Organizing strategy

I am seeking advice or assistance simply setting up a game-plan for using this software.
For years I've simply organized .jpg photos directly into a series of subsetted folders on my harddrive. I recently decided to try once again to get the hang of organizing photos into iphoto but I just can't seem to generate a good strategy.
From the very start, I can't even seem to resolve how to use events. Is it correct that they are not really folders that can have visible subfolders? If not, then won't they just pile up in number indefinitely? Wouldn't it be better to have some sort of limiting hierarchical scheme, say, year? And how many photos can be stuffed into a single event before it becomes unwieldy?
I have so many questions, but let me settle for a concrete example.
Consider a long X-country trip consisting of many "roll" downloads -- that is, events automatically created upon download into iphoto. Is it wise to retain these events as download dates, organize the events into, say, days of the trip, merge all downloads into a single event, "X-cty trip", generate several descriptive events like, say, "Yosemite", "Niagara", etc... if the latter, then how are these banded together please? I know they can be searched for but what if I prefer that they stay together in some clickable folder?
If a single mega-event is suggested, then how to extract subsetted events such as, say, "Yosemite", etc.?
Many thanks for the remedial help....

I can't even seem to resolve how to use events. Is it correct that they are not really folders that can have visible subfolders?
They're not Folders, really. They are Groupings of photos base on Date and Time. And, no, you cannot have 'sub-Events' or nested Events.
If not, then won't they just pile up in number indefinitely?
Yes.
Wouldn't it be better to have some sort of limiting hierarchical scheme, say, year?
Might Be.
And how many photos can be stuffed into a single event before it becomes unwieldy?
There is no limit, apart from the iPhoto Limit: 250,000 images.
But while Events were the marketing signature of iPhoto, they are very limited. Events are Organisation for folks who don't want to Organise. So here's a quick and easy way to group your Photos.
The moment you want to Nest Events, or group them by year is the moment you outgrow them.
The good news is that all the other organising tools come into play:
Album
Ratings
Keywords
Smart Albums
and these offer you pretty much infinite flexibility.
I use Events simply as big buckets of Photos: Spring 08, July - Nov 06 are typical Events in my Library. I use keywords and Smart Albums extensively. I title the pics broadly.
I keyword on a
Who
What
Where basis (The When is in the photos's Exif metadata). I also rate the pics on a 1 - 5 star basis.
Using this system I can find pretty much find any pic in my 25k library in a couple of seconds.
So, for example, I have a batch of pics titled 'Seattle 08' and a typical keywording might include: John, Anne, Landscape, mountain, trees, snow. With a rating included it's so very easy to find the best pics we took at Mount Rainier.
File -> New Smart Album
set it to 'All"
title contains Seattle
keyword is mountain
keyword is snow
rating is 5 stars
Or, want a chronological album of John from birth to today?
New Smart Album
Keyword is John
Set the View options to Sort By Date Ascending
Want only the best pics?
add Rating is greater than 4 stars
The best thing about this system is that it's dynamic. If I add 50 more pics of John to the Library tomorrow, as I keyword and rate them they are added to the Smart Album.
Keywording takes time to set up, there's no doubt about it. I use Keyword Manager as it's much more powerful than the inbuilt system, and adds the possibility of nested keywords. So, for instance, if I add John to a photo it also adds 'Family'. Now I can add many keywords to a pic quickly.
In the end, organisation is about finding the pics. The point is to make locating that pic or batch of pics findable fast.
To your specific example:
I would merge all those photos into a SIngle Event: Cross Country Road Trip.
Then I would completely forget about the Event.
Then I would create keyword the Photos 'Niagara' 'Yosemite' and so on and create Smart Albums based on that Event.
I would then create a New Folder (File -> New Folder) and name it "Cross-Country 2010 or whatever' and then drag those Niagara and Yosemite albums to the Folder.
Result: A Folder of the whole trip, containing Albums for particular elements of the trip.
Remember, Albums use no HD space. The simply reference your pics in the Library. A pic can be in 50 albums and you no extras space whatever.
Regards
TD

Similar Messages

  • Best strategy for importing organized images

    Hello,
    I have recently started using Aperture in my photography workflow and I need some advice from the experts on the best strategy to import the existing .JPGs from my hard disk into my Aperture library.
    Prior to using Aperture, my workflow was as follows:
    1.) I would import ALL the photos from my digital camera to a folder on my hard disk (one folder for each date of import). These, in effect, were my 'master' images, which I never edited or deleted.
    2.) Next I would make a copy of each new master folder, under a separate folder called 'picks', where I would go thru and delete the bad ones and occasionally make some minor edits or crops to the good ones. These 'picks' folders are what I used for my slideshows, photo galleries, etc.
    NOW, as I'm moving everything to Aperture, I'm attempting to find the best strategy to import everything, where I would maintain both a master copy of everything that came off my camera and the already organized 'albums' of 'versions' the represent my 'picks', but also reduce some of the redundancy of having duplicate copies of 60-70% of the photos in my library.
    Here is where I need some advice. In the case of new photos imported directly from the camera into Aperture I have managed to figure out how to import the master images and then create albums of versions for my good pics. However, I haven't found any way to import my existing masters and picks without importing two copies of each "good" pick.
    Is there any way I can get Aperture to recognize that the photos in my 'picks' folders are actually 'versions' of some of the original 'masters' so I don't need to import two master copies of each of my good pics? (I generally left the file names the same.)
    I have several thousand existing pics on my hard disk that I'm hoping to import into Aperture so I'm hoping there is an efficient way to do this!
    Many thanks for the help!

    HI I would also be interested in how others do this. I have been playing with aperture for some time and I am still not sure whether to commit to it.
    I also keep my masters in a folder structure with year at the highest level and day of shooting below that.
    I know its not necessary to do this in Aperture but I am not sure I understand why or if its a bad thing to do.
    Would love to her what others think and advise.
    Thanks

  • Moving from folder-organized photo library on networked NAS to iPhoto...

    Hello,
    This is a fairly broad question, I know, but I've been researching for almost a full week and still at a loss as to what to do, so I thought some of the kind souls on here might be able to cut thru the forest of info out there to help me.
    I vetoed iPhoto long ago but am now interested in trying it out & testing it against Picasa. However, I have a fairly large photo library that I keep on NAS, and definitely want to keep it there. Basically the research I've been doing has scared me, with all the horror stories about mixed libraries and the dangers of referenced libraries (which is what I was thinking would probably be the way to go), so now I'm a bit frozen.
    My photos are currently folder-organized, mostly by date, but the level above date is by major categories (such as child's name, etc). I realize the date organization becomes redundant if I migrated to iPhoto, and even the categories seem redundant too if I can tag them all instead, etc.
    The Picasa part was pretty easy, since I can just point it to the externally stored library and it does the rest, not moving anything. That part of Picasa is brilliant and makes a strong argument for going that route. My big hangup with it is the lack of nested collections - particularly in the web environment. The organizational aspects of Picasa seem a bit lackluster - and iPhoto sounds to be pretty good at that.
    But with iPhoto, I'm having trouble deciding how to structure things and get started. I've read up on moving an existing iPhoto library to an external drive, but my impression is that to achieve what I'm trying to, I would need to import the entire library into local iPhoto library FIRST, then go backwards and migrate that iPhoto libary back onto NAS - which would then be a duplicate of the entire library since I'd be leaving the original intact to continue using with Picasa. Is that indeed the way to do it? I'm a little worried about ending up with an undifferentiated mass of 50+ Gigs of pics in iPhoto that i'd then need to go thru individually to tag (a monstrous task), as opposed to, say, having the names of folders turned into tags on all the pics within those folders (wishful thinking?).
    To complete the picture of my situation for whoever may be kind enough to read all this, we have an iMac & a MBP, and would love to be able to share the NAS library on our respective iPhotos, and be able to keep "sync'd" up to what the other has done. From reading around it seems this is a little trickier, and the stuff I've been seeing about speed issues with WiFi-connected NAS libraries is not making me any more comfortable.
    I was somehow able to rig just this situation up for iTunes (the library for which is shared & kept on NAS), which works pretty good (although I'm now concerned that that is also a 'referenced library' and liable to the same horror stories and cautions as external referenced libraries for iPhoto - is it the same? - so far so good...).
    I've seen Terence Devlin mention a few times about using 'external managed libraries' instead of referenced libraries, but I'm not sure how to do that. The other vague conclusion I've come to from reading around is that I should probably use iPhoto Library Manager to achieve my goals here, and although I'm aware of what IPLM does, I'm not totally clear about how I would use it most effectively in my situation.
    Whew - sorry for such a long rambling 'question'! This has probably been addressed elsewhere in the boards, but I've been reading for hours and can only get glimpses into a possible strategy for my situation - I thought just asking might nip it in the bud.
    THANKS!

    Welcome to the Apple Discussions.
    A long question with, I'm afraid, a short answer.
    a fairly large photo library that I keep on NAS, and definitely want to keep it there.
    Stick with what you have. iPhoto needs to have the Library sitting on disk formatted Mac OS Extended (Journaled). Users with the Library sitting on disks otherwise formatted regularly report issues including, but not limited to, importing, saving edits and sharing the photos. That pretty much rules out having a Managed Library on that NAS.
    In some more detail:
    My photos are currently folder-organized, mostly by date, but the level above date is by major categories (such as child's name, etc). I realize the date organization becomes redundant if I migrated to iPhoto, and even the categories seem redundant too if I can tag them all instead, etc.
    Here's a fast way to tag them:
    Start at the bottom of your Folder hierarchy and drag a folder of images to the Album Heading in the iPhoto Window. iPhoto will import the pics and make an Album of the same name as the Folder. Now: Want to tag all those pics with the same keyword: Select all (Command - a) and apply the keyword.
    You can work through your images quite fast in this way.
    Alternatively, use an app like Keyword Manager which has Nested Tags as a feature. So, for instance, you can set a hierarchy: John is your Son so tagging 'John' will also add a 'Family' tag and so on. In my case I have tags like 'Seattle' that add 'Washington State' 'U.S' and 'Travel' to the pics. WIth auto completion all I have to type is Sea...
    but my impression is that to achieve what I'm trying to, I would need to import the entire library into local iPhoto library FIRST, then go backwards and migrate that iPhoto libary back onto NAS
    No, all you need to di is start a Library, then move it to an appropriately formatted disk. You don't need to complete the Library first.
    we have an iMac & a MBP, and would love to be able to share the NAS library on our respective iPhotos, and be able to keep "sync'd" up to what the other has done.
    Again, noting that the NAS is not the way to go here, you can simply enable iPhoto Sharing or use the same Library with both machines - very easy.
    I know that these a pretty short answers, and by all means post back if we can be more helpful.
    Regards
    TD

  • SAP Netweaver Portal - Folder structure and report publishing strategy

    Hi gurus,
    I'm working on a project in which we are publishing BW reports in SAP Netweaver Portal (prior to this, we were using SAP Bex Browser) organizing it by Department (workset, 2nd lvl of navigation), Business Processes (workset, 3rd lvl of navigation) and "iview types" (transactions, queries, dashboards and so on). On 1st level we have a workset simply called "Reports".
    For each PFCG role we have on BW (ABAP Server), we created a portal role and defined which of the higher navigation tiers is visible to users (delta-linking the top level navigation worksets to the portal role and setting visible accordingly) and then we assigned Portal roles to the appropriated Group (PFCG role) so all users that have access to certain PFCG role can have access to the corresponding Portal role.
    For example:
    In BW (ABAP) we have a PFCG Role: Sales PMR Analysis - Administrator, which grants access to Sales Infoproviders, queries and data for PMR analysis. The user that have access to it, should be able to see:
    |Reports|
    |Sales Administration|
    v PMR Analysis
      > Web Queries
      > Transactions
      > Dashboards
      > Workbooks
    In Portal we create a workset that has: "Reports" and under it, all Departments (Sales Administration, Financial, Services, Human Resources and so on) set as "not visible". We create a Portal role called PMR Analysis and add the Report/Departments workset, set Sales Administration as visible and add worksets/folders named PMR Analysis, Web queries, Transactions, etc, and all the corresponding iviews under it.
    If we assign this new Portal role to the Group of the corresponding PFCG role, the user will see exactly as the example from above.
    Pros: The users have a clean view of the reports he/she has access.
    Cons: The users doesn't have a clear view of what is available in BW so he can request access. There might be some useful report lost in on of the hundreds of BW roles that he doesn't know it exist.
    One of the options would be to grant visibility to ALL departments, business processes and iviews in Portal and let PFCG security roles control user access, but that might be confusing to have an overwhelming amount of links, making it hard to find what the user needs, specially during first access. Not to mention possible security breaches.
    So, I'd like to know how other consultants are defining this kind of folder structure and report publishing strategy in Portal. Ideally we would like to be able to have:
    - Visibility of all existant reports even those that the user does not have acess (so he can learn that it exist and request access)
    - Clean view of reports, segmented by department and business processes.
    - Possibility to search for reports, even for those that the user does not have access.
    I'd appreciate if you guys can share your experience on this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Leandro

    Cons: The users doesn't have a clear view of what is available in BW so he can request access. There might be some useful report lost in on of the hundreds of BW roles that he doesn't know it exist
    This is not a refutation: your BW developers/consultants should be able to write reports, which points you in case of insufficent backend rights. EP is not designed to be familiar with ABAP security concept and cant take any influence at it.
    One of the options would be to grant visibility to ALL departments, business processes and iviews in Portal and let PFCG security roles control user access, but that might be confusing to have an overwhelming amount of links, making it hard to find what the user needs, specially during first access. Not to mention possible security breaches.
    Yes, bad idea.
    - Visibility of all existant reports even those that the user does not have acess (so he can learn that it exist and request access)
    As you already wrote on your own, this would be not good
    - Clean view of reports, segmented by department and business processes.
    - Possibility to search for reports, even for those that the user does not have access.
    This is not covered by SAP, if you wanna provide that, develop it on your own.
    cheers

  • Seeking best strategy for maintaining multiple encodes of video files

    So here's what I've been doing...
    Say that I have a home video that I've made in iMovie, shared it out to AppleTV format for my AppleTV, and imported to iTunes. I'd like to sync this to my iPod Touch. Ok, I need to convert it for iPod, no issues there. But, of course, now I have two copies of the same content in iTunes.
    To distinguish them in iTunes and on my streamed AppleTV, I add "iPodTouch" or "AppleTV" to the Name of the file, and choose accordingly to view on the AppleTV or sync to the iPod Touch.
    My question to the group:
    Is this the right way of thinking ?
    Also, given AppleTV's lack of organizing my Shared Movies on the TV screen, of course I'm faced with 2x movie titles in the same vertical listing, only with different title suffixes to distinguish them.
    Is this how everyone is generally managing their iPod/Apple TV content ?
    I strictly stream to AppleTV at this point, but am aware that I can selectively sync files to the AppleTV and thus have the built-in option to stream, but won't I still be faced with the multiple titles issue when I see (unsync'd...aka streamed) titles ?
    Wondering what everyone's strategy is here....
    Thanks much in advance !

    If you uncheck a movie by its name it won't get listed on the tv. So there isn't actually any need to give the two versions of the same movie a different name.
    So for the movie encoded for tv, check its name and it will appear on the tv.
    For the movie encoded for ipod, uncheck its name so it won't appear on the tv and add it to a playlist for syncing with your ipod.

  • Strategy for managing edited photos

    I have never used a non-destructive editor before. So I am wondering what a good strategy would be for managign allthe originals plus the edited versions. It seems to me that could get out of control very quick.
    I am using version 5 and I mostly intend to clean up my photos and post them to Flickr or something like that. Usually full resolution.
    Thanks

    There are a few different approaches you can take in seperating the edited photos from the un-edited ones.
    The first thing to note is that all edits are non-destructive, so it's not necessary to organize them seperately from un-edited copites of the image.
    If you like to compare edited from non-edited versions you can view before and after shots in the Develop module:
    You can also save you edits as a Snapshot to come back to and view later:
    Photos with an adjustment applied will have the following icon, so that you can immediately know if they are edited or untouched:
    These are all great ways of distingishing edits you've made to your images. However, if you'd still like to seperate them, you can create seperate collections for your edited photos:
    To do this, I would start by creating a Collection Set for all the images in that upload.
    From there, you can create collections that will be organized underneath that Collection Set
    From there, you can make as many collections as you would like.
    For example:
    All images - unedited
    Best images - unedited
    Best of the Best - unedited
    Best of the Best - edited
    or however you would like to organize them!
    JUST REMEMBER that all of these collections and groups that you are making are not effecting how your images are being organized on the back end. It's up to you to choose the right place for your images, and if you move them or remove them they will not be available in Lightroom as Lightroom does not save copies of your images, and only meta data for your oranizations and adjustments.
    Hope this helps!
    Julia

  • SCW Strategy - CPU/Memory Intense/problems?

    I am trying to see the impact on XI Server with 3 SWC strategy.
    Just brief on 3 SWC Strategy  - Source and Destination of interfaces as separate SWC and mapping is 3rd sWC for each interfaces. However to get this 3 SWC working, we need to create dependencies in SLD .
    AS XI creates Java Objects on backend after you config in GUI, and having references it may impact on GC collection and as well on CPU.  So if this strategy is applied for larger projects, may cause GC to keep these SWC Objects and in turn relevant XI objects (Source, message type, mappings etc ) tied to each SWC in memory and not to flush thru GC cycles. I think this also impact on CPU Processing. I also experienced problems with migrating feature versions to production path as it requires migrating these Interface objects in correct order to load java objects properly and refresh references, and also requires bounce server to refresh objects with pointing to recent migrated Interface (java) objects. It looks complex, but trying to present on my thoughts on backend XI JVM processing. I have not seen many customers implemented this new SWC strategy also.
    I thought of posting this to SDN to seek your thoughts!!

    Hi,
    I admit that the usage of multiple SCW creates confusion for the new person. But Considering the Reusability & scope of several Business processes, these kind of models are necessary in complex/ large scale industries where the mutiple applications/systems integrate together. 
    Have you guyes referred the SCV strategies discussed here,
    /people/thorsten.nordholmsbirk/blog/2006/07/25/structuring-integration-repository-content--part-1-software-component-versions &
    /people/thorsten.nordholmsbirk/blog/2008/12/10/structuring-integration-repository-content--part-2-software-component-versions-revisited
    I think the concept of Base & Canonical SCV mentioned in 2nd blog would be good approach....but of course it depends upon the scop of interface and Business Process.
    Ravi had mentioned very good point about
    AS XI creates Java Objects on backend after you config in GUI, and having references it may impact on GC collection and as well on CPU. So if this strategy is applied for larger projects, may cause GC to keep these SWC Objects and in turn relevant XI objects (Source, message type, mappings etc ) tied to each SWC in memory and not to flush thru GC cycles. I think this also impact on CPU Processing. I
    --> Certainly I doubt if there would be major impact with referecen to GC. The model/strategy you will be setting up that's permanent model....so contineous changes are NOT excpected in it....then that will not be the correct strategy.
    THe Garbage Collection will increase, if the dependecencies where changed contneously and that would affect the memory/resource utilization by server.
    I think the Base/Canonical way of organizing the SCW, may help to clarify the picture and alo it won't affect much as the dependecies will not be affetced between SCWs.
    THanks
    Swarup

  • Questions on SAP Strategy Management

    Dear Experts,
    I am very new to SAP Strategy Management (SSM). I already tried to find some information about it in the web, but unfortunately most documents only provide high level information (mostly marketing slides). Therefore I would be grateful if you could answer the following questions:
    1. SSM provides charts for data visualization. Is there an overview of supported chart types? Is there a source which gives further information about chart customization?
    2. SSM provides a collaboration functionality that enables user to add comments. Can comments only be maintained on query level, or also by navigation state (e.g. comment is only shown, when navigating to Calendar Year 2006 and Company Code 4711)?
    3. Is it possible to print comments / export comments combined with charts / reports to PDF
    4. Can users upload documents (e.g. MS Word docs)?
    5. A new version was just released which is supposed to have a better integration with SAP BI. What are the improvements in terms of integration? How can SAP BI data be accessed?
    6. What are the current system requirements for SSM?
    7. Where can a documentation on SSM be found (I could unfortunately only find an installation guide on service.sap.com)?
    Thanks a lot for your help!
    Marco
    Edited by: Marco on Sep 15, 2008 10:22 AM

    Marco,
    Here is some information about SAP Strategy Management:
    1. SSM provides charts for data visualization. Is there an overview of supported chart types? Is there a source which gives further information about chart customization?
    Strategy Management provides out-of-the-box packaged reporting templates: Benchmarking, Trending, Percent Contributions within subtotals, Exceptions, Rankings, Ad-Hoc reporting of multiple dimensions & metrics.
    With Strategy Management, you can also provide links to reports or charts in other applications for further drill-down or exploration. 
    2. SSM provides a collaboration functionality that enables user to add comments. Can comments only be maintained on query level, or also by navigation state (e.g. comment is only shown, when navigating to Calendar Year 2006 and Company Code 4711)?
    Comments are added by users to specific areas and can be defined as to which user groups have access or visibility to these comments. These comments are directly associated with a specific area (i.e. objective, KPI, initiative, etc.) with a tagging icon to show individual users if there are new, unread, comments since their last access to system.
    Comments are added at the user interface level and would be stored in either the MaxDB or SQL database, depending on how the implementation was configured. 
    3. Is it possible to print comments / export comments combined with charts / reports to PDF
    Strategy Management has an Operational Review function that allows users to capture screenshots, annotate them and publish as a pdf report.
    4. Can users upload documents (e.g. MS Word docs)?
    Throughout Strategy Management is the ability to provide links to other reports, internal or external documentation, as well as other applications. Best practices would have an associated link to documents.
    5. A new version was just released which is supposed to have a better integration with SAP BI. What are the improvements in terms of integration? How can SAP BI data be accessed?
    The improvements are an administrator tool that provides a basic user interface to simplify the handling of BI connectivity: importing schemas, defining virtual measures, creating scorecard metrics, and importing data.
    6. What are the current system requirements for SSM?
    That information can be found in the installation guides.There is a Master Guide and a Sizing Guide which will both be helpful.
    7. Where can a documentation on SSM be found (I could unfortunately only find an installation guide on service.sap.com)?
    The best public resource for documention about SSM is the BPX Community> Enterprise Performance Management
    Hope this is helpful,
    Bob

  • HT5622 I have been using one apple ID for my family as it makes it easier to manage itunes purchases/rentals on all of our devices.  Now that my kids are getting old and my wife has recently purchased an Iphone, I can see that I need to change my strategy

    I have been using one apple ID for my family as it makes it easier to manage itunes purchases/rentals on all of our devices.  Now that my kids are getting old and my wife has recently purchased an Iphone, I can see that I need to change my strategy. I plan to add a few more iphones to the family very soon.  What is your recommendation to manage all of our devices (iphones, itouch, apple tv) for my family?  Can I continue to function with one apple ID or is it time to take the leep into attempting to manage multi-apple ID's? 

    There's a few ways of managing multiple devices on a single computer (and keeping seperate content on each). The following document is worth checking through:
    How to use multiple iPods, iPads, or iPhones with one computer

  • Multiple websites, multiple woes: Best IWeb 09/MobileMe strategy?

    I'm still a bit confused as to the best strategy for using IWeb 09's much-touted-in-reviews but apparently rather limited ability to publish to two or more separate MobileMe accounts.
    In IWeb 08, I would set up several different user accounts on my Mac, associate each one with a separate MobileMe account from my Family Pack, and maintain separate domain files for each (all stored in the same folder on my hard drive, but given different names like "Domain_personal" or "Domain_business"). This worked fairly well, despite the inconvenience of sometimes not having a photo I wanted to use readily available, as it might be part of an IPhoto library that belonged to another account.
    (I would generally log-in to the user account I wanted to use and work on the MobileMe domain file I had "assigned" to that account. But now and then I might forget, and start working on a domain file for the "wrong" Mac user account. That didn't seem to be a problem -- I could still save my latest changes, log out and then log in to the "right" user account, where I could publish my revised domain file to the intended MobileMe account.)
    But in IWeb 09, my previous strategy is resulting in a slew of problems. Unexpected crashes. Or IWeb refusing to save a file after I've changed it (it just tells me the file cannot be saved, no explanation). Or images and/or video files that will suddenly go missing. Last night I found that one domain file/site I had published over and over with no problems in Iweb 08, now appeared to be a complete mess in IWeb 09 -- numerous missing images, including some png files that are apparently part of the Apple-supplied IWeb design template. Yet the graphics (mine and Apple's) were suddenly back when I opened that same domain file in another user account on my Mac.
    So my IWeb 08 strategy does not seem to be working in IWeb 09. I guess an alternative would be: Do all my IWeb work in the same user account, swap domain files as I'd been doing before, and reset my MobileMe identity for that user account every time I want to publish. Or -- essentially the same thing -- use IWeb's ability to maintain multiple sites in the same domain file. But once again, I'd typically need to manually change my MobileMe identity to a different account at publishing time, to get an individual site going to the right place. And hope like heck that I don't accidentally mess up ICal, etc., by accidentally syncing to "wrong" Mobile Me account, to which I've logged in solely to accommodate IWeb.
    Am I missing something here? Is there some logical reason why Apple would set up IWeb 09 to allow you to publish multiple sites, stored in one domain file, to various multiple external sites via FTP with ease? But make it essentially impractical to publish to several different MobileMe accounts, without the hassles I've mentioned?
    It seems to me that if I want to use IWeb 09 for multiple web sites, the only sane thing is to drop my extra MobileMe accounts as soon as possible, and add some more external sites --- since (if you can do the RSS, etc., yourself) Apple has just made it so much easier to publish to anywhere-else-but-MobileMe.
    Anybody have a different take on this? Or a better solution?

    webalias rex wrote:
    Anybody have a different take on this? Or a better solution?
    The following may not be a better solution, but it does provide a different "take". I haven't tried it myself, so I wouldn't be surprised if there's a fatal flaw in the idea. Anyway, taking that risk...
    Since we don't know what, in iWeb '09, is causing your "slew of problems", it's not possible to say whether this proposed approach would make any difference. But in theory it would enable you to:
    • maintain your separate Domain files
    • publish to your multiple MobileMe accounts
    • from the same user account on your Mac.
    Take a look at this Apple doc:
    MobileMe: How to publish a custom website
    The idea is to publish your iWeb sites to different MobileMe accounts from a single Mac user account as +"custom websites"+ and, as that doc says:
    "If you only plan to publish custom sites to your MobileMe account, you can make your site's URL shorter by placing your site (and its main index.html file) in the main Web/Sites folder instead."
    ...Presumably iWeb 09's integrated non-MobileMe publishing is FTP only, not WebDAV that iDisk requires. So you would need the free Cyberduck or pay for Transmit to publish your sites via WebDAV protocol to a MobileMe account's iDisk. And for a Domain you are about to publish, you would have to remember to use the appropriate MobileMe "destination" of the several you've set up to use in Cyberduck or Transmit.

  • Enforcing a strategy plan to only produce one order in a single month

    Hello All,
    I have created a strategy plan that kicks out orders monthly, quarterly, semi-annually and annually. I have used the cycle unit of "MON", so orders get generated in cycles of 30 days. Everything is working great.
    Now, here's a business requirement: only one order can be created in a single month. So, if this strategy kicks out an order on 01/01/09, and they complete it the same day, the next order will be created for 1/30/09. What is the most effective way to enforce SAP to only allow creation of one order in a single month?
    Thank you for your help in advance.
    Alex
    Reference:
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=334722

    Hi,
    As Mr. Venu said along with the Key-date option the scheduling start date and call horizon is also important.
    Reg,
    NNR

  • Is there a major flaw with Iphoto in regards to organizing and backing up?

    Is there a major flaw with Iphoto in regards to organizing and backing up? And how should I proceed??
    Here is my story. I have moved roughly 15,000 photos from 7 computers (4 PCs and 3 Macs - basically everyone's computer in the family) onto one external hard drive. The photos were taken by many different digital cameras, are sparsely labeled, and have the most random names and folders. There are a LOT of duplicates. MY MISSION - label and back them up.
    The way I normally deal with photos/DATA is this: I plug my camera into my Mac and immediately think about organizing and backing them up. With "Preview" I look at photos (and decide which one I like), create a folder called "where-ever I took these photos" and drag them into that folder. The problem with Iphoto is that you have no ability to control folders, unlike many other applications.
    For example, in Itunes you can rename an artist, or even an album, and it will automatically appear in an updated folder. If you alter a photo in Photoshop, it makes you save it is a new file. In Iphoto you cannot make the same "root level" changes without making duplicates. From what I understand, you can place photos into an Album and then export that album (which makes duplicates). Iphoto will rename each duplicate file and then place it in the correct folder. The problem here is I have no idea where the original is to delete it.
    Basically I want to create folders called "Trip to Italy 2003" or "Rachel's Wedding" and place all the photos associated with that event in those folders. The problem I run into is that I have a bunch of duplicates. I have heard of a program called Duplicate Annihilator which has gotten favorable reviews. If I import them into Iphoto all the photos are placed in random named folders. I say random because some of the photos were taken on cameras that didn't have the date set correctly. Hence some of my photos will appear in a labyrinth of folders called "Modified / 2001 / Roll 17 / DCM482 / Image25874654.jpg"
    I am totally willing to wipe my Iphoto library clean and start again if there is a way to organize the photos as described above. Eventually I will take these folders and save them on a data DVD.
    Thanks to anyone who can help.
    Gary

    You do not need to delve into the folders within the iPhoto Library via the finder to access any photo. That is all done within iPhoto itself. If you need a photo for use outside of iPhoto read Terence Devlin's treatise on file access. iPhoto is a DAM application - Digital Asset Management, not a folder manager. There's a big difference. You can use keywords, album and smart albums to organize your photos.
    If you still have the original files you might consider what I do. I rename each file with the date it was taken using the international date format: YYYY-MM-DD-001.jpg. You can download the demo version ofMedia Expression and automatically rename each folder of photos with the EXIF date and a sequential number. This makes chronological searching and sorting much easier both in iPhoto and the Finder.
    If you want to not only manage the photos but the folders then Expression Media will let you do both. It will let you rename files after being imported into a catalog, move them between folders, add ITPC metadata to the files, create virtual albums called Supplemental categories, and much, much more. I use it as my primary DAM and iPhoto for special projects like books, slideshows, calendars, etc.

  • Creation of context index on index-organized table

    I encountered a problem when creating a domain index(intermediate text context index) on a index-organised table in oracle 8i.
    The description of the error is stated below:
    "ORA-29866: cannot create domain index on a column of index-organized table "
    I have configured intermediate text properly and even it worked for those tables which are not index-organised(ordinary tables).
    This problem has occured only when i made the tables as index organised.
    Please provide us a solution to this problem as early as possible.
    In case if you require any more details i shall provide them.

    Please ask questions about Oracle Text (formerly interMedia text) in the Oracle Text forum. You will get a quicker, more expert answer there.

  • Creation of context index on index-organized tables

    I encountered a problem when creating a domain index(intermediate text context index) on a index-organised table in oracle 8i.
    The description of the error is stated below:
    "ORA-29866: cannot create domain index on a column of index-organized table "
    I have configured intermediate text properly and even it worked for those tables which are not index-organised(ordinary tables).
    This problem has occured only when i made the tables as index organised.
    Please provide us a solution to this problem as early as possible.
    In case if you require any more details i shall provide them.

    creation of domain indexes (such as context) on iot's
    is not currently supported in oracle.

  • Batch search strategy based on goods receipt date

    Hello,
    Can some one help me with setting up Batch search strategy based on goods receipt date currently is on batch number.
    Thanks a lot
    Thanks!
    Best Regards
    Srw

    Hi
    If you want to set up Batch search strategy based on goods receipt date......then you have to create GR Date as one charecteristics in T.Code: CT04 and assign this charecter in Class with respect to class type  023
    Then assign this class in Material Master Classification view..
    Make sure in Material master, Purchasing view...you have activated Batch management active check box....
    Then when ever you do GR in MIGO, In batch tab, In classification field maintain the GR Date..
    Then Create sort sequence in  T.Code: CU70 and you can maintain in what basis ie)in assending or desending GR Date you have to search the batch..
    And then Create Batch Search Statergy in MBC1 and there you assign the sort sequence in Details...
    Now  you do your regular procedings.....the material Batch will be searched based on GR Date...
    Reward if useful
    Regards
    S.Baskaran

Maybe you are looking for