No Withholding tax calculated when the work area is changed

Hi All
I have changed the work area in infotype 208 for an employee from OH to IL. Then i ran the payroll, but no withholding tax for IL was calculated. The employee residence area is IN.
Any inputs on why its not calculated ?
Regards
Vamsi

Hello Yogesh,
Thanks for your reply!!!
We have solved the issue.
the issue is really due to after 7.3 Upgradation the RSPC_MONITOR had two more new feilds added
1) UNAME & 2) CHECK_TIME
and this fields doesn't exist in the 7.0 Version so due to this inconsistancy the Structure was failing.
so we have included two new Fields in the structure in the program and in the Customer Exit and working fine now.
With Regards,
PJ.

Similar Messages

  • My iPad only has sound when the earphones are plugged in. The switch that controls the volume works then, but not when I take the earphones out. Suggestions?

    My iPad2 only has sound when the earphones are plugged in. The volume switch works then too, but not when I take the earphones out. Suggestions?

    it's a hardware issue
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1343532?start=315&tstart=0
    more here
    iphone stuck in headset mode

  • When I open an image in Photoshop, I cannot see the file.  The thumbnail in on the right, but I cannot see the image on the work area. I am using Windows 8

    When I open Photoshop CS6 I cannot view the image.  The thumbnail is visible on the right hand side and the work area shows the file information, but no image.  I have updated PS, my driver. It is the same for both jpg or RAW.

    Be sure your graphics drivers are up to date. Try disabling GPU acceleration in the preferences then restart Photoshop.
    Benjamin

  • My iPhone 4s refuses to play sound when the headphones are not in. When the headphones are in however, it works perfectly fine! This is most annoying, could someone please help me :)

    My iPhone 4s refuses to play sound when the headphones are not in. When the headphones are in however, it works perfectly fine! This is most annoying, could someone please help me   I have not dropped it and it has not been in any contact with liquid.

    I just tried both of those things and to no avail. Here are some pictures if that will help

  • Withholding Tax Calculation Error for Vendor Down Payment Clearing:Oct '09

    Hi,
    We are trying to incorporate the new Withholding Tax Structure w.e.f. 01-Oct-09.
    There were 3 scenarios possible:
    a. Invoice = Down Payment
    b. Invoice < Down Payment
    c. Invoice > Down Payment
    While 1 & 2 were taken care of effectively, the third scenario did not work as expected. The scenario is as follows:
    1. Down Payment (Date : 30/09/09)
    Amt : Rs. 40000/-;
    Withholding Tax @ 15% : Rs. 6000/- (40000 * 15%)
    Surcharge @ 10% : Rs. 600/- (6000 * 10%)
    Edu Cess @ 2% : Rs. 132 (Rs. 6600*2%)
    Higher Edu Cess @ 1% : Rs. 66 (Rs. 6600*2%)
    2. Invoice (Date : 02/09/09) - As per new TDS Rates
    Amt : Rs. 50000/-
    Withholding Tax @ 10% : Rs. 5000/- (50000 * 10%)
    Surcharge : NIL
    Edu Cess : NIL
    Higher Edu Cess : NIL
    3. DPC (Date : 02/09/09) - Reversal of TDS calculated in Down Payment (Step 1) above.
    Issue:
    While making J1INCHLN, amount is adjusted as Rs. -1000/- (hence zero) not payable.
    Also, the Surcharge, Edu Cess & Higher Edu Cess are also getting reversed in DPC.
    As suggested by SAP Note No. 1372734 - Handling of downpayment clearing scenarios after budget '09, the scenario does not seem to work.
    Actual payable should be worked out as under:
    Invoice : Rs. 50,000/-
    DP : Rs. 40,000/-
    Bal : Rs. 10,000/-
    TDS @ 10% : Rs. 1,000/-
    All TDS Challans, Certificates & Returns must reflect Rs. 1000/- in the Challan.
    Require assistance.
    Regards,
    Kapil Tilwani

    Hi Kapil,
    The following needs to be taken care of  -
    The message controls settings as the note suggests must be set as W.
    When entering the details the logic is Vendor Debit amount is Tax amount + 1
    The Vendor credit line, the tax code has to be assigned with the advance amount (amount for which the challan has been created) as the tax base amount and the tax amount will be the extra liability that needs to be created.
    In your example -
    The tax amount will be - 2000 ( the debit at the time of downpayment clearing should have been 4000 instead of 6000)
    Tax base amount -  40000 (Challan for this amount has already been made at the time of downpayment made)
    The vendor Debit - 2001 (2000 + 1)
    The vendor credit - 1
    Note - Tax amount and base amount has to be made manually in the withholding Tax tab for the credit entry.
    Please revert for any clarification.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Anit

  • Incorrect Withholding TAX Split when using Installment Payment term

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    When we are using installment payments, the withholding tax is split and calculated in as many vendor positions as the installment payment term dictates. In our location (ECUADOR) it is necesary to calculate the Withholding TAX adding all the vendor positions (PstKy - 31) and posting only one Withholding tax position. When we simulate the document, we get the next snapshot:
    001 31       0000100035                                                               0.00
    002 40       5201001001 Sueldos                                          1,000.00                                       60
    003 31       0000100035 RAMOS ANDRADE CARLO                             309.64-
    004 31       0000100035 RAMOS ANDRADE CARLO                             300.54-
    005 31       0000100035 RAMOS ANDRADE CARLO                             300.54-
    006 50       2401003003 10% Retención Profe                                          30.36-
    007 50       2401003003 10% Retención Profe                                          29.46-
    008 50       2401003003 10% Retención Profe                                          29.46-
    009 40       1301003001  IVA 12%                                           107.14
    And we shoul get the next one for our needs:
    001 31       0000100035                                                               0.00
    002 40       5201001001 Sueldos                                          1,000.00                                       60
    003 31       0000100035 RAMOS ANDRADE CARLO                             250,72- ==========> (Here is made the tax disccount)
    004 31       0000100035 RAMOS ANDRADE CARLO                             389,82-
    005 31       0000100035 RAMOS ANDRADE CARLO                             389,82-
    006 50       2401003003 10% Retención Profe                                          89,28- ==========> (Here is the 3 tax positions added)
    007 40       1301003001  IVA 12%                                           107.14
    Regards,
    Esteban Moreno
    SAP FI-CO consultant

    Hi Srikanth,
    Thanks for your suggestion.
    I am looking for way in which two accounting documents are created automatically by the system having the desired values. Due to huge number of customer invoices which will need this, it will not be possible to handle it manually and will leave a room for error due to manual intervention.
    If somehow we can configure this payment term in system, then it would really help
    Regards
    Harpreet

  • Withholding tax amount exceeds the customer/vendor line item amount 001

    Hi Guys,
    I am trying to release an invoice using VF02 transaction but I recieved the below error message:
    Message no. 7Q321
    Withholding tax amount exceeds the customer/vendor line item amount 001
    There are 2 SAP (718078 and 513201) notes regarding that but they are not applicable in ECC 6.0.
    How can I figure out this issue?
    Thanks,
    Daniel Dorta

    Hi,
    This may happen because you have give base exemption and after that charge tax. In this case you have posted earlier invoice w/o wht and now you are posting the small amount of invoice on which wht is calculated including the earlier exempt amt. In this case the wht exceeds the base amt.
    In this case if possible you first post the invoice with sufficient amount which can deduct the WHT .
    If your scenario is different give details.
    Regards
    Milind Sonalkar

  • Withholding tax amount exceeds the customer/vendor line item amount

    Hi experts
    I am having one problem please help me
    My user created one down payment, entry is like this
    Vendor Dr-193914
    To TDS     3878
    To Bank   190036
    After this he has booked MIRO  with the same value 193914 & has deducted TDS 3878 over that invoice
    Now when he is going to adjjust that down payment against that MIRO with specific line item 62
    system is throwing that error.
    Withholding tax amount exceeds the customer/vendor line item amount 002
    Message no. 7Q321
    I checked invoice booked correctly & TDS also dedcuted properly why system is throwing that error message
    please help me
    Regards
    Nitin Shukla

    Hi Madhu
    thanks  a lot for instant reply
    We are using F-54 Down Payment adjustment at this time we are facing problem & we are clearing against invoice
    & with specific line item
    For Eg. 5100001596  & line item - 53
    Regards
    Nitin Shukla

  • Withholding tax calculation @ Customer payment

    Hi
    Experts, can any one help me on this issue??. I want to calculate and post withholding tax for a customer at the time of incoming payment(F-28). I have already activated extended withholding tax, defined tax type, tax code, & assigned in the customer master data. But system not calculating the tax nor its displaying tax code in the payment screen, & throwing a message when I double click on the relevant tax column ie " withholding tax information missing from line item"  I f someone could throw a light on this, it would be a great help,
    Thanks in advance
    Hariharan.

    Kindly check
    1. Define witholding tax type for invoice posting
    IMG > Financial Account Global settings > Withholding tax > Extended Withholding Tax > Calculation > Withholding Tax type > <b>Define Withholding Tax Type for Invoice posting</b>
    2. Define witholding tax type for payment posting
    IMG > Financial Account Global settings > Withholding tax > Extended Withholding Tax > Calculation > Withholding Tax type > <b>Define Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting</b>
    and also check OBWW (Define account for w/h tax)
    rgds.

  • Assigning multiple withholding tax codes of the same witholding tax type

    As described in note 363650, I have configured a withholding tax type FE to include a range of withholding tax codes of 0% for US 1099 reporting only. I also carried out the conversion to extended withholding and resolved all errors. My requirement is that I need two different withholding tax codes of this type to be open and editable in MIRO and FB60. I am receiving error Message no. 7Q005 when I attempt to add another code of the same type.
    What is the best practice for configuring/recording withholding tax in this case?
    Example:
    Vendor XYZ
    Header amount of invoice: $1000.00
    Amount relevant for withholding tax type FE code 01: $600.00 (rents)
    Amount relevant for withholding tax type FE code 07: $400.00 (nonemployee compensation)
    Thanks in advance

    Thanks for the input. My problem occurs when attempting to assign the second tax code in the vendor master. The system doesn't allow for the second code of  the same type to be added.
    I can assign one code in the vendor master without issue, and all fields are editable in the withholding tax tab for the first code, both for invoicces and for payments.
    I have been offered one suggestion to configure a differrent range of codes with a new tax type. This would mean that if I had only one vendor relevant for 3 tax codes (rent, royalties, unemployee compensation) then I would have to configure two additional withholding tax types with all the codes associated with them. This doesn't seem like the best approach -- am I missing a setting or some other minor config to solve this?

  • How do you reset the Work Area Bar to auto adjust?

    This is something that's been a thorn in my side for a while. Maybe I'm just being OCD about it... but I've been wondering if there is a way, once you reposition the I / O points of the Work Area Bar (WAB) you can get Pr to go back to auto adjusting it to the end of your clip.
    You can double-click it to get it to expand to the full length of the sequence, if you remember to do that... Sometimes I'm in a rush, or I have 10 sequences and I miss the fact that my WAB is not all the way to the end. I select and batch drag them all to Media Encoder and *POW*... I've forgotten to stretch the Out to end on one sequence ... and I have to re-render. A pain, yes, something I should have double checked, but at 2am these things can get missed.
    So, can you get the Work Area Bar to auto adjust again?
    If yes, it's probably something ridiculously obvious – but I'll take it!
    Thanks
    Stephen

    I would have an issue with auto or a default  for a number of reasons.
    Not least this one...
    I now place dummy clip ( black video)  a  distance off the end of my sequence to prevent the End of Sequence Marker displaying at the end of my edited material.  I dont want that included in an export.
    Here is another...
    As I get to lock down and I am sending previews to clients...I insert Black Video head and tail of the edit so that the preview does not start  jarringly on first frame video.  I have I and Os marked so that I can simply  export "Program at length (without black head and tail) when I  come to master.
    and...
    Often I have edit versions (TVCs) on the same time line ( sequence) and I need to adjust WAB or I/Os to export them separately.
    Automating stuff to eliminate our dumb moments doesnt help much because it just opens the chance of another dumb moment driven by expectation and forgetfulness. .
    Mental checklist is the only way IMHO.

  • How to make the CTI respond to the work area again?

    Hello,
    i suddenly have a unusual problem (4 me). I  work on a project and i noticed today that the CTI dose not  act according to my work area when i RAM preview. After pressing 0 it just  goes after the end of the work area continuing to render
    . (green line)
    And also it does not start to render at the  beginning of the work area.  It uses somehow the comp's lenght...
    Please advise.
    Thanks!
    I attached a photo so you can see what is it about.

    If you leave "From current time" enabled, you can use 0 to audio preview from the current position or shift-0 to audio preview from the beginning of the comp.

  • Item & for schedule line & is in the work area

    Hi All,
    We added some custom fields on the schedule line tab and also in VBEP table. For thie same we also added code in the PBO module of SAPMV45A/4500 screen#. Since we added the code we are getting the error message# V1357 with description 'Item 000010 for schedule line 000040 is in the work area'.
    I did check the forum and found couple of notes with this error and some replies say that it is for the quality issue. I tried going to OQ77. But i am pretty sure it is because of what i codded. Because When i comment my code so error shows up. But I am not sure what is the problem with my code.
    Here is the sample of my code that i wrote in my PBO module:
        IF  XVBEP-VBELN IS NOT INITIAL.
            INPUT = MARA-BRGEW * XVBEP-WMENG.
            PERFORM CONVERSION.   "This is the module that i wrote to convert from G to LB.
            XVBEP-ZTOTALWT = OUTPUT.
            xvbep-updkz = 'U'.
            modify xvbep index ivbep-tabix.
        ENDIF.
    Please let me know if i am doing wrong anywhere in the code.
    Thanks,
    Karuna.

    Issue: I got the issue resolved. The mistake i made was the local structure was holding last item which has 1 schedule line and the my first item10 was having more than 1 schedule lines and trying to loop all the schedule lines. As the last item has only one schedule line i was getting the problem.
    Solution: I reset the structure to that it will loop from the first line item instead of it holding the last item#.
    Hope this helps.
    Karuna

  • How to stop PO output when the indicators are updated with a prog. **URGENT

    Hi,
    I have developed a update prg which will update the Final invoice indicator and Goods reciept indicator in SRM as well as in R/3 only for 'ORDERED' PO's. This was done using BBP_PO_PD_UPDATE FM. Everything is working fine, all the indicators are getting updated as expected both in SRM and R/3.
    Only problem is that when the indicators are updated in SRM, PO Output is getting generated which should not happen.
    Do you have any idea how to stop the OUTPUT.
    This is very urgent.
    BR,
    Parvez.

    PO output
    PO Output problems
    disable PO output on po change in SRM

  • F-04 Withholding tax calculation

    Dear All,
    In Tcode F-04 (Transfer Posting with clearing) i am using Posting key "31" for Vendor Credit AMount.
    Here, I am not able to calculate automatic withholding tax amount
    Withholding tax data is already maintained in the vendor's master data.
    Withholding tax calculation is possible with other Tcode like FB60...
    but  With F-04 it's not calculating.
    How to calulate withholding tax amount.
    It it something configuration problem .
    Pl suggest me some solution.
    Regards
    Swati

    For E.g
    My Client wants the system to calculate  Withholding Tax on purchase of Air Ticket from his Agent
    Travel expenses                                               xxxxx
    Vendor  - Air travel agent                                              xxxx
    Note 2 : WHT collected by the vendors on purchase of the air ticket and recorded as an asset for onwards claim from Tax Authority.
    The system simulates the following accounting entry: (Payment)
    Vendor                                                                                XXXXXX
                   WHT Asset**                                                                  XXXXXX
                   Bank                                                                               XXXXXX       
    In This Case this entry is not Correct . It should be
    Vendor                                                                                XXXXXX
                    WHT Asset                                                                                XXXXXX
                    Bank                                                                                XXXXXX 
    Hope you got my requirement
    Edited by: MAZ on Sep 27, 2010 3:18 PM
    Edited by: MAZ on Sep 27, 2010 3:56 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error while processing a response

    Hi, i have the next error while my class is processing the response. The error is: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError at com.bea.portal.appflow.servlets.internal.PortalWebflowServlet.doGet(PortalWe bflowServlet.java:214) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.se

  • Report Builder 3.0 and Report Parameters with Available Values - do a LIKE expression?

    I would like to write an expression based on a @Status parameter that includes the labels you see in the diagram.  My problem is that in the field Status - that includes these data results of Issued, Cancelled and Finaled - data entry is not consiste

  • ITunes not syncing with iPod in Windows 7 64 bit

    I installed the 64 bit version of iTunes 10.5 on my 64 bit version of windows 7 on my hp dv6 laptop. No matter what I do everytime I connect the ipod to the laptop, itunes always tells me I need to uninstall itunes and install the 64 bit version even

  • Mapping - Questions

    Hi,    I have few basic questions regarding mappings.    1)  I think we can do everything by using Graphical Mapping. Then what is the purpose for Java, XSLT and ABAP mapping? Please give me an example for this...    2) Which mapping will give better

  • How to disable the archive on re-do logs?

    Gurus: Please help with this. Thanks!