Only one Custom field is missed in Service Level Determination

Hi
I have extended Service Request BO with 4 field, one field is ID type and rest of field are Text type.
in Service Entitlement-> Service Level Determine-> adapt column, "Decision table configuration" under the available column I can see all the extended field( SDK & KUT), but only one extended field(ID type) is missed.
Could anyone explain how to bring that field there.
Thanks
Sunil Maurya

Hi Bharadwaj,
Thank you for your inputs. I executed the program but it didn't display the field.
But I was able to rectify it by re-creating the steps mentioned in the blog (see original post). I had missed giving correct positions to the custom field.
Regards
Kishan

Similar Messages

Fbl5n: The printer provides me only one customer items for each page...

Hi all,
launching t.code FBL5N, and printing the repost list, the printer provides me only one customer items for each page...
I'd like obtaining more customer items for each page...
What to do?
Thanks

Hi Umberto..
Thats how the standard report works..
To meet your requirement, you would probably need to look at another standard report.
In case you need further clarification, please feel free to write to me..
Good Luck!
Lucid-Mind...

When defining copy rules, only one source field allowed

Our users have requested the facility to allow them to copy pricing condition records when in in VK12 transaction. But when configuring the copy rules, we have come across the following problem:
When configuring copying rules for copying pricing condition records,
there is no possibility to use more than one source/target fields.
In our example, the condition table created for a certain pricing
access sequence contains keys such as Sales Organization, Sold-to Party
"and" Product Hierarchies level 1 to level 9 (e.g. PH1 - PH9) .
In the condition table definition, fields PH1 to PH9, although key
fields, are also defined as footer fields. This means that per sales
organization and sold-to party, we can create more than one condition
record based on different combinations of PH1 to PH9.
However when setting up copy rules for conditions in SPRO (SD -
Pricing Control - Copy Control for Conditions) to allow our users to copy the condition records, for a given Source /
Target table, the standard selection screen only allows us to define one Source / Target field.
In our case, this is not helpful. The configurator should be allowed
to select more than one source field (i.e. PH1 and PH2 and ..... PH9). At this moment,
we can only select as source field PH1 or PH2 or PH3., etc..
Steps for the Reconstruction:
- Run Spro.
- Select SD --> Pricing --> Pricing control --> Copy control for conditions -- > Copying rule for conditions
- Select 'New Entries'. Selection screen is displayed. The issue is that in this selection screen, the configurator is allowed to select only one source field. He should be allowed to select multiple fields.
Can you help us with this problem please?
Your help is much appreciated!
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:50 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:52 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:53 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:55 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:56 PM

Hi Ralph,
I don't like that methode. Importing the same transport 15 times, each time changing the source-system mapping and making sure, that source-system gets the changes seems to be a huge source of errors, which will be hard to find.
What do you think of the following idea to solve the issue a totally different way:
All transfer-rules directly connected to the source-systems are stripped of all Coding, so there is a plain 1 by 1 transformation including 0logsys.
The InfoSources attached all lead to one ODS-Object, which has the only purpose to collect the data from the source-system without any transformation. So some fields a filled by a system and other fields maybe not.
The coding specific for source-systems is moved to transfer- / update-rules from that ODS-Object to the original ODS-Objects / Cubes and the "collecting" ODS-Object is emptied after every loading process.
This will result in a single point of change. It will be quite a huge program (maybe in startroutine) but it's the one and only point, where changes and corrections have to be made.
Regards
Robert

Reference customer field is missing in FPP1

Dear Experts,
In FPP1 reference customer field is missing.
How to get the field,i checked in BUPT transactions.
Regards,
Nags

Hi,
Did you check screen configuration for contract partner?
Path: SPRO u2192 Reference IMG u2192 Cross Application Components u2192 SAP Business Partneru2192 Basic Settingsu2192 screen configuration u2192 configure screen
In this select general datau2192Rolesu2192Contract partneru2192 click on choose icon(F2)
choose Identification tab in bottom side of the window
new screen will appear, in that check ref. customer field is present or not?
Hope this may help..
Thanks,
Harshal

How to share one custom field from FITE_VC_GENERAL_DATA to FITE_VC_REVIEW

Hi FORUM
I haved created one custom field in the FITE_VC_GENERAL_DATA by one Enhancement, to get this custom field in FITE_VC_REVIEW screen, i filled a z_table_tmp, but i´m not happy with this solution and i thinked that is not the best way. How can i pass this custom value to the FITE_VC_REVIEW with a correct solution ?.. maybe by general_data context structure ?
Thnks
Josué Cruz

Josue Cruz wrote:
> Hi FORUM
>
> I haved created one custom field in the FITE_VC_GENERAL_DATA by one Enhancement, to get this custom field in FITE_VC_REVIEW screen, i filled a z_table_tmp, but i´m not happy with this solution and i thinked that is not the best way. How can i pass this custom value to the FITE_VC_REVIEW with a correct solution ?.. maybe by general_data context structure ?
>
> Thnks
> Josué Cruz
Hello Josué,
the correct approach would be to add a common Web Dynpro Component Usage Relation to both the FITE_VC_GENERAL_DATA and FITE_VC_REVIEW Component. To the common Z Web Dynpro Component you add a Interface Context which will be exposed to the FITE Components. The new field should be mapped to the new Interface Node of the Z Web Dynpro Component. As bothe FITE share now a common context, the field will be available.
regards,
Markus

Formatted Search - Restrict to Only One Customer on Activity Window

Hello Experts:
Am trying to create a formatted search to provide a suggested RMA Number on the Business Partners > Activity window in a UDF.
While in Activity, the user should get a list of ONLY the one customer they are currently working with. So if C0001 is being used in the Activity window, the list should show all suggested RMA numbers just for that customer of C0001, not any other customer.
When I use the following it shows all customers.
--FMS 6BP Automated RMA Number
SELECT
T1.[CardCode] + ' - ' + ltrim(str(T0.[ClgCode]))
FROM OCLG T0
INNER JOIN OCRD T1
ON T0.CardCode = T1.CardCode
ORDER BY
T1.CardCode Desc,
T1.[CardCode] + ' - ' + ltrim(str(T0.[ClgCode])) Desc
When I put in WHERE T1.CardCode = $[$ 9.0.0 ] in the right place it shows nothing...
Any ideas on how to make only the one current customer in Activity window appear in the list???
Thanks in Advance - Zal

Thanks Istvan and Gordon...
Istvan - that is the same as my SQL - just do not know how to show the $[$... correctly in this forum - it always goes to that http thing.
Gordon - tried to use your SQL but it gave me an error of "Internal Error (-1003) Occured [Message 131-183] every time I tried to click on the magnifying glass. However, due to your last line in the SQL it gave me an idea that eventually they were OK with - namely, the highest number to the top of T0.ClgCode...
Thanks again guys - Zal

Custom fields on confirm goods/services centrally

Hi Gurus,
I am working in classic scenario of SRM 5.0.
I have a requirement for which I need to add 2 custom fields on extended search screen of confirm goods/services centrally; I have tried implementing the note 672960 which did not helped me.
Can anybody please suggest me if you have any info.
Thanks,
Arun.

Hi Arun,
From what i understood from your query, you want to add fields on the "CONFIRM GOODS/SERVICES CENTRALLY" transaction search screen.
The fields are 'shopping cart number' and 'shopping cart creator'.
Please go through the following OSS Note:
Note 672960 - User-defined fields 2
I think the structure you should use are:
INCL_EEW_PD_SEARCH_HDR_CSF_CNF
If you have defined document-specific fields on header and/or item level, you also have to define them in structures INCL_EEW_PD_HEADER_CSF (for the fields of the header) and INCL_EEW_PD_ITEM_CSF IF THEY HAVE NOT BEEN DEFINED THERE YET. Consequently, these structures contain the combination of header or item fields of all document-specific fields
You can also use user-defined fields as search criteria. To do this, you have to set fields XINPUT and XDISPLAY to 'X' in table ET_FIELDS for the fields you want to use in BADI BBP_CUF_BADI_2 in method MODIFY_SCREEN. The fields defined this way are displayed if you choose the 'Extended search' link.
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Pradeep

Transferring data from one custom field to another

Dear SAP gurus,
I have requirement that we create custom field in Shopping Cart and PO, and when creating PO referring to the Shopping Cart the content of the custom field in SC need to be defaulted automatically in PO. For example I create SC 'A' and inputting 'X' in custom field in SC. When creating PO from SC, in the screen, the custom field in PO should be automatically populated by 'X'.
Is there any way to accomodate this in SRM?
Best regards,
John

Hello John,
Did you give different field name for the custom field in SC and PO structure.
If the field names are same then only it will automatically populate the value.
Sc custom value is getting saved in Data base table check once.
Regards,
Neelima

How to Make One custom field unique apart from Userkeys defined by Oracle?

Hi,
I have one requirement to make a a number field to be unique at Account level. I know as per Siebel on Demand Account Name & Location combination is using as UK. But as per my requirement, i want to restrict user to not entering duplicate value in a defined custom field. How can we achieve this.
All helpful suggestions are welcome..
Regards,
Subbu

No, you cant create unique custom fields... I know, it's terrible.

Allow only one IP ADDRESS from a web service call

Hi gurus,
i'm working in an ECC 6.0 with stack18 (SOAMANAGER tcode).
I have defined a new web service definition (with SE80 tcode) and i see it in SOAMANAGER tcode.
I have to limit to one ip address when 3rd party client invoke it; it's possible to do this with an authorization object or by some SOAMANAGER value filled in order to have only one ip address invoked.
Thank's in advance.
Maurizio Ortolani

Hi,
Did you resolve your problem Because We want to implement the same functionality in our SAP Landscape.
Thanks in advance.
Thanasis

Only one custom ringtone at a time?

I've uploaded more than one custom ringtone at a time onto my phone, but it shows two of the same song and won't upload anymore. Anyone with a suggestion?

Wordartist65
When you connect the iphone up to itunes, click on the iphone on the left side.
To the left of the name of the iphone on the left hand side of itunes, there is a triangle.
Click on that triangle and it will expand a menu down or up.
Click on the ringtones under the iphone and see if the ringtones show up as duplicate or different.
If the ringtones are different, then there is corrupted on the iphone that is not allowing it to read the ringtones correctly.
To fix this you will need to restore the iphone.
After the iphone has been restored an option will come up to restore from back up.
Do not restore from back up, set up as a new iphone.
The reason for this is if there was anything corrupted on the iphone that was not allowing the iphone to read the ringtones correctly, you do not want to put it back on the iphone.
here is an article from the apple support website that might help in the restore process.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305744
Hope this helps.

Add custom fields in ML81n line item level

Hi All,
We have a requirement to add custom field in ML81N. I have found an enhancement SRVDET and table CI_ESLLDB to add the custom field. But my problem is, I cant find the screen where can I add that custom field. Does anybody knows this?
Appreciate your inputs.
Thanks in advance.

Dear,
Below mentioned enhancment will create a new tab strip in the detail screen of service entry
SRVDET              User screen on tab strip of service detail screen
Create one project in CMOD, then assign the enhancement
Calling screen No. Area     Called screen   No. Short Text
SAPLMLSP        0220 SUSCUSER SAPLXMLU        0299
New field should be added in the include structure CI_ESLLDB
Desgin these new fields in screen 0299 of program SAPLXMLU.
Put your code in FM
EXIT_SAPLMLSP_040              Transfer of Data to Detail User Screen
EXIT_SAPLMLSP_041              Adoption of Data from User Screen
Regards
Dillip

Deleting AET custom field from the SAP tableu2019s level.

Hi experts,
I am deleting few un-used custom fields in AET. I am able to see delete symbol as status in AET. Although deleted custom fields are present in lot of structure and tables (eg: CRMD_ORDERADM_H) in SAP GUI tables. I want to delete the custom field from SAP GUI tables and structures.
I tried to delete custom field from the SAP GUI tableu2019s level. But it is not allowing.
Please get me some clue on deleting custom field from the SAP GUI tableu2019s level.
Thanks in advance
Chand

Hi,
The deletion of custom field in AET happens in two steps:
1. You select a custom field that you want to delete, than you press on the delete icon in the Custom Field Assignment Block.
Doing this, you mark the selected custom field to be deleted.
2. You press on "Save and Generate" button. The "Save" will persist the deletion mark of the custom field. It means the custom field is marked to be deleted in the database. The "Generate" will process all the deletion of objects which are needed to delete the custom field, for example: Domain, Data Element, Append, etc.
If the "Generate" does not happen due any reason, the deletion mark is already persisted in DB. It means, later on if you go back to AET, you will see that the custom field is marked to be deleted, but it is not yet deleted.
If you do not press "Save and Generate" button at all, it means, you do not persist the deletion mark in DB. Later on if you go back to AET, you won't see that the custom field marked to be deleted.
Note: Please make sure, "Generation" is only applied for field that is flagged to be generated. The "Generate" flag column is by default hidden. You can use personlization to show the column.
Regards,
Steve

Custom field in VA01 at item level in Additional Data B Tab

Hi ,
I have a requirement to add a custom field at item level in Additional Data B tab of VA01/VA02. We have to store the data in that field in the VBAP table also have to validate the data entered in the field when user hit save.
Can any body tell me step by step procedure to do that.
Appreciate your response.
Thanks,
Rohit

Add append structure ZAVBAP in table VBAP in Tcode: SE11.
In this structure include the new fields to be added to the screen.
Then in Tcode : SE80
take program: SAPMV45A
take screen 8459 and add the new field.
Also add the validation in the flow logic.

ALV output to excel - custom fields are missing

Hi,
I am displaying the output using ALV grid display. I have few fields in the output table that I am calculating based on the rest. When i save this output file to an Excel file I am getting all the fields except the ones that I am calculating. something like
vbeln | posnr | kwmeng | custom field1 | werks
1 0010 10 alb1
I am getting the werks field value in the custom field1. and custom field1 value is missing.
Please suggest me some solutions.
Thanks.

Hi,
Check the format in which you export to Excel (MHTML, XML, ...) and try antoher one.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/66/79ad48157f11d2953700a0c930328a/content.htm
I think the integrated Excel mode shows '@08@'.
Best regards,
Guillaume

Only one Custom field is missed in Service Level Determination

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for