Output requirement not being hit

We have an output requirement on an output type ZSOL but it is not hitting the requirement. I know this because I even specify that sy-subrc = 4 in the requirement (no other code) and it still creates the output type. This is on the delivery header. What else could I check? Yes the requirement is active.
Regards,
Davis

Hi Jelena,
Thank you for your reply.
Here you can see the details where the manual change flag can be seen (unticked).
Regarding the Requirement checks, when I say all checks passed, I mean that every single value in the code is equal to the value it is checking against, for example:
CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALL CA ' C'. (value is initial = pass)
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVPRS CA ' C'. (value is initial = pass)
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALS CA ' C'. (value is initial = pass)
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RELIK EQ SPACE. (value is initial = pass)
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RFBSK EQ 'C'. (value is 'C' = pass)
Therefore, SY-SUBRC = 0 and the output is determined.
The outcome is exactly the expected, the output is determined.
The issue is in the analysis screen that shows the requirement as not fulfilled even though the output was successfully determined and I cannot see the access sequence used to determine the output.

Similar Messages

Output Requirement not Fulfilled (But output generated anyway?)

Hello Gurus,
I am facing a very strange situation.
I have added a custom field to the field catalog for output determination.
The setup looks all good, the communication structure is populating the field just fine and the output gets triggered as expected.
However, when I go to the determination analysis (VF02 > Header > Output > Goto > Det. Analysis), it shows the infamous message: Output ignored (requirement 901 not fulfilled). I know you will all say that the requirements in 901 are custom and I should check with my developer, but let's skip that part:
From VOFM, my requirement 901 is a 'copy' of 062 and is as simple as below. In debug I could confirm that all checks pass.
FORM KOBED_901.
   SY-SUBRC = 4.
                                     1
   check SY-TCODE = 'VF01'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALL CA ' C'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVPRS CA ' C'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALS CA ' C'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RELIK EQ SPACE.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RFBSK EQ 'C'.
   SY-SUBRC = 0.
ENDFORM.
FORM KOBEV_901.
   SY-SUBRC = 4.
                                 1
   check SY-TCODE = 'VF01'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALL CA ' C'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVPRS CA ' C'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALS CA ' C'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RELIK EQ SPACE.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RFBSK EQ 'C'.
   SY-SUBRC = 0.
ENDFORM.
So the issue is more around: Why is the determination analysis showing me that the output was ignored due to requirement not fulfilled if the actual output was successfully determined and processed in the document?

Hi Jelena,
Thank you for your reply.
Here you can see the details where the manual change flag can be seen (unticked).
Regarding the Requirement checks, when I say all checks passed, I mean that every single value in the code is equal to the value it is checking against, for example:
CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALL CA ' C'. (value is initial = pass)
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVPRS CA ' C'. (value is initial = pass)
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALS CA ' C'. (value is initial = pass)
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RELIK EQ SPACE. (value is initial = pass)
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RFBSK EQ 'C'. (value is 'C' = pass)
Therefore, SY-SUBRC = 0 and the output is determined.
The outcome is exactly the expected, the output is determined.
The issue is in the analysis screen that shows the requirement as not fulfilled even though the output was successfully determined and I cannot see the access sequence used to determine the output.

Output type not proposed in Message Control when PO is created

Hi,
DETAILS
I have set up the system to send a IDOC when a PO is created. I have done the following settings in the system to send the IDOC using the message control functionality in the PO creation screen.
1). Created a new output type ZNEU which is an exact copy of NEU output type provided by the SAP system.
2). Assigned the new output type to the output determination procedure.
3). Enabled the new output type ZNEU for ALE distribution.
4). Maintained the condition records in the system for the output type ZNEU such that for the P org, endor and Docmuent type combination the output shall be proposed.
5). Maintained a partner profile( Logical System ) and assigned the output type ZNEU to this partner profile.
6). Created a Distribution model for Sender ~ Receiver for ORDERS message type.
PROBLEM
When i create a PO the new output type is not getting proposed by the system. I am not sure why it is not getting porposed in the message control.
I tried to manually enter the ZNEU output type in the system to see if the system is accepting. I am getting an error
Partner % does not exist for partner function LS
Any idea what i am missing? Am i missing any configuration or am i doing something wrong?
cheers

The output is not being proposed automatically is becuase you are missing "Condition Records" for the output type ZNEU.
Go to NACE.
Select EF - Purchase Order
Select "Condition Records"
Select ZNEU and select condition records
Now, system will bring the combinations of access sequence. Maintain appopriate record.
This will enable you to get the output type automatically in the purchase order.
Regards,
Naimesh Patel

Requirements not fulfilled for EK01

Hi
I'm trying to invoice some travel expenses (costs) in DP90 and i'm getting a message 'Requirements are not fulfilled for condition EK01' can anyone help.......
Thanks
Sara

Refer & Check SAP Note 30903 - V1215: Requirements not fulfilled
If a condition is entered manually and its requirement is not fulfilled, error message V1215 appears: Requirements are not fulfilled for condition Example: Inserting a condition type manually which is not used during automatic pricing due to the requirement not being fulfilled.
Cause and prerequisites
Change in function PRICING_CHECK (LV61AU08): * Bedingungen prüfen
IF KOMT1-KOBED NE 0 AND INCL_KONDITIONEN NE NO.
BEDINGUNG_PRUEFEN-NR = KOMT1-KOBED.
PERFORM (BEDINGUNG_PRUEFEN) IN PROGRAM SAPLV61A.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
MESSAGE E215 WITH KOMT1-KSCHL RAISING CONDITION. "<-- Reason
ENDIF.
Solution
Workaround solution: Since it mostly concerns conditions to which an access sequence is assigned but which is still to be entered manually, you should create an identical condition (apart from the name) which is only to be maintained manually and does not have this requirement. The source code should not be modified for reasons of consistency.
OR
Refer & Check: SAP Note 102060 - Exclusion when changing conditions manually
Symptom
If an exclusion indicator is set for a condition with a condition record and this indicator is called in a requirement assigned to it, the following procedure can cause the condition to exclude itself so that as a result of the error message no further processing is possible: After you manually change the condition affected on the condition screen, you carry out a new pricing and afterwards you change the condition again manually.
Cause and prerequisites
Field KOMP-KZNEP is not initialized correctly in function module PRICING_CHECK.
Solution
The error is corrected in Release 4.5A, an advance correction is attached.
OR
Refer & Check: SAP Note 668362 - Expected customer price /value with IDoc
Symptom
When you create a sales order via IDoc, the expected customer price or customer value can be assigned in segment E1J3P01. For this, condition types JED1 or JED2 are used. These condition types are set as dimension-dependent conditions by default (T685A-J_3ASZCO) and are thus created on schedule line level.
If you change this setting in Customizing, these condition types are created on item level (see Note 191742). Now, if the price or the value have different values within one item in entry segment E1J3P01, it is not possible to create this condition on item level. The system generates error message V1215 'Requirements are not fulfilled for condition JED1/2'.
Reason and Prerequisites
The system behaves correctly. In this case, condition JED1 or JED2 would have to be created explicitly for the respective schedule lines because different values are assigned in entry segment E1J3P01. However, as Customizing was changed for these condition types, this cannot occur. Error message V1215 displayed in this case is, however, incorrect.
Solution
After the implementation of the advance correction, the system does not display error message /AFS/IDOC021 'Item condition JED1/2 for nnn is not identical in all schedule lines'.
Hope it will solve your requirement.
Thanks & Regards
JP
Edited by: J Prakash on May 20, 2010 9:23 AM

Picking output EK00 not working after upgrade

We have upgraded from 46C and found that in delivery documents picking qty is no longer proposed and the picking output is not being determined .
we have checked both VP01SHP and V/38 and both are setup .
Does anyone know of anything else that might cause this behavoiur.
Regards
Brendon

Hi Brendon,
Please check wheather the condition record is maintained for the the picking output Type EK00.
And also check the inputs parameters for the output like for the delivery the output is maintained.
In upgrades, some times fields,tables and Programes may miss.
In this regard take your abapers help and check the same in the both the systems.
Please Reward If Really Helpful,
Thanks and Regards,
Sateesh.Kandula

Null offset from calibration not being applied to output

I am measuring some load cells using a I 9237. I am setting the null offset using Device > Bridge Calibration in the DAQ Assistant. I measure the offet and hit calibrate. It says "Calibration successful" and I hit finish, but the offset value is not applied to the data.
How do I get this to work?

Hello IamRubber,
How can you see the calibration not being applied? Are you running the same DAQ Assistant to see the offset? If possible, please attach a screenshot from before/after running bridge calibration.
Patrick W.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Output ignored (u2018002 requirement not met)

Hello Guys'
Can any one help to answer the below query
1. In output determination, for SO, for given output type, if we get as Message 502 Output ignored (u2018002 requirement not fulfilled) I understand that, Ideally we should not be able to Print SO. PS: Only one output type is maintained.
2. What else settings are required to stop the print, if the requirement is not fulfilled.
Thank you,
Subhadra

Hello,
Thank you for your views, but in this case the SO is in incomplete status and it is not blocked for the credit. My understanding is if '002' routine is assigned to a particular output type than, in this case it should not print as the SO is incomplet.
But, I'm able to print the SO.
Any idea why its printing?
Any other settings or ABAP code required?
Thank you,
Subhadra

Excelicon is not being displayed in the alv output

Hi,
iam using the standard tool bar, yet the excel icon is not being displayed in alv ouput.and also in the menubar list export the spreadsheet option is gr

OSS# 1140542?
or you may search other.
Edited by: Amit Gujargoud on Nov 3, 2008 3:10 AM

Home directory is not being backed up in Time Machine

Problem: It turns out my home directory does not have any backups in Time Machine for the last year. I've never received any error message indicating it wasn't doing the full backup.
Goal: I'd like to get Time Machine to back up my home folder (which contains 100% of the content I care about) again, ideally in a way where I can keep my history from the last time it backed up successfully.
How I found out:
- I opened Time Machine and realized all the "pink bars" were dimmed all the way back up to Sept. 2011 when I navigated to my home folder or any folder within it.
- I cloned a file within my home folder, did a manual Time Machine back up, opened Time Machine and verified that the backup volume did not contain the cloned file.
- I did this again while watching the Console and verified that it did not make a large enough backup to include the cloned file.
- I explored all the backups in Finder and realized that indeed all the backups that corresponded to the dimmed pink bars in Time Machine had no home folder.
- I did an "ls -a" in the backup volume in Terminal and realized that it was not the case that the home directory was present but merely hidden.
What I've tried:
- I created a new admin account, logged into that and did a manual Time Machine backup from there. The new account was backed up, while the original home directory still wasn't. This continues to be true in subsequent backups made while logged into the main account.
- I examined the exclusions list in Time Machine preferences. The only items were the backup volume itself and another partition of that external drive I use for other backups, as expected.
- I did a "Full Reset of Time Machine" (http://pondini.org/TM/A4.html), with a reboot before re-enabling Time Machine. The plist file did change to become much simpler, but the home folder is still not being backed up.
Other notes:
- I run Dropbox, and have those contents in a folder one level under the home directory
- I run Git
- The existing backups have only used 500GB or so of a 1TB partition, so it's not filling up.
- I ran Verify Disk in Disk Utility on both my backup volume and the mac's HD. The backup volume appeared OK, but the mac HD was "found corrupt and needs to be repaired". I could boot into the Recovery HD and repair it, but I feel like this is a risk and I'd like to have a working backup before I do that (I don't have another external HD around to make a temporary backup). Could the corrupted drive be the reason Time Machine has been silently skipping the home folder?
- My home folder is named "apple". Might this be a problem? I'd rename it, but that's a risk and I'd like a verified backup before doing that.
- The Time Machine plist file in /Library/Preferences is pretty hard to read in pico, TextEdit, etc (maybe this is normal?)
I've scoured the forums and pondini's very thorough troubleshooting pages to no avail. Please let me know if anyone has ideas. Thanks.

Latest update: Bought a new external harddrive, set that up as the new Time Machine volume, but got the exact same results (all but my main user directory are backed up). This is after another Time Machine reset (deleting the .plist), starting up in Safe Mode, and trying to initiate the backup from both the account that doesn't get backed up and another administrator account.
Here is some of the output from the Console when filtering messages for "backupd":
10/5/12 2:51:23.572 AM com.apple.backupd[13529]: Backup content size: 481.57 GB excluded items size: 11.31 GB for volume Macintosh HD
10/5/12 2:51:23.572 AM com.apple.backupd[13529]: Found 1437613 files (470.25 GB) needing backup
10/5/12 2:51:23.573 AM com.apple.backupd[13529]: 564.3 GB required (including padding), 1.5 TB available
10/5/12 2:51:23.581 AM com.apple.backupd[13529]: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
10/5/12 3:40:33.297 AM com.apple.backupd[13529]: Copied 763432 files (21.54 GB) from volume Macintosh HD.
Put the relevant parts in bold. No messages about why it only backed up 21.54GB when it found 470.25GB that needed to get backed up.
Does this make sense to anyone??

Price Difference Account being hit while making AP credit Memo

Hello Experts,
Price Difference Account is being hit while creating AP Credit Memo. I am creating an independent AP Credit Memo (i.e. without any base document). After posting A/P Credit Memo when I look at the Journal Entry it shows 99.43% of amount goes to Price Difference Account and the rest 0.57% goes to Stock account.
Help required please.
Thanks & Regards,
Edited by: Shahzad Nazir on Jan 19, 2011 5:54 PM

Hi Nazir,
This entry may have resulted because once you created the GRPO say for item A, the stock would have been consumed in production. And once you created Invoice and after that when you created credit memo, the system could not find the stock so it posted the difference in price difference account. Please run inventory posting list of the items in grpo to check the same.
Thanks,
Joseph

In the attached VI I dont understand why data from the inner case structures are not being transmitted to the array.

In the attached VI I don't understand why data from the inner case structures are not being transmitted to the array.
Thank you.
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
TEMP.vi ‏25 KB

It took me some time to figure what you are trying to do but I think I have it now.
The SR is still required.
What is happening is your "Bundle By Name" is replacing all of the fields of the cluster, not just the value coming out of the case structure. So to maintain the cluster stuff you do in earlier iterations you can either...
1) Put the "Index array, Bundle by name, and Replace array" inside the case structure and ONLY bundle the value you are setting in that iteration. (as you will see Tim post shortly)
OR
2) Move the Index array before the Case, unbundle all of the fields and feed teh case structure and run them across the case so that ALL of your output tunnels come from the coresponding input tunnel EXCEPT for the filed you are trying to set.
Ben
Message Edited by Ben on 05-05-2010 01:31 PM
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Output device not automatically determined in VF02

Hello gurus,
My default output device is not coming automatically when I add an output type in VF02. This is an issue because output type has requirement 62 set in output procedure, therefore it will not be added until invoice is release to accounting. Futhermore, we have implemented Argentina eletronic invoice, which won't allow to change the invoice once it has been released to accounting. Quite a contradiction. So I'm hoping the output type will be added by condition technique while releasing to accounting, yet i believe since the output device is not being automatically determined in the background, it won't do.
Any ideas?
Thank you very much.
JP

Hello guys,
I had checked all your suggestions before posting this thread, but still the issue remains:
- VV31 condition records are fine but I cannot set a single output device since it will be used for many output devices.
- Analysis was carried in VF02 and the condition is being picked up but since requirement 62 is set in the output procedure, which forces the billing document to be first released to accounting, the condition is being removed:
- Printer is set in the user profile options, but does not come as default in VF02
Thank you all.
Kind regards,
JP

XSLT for adding Namespace is not being executed at runtime

Hi Gurus,
I am trying to add a Namespace to inbound xml and I wrote a simple XSLT mapping as below, when I execute this using XML spy or in Operation mapping manually it is working fine and giving me output as expected but at runtime it is not executing, I am getting same input xml as output xml and receiver agreement is failing...
Appreciate your thoughts..
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
     <xsl:output method="xml" encoding="UTF-8"/>
        <xsl:template match="*">
          <ns0:SalesXmlExtended xmlns:ns0="urn:/company.com/H/sndr">
          <xsl:copy-of select="//SalesReportInfo"/>
     </ns0:SalesXmlExtended>
     </xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
input xml is as below....
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<SalesXmlExtended>
     <SalesReportInfo>
          <SalesReport>
               <Detail>
                    <deptNum>0270</deptNum> etc...
output I am getting in XMLSpy and OM is as below, this is exactly what I need...
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:SalesXmlExtended xmlns:ns0="urn:/company.com/H/sndr">
     <SalesReportInfo>
          <SalesReport>
               <Detail>
                    <deptNum>0270</deptNum>
Thanks...
Sukarna...

Hi Baskar,
Yeah, that is what my issue is , it shouldn't be failing but it is...
I tried by manipulating the required namespace in the input file and it is working fine with out any errors....so I am guessing the XSLT is not being executed...
I am getting below error which is valid because the transformation is not happening
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?> <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_ERROR</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>-BS_HOUSE_OF_FRASER_DEV</SAP:P1><SAP:P2>-BD1_100,urn:.com/HoF/POS/EOD/sndr.SI_Out_HoFSales_XML</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3/>
<SAP:P4/>
<SAP:AdditionalText>No standard agreement found for , BS_HOUSE_OF_FRASER_DEV, , BD1_100, urn:/HoF/POS/EOD/sndr, SI_Out_HoFSales_XML</SAP:AdditionalText
><SAP:Stack>Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -BS_HOUSE_OF_FRASER_DEV to receiver -

Routes not being followed after upgrade from ES to ES2

We are upgrading from ES to ES2 and now our routes are not working.
We have 2 routes leaving an AssignTask operation, Deny and Approve. The users get assinged their form, they make any required changes, and then click one of these buttons to complete the process. In ES this works fine. In ES2 they can see the buttons, but when they click them the route is not being followed and the process remains stuck at the AssignTask operation.
If they close the form they can use the approve or deny icons on the task summary panel but they loose any changes they have made.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Behavior change...?
SELECT xmlelement("TestMsg",
                    xmlelement("MESSAGE",
                    XMLFOREST(m.tx_id   "MsgNum",
                              m.tx_type "MsgTyp"
                    )) ut_xml
FROM (select 1 tx_id, 'test' tx_type from dual) m
will give output in 10.2.0.4.0 EE
UT_XML
<TestMsg>
   <MESSAGE>
      <MsgNum>1</MsgNum>
      <MsgTyp>test</MsgTyp>
   </MESSAGE>
</TestMsg>Edited by: Marco Gralike on Mar 29, 2011 1:07 PM

When I plug in my iPhone to sync, it starts but does not complete the process and several pieces of data are not being transferred to my iPhone from my MacBook Air.

Problem:
When I plug in my iPhone to sync, it starts but does not complete the process and several pieces of data are not being transferred to my iPhone from my MacBook Air.
Any help that you can provide in helping my iPhone accurately sync with iPhoto and iTunes will be greatly appreciated.
Symptoms:
1)   Sync: It’s not completing the sync. Below, I’ve provided all of my settings from the iTunes Summary tab so that you might tell me if I’ve selected any incorrect options. I prefer to sync the “old school” way – by connecting to the computer – as opposed to syncing over the cloud. Perhaps this is what’s causing the problem? Here is a list of the steps displayed in the iTunes window as the sync progresses:
waiting for sync to start (step 1 of 7)
backing up (step 2 of 7)
preparing to sync (step 3 of 7)
determining apps to sync (step 4 of 7)
preparing apps to sync (step 5 of 7)
importing photos (step 6 of 7)
waiting for changes to be applied (step 7 of 7)
syncing apps / copying 1 of 4 (App name) (step 7 of 7)
canceling sync
apple icon
2)   Photos: I've selected only certain of my iPhoto albums to sync to my iPhone. All of the albums are correct/complete in iPhoto. All of the albums are listed on my iPhone, both before and after the sync, but the albums are empty (no actual photos) before and after the sync. Perhaps this is tied to the fact that the sync isn’t completing, but because “importing photos” is one of the steps that the incomplete sync displays, I don’t know.
3)   Apps: When I launch iTunes and click on the Apps folder under the Library listing, then click on the Updates tab, iTunes searches for any Apps needing to be updated and provides a list. If I click on Update All, the Apps are successfully updated in iTunes. But, when I plug in my iPhone so that the updates will transfer to the apps on my iPhone, the updates don’t transfer to the apps on my iPhone and those apps still reflect that they need updating on the iPhone.
Other Potential Pertinent Info:
The flash memory hard drive on my MacBook Air recently died (perhaps a month or two ago). Apple had emailed me about a known issue and literally the next day, my MacBook Air crashed. I installed a new flash memory drive and re-installed everything from a backup off of an external hard drive. Everything seems to be working fine; it recreated accurately all of my software and data, including iPhoto and iTunes, the pictures and songs (respectively) for which are stored on that hard drive, as opposed to being on the flash memory in the MacBook Air itself. However, I don’t recall if the start of the sync problem described herein started happening at the same time that I replaced the flash memory drive. All I know is that the computer is working perfectly in all respects and that even as the sync is failing, it at least says that it’s doing the right things and looking in the right places (e.g., the list of albums on my iPhone matches the list of albums in iTunes, etc.).
Settings/Status:
MacBook Air
OSX v. 10.9
iPhoto ’11 v. 9.5 (902.7)
iPhone iOS 7.0.4
iTunes v. 11.1.3 (8)
Summary Tab
Backups (This Computer)
Options
Automatically sync when this iPhone is connected
Sync only checked songs and videos
Photos Tab
Sync Photos from iPhoto (429 Photos)
Selected albums, Events, and Faces, and automatically include (no Events)
Albums – 9 are selected

You need to download iTunes on your computer. iOS 6 requires the latest version of iTunes which is 10.7.

Output requirement not being hit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for