Output does not match data sheet as only 1 report was available for selecti

Output does not match data sheet as only 1 report was available for selection in hyperion planning.Can anyone help me in resolving this issues.Its very urgent.

You will need to provide much more detailed information before anybody can help.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Similar Messages

Output does NOT match the layout in Oracle Report Developer

Good afternoon,
I am extremely frustrated. I have been designing a report that has boilerplate text that is a list of questions and possible answers. Those choices typically are "Not Answered", "Yes","No", and "Unknown". I placed a box beside each choice and place a capital X in the appropriate box, based on the results in the database. When I run the report, the text overlays text above, the grey boxes do not show and in general, the output doesn't match the layout.
Sometimes, the questions may relate to other things and there may be as many as 10 or 12 choices. Some of those choices will be exclusive (only 1 of the 10) other times, the answer would be a "Check all that apply" type of condition.
It appears to happen when a report reaches a certain level of complexity although I can't determine just where that threshold is at.
I can't seem to paste an image here to show the layout and the results.
Has anyone else experienced this? Anyone have any idea what I can do to fix this?
I've opened an SR with Oracle Support, but don't expect a quick answser.
Thanks,
Don.

DC,
EUREKA!!! It works. DC, you rock. Oracle Support is still stewing about this one. I'll update my SR to let them know. It seems a silly thing, but the "biggest" change I made was changing the 'X' from a fixed-based-font to a variable-font (was courier and I changed to Times New Roman and selected a smaller font size). Although, just for insurance, I expanded the box a tad also.
Thanks. It shouldn't be this hard, but sometimes, it is.
ps: I'm a 'DC' also, whatever that's worth...
Don.

AddOnsLocalRegistration.sbo file does not match data in the common datab...

We are receiving the following error everytime we logon our pc for the first time: Add-On Outlook_Integration: This Add-on cannot be upgraded. AddOnsLocalRegistration.sbo file does not match data in the common database for this add-on. See SAP Note 1323680 for more information.
A few months ago, SBO Server was moved from one server to a new virtual server, but we had no problems with the addons. The other day, we upgraded from SBO 2007 to 8.8 and now we are having problems with the Outlook Integration.
I have followed the directions in the message noted above, and did find the AddOnsLocalRegistration.sbo file in some odd places, with a reference to the old server. I cleaned this up, on the server and the client and I can get it running...however, after the user shuts down the pc and logs back in the next day, the problem is back.
In the process of cleaning this up (un-registering the addon and removing the addon references in the local .sbo file) I noticed at times that we would still receive this error, when there really shouldn't be an reference to it.
Thanks for any help.

Hi Vaughn.........
I guess you need a re installation of Outlook Integration Addon.
Whatever version addon of OI you installed just uninstall it and Install it freshly from 8.8 setup package......
Regards,
Rahul

The version of iOS on does not match any of the versions of iOS supported for development with this installation of the iOS SDK

Getting this error message as of this morning: The version of iOS on “iPad” does not match any of the versions of iOS supported for development with this installation of the iOS SDK. Please restore the device to a version of the OS listed below, or update to the latest version of the iOS SDK. I've downloaded the latest SDK and gone through the usual turn off and turn on again for iPad and computer, removed and reinstalled the iPad from Organizer and have no idea how to make apps build now. I was prompted to update the iphone too but there's no way I'm updating it if this issue can't be resolved.

Okay these are the steps I took to solve the problem - they may not be the right ones for you but they've solved the problem and saved time hunting for some other solution. Firstly I changed my MAC system to Lion with the £20 download, then I deleted the old Xcode and installed the new version that is app based and doesn't support Snow Leopard, then all was well. I can now update my xcode via the app which is quicker and more logical and can update my iPhone rather than chug along avoiding updates as I need to update my existing apps on the app store and upload a new one.

Aging Report does not match Balance Sheet Receivables/Payables Account

Hi experts,
I am requesting your help to find out why our customer receivables/vendor payables aging reports total does not match our balance sheet accounts receivable/ accounts payable account for the same period.
I would expect
Customer Receivables Aging Report Total = Balance Sheet Accounts Receivables Account
Vendor Aging Report Total = Balance Sheet Accounts Payables Account
Thank you.
Jane

When you run the report with an ending/aging date in the past (like the end of last month), if you do not display BP's with zero balances, it will leave out BP's who have a zero balance AT THE TIME YOU RUN THE REPORT. Some of them may have had a non-zero balance at the end of the month, but they will be left off anyway. So if a customer owed money on the last day of the month and he paid it on the first of the next month, his balance will not be shown on the report if you run it even one day later.
I feel this is a design defect in the report, but it is the system behavior.
Marcia

Inventory in warehouse report value does not match balance sheet account

Dear experts,
When I run the inventory in warehouse report, the value (using last purchase price) does not match the inventory finished goods account. Can you please advise why?
Thank you for any advice.
Jane

Dear Jane,
The only report for inventory to link to financial statement would be Inventory Audit Report.
All other reports are just for your convenience. They are not financial based.
Thanks,
Gordon

Data in 0FIGL_V10_Q0001 does not match data in ERP report S_PL0_86000028

Hi All,
after using the sdn passively for some time, this is my first posting.
We compare data in the mentioned ERP (SAP ECC 6.0) report with the data from the BI-query. Strangely they don't match in many cases: the value on the nodes ASSETS, LIABILITIES and APPENDIX match exactly. But especially regarding the P&L-node big variances occur.
On strange pehomen occurs regarding the "revenue"-accounts: the accounts which do not match, vary exactly by the same amount (in our case 20,500,000 per each). The selection is the same (currency type, period/fiscal year, Balance Sheet & P&L-structure, CompCode, Ledger 0L)
Finally: The considered time periods do not overlap. And the master data for 0GL_ACCOUNT and 0FUNC_AREA has just be updated. Also the hierarchies for 0GLACCEXT have been transfered from ERP again. The data has been updated to 0FIGL_C10 using delta mode.
This behavior can be observed using the Content Cubes & Query (V10, C10) as well as our copies (ZFIGL_C10, ZFIGL_V10). The Z-copies use a copied version of the function module with the correclty changed input-parameter for the cube C10. The query has not been modified in any way.
Systems:
ECC6.0
BI7.0 SP17
BI CONTENT 7.03 SP6
Thanks a lot for any input,
Best Regards,
Manuel
Edited by: Manuel Busse on Jan 8, 2009 9:43 PM
Edited by: Manuel Busse on Jan 8, 2009 10:03 PM

Hi Simon,
to clear things up: the 0FIGL_C10 is the content containg new general ledger transaction data. the 0FIGL_V10 is a virtual cube based on a function module. The source cube for this function module is 0FIGL_C10. The 0FIGL_V10 has only been created by SAP for queries regarding the balance sheet and P&L, since the function module will handle the correct placement of accounts & nodes depending in the query 0FIGL_V10_Q0001 on their balance value.
The data in C10 has been checked in the meanwhile and matches exactly in the ERP. The data in V10 matches exactly regarding the nodes ASSETS, LIABILITIES and APPENDIX. The other nodes, esp. P&L do not match. Some of the revenue accounts assigned to revenues show a "systematically" higher variance in BI compared to ERP. Those nodes vary by exactly the same amount each (20 Mio. Euro per account), although C10 shows the correct values.
We discovered the OSS note 1233874, too, and it has just been implemented. Will check right now.
Thanks for any input,
Manuel

Minidump filename and .time output does not match

Hi,
I have a few minidumps from different machines. As far as I know, the filename of the minidump indicates the date of dump creation and so does the .time command in windbg. But in my case these do not match for the same dump. THe date in .time is one day
later than the minidump filename.
Is my understanding correct about the minidump filename and .time output?
thanks
Kunal

Hi Kunal,
Can you please check if there's a difference in the date/time between the dump filename and the "Date Modified" for the dump files. You can check the "Date Modified" in windows explorer.
Hope, that'll answer your query.
(Please mark as answer if this resolves your query. Please upvote if this post is helpful.)
Regards,
Rajesh

PDF output does not refresh data in BI Publisher, XML and HTML do refresh

I just upgraded to BI Publisher 10.1.3.4.0 and I noticed that the PDF format of the reports does not reflect recent changes in data, while XML data and HTML output do reflect changes in data immediately.
I'm using BI Publisher to print APEX applications reports. When I change some data in APEX forms, I click again in the Print button and the data remains unchanged. I made some testing inside Oracle BI Publisher, and noticed that XML data and HTML output do reflect changes, but PDF output remains with the old data for some unknown amount of time. I cannot identify a method to force the PDF to refresh, just un-log and log in again several times until the data appears updated. This is serious because when users change data and print again, they expect the changes to be reflected in the new printable report, and may not notice that the data is the old version.
OS is Oracle Enterprise Linux.
Any help on this will be very welcome.
Francisco

Open the report in Edit Mode Click on the reports and in the properties section Uncheck the
Enable Document Cache Property and your issue should be resolved.

Resolve input/output does not match

I've used Audition for years, but I'm unable to record in the new version that I just downloaded. I get the error message that input / output measurements to not match. I've been in and out of preferences and made changes to no avail. Thank you for your help.

We need a few more details of your system. Are you on a PC or a Mac? What operating system are you using? And what audio interface?
Since you say that you have used Audition for years I assume that this means on a PC. In which case it is probably Windows that is giving you the run around with setting up the soundcard correctly for Audition. This FAQ may be of help.
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/973133?tstart=0

Output Does Not MATCH Word Document

Everything is fine till it reaches page 76 (of my 388 page document) and the phrase: District of Columbia.
The original document does not wrap District of Columbia, but the PDF file does.
I am using the PDF printer.
The problem is that District of Columbia is a bookmark linked to the table of contents. I see that during creation of the PDF file, Word goes into a mode that shows hidden text in bookmarks, etc. This makes the phase District of Columbia even longer than it normally is.
A work around I am considering is choosing an oversized page for printing, but the names are criptic and I'll have to look up each to find out which would work. I'm very stuck. I have three other programs that can make a PDF out of the document in just minutes, but the links/bookmarks don't work at all.
Creation using Acrobat (v XI) takes six hours. There are that many bookmarks in the document.
Any suggestions?

My guess is that you are looking at the DOC file with a laser printer or any other printer attached in the print menu. WORD reflows documents to be consistent with the attached printer. You are probably lucky that you made it through 75 pages before there was a problem. The 6 hours is also unreasonably long for the processing of 388 pages, unless everyone might have been a graphic. But even then, that is a huge amount of time.
You are probably using PDF Maker (create PDF menu), but you should still attach the Adobe PDF printer and go through the document before printing or using PDF Maker. Also, go through the preferences in the create PDF menu to select only those things needed. Tags are good for recreating the DOC file (but it is better to not get rid of the DOC file in the first place). The other use for tags is accessibility -- that is often needed, but you might want to try turning it off to see the results.
So, bottom line is to attach the Adobe PDF printer in the print menu and then go through the DOC file to check for the format you are concerned about and see if that duplicates what you are currently getting on p. 76. If it is the same, then you are seeing a standard process by WORD.

Data in RSA3 does not match data in PSA

We recently added a new field (character 40) to our 0customer_attr extractor and are populating it in a user exit. When we execute the extractor in RSA3, the field is populated correctly. However, when we run an actual extraction to BW, the data in this field is not transferred to the PSA correctly. The PSA field is also a character 40 field. In some cases the data in this field is truncated, only the first 12 characters are transferred. At other times only the second half of the field is transferred into the PSA. It is as if something is out of synch between the extract structure and the PSA.
I have replicated the datasource several times and have also reactivated the transfer rules several times. I also tried removing the field from the tranfer structure and reactivating the transfer rules and then readded the field and reactivated. I am not certain what else to try.
Thanks for any help.

Put a break point in the user exit and load the particular record which is getting truncated and see what is actually happening. And once again make sure the field in both BI and R3 is identical in length and type.
thanks.
Wond

PDF output does not match Frame TOC

My Frame TOC is accurate, the tags are correct. My PDF output has the correct Units in place. However, in the PDF TOC on the left nav, the Unit 5 Lessons appear in Unit 4, the Unit 6 Lessons appear in Unit 5, Unit 6 has no Lessons, Unit 7 is correct. I have spent a full day troubleshooting this. Does anyone have an idea what the problem might be?

Strange things can happen thanks to the PDF setup > Bookmarks tab, though I suspect you have already checked that. I've occasionally shot myself in the foot by using two styles for level 2, for example, and not noticing that one of them had decided to sidle into the .pdf navigation as level 3 …
Counsel of despair, if you have full Acrobat, would be to adjust the bookmarks manually so you can hand over the deliverable. Hope someone will come up with a more convincing answer, though!

Numbering in printed output does not match that in source after about 500 pages (RH 7)

Hi There,
I have just upgraded to RoboHelp 7 and have created a new
word template. As with the HTML source I work with, this template
has a numbered style called "step" which has nothing much special
about it.
I just published a word doc (*.doc) and noticed that - at
around pg 500 in the output doc - the numbering stops matching that
in the source document: each topic in the source doc starts at 1,
but after a cut-off point in the printed document each numbered
step starts to continue the preceding list (so if one topic ends
with numbered step 15, the next begins with numbered step 16).
I have compared the source files for topics that are "as
expected" and "not" and I cannot see any difference between the
HTML therein.
Has anyone else seen this / is there any known solution?
Thanks,
Chrissy

I can make the numbering correct throughout by selecting to
output not as a single document, but as separate chapters compiled
into a single master document.
This is not ideal, but is a satisfactory work-around. If
anyone knows any better solution, please reply!

Printer output does not match Print Preview

I'm just starting out with this and did a layout of some photos I took with captions. Using File>Print and then clicking "Preview in the resulting dialogue box shows that everything fits on the sheet of paper. HOWEVER, after printing the page, the bottom is cut off. What is the problem? The printer is an HP DeskJet 5150. As a work-around I've started doing the layouts as if the paper is 8" x 10".
Also, what does the "Soft Proof" check box do in the Print Preview window?

OK romad, the memory problem isn't the Macs but it could be the printers. I have seen this many years ago.
You could also create a test page with one long line from top to bottom and print it. Does the problem still show?
Does it happen if you print a full page photo from i.e. iPhoto directly.
Do you still have AW on this machine? can you paste the content of your problem page into an AW page and print? What is the result?
Somehow we need to do tests to pin down from where the problem is emanating from.
I agree that AW does have a lot that isn't implemented in iWorks, but there are other features that are much better in Pages.

Output does not match data sheet as only 1 report was available for selecti

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for