ORDERS05 issue with segment E1EDK36

Hi,
I'm trying to update an existing order with payment card information. In order to do so, I fill the segment E1EDK36:
CCINS : valid payment card type
CCNUM : valid credit card number
EXDATBI : expiration date
For some reason however, the processing of the IDoc states that 'no data has changed'. In the partner profile I have chosen for process code 'ORDC'.
Do I need to fill any additional fields?

Do I need to fill any additional fields?
exactly i dont know .mightbe below fields are also mandatary and once you need to check idoc with abaper.
CCNAME Name of cardholder
FAKWR Maximum amount

Similar Messages

Graphical mapping issue with useOneAsMany if segment does not exist

Hi all
I have an issue with graphical mapping in an IDoc to file scenario. I need to have header level fields mapped to line item fields. Whether or not and how many source header segments of the same type exist depends on a qualifier (QUALF). This is generally working if I use the following graphical mapping:
if QUALF = 001 then <source> -> removeContext -> useOneAsMany -> splitByValue -> <target>
... with setting QUALF, <source>, and the second input for the useOneAsMany to the highest possible context node.
Nevertheless, if the segment with the qualifier 001 does not exist in the source then the mapping throws the error "Too few values in first queue in fuction useOneAsMany". Whatever I've tried, the mapping wants to execute the useOneAsMany statement anyway and I haven't found a way to omit this. Whether the target would be created with an empty value or not created at all would be secondary. Would eventually somebody have a solution to this problem?
Thanks in advance,
Daniel

Daniel,
try using mapWithDefault function before useAsmany
if QUALF = 001 then <source> -> removeContext -> <b>MapwithDefault</b>->useOneAsMany -> splitByValue -> <target>
I think it takes care even if the value occur in the contaxt or.
Babu

Issue with valuation segment and gl in MB5l

Hi gurus
I have an issue with a couple of materials in a report in MM MB5L list of stock values. The materials they are reporting with the issue have no costing screen extended in MM and I think this maybe the issue. The message I am getting is:
Account 121160 does not exist in company code 0010 G/L accnt is missing for val. segment 000005 1400.
I have checked the account and it does exist in the company code, is there any other config between the segment and gl account.
regards

The transaction is MB5L which is stock values balances. The message is:
Account 121160 does not exist in company code 0010
G/L accnt is missing for val. segment 000005 1400,
There is no message number, no question mark(help) to check the message number either, as it is just text at the bottom of the report showing the error.
I thought it might just be because the costing view was not setup, however not sure why the gl account is coming up as cannot see any postings to this account? It maybe that they have not done the relevant MM configuration. The gl account is a material management account.
thanks

Idoc flatfile to IDOC xml issue with new PI7.11 module SAP_XI_IDOC/IDOCFlat

Hi,
I am trying to develop a scenario as mentioned in the blog using the new module available in PI7.1,but I am getting this error
"Error: com.sap.conn.idoc.IDocMetaDataUnavailableException: (3) IDOC_ERROR_METADATA_UNAVAILABLE: The meta data for the IDoc type "ORDERS05" is unavailable."
I have made every configuration correct and IDOC meta data available in both SAP R3 and PI,but it is still complaning about the meta data does not exist.
Blog: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/13743%3Fpage%3Dlast%26x-order%3Ddate
did anybody face issue with the new module available "SAP_XI_IDOC/IDOCFlatToXmlConvertor",please help me or give me mre information why I am getting this meta data error.
Thank you,
Sri

Hi Sri,
To Convert IDOC Flat file into IDOC xml from the given blog, the IDOC flat file should be present in standard format like:
E2EDK01005                    0000047110815000000000001.........
E2EDKA1003                    0000047110815000000000002.........
E2EDKA1003                    0000047110815000000000003..........
E2EDKA1003                    0000047110815000000000004........
The Flat file have relationship as IDOC Number "000004711081500000" and segment sequence "0000001".
If your flat file is not in this formate so i don't think that module is able to convert into IDOC xml. and if your file is already in this format then it may be issue with destinations which are created in NWA.
Thanks
Harish

Network issue with initial connections on Hyper-V

This is the opposite of all the other networking issues I have seen with Hyper-V- anyone run into this?
I am running Hyper-V on a Server Core installation, and have had the same issue when I used Server 2012R2 as when I used Server 2008R2 on the same server as a virtual host. The server is an HP ProLiant DL360 Gen8 with 2x 8-core processors, 32 GB RAM. The
VM is sized and configured to stay within 1 NUMA node. It uses a single port of the 4-port HP/Broadcom 331 NIC, with all the TCP LSO settings disable at the switch, host, and guest, same with the power management settings. We have ProxyARP on the network,
so I have set the ArpRetryCount key to 0.
I have seen it happening with and without SR-IOV enabled. The guest OS is an RDS server, so for the sake of our CAL's it has to stay at Server 2008R2. I have set up a HOSTS file to mitigate this problem, as it seems to be a DNS issue- Here's what happens:
The first time I visit a resource, the server will timeout. An example not in our HOSTS file does this consistently: If I go to https://mail.mydomain.com/OutlookWebAccess, it spins for a couple of minutes before timing out. I hit refresh and the page loads
immediately. This server is colocated in-house, as is the mailserver. I'd say it is a DNS issue at some level, but I'd like to know what level it is- Is it just timing out trying to cache the DNS request, or is there a performance issue with a DNS server on
the network? (All of our DNS is AD-integrated running on DC's).
Here is where I'm seeing this:
Internet Explorer- described above
Salient Interactive Miner- at the login screen, it searches for a database and times out. If I go to the setup and enter the IP address, it still times out. It will not find the database server until I quit and restart the program. If this is the same issue,
it would obviously not be a DNS problem.
I DON'T see it in GP9 connecting to a datasource
Prior to setting up the HOSTS file, I saw this in Windows Explorer connecting to network shares on the same LAN segment.
This appears to only happen to the Hyper-V guest OS. As a best practice, whenever Windows Update runs, I update the Integration Components.
I have the bindings properly ordered on the guest VM, with the network adapter the goes to the physical NIC first, and IPv4 ordered before IPv6.
All updates are isntalled, and the firmware is at it's latest revision.
Any ideas?

Hi Daniel,
" This appears to only happen to the Hyper-V guest OS. "
Do you mean that any other hosts can access the network resource normally except these VMs ?
If yes , my suggestion is to disable the VMQ on the physical NIC for the VMs , then try test again .
Best Regards
Elton Ji
If it is not the answer please unmark it to continue
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Issue with S_TABU_LIN

Hi,
I have implemented S_TABU_LIN object with Z Organisational level ( region specifc) to restrict access to few z tables at line item level.
Usually before implementing S_tabu_lin , during execution of Z transactions a pop up used to come to select the region. now after implementing S_TABU_LIN the region values are picked up from this object and values specifc to the region are displayed without the popup anymore.
its working for most of the transactions, but we are facing a issue with one transaction, the region is picked up from the S_tabu_lin object but sitill the popup comes and when we click on F4 for help its throwing the below dump
Runtime Errors         GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED
Date and Time          07.07.2011 23:06:46
Short text
     Field symbol has not yet been assigned.
What happened?
     Error in the ABAP Application Program
     The current ABAP program "SAPLSVIX" had to be terminated because it has
     come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
What can you do?
     Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.
     To process the problem further, contact you SAP system
     administrator.
     Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look
     at and manage termination messages, and you can also
     keep them for a long time.
Error analysis
     You attempted to access an unassigned field symbol
     (data segment 32773).
     This error may occur if
This error may occur if
- You address a typed field symbol before it has been set with
    ASSIGN
- You address a field symbol that pointed to the line of an
    internal table that was deleted
- You address a field symbol that was previously reset using
    UNASSIGN or that pointed to a local field that no
    longer exists
- You address a global function interface, although the
    respective function module is not active - that is, is
    not in the list of active calls. The list of active calls
    can be taken from this short dump.
w to correct the error
If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
keywords:
"GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED" " "
"SAPLSVIX" or "LSVIXHXX"
"CALLBACK_F4"
If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error
notification to SAP, include the following information:
1. The description of the current problem (short dump)
     To save the description, choose "System->List->Save->Local File
This error may occur if
- You address a typed field symbol before it has been set with
    ASSIGN
- You address a field symbol that pointed to the line of an
    internal table that was deleted
- You address a field symbol that was previously reset using
    UNASSIGN or that pointed to a local field that no
    longer exists
- You address a global function interface, although the
    respective function module is not active - that is, is
    not in the list of active calls. The list of active calls
    can be taken from this short dump.
w to correct the error
If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
keywords:
"GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED" " "
"SAPLSVIX" or "LSVIXHXX"
"CALLBACK_F4"
If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error
notification to SAP, include the following information:
1. The description of the current problem (short dump)
     To save the description, choose "System->List->Save->Local File
Also the issue is faced by users who are having access to S_tabu_lin implemented roles. other users are able to execute the transaction with out any dump.
If any one of you has faced a similar issue, please help me in resolving this issue.
Thanks,
Sanketh.

Hi Sanketh,
This issue occurs if there are any inconsistencies with the Function modules (FM) used in the program that was associated to the custom transaction code. Please check with the ABAPer to identify the root cause, since it is not an issue related to Security.
They will be able to quickly help you out with the solution.
Regards,
Raghu

Having issues with Surface Pro 3 downloading boot image over PXE

Hi,
We've recently started to buy the new Surface Pro 3 with the new USB 3.0 Gigabit Ethernet adapter and we have some issues deploying them through SCCM. Basically, with the Pro 2 and Fast Ethernet adapter we have no issue at all, of course the deployment is
a bit longer than on any other computer, but it is still quite faster than the latest Surface.
We have the new 8.13.414.2014 driver injected in the Win 8.1 boot image for the USB 3.0 Gigabit adapter and all the drivers assigned to the new Surface in SCCM.
The problem occurs when we try to load the boot image after choosing PXE, it takes more than an hour to load it when it shouldn't take more than 5 minutes.
I tried rolling back to the old driver (8.6.128.2013) and use the Fast Ethernet adapter, use the Fast Ethernet adapter with the new driver and use the new adapter with the old driver, but it's still slow in any case, so
I'm pretty sure it has something to do with the new Surface and not the Ethernet adapter.
Anyone have an idea what could be the problem here? Anyone having issues with Surface Pro 3 and SCCM 2012?

I would imagine you have upgraded to R2, have you also applied KB2905002.
This hasn't got anything to do with the TFTP loading phase of the boot image.
Similar thread to this can be found here:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/a6d80714-dc26-43db-a071-93eaee267122/surface-pro-2-surface-ethernet-adapter-super-slow-pxe?forum=configmanagergeneral
I already asked in that thread the same question, but how about normal PCs that are connected to the same network segment as the Surface devices, do they boot slow also?

Issue with a graphical mapping -

Hi folks,
I have an issue with a graphical mapping.
We are replicating the Material Master, with an interface of ECC -> PI -> JDBC.
The idoc we are using is the MATMAS.MATMAS05, and in the database we created 5 tables, simulating the structure of the source idoc. The tables are: MARA, MARC, MARD, MBEW, MAKT.
The fact is that we need some data of some segments (tables) in another ones.
In this case we I need to take a value of the segment E1MARCM (MARC) to the MBEW table. The value is: SERNP.
The condition to copy that value is the centre (WERKS). So, the condition will be:
If MBEW-WERKS == MARC-WERKS,
then MBEW-SERNP = MARC-SERNP.
The problem I'm having is that I have to lookup in many different E1MARCM segments, and the relation is not 1...1, nor, E1MBEWM is a child of it (they are in the same level.)
For example there could come:
- E1MARCM_1 (WERKS = 0001)
- E1MARCM_2 (WERKS = 0002)
- E1MARCM_3 (WERKS = 0003)
- E1MBEWM_1 (WERKS = 0001)
- E1MBEWM_2 (WERKS = 0002)
- E1MBEWM_3 (WERKS = 0002)
- E1MBEWM_4 (WERKS = 0003)
- E1MBEWM_5 (WERKS = 0003)
Am I clear with the requirement?
Any answer will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
.Juan.

Hey folks, any advice or input about this?
Thanks again.
Juan

Issue with IDOC occurence and SeeBurger message mapping

Hey Guys
While developing a EDI 850 to IDOC scenario i came across this issue with pre-delivered Seeburger mapping(A_850_V4010_to_I_ORDERS05).
I actually need to post multiple IDOC's to SAP system in the same message so i changed the IDOC occurence to unbounded and re-imported that as a .XSD file in Integration repository.
Earlier the pre-delivered message mappings provided by SeeBurger(under SEEBURGER_HIGH-TECH, 1.7.1 of seeburger) was working fine for me since i was posting only 1 IDOC but now the mapping is failing as the IDOC occurence has changed(unbounded).
Is there a way we can do some settings on SeeBurger server or Bic so that we can use the pre-delivered mapping for Multiple IDOC's as well?
I just want to make sure before i start off with doing whole of the mapping manually.
Thanx
Aamir

Thanx for the input guys
@Deepthi.
Doing whole of mapping manualy is definitely the last option but i m looking for ways to re-use the pre-delivered SeeBurger mapping.
>>Seeburger Mapping is only just to convert XML to EDI and EDI to XML.
Bic mapping designer does this,i m dealing with message mapping of XI(convert source to target) not Bic designer right now,and Bic does more than just XML to EDI and vice versa,it handles other industry standards too.
@Jens
>>The XI message mappings from Seeburger in the Industry solutions are mapping templates
Yeah,but the mapping template i have deals with 850 to ORDERS05,when i change IDOC occurence and re-import it back in Integration repository,it doesn't stays as ORDERS05,it has to be changed to user defined message interface(in my case MI_ORDERS05) so i m unable to use 850 to ORDERS05 template.
@Seshagiri
>>Open the Seeburger SWCV From the IR--goto External Def---Select the right one and copy it and paste it in notepad.
Changing the occurence is not an issue,i want to re-use the pre-delivered mapping in Integration repository,which is not working.
Looks like i need to do it manually
Thanx
Aamir

Issue with flipping of strings in jsff page

We are facing the following issue with strings of type A:B in Arabic language.
In the UI, all A:B strings are supposed to be shown as B:A in Arabic, where A is a TOKEN value and B is a TRANSLATABLE STRING. But this is not happening in the UI.
So a String that is shown as ORG4-V1:Segment Values in English,we expect it to be shown as Segment Values : ORG4-V1 in Arabic, but it is displayed as ORG4-V1:Segment Values in Arabic also.
Following expression is used for displaying the string :
<af:showDetailHeader text="#{bindings.ValStructureCode}#{(bindings.ValStructureCode.inputValue==null) ? null:':'{CstCoreSetupGenBundle['Header.CostingAttributes']}"
This is shown as ASSET Default: Costing Attributes in the UI while it should be Costing Attributes : Asset Default (Here 'Asset Default' is the ValStructureCode)
For further details please refer to bug#11934853

I apologize for the above and the thread has been posted here as I was unable to access the correct category due to some technical issues with Oracle forums. Also, the mentioned issue is in critical state and has a deadline so thought of posting to get it resolved as soon as possible. Specific categorization will be surely taken care in future.
Moving the thread to below location:
http://myforums.oracle.com/jive3/thread.jspa?threadID=1023776
Edited by: 931435 on Jun 6, 2012 12:25 AM

Issue with Report painter report

Hi Gurus
I need your help with an issue with one of our report painter reports. I have created a new report with Fiscal Year, Ledger, Company code, and Account number range in General data selection. The report row has field Segment and each period corresponds to one period of the fscal year. In here, I have selected Period and Record type 0 as characteristics. The basic key figure is KSL for second currency.
I am able to save the report but when I execute it, I get the error that
*Characteristic GJAHR cannot be combined with key figures*
Can someone please help me as why I am getting this error?
I appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Shalu

Hi
I think you have to rechek the genral data selection setting , related to fiscal year.
had u defaulted the fiscal year or used variant for fiscal year
Thanks
alok

Need clarification on issue with tablespaces

Hi All,
I needed clarification on this issue with tablespaces.I am following a guideline which says "Presently,The general rule of thumb is to concentrate on tablespaces that are 90% or greater used and have less than 2 GB of free space"
My Scenario:-Now i have tablesace which is 97.23 % and the free space is 10 gb.Please advise me that whats the best next step I can take in this respect?
I am very new to this and just following the guideline,so can you all please explain me some details about this.
Thanks

Well, the guideline says "*and* have less than 2 GB of free space"
Since that tablespace as 10GB of free space, the guideline says that you do not need to concentrate on it. Eh ?
I would be careful with guidelines that are hard-coded in this manner. You need to know the context in which the guideline was set.
Assuming that your database/application doesn't grow suddenly by 1GB or larger (or create temporary segments / objects of 1GB or larger), the "2 GB of free space" might make sense. Then, again, it depends on the extent allocation type. What size are extents getting allocated.
You should check with your organisation's senior DBAs on what happens if you don't concentrate on a tablespace because it is outside the guidelines !

PO outbound IDOC - Issue with Unit of measure

Hi,
I am facing issue with unit of measure.
1) In the PO outbound idoc in segment E1EDP01, the unit is always converted into ISO code and sent. Is there any way to avoid it.
2) Now while changing unit to ISO code, it checks if it is preset in T006 table. Now in some of the cases like Unit FT3, there are no entries in T006 table, hence IDOC is going into error. Let me know how can this be resolved. Do I need to update T006 table if yes then how can I do it.
Thanks.
Regards,
Shahu

Sorry.. Posting it in ABAP Development forum.

PO outbound interface - Issue with Unit of measure

Hi,
I am facing issue with unit of measure.
1) In the PO outbound idoc in segment E1EDP01, the unit is always converted into ISO code and sent. Is there any way to avoid it.
2) Now while changing unit to ISO code, it checks if it is preset in T006 table. Now in some of the cases like Unit FT3, there are no entries in T006 table, hence IDOC is going into error. Let me know how can this be resolved. Do I need to update T006 table if yes then how can I do it.
Thanks.
Regards,
Shahu
Edited by: shahuraj shirure on Mar 5, 2008 1:06 AM

Its always that while sending Units from SAP, it needs to be sent in ISO code and SAP always receives units of measure in the ISO unit format only.

ECC6.0 upgrade issue with IDoc release

Hi experts,
we are in the process of upgrading our ECC environment from 5.0 to 6.0. We have quite a few interfaces which use ORDERS/Invoice Idocs in customised form. In ECC5.0 environment, we had developed a Z segment in the ORDERS Idoc and the segment release was set as 640. Everything worked fine in ECC5.0.
In upgraded environment, SAP has released new version of some segments. one of those is E1EDP01. This segment has 2 new versions in ECC6.0 environment - 007 and 008. This change in the version changes the data in the IDoc and hence interface goes in error at the EDI provider.
We have tried to use 640 as the IDoc segment release in the partner profile of the IDocs. This still gives us an issue because the 007 version of the segment E1EDP01 has release 620 and hence the Idoc picks up 007 version instead of 006 version as desired. When we change the partner profile with Segment release in the IDoc type as 46C, it gives us an issue in the Z segment saying that the IDoc segment is not released in 46C and the Idoc goes in error.
has any one faces such situation in the past? if yes, please throw some light.
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
Iam new to SAP. Thars why i cant understand well to do upgrade,
Then i found out some notes from internet about Upgrade : SAP Note Number 857904 (upgrade from Release 6. To 7.0).
In that notes,
Actually i would like to know about some key words (for example : ASSIGNING, REPLACE, TRANSFER. ) which how to work in the Release 7.0
Always i have some objets in 4.6C.
Ex 01: READ DATASET p_dataset INTO wa_record
Ex 02 : TRANSFER i_crhu TO p_crhd
LOOP AT i_crhd.
*disable controls in crhd
    PERFORM f_disable_crhd.
    TRANSFER i_crhd TO p_crhd.
    IF sy-subrc NE 0.
      MESSAGE a045.        "Error when transfering data to error file
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
CLEAR i_crhd.
CLOSE DATASET p_crhd.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    MESSAGE a039.                      "Error at close dataset
ENDIF.
OPEN DATASET v_crhd FOR OUTPUT IN TEXT MODE.
And then i have some FM (ex : WS_UPLOAD , WS_DOWNLOAD)
So I have changed the code for WS_UPLOAD by GUI_UPLOAD
                              and WS_DOWNLOAD by GUI_DOWNLOAD
now my problem is to know about some key word which how to work in ECC6 (for example ASSIGNING, REPLACE, TRANSFER. )
thanks in advance
Rathy

ORDERS05 issue with segment E1EDK36

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for