Painfully slow network connection

I am trying to evaluate the prospect of installing OS X Server 10.5 on a G5 tower at my workplace, and one of the primary issues is the speed of the office network. Perhaps due to the fact that we are physically located in two different buildings, we not infrequently have problems with some computers connecting to the server (currently running OS X 10.4 [Client]). When connecting via AFP, for example, some computers time out trying to connect or grind to a halt trying to open or save a Word document or something. The server also tries to back up all of our machines using Retrospect, and while some computers transfer files at around 100Kbps, some are around 2K or, again, just time out.
I'm trying to get the network folks to look into these issues, but my basic question is this: if I want to have people able to log in and use their home directory on any computer, can I set things up such that if a given computer has a terribly slow connection to the internet, they can at least login to some local account instead? Ideally, if on their own computer, the fallback would be a cached copy of their own home directory, a la Portable Home Directories. I'd probably be happy with just a vanilla account, though.
In the same vein, if someone logs in using their network home directory, but the network connection goes to ****, will they be unable to do anything? Will they at least be able to log out and switch to a local account? I suppose that this would only work if each computer archived a copy of the user account of any user that logged in using it.
Thanks for any advice you have on implementing this sort of scheme,
Greg

{quote}With the AirPort Extreme, in the AirPort panel, Wireless tab, click on the button for "Wireless Network Options", check the box for "5 GHz Network Name", and enter a different network name. (That can be trivially different, such as the name of the main network suffixed with an underscore and the digit 5.) Once configured that way, connect your "N" gear to each network in turn to see if one is any better than the other. (If you're wondering what effect this would have, it allows segregating your "N" gear from the older gear to prevent the older gear from slowing down your network. However, distance and interference from things like walls may negate any advantage.){quote}
William: I was gone most of yesterday, but had a chance to implement your recommendations today. I added the 5 GHz network as you suggested, but in order to connect to that at all with my 802.n11 MacBokk Pro, I need to be within a few feet of the AE (base station). If I try to access that network even from the next room (well within reach of both the AE and the livingroom AX, I get one bar and "failure to connect" messages just trying to logon to that network.
However, I did some experimenting that (as of right now, anyway) resulted in much faster network access, not only from my MacBook, but also from the older iMac which is the furthest Mac from the AE. According to my wife, that iMac is "loading web pages faster than I've ever seen them!"
Here's what I did:
1. Moved all three units to places where it seemed they would have the least amount of interference with the clearest path from unit to unit, also raising the height of both AXs from about 2-3 feet from the floor to about 5-6 feet from the floor.
2. Changed one setting on the AE (base station): Wireless Tab > Wireless Network Options > Multicast Rate ---> Changed this from Low to High.
I have a feeling the location shifts made the real difference, but I will try changing the multicast rate back to "Low" just to see what happens.
Paul

Similar Messages

  • Slow network connection possibly causing a slave to crash.

    We are using Berkeley DB XML 2.4.16 (Patch level 1) in combination with Berkeley DB 4.7.25 (Patch level 3). These are Java processes.
    We have a 4 node replication group with a master and a slave in the US, a slave in the UK and a slave in HK. We are using the built in replication manager. The acknowledgement policy is set to none. The HK slave OS is Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 8).
    The slave in HK is on a fairly slow network connection to the master in the US.
    The amount of traffic generated by the master can become fairly busy at times and this seemingly causes the HK slave to become fairly unstable. It would routinely crash (SIGSEGV) with the following back trace caught with gdb and a debug build of Berkeley DB XML/Berkeley DB. The location of the crash is very consistent. The UK slave also suffers this problem, but to a lesser degree (I suspect the faster network link to the UK to be a factor here).
    #5 <signal handler called>
    #6 0xb74fb2f8 in intfree () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
    #7 0xb74fa278 in free () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
    #8 0x6b7eee53 in __os_free (env=0x0, ptr=0x6ba335c0) at ../os/os_alloc.c:405
    #9 0x6b751375 in message_loop (env=0x6ba1acc0) at ../repmgr/repmgr_msg.c:49
    #10 0x6b7512a4 in __repmgr_msg_thread (args=0x6ba1acc0) at ../repmgr/repmgr_msg.c:29
    #11 0xb75c9dd8 in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
    #12 0xb7565d1a in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
    We had been adjusting the rep_set_limit environment parameter to see if it would help. First to 5MB, then to 1MB with little or no improvement.
    In an attempt to gather more information I had activated verbose replication logging on the HK slave which has had the side effect of fixing the problem.
    Does this sound like something that could be addressed with the rep_set_request parameter?
    I am no master on tuning these replication settings so some guidance would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Neil

    OK,
    I was able to reproduce the crash once again with verbose replication logging at the master, I know the verbose logging at the slave would be better but as we discussed that in fact fixes the problem, probably due the additional logging is throttling the replication mechanics a little.
    Here is the back-trace…
    #5 <signal handler called>
    #6 0xb74fb2f8 in intfree () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
    #7 0xb74fa278 in free () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
    #8 0x6b7d3e53 in __os_free (env=0x0, ptr=0x6b9de2b0) at ../os/os_alloc.c:405
    #9 0x6b736375 in message_loop (env=0x6b941da0) at ../repmgr/repmgr_msg.c:49
    #10 0x6b7362a4 in __repmgr_msg_thread (args=0x6b941da0) at ../repmgr/repmgr_msg.c:29
    #11 0xb75c9dd8 in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
    #12 0xb7565d1a in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
    Here is control info…
    print msg->control
    $1 = {data = 0x6b9de2f0, size = 36, ulen = 0, dlen = 0, doff = 0, app_data = 0x0, flags = 0}
    x/36xb msg->control.data
    0x6b9de2f0: 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x05 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x0e
    0x6b9de2f8: 0x00 0x00 0x00 0xf6 0x00 0x37 0x1a 0xd7
    0x6b9de300: 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x0b 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x01
    0x6b9de308: 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
    0x6b9de310: 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x64
    The HK site was a bit behind when I started the tests, I didn't have the slave instance up over the weekend, I don't now if this really effects the results as I believe the HK has a hard time keeping up when there is a large volume of replication traffic in the normal case, hence the resulting crash is the same…
    Before the crash, the slave was synchronizing with the master and it was sending out what I would guess normal "nobuf" messages. This is quickly followed by a large amount of "nobuf resend" messages. This continues for a bit intermixed with " MASTER: wrote only 53 bytes to site XXX.XX.XX.XX:58010" (The number of bytes are random). In the end it starts logging the following several times along with the "nobuf resend" messages..
    MASTER: msg to site XXX.XX.XX.XX:58010 to be queued
    MASTER: block msg thread, await queue space
    MASTER: will await drain
    MASTER: drain returned 0 (0,0)
    If you would like to take a look at the actual log, I will need a way to filter any sensitive information (which could prove to be difficult) or attempt to reproduce it with another pair rigged to be something generic and hope it exhibits the same behavior.

  • Painfully slow wireless connection with Time Capsule

    I have recently bought and changed over my home wireless to a Time Capsule 2TB, which I wanted for both the backup and the ease in home networking. I have set up the wireless network and since day one it has been painfully slow! I have created two wireless networks, one for 2.4GHz and the other for 5GHz. I have been reading all over the web and boards but to no avail.  Any suggestions? I am about to give up on the time capsule completely! I couldn't even download my podcast tonight.
    Help!

    Firstly plug in directly by ethernet to be sure there isn't a network issue on wan side.
    Are you testing on multiple computers .. Mac and/or PC?? Which ones. and what network cards are being used?
    Try and remove anything that uses G wireless and throw away any B wireless. It will not work together with N even if it is an option.
    Turn off the guest network if you have it on.
    Have you used a wireless analyser like kismac or inssider for pc? Find the free channels and set the wireless to that. Use no security at first to test.. briefly.. and then select wpa2 personal. Is there any difference?
    Do you have another wireless router running?? Were you using a different wireless router for comparison?

  • Macbook pro  update 10.9.5 slow network connection smb

    After the update my cable network connection got very slow. It's a smb connection to a qnap nas. Same problem on all the computers updated. Sistem not updated are working fine.

    Hi shotsstudio, 
    Welcome to the Apple Support Communities!
    For troubleshooting your Wi-Fi network with your Apple computer, I would first recommend reading over the attached article for troubleshooting steps. The steps that may be most appropriate for your situation are located in the Symptom: The Wi-Fi network seems slow section. 
    Wi-Fi: How to troubleshoot Wi-Fi connectivity
    Have a great day, 
    Joe

  • Painfully slow broadband connection

    Hello, my boradband connection has been painfully slow these past couple days I have a download speed of 3.16 Mbps and an upload speed of 0.66 Mbps. I feel it should be higher. Sky Hub Stats  Router StatisticsSystem Up Time: 20:49:27PortStatusTxPktsRxPktsCollision PktsTx b/sRx b/sUp TimeWANPPPoA55465471722700011:17:32LANUp340065845900020:49:27WLANUp2759170195605701120:49:27Broadband LinkDownstreamUpstreamConnection Speed3821 kbps799 kbpsLine Attenuation52.5 dB33.4 dBNoise Margin6.3 dB12.12 dB 

    Mine is exactly the same, contacted sky about it via email. The technical dept ran a line tst and was showing good speeds at off peak times. 6-7mbps  5pm to midnight typically when I want to use is is as low at 0.44mbps I cant work with that. so it's getting pulled out as sky cant rectify it

  • Outlook 2010 performance much slower than 2007 and 2003 when used with POP3 mail provider over slow network connection

    When received messages include embedded pictures, Outlook 2010 does not persist those pictures in the .pst file with the message text.  Instead, it redownloads the pictures every time the message is rendered for viewing or printing.
    Send/Receive to replicate a message with multiple embedded pictures from POP3 mail server (not Exchange server)
    Select and view the message - notice all the x placeholders for the embedded pictures
    Right-click any x placeholder and select to "download pictures"
    After some delay, the pictures are rendered, replacing the placeholders, to form the complete message
    Now, select "File" and "Print" -- notice that the preview is not immediately displayed.  There is a delay while thos same embedded pictures are downloaded, again.  Sometimes there will be a pop-up notification that Outlook is "communicating with
    the server"
    Eventually the message is fully rendered with all embedded pictures
    Now, select a different printer -- notice that the preview disappears and it takes time to .... yes, redownload those same pictures, again.
    Finally, click on "Print" -- notice yet another delay for a final download to rerender the message for the printer.
    Having done all that, close Outlook, disconnect from the network (turn off wireless or disconnect wire), open Outlook and view that same message.  The x placeholders are shown instead of the embedded pictures.  Although those embedded pictures
    were downloaded multiple times already, they were not persisted locally.
    Outlook 2003 and 2007 correct ask for confirmation to save the pictures locally then does so.  Printing and viewing is then possible without having to redownload those pictures.
    Is there going to be a fix for this Outlook 2010 defect?   I've been waiting, applying updates, and waiting.....

    Please do not close this thread.  The issue remains.  I apologize for not checking back sooner.  I thought I would get pinged by email when this tread was updated;  I did not.  I'll monitor more closely in the future.
    First, please note that I explicitly set Outlook to NOT download pictures automatically.  I want to be prompted to download.  However, after confirmed that I want the download, I expect pictures related to the message to be downloaded only once,
    immediately after I confirm that I want them downloaded. 
    I have confirmed many times that the behavior in this area is NOT identical between 2003, 2007 and 2010.  In particular, 2007 does download once and store locally (if user confirms to save changes when prompted), as expected, and 2010 downloads each
    view/preview/print.
    This is quite easy to verify -- simply unplug any network cable, disable wireless, etc.  In other words completely detach from the networked world.  2007 will correctly view/preview/etc. from local storage whereas 2010 always reverts to showing
    placeholders for any embedded images.  This is 100% repeatable.
    As an additional verification, simply move the .pst file to another system that is not connected to any network.  Open the .pst file with 2007 and any embedded images that were already downloaded (and saved) are there, with 2010 they are not.
    With 2010, it is bad enough that embedded images are not saved for viewing when disconnected.  Worse than that, the repeated downloads can be a significant disruption to performance.  Just get on a really slow wireless connection as is typical
    in some hotels.  Then try to view and print messages with lots of embedded pictures.  Slow takes on a whole new, even slower, meaning.
    This 2010 defect has been reproduced.  Is there a KB article, Windows Update, hotfix,.... anything available to eliminate this problem of repeated downloads of embedded pictures?

  • Can a Hyper-V machine be made slower and/or emulate a slow network connection?

     need to reproduce an issue with a client-server asynchronous communication (a bunch of JavaScript AJAX vs. an OData api), seemingly caused by some race condition in the calculations when the server and/or the network connection
    slow down.
    Now, the test environment I have is a local Hyper-V machine, so it's all shiny and fast ... I need it to slow
    down to verify it.
    Is there any known method to (basically) make a LAN Hyper-V machine to behave like a remote server reached though a crawling internet connection ?

    The best method I have found for simulating a crapy internet connection is to put a pfsense router between the server and my test PC and setup the Limiter features.https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Traffic_Shaping_Guide#Limiter
    This can be used to emulate a slow network, latency or even introduce packet loss to see how your applications react to adverse network conditions.
    pfsense can run inside a hyperv virtual machine. So you can set it up then change the webserver network settings to be behind pfsense.
    If you don't like pfsense you can use any BSD distro that supports Dummynet.http://cs.baylor.edu/~donahoo/tools/dummy/tutorial.htm

  • Print times on slow network connection

    I�m looking for some ideas on how to resolve a problem that I�m having in a production environment. I'm also not sure if this is the correct forum to be in so if i would be better off elsewhere please politly let me know :)
    Background:
    I have a group of users that are working over private 56k Frame Relays. We are rolling out are new printer to these location to support new documents that are required to be printing. These laser printers are replacing a generic text impact printer. The new document include a lot more information than it�s predecessor. The old report was 10 k and the new report is now anywhere from 85 to 170k. This new report is being prepared by JasperReports
    Problem:
    Obviously this report is going to take longer to download before it sent to the printer, any where from 20 to 30 second to be exact. But it gets worse� some of these location have 2-3 workstations sharing the line so these times could spike to as high as 85 seconds for a single document. This report is being sent back to the thin client through a stream that is started by a print applet on the page.
    Other givens that I can not change:
    The line speed can not be changed. I don�t have anyway of making these documents any smaller
    Questions:
    Can anyone think of any solution to lower the print time? Obviously there is no application problem as it is not an issue in location with a high connection speed. I have done packet tracking for these locations and the network can not be optimized any more than it already is.
    Is there anyway to bring some of the responsibility to the client side so that we can send the information back in some other format to lower the network traffic� I�m grasping for straws here so any ideas are welcome,

    "We are rolling out are new printer to these location..."
    Is this mean that you have a printer in a single location and the users are sending print jobs over a slow frame relay?
    If that is the case one way to over come this problem is instead of sending the print job to the printer from client location you can implement a some kind of a server side application through which the users can directly order print jobs. And host that application in the same location that host the printer. Basically it should be possible to send the generated document to printer directly without having to send it to end user and then to printer.

  • Slow network connection - is it 10.4.8?

    My Macbook seems to have very slow Internet throughput speeds when compared to my iMac (intel). A file that takes 5-10 minutes to download on the iMac takes 30-40 minutes on the Macbook. I only noticed the difference after upgrading the Macbook to 10.4.8 and my iMac is still 10.4.7.
    Same setup in 'preferences','networking' and both connect to the Internet via the same Airport Express using WPA2.
    Any ideas as to what I should check for?

    Your welcome...glad your found the extra needed information. I should have given your more information myself. Just didnt want to overload you..
    Here is my complete problemsolver guide to slow/and or unstable wireless internet.
    If you wish to help others, you can modify it all you want, add more, and then pass it on when needed.
    I experienced slow connection to with my macbook/airport express after updating to 10.4.8.
    Im back at normal speed now. Here is what I did:
    1) Downloaded and installed the 10.4.8 combo updater instead
    http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/macosx1048comboupdateintel.html
    2) In "Network" I deleted all prefered networks one by one, set it to automatic, turned airport off and back on, and add my network again as prefered network, set it back to connect to preferred network. see apples instructions:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304482
    3) Other people suggest changed the default set up of the base channel away from "automatic" a set channel of your choice. but I didnt do that, and Im back at fast.
    4) are more computers than yours connecting to the same network and maybe dowloading? the computers on the same network, the slower connection you get
    5) Some widgts and other background software eats up too much memory. Check the activity monitor in the utilities folder, to see if some little program is eating up your ram.
    Guees I should have given you the whole thing before... sorry.
    ...cheers...peter

  • Slow network connection after uprade to kernel 2.6.19

    Hello
    Since I upgraded my kernel from 2.6.18 to 2.6.19 my connection to the net is extremely slow! Before the upgrade everything worked fine! And I haven't changed any config file.
    When I ping my internal router (ping 10.0.0.1) I get sth. like the following:
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=133 ttl=127 time=391 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=134 ttl=127 time=4394 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=135 ttl=127 time=3383 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=136 ttl=127 time=2382 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=137 ttl=127 time=1381 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=138 ttl=127 time=380 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=139 ttl=127 time=0.280 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=140 ttl=127 time=0.283 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=141 ttl=127 time=0.283 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=142 ttl=127 time=0.292 ms
    So sometimes the rt is pretty ok and the next ping is about 100x slower.
    With any other machine (gentoo, windows) I have no problems.
    I checked several threads in the forum and followed every advice, but haven't found a solution!
    http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … nel+update
    http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=27787
    I have ip6 turned off and checked my /etc/hosts file. So I thought  maybe it could be
    a problem with the nic driver. But changing the driver (from r8169 to r1000) hasn't changed anything!
    So now I really don't have a clue what the problem could be!
    Any help really, really welcome!

    It means you can downgrade your kernel if it's still in /var/cache/pacman/pkg.
    I tried several kernels form 2.6.18 to 2.6.19.1, custom and kernel26 from repo, and still www response is horrible. It's strange, but only http protocol is broken. I have no problems with ftp, mail, torrents and others. Some websites loads normal and some of them not, especially based on mediawiki engine loads very long.
    I tried many ways to solve this. I turned off iptables and almost all daemons, tested different browsers, removed browser cache and config, downgrade last upgrades, run network with dhcp and static addresses. I think it isn't dns problem, because the same reslov.conf I have on testing partition with ubuntu and it works flawlessly. My kernel doesn't have ipv6.
    I'm running out of ideas now.

  • Very slow network connection via LAN or Wifi problem

    Hello,
    I am running Windows xp MCE version on my Macbook 2.2. I have a very bothersome problem with my network speed at work.
    When I run Windows on my Mac and connect to the network of my workplace using LAN or Wireless, I can surf the local websites and Email by a very nice speed but when I try to open any page outside the companies website, it is very slow or sometime it does not even open it. In status bar it says "Waiting for www...".
    I tried almost everything. The problem does not come from my firewall(I even unistalled it). My network setting are like everybody else. I dissabled the auto Comunication speed. nothing seems to help.
    It seems to me that this is a problem with windows on Macbook.
    I was wondering has anybody a similar problem?
    Does anybody has any solution for that?
    Thanks

    Hello,
    I am running Windows xp MCE version on my Macbook 2.2. I have a very bothersome problem with my network speed at work.
    When I run Windows on my Mac and connect to the network of my workplace using LAN or Wireless, I can surf the local websites and Email by a very nice speed but when I try to open any page outside the companies website, it is very slow or sometime it does not even open it. In status bar it says "Waiting for www...".
    I tried almost everything. The problem does not come from my firewall(I even unistalled it). My network setting are like everybody else. I dissabled the auto Comunication speed. nothing seems to help.
    It seems to me that this is a problem with windows on Macbook.
    I was wondering has anybody a similar problem?
    Does anybody has any solution for that?
    Thanks

  • Very slow network connection on Mac Pro

    I have a FiOS connection and good speeds on my Macbook Pro and iPad. However, my 2010 Mac Pro connects like a dog. I just connected to my yahoo page which gives typical results. On my Macbook Pro it took 3-4 seconds. On my Mac Pro it took 58 seconds for the initial page content to arrive on my screen and 1:40 for the page to be fully loaded. This is typical. It doesn't matter if I connect through ethernet or wireless - same results. It doesn't matter which browser I use.
    I ran speedtest and the results were actually better on the Mac Pro - I have no ide why
    Mac Pro ping 16 ms  DL 30.73 mbps   UL 14.28 mbps
    Macbook Pro 17 ms  DL 20.58 mbps   UL 14.22 mbps
    2010 Mac Pro, 3.33. ghz 6 core with 32 gb of ram running 10.8.2
    Any suggestions.

    Please read this whole message before doing anything. This procedure is a test, not a solution. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it. Step 1 The purpose of this step is to determine whether the problem is localized to your user account. Enable guest logins* and log in as Guest. For instructions, launch the System Preferences application, select Help from the menu bar, and enter “Set up guest users” (without the quotes) in the search box. Don't use the Safari-only “Guest User” login created by “Find My Mac.” While logged in as Guest, you won’t have access to any of your personal files or settings. Applications will behave as if you were running them for the first time. Don’t be alarmed by this; it’s normal. If you need any passwords or other personal data in order to complete the test, memorize, print, or write them down before you begin. Test while logged in as Guest. Same problem? After testing, log out of the guest account and, in your own account, disable it if you wish. Any files you created in the guest account will be deleted automatically when you log out of it. *Note: If you’ve activated “Find My Mac” or FileVault, then you can’t enable the Guest account. The “Guest User” login created by “Find My Mac” is not the same. Create a new account in which to test, and delete it, including its home folder, after testing. Step 2 The purpose of this step is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party system modifications that load automatically at startup or login. Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards. Boot in safe mode* and log in to the account with the problem. The instructions provided by Apple are as follows: 
    Shut down your computer, wait 30 seconds, and then hold down the shift key while pressing the power button.
    When you see the gray Apple logo, release the shift key.
    If you are prompted to log in, type your password, and then hold down the shift key again as you click Log in.
     Safe mode is much slower to boot and run than normal, and some things won’t work at all, including wireless networking on certain Macs. The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin. *Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the boot volume is a software RAID, you can’t boot in safe mode. Test while in safe mode. Same problem? After testing, reboot as usual (i.e., not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of steps 1 and 2.

  • Slow network connection

    Hi,
    Today I updated my Archlinux install using 'pacman -Syu' and since then I've noticed that my samba shares on the Archlinux server seem very slow when accessed from my windows machine. To be honest I hadn't used the shares for sometime so this problem may have existed before I update Archlinux (although it has been faster previously).
    I tested transfers using scp and ftp as well to see how fast the connection was (this is over 100mb ethernet).
    For both scp and ftp the results were the same, 6MB/s when copying to the server and only 3MB/s when copying from the server.
    Shouldn't I be getting faster speeds than this? I've searched the forums and followed a number of things to try and find a cause but haven't had any success.
    Heres the output of ifconfig:
    eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:02:A5:97:81:EC
    inet addr:192.168.11.10 Bcast:192.168.11.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
    UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
    RX packets:388590 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:286622 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
    RX bytes:451634880 (430.7 Mb) TX bytes:225199803 (214.7 Mb)
    lo Link encap:Local Loopback
    inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
    UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
    RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
    RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
    Originally I was connecting to my router using wireless (802.11g) and it was half as fast again.
    Any suggestions?

    I've spent the last two days trying to solve this... I've figured out some more things:
    Using 'ethtool eth0' I get:
    Settings for eth0:
    Supported ports: [ TP MII ]
    Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
    100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
    Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
    Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
    100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
    Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
    Speed: 100Mb/s
    Duplex: Full
    Port: MII
    PHYAD: 1
    Transceiver: internal
    Auto-negotiation: on
    Supports Wake-on: g
    Wake-on: g
    Current message level: 0x00000007 (7)
    Link detected: yes
    With this setup I'm getting ~3.0MB/s when downloading from archlinux machine using scp.
    If I use ethtool to change the settings of eth0 like follows:
    ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off speed 10 duplex full
    I get the a download speed of ~95KB/s
    ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off speed 10 duplex half
    I get the a download speed of ~1.1MB/s
    ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off speed 100 duplex full
    I get the a download speed of ~450KB/s
    ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off speed 100 duplex half
    I get the a download speed of ~3.0MB/s
    Any idea why half duplex works better than full duplex?
    I thought my router may have been the problem so I switched over to a plain 100Mbit switch but it made no diffference.

  • Satellite P755-55265 Painfully slow to connect to wifi?

    Not sure what has happened, but for several months now it takes forever (okay about 15 minutes) to connect to my home wifi.  Any ideas what is going on?
    Thanks in advance!
    Chris

    In the Start Menu's search field, type "Device Manager" and press ENTER. In the Device Manager, expand "Network adapters." What's listed there?
    - Peter

  • Very slow network connection to a Server

    Hello,
    we have got an server with some afp Volumes. On one Volume we have got 7000 folders wiht some files. We i connect with a OSX 10.6.4 to this server, then it takes over 2 minutes to show me all folders. When i connect to the same Server with a 10.4.11 System, so i can see directy all folders.
    How can i fix this issue?

    Make sure Spotlight is not trying to index that connected volume.

Maybe you are looking for