Palm OS 3.5 for my POSE

Can anyone send me the Palm OS 35 or higher?
[email protected]
I'd be thankefull for that
Marco

I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but Palm 3.5 upgrade is a commercial product ($19.95 USD I believe I paid) that needs to be purchased from Palm.

Similar Messages

  • Vendor Report per Plant for Non POs

    Hi
    We want a report that shows the Document date, the Invoice date, the vendor, the Plant, the value for Non POs. Is there any table or report, which can provide us with the mentioned data.
    Quick Response will be appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards
    Edited by: Mehak Malhotra on Feb 16, 2009 9:18 AM
    Edited by: Mehak Malhotra on Feb 16, 2009 9:18 AM

    Hi Vikrant,
    Thank you so much for your quick response. Just wanted to confirm if MB51 includes the vendor with PO and Non POs. As I am specifically looking for Vendors with Non POs. eg a consultant to a plant can also be considered as vendor who has no POs. I am trying to collect that information.
    Thanks & Regards

  • Single ERS Invoice for multiple POs with different GS and same IP

    Dear All,
    I have a Requirement as per the below scenario:
    We need to have single invoice created using ERS (MRRL) functionality in the below scenario:
    Two POs created with different Partner function GS (goods supplier) and same IP (Invoice party partner function).
    Ex:
    GS IP PO GR ERS
    vendor1 10001 4500001 500001 Yes ( GR-IV-Yes, GR done- Yes, same payment terms - 001)
    vendor2 10001 4500002 500002 Yes ( GR-IV-Yes, GR done- Yes, same payment terms - 001)
    When I run ERS for last 1 week (GR) and select the option (Doc selection – per IP or other criteria like GRs posted in last one week) , system should create 1 invoice document. Standard SAP posts 2 documents for each GS.
    I have tried using 2 user exits for MRRL, but none of them work for this functionality.
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Go for  MIRO without MRRL.
    Instead ERS, you can post single  Invoice(MIRO) for multiple POs  for one vendor.
    OR
    Check with Technical consultant and go for development to have single ERS output for multiple ERS invoice documents for single vendor.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Problem in picking base value from PO while doing goods receipt for multiple POs

    Hi,
    Our user is trying to post goods receipt for two purchase orders which have same vendor. After the materials of two POs are allocated in the item detail screen and checked the item ok, system throwing error as "Please check the base value of the item is zero" ( also excise tab does not appear for last three line items). This error does not occur when we are trying to do the goods receipt separately for each POs. Only when we do goods receipt for both the POs together, we are facing this error.
    Please let us know what could be the reason. Is there an issue with standard CIN? Any notes to be applied? Please help!

    Refer these notes for the issue.
    1528009 - MAA: incorrect distribution of goods receipt
    quantities
    and
    1677707 - Determining the valuation type for stock transport orders
    at the time of GI
    For Excise tab not appearing, you have to check J1ID for "Material-ChapterId combination" and "Cenvat Determination".
    Regards
    Binoy

  • Enter Invoice before Service Entry for Service POs?

    Hi,
    I have a question that I am hoping someone can answer.
    As per standard process, in order to enter an invoice for a service PO, the service entry should be posted and accepted.  This is the standard service procurement process, i.e. a 3 way match process for service POs (PO - Service Entry - Invoice).
    We have a request to be able to enter an invoice for a service PO (that will go on block) before entering the service entry sheet; once the service entry sheet is entered and accepted, the invoice should be unblocked and paid.
    Currently, based on our testing in ECC 5.00, the system does NOT allow the user to enter an invoice for a service PO unless:
    1.  the service entry has been posted and accepted in the system (when using GR-IV checked, GR checked); or
    2.  the service PO is created such that the GR is non-valuated (where GR-IV is unchecked):
         a.  GR-IV unchecked
         b.  SR-IV unchecked
         c.  GR checked
         d.  GR non-valuated checked
    In option 2 above, since it is GR non-valuated, as soon as the invoice is posted, the consumption account is hit, and offset by the vendor account (the GR/IR account is not impacted in this scenario).  When the service entry is created and accepted, no accounting postings are made as it is GR non-valuated.  Therefore, it looks very similar to a 2 way match process.
    We also read in SAP Note 1166693 that says an invoice cannot be entered before service entry unless you activate Enterprise Public Sector, however, this conflicts with option 2 mentioned above.
    Has anyone come across a similar requirement, implemented Public sector, option 2 above, or have any other solutions?  Does anyone see any negative impacts with implementing option 2 above?
    Cheers,

    Hi,
    I think you can use this functionality using LIV tolarance key DW ,please explore Spro>MM>LIV>Invoice block>set tolerence limits
    By creating PO IV based you can block invoice till GR is posted, check it
    Thanks
    Diwakar

  • Release strategy for Release POs

    Hi Every one,
    We have a requirement.
    A contract is created and approved as per the regular strategy.
    The releases (POs) are created against it and sent directly to the vendor.
    As the Contract is already approved, standard SAP does not apply the release strategy for the POs created for the contract.
    But the business wants the PO releases too to follow the release strategy.
    Can you please look in to this and let me what changes we need to make this happen.
    Regards
    Pavan

    As the Contract is already approved, standard SAP does not apply the release strategy for the POs created for the contract
    This statement is not correct, it's upto you to use or Not to use Release Process for release Orders (PO) created w.r.to Contract.
    As the table & fields are Common for both Contract & PO release ..you need to choose the PO relevant fields & values in the Release Strategy..
    So that the Release Process is applicable to PO's created w.r.to Contract also..
    For ex: if you use the field purchase Doc category as a Character  in  the Release , it differentiates whether it is PO or Contract..
    So that you can define different Release Strategy for PO & Contract
    Or  if you maintain the Doc type of PO in the Contract Release Strategy in CL20N / CL24N trxn code..
    then the release strategy applies to PO also..

  • Pricing procedure for service pos

    Hi guys,
    WE have defined two pricing procedures i.e. for domestic and for import.  When we create a service PO, domestic pricing procedure is being populated.  Is this the standard functionality or do we need to use a separate pricing procedure for service POs?  If that is the case, how to do it?
    We are using the same document type and same purchase organisation for purchase order for services and materials
    thanks in advance

    Normaly the std domestic price will work for the service but you have service pricing also,
    for the std service pricing
    SPRO-MM-External service management-Maintain conditon for services
    here you will find the service schema and which will defualt in the service PO
    If want to see the service condtion
    go to PO service tab and click on condition icon at the bottom of the screen and it will show you the service conditon with schema

  • Vendor invoie for multiple POs with different payment terms

    Hi,
    We have a vendor which send a single invoice for multiple POs which have different payment terms. Now if we create a single invoice in MIRO, then only a payment term can be applied.
    However user want to pay to the vendor corresponding to the PO terms.
    Please let us know any way apart from creating multiple MIRO documents.
    Regds,
    Nand

    Hi,
    You can achieve so in standard SAP.
    Go to OBY6 and activate the check box "Enable Amount Split" in your company code. Then in MIRO, a new tab will appear in the header as "Amount Split"
    In this tab, you can split the vendor invoice in multiple lines with respective payment method and payment term.
    I hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Profit center update for open POs

    Hi ,
    We have changed profit centers for some materials .
    Now can we update open POs for these materials with new profit center?
    Because , when we try to post GR for these POs , old Profit center gets picked which is not valid now
    Thansk
    Akkshaya

    Dear Akkshaya,
    If PO is created with Account Assignment 'A' / 'K', then you may change the Profit center for the particular material at particular open PO, then it affects at the time of GR also.
    But if the POs with account assignment 'Blank', then the change of profit center at material master does not affect the PO & GRN.
    Change the profit center once there is no open POs for the particular material is suggestable.
    Regards,
    VB

  • GR for Service POS

    HI i would like to know the GR process for Services pos (standard )
    thank you
    ash

    HI  Ashok,
    During Vendor code creation in T-code XK01 of Purchasing  Data Screen under Control Data TAB the following option to be tick marked are as follows.
    GR - Based Inv.Verif.      to be tick marked
    Srv.Based Inv.Ver           to be tick marked
    then the purchase order creating for that vendor and the PO - Item Detail menu Invoice TAB the following option automatically ticked marked based on the above vendor creation option ticked are as follows.
    GR-Bsd IV
    S.Based IV
    After that PO released, if supply PO - GRN made using T-code MIGO and if service PO - Service Entry Sheet (SES) made using T-code ML81N. Based on the above option tick marked GR process internally made for service PO's.
    Hope, it is very useful for you.  
    Regards,
    K.Rajendran

  • How to ensure for material POs, TDS does not get deducted.

    Dear Seniors,
    Single vendor is supplying material and doing some service also.  How do we ensure that for material POs, TDS does not get deducted.
    Regards
    KVKR

    Hi kkvr,
    As i see your requirement is to execute MRRL alongwith the performing a proper TDS deduction and also using single vendor.
    There is no Standard SAP solution for this, as a workaround you will have two options for doing the same
    Option 1 : Create a different vendor code then you can run mrrl for the vendor code one for service and another for material
    The demerits of this solution is duplication of vendor code, which results in not having proper information for the SCM personnel for the purpose of vendor evaluation and vendor reconcilation
    Option2:
    you need to enahce the Purchase order at line item level with the a custom fields for the WHT tax code to be selected at the time of PO creation. For this you need to do a screen enahcement in PO and also at the time of providing the popup for selection it should only dipslay the wht codes available in the vendor master so that proper control on the tax code selection will happen.
    The practical issues here is the po creation person should have the knowledge of the tds code which you need to see whether it is possible or not or you can also suggest that finance controller should be part of po release startegy to check these po's to ensure the correct tds code populated.
    Further to this you need to also perform additional enahcement changes for the selected tds codes in the po it should be replaced at the time of mrrl transaction making other tds tax codes base as 0 or removal of tds codes not applicable in the exit.
    This exit with the help of the abaper you will be able to find hte standard enhacements available for mrrl and code the same over there so that at the time of posting this will happen.
    Further, to this while writing the logic you can also further stream line it as for material po's the tds not to be deducted at all so that user input for the material po's can be avoided and it is required only for service po's this disticntion you can do with the item category.
    With this you can perform the enahncement with a minimal changement to achieve your purpose.
    Do let me know if you have any quereies,
    Regards,
    Bharathi

  • Output message type not triggered for few POs

    ---PRs got created manually. then PRs converted into POs through background job (me59n).
    ( 25 PRs got created manually with same vendor and pur.org combination then all PRs converted into POs through ME59N. In that 20 PRs had message type automatically but remaining POs haven't got the message type )
    Condition record exists with vendor/pur.org combination.
    and all IMG settings are correct.
    medium is 8 (special function).
    and not able to replicate the issue in quality systems.
    Please Advise.
    Thanks in advance.

    PRs will not get any message type, POs will get a message record.
    How is the situation now?
    Did  you get 20 POs only, or do you have 25 POs where just 20 have a message record?
    In the first case  convert the PR manually to a PO manually and see if you get a message record. You should not enter anything manually, it is supposed to work without entering anything manually because it was meant for auto PO. In case you have to enter anything manually, then this might be an indicator why auto PO could not work.
    if the latter case, then compare a PO with and without message record on the fields that should match with your condition record.
    Do you expect the same message type for all POs, are they all in the same purchasing organisation?
    Read and check what is mentioned in KBA 1829682 - Output type is not determined in Purchase order

  • GR Based IV Tick for SERVICE POs

    Hi Friends,
    How can we avoid GR Based IV Tick tht is defaulted by system for SERVICE POs with item category D.
    When i tried to remove this Tick, system given error message, ": Combination of GR/IR Control not allowed for valuated GR"
    I want to remove this GR Based IV Tick for service PO to enable successful automatic removal of invoice blocking for such POs when GR is posted for required balance qty in system after 1st invoice is blocked by system for Price variance.
    in short, how can we have SERVICE PO without GR Based IV Tick ?

    1 ) when we remove GR Tick& GR Based IV Tick,
    If you dont want to post GR and GR Based IV Tick, is required for post the invoice.Practically this combination is not possible.
    2 ) When we tick Non valuated GR & Remove GR Based IV Tick
    .if you want to post GR and you dont want to any accounting document for perticular GR.Remove GR Based IV Tick will help you PO based invoice verfication.

  • MIGO for Multiple POs

    Hi Guru's
      I need to do migo for multiple POs ( i.e more than 8 PO's)
    POs  having same material from same vendor differ by QTy.
    Is there is any Tcode to achieve this.
    Thanks in advance.
    regards
    Anand

    Dear Anand,
    In MIGO transaction, Enter the PO's one by one. Once you enter a PO, the line items would get copied and the PO field would become blank. This way, we can enter multiple PO's belonging to a single vendor
    for more detail please check this link.
    Re: GR for multiple PO
    regards,
    PRavin Kadam

  • Visiting Palm Springs from Canada for a month. where can I get a sim card?

    I'm visiting Palm Springs from Canada for a month. Where can I get a good SIM card and plan?

    Airport if you're flying in...also check the nearest Mall that has an Apple Store there is usually an AT&T kiosk nearby.

Maybe you are looking for

  • DNS pointing to both internal and external addresses

    I am currently going through the very helpful lynda.com OS X Server 10.5 videos to set up an Advanced Server from the ground up. DNS was set up first and for the most part everything has gone for me just like Sean shows in the movies. Our company's d

  • How to assign a parent or child process to BPEL process Dynamically

    Hi friends, root_id (varchar) - the conversation id of the instance at the top of the invocation tree. Suppose A -> B -> C, root( B ) = A, root( C ) = A, parent( B )= A, parent( C ) = B. This instance, instance at the top of the tree will not have th

  • Excel problem while sending report output as mail!!

    Hi, I am sending an excel file as attachment in the mail id provided on the selection screen but once we open the attachment the first column value is not displayed in excel , but if we click on the excel cell twice , it does display the content othe

  • Related to post" navigation link on column values"

    Hi, when i ick on link for column values it should navigate to detail report based on manager name dynamically how can i achieve this one? any help.................plz

  • Cannot create stored procedure in Azure SQL database

    When I try to create a stored procedure using Management Studio (Snippet follows use PPSC_Sky_Data go /****** Object:  StoredProcedure [dbo].[sp_RegisterProd]    Script Date: 17-02-2015 17:52:50 ******/ SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON G