Nodemanager fails hostname verification check
does anyone know how i might resolve this issue?
[[NodeManager:300033]Could not execute command ping on the node manager. Reason: weblogic.nodemanager.NodeManagerException: [CommandInvoker: Failed to send command: 'ping to server 'null' to NodeManager at host: '10.32.33.2:5555' with exception [Security:090504]Certificate chain received from 10.32.33.2 - 10.32.33.2 failed hostname verification check. Certificate contained qa153 but check expected 10.32.33.2. Please ensure that the NodeManager is active on the target machine].]
Matthew Sacks <> wrote:
does anyone know how i might resolve this issue?
[[NodeManager:300033]Could not execute command ping on the node manager.
[[Reason: weblogic.nodemanager.NodeManagerException: [CommandInvoker:
[[Failed to send command: 'ping to server 'null' to NodeManager at host:
[['10.32.33.2:5555' with exception [Security:090504]Certificate chain
[[received from 10.32.33.2 - 10.32.33.2 failed hostname verification
[[check. Certificate contained qa153 but check expected 10.32.33.2.
[[Please ensure that the NodeManager is active on the target machine].]Hi,
- If you are using scripts:
you can use the following options in your
scripts: -Dweblogic.security.SSL.ignoreHostnameVerification=true
- If you want to use it from the adminserver:
Go to the adminserver in the console
Go to 'SSL'
Select 'Advanced'
Set 'Hostname Verification' to 'none'
And restart the adminserver.
cheers,
Bart
Schelstraete Bart
[email protected]
http://www.schelstraete.org
Similar Messages
-
Hello friends. The dns name of our server recently changed. Since that time,
nothing except the administration node will start up. Server logs reveal the
following information:
Certificate chain received from localhost - 127.0.0.1 failed hostname verification
check. Certificate contained COTHUBT but check expected localhost>
There is one trusted certificate that was added to the cacerts keystore. Does
it need to be removed and re added? Any other insight would be appreciated."brain" <[email protected]> wrote:
Try this if you're running version 8
In the admin node gui.
Click on machines
Click on the NodeManager tab for the machine that you are interested in.
Change hostname in listen address.
Bounce the app server
>
Hello friends. The dns name of our server recently changed. Since that
time,
nothing except the administration node will start up. Server logs reveal
the
following information:
Certificate chain received from localhost - 127.0.0.1 failed hostname
verification
check. Certificate contained COTHUBT but check expected localhost>
There is one trusted certificate that was added to the cacerts keystore.
Does
it need to be removed and re added? Any other insight would be appreciated. -
Failed hostname verification check - even when disabled
Hello Experts,
I'm using WLS 923 configured as Admin Server that controls two Managed Servers.
When i go to "Environment ---> Machines ---> Managed Machine ---> Monitoring ---> Node Manager Status
It says:
Status - Inactive
failed hostname verification check. Certificate contained +v-ebpqadmz1+ but check expected +v-ebpqadmz1.dmzntqa.corp.adija.co.il+
I've disabled verification check in:
Servers ---> Managed Server -->SSL ---> Advanced ---> Hostname Verification = NONE
How come hostname verification check is still being performed ?
Does anyone knows how can i fix this ?
Meanwhile i had to edit my hostsfile in order to work around it...
Regards
Adi JPlease add the following parameter in your startup argument.
-Dweblogic.security.SSL.ignoreHostnameVerification=true
Thanks
Togotutor
<b><a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.togotutor.com">http://www.togotutor.com</a> (Learn Programming and Administration for Free)</b>
Edited by: togotutor on Aug 12, 2010 3:38 PM -
Nodemanager hostname verification failure
Hi, on some of my machines I installed WL 9.1 on, registry.xml had the fully qualified hostname (this is good), others did not (this is bad). When the admin server tries to connect to the node manager on these machines, I get hostname verification failure because the certificate has the non qual hostname but is expecting fully qual. Simply editing registry.xml to the good value did not fix the issue.
How does weblogic determine the value that goes in the certificate and in registry.xml?
Can I force it somehow?
Can I have it just regenerate the certificate?
Any help would be appreciated.
ThanksMatthew Sacks <> wrote:
does anyone know how i might resolve this issue?
[[NodeManager:300033]Could not execute command ping on the node manager.
[[Reason: weblogic.nodemanager.NodeManagerException: [CommandInvoker:
[[Failed to send command: 'ping to server 'null' to NodeManager at host:
[['10.32.33.2:5555' with exception [Security:090504]Certificate chain
[[received from 10.32.33.2 - 10.32.33.2 failed hostname verification
[[check. Certificate contained qa153 but check expected 10.32.33.2.
[[Please ensure that the NodeManager is active on the target machine].]Hi,
- If you are using scripts:
you can use the following options in your
scripts: -Dweblogic.security.SSL.ignoreHostnameVerification=true
- If you want to use it from the adminserver:
Go to the adminserver in the console
Go to 'SSL'
Select 'Advanced'
Set 'Hostname Verification' to 'none'
And restart the adminserver.
cheers,
Bart
Schelstraete Bart
[email protected]
http://www.schelstraete.org -
Hostname Verification failed for certificate with CommonName 'gawlsdev02.ss
Hi All,
I want to know the meaning and the reason of this exception:
<Jun 17, 2010 2:05:52 PM EDT> <Warning> <Security> <BEA-090504> <Certificate chain received from gawlsdev02 - 147.141.83.104 failed
hostname verification check. Certificate contained gawlsdev02.ssga.statestr.com but check expected gawlsdev02>
<Jun 17, 2010 2:05:52 PM EDT> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Hostname Verification failed for certificate with CommonName 'gawlsdev02.ssga.
statestr.com' against hostname: gawlsdev02>
thanks in advance.When Webloigic Server tries to validate the certificate, it compares te CN of the certificate with the hostname from where the request is coming from.
If they don't match, hostname verfication fails and SSL connection is not established.
In your case I see the CN is gawlsdev02.ssga.statestr.com whereas WLS is expecting it to be gawlsdev02.
U can use this option to ignore host name verification
-Dweblogic.security.SSL.ignoreHostnameVerification=true
To know about other SSL issues, u can refer this
http://weblogic-wonders.com/weblogic/2010/01/28/troubleshooting-ssl-issues/
-Faisal -
ORA-01122: database file 58 failed verification check
Hi All,
I have lost one of my datafile while moving them from 1 drive to another. I am getting the following error while trying to start the database:
ORA-01122: database file 58 failed verification check
ORA-01110: data file 58: 'G:\ORACLE\R3E\SAPDATA7\R3E700_25\R3E700.DATA25'
ORA-01251: Unknown File Header Version read for file number 58
Please suggest what can be done to correct the error. Also I don't have a backup.
Suman- open http://service.sap.com/notes
- enter "ORA-01251"
- you will find Note 696141 - Composite SAP Note: ORA-01122
and that section:
10. ORA-01251: Unknown File Header Version read for file number <file_id>
Reason: The file header cannot be correctly read.
Solution: If you use Oracle 9.2 on WINDOWS and if you already installed the database with Oracle 7.2 or lower, see Note 636466.
Otherwise: Restore/recovery
Markus -
ORA-01122: database file 30 failed verification check
SQL*Plus: Release 10.1.0.4.2 - Production on Wed Feb 13 20:33:13 2008
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
when starting the DB for 10gAS get following error, db is started but cannot sign in
SQL> SQL> Connected.
SQL> ALTER DATABASE open
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01122: database file 30 failed verification check
ORA-01110: data file 30: 'D:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRT\APPS003_A.DBF'
ORA-01203: wrong incarnation of this file - wrong creation SCN
Disconnected from Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.1.0.4.2 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining optionsYou have a mismatch in the control file and data file scn numbers. What was done before the database was getting started? I once saw this error when some one moved one file from another munt point to another and there was no rename give to the control file and the control file got no idea which is this new file and where it had come from?
Try finding the control file which is of the same backup as of this datafile.
Aman.... -
Database file 1 failed verification check on standby
Hi ,
i m getting a trouble on my physical standby database(Oracle 10g Enterprise edition).
I have taken standby controlfile backup from production . And Restored it on Standby database then i m getting following errors :
ORA-01122: database file 1 failed verification check
ORA-01110: data file 1: 'E:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\ORADATA\TESTDR\SYSTEM01.DBF'
ORA-01206: file is not part of this database - wrong database id
My production aND standby database ID are same :
Edited by: user12045405 on Nov 6, 2012 11:16 AMCheck this
http://oracleinstance.blogspot.in/2010/08/ora-01122-ora-01110-ora-01206-after.html -
Database file 4 failed verification check
Hello,
When I start database, message displayed as
follows:
ORA-01122: database file 4 failed verification check
ORA-01110: data file 4: '/usr/nas/databases/D1/DADM/oracle/datafiles/DADM_rollback1.dbf'
ORA-01251: Unknown File Header Version read for file number 4
Database is not started up.
I need help how to fix it.
Thanks in advance
nullDear,
This error says that urs current datafile is corrupted their are two to three solution on which we can work out.......
1.if urs database is in Archive log then do the following
a) shutdown the database
b) start mount
c) make sure that u have all the archive log file in the directory where they should be
d) recover database, then it will ask all archive log file just press enter or write Auto their,
2) If urs database is not in Archive log then u have restore from urs lsat backuup.
3) If this datafile if not very much in use u can make it offline and start urs database.
null -
Custom SSL Hostname Verifier - SSL Hostname Verification Failed
Background:
I am using a java client deployed in weblogic which connects to a 3rd party url over HTTPS.
version: WebLogic server 10.3.0
Issue:
I am connecting to say www.abc.com and the site is presenting its certificate as **.ABC.com*. and I am getting Hostname verification failed.
I am using weblogic's default hotname verifier.
Setting hostname verification to false resolving this error, but I want to keep it for security.
Can anybody please share some best practices to write a custom HostnameVerifier to overcome this kind of problems?
Thanks in advance!An example - this validates that a cert sent to a cluster member ( such as by OSB's internals ) will be validated when the cluster uses a a load balancer address ( defined in the cluster's http tab )
private final String QA_LB_NAME = "my_loadbalancer.net";
private final String QA_HOST1 = "my_serverhost1.net";
private final String QA_HOST2 = "my_serverhost2.net";
public boolean verify(String hostname, SSLSession session) {
try {
Certificate cert = session.getPeerCertificates()[0];
byte[] encoded = cert.getEncoded();
CertificateFactory cf = CertificateFactory.getInstance("X.509");
ByteArrayInputStream bais = new ByteArrayInputStream(encoded);
X509Certificate xcert = (X509Certificate)cf.generateCertificate(bais);
String cn = getCanonicalName(xcert.getSubjectDN().getName());
if (cn.equals(hostname))
return true;
// Allow a match if the load balancer cert is presented from one of its
// servers
if (cn.equals(QA_LB_NAME) &&
((hostname.equals(QA_HOST1)) || (hostname.equals(QA_HOST2))))
return true;
// all other certs fail
return false ;
You can do something similar with your wildcard example - allow the validation if the cn is "*.abc.com" and the hostname is "www.abc.com"
As far as best practices, I would suggest only have specific hard-coded validation entries for known certificates such as your wild card example. You want the default behavior ( of the hostname matching the CN name ) plus your particular case - and nothing else -
Background job failing with license check error
Hi Experts
In our ERP 6.0 system ,all the background jobs are failing with license check error.
Have checked the license in SLICENSE and the license is fine.
There is no warning while users are loggign in ,but when any background job is runing its failing with error
Job started
Logon not possible (error in license check)
Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE
Also performed the license test which is failing
F:\usr\sap\XX1\SYS\exe\uc\NTAMD64>saplicense -test pf=F:\usr\sap\XX1\SYS\profile
\XX1_DVEBMGS00_host_xx
Protocol saplicense test:
Read sapsytem name
ok, sapsytem name = XX1
Read message server host
ok, host = hostname
Read message server service port
ok, service port = sapmsXX1
Connect to message server
ok, connect done
Read hardware key from message server
ok, got hardware key
Detach from message server
ok, detached
Check hardware key
ok, hardware key = T0343073854
Connect to database
ok, connected
Check license
ok, check done
Disconnect database
ok, database disconnected
test result: license test failed
LICENSE system: XX1 hardware key: T0343073854 expiration_date:
installation no: key:
userlimit: 0 productid: R3_BASIS
system-nr:
license expired ***
Please suggest how to troubleshoot.
Regards
Ajay@Michael
In SLICENSe the Hardware key field is not BLUE or BLACK and its showing the exact hardware key which i can see at OS level with saplicense -get command.
@Jagadish
Note is good refrence, i reiinstalled the Digitally signed license with saplikey command and it was successful.
But still the license test is failing at OS Level..below is the command prompt output.
===================================================================
F:\usr\sap\XX1\SYS\exe\uc\NTAMD64>saplikey -install C:\license_script_XX.txt pf
=F:\usr\sap\XX\SYS\profile\XX_DVEBMGS00_mngsez148079
SAP License Key Administration - Copyright (C) 2003 SAP AG
2 SAP license key(s) successfully installed.
F:\usr\sap\XX\SYS\exe\uc\NTAMD64>saplicense -test pf=F:\usr\sap\XX1\SYS\profile
\MD1_DVEBMGS00_mngsez148079
Protocol saplicense test:
Read sapsytem name
ok, sapsytem name = XX1
Read message server host
ok, host = host
Read message server service port
ok, service port = sapmsXX1
Connect to message server
ok, connect done
Read hardware key from message server
ok, got hardware key
Detach from message server
ok, detached
Check hardware key
ok, hardware key = T0343073854
Connect to database
ok, connected
Check license
ok, check done
Disconnect database
ok, database disconnected
test result: license test failed
LICENSE system: XX1 hardware key: T0343073854 expiration_date:
installation no: key:
userlimit: 0 productid: R3_BASIS
system-nr:
license expired ***
============================================================
@Juan
The hardware key was changed and we requested a new license with new hardware key,system was runing fine for couple of weeks with all background jiobs for SPAM./SAINT Ok .We performed EHP4 on this system.
But now this issue is here,so i guess we should troubleshoot.
Please let me know any other pointers.
Regards
Ajay
PS In SLICENSE new installed license is fine and all users can login. -
Hi,
I have a slight issue I'm having some problems resolving..
The scenario is as follows;
I have an external provider which connects to me via VPN to a Juniper SSG firewall, that works fine.
I then have an external site, which does NOT reside in my MPLS cloud, so I have to deploy IPSec via Internet to reach it.
That also works fine and I have multiple SA's running on that site with no issues or problems.
The external provider has a small network device deployed on the external site which monitor cooling values in one of our warehouses.
The external site which is connect via IPSEC has a Cisco 1921 and a numerous Cisco 3550 deployed.
The VLAN for the cooling provider is vlan 150 and is setup with 10.150.4.0/24 where .1 is the def gw and .10 is the cooling monitor device.
The external provider's servers are located within 192.168.220.0/24 subnet.
As of right now, we can reach the Cisco 1921 through the whole IPsec tunnel from 192.168.220.182 with all services, ping, telnet whatnot, but we are unable to ping the cooling device from 192.168.220.0/24.
However from the Cisco 1921, we can ping both 192.168.220.0/24 and the locally connected 10.150.4.10
So basicly it seems to be the last bit when the traffic goes through the 1921 and to the switch where it fails and I can't for the life of me figure out why.
Network diagram attached.. any ideas?
This is the 1921 config:
no service pad
service tcp-keepalives-in
service tcp-keepalives-out
service timestamps debug datetime msec localtime
service timestamps log datetime msec localtime
service password-encryption
hostname bergen-vpn-gw
boot-start-marker
boot system flash flash:c1841-adventerprisek9-mz.124-25d.bin
boot-end-marker
logging buffered 50000
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authentication enable default enable
aaa session-id common
clock timezone CET 1
clock summer-time CET recurring last Sun Mar 2:00 last Sun Oct 3:00
no ipv6 cef
no ip source-route
ip cef
no ip bootp server
no ip domain lookup
ip domain name xxxxx
multilink bundle-name authenticated
license udi pid CISCO1921/K9 sn FCZ1508C1P4
license boot module c1900 technology-package securityk9
license boot module c1900 technology-package datak9
vtp mode client
redundancy
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp key harakiri address 1.2.3.4
crypto ipsec transform-set 3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto map VPN 10 ipsec-isakmp
set peer 1.2.3.4
set transform-set 3DES-SHA
match address VPN
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
no ip route-cache cef
no ip route-cache
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.99
description *** Test VLAN To be removed ***
encapsulation dot1Q 99
ip address 10.90.90.1 255.255.255.0
no ip route-cache
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.112
encapsulation dot1Q 112
ip address 192.168.112.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 172.30.1.223
no ip route-cache
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.150
encapsulation dot1Q 150
ip address 10.150.4.1 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
no ip route-cache
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.178
encapsulation dot1Q 178
ip address 192.168.178.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 172.30.1.223
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
no ip route-cache
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.999
encapsulation dot1Q 999
no ip route-cache
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
ip address 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
no ip route-cache cef
no ip route-cache
duplex auto
speed auto
crypto map VPN
interface FastEthernet0/0/0
switchport access vlan 99
interface FastEthernet0/0/1
interface FastEthernet0/0/2
interface FastEthernet0/0/3
interface Vlan1
no ip address
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 85.200.203.29
ip access-list extended VPN
permit ip 10.90.90.0 0.0.0.255 172.30.1.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 10.90.90.0 0.0.0.255 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255
permit ip 10.90.90.0 0.0.0.255 172.18.5.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 10.90.90.0 0.0.0.255 10.50.0.0 0.0.255.255
permit ip 192.168.112.0 0.0.0.255 172.30.1.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 192.168.112.0 0.0.0.255 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255
permit ip 192.168.112.0 0.0.0.255 172.18.5.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 192.168.112.0 0.0.0.255 10.50.0.0 0.0.255.255
permit ip 192.168.178.0 0.0.0.255 172.30.1.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 192.168.178.0 0.0.0.255 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255
permit ip 192.168.178.0 0.0.0.255 172.18.5.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 192.168.178.0 0.0.0.255 10.50.0.0 0.0.255.255
permit ip 192.168.112.0 0.0.0.255 172.30.240.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 192.168.178.0 0.0.0.255 172.30.240.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 192.168.112.0 0.0.0.255 10.70.0.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 192.168.178.0 0.0.0.255 10.70.0.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 10.150.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.220.0 0.0.0.255 log
ip sla 1
icmp-echo 172.30.1.223 source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.178
threshold 20
frequency 120
ip sla schedule 1 start-time now
ip sla 2
icmp-echo 10.50.1.200 source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.178
threshold 20
frequency 120
ip sla schedule 2 start-time now
ip sla 3
icmp-echo 172.18.5.121 source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.178
threshold 20
frequency 120
ip sla schedule 3 start-time now
ip sla 4
icmp-echo 172.22.0.140 source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.178
threshold 20
frequency 120
ip sla schedule 4 start-time now
ip sla 5
icmp-echo 172.30.240.40 source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.178
threshold 20
frequency 120
ip sla schedule 5 start-time now
ip sla 6
icmp-echo 10.70.0.200 source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.178
threshold 20
frequency 120
ip sla schedule 6 start-time now
cdp source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.112
snmp-server community bamacomro RO
cdp source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.112
snmp-server community bamacomro RO
snmp-server community bamacomrw RW
control-plane
banner motd ^CCC-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This system is solely for the use of authorised users for official purposes.
You have no expectation of privacy in its use and to ensure that the system
is functioning properly, individuals using this computer system are subject
to having all their activities monitored and recorded by system personell.
Use of this system evidence an express consent to such monitoring and
agreement that if such monitoring reveals evidence of possible abuse or
criminal activity, system personell may provide the result of such
monitoring to appropiate officials.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------^C
line con 0
exec-timeout 5 0
logging synchronous
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
access-class telnet in
exec-timeout 180 0
logging synchronous
transport input telnet ssh
line vty 5 15
access-class telnet in
exec-timeout 180 0
password 7 094F471A1A0A
logging synchronous
transport input telnet ssh
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
endI had that issue 1 year go
"decrypted packet failed SA identity check" means that we have decrypted a traffic that does not match the proxy ID negotiated
Juniper is violating RFC4301. there is nothing we can do against RFC violation
As mentioned in Section 4.4.1, "The Security Policy Database (SPD)",
the SPD (or associated caches) MUST be consulted during the
processing of all traffic that crosses the IPsec protection boundary,
including IPsec management traffic. If no policy is found in the SPD
that matches a packet (for either inbound or outbound traffic), the
packet MUST be discarded.
I know JNPR can do 2 vpn modes. There is one where we could use a VTI instead of a crypto map on the Cisco side. That was the solution to the problem we had.
Cheers, -
some one please answer this, every time i go into application loader it says, application failed codesign verification , please go into depth im a beginner, and only use gamesalad please respond as soon as possible!
yes i did sorry for the late response LOL plus it was just a minor error! Just check to make sure u have all of ur correct distribution/developer/and creator certificates in your keychain access installed and up-to-date! Plus i have had over 900 downloads on that game!! ^^
-CHEERS /RYAN -
HELP - Application failed codesign verification - iPhone
When I use APplication Loader, or through ITunes COnnect, I get these two errors
1- Noob Alert.app/noob60x60.png: icon dimensions (60 x 60) don't meet the size requirements
2- Application failed codesign verification. Please see the console log for additional details
More INformation
1- If I understand correctly, the icon (png) for the info.plist must be (60x60 pixels), which I did in CS4, and exported as a png, but still get this error ? however the icon loads fine on the 'Sandbox" and on my iPhone
2- I see many people have got this issue before, seems to me I am all confused about security, for a second, so I ran to the CONSOLE and am going to copy and paste the log, I am confused as to why this is happening, as I seem to think I have it set correctly....
- Console LOG -
10-01-25 8:21:10 PM ApplicationLoader[46887] * Codesign error (please ignore invalid option comments): got requirements(0x800000, 541)
Executable=/var/folders/Da/Da31BpsfFq0LB1yT9tv6o++TM/-Tmp-/Archive2.zip/Noob Alert.app/Noob Alert
Identifier=com.Back2Front.
Format=bundle with Mach-O thin (armv6)
CodeDirectory v=20100 size=264 flags=0x0(none) hashes=5+5 location=embedded
Signature size=4288
Authority=iPhone Developer: Katherine Uysal (QCE6HYL37H)
Authority=Apple Worldwide Developer Relations Certification Authority
Authority=Apple Root CA
Signed Time=2010-01-25 8:19:44 PM
Info.plist entries=18
Sealed Resources rules=3 files=8
Internal requirements count=1 size=144
Executable=/var/folders/Da/Da31BpsfFq0LB1yT9tv6o++TM/-Tmp-/Archive2.zip/Noob Alert.app/Noob Alert
got entitlements(0x800400, 312)
codesign_wrapper-0.7.3: using Apple CA for profile evaluation
codesign_wrapper-0.7.3: Caling codesign with the following args:
codesign_wrapper-0.7.3: /usr/bin/codesign
codesign_wrapper-0.7.3: --verify
codesign_wrapper-0.7.3: -vvvv
codesign_wrapper-0.7.3: -R=anchor apple generic and certificate 1[field.1.2.840.113635.100.6.2.1] exists and certificate leaf[field.1.2.840.113635.100.6.1.4] exists
codesign_wrapper-0.7.3: --entitlements
codesign_wrapper-0.7.3: /var/tmp/signingbox/codesignwrapperentitlements.plist
codesign_wrapper-0.7.3: /var/folders/Da/Da31BpsfFq0LB1yT9tv6o++TM/-Tmp-/Archive2.zip/Noob Alert.app
/var/folders/Da/Da31BpsfFq0LB1yT9tv6o++TM/-Tmp-/Archive2.zip/Noob Alert.app: valid on disk
/var/folders/Da/Da31BpsfFq0LB1yT9tv6o++TM/-Tmp-/Archive2.zip/Noob Alert.app: satisfies its Designated Requirement
test-requirement: failed to satisfy code requirement(s)
10-01-25 8:21:10 PM ApplicationLoader[46887] * Error: /Users/chance/Desktop/NoobAlert/build/Release-iphoneos/Archive2.zip: validation failures: (
"Noob Alert.app/noob60x60.png: icon dimensions (60 x 60) don't meet the size requirements",
"Application failed codesign verification. Please see the console log for additional details"
as a troubleshooting step, I did check and make sure my iPhone could run that app, and it runs it fine externally no problem1.) 57 X 57 pixels.
Spelled out in the 'Program Portal User Guide' (step 12, pg. 58*) and when the error is reported during an upload via ITC, at least in my experience.
+*"Click ‘Build’. (Note: Your binary must contain a flattened, square-image icon that is 57x57 pixels. This icon is displayed on the iPhone or iPod touch home screen.)"+ -
How to disable hostname verification on iplanet reverse proxy
I am looking for a way to disable hostname verification of the application server url specified in teh reverse proxy setup.
I am using the following setting in my Object definitions. It is failing due to the certificate CN is not matching the url I specified
The error is :
for host xx.yy.zz.ww trying to GET /uri/loginAction.do, service-http reports: HTTP7758: error sending request (SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN: Requested domain name does not match the server's certificate.)
Route fn="set-origin-server" server="https://bbb.com:7002/" poll-timeout="20000" retries="2"
My tomcat certificate CN has aaa.com
While I am using the tomcat on bbb.com.
Is there any way to disable hostname verification on a reverproxy setup. I am unable to find any relevant documentation on this.
The closest discussion I found was https://forums.oracle.com/thread/1943116 but it did not conclude anything.Found a solution from Oracle Knowledge base:
This fixed our issue
<Object name="reverse-proxy-/abc">
ObjectType fn="ssl-client-config" validate-server-cert="false"
Route fn="set-origin-server" server="https://server1.test.com:11011" server="https://server2.test.com:11011"
</Object>
Maybe you are looking for
-
Please Help me! Start RFC Jobs Error
Dear Experts, I'm installing SAP R/3 4.7 EX 2 SR1 - IDES (Unicode). Details of the system: Solaris 10, Oracle 9.2.0.7. R/3 Enterprise 4.7 X 2 SR1 - IDES (Unicode) I have received this error during installation Phase 34/37. This is about Starting RFC
-
IPAD ,PC,iPod content syncing
I just got a new IPAD. Since setting it up, I'm unable to view my IPOD classic music content on my PC or my IPAD on iTunes. How can I get my IPOD content back on my PC and IPAD?
-
How can I tell which photos were edited
I would like to transfer all of the photos in my iphoto library on my 3 year old mac mini to my new iMac and use Lightroom instead of iPhoto or Aperture. If I edited a photo, I want to transfer only the edited version and not the original. How can
-
Time machine missing the 'Latest' Symlink
Hey Gang, I have a friend that had a failed Hard drive and when she tried to recover from time machine, it did not recognize as a TM backup at all. After looking into it, the 'Latest' shortcut is missing in the backup on the time capsule. I looked on
-
HT1338 iphoto will not launch after Mountain Lion update
I recently upgraded to OS X: Mountain Lion. I can no longer launch iPhoto, I get this message; "You can't open your current photo library using this version of iPhoto. You have made changes to your photo library using a newer version of iPhoto. Plea