Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll

Hello all. I have this scenario with a company that was merged into another and retroactive payroll occurs for absences and extra time in the "old" company, but the "old" merged company is closed so no postings can occur.
I also found this unanswered post: How to Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll
We suppose that retroactive differences could be accounted in the new company code but I didnu2019t found any way to do it even in the BADI SMOD_PCPO0001 I couldnu2019t find a way to change the company code/cost center....
Does anyone have dealt with the same problem? What is the solution?

Amosha, thank you for your response. Here is PCP0 that shows what I mean by 'header company code' that I don't see how to change (I re-ran pd 26 2008--bi-weekly payroll, btw):
06/30/2009 Posting Document
Run                      0000002791
Company Code    0057
Document            0000008174
PostingCurrency USD
Reference           HRPAY00009
Doc. Type            ZB
Run Type             PP
Posting Date        12/01/2008
Documant Type   G/L Account Document
Document Date    06/30/2009
Bus. Transaction HRP1
    There are error messages for this document
Account Number with Text
21301000   Accrued Salaries & Wages   CCTR 14515      ...
20303998   HR P/R Doc Split                                               ...
Messages for Document 000008174
Error in document: HRPAY 0000008174
The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 0001, not 0057
Company code 0057 is now closed and has been merged into 0001. Cost center 14515 in the above doc was populated by my clone of RPCIPE00 and call to my BAdI which retrieved current company and cost center from PA0001. You can see from above that the 'header' data still shows 0057 and indeed, my version of RPCIPE00 only changes P_ITEM-BUKRS, P_ITEM-KOSTL and P_ITEM-SGTXT. It looks to me that fm HRPP_TRANSLATE_FICO gets the 'header' company code afresh. I was planning to leave WPBP-BUKRS (and all other Payroll data) alone (ie, not override company code).
As for your other question, we post retros to /551 and /552.
Thanks again.

Similar Messages

How to Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll

Current problem: A company code has been 'merged' into another one and the old company code can no longer be used. In the last payroll run, there was a rate change that caused a retro back to the time of the old company code and since the old company code and cost center were closed, the FI posting error'ed out. To correct, we had to delete the offending pernr from the cluster and back out the rate change until we came up with a solution.
Investigation has revealed a process called 'Substitute Cost Centers', but we tested it and a 'flusher' cost center is required to be set up in the old company code and FI refuses to open it up.
Also, I've located 3 user exits for RPCIPE00, but I do not see where company and cost center can be changed. So I've tried to code my own BAdi, but there seems to be a header company code that I'm not getting. The item company code and cost center seem to be doable, but I don't know how to change the header company code.
I am new to HR and Payroll having spent the last couple of years in BI and before that I worked with the material master and Purchasing. It is my humble opinion that the company should not have been 'turned off' until Payroll was finished with it and that means 2 years until we archive. In reading about symbolic accounts, several times it is written not ever to delete them. Seems to me company code is the same. But surely I must be wrong and there is a solution that will make everybody happy.
I would appreciate any and all ideas. Thank you so much.

Amosha, thank you for your response. Here is PCP0 that shows what I mean by 'header company code' that I don't see how to change (I re-ran pd 26 2008--bi-weekly payroll, btw):
06/30/2009 Posting Document
Run                      0000002791
Company Code    0057
Document            0000008174
PostingCurrency USD
Reference           HRPAY00009
Doc. Type            ZB
Run Type             PP
Posting Date        12/01/2008
Documant Type   G/L Account Document
Document Date    06/30/2009
Bus. Transaction HRP1
    There are error messages for this document
Account Number with Text
21301000   Accrued Salaries & Wages   CCTR 14515      ...
20303998   HR P/R Doc Split                                               ...
Messages for Document 000008174
Error in document: HRPAY 0000008174
The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 0001, not 0057
Company code 0057 is now closed and has been merged into 0001. Cost center 14515 in the above doc was populated by my clone of RPCIPE00 and call to my BAdI which retrieved current company and cost center from PA0001. You can see from above that the 'header' data still shows 0057 and indeed, my version of RPCIPE00 only changes P_ITEM-BUKRS, P_ITEM-KOSTL and P_ITEM-SGTXT. It looks to me that fm HRPP_TRANSLATE_FICO gets the 'header' company code afresh. I was planning to leave WPBP-BUKRS (and all other Payroll data) alone (ie, not override company code).
As for your other question, we post retros to /551 and /552.
Thanks again.

Control G/L account and Cost Center for movement type 251

Dear Friends,
I would like to use mov. type 251 for GI for sale and like to control over G/L account and Cost center.
The G/L account is by default from the valuation class of the the material and if the user will enter wrong G/L
we had done the customising in OMJJ movement type 251 - Account grouping - Unchecked the check box of column
"Check account assignment" - Impact is " the system always uses the G/L accounts or account assignments determined automatically"
I also made default cost center for G/L account and plant wise through OKB9.
Now I would like to suppress/dispaly the G/L account and cost center - for same I had done Setting in Entry control menu of OMJJ for 251 of field Account control - Value - "-" field is suppressed. But it is not working.
Please advise to solve this situation.
Thanks & Regards
Rajan

Dear Rajan
Yes, I have checked in MB1A earlier. We have separate node for Field seletion layout for Enjoy transaction MIGO for mvt type in which the G/L account (KONTO) an Cost center (KOSTL) have only optional or required entry selection.
warm regards
Ramakrishna.

Automatically populating cost center for 551 posting

Hi MM Experts,
Is there any way the cost center for the 551 movement type can be automatically populated into the field without the user entering it? We are posting a 551 posting from a legacy system and jsut want to find out if I can do any OBYC settings to make the cost center come up automatically?

I believe the above answer is best approach, assuming you are always scrapping to the same Cost Centre. You can default a Cost Centre indirectly, by linking it to the defauled GL (if it's valuated stock then technically I believe it is a General Ledger code, rather than a Cost Element).
If you're going to do this for 551 you preumably want to do it for the other scrapping movement types 552, 553 etc. too.

How to control the Cost Center incurred value posted from many transactions

In KP60, cost center wise , element wise budget is allocated .i.e planned. Ex: 450000 is assigned and saved.
Now ex: in FB60, when we post a vendor invoice having the value greater than the above value, system should not allow.
Like this, the cost to the cost center can be incurred to the cost center not only in FB60 , but also from many transactions.

Is it possible that you mean KP06? (not KP60???)
Because if this is the case KP06 is only for planning...not budget.
Please clarify..
Pan

Plant and Cost Center are not displaying in FI doc. for asset scrap ABAVN.

Hi All,
When we do asset retirement by Scraping using Transaction Code ABAVN, Plant and Cost center are not appearing in the FI document. But, in the master data the Plant and Cost center are assigned for the particular Asset.
When I see the FI document display, the fields Cost Center and Plant are blank. Business Area and Profit Center fields are getting updated.
Can any one help me how to get this Plant and Cost Center in the posted document. Is there any OSS notes for this. I am using ECC 6.0 version.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Rajesh

Rajesh
Aditional on me answer.
The systemtakes not the cost center from the asset you have to assign it in OKB9 or to fill in during this posting:
Steps
Click on Simulate, than you see the posting screen:
Click on the line (pk 40)
Click on Goto and Additional account assignment and fill in the cost center whatu2019s in the master record of the asset and post
An other option is to make a substitution to get this information

HR - SRM Replication: Issue with company code and cost center

Hello Experts,
We have a scenario where we are trying to replicate the HR Org Structure into the SRM system.
All the standard settings have been made using relevant SAP Notes and other help available on SRM.
However, the company code and cost center for a particular position are not getting updated into SRM.
These details are present in the Inbound Idoc from the ECC system.
Is there any setting we may have missed out on?
Please help.

Hi
Kindly check your ALE Filter in BD64 in the sending system. You need to maintain the objects C K O S and infotype 1001 and related subtypes in the filter model.
Also check the Evaluation path that you are using to send data.
Regards
Vijay V

G/L Accounts and cost center

i would like to find the list of valid G/l Accounts and cost center for a input company code. Is there any good tables for getting this information. ?

I don't think there is such a thing. If a GL is valid for a company code and a cost center is valid for the corresponding controlling area, then the transaction should post. A relationship between controlling area and company code is in table A059 (Controlling Area/Company Code). This table is empty in our system, so I don't think that checks will be made.
Rob

Cost center for SD

Hi All,
Please advice what r all the cost centers to be created for Sales & distribution category & admin category?
regards,
Arunkumar

Hi,
It depends as per company requirement, Cost center for SD may be marketing, selling and distribution,Administration ETC.
Regards,
Sreekanth

GL account and cost center field appearing for Goods issue movt type 201

Hi SAP Gurus
We are trying to post goods issue in ecc6 . The problem is that the GL Account and cost center fields are available fields .The cost center field is logical but why the GL account field is avaiable .
How we can grey out the same field as it is going to be picked up from the valuation class setting in GBB - VBR ? Any ideas
Regards
Hitesh

Hi Ravi
You think that its ok we have to input the cost center .
But if you allow the users to input the GL then you are overriding the whole purpose of defining the valuation class and offsetting entries ? What is your opinion ?When you input the material in the goods issue screen the offsetting entry needs to be picked from the GBB -VBR .Although even if you do not enter the GL the system posts the Godds issue document .But from the control perspective this needs to be suppressed .
What do you think ?
I have also posted the same in Logistics forum .
Once again many thanks for your help .In case you find some solution this would be of great help
Regards

Select cost center for physical inventory difference posting

Hello,
While posting physical inventory differences (transactions MI07 or MI10) the choice of cost center is not offered. A default cost center is used by the system.
Is there a way to choose the cost center for inventory difference postings? This is useful considering we have several inventories managed by several business units with different cost centers.
Kind regards,
Sergei Volkov

this is from OSS note 13423:
Symptom
Key word: Inv acct assign
No account assignment can be entered when posting inventory
discrepancies.
Additional key words
MI07
Cause and prerequisites
This function is not implemented.
Solution
In Customizing an account assignment can be made for every inventory
adjustment account. To do this the inventory adjustment account must
first be defined as a cost element (Transaction KA01 / KA06):
Accounting -> Controlling -> Cost centers -> Master data -> Cost element
-> Create primary / secondary. Then an account assignment can be made
for the cost element (Transaction OKB9):
Tools -> Customizing -> Setup menu -> Accounting -> Controlling -> Cost
centers -> Actual postings -> Automatic account assignment.
If this account assignment is implemented every posting to the
particular inventory adjustment account will automatically receive the
appropriate account assignment.

Sourcing: Shows wrong company code and cost center

Hello
We have implemented SRM4.0 SP8. When we display shopping carts in sourcing cockpit before aggregate to create a PO, we check that SC from different companies doesnt show the correct company code and cost center. We have a central purchase group that aggregates SC from different enterprises. For two SC, the second displays a wrong company code and cost center.
Example:
First SC:
SC -> A123
Company -> SNLL
Cost center > AAA
Second SC:
SC -> A124
Company -> SNPP
Const center -> BBB
When displaying the second SC it shows company code SNLL and Cost center AAA each is incorrect. In DB data is correct for each SC, company code (table BBP_PDBEI) and cost center per item (BBP_PDACC). Even if we aggregate both SC to create one PO, this document has correct data per item (different company code, requester, cost center) the only issue is related with the information showed in ITS/HTML in sourcing cockpit before aggregation.
Do you have any idea how can we resolve this?
Thanks in advance

Hi
Seems like a SRM bug.. with the Support pack 8... Try upgrade to latest support pack in SRM system, if possible...
Also Please create a customer OSS message with SAP !!
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

ALE for G/L and Cost Center Master Data

Dear Expert,
I am a fresher in ALE and want to distribute G/L and Cost Center Master Data from our production system to Development and Q/A system. Can you give some guidances? and how to configure ALE for this purpose?
Regards,
MAL

hi,
steps to configure ALE :
1.first u hav to create 2 logical systems for ur 2 clients in BD54.
2.then assign thm in SCC4 for both clients.
3.thn crete rfc destination in SM59.create in client from which u want to send only.
4.create port in WE21 for sender.
5.create partner profiles in We20 for both clients,outbound for sender and inbound for reciever.
6.now create distribution model in BD64.
generate partner profiles and distribute.
now ur ale configration to send data frm 1 clnt to other is ready.
u hav diff methods like master data,change pointers,idoc extensions,idoc reductions,...... to send data .
hope this helps.
reward points if helpful.

Cost center and profit center for a G/L account

Hi
Can nyone plss tell me whether a G/L account can have both Cost center and <b>Profit center or it can have just any one of them.

Hello,
Yes, a GL account can have both CC and PC. The tables for them are.
in BSEG you will find KOSTL(Cost Center) and PRCTR(Profit Center). The Master Data and Text table for profit center and cost center are,
Profit Center Master Data: CEPC
Profit Center Text Table: CEPCT
Cost Center Master Data: CSKS
Cost Center Text Table: CSKT
Regards,
Shehryrar Dahar

Transfer Out and In for entire department and cost center

I am attempting to create a br or calc script to move all employees from a dept and cost center combination to another dept and cost center combination. I was wondering if anyone else has solved this or if it is in fact possible to do this. When you have 1 or 2 hundred employees that need to be moved it hurts to think of having to move them all one at a time using the traditional transfer out br and then the transfer in br.

I have not done this but I am sure this can be done. In default transfer rule, employee member is a prompt. In your case, you need to copy the rule and fix on level zero level employee dimension instead of employee prompt. That should pretty much take care of everything.
However, you might run into few issues when employees are transferred out but not transferred is as yet and multiple users run this rule. Then you will lose reference to employees transferred out from a particular department. Since your example might be more valid in cases where departments are closed in GL systems, it might be a good option to make the rule to transfer out and transfer in at same time in a single business rule.
HTH

Override Company and Cost Center for FI Posting from HR Payroll

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for