Not adopting both line items

Hallo Sapians
I have created two Scheduling agreements with one vendor.But while creating Inbond delievery only one line item is adopted & message came that two inbond delieveries are created.
What to do now so that i can adpoted both the delieveries.

Hi,
Is both are different materials or same?
If it is same material from same vendor then you can adopt in one.

Similar Messages

PO will not print if line items are trash-canned

Hello,
We have an instance where we had to cancel both line items on a PO. However, the system will not allow a printout, since there are no line items. How can we get a printout to send to the vendor to confirm that both line items are cancelled? Config looks right. Deletion is a change relevant field, but the system displays a message when trying to print 'no print relevant information changed'.
Please advise.
Thank you.

Yes. We get change messages when qty or delivery date is changed, but for some reason, when you delete all line items, it doesn't generate any change. The checkbox is not checked therefore we can't print. If only 1 item is deleted, then it's OK, but if you delete all items, no printout.

GR of Delivery completed item not possible for line item of PO/SA ?

Hi,
Am unable to Receive Goods in MIGO an Error - "GR of delivery completed item not possible for line item of PO/SA"?
Regards
Mohammed Khaja Pasha
+919550917395.

Hi Mohammed Khaja Pasha ;
Delivery Completed checkbox provides a lot of fonctionality like an additional delivery is not expected, but is possible. If you prevent posting of migo , you can benefit from system messages M7 163 and 254.
You want to ensure that the delivery is made before the planned delivery date : Set message 254.
You want to ensure last possible delivery date : Set message 163.
However ;
The open PO quantity of the PO item equals zero.
The PO item is no longer relevant for materials planning.
The PO item is ignored when letters urging delivery of overdue goods are generated.
The PO item can be deleted and archived.
You can specify whether the Delivery Completed checkbox is to be selected automatically.
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal

Error - Balancing Line Item Profit Center not filled in Line Item 007

Hi
I am trying to do a transfer posting from one vendor account to another. However, system is giving an error - Balancing Line Item Profit Center not filled in line Item 001. Pls suggest.
Regards
Vaibhav

hi vaibhav
you go through this Tcode FAGL3KEH and maintain default profit centre. in the error message system shown GL accounts
hope you userstand
thanks
dharmendar

Not cleared two line items from the GR/IR clearing

For one of the items in PO following transactions are done...
        Mtype   Date            Quantity             Amount
GR   101    06/14/09        1 02.001            887.85
GR   102    06/14/09        102.001-            887.85
GR   101    06/14/09        101.999             887.85
GR   101    07/22/09        102.001             923.61
IR-L            06/14/09        102.001            887.85
IR-L            06/14/09        101.999            887.85
FBL3N: out put
Open items
Doc Type Date                           Amount
WE           06/14/2009 86            887.85
WE           07/22/2009 96            923.61-
Cleared items:
Doc Type Date                           Amount
WE            06/14/2009 96              887.85-
Z9             06/09/2009 86              887.85
WE            06/14/2009 96              887.85-
Z9             06/09/2009 86              887.85
System has not cleared two line items from the GR/IR clearing for this line item in PO.
What could be the reason these items are not cleared and now how these line
items can be cleared?

Hi,
When the Dr and Cr amount are equal to zero system will automatically clear the line items in F.13. Here the open items are appearing with different amounts due to that system not able to clear.
By passing some manual JV or something you done to make Dr and Cr equal to zero then you clear through F-03(untick post automatically for this clearing in T.cdoe FS00)
Regards,
Sankar

GL display for inventory account which are not defined as line item display

Hi All,
We have inventory gl accounts which are auto post accounts , these accounts get posted when grn is done. these accounts are not defined as line item display accounts, but if we execute the T code: FS10 we get the gl balance display and not line item display.
Our requirement is that we should be able to view the line item display matching the GL account balance in that GL account.
Can we get the report in MM module line items wise display.
Regards
Prashant P. Zinge

Hello,
You should use RFSEPA01 program via execute SE38 transaction.
This program activate line item for each account. Activation means, this program generate line items to BSIS table. So that after this program running, you can see line items in FBL3N.
Regards,
Burak

After Release material in PR not create new line item material

Hi friends
I m facing a problem in PR . When PR is Release then not add new line item in existing PR. It have any solution .
pls give the solution .
thanks .
Anup .

Hi,
Go to ME54N > Here reverse Release of PR and then add the new line item and then release it again.
OR if you don't want to do as above then Go to SPRO > MM > Purchase Requisition > Release Procedure > Procedure with Classification > Set Up Procedure with Classification > Release indicator > Here for Release indicator "2" (RFQ/purchase order), if you have entered Changeabil. as "1" then change it to "4"
Also check if you have assigned a Field Selection Key as only Display PR then you have to change it or remove it.

Header PO discount, not apportioned to line item

Hi MM Gurus
My client wants to create a multi line item PO and also will like to include the header discount (value based). The client does not want the discount to be apportioned to each line item. He wants the line items to be received and paid at its original cost. Can someone suggest if this can be done and how?
Here is the example:
PO with 3 lines
Line one 100 each @ 25 = $2500
Line two 200 eaxh @ 30 = $6000
Line three 150 each @ 10 = $1500
Header discount = $500
Line items still remain at their actual values. The discount is not applied to line items. Upon LIV, the PO line items received at actual price, but the overall discount adjusted.
Any guidance will be appreciated.
Regards,
Vinay

Hi.
I'm not sure if the following info help you.
But how about to set the "Condition is used for
statistics" flag V_T683S-KSTAT?
You can set it in your pricing procedure and
for your condition type.
As far as I know, the header condition is not reflected to
the net price.(Though reflected to the "effective price".)
When GR, GR/IR will be from net price.
Best regards.
Keiichiro

Profit center not flowing in line item 2

Hi Experts,
We have activated document splitting and kept the field Business Area (BA), Profit center (PCTR) and Segment mandatory and only business area and segment as zero balancing field.
While doing F-02 for an entry of Expense a/c..... Dr, Bank A/c ... Cr, I am giving cost center (say A) in the expense line item. From that Business area (say K) and Segment (say X) is taken in the expense line item and if I do not give anything in the bank line item the same is inherited there also.
If i give a separate profit center (B) in the bank line item (other than that in the expense line item) and keep the business area blank, automatic line item of 'inter branch clearing' is generated with 2 different PCTR (say A and B) and segment (say X and Y) but same business area
*But if I give a separate business area in the bank line item and keep the profit center blank though it is generating automatic line item of inter-branch clearing for separate business areas but it is not inheriting profit center from the expense line item and it is giving me an error that profit center in line item is not filled
Please help
Sourabh

@ Murli: The scenarios for OL ledger is maintained so that is not the reason.
@ Ravi: I also initially thought the same but even after making profit center zero balanced it did not work.
The scenario is like this:
We are trying to post a JV - Dr. Expense a/c to Bank a/c.
1. When both BA & PC are left blank in the Bank line item, both are getting inherited from the Expense line item.
2. When both BA & PC are manually given, system is taking the manual inputs only.
3. When user enters PC manually but leaves BA blank, system takes that PC (user input) and inherits BA from the Expense line item.
4. BUT, when user enters BA manually & leaves PC blank, system is taking the BA (user input) & leaving the PC field blank, i.e. not inheriting PC from the Expense line item.
Regards
Sourabh

SAP Note 1486147 - TDS line item details not flowing in Form 16 A Samrtform

1.     Old Form 16 certificate is printed before 01.04.2010 and new certificate after 01.04.2010. (its correct SAP has written code in such a manner Old one is SAP script and new on is Smartform.)
Old FORM 16 A gets Acknowledgement No details correctly.
2.     Acknowledgment No details are not flowing in the NEW Smart Form of Form 16 A.
When I debug the program I can see PARTNER No details are copied in PAN NO field in TABLE : IT_LFA11[]
BUT PARTNER NO details are copied to PARTNERNO field in TABLE IT_LAFA1[].
TDS line item details on Smart Form is printed based on Partner no. here partner no. is blank as IT_LFA11 table is passed to smartform..
Program name : J_1IEWT_CERT
Include name : J_1IEWT_CERT_F01.
Code:
FORM CALL_FORM .
DATA: h_formname TYPE tdsfname,
          h_fmname TYPE rs38l_fnam,
          h_output_info TYPE ssfcrescl,
          h_spoolids TYPE LINE OF ssfcrescl-spoolids,
          h_output_options TYPE ssfcompop,
           spoolno(10) TYPE c.
DATA : it_lfa11 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_LFA1 INITIAL SIZE 0,
         it_printtab TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_PRINTTAB INITIAL SIZE 0,
         it_deduc TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_DEDUCTEE INITIAL SIZE 0,
         it_qrtrtab TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_QRTRTAB INITIAL SIZE 0,
         it_challan TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_CHALLANDETAB INITIAL SIZE 0.
SORT challandetab BY j_1iextchdt DESCENDING.
it_lfa11[] = it_lfa1[].
it_printtab[] = printtab[].
it_deduc[] = it_deductor[].
it_qrtrtab[] = qrtrtab[].
it_challan[] = challandetab[].
h_output_options-tdnewid    = 'X'.
h_formname = layout.
CALL FUNCTION 'SSF_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME'
    EXPORTING
      formname                 = h_formname
*   VARIANT                  = ' '
*   DIRECT_CALL              = ' '
   IMPORTING
     fm_name                  = h_fmname
* EXCEPTIONS
*   NO_FORM                  = 1
*   NO_FUNCTION_MODULE       = 2
*   OTHERS                   = 3
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
CALL FUNCTION h_fmname
EXPORTING
*   ARCHIVE_INDEX              =
*   ARCHIVE_INDEX_TAB          =
*   ARCHIVE_PARAMETERS         =
*   CONTROL_PARAMETERS         =
*   MAIL_APPL_OBJ              =
*   MAIL_RECIPIENT             =
*   MAIL_SENDER                =
   OUTPUT_OPTIONS             = h_output_options
*   USER_SETTINGS              = 'X'
IMPORTING
*   DOCUMENT_OUTPUT_INFO       =
   job_output_info            = h_output_info
*   JOB_OUTPUT_OPTIONS         =
    TABLES
      it_lfa1                    =   it_lfa11
      it_printtab                = it_printtab
      it_deductee                = it_deduc
      it_qrtrtab                 = it_qrtrtab
      it_challandetab            = it_challan
* EXCEPTIONS
*   FORMATTING_ERROR           = 1
*   INTERNAL_ERROR             = 2
*   SEND_ERROR                 = 3
*   USER_CANCELED              = 4
*   OTHERS                     = 5
IF sy-subrc = 0.                                          "1375614
    CLEAR :spoolno,h_spoolids.
    READ TABLE h_output_info-spoolids INTO h_spoolids INDEX 1.
    IF h_spoolids IS NOT INITIAL.
      spoolno = h_spoolids.
      CONDENSE :spoolno.
      MESSAGE i155(id_wt) WITH spoolno.
      PERFORM update_cert_tables.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.
Can anyone Please help me to get TDS details on the Smartform.
Regards,
DivyaLalwani.
Edited by: kishan P on Feb 23, 2011 1:28 PM

Hi,
Achnowledgement details comes in table it_qrtrtab at run time in the smartform, you can dibug the program j_1iewt_cert and smartforms J_1iewt_cert where at run time you will able to see data avaialability, If values are not available in this internal table then check related notes given by SAP, I have already implemented this note and also faced same issue but my FI consultant has given me the related note and my issue was resolved.
Please checkout related notes and data population in the dibugger.
Regards,
Umang Mehta

SRM 4.0: Source of Supplier not copying in line item on Shopping Cart

We are using SRM 4.0 in an extended classic setup and currently experiencing a problem with the source of supplier not being copied on line items. The user stated that when copying a line items in a shopping cart the source of supplier is not copying to the new line. It happens sometimes but not everytime the client uses the line copy option.
It was initially thought that based on the amount of the line item (>=$25,000) that would cause the source of supplier (vendor) not to copy to the new line item but it has been verified by client that is not the case. If anyone has seen this issue and know of what the root cause could be please let me know.
Thanks

Yann,
Actually this is occurring when the user is creating a shopping cart from scratch. He added a line item either from catalog or free text, sources the item and then uses the copy function to copy the line item. When the client does this the item is copied but the vendor disappears from the 2nd line item and client has to add it again.
So that OSS notes doesn't apply unless I'm missing something.

Freight Charges are created as Separate Invoice not within the line items

Hi Folks,
I have a peculiar problem here :
I will assign the freight cost to the items that are getting shipped during shipping either to the lines or to the delivery,
I Ship the line and create autoinvoice master program.
Expect that one invoice is generated with the lines that is shipped with the freight charges included in the invoice.
But there are two invoices generated with line items on one invoice and freight charges on the other.
We have a setting where in the freight charges are shown as separate line in the invoice.
This issue cannot be reproduced at will. This is happening in some cases only...
Any pointers towards it...
Regards,
Prasad

Hi Lukasz,
I compared the item line and freight line in the RA_INTERFACE_LINES_ALL table....i see the following differences.
1) Shipment_number for item line is 2 and that of freight line is 0
2) Line_id is different for both
3) original_gl_date is populated only for the freight line.
4) customer_trx_id is different for both the lines.
I see since the customer_trx_id is different the invoices are different.
I think how did this populated differently..
I tried creating a test case wherein trying out same scenarios given in the point no.1,2,3. The system is generating one invoice with item and frieght in one invoice.
If the issue is with only customer_trx_id different. This field is an autogenerated sequence RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_S.nextval. How did this populate different sequence for item and freight lines?
Regards,
Prasad

Condition in purchase order not distributed in line items

Hi All,
    I have a condition ZD21 (delivery charges) in purchase order. When i enter the condition at header level, it supposed to distribute the charges among line items. However sap put the entire amount in one of the line items.   The condition has condition class A (surchage), Calc typ B(Fixed Amt) and B as cond cat.   Header condition is selected (not item).
   Sometimes system populate an amount at the header level for this delivery charge.
How can i get the amount to distribute to all line items ? Also, where is the populated amount coming from ? Anyone with any suggestions ?
thanks
joyce

Hi Tej,
Group condition and Header condition were selected. I noticed that for other plants, the delivery distribution works but not for this plant. This wouldn't have anything to do with plants, right ?
What is the group based on for Group Condition ?   Thanks.
Edited by: Joyce Chan on Jan 10, 2012 2:54 PM

F110 PAYMENT RUN NOT PICKING UP LINE ITEMS

Hi Everyone,
We use the APP functionality to pay customers credit memo. so when running F110, we indicate the credit memo document number in the further selection criteria in F110. It has always been working fine, but some customer that we have paid before, we ran F110 and it cleared some documents but did not clear the others. The line item is sitting in the customers account correctly and the payment terms is the one we have always used (2% 15 days net 30days).
What do you think i can check againg

hi Adeola,
See for running the F110 the payment must be overdue then only can able to run the APP run.
As you have mentioned in ur seetings only that the payment terms is set for 30 days.
As this payments is not yet overdue.
If you Run after 30 days then you can run the Payment run.
Please let me know, is this helpfull to u.....
Regards
Ranjit

Custom table Not deleting the line items on the order.

Hi All
I have an issue, In SAP we have created a custom table which is related to ship to party, as and when we delete any line items in the order(VBAP) it should update /delete the custom table but it is not deleting, while when we create any line items in the order (VBAP) it is updating the entries in the custom table which is suppose to happen.
Please let me know your inputs.
Thanks,
Ram

UPDKZ is not a field name. it is the processing status of a line or order.
If UPDKZ is I , its initial, like adding a new line
If UPDKZ is U, its update. Like changing or modifying an existing line
....so on...
Regards
Sai

Not adopting both line items

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for