NumberFormatException with Performance Manager charts

I'm running an Oracle 9.2.0.1 on Suse Linux 7.3.
Everything is fine so far with the OEM, but
if I want to show charts in the Performance Manager,
lots of java.lang.NumberFormatException(s) are thrown.
Is there any help available?
Thanks

The certification process of Oracle is done with SLES-7 which is the professional Version of SuSE Linux, not with the standard SuSE package.
Kernel-, Libraries-, and JavaRunTime are the versions required by Oracle.
Everything with this installation works fine, also OEM. Except the charts in the performance manager.

Similar Messages

ECM integration with Performance Management

I am trying to integrate the Appraisals with ECM. The required configuration is done in SPRO. The problem which I face is that the number assigned to the appraisal template is different in the development box and in the quality box. I tried to configure external number range for appraisal template but the system still automatically asigns the internal number.
Has any one of you successfully done the ECM integration with Performance Manageemnt? How did you go about the different number issue?

Could not get the number range working. Transported the templates instead.

.rec file with performance manager how read ?

Hi!
I recorded performance data via performance manager
I dont know how re-read the .rec file generated by this tools
could you help me ?

Hi badang,
To Import Second file please follow these steps:
In Import Manager after you import your first file then go to <b>File --> Connect to Source</b> in import manager, a new window comes then specify your second file name and perform Import normally.
Regarding the Get the second source i found this documentation from reference guide:
The Port drop-down list includes an entry for each inbound port you define in the MDM Console for the selected Remote System; those that do not have files waiting or are locked by another user are disabled in the drop-down list. When you select a port, the
MDM Import Manager automatically selects the first source data file that is waiting to be processed; you can then use the Get Next Source File command to select each succeeding file.
Thanks and Regards,
<b>Sagar Sonje
Mark Helpful Answers</b>

Performance Manager Problem with Starting

Hello
I am new to Administration and have a proplem in OEM Diagnostic pack related with Performance manager, any help in this regard is highly appreciated...
I am not able to start datagatherer on my system with windows 2000 professional edition.
every time i try to start the service OracleOraHome8IDataGatherer I get
Error:1067: The process terminated unexpectedly.
and at Performance manager I get
VTM-0005 error connecting to server
java.net.connectException: connection refused..
Also i encountered an error during installation of diagnostic pack.
OLE initialize of OCX load error while registering OCX
output of InstallActions.log
Starting install install phase 1 of component Oracle Enterprise Manager Packs and Management Infrastructure
Calling action w32OcxRegActions1.7.0.17.0 RegisterOCX
OcxPath = C:\Oracle\Ora81\bin\mmdx32.ocx
WorkingDir = C:\Oracle\Ora81\bin
Exception thrown from action: RegisterOCX
Exception Name: ErrorRegisteringOCXException
Exception String: OLE initialize or OCX load error while registering OCX
Exception Severity: 0
Exception handling set to prompt user with options to RETRY IGNORE
User choice : Retry

Increate the virtual memory and try to start the service here:
SELECT START > CONTROL PANEL > ADMINISTRATIVE TOOLS > SERVICES
Joel Pérez

Performance Management Installation problem

Hi all
I'm in a big trouble with Performance Management XI installation on a BO XI R2 environment.
When I reach the CMS logon information, the CMS box is left blank by default, so I fill it and I got the following error:
"Logon Information for the CMS is invalid"
But when using java launchpad I can enter CMS with the same information (username, password, and authentication).
Anyone knows a file or something else where setup file looks for CMS configuration info?
thanks in advance
marco

Hello Marco,
I recommend to post this query to the [BusinessObjects Enterprise Administration|BI Platform; forum.
This forum is dedicated to topics related to administration and configuration of BusinessObjects Enterprise, BusinessObjects Edge, and Crystal Reports Server.
It is monitored by qualified technicians and you will get a faster response there.
Also, all BOE Administration queries remain in one place and thus can be easily searched in one place.
Best regards,
Falk

Regarding Performance managment Report(Complex)

Hi Experts,
i am facing problem with performance management reoprt:FM:HRHAP_DOCUMENT_GET_DETIAL in this function module gettting tables are t_bod_elements, t_body_coumns,t_body_cell_note tables here relanships are not clear like foreign_type Foreign_id are getting from While checking conditon Row_IID = coloumn is it correct or not if i am wrong correct me and one more thing
after getting Foregin_id,Foreing_type i want delivery method getting from table HRp5007 Foregin_id,Foreing_type passing we can get the details but security reasons they sugeest use Fm but i dont know which Fm suitable for this getting this data can you flow logic for this requirement.
along with i have get the details from 1042 like same valuese need to pass (Forien_type , Foregn_id), and from qualification acquired form 1001 by passing Foreign_type and Foreign_id , if i am wrong just correct me .
thanks in advance.
Raju.

Hi Experts,
i am facing problem with performance management reoprt:FM:HRHAP_DOCUMENT_GET_DETIAL in this function module gettting tables are t_bod_elements, t_body_coumns,t_body_cell_note tables here relanships are not clear like foreign_type Foreign_id are getting from While checking conditon Row_IID = coloumn is it correct or not if i am wrong correct me and one more thing
after getting Foregin_id,Foreing_type i want delivery method getting from table HRp5007 Foregin_id,Foreing_type passing we can get the details but security reasons they sugeest use Fm but i dont know which Fm suitable for this getting this data can you flow logic for this requirement.
along with i have get the details from 1042 like same valuese need to pass (Forien_type , Foregn_id), and from qualification acquired form 1001 by passing Foreign_type and Foreign_id , if i am wrong just correct me .
thanks in advance.
Raju.

Error on Flexible Performance Management Appraisal Document

Hello Experts,
We are in the process of building Performance Management using Enhancement Package 4 in ECC 6.0. I am having issues with getting the Appraisal Document to work for MSS. Just to clarify too, I have no experience with Performance Management and the fact that we are using Enhancement package 4, our Functional consultants are not sure what to expect either. One more thing, the SICF service is activated.
*) When trying to preview the Appraisal Document (com.sap.pct.erp.mss.hap_document), I am receiving a Portal Run Time error.
*) When I go into SE80, I am using Package u2018PAOC_HAP_DOCUMENT_WD_UIu2019 to run a test on Web Dynpro Application HAP_MAIN_DOCUMENT, I am receiving u2018Access via 'NULL' object reference not possible.u2019
*) When I go into SE80, I am using Package u2018PAOC_HAP_DOCUMENT_WD_UIu2019 to run a test on Web Dynpro Configuration HAP_AC_MAIN_DOC, I am receiving u201Cu2018Error in Calling Up Applicationu2019 The Web Dynpro application was called up with the wrong URL parametersu201D.
QUESTIONS:
1) Do I have to implement Generic Performance Management (com.sap.pct.erp.mss.14.generic_performance_management) to call the appraisal document?
2) Is there any special configuration that needs to be done to make the HAP_MAIN_DOC work (portal or R/3)?
3) Do I need to manually create an SICF service for this?
4) Is there any documentation on how to implement the Flexible?
Any direction would be appreciated.
Thank you,
Mike

Hello H2R,
I copied the Iview Generic Performance Management (com.sap.pct.erp.mss.14.generic_performance_management) with Application Name 'HAP_START_PAGE_POWL_UI_MSS' and the Application Configuration Name 'HAP_START_PG_POW_MSS_AC'.
Activated the SICF services of 'hap_main_document', 'HAP_START_PG_POW_MSS_AC', 'HAP_START_PAGE_POWL_UI_MSS. Also, I would activate the services that begin with 'HAP' that l thought that I would need.
In SE80, there are 2 locations to find these Applications: 1) Web Dynpro Comp./Intf. = FPM_OIF_COMPONENT and 2) Package = PAOC_HAP_DOCUMENT_WD_UI.
As for the notes, we are on SAPK-60420INEAHRGXX, these are the notes that we applied:
1468466 - PM Launchpad Config
1463821 - PM Portal Config
1416756 - OBN Config in PM
1408243 - Config for OBN
Hope this helps,
Mike

Performance Management (Appraisal Documents) ABAP webdynpro error on HTTPS

Hello all,
Please help , in resolving the issue with Performance Management Application "Appraisal Documents" getting Blanks Screen on the routing back from "Appraisal Document" after user close the application. Issue is only applicable in 'HTTPs' and work fine in internal network.
On HTTP Watch : "ERROR_HTTP_INVALID_SERVER_RESPONSE" in the trace.
Steps to replicate :
1. User click on the "Appraisal Documents" link on the Area page and open the application on the new window.
2. User select one of the "Appraisal document" from the list available to work on it , which result in another window.
3. User close the application after finishing the work on the "Appraisal Document" and return on the Parent window "Appraisal Documents".
4. At this point "Appraisal Documents " window get refresh and every things looks great.
5. Now if user want to select another appraisal document to work on it in "Appraisal documents" window, it freeze or give blank screen.
Thanks in advance.

Hello surya,
is the problem solved?
Best regards Oliver

Unable to get the employee name in performance Management

Hi All,
I am facing problem with Performance Management in My Employment. Unable to see the employee name in PM docs to approve by manager.But same user is able to see in Backend under manager who has to be approve..Please assist to go further. Is there anything need to be done from portal side.?
Thanks & Regards,
Kumar. V.

Hello Sainth,
In Webi Prompts..you can see the "Key icon" click on that icon..it will show both text and key..it will helps you to run the report based on the Key..
Regards,
Naveen D

Oracle Performance Management - Notifications to Plan Population Members

All:
I've been working with Performance Management for several years and am implementing for a customer now. They are on R12.1.3 RUP6. We're creating notifications to be administered by the Performance Management Admin and the customer has asked for some simple definitions of the Plan Population Members & Statuses. I created this matrix, based on my own understanding and assumptions and wanted to see if anyone could validate to be sure I have these definitions correct. Please note that in the "Who Received The Message" column, where "worker" is listed in the matrix, I have only used the term "employee" since the customer is not evaluating contingent workers. I realize worker could be either an employee or contingent worker.
Could anyone please tell me where I may have gotten the "Who Receives the Message" definitions wrong? I've checked online documentation and there isn't anything I could find that makes an attempt to map this.
Thank you,
Mark
Plan Population
Who Receives The Message
All managers in the plan
All Managers who have active, eligible employees or terminated employees (during the appraisal period).
All eligible workers for the plan
All employees, regardless of their status in the plan.
All managers with at least one ongoing appraisal
Managers who have not completed all appraisals for their employees. These will be in “Ongoing with Manager” status
All workers with appraisal pending feedback
Employees, whose managers have submitted their performance appraisals to them, complete with Overall Rating and Performance Summary and are awaiting their response.
All workers with at least one ongoing appraisal
Employees who still have an appraisal sitting with them in draft form, not submitted to their manager.
All managers with at least one incomplete scorecard
Managers with employees who have not completed their scorecards
All managers with at least one scorecard pending for review
Managers who haven’t completed the review of at least one employee’s goals
All managers with at least one scorecard not yet started
This is when the manager begins the goal-setting process (cascading approach) and who have not started creating their employees’ goals (at least one).
All managers with at least one scorecard in transfer
Managers have transferred the employee’s goals back to them and the employee has not returned
All managers with at least one scorecard transferred out
Managers who have updated their employee’s goals and have transferred them to the employee for review.
All workers with an incomplete scorecard
Employees who have started working on their goals, but have not completed them and they are still in draft.
All workers with scorecard pending for managers review
Employees who have submitted their goals to the manager, but the managers has not acted on (updated or approved) the scorecard.
All workers with scorecard not yet started
Employees who have an active scorecard, but have not opened it, started writing or saving the record.
All workers with scorecard in transfer
Employees who have transferred their goals back to their manager.
All workers with scorecard transferred out
Employees who have transferred their goals from one plan to another plan (e.g., from Student Plan to Lab Regular Plan)
All workers with scorecard pending with them
Employees who have received their goals back and need to review and resubmit.
An individual worker or manager (can select from list of values)
This is an option when generating a notification. You can select a single person and use a notification expressly for hers or his benefits.

Sanjay,
As always, thank you for responding and for your insight. Your clarifications and thoughts here really helped. I am also going to post what I received back from Bina Kulkarni at Oracle. This might be helpful for anyone here looking for additional clarification on the WPM Notifications. Thanks again for your help!
Take care,
Mark
Plan Population
Who Receives The Message
Comments
All managers i the plan
All Managers who have active, eligible employees or terminated employees (during the appraisal period).
Terminated managers will no longer be part of the plan population & hence will not receive any messages.
All eligible workers for the plan
All employees, regardless of their status in the plan.
All managers with at least one ongoing appraisal
Managers who have not completed all appraisals for their employees. These will be in “Ongoing with Manager” status
All workers with appraisal pending feedback
Employees, whose managers have submitted their performance appraisals to them, complete with Overall Rating and Performance Summary and are awaiting their response.
All workers with at least one ongoing appraisal
Employees who still have an appraisal sitting with them in draft form, not submitted to their manager.
Here the Appraisal can be in Planned or Saved status.
All managers with at least one incomplete scorecard
Managers with employees who have not completed their scorecards
All managers with at least one scorecard pending for review
Managers who haven’t completed the review of at least one employee’s goals
All managers with at least one scorecard not yet started
This is when the manager begins the goal-setting process (cascading approach) and who have not started creating their employees’ goals (at least one).
All managers with at least one scorecard in transfer
Managers have transferred the employee’s goals back to them and the employee has not returned
Points 10 & 11 below seem the be the same. I think both cases talk about Managers who have set goals for their employees and transferred the scorecard to the employees for their review.
All managers with at least one scorecard transferred out
Managers who have updated their employee’s goals and have transferred them to the employee for review.
Same as above
All workers with an incomplete scorecard
Employees who have started working on their goals, but have not completed them and they are still in draft.
All workers with scorecard pending for managers review
Employees who have submitted their goals to the manager, but the managers has not acted on (updated or approved) the scorecard.
When employees transfer their scorecard to their managers, the manager can either approve the objectives in the scorecard or Approve and finish objective setting, whereby the scorecard status changes to 'Published' and can no longer be worked upon.
All workers with scorecard not yet started
Employees who have an active scorecard, but have not opened it, started writing or saving the record.
All workers with scorecard in transfer
Employees who have transferred their goals back to their manager.
All workers with scorecard transferred out
Employees who have transferred their goals from one plan to another plan (e.g., from Student Plan to Lab Regular Plan)
Transferred out means the employee is transferred out of the plan due to hierarchy changes, eligibility changes or termination. In this case the transferred out scorecard is no longer visible amd the objectives from such a scorecard cannot be retrieved.
All workers with scorecard pending with them
Employees who have received their goals back and need to review and resubmit.
This means that the employees have not completed objective setting from their end.
An individual worker or manager (can select from list of values)
This is an option when generating a notification. You can select a single person and use a notification expressly for hers or his benefits.
I think you are referring to an Ad-Hoc approver here.
All Appraisal Participants
Appraisers, Reviewers or Other Participants who have not completed their appraisal feedback about the employee.
All Approvers
Approvers of appraisals (AME defined or added Ad-hoc)

BO Performance Management

Hi,
Need advise here.
With Performance Manager being End Of Life, what will be the replacing software for it? None?
But my understanding is that although Crystal Xcelsius can be used to create dashboard, but there are several features in Performance Manager but not in Crystal Xcelsius.
Thanks and regards,
Serene

Hi Steve,
Looks like your question relates to a hosted SSM Model. Just before diving into the technical details, what motivation did you see for creating a shared SSM infrastructure?
FYI: I am based in the SAP Kenya Office

Difference between Performance Manager and XCelsius

Can anybody outline the differences/provide a document which would help me understand the differences between the working of Performance Manager and XCelsius?
Can Performance Manager be substituted with XCelsius and can XCelsius be integrated with Performance Manager?
Thanks,
Karthik Mohan

I think your problem may be able to be solved by Dashboard Builder. It can embed the Xcelsius

Performance Management: 'Share with Main Appraiser' button not visible

Hi Gurus,
I am using Oracle R12.1.3, Performance Management module.
I am trying to publish Performance Management Plan with Objective setting and Appraisals both tasks. Appraisal plan is set to be appraisee initiated, standard appraisal
However - When the appraisee is trying to initiate the appraisal (by clicking 'Update' on the appraisal task appeared) - s/he sees all the objectives set and get to choose a performance rating. However - the button 'Share with Main Appraiser' button is not visible.
When I am trying to create a Performance Management Plan with only 'Appraisals' - this problem is not occurring. Any clue as to how to rectify this problem?
PS - I have tried disabling personalizations and re-tried several times - but the same error occurs.
Would really appreciate any response which might help.
Thanks and Regards,
Rahul

I'm thankful for your effort Hussein. However, this document is applicable for version 12.1.4+ while I am working on 12.1.3. I re-tested the thing after making some changes in appraisal template where I ticked 'Update Appraisals for Terminated Workers' and also checking 2 more related check-boxes. Surprisingly it worked.
Also if I am selecting method for objective allocation as 'Parallel' - then also this error is not occurring - even with old appraisal template. Although this hit and trial worked, I do not have a logical view about the solution and correctness in all environments yet.

Performance management with ESS and no MSS??

Hello Gurus,
I have a very peculiar scenario regarding and ESS/MSS.
Let me first post our requirments:
We have implemented all modules of HR along with OM and now in the process of implementing Performance Management along with ESS only . I am stressing on ESS only here with NO MSS functionality.
Now my question is..is it really possible in the first place to have a performance management functionality without MSS and just with standalone ESS? If yes, what are the options that I have to configure the performance management system and the ESS system so that the workflows for Planning, Rating an employee, and Approvals regarding appraisals can be achieved??
Is it possible to assign an ESS role to the manager and then when the manager logs in ESS, he/she can go ahead with the performance management process and can check employees just like the way it happens in MSS?
Thanks a lot for your time.
Best Regards.
Karan.

Hi,
In your case check for HR administrator for final ratings and other things also check for r/3 desktop services.
but why they are not going for mss, om is in place right
regards
rafi

Performance management with ONLY ESS and NO MSS??

Hello Gurus,
I have a very peculiar scenario regarding and ESS/MSS.
Let me first post our requirments:
We have implemented all modules of HR along with OM and now in the process of implementing Performance Management along with ESS only . I am stressing on ESS only here with NO MSS functionality.
Now my question is..is it really possible in the first place to have a performance management functionality without MSS and just with standalone ESS? If yes, what are the options that I have to configure the performance management system and the ESS system so that the workflows for Planning, Rating an employee, and Approvals regarding appraisals can be achieved??
Is it possible to assign an ESS role to the manager and then when the manager logs in ESS, he/she can go ahead with the performance management process and can check employees just like the way it happens in MSS?
Thanks a lot for your time.
Best Regards.
Karan.

Dear Karan,
Firstly, it is not mandatory to implement MSS for approvals/notifications...
Manager in MSS term is used to refer Head of Unit (in general) and not the immediate supervisor, i.e, relation ship (012).
UWL - Universal Work List is the place where all work items for approval is listed and this can be activated in ESS with out using MSS functionality also.
Comming to Performance Managment: Yes it can be acheived. NO MSS is required for Appraisals.
if you are using BSP applications, there are different pages available for employee view, and manager view..\
all that u need to do is, use the appropriate pages in the links that you gonna provide in ESS>Performance Management.
SAP has given provision to create your own notifications (workflow) in configurations. Create a Z Event and ask your ABAPer to send a notification based on that Z Event. This all is standard.
Regards
...Sadhu

NumberFormatException with Performance Manager charts

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for