match with sum(items)
    I am using gl_daily _balances for opening and closing balance.
    Waiting for your inputs/suggestions..
    Yogini

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply.
    I am not using GL_INTERFACE. The tables I am using for Daily balances are:
    gl_daily_balances
    gl_code_combinations
    chart_of_accounts
    And for the items, I am using gl_je_lines, gl_je_headers.
    Also, I am interested in Entered Amount in GBP as the Functional Currency is GBP and there are many transacitons in different foreign currencies.
    More updates : I found that I have calculate the Entered Amount in GBP from all Converted/Transferred/Entered amounts in different currencies.
    So, I tried the following :
    (Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
    from gl_daily_balances
    where Currency_code = 'GBP'
    and currency_type = 'U'
    and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
    MINUS
    ( Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
    from gl_daily_balances
    where Currency_code = 'GBP'
    and currency_type = 'C'
    and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
    This way, I got opening and closing balance, but still the differernce between opening and closing balance is not matching with the sum of Items.
    Any suggestions / inputs are highly appreciated.
    Yogini

  • Sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report

    Dear Gurus,
    Looking Ur assistance for an issue.
    Issue: For some of the sales orders Dispatch Actual No of pipes do not match with R3 report. Actual No of Pipes matches with LIKP table values in R3. Query needs to be modified to restrict records as per logic in WGSRLDES report/program.
    Can U help me in this Regard.
    Ur Responses are most appreciated.

    Hey Pathak,
                        The problem is, BI report is matching with the datails with R/3 LIKP table. But the business user is using Report WGSRLDES report/program, where the data is missmatching.
    Hope U got my Point.

  • GR/IR account G/L balance does not match with BSIS table

    Hi,
    I am preparing a report which uses table BSIS.But the total in the table does not match with the GR/IR G/L balance account.When I click on balance item display in FS10N the entries match with that of BSIS but the total is different.Also how to factor the year opening balance entries in the report.
    Thanks
    Arun

    But that will slow down the system considerabley, because BSEG contains a huge data

  • GR Value is not matching with PO Value while posting good receipt.

    Hi Experts,
    My client has raised the PO with accounts assignment category K (COST CENTRE) with material description.
    but he has received invoice receipt before good receipt.while invoice receipt he has entered wrong value for some qty as per PO intially and cancelled that wrong entry.
    I have gone through original & cancelled invoice document accounting entries. below is entries:
    Original invoice document accounting entries:
    GR/IR Clearing account: Debited
    Vendor account: Credited
    during cancelling the above document it should be vendor acc is debited and GR/IR account is credited but in the system below entries taken place
    Cancelled invoice document accounting entries:
    Vendor account : Debited
    GR/IR Account : Credited
    Consumption Account : Credited
    Why consumption acc taken place here. pls help what are the possibilitis....
    these entries affecting good receipt value means while taking goods receipt for some qty out of full qty value is not matching with PO value.
    but while cancelling the  GR documents system taking correct values as per PO. Please help.
    Kindly help in this regards
    Regards
    Mohan

    Hi,
    Check the Credit Memo document whether G/L tab is there & whether any G/L account is entered ?
    I think instead of cancelling the MIRO document they might have posted a vendor credit memo manually by specifying a consumption GL.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • HT2204 What is the best way to use iTunes Match with two Apple ID's that have purchased content?

    Hello. 
    In my early years of using iOS devices i have unwittingly made the mistake of creating a second Apple ID for my second device.  So now i have two Apple ID's with purchased content associated with them. 
    I have turned on iTunes Match with the account that has the bulk of my music linked to it.  But my second account has maybe 150-200 songs (and lots of apps) that i really like and don't want to loose.  Activating iTunes Match for the main account wiped these 150-200 songs off my iOS devices and replace them.  Is it possible to have content from both my apple id's on my devices at the same time?  Is it possible to combine the content from both of my accounts?

    I'll try to help a bit.
    ITunes match space is different to icloud space. With iTunes match you get storage for 25,000 non iTunes purchased tracks and other than a limit for individual file size, there is no memory limit.
    You can turn match on individuallyon each device (I have it turned off on my iPod but turned on on my iPad and iPhone). When you turn it on then you get access to all the tracks, and in my experience any playlists I create have transferred over very well. I understand that some people have had trouble with playlists though.
    I'm not quite clear with exactly what you mean regarding cleaning up your library, but be careful about using Match for this. There is no guarantee that matched songs will be exactly the same version as your own copy, due to some mismatches, so you could find some problems there. Personall, I am cleaning up my library before matching, but I am rather particular about keeping my library the way I want it. If you aren't as fussed then match could be the answer.
    Hope that helped.

Maybe you are looking for