Overwrite the system calculated VAT - Condition Value with Inbound VAT Amou

Hello experts:
We have a following requirement in my customer for Inbound VAT Processing.
We want to overwrite the system calculated VAT - Condition Value with Inbound VAT Amount
Details :
Aggregated sales Idoc ( WPUUMS01) is used here for posting the daily sale.
Inbound pricing procedure is ZPOS00 ( copy of POS000)
VAT is maintained with condition Type ZMWS. Using Tax Codes
When idoc get posted system calculates the ZMWS and working fine.
However we would like to overwrite this condition value with inbound condition value (from segment 5 of WPUUMS)
Example :
For Article A : inbound aggregated sales Amount= 100 INR and ZMWS is 10%( VAT code B1)
Then system will calculate 90 INR revenue and 10 INR as VAT
However due to rounding in POS system we may get from POS the VAT Amount =9.99 for example.
Tisak wants to overwrite the condition value 10 INR with 9.99 INR.
I will appreciate if anybody can suggest some approach or share experience if came across the same scenario (Tax condition type).
Thanks and regards,

Hi,
Either you can use rounding in POS such that it round up for 9.99 to 10.
And then in SAP pricing procedure you can use alternate calculation type as 16 or 17 (17 should be used with decimal point assigned to currency for rounding like 2 decimal for INR).
doing this will also round the figure from 9.99 to 10 is SAP.
Hope this solves your query.
Regards,
Ashutosh

Similar Messages

In Sales enquiary stage how system calculate EK02 condition value as cacula

Hi
In Sales enquiary stage how system calculate EK02 condition value as caculated cost
Is there any cofig to get the value of EK02 condition for calculated cost at Enquairy stage only for forcasting
Regards
Santosh

Hi,
In our company we get the calculated cost into our sales document with the following configuration:
IMG: Plant maintenance and customer service / Maintenance and service processing / Basic settings / Quotation creation and billing / ODP4 - Assign conditions to sales document types
With this configuration, we assign the calculated cost condition (EK02) to the corresponding sales document. The system sends the calculated costs from the order to the corresponding sales order created.
Regards,
Óscar
http://blogdesap.blogspot.com

Why the system is picking negative value in commitment budget?

While creating a GRN I am getting an error message u201CItem 001 WBS element MA.01.01 budget exceededu201D checking the same in budget report, I found that that the PO value of the element is negative in commitment budget amount details.
Why the system is picking negative value in commitment budget?
How can I fix the system from not allowing negative value?
Example: Total budget in WBS Element MA.01.01 is Rs.10,000.00.
The PO value for PO001 Rs.4,000.00, PO002 Rs.3,000.00 & Rs.2,000.00.
It means the available budget is Rs.1,000.00.
But when creating another PO value of Rs.2,000.00 the PO is getting save.
After that the system is considering any of the PO as negative. When I am trying to create GRN on that particular PO system is giving error message and asking to increase budget.

Hi ,
Check whether
1. In transaction OKKP for the controlling area commitement mgmt is active.
2. If this is only for a specific project the try to reconstruct project info database in transaction CJEN.
3. During the accounting entries system may hitting the recovery G/L accounts with the help of MM consultant check the accounting settings in transaction OBYC are correct or not.
Rgds

Change the Purchase Order : Item - Conditions value

Hi,
How to change the Purchase Order : Item - Conditions value.
In my PO, Item conditions shows the SKTO - Cash Discount value is 0. I want to change the Discount value 10.
How can i change it??

Hi,
Goto the Transaction code MN05 and give the CONDITION TYPE SKTO and change the value
MN05 is the Transaction code for Purchase order condition types.
Please check and revert back if you need more details.
regards,
santosh

I can't overwrite the adressbook on my iphone 4 with the adressbook on my imac

I can't overwrite the adressbook on my iphone 4 with the adressbook on my imac

Welcome to the Apple community.
Unfortunately, you cannot do very much with your phone unless you get assistance from the previous owner, they should either provide you with the password to unlock it or remove their account from the phone entirely remotely through iCloud.com > Find My Phone.

Msg KH206 In element "" the system adds quantities and values or diff.curr.

Dears,
In report painter KE35, i've add an formula
Planned sales profit = Planned sales rev - expense
but sales rev. is made of the other formula
Planned sales rev = Planned sales price * sales QTY
So, an error "Msg KH206 In element "sales profit" the system adds quantities and values or diff.curr."
Then i use KER1 to achieve above formula for COPA layout use, but same error occured.
Msg KH212_ For key figure "Planned sales profit", quantities and values or different currencies were added.
Any method can solve this question?
Thanks in advance.
BR,
Emma

Hi,
For the transaction KE35 you can use the no dimension function (NDI), like this:
NDI (Planned sales price) * NDI (sales QTY)
I have this problem in the KER1 too, but on this transaction we do not have this NDI option.
Best Regards,
Daniel Scoz.

How the system calculated the last evaluated price

how the system calculated the last evaluated price in inventory

Hi!
Last Evaluated Price u2013 the price calculated in the last run of the Inventory Valuation report

How come the sight was down so long? and why does the system not send emails anymore with responses?

how come the sight was down so long? and why does the system not send emails anymore with responses?

The system is back up and fully functional. How long has it been since you stopped receiving notifications? Can you share your form with us so we can have a look into what might be going wrong?
Andrew

Transfer condition values with +/- signs to CO-PA (Explain the purpose)

Dear Sap guru's,
Could you please guide me on the below issue, We make a new condition type zne1 which is excise duty free items, Based on cleint requirement. a/c entry like this ( example )
10) 210 ea            net value 23,153.04 cost 21,600.00
20) 0 ea              net value 0               cost 2400
           Customer AC           DR 20163 Rs
           Excise duty payble   Cr 432 -
           Sales                      Cr 22721-
           vat payable              cr 3010-
           excise duty payble   cr 48-
           Excise duty free       cr 48-
           Excise duty free       dr 48
           sales                       dr 48
Here client pay the excise duty for free goods issue items, For this situation what ever the amount he paid in the excise duty free item that same amount he wants to reduce in sales ie it should be debit in my exaple it is 48 rs.
My problem is i configured ZNE1 condtion assgined to value filed ERLOS. While release to a/c system returns "CHEK VALUE FILED ASSIGNEMENT TO CONDITION TYPE". when I make the settings +/- sign for the conditon system allow me to release and save. Please guide me whithout assignment how to release billing document?
Regards
Maruthi

Hi
Conditions from SD are always transferred to CO-PA with "+" signs, with the exception of credit memos and returns. The reasons for this is that the signs for revenues are handled differently in the different applications of the R/3 System. For example, revenues are positive in SD, while they are negative in FI. Consequently, CO-PA accepts all the values as positive, and then subtracts deductions and costs from revenues in the information system.
This configuration needs to be done in the system if you have the CO-PA active and the SD flows are configured. Unfortunately you will not be able to ignore this. Please see below some SAP help snippets for your benefit.
Note that certain limitations exist on the transfer of condition values of billing documents to CO-PA.
1. To transfer condition types for sales revenues and sales deductions to CO-PA, you need to make sure that the condition types and linked to an account in FI that is also defined as a cost element of the category "11" (revenue element) or "12" (sales deduction) in CO. These condition types must be assigned to a CO-PA value field.
Condition types linked to FI accounts that are defined as cost elements of another category are not transferred to CO-PA, even when the condition type has been assigned to a CO-PA value field.
2. Condition types such as "VPRS" ("Cost") that are defined as statistical in SD are always transferred to CO-PA if they are assigned to a value field.
3. All condition types that you want to transfer to CO-PA must be active in the SD pricing procedure. Inactive conditions in a billing item are not transferred. If all the conditions in a billing item are inactive, that item is not transferred to CO-PA.
Conditions do not need to be active, however, to be transferred with sales order items, since the transfer of incoming sales orders is always statistical.
It is also possible to transfer conditions from MM to update billing data in pooled payment in the IS Retail system. These are transferred according to the same rules as SD conditions
Hope it was helpful.
Karthik

What is the Procedure to Create "Condition Value" Routine Using VOFM

Dear Guru,
I want to know Step-By-Step Procedure to Create "Condition Value" Routine Using VOFM.
Give me guideline how it will link to program RV64ANNN.
and if it doesnot link to RV64ANNN
what might be the possible reason and how to make it link with RV64ANNN.

Dear Guru.
I have encountered a technical issue related to Creation of User Routine for pricing procedure
(Routine :: RV64A978).
Before coming to issue I want to give you slight glance on my requirement.
I have got two requirements to write two routines for a new condition type -->> packing type .
>>Routine Number One First I Have wrote Requirement Routine         RV61A943
Routine Number two  Other I Have wrote calculate condition value  RV64A978
So as usual normal procedure of writing a routine I followed VOFM for writing routine for pricing procedure and routine for calculation (condition value).
I performed above respective process for both routines in VOFM.
And I have activated both routine from going VOFMMenu bar edit  Activate.
After activation automatic include is generated in both case .
INCLUDE RV61A943 . "FAMD PAckage Wt
Is generated in RV61ANNN
INCLUDE RV64A978 . "FAMD Package-Rate
Is generated in RV64ANNN
In case of Routine  RV61A943
I can able to find the main include routine RV61ANNN from where used function in SE38 and able to trace it.
And I am able to find it in the lists of Includes of RV61ANNN.
But In case of Routine  RV64A978
I can not able to find the main include routine RV64ANNN from where used function and able to trace it. Pls refer below picture.
But in RV64ANNN it is showing that routine RV64A978 is there 
So Guru I want to know following things >
1.     What might be the main reason in case of RV64A978 ??
2.     How I should approach to solve this issue??
Because what I understood unless routine RV64A978 is traceable from u201Cwhere usedu201D to find out its main routine RV64ANNN , the routine RV64A978 wont work in pricing procedure (I believe).

Calculation XML signature value with timestamp

I know how to calculate a signature value based on the elment "SignedInfo" in a xml document.
The problem is when a timstamp is used, hash value is also added to the signedinfo, but the calculation of the signature value is not the signature of that element, there is an extra calculation with that timestamp. Does anyone know the algorythm with timestamp?

If you are trying to add a timestamp to your document, put it into a SignatureProperty and include the property for the signautre calculation; see here for an example: XML dsig: Can I sign a SignatureProperty of the Signature?
If you are trying to do something else, you need to elaborate.
Arshad Noor
StrongAuth, Inc.

Not clear with the statement ( A large double value with redundant D )

Hi,
I am not clear about the statment below. What does redundant D means.
*123.4E+306D// A large double value with redundant D*

By default any floating-point literal in Java is a double, so the trailing D that specifies that explicitly is redundant.

How to overwrite the system event "Close"?

Hi,
How to overwrite the event for "Close" button in a screen?
"Close" is the system event. I need to write my own code for "Save" in the event and then close the screen.
Pls help me in doing this. Provide me the sample code.
Regards,
SAP Lover

Hi,
Check out this related thread ... Hope it helps
Re: how to close screen?
Regards,
Santosh

System calculating open order value

Hi,
We have maintained delivery tolerance (10%) and update group in credit management is 12. If i create a sales order of 10 kg and delivered 9.3 kg than bill the same quantity to the customer and sales ordered will be complete because of delivery tolerance. but system not considering sales order as closed order in credit data . system showing total quantity(10) as a A\R . But it should be 9.3kg.

Hi
Where did you check that its showing 10kg in A/R?
Did you check the FBL5N transaction? Or, did you check the credit exposure value which is the same as the value in Sales order for 10KG?
Regards
Madhu

What is the system requirements for MAM3.0 with MI7.1

Hi Experts,
We are planning to Install MI7.1 and want to deploy MAM3.0 application. Till now we are using MI2.5, now we want to upgrade this to MI7.1. Can any body please tell me what is the requirements of
Server
Client
MAM Version
Client Database
Also please tell me whether MAM3.0 supports MI7.1 for PDA.
Your help in this regard is highly appreciable.
Regards,
Murthy.

Hi Murthy,
first of all MI7.1 is not generally available at the moment. Secondly MAM3.0 is not working with MI7.1. There will be a MAM verison especially for MI7.1 available, but the release date is not official jet. Rumors tell something about next year - but as I said, no official date is mentioned.
So I guess it is a wise decision to wait a little longer.
And be aware with MI7.1 to UI of MAM has changed completely. It is not longer based in JSP - so all your enhancements need a complete rewrite!
Beside that the requirements are totally open - cause nothing is officially released yet.
Regards,
Oliver

Overwrite the system calculated VAT - Condition Value with Inbound VAT Amou

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for