Now, Enterprise Program at the join conditions, company size (over 500) is irrelevant?

Now, Enterprise Program at the join conditions, company size (over 500) is irrelevant?Now, Enterprise Program at the join conditions, company size (over 500) is irrelevant?

You can join the iOS Developer Enterprise Program with any company size, at least in the USA. You will, however, need to have a Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number. If you don't, you can apply for one which can take up to 30 days (unless you expedite).
More information is available on the program details at www.apperian.com/technote/Apple_iOS_Enterprise_Developer_Program

Similar Messages

What is the Join condition between mtl_system_items_b and mtl_onhand_quantities_detail

Hi,
What is the Join condition between mtl_system_items_b and mtl_onhand_quantities_detail?
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Babu

Please see the query in (Consolidate Onhand Quantity /Sum Quantity Zero in MTL_ONHAND_QUANTITIES_DETAIL (MOQD) / Concurrent Program Consolidate Inventory Onhand Quantities / Datafix for 0 Quantity Displayed For Finished Goods (Doc ID 353345.1)), is shows how to join those 2 tables.
http://etrm.oracle.com
Thanks,
Hussein

Creating a Relation between two Blocks - the Join Condition [SOLVED]

Hi. I'm trying to create a Relation between my TTMS_Audit table and my Bundle_Exceptions table. This is the join condition:
ttms_audit.primary_key_values = bundle_exceptions.project_cd||','||bundle_exceptions.bundle||','||bundle_exceptions.exception_cd
And I get the following error:
FRM-15004: Error while parsing join condition
Does anyone know if my concatenated values in the Join Condition are allowed? Can I even do this? Is there a logical work around?

Got it.
I first created the concatenated values as a non-base table item on my form:
:NBT_PRIMARY_KEY_VALUES := :bundle_exceptions.project_cd||','||:bundle_exceptions.bundle||','||:bundle_exceptions.exception_cd;
Then my join condition simply became:
ttms_audit.primary_key_values = bundle_exceptions.nbt_primary_key_values

How to make the join condition in a view with this tables LFBK LFA1 TIBAN?

Hi gurus,
how can I make the join conditions for those 4 tables LFBK LFA1 TIBAN and BNKA ?
thanx
Moderator message: please (re)search and try yourself first.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Nov 22, 2010 4:44 PM

Well, use
LFA1-LIFNR EQ LFBK-LIFNR
LFBK-BANKS EQ BNKA-BANKS
LFBK-BANKK EQ BNKA-BANKK
LFBK-BANKS EQ TIBAN-BANKS
LFBK-BANKK EQ TIBAN-BANKK
LFBK-BANKN EQ TIBAN-BANKN
LFBK-BKONT EQ TIBAN-BKONT
Not very hard...
Regards,
Raymond

SQL Join between two tables two columns, but the data in the join condition could be null.

hello all,
can anyone help me write an outer join b/n the two tables below. The joining condition has if's and or's.
table 1 has 2 million rows, table 2 is very small
TABLE1
CUSTOMER_ID
CITY
STATE
1
SKOKIE
IL
2
CHICAGO
IL
3
CARY
NC
ERIE
PA
PHILLY
PA
CHARLOTE
NC
2 MILLION
CITYXY
STATEX
TABLE2
CITY
STATE
CONTACT
IL
OJO
ERIE
BRITT
PA
MIKE
PITTSBURG
PA
HILTON
N043
TAT
affi
B
affi
R
b0b
Q
b0b
CHARLOTE
NC
b0b
problem :: for all the data in table1, I need to find out the CONTACT from table 2 And the join condition would be as below
1. either both TABLE1.CITY=TABLE2.CITY AND TABLE1.STATE=TABLE2.STATE and get CONTACT
OR
2. TABLE1.CITY=TABLE2.CITY AND TABLE2.STATE IS NULL and get the value of CONTACT
OR
3. TABLE1.STATE=TABLE2.STATE AND TABLE2.CITY is null and get the value of CONTACT
I need a query like this
SELECT A.CUSTOMER_ID, A.CITY, A.STATE, B.CONTACT
FROM TABLE1 A, TABLE2 B
WHERE (join condition fitting in the 3 condition mentioned above)

Dear OP,
Do you want something like this?
> with t1 as
-- Start of SAMPLE DATA
(select 1 CUSTOMER_ID, 'SKOKIE' CITY, 'IL' STATE from dual union
select 2, 'CHICAGO', 'IL' from dual union
select 3, 'CARY', 'NC' from dual union
select 4, 'ERIE', 'PA' from dual union
select 5, 'PHILLY', 'PA' from dual union
select 6, 'CHARLOTE', 'NC' from dual)
t2 as
(select null CITY, 'IL' STATE, 'OJO' CONTACT from dual union
select 'ERIE', null, 'BRITT' from dual union
select null, 'PA', 'MIKE' from dual union
select 'PITTSBURG', 'PA', 'HILTON' from dual union
select 'N043', 'TAT', 'affi' from dual union
select null,'B', 'affi' from dual union
select null,'R', 'b0b' from dual union
select null,'Q', 'b0b' from dual union
select 'CHARLOTE', 'NC', 'b0b' from dual
--- END IF SAMPLE Data
select * from t1 full outer join t2
on ( nvl(t1.city,t2.city) = nvl(t2.city,t1.city)
and nvl(t1.state,t2.state) = nvl(t2.state,t1.state) )
order by 1,2,3,4
CUSTOMER_ID CITY     STATE CITY      STATE CONTACT
          1 SKOKIE   IL              IL    OJO
          2 CHICAGO IL              IL    OJO
          3 CARY     NC
          4 ERIE     PA    ERIE            BRITT
          4 ERIE     PA              PA    MIKE
          5 PHILLY   PA              PA    MIKE
          6 CHARLOTE NC    CHARLOTE NC    b0b
                           N043      TAT   affi
                           PITTSBURG PA    HILTON
                                     B     affi
                                     Q     b0b
                                     R     b0b
12 rows selected
Elapsed: 00:00:00.112
Hope this is helpful. If not please let us know what is you desired result (sample) if your data was like above?
vr,
Sudhakar

How can I use the join condition for this query?

Hi, i am using a query which has a sun query in it, wen i am running tat query it is giving 9332 records, I changed the sub query logic and given an inner join, but it is giving only 4476 records. So, I changed it to left join but it is giving more records
than usual now, say 10033 records.
This is the code which is giving records 9332, which is correct
select distinct
b.SRC_PROV_ID
,COALESCE(a.SYSTEM_NAME, a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME, a.PROV_SMG_NAME) AS SYSTEM_NAME
INTO TINtoSystem
from
RARE.dbo.EDW_MASTER a
Inner Join RARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_ID_XREF b
on a.SMG_ID = b.SMG_ID
where SRC_PLATFORM_CD = 'TX'
and a.SMG_ID in
select distinct
SMG_ID
from RARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_ID_XREF
where SRC_PLATFORM_CD = 'TX'
and SRC_PROV_ID in (select q.PROV_TAX_ID from PACT.dbo.SQS_EDW_Source q)
I have changed this code by giving inner join as, but its not giving the exact records of 9332,
select distinct
b.SRC_PROV_ID
,COALESCE(a.SYSTEM_NAME, a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME, a.PROV_SMG_NAME) AS SYSTEM_NAME
INTO TINtoSystem
from
RARE.dbo.EDW_MASTER a
Inner Join RARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_ID_XREF b
on a.SMG_ID = b.SMG_ID
Inner Join Pact.dbo.SQS_EDW_Source q
on b.SRC_PROV_ID = q.PROV_TAX_ID
where b.SRC_PLATFORM_CD = 'TX'
Can anyone tell, where it is missing, I used left join also but its giving more records then, need help

Hi, If you insist inner joins then please try
SELECT DISTINCT
b.SRC_PROV_ID
,COALESCE(a.SYSTEM_NAME, a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME, a.PROV_SMG_NAME) AS SYSTEM_NAME
INTO TINtoSystem
FROM
RARE.dbo.EDW_MASTER a
Inner Join RARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_ID_XREF b
on a.SMG_ID = b.SMG_ID
inner join
select distinct
c.SMG_ID
from RARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_ID_XREF as c
where SRC_PLATFORM_CD = 'TX'
and exists (select * from PACT.dbo.SQS_EDW_Source q where c.SRC_PROV_ID=q.PROV_TAX_ID)
) as d on a.SMG_ID = d.SMG_ID
where b.SRC_PLATFORM_CD = 'TX'

I need to set values of 2 fields to 0 if the join condition is false

I'll try to explain what I need to do as clearly as possible . I have three sub queries in my data model . My layout is group left .
My first query :
SELECT ALL BOEPAY_HD.BPH_RECP_NO_,
BOE_PAY_HD.BPH_RECP_DATE, BOE_PAY_MODE.BPM_PAY_MODE, BOE_PAY_HD.BPH_ID,
BOE_PAY_HD.BPH_DEC_CODE, BOE_PAY_HD.BPH_NAME1, BOE_PAY_HD.BPH_IMP_EXP_CODE,
BOE_PAY_HD.BPH_SITE, BOE_PAY_HD.BPH_TOTAL, BOE_PAY_MODE.BPM_NUMBER
FROM BOE_PAY_HD, BOE_PAY_MODE
WHERE (BOE_PAY_HD.BPH_RECP_DATE BETWEEN TO_DATE(:st_date||' 00:00:00', 'dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') AND TO_DATE(:en_date||' 23:59:59', 'dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
AND (BOE_PAY_HD.BPH_RECP_NO = BOE_PAY_MODE.BPM_RECP_NO)
Second query :
It is linked to the first query with the primary key BPO_RECP_NO
SELECT ALL BOE_PAY_OTH.BPO_AMT, BOE_PAY_OTH.BPO_DTX_CODE,
BOE_PAY_OTH.BPO_RECP_NO
FROM BOE_PAY_OTH
On my report I display fields BOE_PAY_OTH.BPO_AMT, BOE_PAY_OTH.BPO_DTX_CODE in a repeating frame .
The problem is when there is no data in table BOE_PAY_OTH for a particular BPO_RECP_NO , the second sub query is not executed.
Columns(Values) in my layout overlap with values from the third query .
I need to find a way to set values BOE_PAY_OTH.BPO_AMT, BOE_PAY_OTH.BPO_DTX_CODE to zero and display them so that there is no overlapping .
Is there a way for me to achieve this .
Please help . Thanks.

This overlapping is usually dealt with in the layout by putting a frame in the appropriate place rather than in the queries. The frame stops items from
moving up the page.
Dave

I can't burn my playlist on several CDs anymore without stopping the process and going to the next selection of songs. First I could, now it re-burns the same selection of songs over and over again.

I was able to burn the whole contents of a playlist on several CDs in a row. When I do it now however it will re-burn the same selection over and over again without moving to the next. What can be done?

See Empty/corrupt library after upgrade/crash...
tt2

Master Detail Form is ignoring the 4th join condition

Hello All,
I have master detail relationship between two tables with a
composite foreign key (of 4 columns). I'm creating a master
detail form in O9iAS Portal 3.0.9.8.0 on these 2 tables
successfully with no errors. The only thing I have noticed, is
that the wizard does not populate the join conditions
automatically in step#3. The form runs Okay but it ignores the
last condition (i.e., 4th), which means that it brings too many
details records.
Any ideas
Much appreciated if you can CC me: [email protected]
Hamada Hima

I had this same problem with master/detail form and 4 join conditions. I opened up a TAR and after several weeks
Oracle determined this to be a bug and submitted it to developers.
For a work around, I created a view with two of the join fields concatenated together, then created another md form
with 3 join conditions and it worked. Good luck.

Mismatch in the datatypes in join conditions of the views

Hi guys,
For creating a view I am trying to join 2 tables( EUIINSTLN & EUFASS).
I have selected 4 fields in first table(EUIINSTLN) and 3 fields in the second table(EUFASS).
The join condition is in such a way that the first table field(EUIINSTLN-ANLAGE) is input to second table primary field(EUFASS-OBJKEY).
The first table field(EUIINSTLN-ANLAGE) is of 10 char length and the input field(EUFASS-OBJKEY) in the second table primary field(EUFASS-OBJKEY) is 70 characters in length.
When we take the value in the first table field(EUIINSTLN-ANLAGE) individually and give input( to EUFASS-OBJKEY) in the second table((EUFASS) it works fine even though there is mismatch in the datatypes. I.e., it works individually.
But when this data is viewed using the DDIC view it doens't show any records, since the field length condition is not met. i.e., mismatch in the datatypes takes place. The below is the condition I have given in the view - table/join condition.
EUIINSTLN     MANDT     =     EUFASS     MANDT
EUIINSTLN     ANLAGE     =     EUFASS     OBJKEY.
Some persons have said that I can delimit the 70 char field(EUFASS-OBJKEY) to 10 char.
How can I delimit the length of 70 characters field(EUFASS-OBJKEY) to 10 char in the join conditions of the view.
Appreciate if any one give any solution on this.
Regards
Mac

> EUIINSTLN     MANDT     =     EUFASS     MANDT
> EUIINSTLN     ANLAGE     =     EUFASS     OBJKEY.
Hi Mac,
You can limit the number of char in OBJKEY to 10.
Join Condition
EUIINSTLN-MANDT     =     EUFASS-MANDT
EUIINSTLN-ANLAGE      =     EUFASS-OBJKEY(10).
Best regards,
Shahid Malayil

More than one join condition for 2 tables in obiee

Hello,
I am using obiee 11g.
There are 2 tables tableA and tableB where the join condition is like (tableA.col1=tableB.col1) or (tableA.col1 is null and tableB.col1 is null)
where should i do these type of joins.
I tried putting in physcial layer->f(x) but giving error like here only columns an d opertaors are allowed.
Thanks

ok here it goes.
I have a tableA with columns col1(pk),col2 and other columns
I have tableB with columns col1(pk),col2..Only these 2 columns.
Now distinct tableA.col2 values are put in tableB.col2. For those distinct values i have put the tableB.col1 values.
Now tableA.col2 as well as tableB.col2 can be null beacuse there may be null values in tableA.col2.
Now in tableB i have added one more row which has col1 as value and col2 as null.
Now when in physical layer when i do tableA.col2=tableB.col2 i dont get the null values.
What i want is whenever the tableA.col2 and tableB.col2 is null then take tableB.col1 for those vales.
So when i query i do
select * from tableA,tableB where
((tableA.col2=tableB.col2) or (tableA.col2 is null and tableB.col2 is null))
What i want is when i do a join i should be able to give this OR condition in rpd thats it.
because when i do in where clause of content tab it goes like a AND condition and not OR.
Thanks
Edited by: user123 on Jul 5, 2011 1:57 PM

Problem in Spras field for join condition in creating new views

Hi,
I want to create a new view for three tables t1 t2 and t3 say.....i want to join this three tables like
table    field         table   field
t1      mandt     =   t2     mandt.
t1      vkbur      =   t2      vkbur.
And other condition is t2-spras = 'E' now.... how should i give this condition in the join condition as u have to give the other table name and the field name on the other side too..... table t1 has no filed in its table for the field spras.........so i just have to give t2-spras as 'E'. But this is throwing error...Please help

Hi,
1.u can specify the first thing i.e. t1 mandt = t2 mandt and t1 vkbur = t2 vkbur in the <b>join conditions</b> even if there is no relation ship b/w t1 and t2 on vkbur.simply u specify the join condition manually.
2.for the second thing....wat u did is rite.......
I think it will work.
Thanks ,
Jyothi.D
want to create a new view for three tables t1 t2 and t3 say.....i want to join this three tables like
table field table field
t1 mandt = t2 mandt.
t1 vkbur = t2 vkbur.
And other condition is t2-spras = 'E' now.... how should i give this condition in the join condition as u have to give the other table name and the field name on the other side too..... table t1 has no filed in its table for the field spras.........so i just have to give t2-spras as 'E'. But this is throwing error...Please help

Join condition validation error in owb 10gR2

Hi friends,
When I tried to validate the join condition in the mapping im getting the below error like
an error occurred during expression validation, bad expression return type
When I googled for the above error, I got the below link mentioning like a bug for that join condition validation problem
https://forums.oracle.com/thread/717194
In which it is mentioned like a BugNo: 7417869 for that issue.
Is there any fix for that bug??
Thanks in advance.
Brgds,
Mini

Dear Allan,
Happy to get reply from you and sorry for my late reply as im been stuck with other work
Like you said, I downloaded the required patch 4898608 for the validation bug in mapping with owb 10.2.0.4. By viewing the readme.txt file of the patch I followed the below steps like
Set the ORACLE_HOME environment variable to point to the OWB Home
Add $ORACLE_HOME/OPatch in the PATH
Stopped the runtime service using the supplied SQL*PLUS script stop_service.sql as a rep_owner
      OWB_HOME/rtp/sql/stop_service.sql
After the above three steps I applied the opatch like below in cmd prompt
C:\orahome\10gR3_1\OPatch>opatch version
Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.4.9
OPatch Version: 10.2.0.4.9
OPatch succeeded.
C:\OraHome_1\OPatch>opatch apply
Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.4.9
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.4.9
Copyright (c) 2009, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Oracle Home       : C:\OraHome_1
Central Inventory : C:\Program Files (x86)\Oracle\Inventory
   from           : n/a
OPatch version    : 10.2.0.4.9
OUI version       : 10.2.0.1.0
OUI location      : C:\OraHome_1\oui
Log file location : C:\OraHome_1\cfgtoollogs\opatch\opatch2013-06-24_18-14-27PM.
log
Patch history file: C:\OraHome_1\cfgtoollogs\opatch\opatch_history.txt
Failed to load the patch object. Possible causes are:
The specified path is not an interim Patch shiphome
Meta-data files are missing from the patch area
Patch location = C:\OraHome_1\OPatch
Details = PatchObject constructor: Input file "C:\OraHome_1\OPatch\etc\config\
actions" or "C:\OraHome_1\OPatch\etc\config\inventory" does not exist.
ApplySession failed: PatchObject constructor: Input file "C:\OraHome_1\OPatch\et
c\config\actions" or "C:\OraHome_1\OPatch\etc\config\inventory" does not exist.
System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
OPatch failed with error code = 73
C:\OraHome_1\OPatch>
Im not sure why the above error is occuring, kindly help me with that error.
Thanks in advance.
Brgds,
Mini

Joiner Join Condition changed automatically

Hi,
When one of the ingrp table operators has been added with new column and that new column is connected to the joiner, the join condition of the joiner automatically changes(randomly).
To give the steps to recreate (it doesnot occur all the time)
1.Take two source table operators.
2.join them through a joiner with the correct join condition like for example.
INGRP1.COLUMN1 = INGRP2.COLUMN1 AND
INGRP1.COLUMN2=INGRP2.COLUMN2
3.Take the output from OUTGRP1 to the target table.
4.Generate the map and they are correct until now.
5.Now add one column to the first source table operator(manually or by synchronize).
6.Drag that column into the joiner and then save.
7.Generate the map now to see the condition would have become something like
INGRP1.COLUMN1 = INGRP2.COLUMN9 AND
INGRP1.COLUMN2=INGRP2.COLUMN10
Couldnot find out in what exact condition this mismatch occurs.
Has anyone faced this issue earlier.
Regards
Ganesh

Yes the joiner is something you have to be careful with.
For example, you can also have this problem.
1. 2 source tables are joined.
2. ingroup1.col1 = ingroup2.col1 (for example)
3. You decide to take a few columns from both tables as the joiner's 'out' group.
4. You then realize that you can't use one of the columns that is being brought in from ingroup1.
5. The column is removed from the ingroup1 table operator, and it is removed from the 'input' portion of the joiner.
6. It looks like it is also removed from the 'output' portion of the joiner....and it is. BUT...
7. Sometimes removing something from the joiner causes the output values to 'shift'.
example:
joiner input: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 joins with 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4
output is 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4
now we decide we don't need to bring in 2.2 at all.
it is removed from the incoming table operator and the ingroup of the joiner.
it is then removed from the outgroup of the joiner.
however the values simply shift in the absence of 2.2. Observe:
output is 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.3, 2.4
^ ^
2.2 2.3
so sometimes the outgroups get bound to the missing value and they all 'shift'
watch for this. I've seen many it happen to many people even after reconciling and synchronizing and so forth.
Message was edited by:
Greg Partenach

Infoset Join condition on Key feilds and data fields

Hi Guys,
I have a requirement to biuld the Info set with join conditon on two DSO's the info objects which i am using in the JOin condition are defined as data fieds in one DSO and defined as key fields in another DSO, is it possible to define join condition on key fields and data fields.
The two info objects are
                       0AC_DOC_NO
                       0ITEM_NUM
These two info objects are defined as data fields in DSO :   0LIV_DS1   Invocie verificaion
                                                        key fields in DSO:    0FIAP_0o3 FI AP Line Item
Please suggest me is it possible to define join the condtion on the data fields and key feilds.
Thanks
Best regards
SG

Hi
yes you can create join, you will get any issue in reporting level.
example: Say i want to create Info Set on 0MATERIAL and Sales DSO.
In 0MATERIAL Info Object it is key filed, but in my DSO 0MATERIAL is data field.Still we can create
Creation of join is dependent on fields common in your source objects.
check out the below document
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/2f5aa43f-0c01-0010-a990-9641d3d4eef7?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
Regards,
Venkatesh
Edited by: Venkateswarlu Nandimandalam on Sep 27, 2011 2:26 AM

Now, Enterprise Program at the join conditions, company size (over 500) is irrelevant?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for