P&F before excise calculation
Dear All,
I want to calculate Packing and Frw'ing charges before excise and fright value before VAT.
E.g. Basic price is 100
P&F Charges +10
110
Bed 8%
ECS 2%
HeCess 1%
(Approx) 121
Frg 50
171
VAT (4% or 12.5%) 70
Total 241
As we have to enter P&F charges and Frieght in pricing and taxes will be calclulated in Tax procedure how we will copy the values from pricing to tax procude.
1) Shall I define conditions for both, pricing and tax procedure.
2) Which acccess sequence should I use.
3) Which routine should I use?
Thanks and Regards.
Prakash
There is nothing special to be done Just check the condition type as below should mentioned in transaction code M/06
Condit. type P&F1 Pack & Forward (%) Access seq.
Cond. class A Discount or surcharge Plus/minus A Positive
Calculat.type A Percentage
Cond.category
Rounding rule Commercial
StrucCond.
GrpCond.routine
Manual entries No limitations
valid from Today's date PricingProc
Valid to 31.12.9999 delete fr. DB
Scale basis B Value scale Scale formula
further in Pricing procedure you need to assign the condition type in pricing schema.
Similar Messages
-
VAT/Excise calculation - map pricing & tax procedures
Dear,
Pls tell me how to map my blw senerio;
In pricing procedure, i have
A- Gross price
B- Handlying charges
C- Excise on A+B,
here i need to calculate my exise on A+B values and it flows (C) frm tax procedure (taxinn). until here i'm ok.
D - A BC
E - Insurance (defined in pricing proce) on D value,
here i'm unbale to map my price, since the sytem taking A+ B price only, its not taking my D values... I need to map pricing & tax procedures, since Gross price, Han. charges and insurance flows frm pricing proce and Excise frm tax procedure.
Anyone has right solution, pls guide me...Hello sapjj
Here in your issue, u have to maintain a dummy condition type for excise calculation in your pricing procedure. The excise on A+B will be calculated in pricing procedure itself and not it flows from tax procedure.You have to make a condition type in pricing procedure and mark it as statistical in the procedure so that it doesn't get added to material value.
you are ok till gross price and handling charges, right?
Then you include your dummy condition type for excise amount calculation.Then in the next step calculate a subtotal without giving any condition type and maintaining 'S' in the subtotal field in the pricing procedure.
In the next step include the insurance condition type and calculate it on the subtotal.
This will help
Regards
Gregory Mathews -
Excise Calculated on Freight MIRO
Dear Gurus,
I am having the issue when Excise duty is being calculated on Freight suggested in PO while doing MIRO, Altough it is not calculated in PO.
I am using the TAXINN Procedure.
Please suggest how to avoid excise calculation on delivery amt in PO at the time of MIRO.
Because most of the time service tax is involved on delivery amt.
PO
PO Value- 1000
BED- 140
ECS- 3
SECS- 1
SUBTOTAL- 1144
VAT- 46
SUBTOTAL- 1190
FREIGHT- 119
TOTAL- 1309
MIGO
STOCK- 1119+
GR/IR 1000-
Freight Clearing 119-
Excise Posted as per PO
MIRO POSTING-
1. Goods-
VENDOR- 1190-
GR/IR- 1000+
CENVAT CLEARING- 144+
VAT- 46+
2. MIRO Freight-
VENDOR- 141-
Freight Clearing 119+
CENVAT CLEARING- 17+
VAT 5+
When i am posting MIRO For Goods items + Planned Delivery Cost still the excise is being calculated on excise amt & the entries are same above........
Please suggest
Thanks
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Dec 16, 2008 4:14 PM
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Dec 16, 2008 4:15 PM
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Dec 17, 2008 7:12 AMhi,
use zero tax code at MIRO for freight clearing.
regards,
sujit -
TAXINN - Excise Calculation - FM
Dear Friends,
in my company we are using TAXINJ , but now we shifted to TAXINN ..
for Excise Calculation i used the FM - "J_1I6_DETERMINE_EXCISE_RATE"
but i think its calcu.. only for TAXINJ . in new TAXINN its not giving me output..
In TAXINJ its depends on the Chapter id that people has to maintain every time ..
but in TAXINN they r not maintaining Chapter id ...
without chapter id this FM is nt working ... so anyone can help me in this scenario......
Actually i m preparing Purchase Register from FI Side........Hi Manish,
The main reason behind the error:
The value of the document input parameter 'AssessableValue' is missing
which you are geting in the freight charges is CENVAT code is not allowed at document level freight charges, nothing wrong with the formula.
thats why in my earlier comments i suggested you to enter packing charges at row level.
Anyways your issue is solved tht is important.
swap -
Hi Friends
In One My client i have following problem regarding
excise calculation
Basically in import purchase.Excise calculation(Duty, Cess,ED cess) is done asper goverment rule.This Calculation is depends on Assesalbe value .
Actaul cost price for product is diffrent.
on cost price again vat calculation is done .
When sale of this item is done only excsie calculation is passe d to customer .and selling price is again deffrent.on selling price vat calcultion is done.
how do i handel this sceanerio in Business on how i link particular purchse to particular sale.
Pls help as early as possibleSachin,
The ED and others should be calculated on Assessable Value. But the Vat should be calculated on unit price.
I hope this is the scenario.
In A/R or AP document, there is a field called assessable value. you should activate this in thru form settings.
The Tax formula for ED should be like this: The Base Amount should be set as Assessable Value.
For Vat base amount you should give the formula as Qty*Price + ED Amount.
You can get these formulaes in SBO Demo Company itself. Hope u understood this.
If the Unit Price includes ED credit, You have to create a UDF for capturing the Base amount and link it to the tax formulae. The Unit Price filed should be assigned formatted search for Unit Price Less ED Amount.
Still if u r not understanding please mail me to [email protected] -
Using concessional excise calculation under taxinn
dear all
we are evalution taxinn in ecc6. based on the sap document we have configured the normal taxinn and the same is shown in the sales order.
but in the present setup, the client needs to modify the excise duty at the order level rather than changing the value at VK11 --> JEXP.
did anyone work on the concessional excise calculation under taxinn ? and if yes how did they comply with the concessional excise calculation requirement
full point will be given
regardsdear saurabh,
thanks for the reply
the first logic will not work as the client is SOX compliant compnay and the values for pricing procedures should always come from vk11
the 2nd alt will also not work with the client becasue of the first reason.
plz continue the good work -
Problem in Depot Excise Calculation
Dear Friends,
We have a 2 decimals defined for amounts. which cannot be changed
thus, for instance if the excise amount per unit comes upto 0.0045226667, the system rounds up the price to 0.05, while billing
due to which billing document and the depot invoice base value are varying.
for ex : 5000 qty * 0.0045226667 = 678.40 (value in J_1iRG23D table)
and 5000 qty*0.05 = 750.00 (calculated as per billing Document)
The assessable base value is of Inward does not match with Outward (Billing) and leads to over/under pricing
Please advice on how can this be priced appropria
Regards,
Charmaine MartinIn standard depot process, before creating commercial invoice, you create an excise invoice referencing the parent excise invoice and this being the case, I dont understand how come the value would differ in your case.
Were you not referencing the parent excise invoice in J1IJ ??
G. Lakshmipathi -
hi all
my pricing is nt calculating the Basic Excise Duty in my procedure...
JMOQ- I have maintained 75rs per ton for ths condition type
what can be the causes for ths ?
SAP MMthen check in FV12 the validity date of condition and compare that date with purchase order date.
that date should be befor or on PO date.
Check and confirm
Regards
Kedar Kulkarni -
Base value for Excise calculation
Hi SD Gurus,
Is <b>Excise duty</b> calculated on the basis of gross value of the material.?? what happens in case there is some discount given to the customer? Pleae confirm.
Does <b>assement value</b> is considered for evaluating the excise duty..??
Gupta.PHi Gupta,
The base value needs to be declared by the company to the excise department. Based on this value the excise duty is calculated. Irrespective the discount given the excise duty is to be computed on the base value
prasanna -
MRP and NDP based excise calculation
Dear All,
In our orgainsation we have two catagories of product.
in first catagory excise duty is calculated on MRP(-)38% Abatment and 2nd catagory product Excise duty is calculated on Net Dealer billing price.
Can any one help me how to configured both the scinerio in a single pricing procedure.
Regards,
KC ChoudhuryHai,
Hope ur query is related to Maximum retail price inclusive of excise.
You have to follow this
Check the OSS note no: 1104456 for this kind of purchase.
1.Create the PO with invoicing amt. Take tax code as a Zero tax code.
2.release the PO if release strategy applicable.
3.Do the GR for the PO.As u know the exact excise amt at the time of GR, u have to enter this excise values manually.
4.In the MIGO - Header - excise invoice tab - More documents - Miscellaneous tab - Flag the MRP indicator.This must be ticked, so that the excise base value & excise duty values can be changed. This you can change at the item level Excise tab in GR.
5.Now Post the GR & post the excise invoice.
5.While doing MIRO for this PO, reduce the invoicing amt with tax values in the item level, as this invoicing amt includes taxes also. Select the proper tax code at the item & header level. Simulate & post the vendor invoice. -
Wrong excise calculations in MIRO
Dear All,
we have created a PO and partial MIGO and MIRO has been done and all the entries has been posted correctly. Now while doing MIRO for the remaining partial quantity excise values are calculating wrong in MIRO. GRN has been done and part 1 and part 2 entries also posted. the tax code has 12% , 2% , 1 % and VAT 5.5% . In part 1 and 2 12% amount 2734.00 has been posted. while doing MIRO ED value is calcuating as 1367.00.
i have checked in FTXP and in J1ID the values has not been changed. Kindly suggest how to proceed.
thanks and regards,
RGSthank you so much..!! i check the table J_1IGRXREF as the per link suggested and found only half of the amount is updated there. i.e., 1367.00
Again i checked the table with the excise invoice number and found two entries of 1367.00 with two material document both those two material document has the same accounting document.
i..e,
material document 1 1367.00 accounting document 1
material documnt 2 1367.00 accounting document 1
however only one material document i can able to display in MIGO with 2734.00 when i display the other document it says document does not exist.
can i suggest to reverse the GRN and then to do it again ? -
Rounding Before a Calculation in a CKF
Hello Gurus!
I am trying to find the difference between two key figures. We'll call them KFA and KFB. KFA has 8 decimal places. KFB has 4 decimal places. What I would like to do is round KFA off to 4 decimal places before I subtract KFA from KFB. I need this to happen because I need to multiply the difference times another key figure.
So for example...
KFA = 1.12345678
KFB = 1.1235
I want KFB - KFA to equal 0 not 0.00004322 so that when I multiply the difference by another key figure I will get zero and not some tiny fraction.
I tried pulling KFA into my query, hiding it, then making a CKF that used KFA but changing the display to four decimal places, and then using the CKF in another calculation. This looked right, but when I multiplied the difference by other numbers you could tell that it wasn't ignoring the 5th - 8th decimal places.
Can anyone give me some advice on how to make this work in Query Designer?That is really close. To get 4 decimal places I would need to use 10000, but I get your point. However, this is what is happening....
Let's assume that...
KFA = 2.08100081
KFB = 2.0860
CKF = KFB - KFA
CKF1 = (TRUNC(CKF * 10000) / 10000 )
CKF = 0.00499919
CKF1 = 0.0049
The answer should be 0.0050 because I wanted KFA rounded to four decimal places meaning...
KFA = 2.0810
KFB = 2.0860
2.0860 - 2.0810 = 0.0050 -
Import Scenario|MIGO no excise calculated|BED SED ECess SHECess all are 0|
In Import scenario, when i am doing MIGO after LIV for Custom vendor, system is not capturing excise invoice , infact its showing all excise components like BED,AED,ECS & SHECess etc "Zero" value. Kindly help me out & point me out where i am making mistake..just want to inform..we can take credit on CVD,ECS on custom etc...
Hello,
Indian Import cycle is bit more complicated and SAP is not geared to handle in a straight manner through single MIGO as the cycle consists of multiple vendors.
This requires special Schema to be developed and needs Both FICO and MM consultants to work together.
Imports will have two categories.
Category 1: Bonding and De-bonding cycle ( Freight and Insurance during Bonding and other duties during De-bonding )
Category 2 : Home consumption ( all charges to be accounted at one stage )
Further Import cycle also has two types :
Type 1 for Manufacturing plant ( CENvat credit for certain duties to be availed )
Type 2 for trading plant ( no credit of duties )
In altogether there are 4 procedures to be adopted for the above.
The schema should be such that, at PO stage. We should be able to assign multiple vendors : Import supplier for Items ( foreign currency ) , India customs for Duties ( Indian currency ) , Freight and Insurance separately ( Indian or foreign currency as the case may be ). During schema, duties have to be defiend as VATable and non VATable. Accordingly, accounting posting keys to be defined.
Most important aspect is the FI transactions and mapping it to import cycle. In case of Import cycle, MIRO is done first and then MIGO is carried out later steps.
Payment of Advance to Supplier : Vendor advance and corresponding enctry in GL account, credit Bank a/c , debit Vendor A/c
MIRO is done in Three or four instances ( may be five also if cenvat credit for duties to be taken ).
Step 1:
MIRO -1, Freight vendor : Inventorised : Credit Freight Vendor, debit freight & Insurance clearing account, when money is paid : Debit Vendor, Credit Bank
MIRO -2, Insurance Vendor : Inventorised : Credit Insurance vendor, Debit Freight & Insurance clearing account, when money is paid : Debit Vendor, Credit Bank
MIRO- 3, India customs ( All five duties together ) : Inventorised credit Vendor, Debit Duties clearing account, when money is paid : Debit Vendor, Credit Bank
OR
MIRO - 3, Basic Duties : non vatable : to be inventoriesed, Credit Vendor, Debit Duties clearing account and
MIRO - 4, ED, Edu cess : vatable :, Credit Vendor, Debit vat clearing account, Vat credit through ji1h and non inventorised, hence will not be part of costing, Credit Vat clearing account, Debit VAT account when money is paid : Debit Vendor, Credit Bank
Step 2:
MIGO : to Stores where accenting documents gets generated to the extent of inventorising .All the inventorised values in corresponding GL accounts produces the Product Cost. Debit Inventory
Credit GRIR a/c
Credit Freight & Insurance A/c ( for both freight & Insurance )
Credit Duty clearing a/c ( 3 or % as the case, may be )
Step 3:
MIRO - 4, on Supplier ( Foreign exchange ), Entry to be cancelled against advance paid. While carrying out, the difference in exchange rate also to be passed on to separate GL account. : to be inventgorised.
Credit Vendor a/c, Debit GRIR clearing a/c
Regards
Mahesh Naik -
Excise calculated at migo is wrong
hi friends.
i have maintained tax code for 8%, 2%, 1%, for bed, ecess, and secess respectively and 4% vat
the Bed calculated at migo is wrong, it is calculating little more, what is the procedure to rectify this,
please give all respective hints..
thanks in advance...Hi,
Please check the validity period for tax conditions if you are using TAXINN procedure. -
Excise calculation at MIRO.
Hai all MM gurus,
Please provide the solutions to my requirement,
1. You all are aware that the Indian govt has reduced the excise duty from 16% to 14% for capital goods procurement.This is effective from april onwards.
2.The MM user has parked the invoice document in March 2008, when the excsie rate is 16%. The FI user will post the parked document in May2008. here the excise rate is changed to 14% in J1ID. So the problem is while posting system is picking the current rate. But he has to pass the invoice for 16%.
How to rectify this?.Hi,
Which version you are using ? How Excise invoices are there ?
If they are few numbers you can cancel/reverse the Excise invoices and maintain the correct % and then post the excise invoices again.
Can you elobarate your exact requirement with all data, so tht can suggest some thing.
reg
Durga
*assign points if the info is useful
Maybe you are looking for
-
Problem with '-' (dash) in BEx web analyzer
Hi All, we are having a strange problem with 0BPartner and 0Material. Our BPartner and Material have '-'(dash) sign as part of key. While selecting this BPartner/Material in Bex Analyzer, we do not have any problem, but when we try to select the same
-
No question, but a suggestion RE: Ken Burns
Hey all, I couldn't find an appropriate place to leave "suggestions" for the Apple software gurus who are working on the next version of Final Cut Pro, so i thought I'd air it out here. It seems that many people utilize still photo montages in FCP pr
-
FC - Open source, MXP's, Adobe Bridge?
1) is FC going to be Open source (ever)? 2) Any tech to write MXP's and extentions in standart Adobe way or Eclipse one? 3) Will thare be any connection to bridge? 4) BTW any way to run 2 FC's at the same tyme with different work spaces? Sory for my
-
Using the NAM in a 6513 to monitor RMON on an uplink.
I should be able to gather and monitor rmon statistics using the NAM. When I go into the NAM's monitor mode and look at port stats I get the following error message: No data available. Possible reasons: - Switch community string not configured proper
-
We updated are 2 DC's on Friday Monday the 20th 2015 from 2003 to 2008 server after the update our SharePoint Server stop working and reporting "Cannot connect to the configuration database." Thank you all in advanced, Kevin R. Durler [email protect