ORA-1653 during upgrade db

Hello!
I see in alert.log during upgrade 10.2.0.5 -11.2.0.3
ORA-1653: unable to extend table SYS.SETTINGS$ by 8 in tablespace SYSTEM
ORA-1653: unable to extend table SYS.SETTINGS$ by 8 in tablespace SYSTEM
ORA-1653: unable to extend table SYS.SETTINGS$ by 8 in tablespace SYSTEM
ORA-1653: unable to extend table SYS.SETTINGS$ by 8 in tablespace SYSTEM
ORA-1653: unable to extend table SYS.SETTINGS$ by 8 in tablespace SYSTEMShould I restart catupgrd.sql ?
Thanks and regards,
Pavel

Pavel wrote:
Hello!
I see in alert.log during upgrade 10.2.0.5 -11.2.0.3
ORA-1653: unable to extend table SYS.SETTINGS$ by 8 in tablespace SYSTEM
ORA-1653: unable to extend table SYS.SETTINGS$ by 8 in tablespace SYSTEM
ORA-1653: unable to extend table SYS.SETTINGS$ by 8 in tablespace SYSTEM
ORA-1653: unable to extend table SYS.SETTINGS$ by 8 in tablespace SYSTEM
ORA-1653: unable to extend table SYS.SETTINGS$ by 8 in tablespace SYSTEMShould I restart catupgrd.sql ?
Thanks and regards,
Pavelyou should make SYSTEM tablespace larger

Similar Messages

ORA-00604,ORA-00600,ORA-1652,ORA-1653,ORA-00257 errors

Hi All,
I am getting the below alerts in my Oracle 9i database.
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 3
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kghpih:ds], [
ORA-1652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace           TS_PHDB_5
ORA-1653: unable to extend table T49XPWM.TMP_PD_VALUES by 128 in           tablespace TS_PHDB_5
ORA-1652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace           TS_PHDB_16
ORA-00257: archiver error. Connect internal only, until freed.
ORA-604 signalled during: ALTER DATABASE CLOSE NORMAL...
Saswat

This error does not necessarily indicate whether or not you have enough space
in the tablespace, it merely indicates that Oracle could not find a large enough area of free
contiguous space in which to fit the next extent.
add datafile to your table space.
Edited by: Asad99 on Apr 1, 2013 3:59 AM

ORA-39126 during an export of a partition via dbms_datapump

Hi ,
i did export using datapump in command line everything went fine but while exporting via dbms_datapump i got this:
ORA-39126 during an export of a partition via dbms_datapump
ORA-00920
'SELECT FROM DUAL WHERE :1' P20060401
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SYS_ERROR", line 95
ORA-06512: at "SYS.KUPW$WORKER", line 6228
the procedure is:
PROCEDURE pr_depura_bitacora
IS
l_job_handle NUMBER;
l_job_state VARCHAR2(30);
l_partition VARCHAR2(30);
v_sql VARCHAR2(2000);
BEGIN
-- Create a user-named Data Pump job to do a "table:partition-level" export
-- Local
select 'P'|| to_char((select min(STP_LOG_DATE) from SAI_AUDITBITACORA),'YYYYMM')||'01'
into l_partition
from user_tab_partitions
where table_name = 'SAI_AUDITBITACORA'
and rownum = 1;
l_partition := rtrim (l_partition,' ');
l_job_handle:= DBMS_DATAPUMP.OPEN
operation=>'EXPORT',
job_mode =>'TABLE',
job_name =>'EXPORT_ORACLENSSA'
-- Schema filter
DBMS_DATAPUMP.METADATA_FILTER
handle => l_job_handle,
name => 'SCHEMA_EXPR',
value => 'IN (''ORACLENSSA'')'
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Added filter for schema list');
-- Table filter
DBMS_DATAPUMP.METADATA_FILTER
handle => l_job_handle,
name => 'NAME_EXPR',
value => '=''SAI_AUDITBITACORA'''
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Added filter for table expression');
-- Partition filter
DBMS_DATAPUMP.DATA_FILTER
handle => l_job_handle,
name => 'PARTITION_EXPR',
value => l_partition,
table_name => 'SAI_AUDITBITACORA'
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Partition filter for schema list');
DBMS_DATAPUMP.ADD_FILE
handle => l_job_handle,
filename => 'EXP'||l_partition||'.DMP',
directory => 'EXP_DATA_PUMP',
filetype => 1
DBMS_DATAPUMP.ADD_FILE
handle => l_job_handle,
filename => 'EXP'||l_partition||'.LOG',
directory => 'EXP_DATA_PUMP',
filetype => 3
DBMS_DATAPUMP.START_JOB
handle => l_job_handle,
skip_current => 0
DBMS_DATAPUMP.WAIT_FOR_JOB
handle => l_job_handle,
job_state => l_job_state
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Job completed - job state = '||l_job_state);
DBMS_DATAPUMP.DETACH(handle=>l_job_handle);
END;
I've already drop and recreate the directory, granted read, write to public and to user, grant create session, create table, create procedure, exp_full_database to user, restart the database and the listener with the var LD_LIBRARY pointing first to $ORACLE_HOME/lib, and add more space to temporary tablespace.

The basic problem is:
Error: ORA 920
Text: invalid relational operator
Cause: A search condition was entered with an invalid or missing relational
operator.
Action: Include a valid relational operator such as =, !=, ^=, <>, >, <, >=, <=
, ALL, ANY, [NOT] BETWEEN, EXISTS, [NOT] IN, IS [NOT] NULL, or [NOT]
LIKE in the condition.
Obviously this refers to the invalid statement 'SELECT FROM DUAL ...'. I also recommend, you should contact Oracle Support, because it happens inside an Oracle provided package.
Werner

Error while runnning autoconfig on apps tier during upgrade

Hi,
Error while runnning autoconfig on apps tier during upgrade from 11.5.9 to 11.5.10.2
below is the error message.
Enter the APPS user password :
The log file for this session is located at: /u01/app/tinst/tinstappl/admin/TINST_dba5/log/05031134/adconfig.log
AutoConfig is configuring the Applications environment...
AutoConfig will consider the custom templates if present.
Using APPL_TOP location : /u01/app/tinst/tinstappl
Classpath : /u01/app/tinst/tinstcomn/util/java/1.6/jdk1.6.0_18/jre/lib/rt.jar:/u01/app/tinst/tinstcomn/util/java/1.6/jdk1.6.0_18/lib/dt.jar:/u01/app/tinst/tinstcomn/util/java/1.6/jdk1.6.0_18/lib/tools.jar:/u01/app/tinst/tinstcomn/java/appsborg2.zip:/u01/app/tinst/tinstcomn/java
Using Context file : /u01/app/tinst/tinstappl/admin/TINST_dba5.xml
Context Value Management will now update the Context file
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/jdbc/OracleDriver
at oracle.apps.ad.util.DBUtil.registerDriver(DBUtil.java:153)
at oracle.apps.ad.util.DBUtil.<init>(DBUtil.java:102)
at oracle.apps.ad.tools.configuration.FileSysDBCtxMerge.getDBConnection(FileSysDBCtxMerge.java:759)
at oracle.apps.ad.tools.configuration.FileSysDBCtxMerge.initializeParams(FileSysDBCtxMerge.java:147)
at oracle.apps.ad.tools.configuration.FileSysDBCtxMerge.setParams(FileSysDBCtxMerge.java:128)
at oracle.apps.ad.context.CtxValueMgt.mergeCustomInFiles(CtxValueMgt.java:1762)
at oracle.apps.ad.context.CtxValueMgt.processCtxFile(CtxValueMgt.java:1579)
at oracle.apps.ad.context.CtxValueMgt.main(CtxValueMgt.java:709)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: oracle.jdbc.OracleDriver
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248)
... 8 more
ERROR: Context Value Management Failed.
Terminate.
The logfile for this session is located at:
/u01/app/tinst/tinstappl/admin/TINST_dba5/log/05031134/adconfig.log
Please let me know your suggestions to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Sreenivasulu.

Hi,
DB tier autoconfig was successfully completed.
We have already checked the above mentioned metalink ID's, but still the issue is same.
Can you please advice any other solutions.
Regards,
Sreenivasulu.

Error during Upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

Hi All,
We are facing an error when upgrading from 4.6c to ECC 6.0. We are facing this error on the table COEP - runtime object inconsistancy. What we found is there is ERP upgrade has created new extra fields in the table. In log file the error is specified as : Duplicate Field name, But we not able to find the duplicate field name in the table. Please kindly help as early as possible. The upgrade process is stuck.
Regards
Anil Kumar K

Hi Anil,
Is this issue fixed? Can i know how you fixed it?
replied to your message Re: How to adopt the index changes during upgrade.
Thanks,
Somar

Encountered ora-29701 during Sun Cluster for Oracle RAC 9.2.0.7 startup (UR

Hi all,
Need some help from all out there
In our Sun Cluster 3.1 Data Service for Oracle RAC 9.2.0.7 (Solaris 9) configuration, my team had encountered
ora-29701 *Unable to connect to Cluster Manager*
during the startup of the Oracle RAC database instances on the Oracle RAC Server resources.
We tried the attached workaround by Oracle. This workaround works well for the 1^st time but it doesnt work anymore when the server is rebooted.
Kindly help me to check whether anyone encounter the same problem as the above and able to resolve. Thanks.
Bug No. 4262155
Filed 25-MAR-2005 Updated 11-APR-2005
Product Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition Product Version 9.2.0.6.0
Platform Linux x86
Platform Version 2.4.21-9.0.1
Database Version 9.2.0.6.0
Affects Platforms Port-Specific
Severity Severe Loss of Service
Status Not a Bug. To Filer
Base Bug N/A
Fixed in Product Version No Data
Problem statement:
ORA-29701 DURING DATABASE CREATION AFTER APPLYING 9.2.0.6 PATCHSET
*** 03/25/05 07:32 am ***
TAR:
PROBLEM:
Customer applied 9.2.0.6 patchset over 9.2.0.4 patchset.
While creating the database, customer receives following error:
ORA-29701: unable to connect to Cluster Manager
However, if customer goes from 9.2.0.4 -> 9.2.0.5 -> 9.2.0.6, the problem does not occur.
DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS:
It seems that the problem is with libskgxn9.so shared library.
For 9.2.0.4 -> 9.2.0.5 -> 9.2.0.6, the install log shows the following:
installActions2005-03-22_03-44-42PM.log:,
[libskgxn9.so->%ORACLE_HOME%/lib/libskgxn9.so 7933 plats=1=>[46]langs=1=> en,fr,ar,bn,pt_BR,bg,fr_CA,ca,hr,cs,da,nl,ar_EG,en_GB,et,fi,de,el,iw,hu,is,in, it,ja,ko,es,lv,lt,ms,es_MX,no,pl,pt,ro,ru,zh_CN,sk,sl,es_ES,sv,th,zh_TW, tr,uk,vi]]
installActions2005-03-22_04-13-03PM.log:, [libcmdll.so ->%ORACLE_HOME%/lib/libskgxn9.so 64274 plats=1=>[46] langs=-554696704=>[en]]
For 9.2.0.4 -> 9.2.0.6, install log shows:
installActions2005-03-22_04-13-03PM.log:, [libcmdll.so ->%ORACLE_HOME%/lib/libskgxn9.so 64274 plats=1=>[46] langs=-554696704=>[en]] does not exist.
This means that while patching from 9.2.0.4 -> 9.2.0.5, Installer copies the libcmdll.so library into libskgxn9.so, while patching from 9.2.0.4 -> 9.2.0.6 does not.
ORACM is located in /app/oracle/ORACM which is different than ORACLE_HOME in customer's environment.
WORKAROUND:
Customer is using the following workaround:
cd $ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/lib make -f ins_rdbms.mk rac_on ioracle ipc_udp
RELATED BUGS:
Bug 4169291

Check if following MOS note helps.
Series of ORA-7445 Errors After Applying 9.2.0.7.0 Patchset to 9.2.0.6.0 Database (Doc ID 373375.1)

Error in transaction KEA0 during upgrade

Dear All,
During upgrading the custmer system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 we found some error in the transaction KEA0 while trying to activate the cross client for an operating concern.
The activation logs says that there are the syntax errors in the gereted subroutine pool: RK2O0100.
I however corrected the error and activated the code but again when I am trying to execute the same it gave me the same error and when I go to the sub routine pool I found that the changes are again undone and the previos version is activated. This happens repeatedly that the code is corrected and activated by me and says no error and ones I log off and login again it says the same error.
Help will be appriciated.
Thanks iin advance....
Abhi...

Dear Raymond,
Thankds for your help..........
I tring to run RKEAGENV it shows the error message with STOP button saying that the field WTGBTR not contained in the nametab for table CE1E_B1 and when Io run RKEAGENF it gives a short dump saying that entry for CE10100 is not allowed for TTABS.....
Please help.

Disck Space not enough during upgrade CUCM 9.1(2)SU1 to 9.1(2)SU2a

Hi,
I face an issues during upgrade my current CUCM 9.1(2)SU1 to 9.1(2)SU2a, it show with this error message "There is not enough disk space in the common partition to perform the upgrade, for steps to resolve this condition please refer to CUCM 9.1(1) release notes or view defect CSCuc63312 in bug toolkit on Cisco.com". I had check the bug id and got 2 way to do it:-
1. reduce the amount of traces on the system, but I not ready want to do this
2. install a COP file name: ciscocm.free_common_space_v1.0.cop.sgn
If I select option 2, will it have any risk? Is it mean 9.1(2) - inactive version will be clear out from disk space or it will clear out 2 version - active and inactive version from disk space?
I need have some advice on this before I perform.
Thanks.

Hi,
As per the following link
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/rel_notes/9_1_1/CUCM_BK_R6F8DBD4_00_release-notes-for-cucm-91/CUCM_BK_R6F8DBD4_00_release-notes-for-cucm-91_chapter_011.html
You will not be able to switch to the previous version after the COP file is installed. For example, if you are upgrading from Cisco Unified Communications Manager 9.0(1) to Cisco Unified Communications Manager 9.1(1) and the previous version is Cisco Unified Communications Manager 8.6, the COP file clears the space by removing the 8.6 version data that resides in the common partition. So after you apply the COP file, you will not be able to switch to the 8.6 version."
Additionally, regarding the first option, if you do not want to reduce the tracing levels you can still delete some old traces using RTMT which gives you an option of deleting the traces from the server as well as transferring / downloading them to your pc simultaneously by checking the 'delete from server' option on last page of log file collection option.
HTH
Manish

Encounter a problem during upgrade sap r/3 4.7 to ecc6

Hi expert:
i encounter a problem during upgrade sap r/3 4.7 to ecc6
in START_SHDI_FIRST step.
here is the error msg~
MSSCRESPDEFN.LOG
Msg 2812, Level 16, State 62, Server Jack, Line 6
Could not find stored procedure 'dbo.sap_upg_getrelease'.
setuser
i checked MS SQL DB and found out that i only got 'erp.sap_upg_getrelease' but not dbo owner.
can any one tell me how to solve this problem?~
thanks.
Regards
Jack Lee

It's the kernel for the shadow the correct?.
Regards,
Alfredo.

MAIN_SHDRUN/ACT_UPG ends during upgrade

During upgrade from CRM 6.0 to 7.0 EHP1 MAIN_SHDRUN/ACT_UPG phase ends.
In ACTUPG.ELG file I see:
******* LIST OF ERRORS AND RETURN CODES *******
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPACCI702.CRT
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1EEDO519X"Table" "CRMST_QUERY_OPP_BTIL" could not be activated
1 ETP111 exit code
I read SAPACCI702.CRT:
3 DDT012XAktiviere Tabelle "CRMST_QUERY_OPP_BTIL"
3 DDT402 Append-Struktur "ZCRMST_QUERY_OPP_BTIL" an Tabelle "CRMST_QUERY_OPP_BTIL" angefügt
2WDDT191 Erweiterungskat. "3" möglich, aber Include oder Subtyp ist noch unklassif.
1EDDT963 Feld "PROD_HIERARCHY" in Tabelle "CRMST_QUERY_OPP_BTIL" ist doppelt (Bitte überprüfen)
3 DDT013 Tabelle "CRMST_QUERY_OPP_BTIL" wurde nicht aktiviert
3 DDT014XAktiviere abhängige Tabelle "CRMST_QUERY_OPP_BTIL"
3 DDT402 Append-Struktur "ZCRMST_QUERY_OPP_BTIL" an Tabelle "CRMST_QUERY_OPP_BTIL" angefügt
2WDDT191 Erweiterungskat. "3" möglich, aber Include oder Subtyp ist noch unklassif.
3 DDT038 Aktivierung abhängige Tabelle "CRMST_QUERY_OPP_BTIL" erfolgreich
Oh... in german language... it's a problem for me. How can I check this structure? how?
Have you got any suggest?
Regards.

Hi Ganimede,
i have the similar kind of error can you please explain the steps for deleting the entry you have specified...
would be greate if you coulkd reply earliest
Thanks and Regards
Amar Ghuge

How to track changes made to the standard objects by SAP during upgrade ?

Hi All,
Can any one of you please let me know if there is any straight forward method to find any change made to the standard objects by SAP in different versions ?
Like for eg, during upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0.
Thanks in advance.

> For eg , if SAP has made any change in the standard transaction IE02, in ECC 6.0 how will we come to know those changes?
There are two sources for that:
The "Solution Browser" (http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/) which lists the differences between source and destination release and the release notes (http://service.sap.com/releasenotes). You'd need to read here all those from 4.6 to ERP 6.0 (so 4.7, ECC 5.0 and ERP 6.0) to find out the behaviour changes.
Markus

Can we activate Classic General Ledger in ECC6.0 during upgrade from 4.6C

Dear SAP Gurus,
Greetings
My Client's technical team had upgraded their system from 4.6C to ECC6.0 and they had activated classic GL instead of New GL. And they had also activated classic withholding tax in place of Extended Withholding tax.
They are facing some error during posting of transactions (like generation of excise invoices, posting of WHT transactions, etc.) I told that it can be a reason of not activating New GL.
Is my understanding correct...?? Can we activate classic GL during upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6.0...??
In case of a new client built (with ECC6.0), can we activate the classic GL instead of the New GL..??
Does the system will work correctly in the long run if they had activated classic GL and classic WHT...??
Please clarify. Thanks in advance for your time and efforts
Regards,
Chaps
P.S. Points will be awarded for answers !!

Hi,
I think that you should read long text of OSS note 999614 carfully and you are
aware of the fact that you will have additional migration efforts in
case you need to migrate to new G/L later on.
In case you are convinced that this is the best way please feel free
to deactivate new G/L as described in note 999614.
Please make sure that you deactivate new G/L in all clients of your
new system in case there were already client copies done.
Yes this is possible and I would not automatically assume that
error during posting of transactions are due to New GL not being activated.
Note 756146 documents the issue and possible repercussions
of using Classic GL.
In the case of a new installation the new G/L accounting
is active by default in ERP. In principle, the use
of the classic GL is also possible for new customers, however,
SAP does not recommend it since this requires an additional
migration expense in later years.
Regards,
Aidan

My iPad was disconnected during upgrade. I've tried restoring and resetting. I just did an iPad erase in "find my iphone" and it still shows the itunes logo and the fire-wire cable on the screen with an arrow. It's currently plugged into my computer.

My iPad was disconnected during upgrade. I've tried restoring and resetting. I just did an iPad erase in "find my iphone" and it still shows the itunes logo and the fire-wire cable on the screen with an arrow. It's currently plugged into my computer. How do I remedy this?

Unable to update or restore
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1808?viewlocale=en_US

Behaviour of ztables during upgrade

Hi all
I am trying to rationalise our ztables and would like to change the Delivery Class of some of our tables from 'W' to 'C' so that data can be transported through our landscape rather than manually entered on each system.
I've read the SAP help on the Delivery Class and note that the behaviour during Upgrade differs between 'W' and 'C'...:
<b>Client Dependant</b>
Class A and C: Data is only imported into client 000. Existing data records are overwritten.
Class E, S and W: Data is imported into all clients. Existing data records are overwritten.
<b>Client Independant</b>
Classes A, L and C: No data is imported.
Classes E, S, and W: Data is imported. Existing data records with the same key are overwritten.
...but I don't really understand what it means in practice. Is anybody able to explain to me what data is being imported and what the relevance of Client 000 is in this particular instance?
Please don't just copy the SAP help as I have already read it!!!
Thanks
Andy

Hi Andrew,
I can tell you something from what I have observed.
When we give class A the changes need to be done by us in all systems individualy.
When Class C, it asks for a transport and we can have same value transported
In this context client 000 is nothing but the client which you are using.So this would mean with A and C data is only in that client where you are using it or updating it.
So for other client you need to either make data manually as in case of A or in case of C you need to import the Transport.
From this behaviour it seems that for Class E,S and W the data that is being created in one client get's copied to other clients too on that system so it is like a system wide change in the data.
Hope this helps in getting some idea.
Regards
Nishant

More than 100 Mb space in tablespace but keeps having ORA-1653 unable to ex

Platform AIX 6.1
Oracle version 10.2.0.5.3
JOB_DET is a single table in one tablespace D_LGA1. It's space taken is 12096 Mb, the tablespace is capped at 12288 Mb, so technically it has 191 Mb free space.
13:06:55 SQL> select segment_name,tablespace_name,bytes/1024/1024 as mbytes
13:07:13   2 from dba_segments where segment_name='JOB_DET';
SEGMENT_NAME    TABLESPACE_NAME     MBYTES
JOB_DET         D_LGA1               12096
13:08:00 SQL> select tablespace_name, sum(bytes/1024/1024) as sum_mb,
sum(maxbytes/1024/1024) as sum_maxbytes_mb, AUTOEXTENSIBLE
from dba_data_files
where tablespace_name in ('D_LGA1') group by tablespace_name, autoextensible order by 1;
TABLESPACE_NAME     SUM_MB SUM_MAXBYTES_MB AUTOEXTEN
D_LGA1               12288           12288 YES
13:08:16 SQL> select tablespace_name, sum(bytes/1024/1024) as sum_free_mb
13:08:25   2 from dba_free_space where tablespace_name in ('D_LGA1')
13:08:32   3 group by tablespace_name order by 1;
TABLESPACE_NAME SUM_FREE_MB
D_LGA1             191.8125however I keep getting ORA-1653 in the alert log.
Thu Mar 08 13:09:54 TAIST 2012
ORA-1653: unable to extend table ADMIN.JOB_DET     by 128 in   tablespace D_LGA1
ORA-1653: unable to extend table ADMIN.JOB_DET     by 8192 in   tablespace D_LGA1
...OK, this is weird, but nevertheless, I added another datafile, which allows it to extend the size.
After which, the size of the segment JOB_DET is 12160 Mb, which was lesser than the original max size!! There doesnt seem to be any fragmentation going on there. I'm puzzled. Someone able to explain?
14:42:26 SQL> select segment_name,tablespace_name,bytes/1024/1024 as mbytes
14:42:28   2 from dba_segments where segment_name='JOB_DET';
SEGMENT_NAME    TABLESPACE_NAME     MBYTES
JOB_DET         D_LGA1               12160Edited by: len on Mar 8, 2012 3:05 PM

Hi sybrand,
would this help?
SQL> select * from dba_tables where table_name='JOB_DET';
OWNER      TABLE_NAME   TABLESPACE_NAME CLUSTER_NAME    IOT_NAME        STATUS     PCT_FREE   PCT_USED INI_TRANS
MAX_TRANS INITIAL_EXTENT NEXT_EXTENT MIN_EXTENTS MAX_EXTENTS PCT_INCREASE FREELISTS FREELIST_GROUP
    BLOCKS EMPTY_BLOCKS AVG_SPACE CHAIN_CNT AVG_ROW_LEN AVG_SPACE_FREELIST_BLOCKS NUM_FREELIST_BLO
DEGREE                         INSTANCES                      CACHE           TABLE_LO SAMPLE_SIZE LAST_ANAL PAR
IOT_TYPE     T S NES BUFFER_ ROW_MOVE GLO USE DURATION        SKIP_COR MON CLUSTER_OWNER                  DEPENDEN
COMPRESS DRO
ADMIN       JOB_DET      D_LG06                                          VALID             5                     2
       255          65536     1048576           1 2147483645                                         YES N   51475345
   1531830            0          0          0         158                         0                   0
         1                              1                         N           ENABLED     51475345 10-FEB-12 NO
             N N NO DEFAULT DISABLED YES NO                  DISABLED YES                                DISABLED
DISABLED NO
SQL> select * from dba_free_space where tablespace_name='D_LGA1';
TABLESPACE_NAME    FILE_ID   BLOCK_ID      BYTES     BLOCKS RELATIVE_FNO
D_LGA1                  28     516100   67043328       8184           28
D_LGA1                  36     516105   67043328       8184           36
D_LGA1                  75       8201   37814272       4616           75
D_LGA1                 119     516105   67043328       8184          119
SQL> select * from dba_tablespaces where tablespace_name='D_LGA1';
TABLESPACE_NAME BLOCK_SIZE INITIAL_EXTENT NEXT_EXTENT MIN_EXTENTS MAX_EXTENTS PCT_INCREASE MIN_EXTLE
CONTENTS LOGGING   FOR EXTENT_MAN ALLOCATIO PLU SEGMEN DEF_TAB_ RETENTION   BIG
D_LGA1                8192          65536                       1 2147483645                   65536 ONLINE
PERMANENT LOGGING   NO LOCAL      SYSTEM    NO AUTO   DISABLED NOT APPLY   NOEach data file has roughly 64 Mb free space in them, the only way I can think it would result in ORA-1653 is if what the application was trying to insert/update far exceeds 64 Mb at one go?
This is my assumption, or am I out of the box already?

ORA-1653 during upgrade db

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for