Over 10mb issue

Hello,
trying to download a app but its says i have to connect to a wifi because its over 10mb? whys that? i have internet on my iphone why wont it download it using that connection?

This is a limit placed on the iPhone by Apple/AT&T and there is no way to get aroudn it except to download it over WiFi on the phone or at home on the computer.
For music, there is a 12MB size limit per track.

Similar Messages

Over MobileMe Issues

I am totally over mobileme issues yet I love iWeb. Can anyone recommend a good hosting site that is compatible with iWeb? How do I upload the site etc without using mobileme?

studentoflife wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good hosting site that is compatible with iWeb?
All hosting services should be compatible with iWeb — but if the hosting service offers a choice of WIndows servers or Linux servers, choose Linux.
Some recommend this hosting service — particularly for its support:
http://www.hostexcellence.com
studentoflife wrote:
How do I upload the site etc without using mobileme?
This video tutorial may help:
_Publishing your website via FTP_

" This items is over 10MB You must connect to a Wi-Fi network or use iTune

At some point in time, I tried to download an application. I received this message, "" This items is over 10MB You must connect to a Wi-Fi network or use iTunes on your computer to download this item." I have synched with iTunes numerous times and yet, I get this error message on my iPhone about 20 times or more per day. I've powered down and back up, synched yet nothing makes it go away. If you have had this experience and fixed it, please let me know your receipe for success as this is annoying.
Thank you!
Message was edited by: TexasMufasa

His question is not about trying to download >10M over 3G, it's about the constant message that keeps popping up.
TexasMufasa - If you can, delete the item from your computer and from your iPhone and then sync. It sounds like it's still trying to download it.
Also, I suggest a phone reset... press the home and sleep buttons until you see the Apple logo, ignoring the slider. Takes about 5-10 secs of button holding and you won't lose any data or settings. If this doesn't work, try a reset as explained in the manual... http://manuals.info.apple.com/enUS/iPhone_UserGuide.pdf

Going over 10MB limit

I have been with BT broadband Option 1 (10 MB) since June 2009 and have just received my first notice telling me that my use was over 10 MB in February and that I willl now be charged extra for this. My usage has been no more than usual. I rarely upload music or download films to watch and don't use I-player or YouTube. After receiving a warning on 16th February (I think it was) that I had already used up 7MB, I was even more careful with my usage and reduced the amount of time I was online and kept a daily check. However, at the end of last month, I was 1MB over. I'm not sure how this is worked out by BT or how I can check this myself but I consider myself to be a low user and am unable to understand how I could have gone over 10MB.
Seeing the other comments on here, I am beginning to wonder whether this is a ruse by BT to get people to move to their more expensive options or whether they are linking someone else's usage to my account. Maybe this is a case for Watchdog?
Any advice on how I can verify this or prove my usage to BT would be really helpful please.
Thanks,
Jane

Lipstickjane1 wrote:
I have been with BT broadband Option 1 (10 MB) since June 2009 and have just received my first notice telling me that my use was over 10 MB in February and that I willl now be charged extra for this. My usage has been no more than usual. I rarely upload music or download films to watch and don't use I-player or YouTube. After receiving a warning on 16th February (I think it was) that I had already used up 7MB, I was even more careful with my usage and reduced the amount of time I was online and kept a daily check. However, at the end of last month, I was 1MB over. I'm not sure how this is worked out by BT or how I can check this myself but I consider myself to be a low user and am unable to understand how I could have gone over 10MB.
Seeing the other comments on here, I am beginning to wonder whether this is a ruse by BT to get people to move to their more expensive options or whether they are linking someone else's usage to my account. Maybe this is a case for Watchdog?
Any advice on how I can verify this or prove my usage to BT would be really helpful please.
Thanks,
Jane
One way of checking your usage is by getting the upload/download information from your HomeHub and monitoring it on at least a daily basis. The following is an extract from another thread that you can read for further information.
http://community.bt.com/t5/Other-BB-Queries/Broadband-usage-OMG/m-p/434143#M16468
The process is not as difficult as it looks:
To monitor your usage with your HomeHub you first have to Login to your HomeHub.
There are various ways to get to your HomeHub but the simplest to describe is
1. Start your Internet Browser (say Internet Explorer)
2Type 192.168.1.254 in the address bar and hit enter.
3. If this is the first time you have done this you will be asked to change the default Admin password of the Hub.
   (Otherwise goto step 5)
The default Admin password is usually written on the Hub or supplied on a card or sticker supplied by BT.
NOTE this is Not the the wireless pin , or key, or password.
4. Make sure you record the new password.
5. Now click on Settings
6. You may be asked to type in your Admin Password.
7. When logged in successfuly click Advanced Settings   (Top Right end of second row)
8. Click "Coninue to advanced settings"
9 Click Broadband (Top left 2nd entry in second row)
10. The Internet entry on the third row should already be selected but if not click it.
11.   Under connection information you should see someting like this
   NOTE here that the data is recorded in GB (Gigabytes) not MB (Megabytes)
12.   IF you want to monitor your usage in detail I suggest you record the following information
date and time of reading, connection time, data transmitted, data received
For convenience I copy parts of my previous post.
There are several things you need to bear in mind.
1. BT usage is measured at midnight only and occasionally skips a night so check the date also.
2. The Home Hub measures usage seperately as up and down so you need to add the figures.
3. The Home Hub reading is accurate at the time of accessing it but will not update unless you refresh the screen.
4. The Home Hub reading measures from the last reconnection time so you need to check what the uptime of the connection is to ensure that a reconnection has not screwed up your reading.
5. The result of all this is that you need to record the readings on at least a daily basis and compare the difference between the two corresponding readings.
6. If you are experiencing unusual readings from the HomeHub you can monitor it on short periods of time (say hourly or less) and correlate with what is going on on connected devices.
7. A list of connected devices can also be got from the HomeHUb.
8. There are other ways of measuring usage per device but your case for proving to BT that their usage meter has got it wrong will be better served by using the advice above.
9. In my experience I have found that the Home Hub and BT usage meter agree and to my knowledge there has been no posts in this community that have posted convincing evidence otherwise in the form of Home Hub readings and BT Usage monitor readings (or any other readings). There has been posts of new account problems that may have been valid but none for existing accounts.

Creative in the dock over driver issues for older cards and upsetting consumers please read!

To Who this may concern at TOP LEVEL AT Creative's Board It's come to my attention to a very serious issue From Creative,and the story starts from here.
I have just required the Audigy 2 ZS Sound Card so looking to install the latest drivers from CREATIVE'S UK WEBSITE. So I look into the date which is 9/4/200 on Creative's website. However I did abit more investigating into the issues from other consumer's from passed half soaked drivers that Creative are supposed to put right with their half asleep development team(what a joke!!).
AS I did more research? on this issue on the forums and hardware websites, it came across to my attention on a Brazilian I. T. Expert called Daniel Kawakami (surprisesurprise and I don't suppose Creative know anything about him other than trying to kick him the balls for his work to help others with their sound cards very good PR work Creative well done!!!!).So armed with all this information and believe me I have gone into alot of reading in the forums about the issues,and yes Creative Board Of Directors you are entitled to your Copy Rights,for now !!!
So I find out more about this super hero Daniel Kawakami? to Creative's miss givings to put right the Drivers for Consumers let down by Creative, I came across one of the driver updates for the Audigy 2 ZS Sound Card done by Daniel Kawakami, and Bingo most consumer's now have a working drivers by him.
So for all the hard work and precious time this Daniel Kawakami has done for Creative Consumers(including me) YOU SELFISH CREATIVE BOARD OF DIRECTOR'S go and kick him the face, so I will say this to you what about his rights as a creative product consumer? ,his driver copy rights and on top that his right to put things right that your team cannot put right in the first place. This is the EXACT PEOPLE WE NEED IN THIS HIGHLY COMPLICATED IT INDUSTRY, so what do you do you try and do, you bin him.
So Creative I am going to ask some questions and I EXPECT YOU TO ANSWER THEM with me as a CONSUMER OF YOUR PRODUCTS(customer is King not you!!)
1. The drivers you realised on the 9th April 200 are working drivers for the Audigy 2 zs for windows 7 ultimate.
2. So how can you convince me that they are working?
3. At the moment I can only trust Daniel Kawakami's? working drivers, since he has had over whelming praise for his work.What makes me think I can trust you with your drivers.
4. Your Drivers came out on the 9/4/200, Daniel Kawakami's Drivers came out on 9/4/200 its too close a call,since your development Team are too lazy to put things right, how can you convince me that you did not copy his Drivers into your download Driver website(I would not be surprised if you did, as it would certainly be a cost cutting exercise ,and taking away his copy rights for all the work he has done for nothing!!!)
5. Are you going to treat customer and consumers better service and support? in the Future,and that includes me,and 3rd party developers like Daniel Kawakami .
The concussion to all of this, there are lessons to be learned by you Creative for your mis givings and the treatment of customers passed and present and especially the appalling treatment of Daniel Kawakami ,this guy deserves far better for his talent. I Have one message for the President Of Creative ,don't you EVER think you can scare me as a customer and also as Registered? disabled deaf person ,and for that reason I have far more powers you will ever have. For what I have read I am so angry and dismayed when someone like Daniel Kawakami is only trying help others ,but to be treated in this way.
It is only right for me to post this ,because You Creative have hurt? alot people and that includes me. I look forward to the comments and p.m.(if I get any) And Daniel Kawakami? I hope you do read this and all the best for the future ,keep doing what you do ,and once again Creative you should be holding your heads in Shame.
Regards Jonoace U.k.

!!! Creative jamais vai responder.
At seria justo se Creative viesse a publico falar de sua incapacidade e que at onde as placas Audigy funcionariam em Vista e ?7.
Mas por?incompet?ncia, pois nem suas novas placas funcionam direito, se era para vender est? mal.
Problemas de memoria superior a 4 gb e tantos outros que Creative no tem respostas;
Drivers de Daniel e Pax so alternativas, mas que tambm tem muitas limitaes.
Sinceramente acho que esta na hora de Creative vir a publico fazer um relato srio, e descrever claramente as limitaes de sua placas colocando um ponto final emexpectativas frustraes eeng dos.
Chega a ser vergonhoso que placas onboard como realtek funcionem melhor que placas Creative;
Realmente, antes era um sonho e orgulho possuir um produto CREATIVE, tornou-se um pesadelo e uma vergonha.
Mas enfim o que fazer, apenas esperar um momento de honestidade por parte de Creative.
Flavio Kern - Audigy 2 ZS
Creative will never respond. So it would be fair if Creative would publish his inability to speak and that even where the plates Audigy would work in Vista and 7. But by incompetence, since neither her new adapter works right, if it was to sell is poorly. Problems of memory above 4 gb, and so many others that Creative does not have answers; Daniel and Pax Drivers are alternati'ves, but which also has many limitations. I honestly think this time Creative come publico do a serious story, and describe clearly the limitations of your cards by putting an end-point on expectations, frustrations and forgeries. It is shameful that onboard realtek cards like that boards Creative work better; Actually, before it was a dream and pride have a CREATIVE product, became a nightmare and a shame. But anyway what to do, just wait a moment of honesty from Creative.
Flavio Kern-Audigy 2 ZS

HTTPS with Applet over Proxy Issue

An applet using HttpURLConnection within a Java Applet. The Connection is formulated as follows:
HttpURLConnection urlConn = (HttpURLConnection)destURL
.openConnection( );
urlConn.setDoOutput( true );
urlConn.setDoInput( true );
urlConn.setUseCaches( false );
urlConn.setAllowUserInteraction( false );
urlConn.setRequestProperty( "Content-type","multipart/form-data" );
urlConn.setRequestProperty( "Content-length","" + parameters.length( );This works fine with numerous proxy servers and other network
topologies, except one. The issue I am told occurs when we are trying to
connect over https. For background, my understanding is this causes the Java Plug-in to :
* invoke the http CONNECT command
* wait for the 200 OK indicating that the secure tunnel is established
* then send the request securely.
Doing a packet trace shows that the headers set in the code are
actually being included with the CONNECT. However the Java Plug
(1.4.2_06) does not sent the body with the CONNECT. I am told this
causes the proxy to wait for an entity that never arrives, because, on
the other end, the plug-in is waiting for 200 OK. After 8 secs the
plug-in resets the connection and fails.
Packet traces on other proxies show the same content-length header being
included, but they decide ignore it. From Googling I note some folks
claim that this is expected, because CONNECT is non-entity enclosing.
Doc's are scant on the CONNECT command. In some cases they seem to imply
that no data should go with the CONNECT (making it non-entity
enclosing), but later they state it supports data-pipelining, making the
content-length relevant, as the CONNECT may well contain an entity.
Moreover, is the intent of Applet Framework to insulate the programmer
from having to worry about issues like this? For example this Applet can
and does connect to a myriad of HTTP/1.1 or 1.0 server through a proxy
or not; in the case of no proxy or non secure proxy, the content-length
header is valid as the request goes out in one go with associated
headers. So writing the code as above, does not seem to be inherently
flawed, IMO. <-- And that is a question too :).
I note there is an isProxy() method, but this can only be determined
after connection (obviously) and parameters cannot be changed once the
connection is made. So creating a dummy connection first is possible I
suppose, but it seems a slippery slope to start coding for exceptions
like this, unless absolutely necessary.
On the face of it, it could be argued that this appears to be a bug in
the plug-in but with very little hits in google I am doubtful. To that
end, does anyone have any thoughts or experience with either working
around the problem (it would seem to be a pity to have to have a setting
per client), or whether in fact this proxy server is being too draconian
in its interpretation.
Thanks in advance,
Gary
Refs:
RFC2616
http://www.web-cache.com/Writings/Internet-Drafts/draft-luotonen-web-proxy-tunneling-01.txt

Pardon my ignorance about proxies, but how do you tell the plug-in that there is a proxy in between you and the destination?
The reason I ask is because with the https protocol, the first thing that happens is that an SSL connection is set up between the endpoints, and only after, through this secure tunnel, is the GET request or whatever sent. The proxy never gets to see any of the HTTP headers.

Mapi over HTTP issue

Hi all!
Hope somebody can help me out. In my test lab, where I`m experimenting with Exchange 2013 SP1 and Outlook 2013 SP1 I came across very annoying thing.
Let me explain a little bit more about config that worked.
Outlook 2013 connected to Exchange 2013 via RPC over HTTPS is working great actually really great. I have created my own certs and imported ROOT CA cert to all of my machines and things are working peachy. As part of my plans for 2014 I have to test and
deploy MAPI over HTTP sometime at the end of 2014 in our company (and migrate fromEX2007 but this is different story).
OK so I`ve enabled MAPI over HTTP on my test server and configured 5 virtual machines with different accounts to test things out. Started Outlooks, accepted "Your administrator has made change ....." prompts and here we go, I`m connected MAPI/HTTP
and all works really great.
Except for one thing. When it does connect, things are super fast and it works as it should. But sometimes it does not connect right away and it is sluggish in performance. Also Outlook is missing "Quick steps" menu, see attached image:
I restarted all servers, clients, clean Outlook install nothing helps.
When RPC/HTTPS I could quit and start Outlook 10 times and it worked 10/10 without problems.
When MAPI/HTTP I restart outlook and it works 6/10, so 4 times I get messed up Outlook and very poor performance.
Any idea where to start troubleshooting? Maybe Outlook has a bug or 2 with this mode?
Server is correctly sized and backed up by enough of memory and CPU, mailboxes have 100-3500 items in them.
Again, RPC/HTTPS works every time without any problem.
MAPI/HTTP works lets say 6 times without any prolem at all and really works great but 4 times out of 10 it makes me want to throw it away :)
If someone knows best way to troubleshoot this one, please let me know.
Regards,
G

Hi,
From your information, when Outlook hang on PC A, there was no problem to connect at the same time from computer B, so the client side related issue causing this problem is more likely. For
example, when Outlook was trying to connect to Exchange server, it fails due to the temporary Network issue, or it hang when loading something. As far as I know, it may also be caused by the local OST file. But it is difficult to do troubleshooting since there
could be many possible causes and more logs may be required to do troubleshooting.
Please try to run Outlook in safe mode by running "Outlook.exe /safe", see if we can reproduce this issue.
Thanks
Jessie

Buttons over Video issue

I have 2 buttons over the video which I use to control which audio track is playing. This works fine on a computer (Apple's DVD Player and PowerDVD) but doesn't work on a stand alone DVD player. I'm new to using buttons in the subtitle stream so I'm not sure if this is a common issue or not (and I did try to search the forum).

I figured out the problem so I'll wrap up the thread in case someone else runs into this problem...
I was using dvdSP's ability to "offset" the overlay file in order to make my highlights match up perfectly. For some reason if the offset differs from one overlay to the next in the same subtitle stream, it causes apple dvd player to crash.
example:
(all motion menus were created on one track with BOV & then separated into stories for easy targeting)
subtile(BOV) 1 had an overlay file offset to 0x & -4y & subtitle(BOV)2, my second menu, had an overlay file offset to 3x & -1y.
The first one would play fine, but as soon as apple dvd player detected the next subtitle it would crash. I solved the problem by editing my overlay files in photoshop to compensate for the offsets & leaving the offset in DVDSP untouched. weird... but it works now.

Bus over wifi issue

Hi
I'm looking for some advice for a ln issue I've just started having with my torch. I can use Bis over the mobile network but not over wifi. I have tried wifi at different locations but no luck. I've registered my phone on the blackberry network, I've tried service books but again makes no difference. I can use wifi to browse the Internet etc just not Bis. O2 are proving zero help as its a wifi issue, is there a way to contact blackberry directly?
Many thanks

Hi and Welcome to the Community!
I've read some things recently about O2 changing their service offerings and perhaps removing BIS access via WiFi. I cannot recall for sure, but you should get them to confirm if indeed you should even be able to do as you are attempting.
O2 has, however, fobbed you off...you PAY them for 100% of your services and 100% of your formal support...they are delivering neither to you right now. They have the ability to escalate cases that they cannot resolve into RIM...end users have no other free path by which to receive any formal support from RIM.
Good luck!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Enums over IIOP issue

When trying to serialize java5 enum types over iiop (e.g. using the wlogic.jar client), you'll get a Mismatched serialization UIDs-exception (tested with WLS 10.3). This derives from a known bug or an omission in the java5 specification. There's a good description here, unfortunately in german only:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6277781
You can either use weblogic.jar to avoid IIOP or overwrite the default serializer class as a workaround. But I would like to know if the issue is already adressed at Oracle and if there will be a fix in the near future.
Regards,
Thomas

No information on this issue?

DHCP Requests over Nexus Issue

Hello all, this is my first post so please be gentle. I am having an issue with DHCP requests on our new server network.
First some background:
The new network consists of 2x Nexus 5548UP runing NX-OS 6.0. Behind the N5ks are multiple FEX types, but for the purpose of this issue I am using 2232TM-E FEXs. Each FEX is setup in an active-active scenario, therefore each individual FEX port belongs to each N5k which are configured identically. The N5k have a vPC peer-link setup between them and each FEX is also setup with vPC. The N5ks are uplinked to a pair of Catalyst 4500X switches that function as our "core" switches. From there, we have our old network which consists of a pair of Catalyst 4507R switches. We use tansfer networks between the N5k and 4500X and between the 4500X and 4507R runing EIGRP.
I have "Server A" on VLAN 100 connected to FEX 2232TM-E... "DHCP Server B" is on VLAN 11 connected to 4507R. I have "ip dhcp relay address x.x.x.x" configured on VLAN 100 to point to DHCP Server B on the old network. VLAN 100 is configured with HSRP (see running-config output below).
Onto the issue:
Server A is not getting a DHCP addesses assigned to him. The DHCP Server B gets the Discover packet from Server A and sends back the Offer... but the Offer either never makes it to Server A, or Server A Request never makes it back the DHCP Server B. I am not sure which is the case exactly.
I know it may be hard to picture the whole scenario I described above, but any pointers would be greatly appreciated. I'll be glad to dig up a good diagram of the network or provide more configs if necessary.
Additional info:
version 6.0(2)N1(2)
feature dhcp
service dhcp
ip dhcp relay
N5k #1:
interface Vlan100
   description server vlan
   no shutdown
   no ip redirects
   ip address 10.112.100.2/23
   hsrp 100
     authentication text hsrp-100
     preempt delay minimum 180
     priority 200
     ip 10.112.100.1
   ip dhcp relay address 172.26.20.40
N5k #2:
interface Vlan100
   description server vlan
   no shutdown
   no ip redirects
   ip address 10.112.100.3/23
   hsrp 100
     authentication text hsrp-100
     preempt delay minimum 180
     priority 150
     ip 10.112.100.1
   ip dhcp relay address 172.26.20.40
Thanks for any information!

Here are the results of a tracert from a server in VLAN 11 to the gateway for VLAN 100:
K:\>tracert -d 10.112.100.1
Tracing route to 10.112.100.1 over a maximum of 30 hops
   1    1 ms    1 ms    <1 ms 172.26.20.243
   2    <1 ms    7 ms    4 ms 10.112.96.105
   3    <1 ms    2 ms    2 ms 10.112.100.1
Trace complete.
Here is a tracert from a server in VLAN 100 (staticly addressed) to the gateway for VLAN 11:
K:\>tracert -d 172.26.20.1
Tracing route to 172.26.20.1 over a maximum of 30 hops
   1    <1 ms    2 ms    2 ms 10.112.100.3
   2    <1 ms    6 ms    7 ms 10.112.96.73
   3    1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms 172.26.20.1
Trace complete.
Does this help? Or do you need more specific switch config information?
Also, I've attached a basic drawing of the network for reference. I've ommitted all the IP information, just a visual representation of the connectivity.

Over air issues!

So I have read everything I can...followed instructions from the mobile me status updates...even went to the mac store yesterday and flashed my pro care card to get some tech advise...and still I cannot get the "cloud" to do over air syncing of my calendar and contacts. Mac store guy said Mobile Me was not working yesterday and to keep trying turning the sliders on to see if it works...still nothing. Just wondering if anyone else has the issue and any other fixes up their sleeves!

I should ask for a new phone. You're still in the 14 days limit, whitch is used in most countries for replacement. It could also be network issues, switching from 3g to gprs.
‡Thank you for hitting the Blue/Green Star button‡
N8-00 RM 596 V:111.030.0609; E71-1(05) RM 346 V: 500.21.009

Voice Over Wifi Issue: random service interruption

Hello,
I have implemented a Voice over Wifi solution based on WLC 4404, AIR-LAP 1131G and CP-7921G. The Security mode deployed is WPA PSK. I have a random interruption on wireless access witch cause the CP 7921G to lose connectivity to the CUCM, even if the Phone is near to the AP and does not move. What can be the cause of the problem. Thank you in advance.
Best Regards
Houichi Nizar

Hi,
we are experiencing the same issues.
The VoWifi design guides (i.e. TPC, DCA, Media, EDCA, WMM, QoS) have been followed setting up the Controllers.
Tested WLC4402 / WLC4404 with firmware versions 4.2.207 and 7.0.116.
Experiencing the issues on 7921G (firmware 1.3.4SR1) and 7925G phones (firmware 1.3.4SR2 and 1.4.1SR1).
The access points used are 1242G with a mix of AIR-ANT1728 and AIR-ANT24020V-R diversity antennas.
It is a warehouse environment. Phones are very near to access points.
We only use 802.11b/g for wireless phones and data clients.
The only issue I found is the cell size which is small and AP transmit power is low.
Auto RF and Auto DCA is enabled. AP power levels are 5, 6 or even 7 in areas with a lot of access points.
We have a high density b/g clients on some areas in the warehouse and added some access points to seperate the AP load.
Kind regards,
Rob Vreede.

VPN over Internet Issues

I have a Mac OS X Server with VPN (L2TP and PTP) enabled. I am able to connect to the VPN service from my iMac (I also tried another computer) from within my LAN, but VPN over LAN isn't very useful, of course.
The problem is, I cannot connect to the VPN by typing in my public IP (with the rest of the settings the same) instead of the private IP. I've enabled port forwarding for UDP 1701, 4500, and 500, and TCP 1723. I also tried making my Mac OS X Server machine (a Mac Mini) a DMZ host, and that didn't work. I turned my router's firewall off, too.
So if I can connect to my VPN locally but not over the Internet even though I've enabled a DMZ host, which shouldn't fail, some setting must be wrong somewhere. Does anyone know what it could be?
By the way, the Mini is on WiFi for now (we recently got it and haven't set up a place for it yet).

Jeff: Sorry to sound inexperienced, but I can't find a VPN or network related log in Console. Which one is it? Anyway, I doubt that it's the connection settings but something with my router. I know all routers are different, but I was wondering if there was some generic problem with VPN and routers. Strangely enough, my other services work on the server (HTTP, AFP, SSH, VNC) by port forwarding. Again, DMZ hosting did NOT solve the problem, so I'm guessing that there's more to do if you want VPN???
Basically (to anyone), my VPN works fine over the network, so my settings must be correct, and I am almost sure that when I connect over the internet, the request does not even touch my server.
As for the other reply: I've forwarded the same ports and made my server's IP static like in the thread. The only difference is that DD-WRT firmware. Was that the final solution?
P.S. My server is temporarily down (due to some nasty irrepairable permissions issues) as I reinstall Mac OS X, so I can't really test anything on the server until it's up.
Message was edited by: Mac OS 9000

Time Capsule & Xbox 360 over ethernet issues

I have a Time Capsule connected to my modem, I can access the internet over WiFi on my mac without issues, however when I connect my Xbox 360 to the router via ethernet it will not allow me to connect to Xbox live. What's highly frustrating is that it passes all test apart from the ICMP one. According to some forums, if your receive this then your router is not compatible with xbox live. However this contradicts people being able to connect through their TC on other posts. I can connect to xbox live if I directly plug it into my modem, so it is not anything todo with that side of things.
Is there any reason why this might be on my TC and how might I go about sorting this problem out?
Any help much appreciated
Matt

Although I also haven't been able to get it working over Wi-Fi yet, I've got it working pretty happily over what is ostensibly ethernet (powerline networking ftw).
My guess is that the problem you're having is due to your Time Capsule ignoring stuff (as a security measure) that Xbox Live is sending the Xbox, so what I think you need to do is tell your Time Capsule to stop doing that for the Xbox. You do that by getting your Time Capsule to give the Xbox the same IP address every time it connects, and to not block anything sent to that IP address.
First we need to get the Xbox's MAC address, which you can find either on the back of the Xbox itself, or by going to the System blade on the Xbox Dashboard, selecting Network Settings, Edit Settings, Additional Settings (push the left thumbstick to the right), Advanced Settings, then the MAC address should be displayed.
Just to be clear, a MAC address has nothing to do with Apple's computers, standing for Media Access Control, and is a quasi-unique code that nearly every network adapter has. We're using it here so your Time Capsule can recognise the Xbox.
Now you've got the MAC address, open AirPort Utility, select your Time Capsule and click Manual Settings, the Internet toolbar icon, then the DHCP tab. Click the plus button under the DHCP Reservations box, type Xbox 360 (or whatever you want) as the description, and click Continue. Now type the Xbox's MAC address into the MAC Address box, then click the IPv4 box, change the last number from 2 to 35 (so it's something like 10.0.1.35), and click Done.
Now we have the Xbox getting the same IP from the Time Capsule, we need to tell the Time Capsule to stop filtering stuff that's sent to that IP, to do that, click the NAT tab (inside the Internet section), then "Enable default host at:" and enter 35 as the last two digits (so it matches up with the IP address we put in the IPv4 box earlier). Finally, click Update, and when your Time Capsule has finished restarting, try the connection test on the Xbox again.

Over 10mb issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for