Option 43 in Cisco CNR

I'm trying to get my CNR configure to work with Option 43 for 1240 series.
So far I didn't have any luck.
Can somebody help me.
I just upgraded to 6.2
IP address of management controller is 172.24.1.5
vendor-option create "Cisco c1240"

# create a vendor-option
vendor-option cisco_ap_c1240 create "Cisco AP c1240"
vendor-option cisco_ap_c1240 definesuboption controller 241 BYTE_ARRAY
vendor-option cisco_ap_c1240 set read-only=enabled
# link to a policy
policy WLANPOL setVendorOption cisco_ap_c1240 controller 0a:0b:0c:0d
# disable failover
scope WLANPOL set failover=scope-disabled
0a:0b:0c:0d ... is the hex number of your WLAN controller IP address

Similar Messages

Multiple Scopes for the same subnet with Cisco CNR

I have a requeriment from my internal client that he wants to have multiple scopes within the same /21 subnet , but he wants to have different scopes for each group of servers ( in the /21 subnet).
We have 2 Cisco CNR ( I dont know the version they are running because they are managed by an external vendor) but they are in active / standby mode.
My question is .. it is posible to make the CNR have different scopes (ranges of IP's) for the same subnet ( /21) and assign those based on the client ( I dont know what criteria can be followed .. maybe Mac Address ???).
I appreciate any help or pointing to the right documentation
Thank you in advanced

I don't know that you would want a separate PO print. You can print the same PO print twice to provide a copy for the freight vendor. I think it should be okay as long as it is clear that the PO is with the vendor for the products but there is a condition specifying the freight deal. The second vendor (say the freight vendor) should be okay with this PO as well. I don't remember how the standard SAP PO forms handled the vendor condition but it should be enough I would think. I never came across a separate PO for freight since it is usually an value added service that is an integrated part of shipping goods and the paper-work usually is leveraged from PO, bill-of-lading, etc. SAP will make it difficult if you do need a separate PO since there is no way to use account assignment to material and therefore would need to manually account code and invoice verification, post to a clearing account in FI for re-class to material or charge to internal order with settlement to material or something like this.
I would just make sure that the PO print makes sense in terms of being able to see the freight charge and maybe the vendor name or something (look at the standard SAP PO form to see what the best practice is).

Disabling the unlimited Lifetime option in Cisco WCS Guest User Creation

Is there a way to disable the unlimited Lifetime option in Cisco WCS Guest User Add/Schedule tab.If i make those fields uneditable, it just takes out the option to schedule any meetings in future.Using Cisco WCS version 7.0.220.0.

i'm also searching for an solution to disable the unlimited lifetime button for the Lobby Ambassador.
could it that Cisco introduces this maybe a future release?
couldn't be that there are only few people who are disappointed with this solution.
My Customer is thinking now that cisco isn't the right solution for him.

Need to Create More Options in Cisco ACS 5.2 User section

Hi Team,
I Need to create more options on Cisco ACS 5.2 under internal identity store in users. please help how to do add, default not showing all.
i have seen on internet. attaching doc.
Regards
MR

To create additional attributes for internal users do the following:
- go to System Administration > Configuration > Dictionaries > Identity > Internal Users
- Press Create to define the additional attributes you require
For each attribute can
- define the type
- give a default value. This will be applied to all existing users and appear as default when new user is created
- indicate whether the attribute is required and must be defined for each user
- define a policy condition. If define such a condition will appear as an option when customize rules in a policy

Can't see USB printer option in Cisco Connect

Just fired up an e4200 router and was realy easy and everything working great HOWEVER I can a Canon MP490 printer that I have connected to the router via USB and Cisco Connect is only showing Wireless Printers as a connection option!!
I am on a MAC using OS X 10.7, have Cisco Connect Version 1.4 (12005.2) and the firmware updated today.
Any ideas?

The Windows version has an option for "Printers" that leads to options for a wireless printer and a USB printer after Cisco Connect Installation where as in Mac you will get the only option for wireless. Since, Cisco Connect does not have an added feature of providing USB printing with the MAC OX.

FCoE options for Cisco UCS and Compellent SAN

Hi,
We have a Dell Compellent SAN storage with iSCSI and FCoE module in pre-production environment.
It is connected to new Cisco UCS infrastructure (5108 Chassis with 2208IOM + B200 M2 Blades + 6248 Fabric Interconnect) via 10G iSCSI module (FCoE module isn't being used at th is moment).
I reviewed compatibility matrix on interconnect but Compellent (Dell) SAN is only supported on FI NXOS 1.3(1), 1.4(1) without using 6248 and 2208 IOM which is what we have. I'm sure some of you have similar hardware configuration as ours and I'd like to see if there's any supportive Cisco FC/FCoE deployment option for the Compellent. We're pretty tight on budget at this moment so purchasing couple of Nexus 5K switches or something equipvalent for such a small number of chassis (only only have one) is not a preferred option. If additional hardware acquisition is inevitable, what would be the most cost effective solution to be able to support FCoE implementation?
Thank you in advance for your help on this.

Unfortunatly there isn't really one - with direct attach storage there is still the requirement that an upstream MDS/N5k pushes the zoning to it. Without a MDS to push the zoning the system it's recommended for production.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/gui/config/guide/2.0/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter_0101.html#concept_05717B723C2746E1A9F6AB3A3FFA2C72
Even if you had a MDS/N5K the 6248/2208's wouldn't support the Compellent SAN - see note 9.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/mds9000/interoperability/matrix/Matrix8.pdf
That's not to say that it won't work, it's just that we haven't tested it and don't know what it will do and thus TAC cannot troubleshoot SAN errors on the UCS.
On the plus side iSCSI if setup correctly can be very solid and can give you a great amount of throughput - just make sure to configure the QoS correctly and if you need more throughput then just add some additional links

Is there any option on Cisco Unified CM Administration 9.1.1 to show caller ID number when using MOBILITY option?

Dear All,
I am using Cisco Unified CM Administration 9.1.1 and MOBILITY works fine.
However when somebody calls from external phone number into internal user number and MOBILITY option is ON and obviously, forwards the call for the user's cell.....in this case user can see only main company number, but not a caller number.
So, is there any option to change it?
Thank you

Go to the GW and run some debugs to find out exactly what you're sending, chances are, your telco is overwriting the original called number as it's nor part of your DID range.
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

Antenna Options for Cisco 1941w router

Hi All,
I have a 1941w router which I would like to extend the 3 MIMO antennas as the unit is installed in our comms cabinet.
Really need help in choosing the correct antenna for this unit, if possible as well as extending the length increase the gain for better reception, been looking at 3x AIR-ANT1728 but these only run at 2.4GHz where the 1941w has both 2.4 and 5GHz.
If anyone has any information for me I would be most grateful.
Thanks
Ben

I take this back. Maybe the newly-released AIR-ANT2547V-N might work. You need to investigate it out because I have no other information other than the product number.

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) Version 1.2: What's New in Features and Troubleshooting Options

With Ali Mohammed
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about what’s new in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) Version 1.2 and to understand the new features and enhanced troubleshooting options with Cisco expert Ali Mohammed.
Cisco ISE can be deployed as an appliance or virtual machine to enforce security policy on all devices that attempt to gain access to network infrastructure. ISE 1.2 provides feature enrichment in terms of mobile device management, BYOD enhancements, and so on. It also performs noise suppression in log collection so customers have greater ability to store and analyze logs for a longer period.
Ali Mohammed is an escalation engineer with the Security Access and Mobility Product Group (SAMPG), providing support to all Cisco NAC and Cisco ISE installed base. Ali works on complicated recreations of customer issues and helps customers in resolving configuration, deployment, setup, and integration issues involving Cisco NAC and Cisco ISE products. Ali works on enhancing tools available in ISE/NAC that are required to help troubleshoot the product setup in customer environments. Ali has six and a half years of experience at Cisco and is CCIE certified in security (number 24130).
Remember to use the rating system to let Ali know if you have received an adequate response.
Because of the volume expected during this event, Ali might not be able to answer each question. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the Security community, sub-community shortly after the event. This event lasts through September 6, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other community members.

Hi Ali,
We currently have a two-node deployment running 1.1.3.124, as depicted in diagram:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/upgrade_guide/b_ise_upgrade_guide_chapter_010.html#ID89
Question 1:
After step 1 is done, node B becomes the new primary node.
What's the license impact at that stage, when the license is mainly tied to node A, the previous primary PAN?
Step 3 says to obtain a new license that's tied to both node A & node B, as if it's implying an issue would arise, if we leave node B as the primary PAN, instead of reverting back to node A.
=========
Question 2:
When step 1 is completed, node B runs 1.2, while node A runs 1.1.3.124.
Do both nodes still function as PSN nodes, and can service end users at that point? (before we proceed to step 2)
Both nodes are behind our ACE load balancer, and I'm trying to confirm the behavior during the upgrade, to determine when to take each node out of the load balancing serverfarm, to keep the service up and avoid an outage.
===========
Question 3:
According to the upgrade guide, we're supposed to perform a config backup from PAN & MnT nodes.
Is the config backup used only when we need to rollback from 1.2 to 1.1.3, or can it be used to restore config on 1.2?
It also says to record customizations & alert settings because after the upgrade to 1.2, these settings would change, and we would need to re-configure them.
Is this correct? That's a lot of screen shots we'll need to take; is there any way to avoid this?
It says: "
Disable services such as Guest, Profiler, Device Onboarding, and so on before upgrade and enable them after upgrade. Otherwise, you must add the guest users who are lost, and devices must be profiled and onboarded again."
Exactly how do you disable services? Disable all the authorization policies?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/upgrade_guide/b_ise_upgrade_guide_chapter_01.html#reference_4EFE5E15B9854A648C9EF18D492B9105
==================
Question 4:
The 1.1 user guide says the maximum number of nodes in a node group was 4.
The 1.2 guide now says the maximum is 10.
Is there a hard limit on how many nodes can be in a node group?
We currently don't use node group, due to the lack of multicast support on the ACE-20.
Is it a big deal not to have one?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/security/ise/1.2/user_guide/ise_dis_deploy.html#wp1230118
thanks,
Kevin

CNR 6.1.2 request bufffers incrementing until it reaches 500

Hi, We are running Cisco CNR 6.1.2 build #6.1.2.0501131448 and this has been very reliable for over 5 years, just recently in the last 4 weeks have began experiencing a problem where the DHCP server will stop issuing leases in response to discovers. A reload of the dhcp application fixes the problem.
In troubleshooting I see in the name_dhcp_1_log where during normal operation the log indicates that the request buffers have 2 or 3 in use at any one time. I will see a DHCP DISCOVER, or REQUEST come in and at the end of the entry it will show "3 in use" or "2 in use" and toggles between 2 and 3, then _something_ occurs and I begin to see the DISCOVER, and REQUEST entries will indicate that the buffers "in use" is incrementing... "4 in use" 5 in use" etc, until at some point the server will stop serving out leases in response to those DISCOVERS and REQUESTS. The request buffer size is set to 500 ( default) and the response buffer is set to 1000 ( default to twice the size of request buffer) and ultimately the log entries will indicate that the buffers in use will continue to increment until it reaches 500.
Again, this application has been running silently fo over 5 years without this issue, I dont know if some recent DHCP activity is causing this problem, or if it is some recent corruption to the CNR application, or a problem with the OS ( running solaris 8 )
Has anyone see anything similar, or have any ideas on what I might check?
Thanks
Paul

Hi Paul,
Check out this known bug:
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCsf98245
Release-note:
===
In the event that a lease to a client is denied because the server is configured to use
limitation-counts, and the limitation-count for this limitation-id (i.e., subscriber) has
been exceeded and there is no over-limit-client-class, then if (and only if) there is a
dhcp-requested-address option in the request packet and the IP address specified is not
configured in the same Network as the giaddr specified in the DHCPDISCOVER, then the DHCP
server will not properly release the request packet after it concludes the processing.
Eventually the DHCP server will use up all of its configured request packets and will
hang.
This will result in an increasing "in-use" count in the activity summary and in the
incoming-requests log message (number 04619). This problem can only occur if message
number 05646 appears, but it will not always occur when this message appears. It will only
occur when message 05646 appears and when the dhcp-requested-address option also contains
an IP address not in the current Network configuration.
The workaround for this problem is to give the client-class which contains the
limitation-id an over-limit-client-class, and to also ensure that the
over-limit-client-class specifies a selection-criteria that does not exist in any scope.
This will cause the packet to be dropped, not because there is no overlimit client-class
(message number 05646) but because there are no scopes which satisfy the criterion
specified in the over-limit-client-class (message number 04441).
Fixed in 6.1.6. HTH. Else a TAC case might be warranted.

Cisco Jabber for Windows 9.2.6 (setting registry keys)

All,
I would like to be able to set the general option for Cisco Jabber to force the client to, "Start Ciso Jabber when my computer starts" option. Is this a registry setting I can force? I'd also like to force calendar intergration with Microsoft Outlook by default as well. We are using SCCM to push Jabber via RAP. Are these registry settings HKCU or HKLM? Thanks Phillip

Hi Phillip,
you may find more details on Installation and Configuration guide how to set Start_Client_On_Start_OS parameter in jabberConfig file.
Keep in mind that values set in JabberlocalConfig.xml have presedence over value set in jabberConfig.xml file from TFTP server.
Regards,
Nebojsa

When login to Cisco Jabber Movie, showing no more license

Dear Gurus,
We have VCS+TMS+MCU, with TMS Provisioning extension license and 25 Movie client license. This is a new setup, When I am trying to login on Cisco jabber client either on Ipad or PC, it showing no more license message. Kindly advsie on that.
License detail is given below.
Total client solution package license 0
Available Client solution package license 0
Total System License 10
Available system license 9
Total Provisioning Licenses 25
Available Provisioning License 25
Used provisioning license 0
Secondly advise how I can associate user with the device, like Ipad, EX90 etc. We haev integrated the TMS and VCS with AD, users are imported to TMS Phone book, Cisco Jabebr for Ipad template is insatlled on TMS and associate with users. In device provisioing I can not see any device on TMS.
I have gone through the following page, but I cant see any user account option on Cisco VCSC.
http://www.ucguerrilla.com/2012/11/provisioning-cisco-jabber-for-ipad-on.html
Kindly advise me with your valuable inputs.
Irfan

Hello Muhammad!
Great to see that you fixed it yourself.
Thank you for giving a feedback +5!

Outbound Call in Cisco Finesse

Anybody please help what all configuration to be done in Finesse to do the outbound calls.
I am using Cisco UCCX 10.0, in which i have both the option for Cisco CAD and Finesse. When i run a outbound campaign its coming as an incoming call in Finesse.
When i answer the call, its showing the error "Unable to communicate with Enterprise Server. Outbound option not available".
Please help how to enable the outbound controls in Finesse

This is ineed the case, from RN (somewhat cryptic :-) ):
Cisco Finesse
Cisco Finesse is the next generation browser-based agent and supervisor desktop for Unified CCX. Finesse is an alternative to Cisco Agent Desktop, Cisco Supervisor Desktop, and Cisco Desktop Administrator. Finesse is available with Enhanced and Premium license packages and provides typical inbound voice contact center functionality. It supports Unified Communications Manager-based silent monitoring and workflow-based recording with MediaSense and Work Force Optimization (WFO).
Chris

Cisco UCS with FEX system Component requirements

Hi ,
I am looking for quick suggestion for required components to have a VMware vSAN implemented using FEX system with maximum Fabric trough put. Ideally a configuration for without multipath using single Fabric switch and later on to be able to upgrade to Multipath fabric.
We are in great rush to provide POC concept and was looking if you folks can suggest me on this. If need be you want to talk to me more in detail I can available.
Appreciate your help here.
Who can I reach to able to pull up build and quote the configurations for implementing complete UCS solution.
Are these below components absolutely required ?
2 x Nexus 2232PP 10GE Fabric Extenders
The Cisco Nexus 2232PP 10GE provides 32 x 10Gb loss-less low latency Ethernet and Fiber Channel Over Ethernet (FCoE) Small Form-Factor Pluggable Plus (SFP+) server ports and eight 10 Gb Ethernet and FCoE SFP+ uplink ports in a compact 1 rack unit (1RU) form factor. They enable Seamless inclusion of UCS rack servers into UCS Manager domain with UCS blade servers when connected to the UCS 6200 Fabric Interconnects, providing converged LAN, SAN, and management connectivity.
We currently have these below servers :
2 x UCSC-BASE-M2-C460
        524 GB RAM
        No SSDs
        No VIC Card
        4 x SAS 1 TB Drives
        1 x L1 Intel 1 Gbps Ethernet Adapter
        1 x L2 10Gbps Ethernet Adapter
        1 x LSI Mega RAID SAS 9240-8i (no RAID 5 support, Need a card that supports RAID5)
1 x UCSC-C240-M3L
        132 GB RAM
        30 TB SAS HDD
        1 x VIC Card
        1 x Intel I350 Gigabit Ethernet Card with 4 ports
        1 x LSI Mega RAID SAS 9240-8i (no RAID 5 support, Need a card that supports RAID5)
1 x 5548UP Nexus Switch ( Will I be able to use this switch in place of Nexus 2232PP 10GE Fabric Extenders to achieve complete UCS solution)

Cisco UCS Manager 2.2 supports an option to connect the C-Series Rack-Mount Server directly to the Fabric Interconnects. You do not need the Fabric Extenders. This option enables Cisco UCS Manager to manage the C-Series Rack-Mount Servers using a single cable for both management traffic and data traffic.
If you need high performance low latency (storage, for VMware VSAN), direct connection to UCS Fabric Interconnect and/or N5k is recommended.

Cisco NAC Web Agent + Windows 8

Hello,
I´m implementing a Cisco ISE 1.2 and I am having troubles with NAC Web Agent and Windows 8 compatibility.
All time that I try install NAC Web Agent in Windows 8, I get the message "Agent User Operating System is Not Supported".
Follow are some informations about my Environment:
ISE 1.2 Patch 3
OS: Windows 8 Enterprise
IE: 10 (In Desktop Mode w and w/o Compatibility View)
NAC Web Agent: 4.9.0.1007
Could you help me ?
Best Regards,
Daniel Stefani

Hi Charles,
I can download all this files, but I can’t import it in ISE Resourses.
NAC Agent MST files
nacagentsetup-mst-4.9.3.9.zip
NAC Agent MSI Installation file
nacagentsetup-win-4.9.3.9.msi
NAC Agent Installation Package
nacagentsetup-win-4.9.3.9.tar.gz
Mac Agent Installation Package for MacOSX
CCAAgentMacOSX-4.9.3.803.tar.gz
NAC Agent MST files
nacagentsetup-mst-4.9.3.5.zip
NAC Agent MSI Installation file
nacagentsetup-win-4.9.3.5.msi
NAC Agent Installation Package
nacagentsetup-win-4.9.3.5.tar.gz
In this link that you sent me doesn’t have options to Cisco NAC Web Agent.
But in the follow yes…
http://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=283801620&flowid=26081&softwareid=283802505&release=1.2&relind=AVAILABLE&rellifecycle=&reltype=latest
Best Regards,
Daniel Stefani

Option 43 in Cisco CNR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for