Overload-Problem

Hey,
I just try to get through the Programmers Exam and found an error while overloading, that I can't understand.
Here is the code:
class A
public void test1(int a) { System.out.println("test1, integer");}
public void test1(float a) { System.out.println("test1, float");}
public void test2(int a) { System.out.println("test2, integer");}
public class OverloadTest extends A{
public OverloadTest() {
public static void main(String[] args)
int a=5;
OverloadTest ow=new OverloadTest();
ow.test1(a);
ow.test2(a); // Error at compile time
public void test2(float a) { System.out.println("test2, float");}
This produces following error at compile-time:
OverloadTest.java [19:1] reference to test2 is ambiguous, both method test2(int) in A and method test2(float) in OverloadTest match
ow.test2(a); // Error at compile time
I have the same overloaded methods test1 and test2. In the first case this is done in class A alone, in the second case in class A and OverloadTest.
What is the problem here ??
Why does the integer variable 'a' match both test2 methods ? ( I know that there is an implizit cast possible from int to float, but why does the compiler try this when he finds a perfect matching method in test2(int) ?)
The compiler does not have any problems with test1, which should be the same.
Anyone having an idear ?
Best regards
Markus

Approximately because each requires the same number of steps to get to it.
ow.test1(a) => A.test2(int a)
...Convert ow to A
ow.test1(a) => OW.test2(float a)
...Convert a to float
The precise answer requires that you break down which method would be used by going through the JLS step by step.
This thread provides an example which is fairly close to yours and the break down that I did of it. (The thread is probably cached so give it time to load.)
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=31&thread=159240
Let me emphasize that going through the break down is very interesting. However, it is not something that I am going to repeat more than once, so you will need to proceed with your own analysis.

Similar Messages

  • Judging System Performance ... (was System Overload Problem...)

    In a previous thread (was System Overload Problem...) ... I encountered system overload errors as described, while the system performance monitor showed almost no usage for either the disk I/O or the audio monitors.
    I was just using some audio Instruments and a few plug-in's ( as was listed in the previous thread) ...
    Question: So, and I missing something, or - how can we actually judge the system performance related to actual CPU usage? It seems as though there should be a third column ...
    - 1 for disk I/O
    - 1 for audio
    - 1 for CPU
    I would appreciate any insights on this matter.

    If you do a search for '10010' (also other 1001x errors) or 'error' you'll find plenty of threads of people with the same errors without good reason for the error's description-sometimes it is a driver conflict but the error returned is system overload. These errors are not always indicative of what actually caused the problem.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=765043&#765043
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=766671&#766671
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=762124&#762124
    And there are many little prefs, processes or actions which may trigger it. Many of them go unresolved.

  • System Overload problem, Cant make sense of help I've been given

    Hey guys, I picked up a cheap version of Logic through my school just over two years ago. I've always used its most simplistic functions for making rough recordings of my band, but over the last 6 months I've been getting into production a lot more. As I got more into using MIDI and Plugins, my system overload problem got worse and worse. Its now at the point where I get an overload literally every two bars of music. Through this support page http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3161 I worked out my problem is that one core of my processor is having to do literally everything.
    My knowledge of logics functions is not indepth in the slightest, and I absolutely cannot make sense of the instructions on this page. I dont have an Output 1-2 track, or an Aux 1 / Aux 2 track in my mixer. Moreover I just can't work out what this page is trying to tell me to do to balance the activity between cores.
    If anyone could break the process down into a really simple, laymans terms step by step of what I do, I'd be extremely greatful. Sorry to sound dense but I really have no clue what that support page is telling me to do ha
    Cheers!
    PS running on a 2.4Ghz Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM, plenty of Hard Disk space free.

    It'll make a bit more sense when you realise that the aux tracks will apear automatically in the mix window once you send something to an aux via a channel.

  • Overload problems in Logic 8

    I'm on a G5 2.0Ghz with 12Gb Ram, but Logic seems to lock up all the time with overloads on only one core. Sounds quickly become crackly as the core overloads, but the other core hardly shows any activity.
    I have tried all kinds of different configurations of settings, followed all the standard advice for buffer settings, ticking and unticking all the options.
    I'm using a Tascam FW-1804 interface which Tascam assure me is fine in Leopard.
    Is this a problem with Logic misreporting CPU activity? Or is one core really overloading while the other remains largely dormant?
    Are there some specific settings im missing that is required when using a non intel G5?
    Thanks in advance!
    Bob

    Here's a great article about how Logic distributes processing power over multiple cores. Some useful info on how to balance out loads:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3161
    And make sure I/O Safety Buffer box is OFF.
    Good Luck!

  • Single core overload problem

    Sorry folks, another CPU overload complaint. I'm having crazy overloads which seem to be specific to core 2 of my G5 2.0 GHz Dual core processor. Core 2 will max out resulting in crackling audio when simply playing chords on one soft synth. I have experimented with different synths, but the problem still seems inherent although the severity seems to fluctuate depending on the synth used. Core 1 often lies idle while core 2 is going nuts and overloading. Changing some tracks to different busses seems to do nothing to change the distribution of processing to the other core.
    This problem is rendering my rig almost unusable, because as soon as i introduce more instruments/tracks into the mix, it just completely maxes out and dies.
    I am running 12Gb Ram, so it's definitely not that which is causing issues. Running Motu Ultralite interface, which is apparently fairly robust.
    Can anyone make any suggestions? I've tried a lot of other answers on this forum to similar issues, all to no avail.
    Any help will be VERY much appreciated!
    Thanks
    Bob

    there is an instrument that is already recorded?
    Maybe Kontakt? (does not support multicore)
    Please give me more info about the Software instruments
    if you don't want that... try to freeze all heavy 3rd party plugins... some of them does not support freeze (Omnisphere sometimes..not always)... if you enconter problem with an instrumen try to bounce it as audio in real time!
    SOLO MODE MUST BE SET AS
    this allow you to bounce SOLO tracks and Savings CPU power!
    Somtime i forget this very good function but this is the Logic 7 setting!!!
    I'm a old school Logic user
    I always set as Saving CPU... this is a great feature...
    ONLY LOGIC can do that!
    I use Logic 8 without use new features... Logic 7 was better...
    That is why on my machines LP8 is Rock Solid!!!
    LP8 sounds better tha lp7... of course
    G

  • Artsd giving me 'CPU overload' problem.

    Hello everybody,
    I've just installed Arch Linux, along with X, KDE, and the like. Now, when I boot into KDE, I get this error message saying "Sound server fatal error: cpu overload, aborting".
    The error message appears in an artsmessage window.
    My computer becomes very slow before I get this error as artsd uses 99% of cpu before it crashes. I found this out using the `top` command.
    I have alsa and all of it's modules compiled. The alsa module is also inserted into DAEMONS array.
    So.. what does one do in this situation? Thanks.

    I just tried that. The utility tells me everything is good.
    So I decide to try something new. I log in as root and start KDE. Artsd doesn't crash anymore, and it only eats up half of my CPU.
    top - 00:34:26 up 14 min, 1 user, load average: 2.94, 2.56, 1.38
    Tasks: 80 total, 3 running, 77 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
    Cpu(s): 74.7% us, 25.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 0.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
    Mem: 739740k total, 350724k used, 389016k free, 54072k buffers
    Swap: 987956k total, 0k used, 987956k free, 192836k cached
    PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
    10466 root 25 0 1796 984 780 R 43.3 0.1 1:48.52 top
    9400 jeezus84 25 0 10460 6040 4052 R 41.6 0.8 5:22.37 artsd
    12407 root 15 -1 151m 19m 2580 S 2.0 2.8 0:04.58 X
    12659 root 15 0 30176 15m 11m S 2.0 2.1 0:00.57 konsole
    1 root 16 0 1388 504 444 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.85 init
    2 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0
    3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0
    I get a new window that pops up now, as soon as I log into KDE as root.
    It's another artsmessage window, but this one says:
    " Sound server informational message:
    Error while initializing the sound driver:
    device: default can't be opened for playback (Device or resource busy)
    The sound server will continue, using the null output device."
    So, i'm stumped. I was going to get rid of the arch installation of alsa, and reinstall from the files i find at the alsa website, but I can't remove alsa using Pacman because other programs need it.
    Any advice is greatly appreciated. Aside from this minor wrinkle, i'm thoroughly impressed with Arch Linux. Having used Gentoo before this, it's embodies everything I liked about Gentoo without any of the bloody compiling. Good show.

  • CPU overloading problem

    Hello everyone.
    I'm running Oracle 10 and Apache on the same machine. Recently the CPU load average became critical and I wonder is there a way to optimize Oracle/Apache performance. I have about 4000 visitors a day on the website and there seems to be no DDOS attacks or visitors' number increases.
    Can anyone please help me with an advice?
    Here are some figures...
    13:36:43 up 297 days, 6 min, 1 user, load average: 5.27, 5.69, 8.09
    346 processes: 339 sleeping, 7 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
    CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle
    total 87.8% 0.0% 7.8% 0.2% 1.3% 1.6% 1.0%
    cpu00 88.6% 0.0% 8.5% 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% 2.1%
    cpu01 85.7% 0.0% 9.5% 0.0% 1.1% 2.7% 0.7%
    cpu02 91.4% 0.0% 4.3% 0.9% 2.3% 0.1% 0.5%
    cpu03 85.5% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0% 1.5% 3.1% 0.5%
    Mem: 2061612k av, 2026372k used, 35240k free, 0k shrd, 6568k buff
    1455500k actv, 179304k in_d, 30584k in_c
    Swap: 2061604k av, 1030800k used, 1030804k free 325272k cached

    Hello, thanks for the reply.
    The top of the list looks like this:
    PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND
    7359 mysite 25 0 63604 15M 5784 R 17.9 0.7 0:04 2 httpd
    7364 mysite 23 0 63180 15M 5716 R 11.9 0.7 0:02 3 httpd
    2867 mysite 17 0 63020 12M 4924 R 9.6 0.6 0:07 1 httpd
    7366 oracle 24 0 59320 57M 57136 S 5.1 2.8 0:01 1 oracle
    7358 oracle 20 0 58096 55M 55916 S 4.0 2.7 0:00 2 oracle
    12 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.3 0.0 113:23 1 kscand
    7351 mysite 23 0 63404 15M 5784 S 0.3 0.7 0:02 0 httpd
    7236 mysite 16 0 1488 1488 912 R 0.2 0.0 0:00 0 top
    28 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.1 0.0 58:16 0 kjournald
    1 root 19 0 504 476 452 S 0.0 0.0 28:00 1 init
    2 root RT 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 migration/0
    3 root RT 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 migration/1
    4 root RT 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 2 migration/2
    5 root RT 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 3 migration/3
    6 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 3 keventd
    7 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 ksoftirqd/0
    8 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 ksoftirqd/1
    9 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 2 ksoftirqd/2
    10 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 3 ksoftirqd/3

  • Variable overloading problem - please help

    Hi
    I have a simple program that needs to read in a decimal OR octal OR hexadecimal number, calculate the result into a decimal value and spit it out to the user. However I am little concerned as to what type can I use so the user doesn't over load my variable. when I use long double (and then getting rid of the .x portion) it gives me an ugly out put, but when I use int, or long int I am fine until I have a 20digit number as an entry and then it craps out on me.. What should I do so I can take any number for example 123456789123456789123456789 and still not lose precision
    Thank you for your help

    should I do so I can take any number for example
    123456789123456789123456789 and still not lose
    precisionYou (and the user) must be prepared to lose precision if the number that is entered is too large.
    Now, if you do not need to store the value at all you might want to take a hack at parsing the input directly to another string that when printed will represent the decimal value....

  • Simple overloading problem

    Hi,
    I read in a book that overriding of final,private and
    static methods r not supported.i am able prove it for
    final methods but not for static and private .since
    java allows me to declare methods of the same signature in the subclasses for both static& private methods.
    Any light on this will be appreciated.
    thanx

    About static methods:
    class Parent {
      public static void method() {
    class Child extends Parent {
      public static void method() {
    public class Test {
      public static void main(String[] args) {
        Child c = new Child();
        Parent p = new Child();
        c.method(); // will call the static method in class Child
        // its the same as calling it as:
        Child.method();
        p.method(); // will call the static method in class Parent
        // its the same as calling it as:
        Parent.method();
        // if the method in Child and Parent wasn't static, then you would call the method in Child with p.method().
    }

  • System Overload & How to get the best G4 Performance

    Okay all you Logic and OSX Gurus. I need your help. I've finally made the LOGIC leap from OS9 and have hit the SYSTEM OVERLOAD wall like many of you before me.
    I've been pouring over this, and many other Forums and Blogs, for about two weeks now, and have tried many of the fixes / solutions to no avail. I estimate I'm now getting about 25% of my OS9 Logic performance from Logic in OSX.
    One specific case in point is this. A four minute song sketch. No tempo changes. Four midi tracks, 6 Audio instruments and 2 EFX (1 Guitar Amp Pro, 1 Space Designer that's no even being used).
    I have unsuccessfully tried to Bounce this to disc for two weeks now. The AUDIO and DISK I/O Meters barely register until the GUITAR AMP PRO track brings the AUDIO METER up to about 1/3rd usage. At various points in the Bounce the G4 will completely FREEZE, and I will have manually restart.
    THINGS I HAVE TRIED, and continue to try are:
    - Repairing Permissions
    - Trashing Preferences
    - Updating MOTU Drivers
    - Changing Processor performance setting - which I cannot do BTW, because my system does not seem to support this option.
    - Closing all Widgets
    - Freeing up more Space on my Mac OSx startup disk (I now have 78.41 Gig available on a 114.49 Gig drive)
    - Run Cocktail to clean up System logs and temporary files
    - FREEZING TRACKS as a temporary 'fix'. This did nothing BTW but add more strain to the CPU and I still had about 1/3rd the usage with my GUITAR AMP Plugin (and it still crashed).
    - Increased AUDIO BUFFER to 1024
    So, (and I guess this is really two sides of the same question)...
    1) How do I FIX this SYSTEM OVERLOAD problem, and
    2) How do I "optimize" my Dual 1.25 G4 in order to get the best performance possible out of LOGIC PRO?
    OTHER QUESTIONS I HAVE ARE:
    - Does the G4 have the processing power needed to run LOGIC PRO?
    - I'm confident adding RAM will "help" (can't hurt), but am I really dealing with a RAM Problem here or, again, can these processors really handle it?
    BTW - I'm not looking for an excuse to go shopping for a Quad G5 (I mean who needs an excuse... . But, I'm really trying to determine if at the end of the day I will spend money on RAM, Hard Drives, whatever..., and then still be frustrated and end up shopping.
    - Are SCSI drives a problem with Tiger / Logic? These Cheetah drives are fast (10,000 RPM), reliable, and have been great drives to record on. I'm trying to do this simple bounce to one of the Cheetahs and as I said it's just not happening.
    - Does the startup volume size effect performance?
    - Does the amount of free space on the start up drive effect performance?
    - Firewire 400 vs 800? My sample library is on the Firewire drive, and I'm thinking this does not pull a lot on the CPU as these get loaded into memory before playing? Am I right about that? It is Firewire 400.
    A long letter and a lot of questions. I thank you all in advance for any answers, guidance or direction you can give. Please also let me know if there is something I HAVEN'T asked, looked at or should be doing.
    Best,
    Kevin
    Kevin Saunders Hayes
    SYSTEM SPECS
    Machine Name: Power Mac G4
    Machine Model: PowerMac3,6
    CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (3.3)
    Number Of CPUs: 2
    CPU Speed: 1.25 GHz
    L2 Cache (per CPU): 256 KB
    L3 Cache (per CPU): 2 MB
    Memory: 1 GB
    Bus Speed: 167 MHz
    Boot ROM Version: 4.4.8f2
    Logic 7.1.1 (885)
    Pro Application Support 3.1
    MOTU 896 - Latest drivers
    2 - Seagate Cheetah 9 gig SCSI drives
    1 - Oxford Firewire (Up to 400 Mb/sec) with EXS Library
    G4 Duel 1.25   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    And after months of using Express, and a week of
    using Logic, I hadn't had a system overload until
    today. Now I'm having them all the time. It wasn't a
    set up change, it wasn't running on the battery, it
    wasn't running software monitoring, it's set up with
    512 i/o buffer, medium processor buffer. And it
    wasn't brought on by number of tracks - that's for
    sure. After it started happenind and I took a break &
    came back, I was sitting on my couch, Powerbook in
    my lap, tapping a beat in with the onscreen
    keyboard.... a SINGLE instrument, mind you. NO plugs,
    no other tracks of ANY kind. And it happened.
    There's a lot of great, relevant and very helpful info on this forum and it all helps and it all counts. But..... so many people are suffering this when moving up to Pro 7 from either Pro 6 or Express. One expects a change in system load when a major update comes along but more and more people are reporting that simply recording 1 or 2 tracks of audio, pure, no plug-ins or EQ is causing an overload whereas in the previous version(s) this was easily accomodated. This, you may have guessed, has happened to me as well. Are we to accept in 1 version increment (albeit a major one) there is such a massive increase in demand from hardware that you cannot record a pure no-plug-in stereo track? When going back to 6.4.3 it will happily record 8 at once, let you EQ and reverb and then do another 8 AND then another. With no troble at all.
    It is pointing more and more towards fundamental flaws in the programming. Did L7 come out too soon? Are we just beta testing what is pro software? We are only on 7.1.1 and 6 went to 6.4.3 but at no stage was it this bad at the fundamentals of what the App is for. I love Logic, I really do, but I think, even with all the great help we are fighting what Apple should be addressing. Not that you can find/contact/talk to or get any sort of response from them.
    I have tried but have gone back to 6.4.3 until 7.1.2 or even 7.2 appears, but I'm not paying for 7.2. My £200 upgrade from 6.4.3 is now sitting on a shelf desperately wanting to use it.

  • Memory cause for USB overload?

    Yesterday I installed 2gb of Kingston memory in my Macbook Pro replacing the original 512 card. I had given up on the processor like other people have posted: thinking that the USB port hard wired into the board was the problem. Since the computer had just undergone a complete archive and install and immediately reproduced the USB overload with nothing attached but a mouse. Indeed the computer had so many symptoms it's possible the original memory was slightly defective.
    But now miraculously the problem has disappeared, at least for the first trial of running a couple of DVD's on a 30in screen. I was able to use a wireless mouse the whole time which was never the case before.
    So if people have experienced this same USB overload problem with 1gb or more of memory would report on that I would greatly appreciate it and will give an anecdotal tip for those of you who may still be wanting a solution.
    Anecdote: I waited for a long time to install this memory thinking it was bought it in error: Kingston KTA-MB667K2/2G which all the specs say are for the Mac Mini. However it's still PC2 5300 200 pin 128M dimm cards. What ultimately happened is that Kingston abridged the line of ram they were selling because this offshoot was a redundancy of the more expensive KTA-MB667 line that is standard for the Macbook Pro single core duos. And I can assure you that the dimms fit Apple's specs as I didn't fully check it out until yesterday.
    PMacG5 2.Ghz iBookg4 1.42 Macbook Pro 2.0   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   2.5mem Singin'ShureLynx16x M-AOzonicProKeys88Motu896ARTubesGolden FCS-Lp 7.2.☮

    That's right smells like good old 'sold capitalist philosophy' making America work for us on this one and I'm going to get a new logic board out of apple anyway. Why shouldn't I?
    Even if that old board gets burned up for gold on the back alley streets of China. By all means if it doesn't concern you it never hurts to tell the truth but it's more fun to lie; don't ask don't tell doesn't that pretty much sum it up here in the greenhouse capital...eh?
    BTW: my truck runs like a MBP on Kingston high: 15% cleaner on veggie oil...
    PMacG5 2.Ghz iBookg4 1.42 Macbook Pro 2.0 Mac OS X (10.4.9) 2.5mem Singin'ShureLynx16x M-AOzonicProKeys88Motu896ARTubesGolden FCS-Lp 7.2.☮

  • Possible overloads solution...

    Again I can only speak based on the hardware I have, but I know the overloads problem is affecting A LOT of LP8 users.
    I went thru the tedious process of trying to get a more permanent solution to the constant Overloads problems I had even on very small projects (1 Audio track and 4 Virtual Instrument tracks). I had tried just about every suggestion and because I wanted to be sure I had a solution I had to exit LP8 and restart LP8 after each change I made.
    To make a long story short, the ONLY combination I had not tried under Preferences | Audio | Devices | Core Audio was setting the I/O buffer size to 256 and checking I/O safety (I had tried every other combination from 32 - 1024 with and without I/O safety checked). And viola suddenly my project was no longer getting any overloads and my CPU utilization was pretty good/low.
    Of course, I need to do a lot more testing and considerably more complex projects, but at least I'm moving in a more positive direction rather than a hopeless direction. I still feel such a simple project should NEVER reach any overloads regardless of my buffer settings and I've got plenty of System.logs with hard samples of real problems with LP8. So don't take this a LP8 is all good now, this is just a possible solution that is working for now and has at least made LP8 useful rather than useless to me.
    My Hardware:
    2 Dual Core processors (aka a Quad MacPro) @ 3GHz
    8GB RAM
    ATI 1900XT 512MB Video
    Motu Ultralite
    4 internal drives (1 500GB HD, 2 500GB RAID, 1 300GB Bootcamp Vista)
    Mackie Control
    Mackie C4 Pro
    MAudio Axiom 25
    So my suggestion is take the time to go thru EVERY single possible combination of I/O Buffer Size and I/O Safety enable/disable setting and be sure you exit LP8 after each setting change BEFORE you test.
    Hope this helps, Rob.
    Message was edited by: Rob A.

    Your sig shows you're still on Tiger. I only started having these problems when I moved to 10.5.1.
    Another solution for me was to select every track before the first play. BTW, the overloads would go away for the most part after every track had done a first play. Once every track had been "initialized", overloads were pretty rare (prior to the 256 buffer setting). But this was of course a very painful process to keep doing everytime I opened a project. The 256 buffer + safety I/O solutions seems to work so far. It's still very much a big coding problem for LP8, but at least I'm finding liveable work arounds til Apple fix it.
    Rob

  • Need solution for "HEAVY" overload.

    This is not the classic case of most of the system overload problems that I've been reading about, where a few settings might do the tricks, although if that's the case, then great! But I doubted...
    Here's my gear:
    -QUAD 6.5 GB 2 drives, 250GB + 500GB
    -RAID 2 X 500 GB
    -Logic
    -Redmatic
    -VSL
    The problem I'm having is a system overload regularly, and buffer is at largest. I work with very dense orchestration, Richard Strauss type and I never use less than 70 instruments, mostly performance, lots of scales and runs, articulations... I cannot afford to work with this problem of "system overload", and freezing tracks don't help, it actually works better in RAM. I need a SURE way to resolve this, what can I do?
    Thanks
    Guy
      Mac OS X (10.4.3)   Quad 2 drives 250GB and 500GB, Raid 2 X 500GB, Logic, VSL

    I am not saying don't use logic, just offload some of the work to another application or system. For your work, I don't think kontakt would be a good idea. I am not totally in the VSL loop but I have heard that they are moving into software as well, as in working on a host. Otherwise another sampler as standalone and/or another system used as a EXS player, because you probably want integration for your libraries. Kontakt would not be a good idea because it is more aimed at sound design from a sampler than max poly, and there are some really big issues for most users. I realize you have a great computer for this, but Logic just wasn't built this way-that's the cold fact. Perhaps they'll update this sometime but in the meantime you have work to do. Also, the VSL forum is a better place to ask, IMO. Not saying this is a bad place but everyone there is loading up a VSL lib and this is a huge library. You could try loading 2 instances of Logic...

  • System Overload for NO REASON.

    This seems to happen at random. Sometimes, when I use Logic, I get these errors constantly with neither the CPU or hard drive taxed AT ALL, regardless of what plug-ins I am using or how many. *This problem occurs whether I am using my Presonus Firepod or Built-In Audio as the audio driver.* Other times, I don't have the problem.
    A restart or two seems to fix it, but eventually the problem crops back up. If something else running on my machine is causing this problem, well...
    1. It shouldn't!
    2. What process of elimination am I going to use to find something I don't even know is there?
    I'm tired of reading thread after thread of overload problems easily explained away by not enough RAM, not using the latest version, using too many plug-ins, etc. I have tried various audio settings. There is no user error on my part for this problem, this is just a bug, widespread or not, and I want it fixed.

    The page ins/outs section shows no changes when playing from the timeline. I'm sorting processes by current CPU usage, and there's no noticeable spikes from any other process. In this case, Logic is only using 21%.
    Thanks for the help!

  • Problem In ToolBar

    Hi All,
    I have a Problem with The Tabs Showing all The Roles Like
    UserAdmin,System Admin,and its Corresponding all worksets. Tabs are appearing middle of the Screen..If i Click a Role r Workset its Again Comming Down.Plz Help Me out..
    [Note : Good Reply Will b Rewarded]

    Hi Ramganesan,
      I have seen this problem in my server and also SDN sometimes(Portal screen opening inside portal screen similarly). I think it can be due to overloading problem. Restart the server and everything will work fine.
    Regards,
    Harini S
    [ Reward points for helpful answers ]

Maybe you are looking for