Overhead per tonnes

Hi all
Can anyone give me the sample code for the report OVEHEAD PER TONNES.You can also mail me to
[email protected]
Vijay

How are you doing the redirect? If you send a Location header (301 or 302), Firefox should request the new page immediately, but if you use a meta tag or script in the page, Firefox has to process the page first and the time will depend on lots of different things.

Similar Messages

How to configure QTY per TON overhead rate for Output material

Hi,
Kindly advice me how to configure Per TON overhead rate on Output material?
Thanks
Supriya

Hi Supriya,
Whethere the system is calculating Overhead on the basis of Input Raw Materials or on the basis of Output Materials, completely depends on the Cost Element what you assign in the "Base Row".
If it is to be on Qty Consumption of Raw Materials, then, you need to assign the RM Consumption GL Account in the Base Row. If it is to be on the Output Quantity produced, you need to assign the GL which you created for External Settlement (22 category).
*Note: SAP only accounts for input materials and activities with units of quantity for quantity-based overhead that are updated in CO. Assigning the Output Qty GL will help you only for Actual Overhead calculation.*
Pls revert back for further explanation...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Activity Price per TON

Hi,
Is it possible to maintain the activity price perio TON instead of machine hours or Labour hours or Set up.
if it is possible,kindly adivce me how to Maintain Activity type per TON.
Thanks
Sunitha

Hi, Sunitha,
Of course you can use any unit of measure, and you can use your-self defined unit of measure for the activity measure. e.g. some transportation department use the Kilometre for its activity type.
Usually the activity type is by time is due to the time is reasonable for labor or machine's cost allocation. Each activity type price is independent to products, so the more time processed to a product, the more cost should be charged to the product. And the time is easy for collection both for plan or actual.

Shipment cost per ton

HI,
My user requirement is to see shipment cost per ton at present we are using shipment cost as total amount for the shipment
How to achieve this what are the settings we have to do in condition background.
Your reply is most valuable
Regards,
MH

Dear Mohammed,
What is the unit of measure for the material? is it TON? Are you maintaining the weight at the sales order level?
if you are using the UOM as ton then u can change the freight condition type to quantity from Fixed amount. This will solve the issue.
If you are using a different UOM for sales and weight is maintained at the sales order or delivery level then change the frieght condition type from fixed amount to weight or use any condition type which calculates based on the weight.
Fized amount is normally at the shipment cost item level and Ton should always be at the delivery item level. So change the shipment item category on how exactly the cost needs to be distributed.
Please revert for any further clarification.
Thanks and Regards,
Pavan P.

VAT @ Rs.14 per ton (Set Off) - Non-Cenvat Input

Hi,
We want to maintain below VAT in Rupees instead of percentage for the
line items of Purchase order for Rajasthan state.
1) VAT @ Rs.14 per ton (Set Off) - Non-Cenvat Input
2) VAT @ @ Rs.168 per truck (Set Off) - Non-Cenvat Input
Kindly let us know how it can be configure in system & these are Deductible and we are into TAXINJ procedure, R/3 4.6C.
regards,
Dhananjayaa

Hi,
check following path
in SPRO-Gene rel-Logistic-ax on goods Movement-India-BASIC SETTING-DETERMINATION OF EXCISE DUTY-CONDITION BASE EXCISE DETERMINATION-CLASSIFY CONDITION TYPE
here check your Vat and CSt condition type is there or not,it should be there .
Regards
Kailas ugale

Rate per Ton and per KM

Hi Team,
I want to build the condition record based on two calculation types (Quantity and Distance) for Freight.
I have tried to use scale option, but it was not meet my requirement.
Request team to provide your views / suggestion to achieve this.
E.g:
Condition master shod like as below
Material
Amount
UNIT
Per
UOM
Per
UoM2
xyz
1
INR
1
To
1
KM
If the Shipment Cost is processed for 10 Tones and Shipment have the distance of 100 KM
The result should I get is = 1000 INR (1*10*100)
Thanks
R Dhana

Yes I think, it is possible with Multi Dimensional as your Calculation Type. For more information on this, have a look at the following note:-
Note 751826 - Information: Using multidimensional freight conditions
G. Lakshmipathi

ZFS - CPU overhead per volume

Is there any information available on ZFS as to how much cpu overhead is created with a small number of large volumes as opposed to larger number of small volumes in a RaidZ configuration? An example might be 5 x 20GB volumes as opposed to 10 x 10GB volumes. How much more CPU overhead would be incurred with the 10 x 10GB instance?

I don't know any reason why there would be a significant difference between those situations.
For reasons other than CPU, it is recommended to keep raidz stripes to under 10 columns. 5x20G should be fine.
Darren

Firefox overhead per redirect

Hi,
I have a website which does multiple redirects. I have measure the network and server overhead for them - but these dont add up to the User perceived time. Does any one know what is the overhead due to firefox for a redirect. I hope i am asking question in the right forum!
Thanks
Santhosh

How are you doing the redirect? If you send a Location header (301 or 302), Firefox should request the new page immediately, but if you use a meta tag or script in the page, Firefox has to process the page first and the time will depend on lots of different things.

Fixed base overhead calculation on output quantity

Dear Guru's
I want to calculate the overhead @ fixed rate on the basis of output quantity of finished goods.
For the said purpose, I am using quantity based overhead calculation in SPRO. The overhead rate "C110" is being used with dependency D010 (Overhead Type/Overhead Key). Here i have maintained the fixed amount per tonne basis with overhead key "SAP1".
I have maintained the overhead key SAP1 in material master's. But still it's not calculating and not displaying anything in the line items. Also to my surprise, no error is displayed at the time of production order and standard cost estimate.
Please help me on the above issue.
A detailed help stating what possible errors I may have done would be helpful.
Thanks,
Sumit

Hi
Lets assume you choose Output (KG) to absorb the overhead
1. You need to create an Activity Type called PRDOVH and assign it in the PP Work center... Assign the cost element of this act type to a separate cost component in OKTZ
2. While creating the Routing, the Activity Qty = Operation Qty for this Act Type... i.e. If you are creating routing for 100 Units, specify the Act Qty for PRDOVH as 100...
3. The Formula in the work center will be fully variable for this Act Type.. i.e. the Act Qty should change in proportion to the Qty Confirmed....
4. The PP Guys will confirm the operation in PP... This Act Type will also get confirmed along with it
5. Now calculate Act Price KSII as usual and run revaluation... From this point onwards, follow the normla procedure which you follow in month end
br, Ajay M

Which table contains total labor per cost center?

hi..
from which table can i fetch cost center..
total hours per cost center?
total labor per cost center?
total overhead per cost center??

Hello,
CSKS : KOSTL :-Cost Center
Regards,
Deepu.K

Complex Product Costing Scenario- Separate overhead rates to same material

Hello- I have a strangely complex scenario at my current client.
They wish to apply different overhead rates to the same raw material (one material number in SAP) which is a part of two different BOMs to the same Semi-Finished product (one material number in SAP). This semi-finished product needs to be costed 2 different ways with 2 different BOMs, routings and overhead rates and then i need to use mixed costing to come up with a blended rolled-up cost to update in the material master of the semi-finished product. I am able to get past all challenges but the only open item is to be able to apply different overhead rates to the same material.
Limitations:
1- We have to use Standard price, not moving average.
2- Split valuation idea thrown out the window.
3- Using 2 different material numbers for the raw materials thrown out of the window.
4- Business area idea thrown out of the window.
basically, coming back to the original issue at hand, the challenge is to be able to apply different overhead rates to one material number in SAP.

Hi
There are available,, But you have thrown them out of the window already
I believe you need to rampup your overhead absorption mechanism... if ovh is dependant on the component, then it should remain fixed/.. however, if it is getting changed bsaed on the parent material, then driver is not the component, but the Parent material
hence, your overhead should be based on Parent material... Assign an overhead group to the Parent material say, 100 and 110 to the 2 Parent materials.... Now you maintain separate % of overhead per overhead group.... BASE would be the raw material consumption cost element
@ Subodh: Do you think above suggestion will work?? I think exit need not be used if I have understood his requirement clear
br, Ajay M

Overhead Rates Maintenance in DEV,QAS & PRD Systems

Hello All,
I need your expert advice on this topic. "What is the best practice to maintain OH rates in SAP Systems across the landscape". Any link to document, whitepaper or knowledge link is very welcome.
I am aware that it can be maintained after making the system modifiable. But being a basis guy, i am against this method and am on the look out for the best process to do it.
Points will be awarded for sure for worthy answers.
Best Regards,
Sri

Hi,
To define the overhead method, choose:
Period-end closing->Single functions->Accrual calculation->Extras ® Settings->Percentage method, or
Planning->Planning aids->Accrual calculation->Extras->Settings->Percentage method
Using the overhead structure display for the given controlling area, you can maintain, create, or call up information on accrual calculations for selected objects.
To do so, choose one of the following objects either by double-clicking on it or by choosing Goto from the menu:
Base (basis for calculation): You specify the base cost elements that are to be assigned overhead per controlling area. Choose Where-used list->Overhead structure or Controlling area to display whether and where the base cost element assignments exist.
O/H rate (overhead rates): Determines plan and actual overhead rate percentages for each controlling area applying to a particular validity period. On the overhead list screen, the Assignments indicator shows whether individual overhead rates exist.
To check the assignment of the current object (calculation base, overhead rate, or credit) and to display the assignments per controlling area, per overhead structure and the structures not used, when maintaining the above-mentioned accrual data, choose Where-used list-> Overhead structures or Controlling area (see: Where-Used List for Accrual Calculations).
Controlling->Cost Center Accounting-> Planning->Planning Aids->Accrual Calculation-> Percentage Method->Maintain Overhead Structure.
- Actual Postings->Period-End Closing->Accrual Calculation->Percentage Method-> Maintain Overhead Structure.
Save your entries.
Hope this helps you.
Rgds
Manish

Report requiring per unit cost

Hi,
Is there any standard report in SAP showing per tonne cost if unit of measurement is tonnes or per hour cost. I need the report showing the cost per tonnes for all the expenses. Please reply immediately.

What tyoe of production process you have?
In any costing report KKF6n or in COo2 you have a costing base (value base)
Absolute or per unit cost
If you choose Absolute, then system will show the full cost of the product and if you choose per unit, thne system will show per unit cost of the product.
please come back

Associative array comparison and INSERT upon IF condition

Hi Guys,
I have written this pl sql code to identify non existing sellers and insert their sales channel information into the dimension table (dimensional table update).
Somehow,......nothing is inserted and this script runs for 12 hours+ without any result. the sql autotrace shows no result and the explain plan (button on sql developer throws upon clicking "missing keyword". I have no
information what is going on/wrong. Does anyone spot an error?
UNDEFINE DimSales;
UNDEFINE FactTable;
DEFINE DimSales = 'testsales';
DEFINE FactTable = 'testfact';
DECLARE
v_SellerNo VarChar(9);
v_error_code T_ERRORS.v_error_code%TYPE;
v_error_message T_ERRORS.v_error_message%TYPE;
TYPE assoc_array_str_type1 IS TABLE OF VARCHAR2(32) INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
v1 assoc_array_str_type1;
TYPE assoc_array_str_type2 IS TABLE OF VARCHAR2(32) INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
v2 assoc_array_str_type2;
BEGIN
--Collect all distinct SellerNo into associative array (hash table)
select distinct SellerNo bulk collect into v1 from &FactTable;
select distinct seller_id bulk collect into v2 from &DimSales;
v_SellerNo := v1.first;
loop
exit when v1 is null;
--1 Check if v_SellerNo already exists in DIM_Sales (if NOT/FALSE, its a new seller and we can insert all records for that seller
if (v2.exists(v_SellerNo)=false) THEN
INSERT INTO &DimSales (K_Sales,REG,BVL,DS, VS,RS,GS,VK)
(SELECT DISTINCT trim(leading '0' from RS||GS) ,REG BVL,DS,VS,RS,GS,VK from &FactTable where SellerNo =v_SellerNo);
--ELSE
end if;
v_SellerNo := v1.next(v_SellerNo);
end loop;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
ROLLBACK;
--v_error_code := SQLCODE
--v_error_message := SQLERRM
--INSERT INTO t_errors VALUES ( v_error_code, v_error_message);
END;
---------------------------------------------------------------

Distinct clause requires a sort. Sorts can be very expensive.
Bulk collects that are not constrained in fetch size, can potentially fetch millions of rows - requiring that data to be wholly read into server memory. I have seen how this can degrade performance so badly that the kernel reboots the server.
Using PL/SQL loops to process and insert/update/delete data is often problematic due to its row-by-row approach - also called slow-by-slow approach. It is far more scalable letting SQL do the "loop" processing, by using joins, sub-selects and so on.
Where the conditional processing is too complex for SQL to handle, then PL/SQL is obviously an alternative to use. Ideally one should process data sets as oppose to rows in PL//SQL. Reduce context switching by using bulk fetches and bulk binds.
But PL/SQL cannot execute in parallel as the SQL it fires off can. If after all the optimisation, the PL/SQL process still needs to hit a million rows to process, it will be slow irrespective of how optimal that PL/SQL approach and design - simply because of the number of rows and the processing overheads per row.
In that case, the PL/SQL code itself need to be parallelised. There are a number of ways to approach this problem - the typical one is to create unique and distinct ranges of rows to process, spawn multiple P/SQL processes, and provide each with a unique range of rows to process. In parallel.
So you need to look close at what you are trying to achieve, what the workloads are, and how to effectively decrease the workloads and increase the processing time of a workload.
For example - finding distinct column values. You can pay for that workload when wanting that distinct list. And each time afterward repeat that workload when wanting that distinct list. Or you can pay for that workload up-front with the DML that creates/updates those values - and use (for example) a materialised view to maintain a ready to use distinct list of values.
Same workload in essence - but paying once for it and up-front as oppose to each time you execute your code that needs to dynamically build that distinct list.
Kent Crotty did tests and showed stunning performance improvements with bulk collect and forall, up to 30x faster:Bulk processing is not a magical silver bullet. It is a tool. And when correctly use, the tool does exactly what it was designed to do.
The problem is using a hammer to drive in screws - instead of a screwdriver. There's nothing "stunning" about using a screwdriver. It is all about using the correct tool.
If the goal of the swap daemon is to free up "idle" chunks of memory, and try to use that memory for things like file cache instead, what does that have to do with bulk processing?The swap daemon reads virtual memory pages from swap space into memory, and writes virtual pages from memory to swap space.
What does it have to do with bulk processing? A bulk fetch reads data from the SGA (buffer cache) into the PGA (private process memory space). The larget the fetch, the more memory is required. If for example 50% of server memory is required for a bulk collection that is 2GB in size, then that will force in-use pages from memory to swap space.. only to be swapped back again as it is needed, thereby forcing other in-use pages to swap. The swap daemon will consume almost all the CPU time swapping hot pages continually in and out of memory.

Hide grand total field on ALV report, But keep the sub total fields

Dear Experts,
1) How to hide grand total field on ALV report, But keep the sub total fields.
2) How to populate rate per ton & calculate total price according to the qty in delivering document.

Dear Experts,
1) How to hide grand total field on ALV report, But keep the sub total fields.
2) How to populate rate per ton & calculate total price according to the qty in delivering document.

Overhead per tonnes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for