Only with administrator rights?

Hi,
when I launch the web page www.vh-t.de on my XP machine
(fully patched, Flash Player 9 installed) with IE6, I can see in
the middle of the page a little Flash intro - but only with
administrator rights. Without administrator rights there only is a
white area.
Does someone know how to configure the system for making work
Flash animations for normal users as well?
Thanks a lot for a hint.
Regards,
Tim

I ended up finding the solution at this link.
http://forums.adobe.com/message/1770665
Erech_Belt said
5. Aug 14, 2008 7:22 AM in response to: (LeaAnn_Coldren)
Re: Insufficient Rights Window for non-admins after 8.1.2 successful install
Here is the solution I found.
"Renaming %program files%/Common Files/Adobe/updater5 to something else removed the error."
This seems like a brute force approach, but it does work. I checked the event logs after doing this and don't see any errors in the App or System logs. This folder is the location of AdobeUpdater.exe and all of the Adobe .cer files, so it makes sense that this works, but seems like it should generate other errors...
This is not how I wanted to solve the problem but it did solve it.
Justin

Similar Messages

Adobe Updater can be run only by users with administrator rights error on 2003 termianl server

I just installed the latest security update of 8.1.7 on my two terminal servers. Now when each users logs in, they get the following error.
Insufficient Rights (title)
Adobe Updater can be run only by usrs with administrator rights.
They simply click OK and it goes away but it is very annoying. It seems like every time their is an update to Adobe Reader, something goes wrong.
Does anybody have any thoughts on how to stop the Adobe Updater from loading when my users login? Thanks,
Justin

I ended up finding the solution at this link.
http://forums.adobe.com/message/1770665
Erech_Belt said
5. Aug 14, 2008 7:22 AM in response to: (LeaAnn_Coldren)
Re: Insufficient Rights Window for non-admins after 8.1.2 successful install
Here is the solution I found.
"Renaming %program files%/Common Files/Adobe/updater5 to something else removed the error."
This seems like a brute force approach, but it does work. I checked the event logs after doing this and don't see any errors in the App or System logs. This folder is the location of AdobeUpdater.exe and all of the Adobe .cer files, so it makes sense that this works, but seems like it should generate other errors...
This is not how I wanted to solve the problem but it did solve it.
Justin

Same user with administrative rights on all the servers in single domain versus domainadmin as a part of administrator group in all the servers

same user with administrative rights on all the servers in single domain user as a part of administrator group in all the servers:
same user is configured as administrator on all the servers in one domain at windows 2003 server. Should this user be made part of domain admin and then this can be set up in the group of administrator for all the servers.
How this is technically different?
If same user is set up as an administrator on all the servers in domain, will it have the same access on all the files as a domain admin user?
dhomya

If the account is not admin on the domaincontrollers and the account is not member of domain admins or any other privileged AD group, the account has only user privileges on AD and thus cannot perform actions like creating and managing accounts,
groups, OUs,policies, sites, ...in other words cannot potentially ruin Active Directory.
I think that is a pretty big difference.
In fact, it is bad practice to perform you daily server management with an AD privileged account.
In regards of file access. The domain administrator will be just an admin, and thus has the privilies assigned to the local admin group, just as any other admin. But if it are different accounts they might be member of different groups assigning different
privileges. Always be carefull when assuming resulting privileges will be the same.
MCP/MCSA/MCTS/MCITP

Secure, multi-section form with administrative rights

I want to create a form that has sections we'll call "yes", "no", and "maybe". Only one section is visible at any time, and only someone with administrative rights can choose which section is visible. Once the section is chosen and the form saved, that section cannot be changed by anyone without admin rights. Can this be done in Acrobat?
The proposed use process would go something like this:
1. Admin receives order and pulls the form.
2. Admin clicks "yes", "no", or "maybe" (tab? radio button?) to reveal the applicable section.
3. Admin fills in some portions, saves the form, and passes it down the line.
4. Down the line, the form is opened and the rest of the form is filled. If "yes", "no" or "maybe" is clicked, nothing happens because this user has no admin rights.
5. The completed form is saved.
I know it would save a lot of effort to make three separate forms. The reason for the single, multi-section form is so the other two sections can be filled on a later date. This saves the effort of refilling the other parts of the form with same data, or changing same data on three separate forms. In addition, admin can open a filled form and click among the different sections to review each section off the one form.
Did that make sense? If so, can it be done in Acrobat?

Please also tell me if what I have in mind can't be done so I can stop chasing this idea.

TCP works only with IP right?

TCP works only with IP right? Then if I want to communicate with a devise that does not have an IP (my television) I cannot use TCP right?
Regards,
Sim085

Why would I post without being 100% correct:
Just trying to point out at a high level that if you use something else to move the TCP then you'll eventually have to implement the functionality that IP gives you.
To those that insist that you HAVE to use IP to move TCP, the answer to that is NO! That's like saying that IP has to use Ethernet. You don't. All IP provides is addressing and routing.
An example of an IP alternative is TULIP: http://www.techiwarehouse.com/cms/engine.php?page_id=2b7e10ac
A network diagram that uses TCP and NO IP:
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/4058/ftp:zSzzSzpaul.rutgers.eduzSzpubzSzbadrizSzitcp-tr314.pdf/bakre95itcp.pdf#page=5
(ejb, please refer to your own post about misinformation.)
The port is in the TCP layer. Sorry, wasn't thinking there. Actually what I was thinking about is how more expensive NICs can decide if it should look past the IP header of a packet. By being able to ignore IP addresses it is not assigned it can save CPU time. Checking to see if it should listen to a port would be cool too, but that would take too much. A machine will only have a few IP addresses (at least one in the class A,B,C range, maybe a multicast address, at least one broadcast address) which wouldn't take much to store in the NIC. Listening to 1000s of ports is not unheard of.
For the author:
I'd design your chat program with two basic interfaces in mind. There will be guaranteed delivery and best effort. TCP gives you a grantee that either the packet gets to the receiving station or the sender gets an error. That's great until you want to talk Bluetooth.
Bluetooth, IR, and Serial comms are all basically the same in the WinTel world. You talk to them over a COMM port. Here you have no guarantee of delivery. Thus in the old days of downloading you had to use a protocol like ZModem to transmit files and make sure you got them all.
You'll need to implement you own guarantee of delivery for these. Basically look into what TCP provides and implement something similar with Java. Checksum, sequence number, and acks.
When you implement your chat, part of your own "network stack" would decide if it needed to transmit service guarantee information with the data at the application level or not. There is no point in incurring the overhead if TCP is being used.
UDP may work, but I don't trust it past a LAN. Some UDP packets will always be dropped by a router. One example is broadcast packets. I doubt any admins will let a broadcast come into their router. Also, because viruses propagate by broadcasting, a lot of admins may limit them to the subnet of the host. UPD is real good for streaming audio. Something when if you lose a packet you don�t want to recover it. If you�re listening to a game on the radio and there is a lightning strike. Would you rather hear the pop and still be in sync with the broadcast or do you want to fall a second or two behind �live� coverage? I think that UPD packets are more readily dropped by a congested router. That's working on the theory that "If the application doesn't care about the packet really getting there (it would have used TCP) then why should I when I'm too busy."

Cannot access folders and files even with Administrator rights

Hours & days gone trying to solve niggling issues that Microsoft cannot fix (using the built-in diagnosis tools/compatibility options/MS promises to advise when solutions found). But I am stopped from progress by restrictions to folder & file access preventing self-diagnosis. Why are administrator rights not effective? How do I as Administrator give myself access rights? If not available how do I return to XP and retrieve the cost of Windows 7? Note that the PC compatibility test tool for Win7 upgrade from XP noted no significant problems!

It appears that these are symbolic links and that WIn7 hasn't got the wherewithal to follow the symlink to the real folder to assess the security settings. - Hence everyone's frustration.
For those of us who are extremely technical, we'd like to be able to remove and re-create a link as needed to test a scenario...
I've done it for years with Altos Xenix, SCO Xenix, SCO OS/5, AIX and Linux from Caldera 2.2 through todays versions... Windows has been moving in a direction to incorporate more *nix like concepts as they move away from their DOS orientation, but in the process
they have focused on the "general user" at the expense of the "administrative user" (i.e. "root" in *nix)
I've always wanted to try a stripped down, non-backwards compatible, Windows Server. I'm sure it could be made admin-friendly and allow push updates without spending thousands of dollars on push-update software mechanisms... But so far, they've missed the boat.
I have 1 Win7Prof PC at home, 1 Mac and 2 Debian systems. Both the Win and OS/X systems make it very hard to administer/customize/etc. the OS. The 2 Debian systems give more bang for the buck and don't inhibit the root user at all once you make 2 changes (using
"su root" as a user) in /etc/pam.d to allow logging into the desktop as root.
We can always hope MS will see those of us who recommend server platforms as a market at some point. (Wouldn't it be awesome to have basic *nix constructs available for admins? And "bash" vs. "cmd"?)
I certainly don't see any need to utilize Windows except in those cases where some vendor/site is compatible with MS/IE only. There are a few of them and I rail on them constantly to be platform independent. Our software is. It takes a lot of work, but
we use Apache/MySQL/PHP to deliver our medical practice management application from any of the *nix-OS/X-WinServer server platforms to anyone who has Chrome/FireFox/Safari/Opera/IE or
similar browsers. But administering the server platform under Windows is about 5 times more time intensive to install and about 10 times more time intensive to maintain than *nix platforms.
We have about 200 Linux servers we are able to support with 4 staff. We have about 50 Windows servers we are able to support with 4 staff.
With numbers like that, I don't see us leaning toward Windows in the foreseeable future.

CS5 Updates only with Administrator Privileges?

Hi!
I installed CS5 Design Premium on several PCs in the company as administrator, the Users dont have administrator-privileges. The problem is, that CS5 does prompt for updates very often at the moment, and the users cant apply them. Is there a way to let them apply the updates without administrator privileges? I dont want to update this much PCs on my own and i dont want to give the users admin privs, of course
Cheers & thanks for help,
Chris

We made a "hack" to get this possibillity under CS4.
You have to look into "runaspc.exe" in order to get it to work.
That's the way we did it.
Not an ideal solution but Adobe has not yet managed to their updates to work with eg WSUS or similar.
They have however released their Adobe Update Server, but that doesn't help one bit as the update procedure still needs administrative rights.

Users with Administrator rights not being allowed to install programs.

I have 3 users in my office that are not able to download and install programs due to a security prompt that says that they are unable to install the program due to not having administrator rights. But in the users menu the user accounts are setup with
full administrator rights. Is this a common problem?

Hi,
Are they domain administrator or local administrator? Is there any group policy restriction?
Please refer to this similar thread:
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-desktop/unable-to-install-program-and-getting-error-do-not/cd28bdae-ae0c-4dcc-96cb-00fb2490dd24
Karen Hu
TechNet Community Support

Does UCCX 8.5.1 Historical Reporting Client run only with admin rights?

I installed UCCX 8.5.1 Historical Reporting Client on a Windows Vista machine. When I try to open it as a regular user, it gives me an error message "Unexpected error: Quitting". I can only open it when I log into the machine as administrator. Does anyone know this is the normal behaviour? If so, then every supervisor of my contact center will need to have admin rights in the computer?

hi,
The Historical Reports client uses Windows's secondary logon service. It uses this to run
the software with the CiscoHistRptUsr when the agent or supervisor is logged into the PC
with their own account. This is the service that gives you the Run As option when you
right click on executables. Check to see if they have this ability on the PC, and make
sure the "Secondary Logon" service shows as Started in the Windows services (Run -->
Services.msc)"
So, on one of the PCs with the issue, look for Secondary Login: Start >Settings >
Control Panel > Administrative Tools > Services. Scroll down to Secondary Logon and
verify that this service is started.
Also, if the service is running, please look for the application, right click on it and
select "Run as Administrator"
Hope that helps!
Thanks,
Karthik

Parallels only with administrator user

Hi,
I discovered the following:
After upgrading to leopard I had to reinstall parallels. This worked fine so far. Than I found a difference between the two MacBooks we have. With one installation it worked fine and with the other Parallels crashes every time.
The only difference is:
- With one installation my default user is "standard", with the other MacBook the default user is "administrator". With an user as administrator Parallels works fine, with a standard user it does not work. The situation is that the installation on both MacBooks has been done with an administration user. So on the second MacBook the users I used for installation of parallels ("administrator") and for usage "standard" are different. So I assume that problems of Parallels usage is somewhere located with rights management of files.
Any ideas?
Best, Fernando

Best you post this at the Parallels forum (forums.parallels.com); you'll probably get a quicker response.

Set up an account with administrator rights, but did not choose a password for it

Essentially now, cannot complete anything without the non existent password. How do I reset it or create on. It won't let me see my account unless I login as a standard account, then prompts my admin account for a password that does not exist.

Hi Old Pappy59,
All account should be shown in manager account interface when you logon as an administrator if you did not hide them by using register.
I suggest you delete this account and recreate it with a password. Since according to your description you could not see this account in GUI as an administrator, you could run lusrmgr.msc to confirm user information or use
net user command to do this job if this account is really currently existing.
To run lusrmgr.msc
right click start->run->type lusrmgr.msc-> OK
To delete an account
net user [username] /delete
if you don’t want to delete this account, also could create a password for this account.
To create a password for an account
net user [username] [password]
For more information about net user command (also apply to Windows 8):
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/251394/en-us
Regards

GPO task run as user but with administrator right?

We need to change a Java setting in the appdata folder of a restricted user on hundreds of computer.
As they use different user but on local profile, we need to be able to run a task as User but be able to write in a folder that the user don't have access to.
We try to use the Schedtask and run it at the current logon user with the "Run with highest privileges" but this doesn't seem to work
Any input?

> We try to use the Schedtask and run it at the current logon user with
> the "Run with highest privileges" but this doesn't seem to work
Highest privileges is only meaningful when the user is member of local
admins - then (and only then) the task will run with admin privs.
Might be a solution to use GPP files or GPP INI-Files or something like
that. These can run in user GPOs but with system privs.
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

LJ M127fw doesn't print with user rights

Good afternoon.
Printer hp lj m127fw connected via USB doesn't print with user rights in the OS Windows 7 x64. It prints only with administrator rights, although some computers print with user rights without any action. We noticed, as well, that scanning and printing pictures are always available with user rithts.

I would suggest the following: log on as administrator. Click Start, Devices and Printers, right click on the Laserjet M127FW, select Printer Properties, Security. Select Everyone and give permission for printing (and whatever else is desired), Apply.
Bob Headrick, HP Expert
I am not an employee of HP, I am a volunteer posting here on my own time.
If your problem is solved please click the "Accept as Solution" button ------------V
If my answer was helpful please click the "Thumbs Up" to say "Thank You"--V

Installation of SAP Business One client and required administration rights

Dear community,
I would like to kindly ask you for your feedback on the installation of SAP Business One client and its patches on end-user computers.
The pain points I have heard so far are the following:
- The installation of SAP Business One client and its patches has to be started by a user with administrator rights. As far as I know (and please correct me if I am wrong), this is also required in case of installation of any other software.
- End users usually do not have administrator rights and therefore the SAP Business One clients have to be manually upgraded by administrator. This is time consuming (and therefore costly) activity.
We are considering to design a new solution which would overcome the above limitations.
I would like to confirm with you if my understanding is correct:
Question 1:
Is it a common situation that the end-users of SAP Business One client do not have administrator rights and therefore cannot install the patches of SAP Business One client by themselves?
If yes, how do you resolve this currently?
Question 2:
Do you use Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager or Active Directory (or any other 3rd party solution) to automatically distribute software packages and updates to client PCs at your customers?
Question 3:
If the SAP Business One client installation (and its patches) is delivered as MSI package with silent installation capability, would you be able to automate the deployment of B1 client updates to client PC using the abovementioned technologies? Or can you still see some obstacles?
Thank you
Best regards
Jan Ruzarovsky
SAP Business One Product Management

Dear all,
Thank you very much for your comments, very helpful!
@Marco - SAP Business One 8.8 client currently does not support the silent installation / upgrade. However we are currently considering this requirement and we would like to deliver it as soon as possible.
We are currently considering several possible designs. One of them is as follows:
1. A new SAP Business One Updater Service will be installed on each client workstation.
It will be a windows service installed and running under a local system account.
2. The updater service will check regularly if there are any new patches of SAP Business One client or add-ons uploaded to a configured shared directory.
3. If a new patch is found in the shared directory, the updater service will SILENTLY install the new patch (add-ons, SAP Business One) on the client workstation.
The service would be able to install patches even if nobody is logged in.
Questions:
If we consider the above design, there are a few open topics:
1. During the upgrade of the SAP Business One server, the client patches (and SAP add-on patches, partner add-ons) would be placed to a SHARED directory instead of into SBO-Common (as it is implemented currently).
- Does this have any impact on your tools, processes or add-ons?
2. SAP Business One upgrade wizard will put the latest patch of SAP Business One client into a configured shared directory. The shared directory will have to be read-only for everybody in the network to avoid that the valid installation files are replaced by malware or virus infected files
- Can you configure such a shared directory?
From customer perspective, if a new patch is put into the shared directory, the updater service can behave as follows:
1. Manually initiated upgrade of the client
Example: Customer starts the old (not upgraded) SAP Business One client. The client will inform him/her that a new patch has been found and it has to be installed in order to continue working with the client. After customer clicks "Yes", the upgrader service starts the silent installation of the client and informs customer about the progress. Once the upgrade is finished, the upgraded SAP Business One client will be started automatically.
2. Automatic update:
- Update the client automatically (e.g. overnight) if customer is not working with SAP Business One
- If SAP Business One client is running, ask customer if he/she wishes to upgrade the client now or to delay the upgrade by X minutes.
Question: Which of the above two scenarios would you and your customers prefer?
If the upgrade is fully silent, automated and handled by the upgrader service, Is it acceptable for customers to trigger the installation manually and wait till the client is upgraded? Or would they prefer to have the client updated for them e.g. overnight so they can immediately start to work?
Best regards
Jan
Edited by: Jan Ruzarovsky on Sep 29, 2010 9:37 AM

Can't burn a DVD without Administrator Rights

Hi,
We don't allow our users to run with administrator rights on our domain. If we take away the admin rights, they can't burn a DVD, but if I do a RunAs Administrator on Premiere Elements, they can. How can I run P.E. without admin rights so they can burn a DVD? We are running Windows XP SP3, 32bit mode. Thanks.

Aside from Hunt's idea of writing the output to a folder and using the free Imgburn to write to a disc (have you tried that?) you have just run up against one of the design limitations of all flavors of Premiere... Elements and the various versions of Premiere Pro
The products are simply not DESIGNED to run in a network environment... they are meant to be used by one user on one computer, with full rights to be able to use all functions
I don't know what to suggest, but you may need to find a different product, if Hunt's suggestion does not work for you
Do note that I do NOT work for Adobe... but I've been reading these forums for many years, and the answers I've seen have all been the same... the products just are not designed to, and do not work in a network environment
Even using PPro/Encore CS5, due to Win7 settings, whereI am the owner and only user of the software, I must right click the Encore icon and select Run as Administrator when I want to create a dual layer DVD... but not when I'm creating a single layer DVD
For your situation... I've never seen a solution other than full Administrator rights to use all program functions

Only with administrator rights?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for