Wrong excise calculations in MIRO

Dear All,
we have created a PO and partial MIGO and MIRO has been done and all the entries has been posted correctly. Now while doing MIRO for the remaining partial quantity excise values are calculating wrong in MIRO. GRN has been done and part 1 and part 2 entries also posted. the tax code has 12% , 2% , 1 % and VAT 5.5% . In part 1 and 2 12% amount 2734.00 has been posted. while doing MIRO ED value is calcuating as 1367.00.
i have checked in FTXP and in J1ID the values has not been changed. Kindly suggest how to proceed.
thanks and regards,
RGS

thank you so much..!! i check the table J_1IGRXREF as the per link suggested and found only half of the amount is updated there. i.e., 1367.00
Again i checked the table with the excise invoice number and found two entries of 1367.00 with two material document both those two material document has the same accounting document.
i..e,
material document 1 1367.00 accounting document 1
material documnt 2 1367.00 accounting document 1
however only one material document i can able to display in MIGO with 2734.00 when i display the other document it says document does not exist.
can i suggest to reverse the GRN and then to do it again ?

Similar Messages

Wrong excise duty during miro

sap gurus,
our scenario is we capture excise invoice then migo(GR) then post excise invoice and then after that miro.
In many cases we need to change excise duty in j1iex and then we post excise through j1iex. The changes that we do in excise duty should be reflected in miro coz in our case we do miro after j1iex(post). In few cases system is not reflecting correct excise invoice in miro. during miro system is picking excise as is in PO and not the one changed in ji1ex.
And yes we always do miro after excise post(j1iex). Plz tell me the solution.

In Miro,tax amounts will be calculated according to tax code so if you do changes in J1IEX then it wont' be reflected in invoice.
For dealer vendor you need to tick MRP indicator in miscellaneous tab of excise invoice(J1IEX),enter excise base value,
excise duties for capturing,refer it in migo & later post excise invoice.
In MIRO change base amount without excise duties,select ed tax code,now you can see orginal excise duties captured in j1iex will be reflected in MIRO.
Refer note 1104456 - Use of MRP indicator for capturing excise duties from dealer

Excise calculation at MIRO.

Hai all MM gurus,
Please provide the solutions to my requirement,
1. You all are aware that the Indian govt has reduced the excise duty from 16% to 14% for capital goods procurement.This is effective from april onwards.
2.The MM user has parked the invoice document in March 2008, when the excsie rate is 16%. The FI user will post the parked document in May2008. here the excise rate is changed to 14% in J1ID. So the problem is while posting system is picking the current rate. But he has to pass the invoice for 16%.
How to rectify this?.

Hi,
Which version you are using ? How Excise invoices are there ?
If they are few numbers you can cancel/reverse the Excise invoices and maintain the correct % and then post the excise invoices again.
Can you elobarate your exact requirement with all data, so tht can suggest some thing.
reg
Durga
*assign points if the info is useful

Excise Calculated on Freight MIRO

Dear Gurus,
I am having the issue when Excise duty is being calculated on Freight suggested in PO while doing MIRO, Altough it is not calculated in PO.
I am using the TAXINN Procedure.
Please suggest how to avoid excise calculation on delivery amt in PO at the time of MIRO.
Because most of the time service tax is involved on delivery amt.
PO
PO Value-             1000
BED-                      140
ECS-                          3
SECS-                        1
SUBTOTAL-           1144
VAT-                         46
SUBTOTAL-           1190
FREIGHT-                119
TOTAL-                  1309
MIGO
STOCK-               1119+
GR/IR                    1000-
Freight Clearing       119-
Excise Posted as per PO
MIRO POSTING-
1. Goods-
VENDOR-                                1190-
GR/IR-                                    1000+
CENVAT CLEARING-               144+
VAT-                                        46+
2. MIRO Freight-
VENDOR-                                   141-
Freight Clearing                           119+
CENVAT CLEARING-                    17+
VAT                                               5+
When i am posting MIRO For Goods items + Planned Delivery Cost still the excise is being calculated on excise amt & the entries are same above........
Please suggest
Thanks
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Dec 16, 2008 4:14 PM
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Dec 16, 2008 4:15 PM
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Dec 17, 2008 7:12 AM

hi,
use zero tax code at MIRO for freight clearing.
regards,
sujit

Cancellation of Excise invoice after MIRO

Hi Everybody,
How do i cancel the Excise Invoice after MIRO.my scenario is Net Inclusive of Excise duty. the procedures which i followed as follows,
1.PO with Zero Tax code > J1iex(captured the Excise Invoice)>GR which refers EI>Posted EI.
After posting EI i found thats wrongly captured then i did canceled the EI as follows
2. GR Cancellation>Posted EI against canceled GR>Canceled the EI.
Now my RG23A got cleared.then i did again step 1 as well as MIRO.After did miro again i found that captured EI is Wrong. I have to followed below procedure to Cancel the EI,
3.Cancell the MIRO document in MR8M>GR Cancellation>Posted EI against canceled GR>Canceled the EI.
When i tried to POST EI one pop up message is coming i.e status of EI one is for INPROCESS another one one is for Posted .I chose Inprocess and entered i was getting following Error
No Part I exists for availing credit in excise invoice 364 2008
Message no. 4F112
If i Chose POSTED i was getting following error,
Excise invoice 364 2008 has already been posted for vendor 103769
Message no. 4F107.
Can anybody tell me where i'm wrong what procedure i need to follow
Regards
Govindaraj

hi
plz check the document year for inprocess and posted doc
now steps for excise invoice cancellation will be as follows
1 cancel MIRO document with MR8M
2 cancel MIGO document in MIGO
3 goto J1IEX choose post here give the excise invoice no of the document (u will get this no from table J_1IEXCDTL and field DOCNO)
4 now in misclinious tab give the rejection code and simulate u will find all the duties are reversed (compare with previous posting)
5 now ur invoice is cancelled and u can go for new GR and new postings
regards
kunal

Wrong excise Base in Excise tab in Item details in MIGO for ImportPurchases

Hi All,
We are facing an issue with wrong excise base in transaction MIGO item datails in excise tab,
Info:Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty.
Case:
In PO ,
             Value in USD     Ex Rate          Value In INR
Assesable value     101                            52.4659          5299.0559
IN Basic customs     10.1          52.4659          529.90559
Sub (*** Value + BCD     111.1          52.4659          5828.96149
IN CVD          11.11                            52.4659          582.896149
In this case the excise Base in system has to be Assassable value +BCD= 5828.96
But in MIGO in excise tab excise Base is 5,776.50--> which is wrong.
Please help in correcting the same in system.
All relevant configuration and default conditions are maintained in systm.
Regards,
Vijaykumar P

> Info:Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty.
> In this case the excise Base in system has to be Assassable value +BCD= 5828.96
Hi, I think your system is showing correct,
Base at the time MIGO will not be Assassable value +BCD, It will only be Assassable value,
Your 1st point is right "Excise base for CVD is Assassable value +Basic customs Duty"
Assassable value consist of Material cost, Insurance, Freight, 1% Landing charge etc. Check with your Imports team & Excise team for the same.
Apart from that, if your concern is about values then just check the exchange rates & the Miro posting what you have did.

TAXINN - Excise Calculation - FM

Dear Friends,
in my company we are using TAXINJ , but now we shifted to TAXINN ..
for Excise Calculation i used the FM - "J_1I6_DETERMINE_EXCISE_RATE"
but i think its calcu.. only for TAXINJ . in new TAXINN its not giving me output..
In TAXINJ its depends on the Chapter id that people has to maintain every time ..
but in TAXINN they r not maintaining Chapter id ...
without chapter id this FM is nt working ... so anyone can help me in this scenario......
Actually i m preparing Purchase Register from FI Side........

Hi Manish,
The main reason behind the error:
The value of the document input parameter 'AssessableValue' is missing
which you are geting in the freight charges is CENVAT code is not allowed at document level freight charges, nothing wrong with the formula.
thats why in my earlier comments i suggested you to enter packing charges at row level.
Anyways your issue is solved tht is important.
swap

VAT/Excise calculation - map pricing & tax procedures

Dear,
Pls tell me how to map my blw senerio;
In pricing procedure, i have
A- Gross price
B- Handlying charges
C- Excise on A+B,
here i need to calculate my exise on A+B values and it flows (C) frm tax procedure (taxinn). until here i'm ok.
D - A BC
E - Insurance (defined in pricing proce) on D value,
here i'm unbale to map my price, since the sytem taking A+ B price only, its not taking my D values... I need to map pricing & tax procedures, since Gross price, Han. charges and insurance flows frm pricing proce and Excise frm tax procedure.
Anyone has right solution, pls guide me...

Hello sapjj
Here in your issue, u have to maintain a dummy condition type for excise calculation in your pricing procedure. The excise on A+B will be calculated in pricing procedure itself and not it flows from tax procedure.You have to make a condition type in pricing procedure and mark it as statistical in the procedure so that it doesn't get added to material value.
you are ok till gross price and handling charges, right?
Then you include your dummy condition type for excise amount calculation.Then in the next step calculate a subtotal without giving any condition type and maintaining 'S' in the subtotal field in the pricing procedure.
In the next step include the insurance condition type and calculate it on the subtotal.
This will help
Regards
Gregory Mathews

Exit or BADI when Tax Calculation in MIRO from Purchase order

Hi Gurus,
I Need a Exit or BADI when Tax Calculation in MIRO from Purchase order.
The problem is the tax is automatically calculated from tax code in PO but I want it to be calculated
from PO condition. Is there any exit available by which I can modify the value of tax when ticking the check box of tax calculation in MIRO.

BADI has method COPY_DRSEG_SELKZ but since there only importing paramters and no exporting or changing parametrs you cannot change the values of rseg here.
Try using proper Implicit enahncement by debugging .
For implicit enhancement check
Re: How do we search enhancement point/section
Edited by: Gautam Totekar on May 29, 2009 5:56 PM

About Excise Calculation

Hi Friends
In One My client i have following problem regarding
excise calculation
Basically in import purchase.Excise calculation(Duty, Cess,ED cess) is done asper goverment rule.This Calculation is depends on Assesalbe value .
Actaul cost price for product is diffrent.
on cost price again vat calculation is done .
When sale of this item is done only excsie calculation is passe d to customer .and selling price is again deffrent.on selling price vat calcultion is done.
how do i handel this sceanerio in Business on how i link particular purchse to particular sale.
Pls help as early as possible

Sachin,
The ED and others should be calculated on Assessable Value. But the Vat should be calculated on unit price.
I hope this is the scenario.
In A/R or AP document, there is a field called assessable value. you should activate this in thru form settings.
The Tax formula for ED should be like this: The Base Amount should be set as Assessable Value.
For Vat base amount you should give the formula as Qty*Price + ED Amount.
You can get these formulaes in SBO Demo Company itself. Hope u understood this.
If the Unit Price includes ED credit, You have to create a UDF for capturing the Base amount and link it to the tax formulae. The Unit Price filed should be assigned formatted search for Unit Price Less ED Amount.
Still if u r not understanding please mail me to [email protected]

Using concessional excise calculation under taxinn

dear all
we are evalution taxinn in ecc6. based on the sap document we have configured the normal taxinn and the same is shown in the sales order.
but in the present setup, the client needs to modify the excise duty at the order level rather than changing the value at VK11 --> JEXP.
did anyone work on the concessional excise calculation under taxinn ? and if yes how did they comply with the concessional excise calculation requirement
full point will be given
regards

dear saurabh,
thanks for the reply
the first logic will not work as the client is SOX compliant compnay and the values for pricing procedures should always come from vk11
the 2nd alt will also not work with the client becasue of the first reason.
plz continue the good work

Excise Duty not calculated at MIRO

Hi
We have upgraded the patch level of SAP_APPL from 10 to 11. Now, in PO we have assigned a tax code for calculation of excise duty at 14.42%. In the tax details in PO Items, system is showing the calculation of excise duties correctly.When the excise invoice from vendor is posted through J1IEX . Here the system is passing the entries
BDE Dr
Cess Dr
SECESS Dr
       Cenvat Clearing A/c Cr
When we do MIRO, system is passing the following entries
GR/IR Dr
     Vendor A/c Cr
The correct entries to be passed shoudl be
GR/IR Dr
Cenvat Clearing Dr
         Vendor A/c Cr
When we were on patch 10 for SAP_APPL, system was passing the entries correctly. However, after the upgradation, system is not capturing the excise details. We have maintained all the related configuration in J1ID and also maintained the condition records in FV11.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Hi,
Check whether "GR based IV" is active for the PO line item under "Invoice" Tab. If not then active and check or do a complete new cycle with this indicator as active and check.
Also check that in MIRO, you are selecting the tax code of PO at Header level in "Basic Data" Tab also.

Wrong excise value is calculated in billing doc. = VF01.

Dear All ,
I have created a billing doc for a STO , now my price of 1 ton is Rs 57328.94 & in billing the Con for exc is JEXP it is for,14 % but the exc cal culating as Rs 8329.61 , instead of Rs 8026.05 here the wrong calculated Rs 8329.61 is 14.529 % of Rs 57328.94 .so i m in VF03 now selected the cond type & clicked on detail icon here what i see that the a screen opens for header cond. details , here in cond details tab the amount coming as 14 % , Cond base value is Zero & Cond value is Rs 57328.94 , After this on the same scren i had clikced on Go to -
> cond record --> here also 14 % is given then how the system is calculating 14.529 % instead of 14 % .
Rgds
sap12

in the STO under cond tab at item level i had clicked on analysis tab then the con appearing are as under --->
Condition type     Message     Description
P101     213     Amount copied from material valuation data
FRB1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
FRC1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
FRA1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y017     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y018     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y019     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y020     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y015     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Total Cost     200     Subtotal
Here there is no JEXP , now as u wrote thjat to check the excise rate in J1ID -
> there is no excise rate made for this material , after this ---> in exceptional exc rate there are no entries., now pl guide that what to check .
Rgds
sap12

Wrong VAT amount in MIRO (Excise duty inclusive case)

Hi All,
I have created purchase order with excise duty as inclusive. I have captured the vendor excise invoice & posted it. Upto this point all is working fine.
When i am going to do MIRO ,the vat amount is also showing correct ( calculated on Base price+ ED).
But when i am changing the tax code ,the VAT is calculated on Base price only.
It is not considering the amount of Excise duty posted .
Besides excise duty inclusive case ,when we are changing the tax code in MIRO where certain percentage for the conditions is maintained like (821+vat 5%) ,VAT amount is correct.Only problem is with the excise duty inclusive cae.
All the configuration & transaction data is properly maintained .
Please guide ,
Regards,
SAP MM INDIA

Create a seperate tax code for dealer with ed + vat combination,
here maintain tax rates for excise condition types as zero.
Maintain that tax code in p.o.Do GR as suggested in sap note
See Note 1104456 - Use of MRP indicator for capturing excise duties from dealer for more information.
In MIRO,Enter base amount removing excise duty values,select tax code only in header.
Reply given by p.singh is also very important point to note regarding VAT condition type.

Wrong Excise Duty amount in MIRO

Hi Gurus,
I have done MIGO , in which I have captured Excise Duties as BED - 35000.00, 2%ECS- 700.00, 1%S&H Cess - 350.00, but in MIRO it is showing as BED - 35000.00, 2%ECS- 35000.00, 1%S&H Cess - 350.00.
My client is using TAXINJ, we have recently added two condition types as JEC1 for 2% & JAX2 for 1% and assigned to tax Code. In PO , I have maintained the tax rate in J1ID as 1421. In PO Invoice tab Condition Value is shown correctly against as BED (JMO1)- 100%, - 35000.00 , (JEC1) ECS-14% - 700.00 & (JAX2)S&H Cess-1%- 350.00 but in Amount column it shows as BED (JMO1)- 100%, (JEC1) ECS-14% & (JAX2) S&H Cess-1%.
System is taking value as 35000.00 for 2%ECS instead of 700.00
Pl. guide
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Vikas

u have to maintain the JEC1 as 2% in FV11, as per ur query u specified it is 14%.Check.
regards,
BSK

Wrong excise calculations in MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for