P4310 unit cost issue

Dear Sir/madam
we are facing the below issue
When entering a Purchase Requisition or Purchase Order detail line, on the exit of the line after entering Item / Qty, the unit cost is defaulted to 3 for any Item.
how can we make the unit cost not to be default to 3 ?

Price/Rate 3 is also coming for Purchase Requisition ?
Please review following link for Item Price for IR.
(1) Review Step 6 Item Price Information.
Raghunath Kashyap Oracle Shopping Mall : Internal Requisition Setup in Oracle Apps
EXPLORING ERP: What Are The Steps Required To Setup An Internal Requisition In Purchasing?

Similar Messages

How to get unit cost for finished goods in prod order

HI all,
IN a production order of type PP04, there is cost analysis you can get from CO03. This shows the cost for finished goods and BOM components. Would anyone know how the cost for finished goods are calculated ? The issue i have is that the unit cost of the finished goods is not correct. It is higher than what it should be. I looked at the moving avg price at material master but the cost used in calculation is different than in material master. Can anyone shed light how finished goods are calculated and why it is picking up a higher unit cost ? Where is the higher cost coming from for finished goods material as shown in CO03 ? The BOM materials are picking unit cost correctly. Would this have anything to do with cost settlement ?
thank you.
joyce

Hi,
Finished goods price will depend on BOM componenet price, activity price and overhead price. Check whether this prices are picking correctly or not.
Regards,
Sreekanth

MTL MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS having zero unit cost

Hi All,
For some of the POs, we are getting zero unit cost in the Receiving Account, but rest of the POs are working fine and correct data is populated.
This is not with any particular Org as well. Any idea what can be the reason so that the cost will be zero in there.
I am new to costing/Finance module, so please let me know if I am not making sense or missing any information that will be important to get the solution.
Thanks,

Amit
What is your costing method in that organization? Can you please check the price in the PO for that item which is giving you this issue?
This can happen: If your price in the PO is Zero and you are using any costing method when you receive this is what happens:
Cr Accrual Account @Po Price
Dr Receiving Account @Po Price (could be Zero)
When you deliver to Inventory depending on the costing method value will change:
In std costing
Cr Receiving @ po price (zero)
Cr Purchase Price Variance @st cost
Dr Inventory @ std cost
In avg costing
Cr Receiving cost @ Po Price
Dr Inventory @ po price
But the cost will be recalculated as
(onhand qty*current cost+po qty*po_price)/(onhand_qty+po_qty). So if the cost was 100 and onhand was 1 and if the po qty is 1 and po price is Zero cost will become 50.
Thanks
Nagamohan

Simulation Costing / Unit costing / Product cost estimation

Hi;
Can somebody tell me more about unit costing i.e. estimation ??
Process is as follows;
Creation of quotation -
Create BOM according to customer specifications--attach it to material for which quotation created--take costing rungo to unit costing---- all data will be copied to unit cost estimate------change manually in estimation sheet as per estimator requirement- save it. -
cost will update pricing of quotation.
But now my problem is BOM explosion at unit costing sheet is first level only but I need all materials of every level of BOM.
How to get all materials in unit costing sheet Pl. let me know?????????
Thanks in advance!!!
Avinash
9822136556

Jason - have another look -
The cost estimate nuber that links MBEW to KEKO and then KEPH does not change - I just checke the 10 year histoy of one number, there are bom and routing changes, different versions and recently, different valuation variants. all of them use the cost estimate number that is located in MBEW
The distinctive uniqueness of a cost estimate is the combination of: Reference Obj.; ProdCostEst.No.; Costing Type; Costing Date; Costing Version; Valuation Variant; Additive Costs
CKIS uses the same key with the addition of Ledter and item number,
regards
Alhea
Edited by: Althea Madigan on Aug 26, 2010 9:23 AM
PS - Jason- thank you for your comment -- and forcing me to review this data - - I believe that I have just solved a high priority reporting issue - I hadn't noticed (or bothered to look at) the TRANSFER Co Estimate no - Thank you very much for pushing the think past the usual "here's the answer."
Edited by: Althea Madigan on Aug 26, 2010 9:34 AM

Activity cost impact on Target Cost issue

Dear All,
Earlier this issue was posted in PP forum but didnt get the answer
Kindly follow the link.
[Activity cost impact on Target Cost issue;
Regards,
Shayam

Dear Shyam,
Normally the Total costs in activity price calculation (KP26) are taken and multiplied with quantity and charged off to the receivers irrespective of the type of costs i.e. whether it is a Fixed cost or variable cost. We don't have functionality to consider the Fixed costs to spread across the output and take the per unit value accordingly. The Fixed costs in kp26 are updated just to reflect the costs in the cost component structure as Fixed costs.
Kind Regards
Umapathi G

Unit of issue in COGI

Hi Experts,
I have unit of issue (in BOM and Matl Master) which is Alt UOM, different from Base unit of measure. While doing MFBF, I am getting qty of component in Alt UOM but actually system is withdrawing components in Base Unit of measure only. This is resulting in postprocessing records - COGI in base UOM. What should I do so that system will issue component in Alt UOM.
Thanks
Suresh

Dear,
Do not worry about unot of measure...system will issue the material in the unit you have maintained in BOM. More over whatever the unit you have enetered, systme will calculate the alternate unit qty and updates the stock. Usually MMBE shoews the stock in all units...but material is valuated w.r.t base unit of measure. Hence system willcalcuate the al unit and updates FI documents to updating the stock.
Hence system will calculate the unit conversion you maintained in material master
Can we know what problem you are facing in post processing?

Change/ removal of Unit of Issue in Material master Work scheduling view

Hi,
Is there a way to remove Unit of Issue from Work scheduling view? it is giving error message as "this is being used in BOM". Even if we put deletion indicator also it is showing same error message.
Regards,
R. Srinivasan

Do a CS15 for the material in question and make sure you go in the BOM and select the material and click on delete/remove you can then do this.
I have tested it and it works.
Regards
Adeel

Error when changing unit of Issue in material master

Hi,
When i am trying to change Unit of issue in Qualitymanagement view of a material using MM02 transaction, we got error message - "The unit of issue cannot be changed because the material is used in a BOM-------Mesage no. M3214"
Can anyone suggest what is the reason behind this. ?. how to avoid this error.
Thanks in advance.

HI Aditya,
"The unit of issue cannot be changed because the material is used in a BOM-------Mesage no. M3214"
The reason is that material is used as a component in BOMs with the present unit of issue as a unit in the bom line item.Unless you change that bom line item unit to its base unit ,system will not allow you to change the unit of issue in QM.
First check in which BOMs the material you were changing is used as a component.this you can do in transaction CS15.
then change the unit of measure used for the material in bom line item to base unit of measure.if one only one BOM is there change in CS02.if more BOMS are there do mass change in CS20.
Then try to change the unit o fissue.now system will allow you to do the changes.

Unit Cost is not Populating in Sales Order Line Level for OPM Enabled Org

Dear All,
This is to inform you that Unit Cost is not populating in Sales Order Lines. Ideally it should pick from OPM financials, but whenever i am running Cost Update it is throwing error. We need to pull out Unit Cost for Sales Analysis Report. Please suggest on the same ASAP. What are the steps needs be followed to populate the Unit Cost. Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards,
Patrick

Hi
I think it will pick from PRICE list. Why don't to you try by keeping this item in the mentioned Price list.
Regards
Raj

Change unit cost AP Invoice line based from a Goods Receipt PO base entry

Hi,
Im using SAP B1 2007A PL 46 with B1DE 2.0
SCENARIO:
(1) I have a goods receipt PO that has a line for an item with a quantity but 0 unit cost.
(2) At a later stage, via DI, I create a AP Invoice and set the line BaseType, BaseEntry and BaseLine to point to the goods receipt from step 1.
REQUIREMENT:
When creating the AP INV, I would like to change the unit cost for the line to something other than 0. I find however, that because I have based the AP INV Line a base document, I cannot override the line price for the line before calling the APINV.Add() method. After calling the APINV.Add() method, the APINV Line still has the price of 0 even though I set it, for example, to 100. (see example below)
                    docAPInv.Lines.BaseType = (int)BoAPARDocumentTypes.bodt_PurchaseDeliveryNote;
                    docAPInv.Lines.BaseEntry = GoodsReceiptPODocEntry;
                    docAPInv.Lines.BaseLine = 0;
                    docAPInv.Lines.Price = 100; //NEW PRICE            SEEMS TO HAVE NO EFFECT
                int res = docAPInv.Add();
                if (res < 0)
                    Success = false;
                    ErrorReason = B1Connections.diCompany.GetLastErrorDescription();
                    break;

Hello,
If your system is installed as 2007 (no upgrade from 2004/2005)
-> use the UnitPrice instead of Price field.
If you have upgraded from 2005/2005 versions,
->You can choose between the UnitPrice and Price fields up to the Customizing settings.
See SAP Note 1334050
Regards,
J.

Special MTO Scenario - Costing Issues

Hi,
Not sure if I should post it here or in the FI / CO forum, but here it is ...
I'm in the process of implementing APO in a Aerospace company in Montréal, Canada and we're stuck on an Account Assignment Planning, and Product Costing issue.
Today, all demand / production / movements / costing is done by creating a Project Network.
Here are the current settings:
- Create a project with activities for each major "line section" for major components.
- Each activity has a component allocated to it
- Each activity has a different WBS element assigned to it.
- All production orders/purchase orders/goods movements are created/posted against the WBS elements.
- All stock for MTO parts are assigned to the WBS element
In order to provide better integration with APO and bring more flexibility in the Planning and Simulation processes, we were hoping to stop using Project Networks as the trigger for demand / planning / execution. The idea was to use Sales Orders (or Customer Independent Requirements - CIR) to generate the demand and run APO and MRP planning from it. The special stock segment now becomes linked to the sales order (or CIR) which changes alot of thing in the accounting documents and costs elements in the whole planning and execution processes.
Here is what we were hoping to achieve in order to limit impacts on finance :
- we are implementing APO and would like planning to be performed without using project networks.
- we would like to have planned orders for the top level for long term and be able to trigger the purchasing of long lead time items.
- we would like all goods movements (PO reception, GI to production order etc, ) to be posted to WBS elements
- we would like all production orders to settle to WBS elements
We tried different scenarios with different account assignments categories, but could not find one that fits the bill :
1) we tried using account assignment category "D" which allows assignment to sales order and WBS element. We created CIR as demand.
The problem is the stock is non-valuated which resulted in having no accounting documents for goods issue to production order.
2) we tried account assignment category "Q" with using CIR as demand. We had one WBS element assignment in the CIR. When we changed the WBS value in planned orders to represent each "line section" we ended up with duplicate demand in the original segment and the new segment.
So, is there a scenario with valuated stock that would allow us to do a make-to-order process that would post all costs to WBS?
Thanks,
Marc

Hi, sorry for the title confusion ... I cannot change it anymore.
I'm not sure I understand what you are proposing.
In our case, the problem is not really linked to the CIFing to APO but more on the Account Assignment Category in ECC and the Customer / Project Stock Segment in MRP.
Since we have a multiple level BOM and that the intermediate levels need to be associate with different WBS element according to major parts of the aircraft.
Here is an example :
Aicraft -- Has its own BOM with major parts as sub assemblies,
Major Parts -- Each Major Parts needs to be linked to a different WBS for costing purpose.
Minor Sub Assemblies -- All cost of producing the Minor Sub Assemblies should be tracked inside the Major Parts WBS.
Components -- All components costs and accounting documents should be tracked inside the Major Parts WBS.
We know that by using a project Network for the Aircraft Level we could create activities for each Major Parts with different WBS, but since we want to do planning in APO, we were hoping to not use PS has a scheduling basis. The integration of PS in APO is still not used a lot and the flexibility of Projects in planning processes is not great.
In resume, we are trying to create the demand from a Sales Order or CIR, but manage costs and accounting documents within WBS for all level in order to limit impacts on the Finance Department.

Unit Cost of non stock material - Hubwoo Catalogue

Hi Team,
There is one requirement to transfer the the cost of matrial from SAP PM to ArcFM. Here the materials are assigned to the operations in the PM order. Here we want to transfer the service cost and material cost of the particular operation to the ArcFM ( ie an external design tool) to estmate the total cost involved for the particular operation.
Here the unit cost of the stock material can be get from the material master. But for nonstock material, a hubwoo catalogue is maitained. How do we get the unit cost for the this material?
There is an interfece we have to develop to transfer the service cost and material cost from the SAP to ArcFM. Hence we have to get the unit cost of the non stock material here.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Shyjith

Hi,
Yes, you are right but in material master price is not updating, many times I have been assigned the same material as a non stock and at every time I have maintained the planned price on order level but it is still maintained as "0" value in material master,
what is the standard process?
what settings need to be made to get automatically planned price or last purchased price for a non stock material?

Report gives stock in unit of issue

Hi,
Mb52 gives stock in basic unit of measure .
Is any other report where i want stock in unit of issue with list of material.
Regards,
Rajendra D. Sawant

hi,
you can see from mmbe for only one material for different units.
best regards,

Unit costing for materials assigned to activity - for material cost plannin

The requirement is that material cost to the company will vary depending upon the project/customer. Eg.: Material cost = basic material cost + a % for P&F + 2 % for Clearance + a % for excise + 2 % for insurance + a % for Customs
It can be a % or a lump-sum value. It can be all the components listed or part of them. This will be project specific.
Hence the following preference for material cost planning is required:
1. Material cost based on quotation or Purchase order - If quote/PO is not available, then
2.Material cost based on unit costing done for the material in the project - If this is not available, then
3. material cost from material master depending on price indicator i.e. Std cost or Moving average price
We are working with valuated project stock.
SAP Help says"
"Prices are calculated in one of the following ways:
u2022     Using the strategy in the valuation variant
u2022     Manually, using the invoicing plan
u2022     Using unit costing"
But how to get the cost as per the priority required when these three options are there is not clear.
I have tried to work with valuation variant in the costing variant assigned to Network. No valuation strategy explicitly refers to unit costing of material.
During various testings, at times, unit costing of material gets updated as planned cost; at times not. What triggers in also not clear.
Pl. clarify
Thanks and regards
A.Saravanan

Hi All
I have psoted to service market place and got the reply; we have implemented also.
there were 2 suggestiosn:
1. Valuation price with user exit - (EXIT_SAPLCK21_002) - This user exit has to be implemented; we have implemented - it is working. But this is taking effect when overhead calculation is done - this we rae managing that way now
2. Alternatively you can try to use BAdI VALUATION_CK.: This BADI is not editable by us now; SAP has not released for our editing!
The problem is solved although
There is one more clarification required:
As SAP Help documentation: -> Unit costing is used instead of strategy sequence, but not in between steps of strategy.
How to get this done ? right now we are using the strategy - inbetween steps of strategy with user exit
Thanks and regards
A.Saravanan

Unit of Issue not considered in Excise Register Entries in Std SAP

Dear Experts ,
I have a material Base UoM is KG
i procured 100 KG
the Unit of issue for the same is G(grams)
now the consumption of 100 G was booked
Excise registers shows the following entries :
qty rcvd : 100 ( there is no unit )
qty issued :100
balance : 0
whilst the balance shud be 99 KG
Pls give ur inputs
Regards
Anis

I donot have any problem with reciepts
My problem is with issue .
i have been suggested to use the user exit   J_1I7_USEREXIT_J1I5_VALIDATE
for which the coding needs to be done .
The same was done as under :
FUNCTION J_1I7_USEREXIT_J1I5_VALIDATE.
""Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*"     VALUE(RCPTISSRSN) TYPE J_1IPART1-RCPTISSRSN OPTIONAL
*" TABLES
*"      T_MSEG STRUCTURE MSEG OPTIONAL
TABLES
     T_MSEG STRUCTURE MSEG OPTIONAL
tables:j_1ipart1.
data:it_mseg like t_mseg occurs 0 with header line.
if sy-tcode = 'J1I5'.
move-corresponding t_mseg to j_1ipart1.
j_1ipart1-menge = t_mseg-menge.
j_1ipart1-meins = t_mseg-meins.
modify j_1ipart1 ."where mblnr = t_mseg-mblnr and zeile = t_mseg-zeile.
endif.
ENDFUNCTION.
The logic is to put an entry for J_1IPART1-MENGE & J_1IPART1-MEINS from
MSEG-MEINS & MSEG-MEINS instead of the default used in the system ( MSEG-ERFMG & MSEG-ERFME)
But the above doesnt work.
Pls do help.
Regards
Anis

P4310 unit cost issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for