Object deleted

Hello all, please I have this issue: I deleted a vendor in the organizational model of vendors in SRM.
I went to web transaction, manage business partners, and when I search this business partner and try to delete it, the system throws this message: Business partner cannot be deleted because there are documents created with it. I need to put this vendor in the organizational model again, what can I do? If I try to go to vendors node and try to assign this business partner, the system doesn´t allow me the change.
Thanks in advance
Rosa

Hi. Interesting. It also failed to work for me. I am 99.9% sure this used to work. Sorry about that.
Right, on with plan B.
I first created a new vendor, then created a cart and a PO on the new vendor.
Then I went to transaction BP, put in my new vendor and went to change mode, and went to the status tab and ticked the "archiving" flag.
I then ran BUP_BUPA_DELETE.
It completely deleted the vendor and the VENMAP entry as well.
I then replicated the vendor again using BBPGETVD.
It worked fine and I was able to use the vendor again.
Regards,
Dave.

Similar Messages

  • Objects deleted under transport request by me-how can I know what were dele

    I am using my collegue's user id and password.
    I was creating data element and adding it to segment in we31 and then I did program change in se38.
    Unfortunatley, I was created all the above under my colleague's existing transport request which contains so many objects.  After I realised, I deleted some to create all under a fresh request ( it seems some which are not related to my development were also deleted . so how can i find what ever were I deleted ? ) ...not sure what was I deleted...may be one program, one transaction code etc.
    Kindly help me how to find out what were I deleted under that request  ?
    YOUR HELP WILL BE HIGHLY APPRECIATED.

    There is no easy way to find it out. Something you can do that you can find out the object list from TADIR table which is created by your friend and then go to E070 table and E071 table and check among those objects which are not attached with any transport request.
    So thus you will get a smaller list of objects and your friends objects ( deleted by you) will be definitely in that smaller list. Now you can check with your friends so ensure which are the objects deleted by you.

  • How to find Object delete information when Audit is not enabled.

    Hello Experts,
    One of the object is deleted from our environment .
    I tried fetching the deskin report frm acitvity universe but , no data availble as the audit option is not enabled .
    Is there any way to get the information of object deleted , like who deleted it.
    This is very import isssue to find out the information can any one help me with it.
    Regards,

    Hi Neo, in addition, I suggest you to remove any right to delete any object if it is in the Production environment.
    If you are using the BusinessObjects tool, you should join ASUG at www.asug.com

  • ICE Differential package upload - object deletion

    I am having an issue with uploading a differential package into another KM repository. As I understand, a differential package will download the data necessary for an incremental update, i.e. any renamed, new or deleted objects will be updated in the target repository.
    The issue that I am seeing is that when I delete an object from the source KM, and run through the usual steps:
    - create a link to the node that the deleted object was under (other objects still exist)
    - create a differential package (root > ice > root  >  ice  >  Syndicator  >  Global Offer > differential package)
    - save the zip to local
    - upload the package to the new environment using: Content Management > Content Exchange > Package Upload
    The deleted object is not removed from this environment. Am I missing a step, doing something wrong or is the deletion just not possible? Any help would be appreciated,
    thanks
    James
    Message was edited by: James West

    Hi James,
      Have you received a reponse to this yet, as the problem I am facing seems to be almost identical to this.
    Thanks,
    Gary

  • Temporary object deleted too late...

    #include <string>
    #include <memory>
    class A{
    pubilc:
       const std::string& getId() const{ return i_id;}
    private:
       const std::string i_id;
    namespace{
    std::auto_ptr<A>
    return_autoptr_object(const char* arg)
      A* const ret = new A(/*arg*/);
      return std::auto_ptr<A>(ret);
    int main()
        const std::string myID=return_autoptr_object("test_autoptr")->getId();
        typedef void end_of_block_scope;
        std::cout << "*** out of scope here ****" << std::endl;
      return 0;
    }The code above shows that a temporary object(returned by return_autoptr_object(..)) is deleted only AFTER(?) "out of scope here" line being printed. I expected it should be deleted right after it's being assigned its' id to "myID", where the checkpoint for that function exists, and NOT when it goes out of scope (of the block).
    I tested it with other two compilers(gcc and visual age c++), both yield to the same expected result, only sun CC had diff result.
    Possibly it's a bug?

    Just a quick remark: It is with sunstudio 12 that lifetimes become standard. SunStudio 11 still has the same old behavior.
    #include <iostream>
    struct testerClass
            testerClass() {}
            ~testerClass() {std::cout << "Destructor for testerClass" << std::endl;}
            void doit() {std::cout << "doit invoked" << std::endl;}
    int main()
            testerClass().doit();
            std::cout << "Out of scope by now" << std::endl;
    }a) /opt/SUNWspro/v11/bin/CC main.cc
    doit invoked
    Out of scope by now
    Destructor for testerClass
    b) /opt/SUNWspro/v11/bin/CC -features=tmplife main.cc
    doit invoked
    Destructor for testerClass
    Out of scope by now
    version of "/opt/SUNWspro/v11/prod/bin/../../bin/cc": Sun C 5.8 Patch 121015-04 2007/01/10

  • Objects deletion through policy object manager

    Hi,
    I have a query, I need to remove list of objects which are not referred tro any rules through policy object manager of CSM. Now as per our deployment> first we need open an acitvity in CSM> Open Policy Object Manager> Delete object whichever require>approve the activity.
    So now my question is that do we need any deployment job for this? If not, than it is gone live straight?
    My implimentors says we do not need any deployment jobs as we do not made any policy changes of any firewall.

    LV2009 added a function which is probably crucial to delivering a nice solution to this problem. The function is called Preserve Run-time Class. It allows you to propogate the strict type of an object through a subVI that is coded to operate on a more generic class type.
    Here's an example written in LV2009 for a simple class that stores any other LV class object by name.
    Jarrod S.
    National Instruments
    Attachments:
    Temp.zip ‏33 KB

  • Transporting PI/XI object deletions beyond the first target system?

    Hello,
    we're running PI7.0 at the site I'm working at, and our PI transports are controlled via CMS.
    I'm experiencing a problem in transporting Deletions of integration directory objects.
    From Development to the first target Test system, the Deletions are moved through fine. This 'D' --> 'T 'transport forms the first track.
    The second track moves the same transports from 'Q' (after being assembled and approved out of 'T') to 'I' and then to 'M' systems.
    However, beyond the 'T' system, the Deletion objects seem to disappear off the transport!
    Other items on the same transport (eg. object creations or changes), still get transported fine.
    The outcome is that we seem to only be able to delete objects via transport in the first target system, not any follow-on systems.
    Does anyone know what could be causing the problem?
    many thanks
    DaveR

    Hi Marco,
    For Java development, you will still use NWDI until the assembly step. The result will be a software component archive, which can then be moved over to CTS+.
    For XI development, it is possible to use CTS+ instead of of CMS at the transport technology.
    You also might want to take a look into the following document, which highlights the combination of CTS+ and NWDI:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a0d96022-9df5-2910-90b8-8e0580e0987e
    Interesting quote:
    "Usage type DI is by no means invalidated by this [CTS+] scenario: The NWDI is the recommended environment for JAVA-based development."
    Best regards,
    Dennis

  • Privately owned object delete problem

    If I delete a privately owned object (B), AND delete its parent (object A, contains B), then the order of SQL deletes is incorrect:
    DELETE FROM A
    DELETE FROM B
    If I just delete object A, then Toplink orders deletes properly:
    DELETE FROM B
    DELETE FROM A
    NOW, the question is, can something be done to fix this because not deleting a privately owned object is not an option (its a long story, but there is a business logic related to this that deletes A when no more B's left, but there is no way to know that up front).
    Thanks
    - rustam -

    There is a previous thread regarding some similar issues:
    Order of delete in unit of work
    The last 2 or 3 posts make me wonder if the issue is similar to the one you are experiencing.
    Does that thread help?

  • BO Extension - how to detect object deletion?

    Hi community.
    I have the problem that we extended an SAP BO node and this BO node might get deleted by user interaction using SAP floorplans.
    However to prevent associations from our custom BOs to this extended SAP BO node pointing into the void I need to somehow react on deletion of this BO node.
    Our own floorplans following these associations and showing content from the SAP BO node throw exceptions if the SAP BO node does not exist anymore.
    the afterModify or beforeSave events of the extended BO do not work: both are (afaik) not triggered upon deletion.
    Did anybody else encounter a similar problem and maybe found a solution?
    More specific: we exended the SAP Project BO and have trouble when a ProjectTask is deleted.

    Hi Sunil, thanks for your answer.
    I already to check for IsSet on the ProjectTask but the assoviation was set even though the destination object was not existent anymore.
    The Idea about counting the project tasks is a good additional idea, i will try to explore into this direction.
    However, how could I solve the problem when the exception gets thrown by UI?
    I.e. when viewing floorplans (no changes made to object so far -> no events/actions with custom code triggered) the UI interpreter follows these associations and tries to load the relevant object to show  the project task data.
    I might save a local copy of this data maybe...
    Best regards,
    Ludger

  • Multiple Objects Deletion

    When Highlighting Multiple Objects and Purge (Recyclebin) or Delete, a repetative confirmation dialog is asked for each object, would like to see "yes for all" functionality in dialog.
    Regards

    You can vote for the existing request at the SQL Developer Exchange, to add weight for possible sooner implementation.
    Regards,
    K.

  • Objects Deleted from Transport Request

    Hi All,
    I deleted around half of my objects from a Transport Rrequest by mistake, can anybody tell me how can I get them back(OS level, any TCODE, etc.).
    Thanks,
    Nimit.

    Hi Nimit,
    You can try doing this.
    1. Identify all the objects that you want to add to the transport and create a separate transport. Merge the 2 transports ( the new transport and the transport with the remaining objects ).
    2. Go to the transport and click on Objects tab, try to add your objects one by one to this objects list. Save it and your transport is ready.
    Thanks,
    Guru

  • Temporary objects deleted to soon?

    bash-3.2$ uname -a
    SunOS solaris 5.11 snv_86 i86pc i386 i86pc
    bash-3.2$ CC -V
    CC: Sun C++ 5.9 SunOS_i386 2007/11/15
    I believe that the C++ compiler is producing incorrect results with respect
    to the creation and destruction of temporary variables when using operator
    overloading.
    The code sample below is compiled using:
    bash-3.2$ CC -o huh6.exe huh6.C -features=tmplife -features=strictdestrorder
    // begin code: huh6.C
    #include  <stdio.h>
    #include  <stdlib.h>
    class AClass {
    public:
        double *a;
        AClass( double x = 0 );
        ~AClass( void ) {
            //printf("<<<AClass variable deleted>>>\n");
            delete [] a;
        AClass& operator=( const AClass &right );
        friend AClass operator+( const AClass &left, const AClass &right );
    AClass::AClass( double x ) {
        a = new double[1];
        a[0] = x;
        //printf("***AClass variable created***\n");
    AClass& AClass::operator=( const AClass &right ) {
        a[0] = right.a[0];
        return( *this );
    AClass operator+( const AClass &left, const AClass &right ) {
        AClass tmp;
        tmp.a[0] = left.a[0] + right.a[0];
        return( tmp );
    int main() {
        AClass f, g, x, y, z;
        x.a[0] = 1.0; 
        y.a[0] = 2.0;
        z.a[0] = 3.0;
        f = x + y + z;
        printf("(1) f.a = %e\n", f.a[0]);
        g = x + y;
        g = g + z;
        printf("(2) g.a = %e\n", g.a[0]);
        return(0);
    // end code huh6.C
    Execution of the program yields:
    bash-3.2$ ./huh6.exe
    (1) f.a = 3.000000e+00
    (2) g.a = 6.000000e+00
    The expected result is
    (1) f.a = 6.000000e+00
    (2) g.a = 6.000000e+00
    By uncommenting the printf statements it will be noted that the temporary
    variables are deleted too soon.
    Is there a compiler option that I am missing?
    Thanks in advance.
    ===================================
    The g++ compiler (using Linux/Mac OS X/OpenBSD/FreeBSD) produces:
    (1) f.a = 6.000000e+00
    (2) g.a = 6.000000e+00

    The code involves copying AClass objects to create temps, and you don't have a copy constructor. The compiler-generated copy constructor copies the pointer 'a' in the class, and when one of the copies is destroyed, the data in the other copy is also destroyed.
    Add a copy constructor similar to the one below and your code should behave as you expect.
    AClass::AClass( const AClass &c ) {
        a = new double[1];
        a[0] = c.a[0];
        // printf("copy    from %p to %p\n", &c, this);
    }

  • Netware 6.5sp8 DHCP Locator Object deleted

    Hi,
    I have somehow deleted the DHCP Locator object. I have tried using
    DNIPINST, iManager and the DHCP java console to recreate the object, but
    without success.
    Any ideas on how to recover these object(s)
    Regards
    John

    Hi, I did restart DNS and DHCP and I do have a replica on the server then
    out of desperation I put the option 6 into each subnet and all is good. (for
    now). One thing I have noticed is that all the items in the "No-Forward
    List" have disappeared. I think the list is stored in e-dir or in a file
    somewhere. I don't really want to re-enter these urls. Is there a way of
    finding this info.
    Regards
    John
    >>> On 20 October 2011 at 18:17, in message
    <[email protected]>,
    Craig Johnson<[email protected]> wrote:
    > In article <[email protected]>, John Gill wrote:
    >> Any ideas where to look.
    >>
    > Have you tried restarting DNS? (Unload / reload named)
    >
    > I've seen changes to DNS or DHCP take a while to propagate through
    > eDir, such that reloading named a second time got things working.
    >
    > Have you got a replica on the server? (One holding the locator
    > object.)
    >
    > Have you tried a dsrepair, advanced options, global schema operations,
    > and had it do the post-NW5 and optional schema enhancements.
    >
    > Why not try putting option 6 into the other dhcp options for the dhcp
    > subnet(s) instead of global options?
    >
    > Craig Johnson
    > http://www.craigjconsulting.com

  • Objects deleted accidentally. Need to regain them

    Hi Folks
    I had a BAPI with 4 structures. The BAPI and all of its structures are associated with the same TR under same FG and Package..
    Accidentally, I have deleted the 4 structures using another TR. Is there a way to regain the deleted objects back to system?
    Thanks.......
    Rajvat

    Hello,
    If you are aware when you release a transport, cofiles & data files are generated. These are generally saved in a preconfigured directory in AL11 (generally it is DIR_TRANS)
    What Sandeep is trying to tell is ask the basis guy to import the cofiles & data files of the first transport which had reference to the "created" structures.
    You should check with a basis team member, he should be able help you.
    BR,
    Suhas

  • Public object delete/disable

    hi
    i want to flag public objects for deletion. In other words i just need to diable the public object record when user deletes it from the front end. Record should be available in database even though i delete the object but to be flaged as disabled. can any one suggest me if i can use any property of public object which would help me out to accomplish this problem.
    tomorrow if i retrieve the public object i would just reset the attribute and access the public object.

    How you accomplish this will depend on which protocols you want to use, and who will be given rights to "restore" the document.
    With 9.0.3 Files (not the 9.0.3 CMSDK) we have single file restore and a trash can.
    You can implement something similar -
    Serverside override on the pre-free
    Matt.

  • Vertex Array Object deleted after full screen RAM preview

    Hi,
    I'm writing a plugin where I use OpenGL VAOs. Everything works fine, also RAM preview, but when I cancel full screen RAM preview and render a new frame the VAO is somehow deleted. I called glGenVertexArrays for testing and the handle it returns is 1, which was previously the handle of my valid VAO.
    Has anyone had this problem?  It only happens when using full screen RAM preview. I also tested this in the GLator sample by generating dummy VAOs and it's exactly the same.

    Hi Rick,
    Thanks for the reply.
    I've changed the .mp3 file to a .wav file and that seemed to fix everything, for the time being...
    It previewed for 10 seconds fine, but after about 15mins of working on this the RAM preview area has started to shrink again and it's only previewing just over half (5 seconds).
    I changed my memory and allocated 4GB to other apps, also turning off rendering multiple frames... (by the way for some reason I can't get my 'actual cpu's that will be used' to change from 0? This seemed odd). Still no change.
    I've attached a screenshot of my comp details below, along with a shot of my screen when RAM previewing... (you can see the green bar does not go all the way). I'm not working with ANY footage which is why this is most peculiar, just the wav file so I can edit to the beat.
    Once again if there is anything else you can think of...

Maybe you are looking for