ORA-33156:Positions greater than 2**63 in a dimension map cant be referencd

AWM 11.2.0.1.0A
I am trying to view the data from a cube from AWM. (my cube --> cube view --> data).
The above error occurs which I have mentioned in the subject column.
The cube is a sales cube with dimensions (Date, item, channel, transaction type, customer, salesperson, sales location).
Each of these dimensions have multiple hierarchies.

I remember seeing this error before when cube has many dimensions and if it is not created as "SPARSE" we get below error. Is your cube compressed / uncompressed? . If possible make your cube as sparse then it reduces number of cells need to be referenced.

Similar Messages

Getting ORA-01401for NVARCHAR2 greater than 1000 chars.

I have a table with column PATTERN NVARCHAR2(1024). When I try to insert 1024 chars I get an error -
INSERT INTO test VALUES('AAA..1024times')
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column
but
INSERT INTO test VALUES(N'AAA..1024times') works. I can insert a string upto 1000 chars without using N'' . I would like to know why this happens and when to use N'' and when not. Is it safe to use N'' even if column is varchar2 and not nvarchar2 ?
I have following database settings-
PARAMETER VALUE
NLS_LANGUAGE AMERICAN
NLS_TERRITORY AMERICA
NLS_CURRENCY $
NLS_ISO_CURRENCY AMERICA
NLS_NUMERIC_CHARACTERS .,
NLS_CHARACTERSET AL32UTF8
NLS_CALENDAR GREGORIAN
NLS_DATE_FORMAT DD-MON-RR
NLS_DATE_LANGUAGE AMERICAN
NLS_SORT BINARY
NLS_TIME_FORMAT HH.MI.SSXFF AM
NLS_TIMESTAMP_FORMAT DD-MON-RR HH.MI.SSXFF AM
NLS_TIME_TZ_FORMAT HH.MI.SSXFF AM TZR
NLS_TIMESTAMP_TZ_FORMAT DD-MON-RR HH.MI.SSXFF AM TZR
NLS_DUAL_CURRENCY $
NLS_COMP BINARY
NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS BYTE
NLS_NCHAR_CONV_EXCP FALSE
NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET AL16UTF16
NLS_RDBMS_VERSION 10.1.0.2.0

Try this (not tested):
import oracle.sql.CharacterSet;
CharacterSet csDB=CharacterSet.make(CharacterSet.ZHS32GB18030);
int byteLenDB = csDB.convert("your string").length;
Note, ZHS32GB18030 is currently supported as the client character set only. You should better not define a database with this character set. (See: Database Globalization Support Guide, Table A-9). It looks like we have to clarify this, because DBCA lists ZHS32GB18030 and CREATE DATABASE accepts it.
The DB character set does not seem to be available through any public API (though it is retrieved and stored internally). You have to query the database.
-- Sergiusz

ORA-33156

I have a fact table with 482,000 records, it is monthly aggregated data in the fact table. The data is pre-aggregated across 8 dimensions with the following characteristics
D01 55 rows 54 used in fact table
D02 110 rows 63 used in fact table
D05 2230 rows 1646 used in fact table
D04 14291 rowa 10532 used in fact table
D05 53 rows 48 used in fact table
D06 527 rows 397 used in fact table
D07 33 rows 28 used in fact table
D08 21 rows 15 used in fact table
I have created an AW cube using time<d04 d03 d06 d02 d01 d05 d07 d08>
whenever I go to query the OLAP view I get
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-33156: Positions greater than 2**63 in a dimension map cannot be
referenced.
Can anyone shed some light on what I did wrong?

Zacky - its just a guess that this is a problem - but the exact same thing used to happen with Express, so I'm guessing its the same.
There are really only two solutions to this:
1) Define cubes that have less dimensions!
2) Split "dimension values" into separate cubes. I.e. if one of your dimensions is SCENARIO and has values like "Actuals","Budget" etc you can break out an actuals cube, budget cube, etc. Also this is sometimes done on time...i.e. have a separate 1999 cube, 2000 cube, etc.
For #1, I've found oftentimes that end users will request a ton of dimensions...which no one would ever use together. I.e. maybe the tax accounting group cares which GL account something was booked to but could care less about who the salesperson was, maybe a product line manager cares how their products are selling overall without the details of who sold it (or in what store), etc.
If this is the case, it is almost always better to split the cubes up into groups of dimensions that would naturally be used together (end users like this better also - they don't have to keep picking "All" for the dimensions they don't care about...)
Last and not least, one other common problem I've seen is using dimensions improperly, especially to capture "attribute" data. For example, once I saw a cube defined with the dimensions:
Product
Color
Packaging
but color and packaging were really just attributes of Product.
This can be pretty subjective, but if you post what your actual dimensions are we may be able to help out.
Scott
p.s. but in some cases, it is difficult to avoid having tons of dimensions - usually in customer demographics or risk scoring modules, in which case you might be out of luck.

ORA-00162: external dbid length 117 is greater than maximum(16)

A .net user facing this oracle issue any body plz identify the soution it will be very big help.This is the error.
ORA-00162: external dbid length 117 is greater than maximum(16)

Hello,
What's your Database name? Can you post content of your tnsnames.ora file?
Here is an example of tnsnames.ora
MYDB =
(DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST =192.168.1.100)(PORT = 1521))
    (CONNECT_DATA =
      (SERVER = dedicated)
      (SERVICE_NAME = MYDB)
)Regards
OrionNet

Query to select values greater than, where AS clause is used

Oracle 10g
Requesting your help in writing the query correctly.
I have the following 2 tables. The AddProjectPhase and AddProject tables. It is many to many relationship. Each project can have a predefined set of 4 different phases under it. Each phase has a start date and an end date. I am writing a report to get the phases which have a duration greater than, for example, 3 months.
The query below is working fine to just display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase. I am not able to modify it to select the phases which have a duration, for example, 3 or more months.
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECT"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJNAME" VARCHAR2(60),
     "PROJSTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PROJSTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDDATE" DATE,
     "PROJENDTYPE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDREASON" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "UCPROJECTMANAGER" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PARENTPROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_B36" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJID", "PROJHIDDENDATE") ENABLE
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECTPHASE"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJPHASEID" NUMBER(9,0),
     "PHASESTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PHASEENDDATE" DATE,
     "RRDATE" DATE,
     "PHASENAME" VARCHAR2(30),
     "PROJPHASESTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "REVIEWCOMMENTS" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "ISUEVALUATION" NUMBER(1,0),
     "SOLUTIONINGTEAMINVOLVEMENT" NUMBER(1,0),
     "ISUNAME" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_A63" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJPHASEID") ENABLE
   )Below is the query to display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase which is working fine.
SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename",
pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate",
pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate",
pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus",
ap.projID "projID",
ap.projName "projName",
ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate",
ap.projStartDate "projStartDate",
CASE
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    ELSE null
END "phaseMonths"
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
ORDER BY ap.projIDHowever the modified query shown below to select all the phases greater than, for example, 3 months, is resulting in
ORA-00904: "PHASEMONTHS": invalid identifier SELECT pp.phaseName, pp.phaseStartDate, pp.phaseEndDate
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
AND PhaseMonths IN
(SELECT
(CASE
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
ELSE null
END) AS PhaseMonths
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate)
ORDER BY ap.projID

Looking for this?
select *
   from (
        SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename"
          , pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate"
          , pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate"
          , pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus"
          , ap.projID "projID"
          , ap.projName "projName"
          , ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate"
          , ap.projStartDate "projStartDate"
          , CASE WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL     THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 ELSE null
            END "phaseMonths"
          FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
         WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
           AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
         ORDER
            BY ap.projID
where "phaseMonths" >= 3

Parse an XML of size greater than 64k using DOM

Hi,
I had a question regarding limitation of parsing a file of size greater than 64k in Oracle 10g. Is the error "ORA-31167: XML nodes over 64K in size cannot be inserted" related to this ?
One of the developers was telling that if we load an XML document of size greater than 64k into Oracle DOM, it will fail. Is 64k the size of the file or the size of text node in the XML?
Is there a way we can overcome this limitation?
I believe that Oracle 11g R1 documentation states that existing 64k limitation on the size of a text node has been eliminated. So if we use Oracle 11g, does it mean we can load XML files of size greater than 64K (or XML having text nodes of size greater than 64k)
I am not well versed with XML. Please help me out.
Thanks for your help.

Search this forum for the ORA-error.
Among others it will show the following: Node size
In this case I think we can assured that "a future release" in 2006 was 11.1 as mentioned by Mark (= Sr Product Manager Oracle XML DB)

Bytes is greater than maxbytes in dba_data_files

Hi,
In what situation can the size of bytes be greater than the size of maxbytes in the dba_data_files?
select bytes,user_bytes,maxbytes from dba_data_files where bytes > maxbytes
BYTES     USER_BYTES     MAXBYTES
10485760000     10485694464     6392119296
6291456000     6288310272     5242880000
6291456000     6291390464     5242880000
6291456000     6291390464     5242880000
10485760000     10485628928     7340032000
33554432000     33552334848     0
15728640000     15725494272     12582912000
35357982720     35347496960     32212254720
11534336000     11523850240     5242880000
11534336000     11532238848     10485760000
Regards,
CT

It's just mixing methods. Example follows.
SQL> create tablespace bytes datafile 'bytes01.dbf' size 128K
autoextend on maxsize 1000K;
Tablespace created.
SQL> select bytes/1024 kb, maxbytes/1024 maxkb, autoextensible
2 from dba_data_files where tablespace_name='BYTES';
        KB      MAXKB AUT
       128       1000 YES
SQL> create table dump (a varchar(4000)) tablespace bytes;
Table created.
SQL> insert into dump values ... ;
1 row created.
SQL> insert into dump select a from dump;
SQL> /
32 rows created.
SQL> select bytes/1024 kb, maxbytes/1024 maxkb, autoextensible
2 from dba_data_files where tablespace_name='BYTES';
        KB      MAXKB AUT
       192       1000 YES
SQL> insert into dump select a from dump;
SQL> /
256 rows created.
SQL> /
insert into dump select a from dump
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01653: unable to extend table TESTING.DUMP by 8 in tablespace BYTES
SQL> select bytes/1024 kb, maxbytes/1024 maxkb, autoextensible
2 from dba_data_files where tablespace_name='BYTES';
        KB      MAXKB AUT
       960       1000 YES
SQL> alter database datafile 'bytes01.dbf' resize 1111K;
Database altered.
SQL> select bytes/1024 kb, maxbytes/1024 maxkb, autoextensible
2 from dba_data_files where tablespace_name='BYTES';
        KB      MAXKB AUT
      1112       1000 YES
SQL>Does this answer op's concern?

KQL query using "Greater Than" fails

I have developed a CSOM app that does a KQL query against several managed properties. One of these properties is numeric (mapped to RefinableDouble01), so I have a greater than (>) comparison in the query string:
     RefinableDouble01>41.12345
I developed the app in Office 365 and when I run the query there, it works fine (no errors).  However, when I run it to our internal SharePoint 2013 site, it fails with the error:
     "We didn't understand your search terms. Make sure they're using proper syntax."
As far as I can tell, the configuration of the internal site matches the Office 365 site.
If I use a query on a text property, so that I don't use the greater than comparison, that query works. The query results from that query also show that the managed property RefinableDouble01 is properly mapped and returns the expected numeric value.
Does anyone know what the problem is? I'm wondering if the KQL query functionality is not properly set up in our internal site, but that is not an area that I am familiar with.
Bob Feldman

Here is more information, from the ULS Log file, regarding the error:
06/27/2014 11:05:13.47 NodeRunnerQuery1-d8a6a564-7b37- (0x0BA4) 0x0DC4 Search                        Query Processing
aizc0 High    Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.Ims.ImsQueryInternal : New request: Query text 'RefinableDouble01>41.12345', Query template ''; HiddenConstraints: ; SiteSubscriptionId: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 fa039f9c-0884-60df-c11a-64f9b09837c4
06/27/2014 11:05:13.48 NodeRunnerQuery1-d8a6a564-7b37- (0x0BA4) 0x0DC4 Search                        Query Processing
aizgn Medium Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.Pipeline.Executors.QueryPipelineHardWiredFlowExecutor : (FlowExecutor)eventSearchFlowDone: d8a6a564-7b37-4815-a35f-f97acc0d6cba, RefinableDouble01>41.12345, Microsoft.ProductivitySearchFlow,
0, SPWFEAPP, Error=Exception occurred due to some other exception fa039f9c-0884-60df-c11a-64f9b09837c4 fa039f9c-0884-60df-c11a-64f9b09837c4
06/27/2014 11:05:13.48 NodeRunner.exe (0x0BA4)                 0x0DC4 SharePoint Server Search      Query
aisyt High    ExecuteFlowInternal FlowExecutor:Microsoft.ProductivitySearchFlow Exception: Microsoft.Ceres.Evaluation.DataModel.CommonEvaluationException: Exception occurred due to some other exception ---> Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.QueryMalformedException:
Query 'RefinableDouble01>41.12345' failed: syntax error at position 0, The operation is illegal for the given property, property expression: RefinableDouble01>41.8882213637562     --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.Pipeline.Processing.KeywordQueryParserEvaluator.KeywordQueryParserProducer.ParseKeywordQuery(String queryText, ParsingContext parsingContext, Boolean debugMode, String& searchTerms)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.Pipeline.Processing.KeywordQueryParserEvalua... fa039f9c-0884-60df-c11a-64f9b09837c4
06/27/2014 11:05:13.48 w3wp.exe (0x196C)                       0x41B0 SharePoint Server Search      Query
dk68 High    SearchServiceApplication::Execute--Exception: Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Query.QueryMalformedException: We didn't understand your search terms. Make sure they're using proper syntax. ---> System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.SearchServiceApplicationFault]:
Query 'RefinableDouble01>41.12345' failed: syntax error at position 0, The operation is illegal for the given property, property expression: RefinableDouble01>41.8882213637562    Server stack trace:      at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.HandleReply(ProxyOperationRuntime
operation, ProxyRpc& rpc)     at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.Call(String action, Boolean oneway, ProxyOperationRuntime operation, Object[] ins, Object[] outs, TimeSpan timeout)     at ... fa039f9c-0884-60df-c11a-64f9b09837c4

Trying To Insert XML String Greater Than 4000 Characters in PHP Fails

Dear Sir,
Subject:-Trying To Insert XML String Greater Than 4000 Characters in PHP Fails ORA-01704.
In an attempt to design web app in PHP and inserting data into "CLOB" field of "articles" table associated with it, returning ORA-01704: string literal too long error.
Platform: OEL5
Database 11g(11.0.7.0)
php : 5.2
I refer to oracle document ID: [ID 336888.1] it is asking to contact support.
Please help us in this regards.
Many Thanks,
mkyazdani

Hi,
I appreciate you, yes it is similar i have referred that manual and also inform to our php developer about the changes we need to make in our php script.
Regards,
mkyazdani

ORA-06502 and ORA-06503 if more than 3700 rows

In a simple application one of the two tables has about 10.000 rows. If I limit the "Max Row Count" to 3700 the "select list" will be generated without error
("row(s) 1-17 of more than 3700").
With "Max Row Count" 3710 and 3720 an ORA-06502, with "Max Row Count" 3730 an ORA-06503 occur and no select list will appear.
Other values greater 3710 e.g. 4000 don't cause any Oracle error but no select list was built.
It seems to be that the value limit will be exeeded in cases where the row count is greater than 3700.

Joachim,
Select lists are limited to 32,000 characters. This includes the select and option tags and all the display and return values. Depending on your pagination settings, specifically on the number of rows you display on each page, this translates into around 4000 rows being supported by this particular pagination style. If you have more rows then that, I'd recommend using a different pagination style, one that does not show a select list.
Regards,
Marc

Minimum in range greater than zero

I'm trying to find the minimum number in a row but I want to find a number greater than zero as the minimum not the zeros .

Badunit's remark that "Your numbers must all be >=0" led me to check all three suggestions against this possiblity. Here are the results for two data sets, one containing text, blank and negative values, the second containing only positve numbers, zero, and a blank cell.
As you can see, my procedure includes both positive and negative values, and eliminates only the zeros from contention. If your data will include negative values, and you do NOT wish to include them, they may be easily stripped from the data when it is transfered the the Aux column, in the same manner as the zeroes have been.
Stripping all values less than or equal to zero requies a minor edit of the formula in the AUX column:
Original: =IF(B=0,"",B)
Revised: =IF(B<=0,"",B)
Jerry's formula requires that it be placed into a Footer row (or a Header row) IF it is to be placed on the Data table and to use the table name ("Data") as the first argument for INDEX. INDEX ignores Header and Footer rows in arguments specifying a whole column (or a whole table).
As can be seen in column B, this formula will be thrown off (as BU has warned) by the inclusion of negative values. A revision similar to the one shown in my formula above will remove the requirement to not include negative values:
Original: =SMALL(B,COUNTIF(B,0)+1)
Revised: =SMALL(B,COUNTIF(B,"<=0")+1)
As revised, the formula will return the smallest positive value in the data list.
Badunit's formula will also show a warning triangle if there is an empty cell or a cell containing text in the data list. Annoying, but it does not affect the results. The warning is that "The formula refers to cells without numbers,"
Regards,
Barry

How to find login times greater than 24 hours from custom table.

Hello Guru's,
I am having trouble approaching how to construct a query that will find who has been logged in for more than 24 hours, this table is updated every few hours to show who's logged in and where- I am attempting to find out if someone has been logged in for more than 24 hours- if so, who and where. This is difficult for me because I need to compare each recorded for each user login and then see if the next entry is greater than 24 hours from the previous entry.
A table holds the login times and locations as table position_hist:
position_id,userid,upd_date.
Something like;
select position_id,userid,upd_date from position_hist where (select upd_date from position_hist where "the next entry for that user and that position is greater than 24 hours?????"
I guess the easier way to look at it is for a given position_id who has been logged in for more than 24 hours in one go.
Any advice would be brilliant :-)

It's hard without knowing your Oracle version, or having any sample data to work with. Please post that in the future using \ tags and DDL/DML.
Here is what I came up with as a guess:SQL> WITH POSITION_HIST AS
2 (
3 SELECT 1 AS POSITION_ID, 1 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE) AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
4 SELECT 1 AS POSITION_ID, 1 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE)+1 AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
5 SELECT 1 AS POSITION_ID, 1 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE)+2 AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
6 SELECT 1 AS POSITION_ID, 1 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE)+4 AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
7 SELECT 3 AS POSITION_ID, 2 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE) AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
8 SELECT 3 AS POSITION_ID, 2 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE)+1 AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
9 SELECT 3 AS POSITION_ID, 2 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE)+2 AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL UNION ALL
10 SELECT 4 AS POSITION_ID, 21 AS USER_ID, TRUNC(SYSDATE)+2 AS UPD_DATE FROM DUAL
11 )
12 SELECT POSITION_ID
13 , USER_ID
14 FROM
15 (
16 SELECT POSITION_ID
17 , USER_ID
18 , UPD_DATE - LAG(UPD_DATE) OVER (PARTITION BY USER_ID ORDER BY UPD_DATE) AS LOGGED_IN_TIME
19 , ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY USER_ID ORDER BY UPD_DATE DESC) RN
20 FROM POSITION_HIST
21 )
22 WHERE LOGGED_IN_TIME > 1 AND RN = 1
23 /
POSITION_ID USER_ID
1 1

How to zero the values that are greater than 0 at time 0?

Hello, New user,
I would like to know how to zero values that are greater than 0 at time 0. I am totalizing gas flow and understand how not to add the negative numbers but am unsure about the positive numbers at 0 flow. I hope I have explained this good enough.
Thank you,
Lisa

I don't understand why the value which should be 0 is actually greater than 0.
How do you determine that the value should be 0, such as no flow, even if the value is greater than 0?
Ryan Shi
Hello Ryan,
The system itself may have an offset of 0.1 V which in the program is related to flow. I do not wish to add this .1 as flow. I want to beable to reset the values to 0 and then when there is flow, to add the flow. If you purchase a program from some vendors you can zero the channel, that is my goal. I want this to be automatic when a switch is pressed. Such as: for 20 seconds, average channel, and use that value as 0 flow then add flow?? I was told averaging may work??
Thank you again,
Lisa Williamson

'job_queue_processes' must be greater than or equal 1

Hello,
I am trying to install Oracle 10g on Windows 7 but at the end it displays following error:
Enterprise Manager Configuration Failed due to the following error:
'job_queue_processes' must be greater than or equal 1. Fix the error(s) and run EM configuration assistant again in standard mode.......[b]
Best regards

Windows 7 Home Basic and Oracle 10.1.0
Mar 31, 2011 8:25:30 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setConsoleLogging
CONFIG: consoleLogging value set to: true
Mar 31, 2011 8:25:31 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setUpdateEMDEmail
CONFIG: updateEMDEmail value set to: false
Mar 31, 2011 8:25:31 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setAutomaticBackup
CONFIG: automaticBackup value set to: false
Mar 31, 2011 8:25:31 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setSkipRepos
CONFIG: skipRepos value set to: true
Mar 31, 2011 8:25:31 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig perform
CONFIG: Passed parameter check
Mar 31, 2011 8:25:31 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig initSQLEngine
CONFIG: SQLEngine connecting with SID: orcl, oracleHome: c:\oracle\product\10.1.0\db_1, and user: SYS
Mar 31, 2011 8:25:31 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig initSQLEngine
CONFIG: ORA-12546: TNS:permission denied
oracle.sysman.assistants.util.sqlEngine.SQLFatalErrorException: ORA-12546: TNS:permission denied
     at oracle.sysman.assistants.util.sqlEngine.SQLEngine.executeImpl(SQLEngine.java:1403)
     at oracle.sysman.assistants.util.sqlEngine.SQLEngine.connect(SQLEngine.java:762)
     at oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig.initSQLEngine(EMConfig.java:5451)
     at oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig.checkConfiguration(EMConfig.java:966)
     at oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig.perform(EMConfig.java:251)
     at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbca.backend.EMConfiguration.run(EMConfiguration.java:305)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Mar 31, 2011 8:25:31 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig checkConfiguration
CONFIG: null
java.lang.NullPointerException
     at oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig.checkConfiguration(EMConfig.java:994)
     at oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig.perform(EMConfig.java:251)
     at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbca.backend.EMConfiguration.run(EMConfiguration.java:305)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Mar 31, 2011 8:25:31 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig checkConfiguration
WARNING: 'shared_pool_size' must be greater than or equal to 80 MB.
Mar 31, 2011 8:25:31 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig checkConfiguration
CONFIG: null
java.lang.NullPointerException
     at oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig.checkConfiguration(EMConfig.java:1023)
     at oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig.perform(EMConfig.java:251)
     at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbca.backend.EMConfiguration.run(EMConfiguration.java:305)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Mar 31, 2011 8:25:31 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig checkConfiguration
SEVERE: 'job_queue_processes' must be greater than or equal to 1. Fix the error(s) and run EM Configuration Assistant again in standalone mode.
Mar 31, 2011 8:25:47 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig finalize
CONFIG: finalize() called for EMConfig
Mar 31, 2011 10:52:05 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setConsoleLogging
CONFIG: consoleLogging value set to: true
Mar 31, 2011 10:52:05 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setUnlockAccounts
CONFIG: unlockAccounts value set to: true
Mar 31, 2011 10:52:05 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setIsClusterConfig
CONFIG: isClusterConfig value set to: false
Mar 31, 2011 10:52:05 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setSkipRepos
CONFIG: skipRepos value set to: false
Mar 31, 2011 10:52:05 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setUpdateEMDEmail
CONFIG: updateEMDEmail value set to: true
Mar 31, 2011 10:52:05 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setStoreReposVars
CONFIG: storeReposVars value set to: true
Mar 31, 2011 10:52:05 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setUsesASM
CONFIG: usesASM value set to: false
Mar 31, 2011 10:52:05 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setAutomaticBackup
CONFIG: automaticBackup value set to: false
Mar 31, 2011 10:52:05 PM oracle.sysman.emcp.EMConfig setIsCentralMode
CONFIG: isCentralMode value set to: falseThanks

How to use (greater than) in web services call

Hello, I am trying to query a set of assets where the external unique ID is greater than 400,000. My existing code looks like
qryIn.ListOfAsset(0).ExternalSystemId = ">'400000'"
However, using this will return any asset record starting with a 5 or above as far as I can tell, I assume b/c it is comparing string data due to the single quotes infering data of type text (string). Is it possible to use comparison operators with numeric data correctly?
I posed this question to support and received the below answer:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <soap:Body> <AssetWS_AssetQueryPage_Input xmlns="urn:crmondemand/ws/asset/"> <ListOfAsset xmlns="urn:/crmondemand/xml/asset"> <Asset> <AssetId /> <PurchaseDate/> <OwnerAccountId /> <ExternalSystemId>> '400000'</ExternalSystemId> </Asset> </ListOfAsset> </AssetWS_AssetQueryPage_Input> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope>
Basically, instructing me to use &gt. I'm doing coding in .NET visual studio and not using the XML as above. However, I did try the following:
qryIn.ListOfAsset(0).ExternalSystemId = ">'400000'" which returned an error in the compiler.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

Thanks for the reply. I would assume "external system id" is an integer, but, I will test on a custom field that I now is of type integer.
Could you take your same code and use a non-zero value for the operand? For example, could you try
objAccQryParam.ListOfAccount[0].CustomInteger0 = ">= '10'"; and let me know if that returns values that are greater than or equal to 10. Using a two digit number is important. Assuming you have data greater than 10.
Thanks!

ORA-33156:Positions greater than 2**63 in a dimension map cant be referencd

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for