Pages program is showing washed out page

Trying to use a template in my Pages program - yet it shows a "washed out" page.... Yet when I print and preview it shows all items.  What is wrong?  Frustrated - this has never happened until now! Help

Hi..
By posting in the Pages community your topic will be seen by more Pages users for feedback.
You can do that here.

Similar Messages

  • Dialog programming, data being washed out in TAB Control

    Hi,
         i am working on dialog programming , in which i am using Table Control  for user input (data is not coming from database table) . everything is going well till assignment of data to internal table but when
    control goes to PBO by any means like pressing ENTER etc. then data being washed out.
    PROCESS BEFORE OUTPUT.
      MODULE TC_CONTROL.
      LOOP AT it_data
             INTO wa_data
             WITH CONTROL tc_control
             CURSOR tc_control-current_line.
        MODULE tc_control_get_lines.
      ENDLOOP.
    PROCESS AFTER INPUT.
    LOOP AT IT_DATA.
        CHAIN.
          FIELD WA_DATA-FREPS_N.
          FIELD wa_data-TOEPS_N.
          FIELD wa_data-PRCH_A.
          FIELD wa_data-SRVC_AMT .
          FIELD wa_data-ACCNT_C.
          FIELD wa_data-AMT_D.
          FIELD wa_data-NARR_X.
          FIELD wa_data-CRPRD_N.
          MODULE tc_control_modify ON CHAIN-REQUEST.
        ENDCHAIN.
      ENDLOOP.
    *Abap program
    MODULE TC_CONTROL OUTPUT.
    DESCRIBE TABLE it_data LINES tc_control-lines.
    ENDMODULE.                 " TC_CONTROL  OUTPUT
    CONTROLS: TC_CONTROL TYPE TABLEVIEW USING SCREEN 1000,
              TC_CONTROL1 TYPE TABLEVIEW USING SCREEN 1000.
    DATA:     G_TC_CONTROLS_LINES  LIKE SY-LOOPC,
              G_TC_CONTROLS_LINES1  LIKE SY-LOOPC.
    *&      Module  tc_control_get_lines  OUTPUT
          text
    MODULE tc_control_get_lines OUTPUT.
    g_tc_controls_lines = sy-loopc.
    move-corresponding it_data to wa_data.
    ENDMODULE.                 " tc_control_get_lines  OUTPUT
    MODULE tc_control_modify INPUT.
    move-corresponding wa_data to it_data.
    MODIFY it_data
        FROM wa_data
        INDEX tc_control-current_line.
    append it_data.
    clear it_data.
    ENDMODULE.                 " tc_control_modify  INPUT
    Please suggest me any clue.
    Thanks in advance
    vijay dwivedi

    Hi ,
    I have understood the problem.
    In your ABAP code replace all the occurrrences of wa_data  with the structurename.
    Use the TABLES keyword to declare the structure .That structure will be same as
    reference table of the table control .
    Here the structure is SPFLI.
    Check the bellow code , it will resolve the issue.
    ABAP code - -
    program  zsdn.
    tables spfli.  " Declare the structure
    data : it_data like table of spfli with header line,
    *wa_data TYPE spfli,  " commented
    w_i type i.
    *CONTROLS TC_CONTROL TYPE TABLEVIEW USING SCREEN 100.
    controls: tc_control type tableview using screen 1000,
    tc_control1 type tableview using screen 1000.
    data: g_tc_controls_lines like sy-loopc,
    g_tc_controls_lines1 like sy-loopc.
    module tc_control output.
      describe table it_data lines tc_control-lines.
    endmodule. " TC_CONTROL OUTPUT
    module tc_control_get_lines output.
      g_tc_controls_lines = sy-loopc.
      move-corresponding it_data to spfli.
    endmodule. " tc_control_get_lines OUTPUT
    module tc_control_modify input.
      move-corresponding spfli to it_data.
      modify it_data
      from spfli
      index tc_control-current_line.
      append it_data.
      clear it_data.
    endmodule. " tc_control_modify INPUT
    module status_0100 output.
      set pf-status 'STAT'.
    *  SET TITLEBAR 'xxx'.
    endmodule.                 " STATUS_0100  OUTPUT
    module user_command_0100 input.
      case sy-ucomm.
        when 'BACK' or 'EXIT' or 'CANCEL'.
          leave to screen 0.
      endcase.
    endmodule.                 " USER_COMMAND_0100  INPUT
    *&      Module  POPLATE_TABLE  OUTPUT
    *       text
    module poplate_table output.
      if it_data is initial.
        select * from spfli into table it_data.
      endif.
    endmodule.                 " POPLATE_TABLE  OUTPUT
    Screen code (Scr no 1000) - -
    PROCESS BEFORE OUTPUT.
      MODULE status_0100.
      MODULE poplate_table.
      MODULE tc_control.
      LOOP AT it_data WITH CONTROL tc_control CURSOR w_i.
        MODULE tc_control_get_lines.
      ENDLOOP.
    PROCESS AFTER INPUT.
      MODULE user_command_0100.
      LOOP AT it_data.
        MODULE tc_control_modify ON CHAIN-REQUEST.
    *    ENDCHAIN.
      ENDLOOP.
    Regards
    Pinaki

  • Why are my images so washed out in pages compared to how they look in Photoshop?

    I am new to Pages. I have some beautiful .jpeg CMYK files I am importing into a Pages template, and they look completely washed out in pages compared to how they look in Photoshop. Is this just a preview mode or will they look this bad if I print the file at a print on demand site like HP Magcloud?
    Thanks!
    O

    Hmmmmm...
    Well, I'm not sure about what my color management is set to in photoshop, but its color LCD for the mac in system preferences. As the printer is a print on demand site its not so easy to run tests. The thing is, they want the images as a PDF, but I am loosing quality pringing it into pages, would it be different if i created the PDF directly from photoshop (is that even possible?)
    paper options are:
    60#, 80# or 100# matte text stock options with Saddle Stitch Binding
    80# premium cover stock, 80# matte text stock with Perfect Binding
    the site says this:
    If you are creating your PDF in a different program like Microsoft Word or Publisher, or Apple Pages, you’ll want to save your images based on whether they were CMYK or RGB to begin with. If they were CMYK to begin with, they should be saved as CMYK. If they were RGB to begin with, saving them with an sRGB colorspace will give you the best output.
    I already changed them in photoshop from RGB to CMYK, is it too late to change back? where is the sRGB option anyway?
    Thanks,
    O

  • I just updated to 10.8.4 and my mail program is showing a series of boxes with AAAAs inside them instead of the email addresses. Also when on Safari web pages are displaying the same AAAAAs instead of type. Firefox displays fine. Can someone help me?

    I just updated to 10.8.4 and my mail program is showing a series of boxes with AAAAs inside them instead of the email addresses. Also when on Safari web pages are displaying the same AAAAAs instead of type. Firefox displays fine. Can someone help me?

    Restart your Mac and immediately hold down the Shift key when you hear the startup chime to boot into Safe Mode. Keep holding the Shift key until you see a progress bar towards the bottom of the screen. You can let go of the Shift key at that point.
    OS X asks you to log in (you will get this screen on a Safe Mode boot even if your Mac is set to automatically log in). Let the Mac finish booting to the desktop and then restart normally. This will clear Font Book's database and the cache files of the user account you logged into in Safe Mode.
    Next, close all running applications. From an administrator account, open the Terminal app and enter the following command. You can also copy/paste it from here into the Terminal window:
    sudo atsutil databases -remove
    Terminal will then ask for your admin password. As you type, it will not show anything, so be sure to enter it correctly.
    This removes all font cache files. Both for the system and the current user font cache files. After running the command, close Terminal and immediately restart your Mac.

  • Psd file wash out when add transparency to page

    HI,
    I've had a noticeable yet unknown problem, and today I figured out why, but now need help fixing it.
    Working with CS2
    When I import a grayscale psd file into ID, it gets washed out when I add a transparent element to the page. My page started out in the page Window as a solid white background, and changed to transparent when I added the transparent element next to it. At the same time, my nicely contrasted grayscale psd image (contains levels adjustment layer) became washed out and lighter. This is the first time I've actually watched it happen as I added a transparent element - probably because often transparent elements are added before my photos.(this explains the poor image quality I've had in the past - always thought it was a calibration issue on my monitor).
    So my question is, how do I get the page (icon in the pages window) to be solid white again? or at least not weaken my grayscale images?
    I had a printout before I added the transparent box, the image printed nicely. Now the image prints washed out just as on the screen. (printing using "Send All Data" for image output.
    I'm working in Doc CMYK, transparency flattener is set to Doc CMYK, turned on overprint preview, tried isolating the blending, knocking it out, re-placing the psd file, adding a solid white box behind it (a no-no, I know, but was for testing purposes) all to no avail.
    I'm sure there must be a setting somewhere, but I'm not finding it.
    I'm grateful for any help I can get!

    How are you printing? Are there any CMYK elements on the page?
    Most desktop printers are really RGB devices. You may find you get better results if you change the transparency blend space to RGB.
    Peter

  • Why does my Pages Brochure print all washed out?

    When I print my Pages Photo Brochure the colors are all washed out. I edit my photos in Adobe Photoshop Elements 10 and they print out with good color and resolution from PE10. Is there a color manager for Pages? I'm exporting my document as a PDF but even if I just drop a photo on a Pages blank page and print, its still washed out. The screen view looks great but print quality is bad. Adobe says its not their problem. I'm most appreciative of any help from the forum. I'm a new MAC user. Thanks in advance :-)Judy

    Not sure I understand the question, "what is your screen"?
    I have always "saved for the web" since I'm a Real Estate Photographer and MLS Web Viewing is important. I save at 300dpi. It worked ok for print when I was using MS Publisher to create my documents. My print colors were vibrant with good resolution.
    When I print aphoto dierectly from PE10, it looks great, but the same Photo printed from Pages is faded and washed out.
    In PE10 I have my color profile set to Adobe RGB. In one forum I read that Elements should be set to determine color instead of the Printer. It seems as though the PE10 color profile isn't available to Pages.
    Perhaps PE10 doesn't save the color profile in the photograph?
    How should the Photoshop Elements Profile be set up to work best with Pages so that my photos will be optimized when I print from Pages?
    I continue to use PE10 because I shoot with a wide angle lens and need to be able to correct vertical distortions.
    thanks for your help! Judy

  • I have developed one website and provied print fuctionality to print entire web from , but it is not printing the web page correctly, even in print preview it is showing wrong out put

    i have developed one website and provied print fuctionality to print entire web from , but it is not printing the web page correctly, even in print preview it is showing wrong out put...

    Try posting at the Web Development / Standards Evangelism forum at MozillaZine. The helpers over there are more knowledgeable about web page development issues with Firefox. <br />
    http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=25 <br />
    You'll need to register and login to be able to post in that forum.
    Make sure you provide the URL for the problematic page, so they can see the problem for themselves.

  • Costco and soft proofing show dull washed out image

    OK, so I am trying to utilize my nearest costco to print some images from lightroom 5. I am getting back dull washed out prints.
    Facts:
    I shoot in RAW in manual mode
    I am using sRGB when I do my post processing
    I export to jpg for printing
    I used the costco LR5 plugin from Alloyphoto to upload to Costco
    I have installed the printer profiles from drycreek for the specific location/printer and have chosen the correct profile as I export
    I made sure that I chose to have Costco NOT autocorrect the color
    Even when I use LR5's soft proofing, I get the same result on my monitor
    I checked the print I got back and it says that they did NOT autocorrect (taken with a grain of salt)
    The machine they are using is a Noritsu QSS-A, so I know my profile is correct
    I have attached a screen shot of what I am seeing.
    Why am I seeing this on my soft proofing as well as my prints?
    How can I solve this and get vibrant prints?
    Any advice would be helpful.
    Message was edited by: moviebuffking

    moviebuffking wrote:
    I have calibrated my monitor as good as I can get without specific hardware. I have 18 years experience calibrating monitors (via optical media and my eyes), so I know that mine is very close.
    It is virtually impossible to "accurately" set the Luminance, Gamma, and Color temperature "by eye." This is most likely the cause of your prints not matching the screen image you see in LR. That being the monitor's Luminance (i.e. Brightness) level is too set to high.
    http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/colour_management/prints_too_dark.html
    To see if this could be your problem I downloaded the posted screen shot and cropped out the 'Copy' image, which has your adjustments applied to it. Here are my results:
    Click on image to see full-size
    I needed to apply a full F stop (+1.0 EV) of Exposure correction to achieve a good midtone brightness level for the print image. You'll notice I also added -50 Highlights and +50 Shadows along with +25 Vibrance. I bet the image with my adjustments added looks way too bright on your uncalibrated monitor.
    You have two (2)  issues–Monitor Calibration and LR Basic Panel Control Adjustments
    Monitior Calibration
    I would highly recommend investing in a hardware monitor calibrator such as the X-Rite i1 Display and ColorMunki, or Datacolor Spyder models. If you tell me what make and model monitor you are using I can recommend specific calibrators.
    Temporarily you can try adjusting the monitor "by eye" to get it closer to the desired 120cd/m2 Luminance, 2.2 Gamma, and 6500K Color Temperature using the test patterns at this site:
    http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/
    When the monitors Brightness and Contrast controls have been correctly set the screen image should look much closer to the prints you have recently made with the LR Soft Proof adjustments. So in fact you will be adjusting the monitor to make it look bad with the LR adjustments you applied. The proper monitor settings will make the Lagom test patterns look correct AND should make your bad Costco prints now match the screen image using you original LR settings.
    After changing the monitor's Brightness and Contrast settings try readjusting a few of the  image files you had printed and send them to Costco as check prints. Compare them again to your monitor's screen image. They should be much better!
    LR Basic Panel Tone Control Adjustment
    LR's PV2012 Tone controls can provide much improvement to your raw image Highlight and Shadow detail. Start with all of the Tone controls at their '0' default settings and adjust them from the top-down in the order shown below.
    1. Set Exposure for the midtone brightness ignoring the highlight and shadow areas for now. Setting Exposure about +.5 EV higher than what looks correct for the midtones seems to work best with most images.
    2. Leave Contrast at 0 for now. You’ll adjust this after the first pass.
    3. Adjust Highlights so that blown out areas are recovered and “fine tonal detail” is revealed.
    4. Adjust Shadows to reveal fine detail in dark areas. For most normal images simply setting -Shadows = +Highlights (Example -50 and +50) works very well.
    5. The Whites control sets the white clipping point, which you can see by holding down the ALT key as you move the slider. Adjust it to the point where you see clipping just appear with the ALT key.
    6. The Blacks control sets the black clipping point, which you can see by holding down the ALT key as you move the slider. Adjust it to the point where you see clipping just appear with the ALT key.
    7. Now go back and adjust the Contrast control to establish the best midtone contrast.
    8. Lastly touchup the Exposure control for the best midtone brightness.
    9. If necessary “touch-up” the controls using the same top-down workflow.
    moviebuffking wrote:
    Am I correct in assuming that the soft proof (with a certain profile) is a "preview" of what that print will look like?
    Soft Proof does two things. It shows you what the image's colors will look like in the target color space (i.e. printer profile). You can see what (if any) colors are "out of gamut" by clicking on the small icon in the upper-righthand corner of the Histogram. You can also see if any of the colors fall out of your monitor's gamut by clicking on the small icon in the upper-lefthand corner of the Histogram.
    When you check 'Simulate Paper & Ink' the Soft Proof image's contrast and color saturation are changed to make it look closer to what the "reflective" print image will look like when held next to the monitor for comparison. Many people have difficulty using 'Simulate Paper & Ink' since it requires using precise light levels for viewing the print and a well calibrated monitor.
    In summary my best suggestion is to purchase and use a good hardware monitor calibrator on a scheduled basis to insure you have an "accurate" screen image inside LR and other color managed applications like PS.

  • Images imported from Aperture showing up 'washed out' in Lightroom.

    I am aware that Lightroom uses ProPhoto RBG. When i export images from Aperture to a folder then import into Lightroom the images appear very different. Is there a setting i am missing as the images seem 'washed' out in Lightroom. When i export to the desktop and open in Photoshop they look the same as in Aperture. After i import to Lightroom and open in Photoshop they still look washed out.
    New to Lightroom and trying to find the right alternative to Aperture.
    Many Thanks in advance.

    You are probably right, it is an issue with color profiles and gamut.  Aperture does use a different raw converter, which will create some variance.  In fact, many like the look of straight Aperture raw conversions over straight ACR conversions.  But if the washed out look is dramatic, and Photoshop opens your raw files okay, then it must be a profile issue.
    It may help to explain how you are exporting from Aperture.  Are your source files raw files, PSDs, TIFFs, or JPEGs?   Are you exporting masters, or are you exporting versions?  If you're exporting versions, take a look at your "source preset" when exporting.  What color profile are you embedding?
    Although if you are embedding any color profile, Photoshop and Lightroom should pick it up.
    All I've read is that Lightroom manages profiles more transparently than Photoshop, but perhaps someone could jump in here and say how it is managed.
    Finally, what purpose are you exporting and importing into Lightroom?  If you're migrating your library to a Lightroom catalog, you may be best served by using the Aperture migration plug-in.
    Aperture import plugin now available
    The plug-in still has issues with foreign characters, importing all previews, and face keywording and keywording previews.  You'll be better off waiting until these issues are fixed.  Even if you can't, the plug-in would still be a better option than a manual attempt, unless you're doing something other than migrating your Aperture library.

  • Firefox chrome in washed-out colors, hard to read

    Hi,
    To see anything but bright washed-out colors and text, I had to change to a dark theme! (NASA Night Launch) But this is as good as it gets, bleached pink (should be black), text still hard to read.
    - Web page ok, it's just the chrome (tabstip, address bar and other toolbars) that is messed up.
    - Only present on one of my computers (with FF32.0.1).
    - On this computer (laptop), the problem is present on two recently added external displays. (not the built-in, not previously added displays)
    - Only Firefox affected, no other programs running on my Win8.1update is affected. (other browsers show regular colors/text in tabstrips, toolbars, menus etc.
    - Problem gone while in Firefox Safe Mode.
    - Problem remains even if I disable every single add-on, and set "ask to activate" on every plugin.
    Any ideas?
    Hope to be able to stick to Firefox in the future :)

    Can you attach a screenshot?
    *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screenshot
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/how-do-i-create-screenshot-my-problem
    *Use a compressed image type like PNG or JPG to save the screenshot
    *Make sure that you do not exceed the maximum size of 1 MB
    Were you using or did you ever use a lightweight theme (Persona)?
    Try to disable hardware acceleration in Firefox.
    *Tools > Options > Advanced > General > Browsing: "Use hardware acceleration when available"
    You need to close and restart Firefox after toggling this setting.
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/upgrade-graphics-drivers-use-hardware-acceleration

  • Photos are more washed out in FireFox than Safari

    Hi. I've created photo pages in iweb, and when i view the pages in Firefox, the images look much less saturated/more washed out, than when i view them in safari. Any idea why this might be?
    the site is www.coutroulis.com then go to 'shots'
    thx

    Not all browsers support Color Management like Safari does. With FireFox, it can work, but is turned off in the default installation. Sites that look very nice on a Mac monitor with Safari can look very washed out on a PC with IE or FireFox (Safari for Windows does better).
    Here is a page that explains the concept pretty well (these issues were not a problem for me in the past as I used GoLive and now Dreamweaver, with graphics prepared by Photoshop):
    http://www.gballard.net/psd/golive_pageprofile/embeddedJPEGprofiles.html#
    I've found that having both browsers open to the same page makes it easier to see the examples properly.
    Note the colors in the chart about half way down the page. The chart is built with graphics that have color management information that tells the browser how to deal with it. Safari shows the named colors perfectly (the box with RED text is actually Red in color), Firefox does not (the box with Red text is actually Blue in color). This is an extreme way to show that some browsers are using Color Management info from the pictures on the page. Your photos have information that Safari is using, but not FireFox.
    The page has instructions on how to turn on Color Management in FireFox but you can't turn it on for everyone who comes to your site.
    The page is in depth, with opinions on how to avoid the problems at all by using the sRGB Color Space which is the default option when using Photoshop or Photoshop Elements and "Save For Web". "Save For Web" is also just about the easiest way to get great looking photo's at the smallest file size, for web page photo's.
    So you get three things from the Photoshop programs - Graphics load faster because they are smaller than the less powerful iWeb optimization, they often look better than other programs that just let you save as a jpg with a variable % quality level, and the sRGB Color Space used in the photo's works well in all browsers and platforms.
    Web Site Design has always been about compromise - quality, speed, and accuracy. If your site is only for you and some other Mac/Windows friends who are using Safari - No Problem, otherwise you might want to adapt as needed for better pages for a larger audience.

  • HP Officejet Pro 8100 - Washed out blacks in images / Dark blacks in text prints???

    Here is my system: iMac Maverics OS, HP Officejet Pro 8100, Photoshop, Pages & Genuine inks.
    I print a text page (Black and various colours) from Pages/Text Edit or any other text program and the colours are deeply saturated, blacks are black and I'm totally happy.
    I print the exact same text, recreated in Photoshop, everything is washed out. Blacks are greyish, colours are pastel & it looks like it's been printed at 50% opacity.
    I saved my Photoshop text mock up as a .Jpg .TIF .BMP and tried printing them in Pages & Mac Preview - same washed out results as when I print direct from inside Photoshop.
    All my software is genuine, drivers are up to date. It's like HP use one process to print text and a whole other process to print images, **bleep** is going on???
    Please advise on how to fix, if anyone else is having or has had similar issues.....

    Hello @pA8100 , and welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience!
    I see you're experiencing Photoshop colour issues.  I would like to help.
    It is possible you need to adjust the colour settings in Photoshop from RGB to CKMY.
    I would recommend utilizing this article on How to Convert RGB to CMYK in Photoshop.
    Good luck and please let me know the results of your troubleshooting steps. Thank you for posting on the HP Forums!
    Please click “Accept as Solution " if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks" for helping!
    Jamieson
    I work on behalf of HP
    "Remember, I'm pulling for you, we're all in this together!" - Red Green.

  • Safari 4 Color and Gamma STILL Washes Out -- NOT Solved 7/4/2009

    OK, just bringing this back to the top:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2032159&start=0&tstart=0 is listed as 'Solved', but that was totally premature. The alleged fixes range from the usual repair permissions, trash Safari prefs, reboot, etc., but it's all temporary, at best.
    A CLEAN install of the OS to a virgin partition, followed by permissions, repair, combo updater, apply all related Safari, repair permissions, delete, shutdown and reboot leaves you with the same issue as soon as you sleep displays, go to screen saver, use FUS, and come back in with Safari 4 already running, you will get the screen wash as further described here:
    http://gallery.me.com/frederico/100070
    Posted Elsewhere:
    Gamma settings within Safari 4 windows since upgrade will "degrade" (read: darken and stratify) when scrolling the window contents, using either scroll wheel, arrow keys, or mouse on scroll bar. Text also becomes progressively fuzzy and its opacity decreases until the entire window is black.
    Moving another application window in front, or minimizing and maximizing the errant window, moving or resizing it in any manner, or using the 'Force Repaint' command will restore the appearance immediately. I can capture screenshots of it, but cannot use your included screenshot command, as the mere act of dropping down the report slider forces repaint.
    Quitting Safari, rebooting machine, or just logging out will "cure" the problem for a short time, but it returns fairly quickly. I do not believe I have any third party plugins causing the issue; I removed several and the problem still crept back; each user account, including a freshly created test account sees this error.
    This can fairly regularly be triggered by sleeping the displays or entering locked screensaver, logging in, and going to several sites such as Daring Fireball, Mac OS X Hints, and anything displaying PNG and Flash combos.
    Perhaps related: I updated to 10.5.7 at the same time, and when I restarted, noticed that the gamma profile on my center screen (of five LCDs) was severely washed out. Switching back and forth between any other color profile in Displays and back to my calibrated profile will cure the wash -- until I log out and back in. Each user account, including a freshly created test account sees this error.
    Have also clean installed OS X 10.5.4 and updated to a10.5.7 using combo updater; then installed and updated Safari 4. Problem follows Main screen (menubar host) on each of five LCD displays on three ATi video cards on Mac Pro Quad 2008.
    Getting ready to restore back to Safari 3 and 10.5.6 from clone; this behavior is becoming tedious.
    Screenshots and additional details on request; <Edited by Host>
    http://gallery.me.com/frederico/100070
    More info and more users seeing the same thing here
    http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=2009062403534417
    http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=2009062403534417#comments
    Hardware Overview:
    Model Name: Mac Pro
    Model Identifier: MacPro3,1
    Processor Name: Quad-Core Intel Xeon
    Processor Speed: 2.8 GHz
    Number Of Processors: 2
    Total Number Of Cores: 8
    L2 Cache (per processor): 12 MB
    Memory: 6 GB
    Bus Speed: 1.6 GHz
    Boot ROM Version: MP31.006C.B05
    System Version: Mac OS X 10.5.7 (9J61)
    Kernel Version: Darwin 9.7.0
    Boot Volume: system
    Boot Mode: Normal
    ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT:
    Chipset Model: ATI Radeon HD 2600
    Type: Display
    Bus: PCIe
    Slot: Slot-1
    PCIe Lane Width: x16
    VRAM (Total): 256 MB
    Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
    Device ID: 0x9588
    Revision ID: 0x0000
    ROM Revision: 113-B1480A-252
    EFI Driver Version: 01.00.252
    Displays:
    CMC 22 W:
    Resolution: 1680 x 1050 @ 60 Hz
    Depth: 32-Bit Color
    Core Image: Hardware Accelerated
    Mirror: Off
    Online: Yes
    Quartz Extreme: Supported
    Rotation: Supported
    CMC 22 W:
    Resolution: 1680 x 1050 @ 60 Hz
    Depth: 32-Bit Color
    Core Image: Hardware Accelerated
    Main Display: Yes
    Mirror: Off
    Online: Yes
    Quartz Extreme: Supported
    Rotation: Supported
    ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT:
    Chipset Model: ATI Radeon HD 2600
    Type: Display
    Bus: PCIe
    Slot: Slot-2
    PCIe Lane Width: x16
    VRAM (Total): 256 MB
    Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
    Device ID: 0x9588
    Revision ID: 0x0000
    ROM Revision: 113-B1480A-252
    EFI Driver Version: 01.00.252
    Displays:
    CMC 22 W:
    Resolution: 1680 x 1050 @ 60 Hz
    Depth: 32-Bit Color
    Core Image: Hardware Accelerated
    Mirror: Off
    Online: Yes
    Quartz Extreme: Supported
    Rotation: Supported
    CMC 22 W:
    Resolution: 1680 x 1050 @ 60 Hz
    Depth: 32-Bit Color
    Core Image: Hardware Accelerated
    Main Display: Yes
    Mirror: Off
    Online: Yes
    Quartz Extreme: Supported
    Rotation: Supported
    ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT:
    Chipset Model: ATI Radeon HD 2600
    Type: Display
    Bus: PCIe
    Slot: Slot-3
    PCIe Lane Width: x16
    VRAM (Total): 256 MB
    Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
    Device ID: 0x9588
    Revision ID: 0x0000
    ROM Revision: 113-B1480A-252
    EFI Driver Version: 01.00.252
    Displays:
    CMC 19AW:
    Resolution: 1440 x 900 @ 60 Hz
    Depth: 32-Bit Color
    Core Image: Hardware Accelerated
    Mirror: Off
    Online: Yes
    Quartz Extreme: Supported
    Rotation: Supported
    Display Connector:
    Status: No Display Connected

    Now THAT is interesting. I typically do not have two Safari windows open and active on the same screen; I usually have three or more Safari windows open, but each is on its own screen, using tabs within each.
    I think it's fascinating to see that the content is only affected in one window on the same page.
    Can you elaborate as to your trigger? Is it FUS? Screensaver? Other?
    The suggestion in either this thread or the other to switch the window momentarily to another screen to clear the problem until the next FUS or screensaver event is my current favorite fix. I have hotkeys assigned to move a window from one screen to another, anyway, so when I return to a user session from login to see Safari schizing out, a quick screen-swap toggle clears the issues until I allow a screensaver (but not always) or engage FUS (always) and see the issue return.
    Do you have multiple screens? Can you reliably resolve the issue by swapping and returning, rather than being forced to quit Safari?
    One thing to note about the screen swap, is that when this issue is occurring, there is a tremendous lag (a solid second or so) before the window is actually moved to the other screen, and a comparable lag when returning. IOW, there is an observable and HUGE processor spike as well as a memory-use spike (seen in Activity Monitor, top, and iStat Menus) as it deals with moving the visual display (be it plain text or graphic or video content) when this bug is active, but the same action two seconds later, or the same action in any other program, nets near-instant screen movement in response to the global hotkey action.
    So, whatever it is that is borked between Safari and Core Video is not just an interpretation/ColorSync/disply error; it seems also to be leaking memory and having runaway processor cycles, as well.
    There are times when Safari, with less than ten or twenty tabs open starts eating pretty close to 2GB of RAM, and will dominate a single processor to near 100%, *without* any windows actually containing very much in the way of images, and certainly no Flash or even QT.
    I know this sounds a bit arrogant and spoiled, but thank God I have 8 cores and 8GB of RAM; I cannot imagine how this bug might feel on a single core machine with less than 2GB of RAM.

  • Lightroom's interpretation of camera raw data washes out colours

    After I import images from my Canon 5D, they look different when I go into the develop module. I read the FAQ and I understand that this is caused by the difference between the stored thumbnail on the camera and the way lightroom interprets the raw image data.
    The problem is, the tone and colour are always far superior in the camera thumbnail interpretation, and I spend considerable time on Lightroom to try and get the image back to how it originally looked on the camera thumbnail, usually unsucsessfully.
    Is there a way I can get lightroom to match exactly the look of the previews stored with the raw file on the camera?
    It is a big problem, because after lightroom interprets the data, skin tones look washed out and the colours are not as rich or natural looking.
    I don't have this problem on other raw converters, and it is making me look for another software solution if I can't resolve the problem.
    Help!

    Well, my eyes must be doing some wonky things then... because in my experience its LR that is cheating me on the colors.
    Yes... Canon many times oversaturates the colors... but I'm pretty sure that those red cherries I took a picture of were not pumpkin orange as LR shows them. ACR has some serious hue shift problems, yet not for everyone... it varies from camera model to camera model, and even within camera model from camera to camera.
    The best we can do, since ACR isn't intelligent enough, is to fiddle with the calibration settings, and save that as the new default for the camera. (There are scripts that help do this if you have a Color-checker and CS2/CS3... but are of no help if you use only LR or Elements.)
    Never expect the default settings in RAW (for ANY converter... Canon's included (with execption, perhaps of Zoombrowser)) to match the preview you see on the camera, or the out-of-camera jpeg. Adjustments will need to be made. Unfortunately in ACR, this means hours of messing the calibration sliders, much trial and error, and perhaps multiple presets to help with different lighting conditions.
    That said... I too would like to see ACR improve in this area... but for the mean-time this is the best we can do.
    edit: (I'm (slightly) exagerrating the extent of the shift above... but its VERY noticable... and can be very frustrating.
    This site: http://www.photoactivity.com/Pagine/Articoli/023%20Calibratori%20al%20sole/Calibratori%20 al%20sole_en.asp explains in more detail than I understand some of the calibration scripts... and even has some screenshots of a color-checker comparing ACR defaults and various scripts to the color-checker. I'd guess the shifts I see are comparable to some of those shifts seen on that page.)

  • 4K TV not recognized correctly: MacBook Pro Mid2014 15" reports a Samsung UE40HU6900 4K TV as 8K (7680x4320). This results in an ugly, washed out image half the size it should be. Is there a fix for this? (OSX 10.10.1)

    MacBook Pro Mid2014 15" reports a Samsung UE40HU6900 4K TV as 8K (7680x4320).
    This results in an ugly, washed out image half the size it should be. If you turn off scaling everything is tiny as 8K are displayed on a 4K screen. To get the actual 4K resolution you have to turn on scaling. Still 8K is transferred to the device, but doubling the data lines makes the picture look washed out and create obscure effects for line borders.
    Did anybody encounter this problem before? Is there a fix for this? (OSX 10.10.1)

    You have the MacBookPro6,2, the Edsel of Macs. It may be covered by this program:
    MacBook Pro (15-inch, Mid 2010): Intermittent black screen or loss of video
    Make a "Genius" appointment at an Apple Store to have the machine tested.
    Print the first page of the panic report and bring it with you.
    Back up all data on the internal drive(s) before you hand over your computer to anyone. If privacy is a concern, erase the data partition(s) with the option to write zeros* (do this only if you have at least two complete, independent backups, and you know how to restore to an empty drive from any of them.) Don’t erase the recovery partition, if present.
    *An SSD doesn't need to be zeroed.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Payment Advice errors ( window Main )

    Hi Gurus I am generating the payment advice for 2 different vendors based on their 2 different languages. CZ - language & EN ( Using the Texts in Recipients Langauge option) I am getting the following error during the payment program run with payment

  • Map client certificate to user in PI7.1

    I am setting up HTTPS for inbound (sending messages to the adater engine), on the server-side configuration, I need to map a client certificate to an user. help.sap.com has this instruction: Perform the following steps to allow AS Java to map the cli

  • Indesign CC 2014 color separation to Acrobat DC 2014

    I have Adobe Acrobat DC 2014, and i am unable to perform a color separation from Indesign CC 2014 to Acrobate DC 2014. Is there a way to fix this? I was able to do it for Acrobat X Pro.

  • Suggestion required in implementing Advanced Queues

    I am using Oracle 11g Database in Linux Platform . The scenario is like this ... I am selecting rows from a table(say "A") doing some operations using PLSQL API's and finally dumping the results into other table(say "B") . Now the results populated a

  • 8130 pearl - ringtones and desktop keep reverting back to preloaded version

    If there is a thread that addresses this please direct I am a new owner. I have transferred pics to data card and selected for desktop, however every few days the phone reverts the desktop back to one of the preloaded versions. The same is happening