When defining copy rules, only one source field allowed

Our users have requested the facility to allow them to copy pricing condition records when in in VK12 transaction. But when configuring the copy rules, we have come across the following problem:
When configuring copying rules for copying pricing condition records,
there is no possibility to use more than one source/target fields.
In our example, the condition table created for a certain pricing
access sequence contains keys such as Sales Organization, Sold-to Party
"and" Product Hierarchies level 1 to level 9 (e.g. PH1 - PH9) .
In the condition table definition, fields PH1 to PH9, although key
fields, are also defined as footer fields. This means that per sales
organization and sold-to party, we can create more than one condition
record based on different combinations of PH1 to PH9.
However when setting up copy rules for conditions in SPRO (SD -
Pricing Control - Copy Control for Conditions) to allow our users to copy the condition records, for a given Source /
Target table, the standard selection screen only allows us to define one Source / Target field.
In our case, this is not helpful. The configurator should be allowed
to select more than one source field (i.e. PH1 and PH2 and ..... PH9). At this moment,
we can only select as source field PH1 or PH2 or PH3., etc..
Steps for the Reconstruction:
- Run Spro.
- Select SD --> Pricing --> Pricing control --> Copy control for conditions -- > Copying rule for conditions
- Select 'New Entries'. Selection screen is displayed. The issue is that in this selection screen, the configurator is allowed to select only one source field. He should be allowed to select multiple fields.
Can you help us with this problem please?
Your help is much appreciated!
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:50 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:52 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:53 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:55 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:56 PM

Hi Ralph,
I don't like that methode. Importing the same transport 15 times, each time changing the source-system mapping and making sure, that source-system gets the changes seems to be a huge source of errors, which will be hard to find.
What do you think of the following idea to solve the issue a totally different way:
All transfer-rules directly connected to the source-systems are stripped of all Coding, so there is a plain 1 by 1 transformation including 0logsys.
The InfoSources attached all lead to one ODS-Object, which has the only purpose to collect the data from the source-system without any transformation. So some fields a filled by a system and other fields maybe not.
The coding specific for source-systems is moved to transfer- / update-rules from that ODS-Object to the original ODS-Objects / Cubes and the "collecting" ODS-Object is emptied after every loading process.
This will result in a single point of change. It will be quite a huge program (maybe in startroutine) but it's the one and only point, where changes and corrections have to be made.
Regards
Robert

Similar Messages

Create a business model when we have only one source table

Hi,
How to create a business model when we have only one source table in Physical layer
Regards
Swathi

This is very much possible and feasible. Its called as Single Table model. Good example is SA System Subject Area where we just have a single physical source. No need to create Alias in Physical. Simply use the same table twice in BMM with one Logical Table as Dummy Fact..Like say Count of Users (aggregated). Then apply normal Complex join in BMM and present in presentation layer.
http://gerardnico.com/wiki/dat/obiee/single_table_model
http://gerardnico.com/wiki/dat/obiee/sasystem

The kerberos PAC verification failure when all users of only one RODC Site, trying to get access iis webpage of different site using Integrated Windows Authentication

The kerberos PAC verification failure when all users of only one Site which having only one RODC server(A), trying to get access iis webpage of different site which having WDC server(B) using Integrated Windows Authentication. But when they accessing the
website using IP address, it is not asking for credentials as I think it is using NTLM Authentication at that time which is less secure than Kerberos.
Note that:- All user accounts and Computers of the RODC has been allowed cache password on the RODC. Nearest WDC for the RODC (A) is the WDC (B).
The website is hosted on a windows server 2003 R2 and generating below system event log for those users of the RODC site :-
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Kerberos
Event Category: None
Event ID: 7
Date:
<var style="color:#333333;font-family:'Segoe UI', Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:normal;">date</var>
Time:
<var style="color:#333333;font-family:'Segoe UI', Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:normal;">time</var>
User: N/A
Computer:
<var style="color:#333333;font-family:'Segoe UI', Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:normal;">computer_name (the 2003 server)</var>
Description: The kerberos subsystem encountered a PAC verification failure. This indicates that the PAC from the client<var style="color:#333333;font-family:'Segoe
UI', Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:normal;">computer_name</var> in realm <var
style="color:#333333;font-family:'Segoe UI', Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:normal;">realm_name</var> had
a PAC which failed to verify or was modified. Contact your system administrator.
This issue has been raised for last one week. Before that everything was fine. No Group Policy changed, Time also same.
In this situation do I need to do Demotion of the RODC and re-promote it as RODC again or is there any other troubleshooting to resolve it.
Thanks in Advanced
Souvik

Hi Amy,
Thanks for your response
I noticed that Logon server could become incorrect again after user re-login or restart of a workstation.
It seems root cause is different. Need a permanent solution.
The Workstations of the RODC site are getting IP from a DHCP server by automatic distribution of IP from a specific subnet for the site only. The RODC is
the Primary DNS server for the site.
I have checked the subnet and it is properly bound with only with that AD site. The group of users and workstations are in the same site AD organisational Unit.
Sometime I restarted the NET LOGON service and DNS server service on ther RODC server and sometime rebooted the server. But the Logon server issue has not fixed permanently.
The internal network bandwidth of the site is better than the bandwidth to communicate with other site.
The server is Windows server 2008 R2 standard and hosting the below roles
RODC
DNS
File server
The server performance is Healthy in core times when maximum users usually logins.
Any further support would be much appreciated Amy
Thanks
Souvik

Create "result line" when defining scrambling rule

When defining scrambling rules, there is a button called "create result line".
I am not sure how to use this feature.
Could somebody give some hints?
Thanks a lot!

Suman:
Here are the steps to reproduce:
- at activity "scrambling data"
- try to create a field-set
- you are now at the screen with "Field-Sets" as the title on the screen top.
- change to "modify" mode by clicking the "pen" at the lower portion of the screen.
- put the mouse on the button which is next to the "trash bin", you can see a little popup "create result-line"
Could you help explain how to use this feature?
Thanks!

Only one Custom field is missed in Service Level Determination

Hi
I have extended Service Request BO with 4 field, one field is ID type and rest of field are Text type.
in Service Entitlement-> Service Level Determine-> adapt column, "Decision table configuration" under the available column I can see all the extended field( SDK & KUT), but only one extended field(ID type) is missed.
Could anyone explain how to bring that field there.
Thanks
Sunil Maurya

Hi Bharadwaj,
Thank you for your inputs. I executed the program but it didn't display the field.
But I was able to rectify it by re-creating the steps mentioned in the blog (see original post). I had missed giving correct positions to the custom field.
Regards
Kishan

I'm iphone 4 and when i play music only one speaker plays it loud but the other one is too low.

I'm iphone 4 and when i play music only one speaker plays it loud but the other one is too low.

If you are referring to the speaker(s) along the bottom edge, there is one speaker, one microphone.

Indesign repeatedly crashes when I copy text from one InDesign document to another InDesign document

Indesign CC repeatedly crashes when I copy text from one InDesign document to another InDesign document. Is it possible to solve this problem?

Without system information and details like what text formatting, language settings, fonts used, paragraph styles even down to the spell check language nobody can even begin to guess.
Mylenium

What is the importance of Only One Business Partner Allowed

Hi all,
We know that the Relation between BP and Contract account is :
1 BP : n CA.
If the above relation is true, I would like to know the importance of the configuration "Only One Business Partner Allowed" in the below path:
Financial Accounting(New) >>Contract Acounts and Recievables>>Basic Functions >>Contract Accounts >>Field Modifications>>Configure Field Attributes for Contract Account Category.
If we don't check the field for "Only One Business Partner Allowed" , Does it contradict to the 1BP : n CA relation ?
Regards,
Sai
Edited by: kantesai on Aug 10, 2011 10:35 PM

n BP : n CA relation is possible.
One BP must be account holder from all BPs of CA. Rest of BPs can be Alternate Account, Spouse etc.
Please check table FKKVKP from technical perspective, as both BP and CA are primary key. If it was 1 BP : n CA then there would have only VKONT been as primary key.
Thanks,
Murtuza

Copy Transferrules from one source system to another

Hi everybody,
we're uploading data from nearly 25 sourcesystems (including separate systems and systems with more than one client to extract from) via flat-file. The source-system exports data to a shared file directory and the bw-system reads it from there. Though this results in only <b>one</b> transferrule for all source-systems, it keeps generating problems every time upload is due.
Somebody had the idea to switch to 'standard' R/3->BW method of data staging, using generic extractors and so on. But this will result in <b>25</b> transferrules which, I'm afraid, have to be set up and maintained seperately. As there's quite some coding in the rules (the transfertructure in fact has 241 fields), flaws are for sure!
We know the trick of exporting a transferrule, changing the source-system-mapping and re-importing the same transport-request. That can be used to copy to one or two other systems, but not for 25.
Does anybody know another way to copy a transferrule from one source system to multiple other source systems?
Looking forward to your answers
Thanks and Regards
Robert

Hi Ralph,
I don't like that methode. Importing the same transport 15 times, each time changing the source-system mapping and making sure, that source-system gets the changes seems to be a huge source of errors, which will be hard to find.
What do you think of the following idea to solve the issue a totally different way:
All transfer-rules directly connected to the source-systems are stripped of all Coding, so there is a plain 1 by 1 transformation including 0logsys.
The InfoSources attached all lead to one ODS-Object, which has the only purpose to collect the data from the source-system without any transformation. So some fields a filled by a system and other fields maybe not.
The coding specific for source-systems is moved to transfer- / update-rules from that ODS-Object to the original ODS-Objects / Cubes and the "collecting" ODS-Object is emptied after every loading process.
This will result in a single point of change. It will be quite a huge program (maybe in startroutine) but it's the one and only point, where changes and corrections have to be made.
Regards
Robert

Report error when using combo box and one text field is empty

I'm building an interactive pdf in adobe pro 9. My problem is the following: I have one text field where you can enter a numeric code and that is used to populate another text field when I choose an option on one combo box.For example: suppose I write the code 123 in the text field "A" and that the combo box has two options ("data" and "-"). When I select "-", another text field "B" is empty, while when I select "data" i populate the text field "B" using the code entered "A" with the text "data_123". In order to do this I use the standard javascript code in the Format>Custom tab of the combo-box.
My questions are:
- how can I prevent the pdf to proceed selecting an option in the combo box when the field "A" is empty?
- how can I update the field "B" every time that I change the text in "A"? I found that the text is "B" is updated only when I press the selection in the combo box.

You can set the combo box to read-only in the Validate event of the A field:
// Validate script for text field
getField("combo1").readonly = !event.value;
To update the value of B when A changes, you can expand the script above to something like:
// Validate script for text field
var f1 = getField("combo1");
var f2 = getField("B");
// If there is an entry in the A field...
if (event.value) {
    f1.readonly = false; // Make sure the combo box is activated
    f2.value = f1.value === "-" ? "" : "fa.value + event.value; // Update the value of field B
} else {
    f1.readonly = true; // Deactivate the combo box
    f2.value = f2.defaultValue; // Reset field B
You might also want to reset the combo box somewhere in there, but it's not clear to me when you would want to do that.

JDev hangs when creating copy rule

Hi,
I try to build a simple BPEL prototyp using beta3. Sometimes, when I create a copy rule, jdev just hangs and I have to kill it via task manager (win xp). I suppose this only happens with quite "long" variable names in the expression builder?
Has anyone experienced these hangs?

Hi,
I started trying Beta3 only. Didn't check in Eclipse by now.
My configuration is: win xp SP2 (up tp date), 1GB RAM, BPEL beta3.
I tried to create a copy rule for a variable named: ReadDBParams_ReadParamsServiceSelect_OutputVariable
This freezes jdev all the time. Then I renamed the variable to: ReadDBParams_OUT
This seems to work.
The long variable name doesn't make that much sense, but it was generated by a witard like that, so it should work... :-)

How do I sync the "view size" when I copy clips from one sequence to another in FCE4?

My idea was to edit an advanced clip in a separate sequence (bad idea) and then copy it into the main sequence, but I ran into an obstacle.
For a clip to fit the window in Sequence 1 it is shown at 44%, while in sequence 2 it is enough with 22%. Problem is, when I copy a clip from sequence 2 to 1, it appears twice the size. How can I adjust this? The clip from sequence 2 becomes disproportionately big on the screen when copied to sequence 1.
Thank you for taking your time.

As Studio X pointed out, you open a huge can of worms when you work with sequences of different specifications, but try this -
once the clip has been pasted into the sequence, click on it on the timeline so that it is selected. Now Control-click on that clip, and from the drop down menu, choose Remove Attributes.
When the remove attributes pane opens, check the box for Basic Motion and Distort (if they are not grayed out) and click OK. This should reset the clip size.
If this is successful, you can do this to multiple clips all at once by selecting them, then clicking on any one of the selected clips and doing the above.
MtD

Issue with Selection Listener when the table has only one row

Hi All ,
I have developed a table in which I am using Selection Listener to perform some task when any row is selected.
It is working fine when I have more than 1 row in the table, but when I have only one row in the table , the selection listener do not call the corresponding method in bean.
I understand that selection event will be raised only when the row is changed, but in the use case when only one row is there, what should be done to make the selection listener work ?
In the selection listener I have written code to make the selected row as current row , and perform the required task.
Please suggest a way out for this situation.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
try removing this attr from table
selectedRowKeys="#{bindings.xxx_VO1.collectionModel.selectedRow}"

When I open events only one pic shows?

My 1 year banged on my keyboard and now only one photo shows, I cannot view all photos in a particular event at one time anymore. Any thoughts?

the first time is always the hardest
Next time you will find it quickly
LN
Message was edited by: LarryHN

Auto Import - Is only ONE watch folder allowed across several catalogs?

I am looking to confrim that Lightroom v4.4 only allows for one watch folder to be set up under File>Auto Import and therefore I cannot set up a differnet watch folder for each of my multiple catalogs.
I represent several artists and need to manage their image database separately and thought I would be able to auto import from a folder they drop images to; But now I realize Lightroom may only allow one watch folder overall because when I open a catalog I notice the watch folder is set to what I selected when the previous catalog was being used.
Is their a way to have each catalog watching a folder unique to it or is only one watch folder possible?
Thanks in advance for the answer and any solutions.

Yes - watched folder is handled as Lightroom preference, not catalog preference...
For greater flexibility you'll need a plugin. Consider:
* jf Folder Watch
* rc Ottomanic Importer
Rob

When defining copy rules, only one source field allowed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for