Only one vendor

hi,
for particular material only have one vendor, how can i default this vendor fot that material, possilbe to use vendor infor record?

not sure if i understood your question.
maybe using regular vendor indicator will help you.
on inforecord there is checkbox to define Regular vendor (field EINA-RELIF)
or maybe you meant that certain group of materials has always the same vendor?
in this case group all those materials in one material category. in this category there should not be any material not included in one vendor group of articles. define default vendor in reference article. and assign that reference article to material category (tr.WG22)
Regards,
Sara

Similar Messages

Output type neu not coming only one vendor

Hi
I have maintained for my condition record in nace t.code for purchase order key combinatinon for document type ZCPO
so when ever i creating po in me21n t.code using doc type ZCPO my outputype neu coming automaticaly,only one vendor
code for my doc type ZCPO,neu not coming automaticaly,plz suggest,
Regards
Sam
Edited by: sadaraji on May 1, 2011 12:22 PM

Hi Sam,
In MN05 there are different key kombinations. Maybe you have a key combination containg a vendor number before the one without the vendor number (only doc. type). I think this is also the access sequence of NEU in standard.
In such case, there might be a record for this specific vendor pointing to another printer or no printer at all - and this record screens the output record that you defined for the document type without vendor.
BR
Raf

One vendor per document in F-02

Hi All.
I want to limit the number of vendors possible in document posting through F-02.
Only one vendor should be allowed on documents with document type 'KR'.
I have been trying to place a validation OB28 but I am having problems.
I have created a prequisite of :
BKPF-BUKRS = '1200' AND BKPF-BLART = 'KR' AND BSEG-BSCHL = '31'
Now how do I check whether two different vendors are present in the line items of the document? Is there a way to save the first occurance of a vendor in a constant and use another step to check the remaining line items?
Please help. Will reward points.
Thank you.
Zeeshan Shah

Thanks Andreas. I have awarded points. That resolved part of the problem but a new scenario has been raised.
We have two companies on the same server and are using the same KR document type, which why we are looking for an alternate solution >and this does not include creating another document type.
Therefore, either using the validation or using an user exit is an option. How to go about the validation process or know an exit which triggers at saving the document?
Help greatly appreciated.

Logististics issue--one vendor code is supplier & provides services too.

Hi all-
We are LSP company & have recently implement ECC6.0--an issue has cropped up.
how can i maintain only one vendor code( his address details,income tax number,service tax number are the same) who provides services and is also my supplier--what account group ,GL,reco AND what partner functions are to be assigned?
pl send me solution(s) so that I can test and productionise....
<< Moderator message -The answers in the forum are provided by volunteers. Please do not ask for help "promptly". >>.
warm regards--
A.VENKAT KRISHNAN
HEAD (I.T./SAP)
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Nov 7, 2011 11:40 AM

Hi Alex,
Have you checked Industry key (LFA1-BRSCH) in Vendor master data control tab.
I hope you can use this field as same for your requirement.
Best Regards,
Kishore

Trouble opening .dmg file from one vendor

Occasionally I receive an update to software I own in the form of a .dmg file.
I typically double click the attachment in the email, and save it to the desktop.
Then I go to the desktop and double click that file to open it and get the updates, documentation etc. that was enclosed. From one particular respected vendor, I have been getting updates that way for years. However for the last three or so updates, when I try to open the .dmg file, I just get a -4960 error instead. (They then have emailed me another link so I can get the update via another means.)
I tried opening the image with Disk Utility also and get the same error. But going to Disk Utilities Help and searching on "-4960" gives some story about missing RAID component or something, which I think is bogus.
Any clues why a .dmg from just this one vendor is causing me grief?

I just did a Google search on "error -4960" and got 508,000 hits. Error -4960 is a Core Foundation Unknown Error. In other words it is a catch all for a problem that was detected in the core foundation and whatever the problem is the system had no way of identifying the error more explicitly.
The log file entries might help narrow down where the error is occuring. But with or without them one can only guess what the cause is. If this were happening with more than one vendor, I would suggest removing any download managers such as SpeedDownload or iGetter. Since this is occurring with the files of only one vendor, the problem has to be on their end and there are many possibilities. The fact they can come up an alternate and successful link would lead me to believe you are not the only one encountering this situation. It sounds like a situation that will have to be corrected by the "reputable vendor".

One Vendor Code - Multiple Addresses

Hi Experts ,
We have One Vendor But he has two different Plants and we need to create PO with Ref. to Both the Plants. Do we need to create Two Separate Vendor codes in SAP with Different Addresses or we can utilize same Vendor Code for both Addresses.
SAP Version we are Using : SAP R/3 ECC 6.0
Kindly Guide.
Regards
Honey

it is possible to assign only one vendor to a supplying plant. If you have multiple supplying plants then you can
create multiple vendors and assign each of them to a plant. You do not need to reorganize your purchasing organization for this. Once you make the plant assignment to the vendor you can then use this vendor for raising the stock transport order for this plant. Treat this vendor similar to any other vendor for the receiving plant.
Plants that are involved in company-internal business transactions can be described in terms of a business partner (such as a vendor or customer). Such a company-internal transaction might involve a stock transport order followed by a delivery and possibly an invoice, for example. What is important to bear in mind is that the business partner
you assign to the plant for this purpose is a theoretical business partner which describes the plant and not an actual external business partner with which your company has business relations.

Group vendors and pay to only one instead of many

Hi,
Our situation is that, we are having about 8 plants for our intercompany VE01 & each plant is a vendor for the receiving company code AR01. Now the sending company code VE01 would like to receive payments only to one vendor account not to all 8 vendors.
Can somebody help me in getting this done?
Thanks & Regards,
Raghava

Hi Raghava,
I presume that the company code VE01 would like to receive payments from its multiple intercompanies as one from one intercompany.
In this case, create all intercompanies as vendor and use the functionality of "Alternative Payee". Means, create one Main Vendor and assign this main vendor account code in all the other inter company vendor master in Alternative Payee field (FK02>company code view > payment transactions accounting).
What ever entry you post to the intercompany vendors accounts, it will have an impact in Main Vendor account and you can see the intercompany account details in Branch coloumn in FBL3N display. (Change layout)
Hope it clears your doubt.
Regards,
A.Saravanan.

One Vendor and two Reconciliation Accounts?

Hi All,
I have to post the invoices sent by a certain Vendor into two Reconciliation Accounts, according to the type of purchase (the Vendor makes two types of activity).
Unfortunately, in the master data of the vendor (company data) I can fill in only one Reconciliation Account ...
Could anyone suggest me a solution?
Thanks
Gandalf

Hi,
As mentioned in the mails below, to achieve this you have to define alternative accounts wherin you mention that against a particular econ account mentioned in your Vendor master what all Recon account are allowed.
Secondly, in your Vendor master data also you have to tick the Recon Account ready for input tick. This will ask for a recon account whenever you enter entry in that vendor account.
Thirdly for control purposes you can either write a validation for the recon account that you are entering in the Vendor master data that no postings can be made in this recon account. By this system will always ask you for an alternate account and that will help you.
Regards,
SAPFICO

Reversing Landed Cost document with more than one vendor

Hi Experts,
Reversing Landed Cost document with more than one vendor:
My client can reverse a landed cost document with One Vendor, but cannot with multiple vendors. I have also tested this in 8.8 PL10. Here is a brief description:
Created Landed cost by selecting 2 vendors in the Vendor field.
After you picked one vendor, you go to the vendor code/name again then choose another vendor you
need, once you picked, the system will ask you whether you want to delete the previous data, then
you say no, after then you will see the vendor name became "different vendors" and code be "********"
(on the vendor tab: you will see two vendors)
To Reverse Landed Cost we do the following with Landed Cost documents that only have one vendor:
I can copy from the Landed Cost document (on the right-bottom corner) while creating new one with
zero amount to reverse, which is ok; but for multiple vendors, the list of vendors onlyshows one of
the vendors for Good Receipts & Landed Cost.
Cannot copy from a Landed Cost document wioth more than one vendor to reverse this Landed Cost.
To be albe to copy from a previously created Landed Cost document (with multiple vendors) as you
can with one vendor to reverse the transaction.
Can this functionality be added to future versions?

Take a look at business area and groupings in they payment program settings...
I am not sure what version you are on but the following link for 4.7 should provide some valuable information...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/01/a9be64455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/01/a9be64455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Grouping Open Items and Individual Payments
Wherever possible, the payment program will always group items together for payment.
The payment program can only group together open items for payment if the open items in an account have the same:
1. Currency
2. Payment method in the item
3. Bank in the item
4. Contents of the grouping fields (if a grouping key is specified in the customer or vendor master record)
You can also pay open items from different company codes together, as well as customer and vendor line items.
Items in an account are not grouped together if you:
1. Make payments separately per business area. This procedure entails separate payments being created per business area.
2. Want to make individual payments
Items in which a payment method is specified are not grouped with items in which no payment method is specified.
You define the required grouping key in the IMG for Financial Accounting under Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Business Transactions -> Outgoing Payments -> Automatic Outgoing Payments -> Payment Method/Bank Selection for Payment Program -> Define Payment Groupings.
In our system, if the business area is the same, there will be one ZP document with one line with a posting key of 25. Otherwise there will be many individual 25 posting key lines with.

Output not getting proposed from a Purchase Order just for One vendor

Hi All,
We have an issue where in we have maintained a condition record with the access as "Purchase Doc type (NB) and Purchase Organization(XXXX):" pointing towards a "LS" partner function (ALE) and "4"
We have also maintained Partner configuration correctly. The issue which happens only in Production and not in TEst systems which is " only for ONE VENDOR the output is not getting proposed and for the other vendors it is getting proposed correctly. We also have a requirement attached to the Output and we do not have any vendor specific logic.
We also checked /Compared both the test and production system on Output Configuration as well as master data for VEndor and Info records and they seem to be ok.
Does any one faced a similar situation why an Output would not propose just for one specific vendor?
Would appreciate if any one can reply asap.
Thanks,

Then check with the requirement you are using bd64 is distribution model.
Check with ur output type, requirement and output determination. ale service comes only in picture partner profile with outbound parameters.
have u done the correct entries under message control in outbound parameters.
thanks
Aman

Is third-party SO/PO process possible using only one company code?

Hi friend,
1) my client wants to implement third-party PO process but also wants a way of keeping track of inventory during this process. I know that inventory should be tracked on the vendor side and not on our client side since we're doing third-party PO.
However my client wants to track inventory (in an inventory g/l account like 120100) so that when my client post a Goods Receipt, the inventory account
gets Debited and when client post the outgoing invoice to customer, the inventory account gets Credited. In this way, my client can track
if the customer have received the ordered item or not.
The problem is that third-party PO posts to consumption account but DOES NOT post to inventory account. Is there any way of
setting this up so that in addition to posting to comsumption account every time a Goods Receipt occurs?
2) i tried to create "Individual Purchase Order" (customer order from client -> client order from
vendor -> vendor ships item to client -> client then ships item to customer) so that posting will hit inventory account.
However, i find that taking this approach involves setting up a Plant for vendor (A), a Plant for our Client (B), and a Plant for Customer (C).
Because when i do a Goods Receipt, the stock has move from Plant A to Plant B. Then when i do a Goods Issue to the customer, it asks for the receiving plant. I assume this means that the stock moves from Plant B to Plant C.
Also, from the reading i did on the forum, i get the impression that i need to create more than one Company Code if i were to do
third-party PO. Do the Vendors have to be created in a different company code then the Customer? Or does it mean that Just the
plant (like Plant A) needs to be created in a different Company Code then Plant B and Plant C?
3) can i do third-party PO using only ONE company code?
Can anyone provide some clarification on this issue? I've read tons of posting but none really helped clear this issue up.
Thanks so much.

Dear Kishore,
Individual PO processing is not third party process at all. In third party process the vendor delivers the goods dirctly to the customer - please check what SAP help says.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/dd/5601d4545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm
Dear Queyen,
One important point of third party process is that there's no need to keep stock of materials - that is in harmony with reality. Why does your customer want to keep stock from the goods if they doesn't receive at all? Is it coreect? It doesn't correspond to the fact.
You can do statistical (ghost) GR against the third-party PO and you can see the goods movement in MB51 - I think this should be enough.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/dd/560287545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
BR
Csaba

1099 amounts not being combined when more than one vendor same TIN

I have multiple vendors within the same company code with the same tax id number. When the 1099's are generated, the amounts for both vendore are not getting combined. So if for one of the vendors, he has been paid $4850.00 on one vendor number, and on his other vendor number, he has been paid $500. His 1099 should be $5350.00, but it is being generated for only $4850.00.
This is only one example of this problem. Does anyone have any idea what could be causing this? Everything I have read says the 1099's should combine based on tax id number.But this is not happening.
Thanks
Alicia

Sorry to keep dwelling on this subject. I was able to accumlate the totals for 8 vendors with the same tax id sucessfully. However, all of the payment amounts exceeded the mininum for the 1099 tax type royalty.
I have not been able to take two vendors, one with let's say 6453.02 in payments, and another with the same tax id number, who only has a payment of $500.00. The $500 is below the misc limit. The 1099 form and file only show 6453.02, however the report does show the two amounts. These vendors are in different company codes.
In the define withholding tax codes, I have set the accumulation type to be combined accumulation. Still the two amounts are not beng added together on the form. Using the help for the field "combined accumulation", there is a statement "these vendors may belong to different company codes if these company codes are assigned to one tax on sales/purchases group".
Can someone tell me where I would assign this? My company is not currently using either sales or purchasing.
Thanks
Alicia

Standard program to transfer open items from one vendor to another

Hello to you all,
Does anyone know of a standard program to transfer open items from one vendor to another,
Thanks
Yoav

Hi,
i dont know whether there is any program but there is one t.code which is meant for one of this purpose.
We can do the same through F-51 also. First specify the document header information. for the first line item specify the customer debit or credit posting key, vendor number, and special gl if you want (Here you have to give vendor number to whom you want to transfer) press enter
in this screen specify the amount. and go to Choose open items new screen will come
Specify the vendor number and in additional selections choose document number and then click enter. the one line item only appear here then go for simulate. if required specify the narration by double clicking on the line item.
hope this is clear,
Regards,
Sankar

Mapping all one vendor Payments to that Vendor in DME file.... ???

Hi Gurus
I am not able to Map all one vendor Payments to that Vendor in DME file. The DME file takes each individual line item (invoice) but incorrectly with the total amount of vendor payment - not amount of each invoice. We want to pay a total for each supplier and not per individual invoice.
Please let me know.. How to set up these settings in payment method ?
Thanks
Meenakshi.N

Hi,
You can influence if open positions to one vendor are paid together or separately are controlled by this:
- FD02: vendor master
box: Individual pmnt -> please read F1-Help
box: Grouping key that can be entered in the document -> F1-Help
- FBZP: Payment method / comp code
Single payment for marked item: marked?
- FBZP: All Company Codes
Separate payment per business area: marked?
Beside that please read note 305414. Please be aware that positions can be only regulated together if there is no difference in the entries of the important fields that are contained in the structure ZHLG1.
Hope that helps to understand to logic how the payment run groups the positions for posting.
Best regards,
Jeno

Only one line is getting printed in Table in Smartforms (ECC 6.0)

Hello Sir,
I am new in ABAP and doing Smartforms (ECC 6.0) on project from customer side.
I have to deliver the object in time and it is already late, please help me.
This is my question:
Object : Stock Transport Order.
=======================
I have created Table in main window after Program Line Node.
>Main Window
>>Code2
>>Table1
>>>Header
>>>>Row1
>>>>>Cell1 to Cell10
>>>Main Area
>>>>Row2
>>>>>Cell1 to Cell10
>>>Footer
>>>>Row3
>>>>>Cell1 to Cell10
I have mentioned internal tabel as well work area table in "DATA" tab in table Node.
In Row1 I have created Text Node in every cell having Column Heading.
In Row2 I have created Text Node in every cell having variable.
In Row3 all cells are blank.
On output only one line is getting printed
What could be the reason.
=====================================================================
This is Code1 (is in the beginning of the form in window1)
==========
*& Selection of Purchasing Document No,Plant,Short Text,Quantity,Material No,
*& Gross order value in PO currency
select single ebeln werks txz01 menge matnr brtwr
from ekpo into
(v_ebeln,v_werks,v_txz01,v_menge,v_matnr,v_brtwr)
where ebeln = DOCNO.
*& Selection of Plant address
select single adrnr from t001w into v_adrnr
where werks = v_werks.
*& For Selection of phone,fax
select single name1 tel_number fax_number from adrc into (v_name1,phone,fax)
where addrnumber = v_adrnr.
*& For E-Mail Selection
select single SMTP_ADDR from adr6 into mail where addrnumber = v_adrnr.
*& For CST No.,GST No.
select single J_1ICSTNO J_1ILSTNO
              from J_1IMOCOMP into (CST,GST)
              where werks = v_werks.
*& Selection of Vendor Address No., PO date
select single reswk aedat from ekko into (v_reswk,v_aedat) where
ebeln = v_ebeln.
*& Selection of Supplying (Issuing) Plant address
select single adrnr from t001w into vendor
where werks = v_reswk.
*& Selection of storage location
select single lgort from ekpo into v_lgort where werks = v_werks
and ebeln = v_ebeln.
*& Selection of description of storage location
select single lgobe from t001l into v_lgobe where werks = v_werks.
*& Fetching data into internal table from ekpo
select ebeln ebelp matnr txz01 menge brtwr from ekpo into corresponding fields
of table iekpo where ebeln = v_ebeln and werks = v_werks.
Fetching data into internal table from marm for Pck
select * from marm into corresponding fields of table imarm for all entries
in iekpo where matnr = iekpo-matnr.
Fetching data into internal table from mara for Pack Type Code
select * from mara into corresponding fields of table imara for all entries
in iekpo where matnr = iekpo-matnr.
Fetching data into internal table from tvegrt for Pack Type Description
select * from tvegrt into corresponding fields of table itvegrt
for all entries in imara where magrv = imara-magrv.
Fetching data into internal table from eket for Receipt Date
select * from eket into corresponding fields of table ieket
where ebeln = v_ebeln.
Selection of Order Type from mepo_topline
*select single bsart from mepo_topline into v_bsart where ebeln = v_ebeln
*and superfield = v_werks.
*if v_bsart = 'UB'.
xhead = 'Replenishment Order'.
*eleseif v_bsart = 'ZSTO'.
xhead = 'Purchase Order'.
*endif.
*& Defining of variable for Printing Line Serial Number,Total Quantity,
*& Total Value
=====================================================================
This is Code2 (is in the main window)
==========
xln = 0.
tmenge = 0.
tvalue = 0.
Loop for printing table
loop at iekpo into wekpo.
xln = xln + 1.
xmatnr = wekpo-matnr.      " Material Number (Code)
xtxz01 = wekpo-txz01.      " Material Name
xmenge = wekpo-menge.      " Line Quantiy
xbrtwr = wekpo-brtwr.      " Basic Rate
*& Pck
read table imarm into wmarm with key matnr = wekpo-matnr.
xpck = wmarm-umren.        " Packing Size
*& Num
xnum = xmenge / xpck.      " Numbers of Packing
*& Line Value
xvalue = xmenge * xbrtwr. " Line Basic Value
*& Packing Type
read table imara into wmara with key matnr = wekpo-matnr.
xpacktype = wmara-magrv.   " Packing Type Code
*& Packing Type Description
read table itvegrt into wtvegrt with key magrv = imara-magrv.
xpackdesc = wtvegrt-bezei. " Packing Type Description
*& Receipt Date
read table ieket into weket with key ebeln = v_ebeln.
xrcpdt = weket-eindt.      " Receipt Date
*& Report Total
tmenge = tmenge + xmenge.
tvalue = tvalue + xvalue.
*& Serial No. increment
endloop.
=====================================================================
Thanks and Regards,
Yogesh Pathak

Did you debug and check the umber of values in internal table before calling the TABLE Node....
seeing all SELECT SINGLE along with WHERE = condition and no loop call on them, my assumption is there will be on record only. Check in Debug mood. Search forum to find how to debug a smartform.

Only one vendor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for