Oracle 10.2.0.4 Update Patchs

Dear All,
I have Oracle 10g Release 2 Patch 4 (10.2.0.4) installed on Linux x86 and on Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition.
Now i wna to update both of them in to 10.2.0.4.4 and 10.2.0.4.5 in Linux and in windows too.
Can you help me which patch i should install for
1) *10.2.0.4.4* for Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition and for Linux x86.
2) *10.2.0.4.5* for Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition and for Linux x86.
Thanks
Adeel Imtiaz

Hi Adeel,
Please refer section *3.1.4 Oracle Database Patch Set Update (PSU)* in MOS tech note:
*Patch Set Update and Critical Patch Update April 2011 Availability Document [ID 1291877.1]*
10.2.0.4.4 Database PSU - Patch 9352164
10.2.0.5.3 Database PSU - Patch 11724962thanks,
X A H E E R

Similar Messages

Oracle 11g database can we update patch directly from 11.2.0.3.0 to 11.2.0.4.0?

Hi,
I have installed Oracle 11g database.
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.3.0 Production
TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
I want to update the patch.
Oracle 11g database can we update patch directly from 11.2.0.3.0 to 11.2.0.4.0?
Is any impact on the database?
Kindly suggest,
Regards,
Sachin

11.2.0.4 is nothing but a patchset of 11.2.0.3, in-place upgrade is allowed :
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e23633/preup.htm#UPGRD12370
"You cannot install the new software into the same location for Oracle home as your current release, unless you are installing an Oracle Database 11g patchset release. For a patchset release, you can use the same Oracle Database 11g Oracle home."
And since it's a patchset, a direct upgrade is ok.
Lastly, yes, every upgrade has an impact (e.g. perf.), it has to be tested.
Nicolas.

Oracle 9i updates / patches

Hi - our company has been developing our Client/Server application for Oracle (and SQL and Informix...) for years now. The last version of Oracle Database we developed for was 9i. The only problem is that apparently we do not have any of support agreement with Oracle and no longer can get patches for the software.
Is there any specific place that a development shop can get the critical Oracle 9i patches for without purchasing a whole end user copy of it? I couldn't find any way to get into MetaLink without spending $$.
I'm not looking to do anything illegal - just looking to see if there are any resources for developers to use to get these patches / updates.
Thanks in advance for info.

I don't believe you're going to be able to get Metalink access without paying some sort of fees, no.
As a development shop, you may (and I stress may here, I have not spent any time investigating the legalities here, nor do I speak for Oracle, nor am I a lawyer, sprinkle in disclaimers that should Oracle audit you, relying on advice from some guy on the internet is going to hold less than no weight, consult your own licensing experts/ lawyers/ tea leaves) be able to become an Oracle partner, which is something like a $1500 investment at the low end, which does get you Metalink account and the technical ability to download patches. Whether that is sufficiently from a legal standpoint, or what Oracle licenses you need in order to do your development in a fully licensed sort of fashion, however, is something you would have to investigate.
Justin

PSU update patch link

Hi,
While applying psu 11.1.0.7.2 on 11.1.0.7.1 i got this,
Following patches have conflicts. Please contact Oracle Support and get the merged patch of the patches :
8199107, 8833297, 7639602, 7111245, 7295298, 6972189
Do i raise SR requesting these patches. Or is there any direct link to get the merged patch of these.
Thanks,
Taher

Hi Taher
I just discovered another Metalink note which indicates that some patch conflicts can be ignored;
"Patch Set Updates - One-off Patch Conflict Resolution [ID 1061295.1]"
If this all gets too confusing then the best is to log an SR with a list of conflicts and let Oracle advise you further.
Regarding your new questions.
Q1). How can i confirm, i have 11.1.0.7.1. if i check the opatch lsinventory for 11.1.0.7.1 patch, it is showing in the list.
A1) It seems like this is a known problem. There is a discussion of this problem here;
http://jhdba.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/identifying-applied-psu-patches/#more-520
Apparently you can use this command (but not with 100% success);
SELECT * FROM registry$history;
You can also have a look at this note "How to confirm that a Critical Patch Update (CPU) has been installed in Linux / UNIX [ID 821263.1]".
This note says "To implement the CPU installation into each database associated to the ORACLE_HOME, the Post Installation steps must be executed as documented in the CPU README". So extra steps are required during the application of the CPU to update the registry$history.
Q2). In the document
Preparation Guidelines for an E-Business Suite Release 12.1.1 Upgrade [ID 761570.1]
Path E -> Section B, i have applied all the patches upto 8199107. All the patches afer this are for 11.1.0.7.0
But as i am in 11.1.0.7.1, can i still apply the remaining patches which are
8639653
8940108
9026927
9066130
9554727
9743057
A2). To be honest I am not sure what the answer to this question is. Maybe one of the other experts can answer this question.
Does opatch indicate if these patches are currently missing?
I would check with Oracle about this.
Regards
Frank

10.1.2 and 10.1.3 home critical update patches

Hi All,
DB:11.1.0.7
Oracle Apps:12.1.1
OS:Linux 86x64
Could anyone please share information on list of patches including pre-requisites for 10.1.2 and 10.1.3 home critical update patches.
Thanks for your time!
Regards,

Hi user;
Please check Oracle E-Business Suite Releases 11i and 12 Critical Patch Update Knowledge Document (April 2010) [ID 985896.1]
Also check:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/critical-patch-updates/cpuapr2010.html
Hope it helps
Regard
Helios

Updated Patches

Hi All,
Where can I download the updated patches for 9.3.1.(Windows)????
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks

Hi,
Metalink3 is where you can get them :- https://metalink3.oracle.com/od/faces/index.jspx
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Any Product update patches/ Bug fix reqired after R1213 up-grade ?

Hi
i have completed R1211 - R1213 Up-gradation. I have followed the Document Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1.3 Readme (Doc ID 1080973.1).
Is there any additional product update patches need to apply for any specific modules after up-gradation of R1213?. How to proceed this activity? if needs to update with latest product bug fix/patch. Below are the modules we are using Please help us in this.
gl
ap
ar
fa
ce
JA
po
inv
ONT
WIP
BOM
CST
MRP
OAM
XDO
Thanks
DBA

Please refer to the following links/docs:
Oracle Applications Current Patchset Comparison Utility - patchsets.sh [ID 139684.1]
EBS: R12.1 Oracle Financials Recommended Patch Collection (RPC) [ID 954704.1]
Identifying Recommended Patches for E-Business Suite Environments
https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/recommended_patches_for_oracle_e
Identifying the Latest Family Packs for Oracle E-Business Suite
https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/latest_available_packs_for_oracle
Thanks,
Hussein

Fresh install and update patch problems 119060-17 , 122213-10 , 122912-02

Just yesterday, i installed a fresh Solaris 10 x86 onto some pc hardware. After getting solaris installed and issues with my network card, i downloaded and installed the free version of the update manager 1.0.x. Next, i proceeded to update all the general patches for the solaris 10 system. I started with the command 'pprosvc -i' from a terminal. It then proceeded to download and validate a bunch of patches successfully until it hit the following 3 patches:
119060-17 ---- X11 6.6.2_x86: Xsun patch
122213-10 ---- GNOME 2.6.0_x86: GNOME Desktop Patch
122912-02 ---- SunOS 5.10_x86: Apache 1.3 Patch
All 3 failed some kind of validation and then crashed the pprosvc program, at which point it exited with the following error:
122912-02 cannot be validated
119060-17 cannot be validated
122912-02 cannot be validated
Unexpected Failure: java.lang.Throwable: ERROR: Failed to validate the digital signature(s).
I also tried to use the GUI Update Manager to update, hoping the problem was isolated to pprosvc, but that problem was also in the GUI with a similar error message:
Error occurred...The detailed error message is: Unexpected Failure: java.lang.Throwable: ERROR: Failed to validate the digitial signature(s)
Anyone know why Sun's update patch process is so troublesome?
Getting Tired of Solaris Updates...
I should mention that this is the free solaris 10 x86 install and i don't have a service contract with Sun. If this problem persists, i don't think i'll get one, as i see only further problems after buying one.
tired and confused

Hi,
There is an issue with this that is currently being investigated. There is another thread that may shed some light on what is happening here;
http://forum.sun.com/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=316
Thread title is : Sun UC, Digitally Signed Patches Using New Verisign Certificates
In the short-term please ensure that the patch mentioned in it is installed.
To quote part of mentioned thread above:
"Once the Sun Update Connection client software is upgraded with patch 121118-06 (SPARC) or 121119-06 (x86/x64) or later revisions normal behavior will resume. "
If this fails to resolve your problem, would you be kind enough to post the output of the following command for analysis please;
# showrev -p | egrep -e '121454|121119|120336|121082|121564|122232|119789'
Sincerely,
Moderator.
Message was edited by:
ForumModerator

Adobe Audition CS6 (5.0.2) update patch released

Hey Audition friends!
This morning we released an update patch for Adobe Audition CS6. This update, version 5.0.2 for Mac and Windows, fixes several bugs discovered after release that could not be fixed in time for the earlier patch, and cleans up a few odds and ends to ensure Audition is fully compatible for use on Windows 8. Briefly, here are the primary bug fixes:
Metronone may skip or stutter
Windows registry entry missing backslash in path
Eucon/Avid Artist control surface touchscreen: Control of Surround Panner does not work
Bounce to New Track > Selected Track: New track is now based on channelization of source track
Windows 8: Third-party drivers do not have a valid WHQL signature
CD Burning: Removed 78 minute limit from CD Layout.
Audition may crash on Mac when exporting to OMF
Audition may crash when attempting to bounce a track with a channelization that does not match the Master track
You may install the update by selecting Help > Updates… in Adobe Audition CS6 or through the Adobe Application Manager tool. Additionally, you may download the patch installer directly for Mac and Windows.

Since 5.02 is an update, not an upgrade (there's a technical difference under the hood) then you shouldn't need to rescan for VSTs or anything - the new executable will use the same settings files. However, I would suggest NOT updating in the middle of a project as a good rule of thumb. If you choose to, I might suggest backing up the existing application files or folder so you could easily restore if you chose to. There were no major changes introduced between 5.0 and 5.02 except for some bug fixes to improve stability, so you'll probably be safe, but unless you're running into one of the specific issues described, my recommendation would be to wait.
As for your second question, I don't know the answer to that. What happens when you attempt to perform a mixdown? There was some work done for the 6.0 release that would have reduced problems when trying to mixdown with UAD and other instance-limited plugins. If you enable Track Pre-Render for those tracks, by clicking the lightning bolt icon in the Effects Rack or the "fx" view in the track panel for those tracks, do you still experience a problem?

Reader 9.4.6 Deployment (Update Patch Order)

Just in case anyone has issues applying this update patch (Error 1334, etc.), the correct patch order (starting from full version 9.4.0) is:
→ 9.4.2 → 9.4.5 → 9.4.6
(See http://forums.adobe.com/message/3640440 for a more detailed synopsis on applying patches and instructions on creating batch files to do so).

Download Adobe Reader and Acrobat Cleaner Tool - Adobe Labs

Applying all update\patches during 'install software update' step

Hi,
I have created software update group (around 10 updates\patches) and deploy it to 'unknown computers' collection. Ts 'Install software update' step scans through and only installs 2 updates out of 10. I have kept deploy property as 'required' while publishing
on 'unknown computers' and 'install software update' has 'All Software update' selected (other option is mandatory update'). I want to have all the 10 required update to be installed . any idea what should be the settings on 'deploy' prperty for software group
that install all the updates in the group during 'install software update' step? Any pointers will be appreciated
Regards,

Hi,
Yes , they need a reboot and reboot is happening automatically. I believe, once reboot is done, other patches should take over with installation. I don't see any information for another updates that are part of same software group. For these 2 succefully
installed updates log has below that indicates they reboot and finish.
WUHandler has log:
1. Update (Missing): Security Update for Windows 7 for x64-based Systems (KB2862330) (35dcb297-873a-45af-bb19-e8b18aedd5bb, 202) WUAHandler 2/5/2014 8:09:02 AM 2760 (0x0AC8)
2. Update (Missing): Update for Windows 7 for x64-based Systems (KB2834140) (88152097-0294-4098-b27c-d2fd479e9831, 202) WUAHandler 2/5/2014 8:09:03 AM 2760 (0x0AC8)
Update 1 (35dcb297-873a-45af-bb19-e8b18aedd5bb) finished installing (0x00000000), Reboot Required? Yes WUAHandler 2/5/2014 8:09:06 AM 2348 (0x092C)
Update 2 (88152097-0294-4098-b27c-d2fd479e9831) finished installing (0x00000000), Reboot Required? Yes WUAHandler 2/5/2014 8:09:09 AM 356 (0x0164)
Update (35dcb297-873a-45af-bb19-e8b18aedd5bb) has finished the post reboot operation. HResult: 0x00000000. WUAHandler 2/5/2014 8:10:46 AM 2152 (0x0868)
Update (88152097-0294-4098-b27c-d2fd479e9831) has finished the post reboot operation. HResult: 0x00000000. WUAHandler 2/5/2014 8:10:46 AM 2152 (0x0868)
Any pointers to figure out the status of other patches\updats that are part of same group?
Regards,

OWB version does not change with Oracle database 11.1.0.7 patch

Hi,
This is Kumar and I have just completed applying Oracle database 11.1.0.7 patch (p6890831_111070_Linux-x86-64.zip) on top of Oracle 11.1.0.6 database on RedHat Linux machine. After successful installation, I have issues below statement to check the validity and version of the installed components.
select comp_name, version, status from dba_registry;
I could see all the component's version as 11.1.0.7 except OWB component's version which is still *11.1.0.6.0* and status is VALID
Could you please let me know what went wrong in my installation? or Is this behavior expected one?
Regards,
Kumar

Did you check with Patch inventory ?
You can run the OWB health check script (download from metalink) to the configuration.

Vat on purchase going wrong when we update patches

Dear experts,
we have update patches upto the latest, after update the patches, vat on purchase for all states going on account( default account assigned for transaction JP5 in OB40), instead of state wise vat gl account.
we have assigned the gl accounts for transaction JP5 in table J_1it030k_v for each business place wise(state wise).
but when we do the miro system picking default account from OB40, instead of assignment from table J_1it030k_v for the transaction JP5
please provide the solution.
useful answers duly rewarded.

For Given issue configure following steps
1. For JP5 currently you are maintaing for JP5 one dummy GL A/C without tax code reference.
2. Please click on rule key of screen and tick the Tax code which is maintained in tab accounts are determine based on .
3. Maintain dummy GL account in OB40 for transaction JP5 with all tax code maintained in table J1_IT030K_V
Regards
Pravin M
Mobile No. +91 9819461787

Agents not getting SCOM UR4 Update Patch

SCOM Agents were installed manually to 20 Domain Controllers but only 5 of them have SCOM UR4 Update Patch applied
I would like to know what may be the cause of this scenario?
Manage to patch the remaining DCs by running the KB2992020 for the SCOM Agent.

Hi Jay,
Refer to the below
https://cloudadministrator.wordpress.com/2014/05/10/system-center-2012-r2-operations-manager-ur2-does-not-updated-agents-trough-the-console/
Blog: http://theinfraguys.com
Follow me at Facebook
The Infra Guys Facebook Page
Join the Singapore System Center Admin Group
SG System Center Admin Group
Please remember to click Mark as Answer on the answer if it helps you in anyway

Can you force ARD to ask permission before control/observing *AND* still be able to push updates/patches?

Is there a way to force ARD to ask permission before observing/controling a computer AND still be able to push updates/patches to the computer?
I know we can't be the only ones who have this dilemma so I'm hoping someone has a solution.
ARD version 3.
OS 10.6.8 (ARD machine) and 10.6-10.7 client Macs
Each remotely monitored computer has an admin account that ARD uses to inventory and update the machines. Let's call it ADMIN. Of course each computer also has a local (non-admin) account let's call USER.
When USER is logged in, we'd like ARD to always ask permission before observing and/or controlling the computer. We found we can replicate this by removing the ADMIN login and password from the info tab of the computer in question as well as turning on the 'Any guest may request permission' setting. Unfortunately we found this also removes the ability of ARD to start a chat session with the computer - even with the chat option checked on in ARD settings (system preferences). To push updates/patches we have to put the ADMIN account information back into computer info tab.
Basically it boils down to giving the end user the privacy they would like (not being viewed without warning) while they're logged in vs. allowing the IT department to update the computers when necessary.
With the ADMIN login and password entered into the computer's info tab we're able to observe/control without warning. We changed the client settings for that computer via ARD to always request permission but this didn't work while the ADMIN login and password were still entered in the info tab. Once we removed the information we were prompted to ask permission but that's because we were essentially an unknown guest.
It appears to be an either/or situation right now. Either you give the user privacy and always ask permission or you give the IT department the rights to observe a machine and push updates. Because once we put the ADMIN information back into the info tab, we can observe without permission again.
When USER is logged in, always ask permission to control/observe. But still be able to push updates. If ADMIN is logged in or no one is logged in, don't ask to control/observe.
Has anyone found a workable solution for this question?

You can take a look at this website and it will give you the command to run that will control the Observe and Control options for the access mode.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2370
The command is:
$
sudo /System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/Resources/kickstart -configure -users "THIS IS WHERE YOU PUT THE USERS YOU WANT TO HAVE ACCESS" -access -on -privs -ControlObserve -ObserveOnly -TextMessages

Oracle 10.2.0.4 Update Patchs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for