Not able to assign and process PR in Tcode-me57

Dear Friends,
I have created a PR manually.When i tried to create PO with T Code-ME57 after giving the selection criteria,system is throwing a message "No suitable PR's found".But i checked in the system for my PR by displaying it,it is available.then why the system is giving this message (only in me57 transaction).
Kindly help me in resolving this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Pratap.

Hi,
Automatic conversion of PR in to PO using transaction code ME59N. It is not possible to convert the PR in to PO by using ME57.
This transaction code- ME57 used to assign the sources like vendor for the PR. Pre-requistic for this transaction base assignment you have already maintained Info record and source list for the material and vendor.
Pre requistic setting for the Automatic PO:
Flagged Automatic PO in SPRO->Inventory management->Goods receipt->create PO automatically
1.Automatic PO flagged at material master in purchasing view.
2.In Vendor master flagged Automatic PO in Purchasing data screen.
3.Create Info Record.
4.Maintain Source list.
5.Create PR.
6.Convert Automatic PR in to PO via t-code ME59N.
Regards,
thiru
Edited by: thiru on Dec 15, 2009 5:23 AM
Edited by: thiru on Dec 15, 2009 5:26 AM

Similar Messages

A problem while assign and process purchase requisitions using Me57

Hello everybody:
Today I used me57 to assign and process purchase requisition of 0010000732, but there is only one vendor when assign automatically , however two vendors were assigned with me01 when maintained source list, what's the possible reason of the problem, Thank you everyone in advance, cheers.

hi,
Check in source list ie ME04 whether fixed vendor is ticked.
Thanks
suresh

Solman 7.1 - Created Template not able to assign and active it

Dear All,
Solman_setup - Technical Monitoring - System Monitoring, While maintain the technical monitoring -> Template Maintenance.
Created template is not display in tab Manager Object to apply and active, after that only it will be display to assign template in setup monitoring tab
Please help me
Regards

Hi,
Automatic conversion of PR in to PO using transaction code ME59N. It is not possible to convert the PR in to PO by using ME57.
This transaction code- ME57 used to assign the sources like vendor for the PR. Pre-requistic for this transaction base assignment you have already maintained Info record and source list for the material and vendor.
Pre requistic setting for the Automatic PO:
Flagged Automatic PO in SPRO->Inventory management->Goods receipt->create PO automatically
1.Automatic PO flagged at material master in purchasing view.
2.In Vendor master flagged Automatic PO in Purchasing data screen.
3.Create Info Record.
4.Maintain Source list.
5.Create PR.
6.Convert Automatic PR in to PO via t-code ME59N.
Regards,
thiru
Edited by: thiru on Dec 15, 2009 5:23 AM
Edited by: thiru on Dec 15, 2009 5:26 AM

Not able to assign process server to file events.

Hi,
our requirement is we want a file event to be raised when ever a file is uploaded in BW.
when we tried to configured a file event we are not able to assign a process server. when we click on process server our bw process server is not popped up.
i am not clear what setting needs to be maintained in dataroot directory.
Process Server>>Parametes>>Data root directory
or
do we need to set up any platform agent on BW System
please advise.

Hi Anthon ,
1)Do we require seperate license for Platform agents and once after downloading the platform agent can we install from CPS side by submitting job definition or this is a BASIS job to install the platform agent on the system where we want the files to be detected.
2)is there any setting needs to be done on CPS side after we intall Platform Agents in the bw system.
Regards
Rajesh Dhaval

Service desk---not able to assign employee and user to a position

As i click on employee or user one popup comes and doesn't open. Therefore i am not able to assign a employee or user to a position.
Friends please help me out.
regards
Rajneesh

Hi Rajneesh,
yes, please use the IE and add the pop-up-page to the compatibility mode under "EXTRAS --> Settings for compotibility mode --> ADD".
Cheers,
Robert

NOT ABLE TO ASSIGN MO:OPERATING UNIT PROFILE VAL TO A RESPONSIBILITY

I am trying to create new orgnization and assigning parameters in AP. I am not able to assign profile values. Could you pl. clarify foll points..
To generate seeded data, it is displaying(in the concurrent program) existing operating unit in the LOV not the new Operating unit that I created.
When i try to associate new Responsibilty to MO operating unit level, it is displaying existing organization not newly created org.
NOt able to assign profile values to business group(field is protected against update) as I created new ORG not with "setup Business Group".
When i click legal entity parameter in operating unit, it is displaying
"NO ENTRIES FOUND FOR LIST OF VALUES"
I would appreciate your early response
Thanks
Ven.
[email protected]

Hi Nagamohan
Your query returned me the seeded ones:
GL_AUTO_ALLOC_WF_PKG
PA_AUTOALLOC_WF_PKG
We have a value at the site level, and at the 1st OM super user responsibility having the issue has no default value, hence defaulting the value from the site level.
The other OM super user responsibility has a value. And this value is defaulted to the 1st OM responsibility profile from time to time.
The other responsibility OM Administrator have no problem. This value changes when the users logged into this OM super user responsibilities (both OU), the value switches back and forth to 2nd OU value and then the site level value fills the value for the 1st OM super user responsibility(even though we didn't have any default value before).
If the users logged into 1st OM Administrator responsibility to process the orders, then no problem, the value stays to the correct OU).
We have been relying on the defaulting value(coming from the site level) for all this time and have had no problems until now. It was always blank for the 1st OM super user. but, when the problem started then only it's having issue. I manually deleted the value (wrong value from the other OU) at the 1st OM Super user level, then next time the user logs into the 1st OM Super user resp, then it's having the correct value(same as site), and keep on updating the value with this correct value. But, all of a sudden it changes to the wrong OU value, don't know what object is causing this...
Thanks
Radhika

ME57- assign and process

Hi,
When i execute ME57- assign and process PR T-code, i get POP UP with options having Info records and contracts maintained for the material in particular PR. But If that contract is with some account assignment category its not getting proposed. What way i can get the contracts called having account assignment category. Right now i am getting contract in that POP UP list which are not having any account assignment.
Regards,
Sachin

Hi Muthu
You can do that with variant option ME57 --> goto variant --> variant save as
1. Assigned Purchase Requiesitions---make required field
2. Released Requisitions only---- default value check box
if it solve pls reward and close
Thanks
bala

Not able to assign the chart of depreciation

Hi i am not able to assign the chart of depreciation, can any one provide me the detail path for the below issue.
Inconsistency between FI company code BHEL and chart of deprec. BHEL
Message no. AC481
Diagnosis
You tried to assign chart of depreciation BHEL to company code BHEL. According to its Customizing definition, this company code manages parallel currencies.
The chart of depreciation does not contain a corresponding depreciation area for each of the currency types that are defined in the company code.
System Response
This assignment is not possible.
Procedure
1. Check the currency types of the company code.
2. Specify a corresponding depreciation area for each currency type.

Dear,
Rajesh.
Good Morning !
If your company code is having more than one currency than you will have to maintain that many depreciation areas.
OR
Before assigning COD to Company Code, delete the parallel currency maintained in multiple currencies in global settings.
below is the path:-
SPRO>Financial Accounting>Financial Accounting Global Settings>Company Code>Multiple Currencies-->Define Additional Local Currencies
After deleting you can assign the COD to Company Code.
After assigning you have go back again in define additional local currencies screen (mentioned above) and maintain the parallel currency which you have deleted.
You have first to Assign Input Tax Indicator for Non-Taxable Acquisitions in transaction code OBCL.
Check your parallel currencies in T.code OABT.
I hope this will help you to solve your issue. If you have any doubts feel free to share.
Regards,
Pankaj A Bhalerao.

Not able to Assign Organizational Units to the Sites

Hi all,
while configuring intercompany billing I am not able to assign the Organizational Units to the Sites.
I am in retail system and maybe here I have to do something else before seting up the intercompany?
Thanks in advance
L

Hi,
Go through the Building block and their prerequisites
http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/html/R01_EN_DE.htm
http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/html/R41_EN_DE.htm
Thanks
Chidambaram

EHPI not able to start and stop services shadowsystem

All,
I am working on an installation of EHP4 but am running in the following issue:
When I get to the phase SHDINST_OS the EHPI is not able to stop and start the service for the shadowsystem. The ehpi log gives:
Phase SHDINST_OS:
SAPehpi> Starting subprocess sapstartsrv.exe with id 7348 at 20100512081320
Environment: JAVA_HOME=C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0_19
Environment: PATHEXT=.COM;.EXE;.BAT;.CMD;.VBS;.VBE;.JS;.JSE;.WSF;.WSH;.MSC
Environment: Path=C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\binn\;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\binn\;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\90\DTS\Binn\;C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\Binn\VSShell\Common7\IDE\;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\DTS\Binn\;F:\usr\sap\HRS\SYS\exe\uc\NTAMD64;F:\usr\sap\HRS\SYS\exe\nuc\NTAMD64
Environment: auth_shadow_upgrade=0
Environment: dbs_mss_schema=hrs
Service not started.
Process with ID 8132 terminated with status -1
The EHPI gives:
An error occurred during the installation of the
SAP service SAPHRS_03:
Possibly the password for user .\SAPServiceHRS entered in phase
INITPUT was wrong. You can reset it by calling 'SAPehpi set stdpar'.
Try to execute SAPSTARTSRV.EXE manually using the following syntax:
G:\EHPI\abap\exe\sapstartsrv.exe -r
-p G:\EHPI\abap\HRS\SYS\profile\START_DVEBMGS03_NLDBHRS01 -s HRS -n 03
-U .\SAPServiceHRS -P <PASSWORD> -e NLDBHRS01\hrsadm
and check if the service SAPHRS_03 can be stopped and restarted.
When I follow up on the sapstartsrv first I can start/create it but that when I restart the EHPI it fails again on the same issue.
Anybody any ideas?
the passwords given in the EHPI are the ones of the SAPService user in the windows environment
Chris

Hi
Have you tried below option as suggested in logs ?
> Possibly the password for user .\SAPServiceHRS entered in phase
> INITPUT was wrong. You can reset it by calling 'SAPehpi set stdpar'.
> Try to execute SAPSTARTSRV.EXE manually using the following syntax:
> G:\EHPI\abap\exe\sapstartsrv.exe -r
> -p G:\EHPI\abap\HRS\SYS\profile\START_DVEBMGS03_NLDBHRS01 -s HRS -n 03
> -U .\SAPServiceHRS -P <PASSWORD> -e NLDBHRS01\hrsadm
> and check if the service SAPHRS_03 can be stopped and restarted.
>
Thanks
Sunny

Not able to assign Project to the Urgent Change Request with Developer Id with the existing Authorizations. With SAP_ALL authorization, everything works fine.

The Urgent Change request is in created status and I am not able to assign project to it. Also I am not able to change the status of the change request to In developement with developer's Id. Everything works fine if i assign SAP_ALL authorization to the developer.
Below are the roles assigned to Developer ID -
SAP_CM_SMAN_DEVELOPER
SAP_SM_CRM_UIU_FRAMEWORK
SAP_SM_CRM_UIU_SOLMANPRO
SAP_SM_CRM_UIU_SOLMANPRO_CHARM
SAP_SMWORK_BASIC_CHANGE_MAN
SAP_SMWORK_CHANGE_MAN
SAP_SOCM_DEVELOPER
Z_S001
ZSAP_SOCM_DEVELOPER
Issue screen -
SU53 for Developer-
Please suggest which roles/Authorization should be assign to Developer Id.
Thanks
Kavita

Hi Kavita,
Copy these roles to Z-roles
SAP_CM_SMAN_DEVELOPER
SAP_SM_CRM_UIU_FRAMEWORK
SAP_SM_CRM_UIU_SOLMANPRO
SAP_SM_CRM_UIU_SOLMANPRO_CHARM
SAP_SMWORK_BASIC_CHANGE_MAN
SAP_SMWORK_CHANGE_MAN
SAP_SOCM_DEVELOPER
Assign this to user.
Put a stace using ST01.
Find that object and modify/add in your custom role.
Regards,
Divyanshu

Rework Production Order not able to confirm and no cost calculation

Hi Guys,
During rework production order confirmation system giving error message as below:
[Item category 01001 not allowed in accounting transaction 0000/0001
Message no. GLT2001
Diagnosis
The online document splitting is active in your system. Here, each document is assigned to a accounting transaction variant and each document row to an item category. You determine for each business transaction variant which item categories can or must be posted here.
The following error occurred for the document you entered:
Item category 01001 in accounting transaction 0000, variant 0001 is no allowed.
System Response
The document cannot be posted.
Procedure
Check the document entered, the derivation of the business transaction variant, the derivation of the item category, and the assignment of the item categories to the business transaction variant.
Procedure for System Administration]
This error relating to New G/L split functionality such as the document type and G/L accounts document type. Doc type is using as same as normal production order and normal production order confirmations and other activities are posted successfully. Iu2019m in a puzzle, regards to this behavior of rework order?
Back ground for rework order:
Rework order was created through trigger points.
Rework order doesn't have any material, it has to pick and settle to original production order; the same was defined at re-work order settlement.
Rework order not doing any cost calculations at production order level itu2019s giving a message as below:
Object was not costed
Message no. CK060
Diagnosis
The system could not find any entries that are relevant to costing.
System Response
The system did not cost the object.
Procedure
Check whether the following objects should be flagged as relevant to costing:
- Items in the BOM
- Display BOM
- Operations in the routing
- Control key in the routing
1. Look at the message log.
2. Check whether a quantity was specified in the confirmation.
Will some one throw some light to come out from this situation and what I missed out and what need to be maintained exactly Plz.
Thanks in advanceu2026Vyas

Hi Mangalraj,
Have check the BOM & Routing for Parent production order costing check box is for both. Coming to rework order doesn't have any material, though it has pulled the some material cost from parent production order. The same can see at production order costs>analysis, but where as costs>itemization not able to see and mesage issued like: object was not costed.
as early mentioned, confirmation level same error.
Hope this may give some idea on this case, thanks for your time on this.
Looking forward some light.
Thanks...Vyas

With my hp office 5010 all in one printer, i'm not able to scan, and this is one of his duties. why

with my hp office 5010 all in one printer, i'm not able to scan, and this is one of his duties. why isn't it possible?? Bad ssoftware while downloading it from internet because I lost CD rom. No pilot available for scanning with it??? Bad version of soft??? I bauught this printer because of his utility and space occupped: able to print, copy and scan in same machine, gain of room, perfect, but my scanning function is not working!!!! I would like to solve this damned problem which upset me since several weeks.... Waiting for an answer and a solution, best regards

pmonteil31 wrote:
Waiting for an answer and a solution, best regards
Hi,
Sorry you have to wait longer because I can not find your printer model under Google. Must be very old ?
Regards,
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

Not able to recover and restore Lenovo V100 ; restarts after hanging at line mup.sys in safe mode.

Not able to recover and restore Lenovo V100 (WinXP professional) ; restarts after hanging at line mup.sys in safe mode.
Problem started occurring suddenly after restart of the laptop.
Windows XP start page (With dots moving) came up and I tried to restart the laptop in Safe mode.
It stopped at a line mup.sys and after a while restarted automatically.
Tried with inbuilt lenovo recovery and restore option.. but in vain...
each screen is very very slow.. I tried patiently (With restore back to factory settings options) but finally I got message that restore failed.
Can any body please help to me to resolve the Issue. I'm new to Tokyo and dont know any servicing center here :-(...
Any body from Tokyo ? can you tell me where the service center is here in Shinagawa?
Thanks in Advance....
Swami

Call Lenovo support in Japan and ask for a set of Recovery disks for your machine.
Japan --Desktops 0120-000-817
Notebooks 0570-064-400
9AM - 6PM
Everyday
Except Second Sunday of the month, Year end

My wife and I share the same email address and Apple ID. We are not able to send and receive Text Messages to one another.

My wife and I share the same email address and Apple ID. We are not able to send and receive Text Messages to one another. Is the cause of this because we share the same Apple ID? Will we have to set up 2 separate primary email addresses to be able to send and receive Tex Messages to one another? Like I said, we share the same email address and woul like to keep it that way to keep up with our email together. Is there a way to by-pass having to set up 2 primary emaill addresses if this is the problem?
Thanks.

go to the settings and turn off imessage
but that don't change the issue that you will never be able to facetime eachtoher
the appleID is really meant as the handle that identify you it was not meant to be shared
but can see that people may want to do not buy apps more then once

Not able to assign and process PR in Tcode-me57

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for