GR Based IV Tick for SERVICE POs

Hi Friends,
How can we avoid GR Based IV Tick tht is defaulted by system for SERVICE POs with item category D.
When i tried to remove this Tick, system given error message, ": Combination of GR/IR Control not allowed for valuated GR"
I want to remove this GR Based IV Tick for service PO to enable successful automatic removal of invoice blocking for such POs when GR is posted for required balance qty in system after 1st invoice is blocked by system for Price variance.
in short, how can we have SERVICE PO without GR Based IV Tick ?

1 ) when we remove GR Tick& GR Based IV Tick,
If you dont want to post GR and GR Based IV Tick, is required for post the invoice.Practically this combination is not possible.
2 ) When we tick Non valuated GR & Remove GR Based IV Tick
.if you want to post GR and you dont want to any accounting document for perticular GR.Remove GR Based IV Tick will help you PO based invoice verfication.

Similar Messages

  • GR for Service POS

    HI i would like to know the GR process for Services pos (standard )
    thank you
    ash

    HI  Ashok,
    During Vendor code creation in T-code XK01 of Purchasing  Data Screen under Control Data TAB the following option to be tick marked are as follows.
    GR - Based Inv.Verif.      to be tick marked
    Srv.Based Inv.Ver           to be tick marked
    then the purchase order creating for that vendor and the PO - Item Detail menu Invoice TAB the following option automatically ticked marked based on the above vendor creation option ticked are as follows.
    GR-Bsd IV
    S.Based IV
    After that PO released, if supply PO - GRN made using T-code MIGO and if service PO - Service Entry Sheet (SES) made using T-code ML81N. Based on the above option tick marked GR process internally made for service PO's.
    Hope, it is very useful for you.  
    Regards,
    K.Rajendran

  • Enter Invoice before Service Entry for Service POs?

    Hi,
    I have a question that I am hoping someone can answer.
    As per standard process, in order to enter an invoice for a service PO, the service entry should be posted and accepted.  This is the standard service procurement process, i.e. a 3 way match process for service POs (PO - Service Entry - Invoice).
    We have a request to be able to enter an invoice for a service PO (that will go on block) before entering the service entry sheet; once the service entry sheet is entered and accepted, the invoice should be unblocked and paid.
    Currently, based on our testing in ECC 5.00, the system does NOT allow the user to enter an invoice for a service PO unless:
    1.  the service entry has been posted and accepted in the system (when using GR-IV checked, GR checked); or
    2.  the service PO is created such that the GR is non-valuated (where GR-IV is unchecked):
         a.  GR-IV unchecked
         b.  SR-IV unchecked
         c.  GR checked
         d.  GR non-valuated checked
    In option 2 above, since it is GR non-valuated, as soon as the invoice is posted, the consumption account is hit, and offset by the vendor account (the GR/IR account is not impacted in this scenario).  When the service entry is created and accepted, no accounting postings are made as it is GR non-valuated.  Therefore, it looks very similar to a 2 way match process.
    We also read in SAP Note 1166693 that says an invoice cannot be entered before service entry unless you activate Enterprise Public Sector, however, this conflicts with option 2 mentioned above.
    Has anyone come across a similar requirement, implemented Public sector, option 2 above, or have any other solutions?  Does anyone see any negative impacts with implementing option 2 above?
    Cheers,

    Hi,
    I think you can use this functionality using LIV tolarance key DW ,please explore Spro>MM>LIV>Invoice block>set tolerence limits
    By creating PO IV based you can block invoice till GR is posted, check it
    Thanks
    Diwakar

  • Pricing procedure for service pos

    Hi guys,
    WE have defined two pricing procedures i.e. for domestic and for import.  When we create a service PO, domestic pricing procedure is being populated.  Is this the standard functionality or do we need to use a separate pricing procedure for service POs?  If that is the case, how to do it?
    We are using the same document type and same purchase organisation for purchase order for services and materials
    thanks in advance

    Normaly the std domestic price will work for the service but you have service pricing also,
    for the std service pricing
    SPRO-MM-External service management-Maintain conditon for services
    here you will find the service schema and which will defualt in the service PO
    If want to see the service condtion
    go to PO service tab and click on condition icon at the bottom of the screen and it will show you the service conditon with schema

  • Srv-Based IV indicator in Service POs

    Hi all,
    What's the difference between the Srv-Based IV indicator and GR-Based IV indicator in the Invoice tab of the Serivce PO. I am aware of the fact that in order to do Serv Entry Shett in ML81N, the "Goods Receipt" indicator in the Delviery tabl of the PO has to be flagged. When this is check GR-Based IV ind is automatically flagged.
    What's the effect of Srv-Based IV indicator in the PO in MIRO?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    The service based IV is aimilar to GR based IV and the service lines entered in Serviece Entry sheet are carried to Invoice verification.
    When u set the serivce based IV the GR based IV is automatically ticked because for the reason that,
    when u post a service entry sheet, along with it system automatically posts a material document with movement type 101 for accounting postings.(similar to a GR posting for a material in MIGO). You can see this in PO history once u complete a Service entry sheet.
    regards,
    MRao

  • GR Based IV tick for Import Purchase Order

    Hello Friends
    Whats the significance of keeping GR based IV check box as unchecked for import purchase order.I am selecting this indicator and still i am able to do the process as follows
    1. ME21n 2. MIRO (BOE capturing) 3. MIGO 4. Post Excise invoice 4. MIRO (Material Vendor)
    Still could not understand why this indicator is suggested to keep as unchecked for import purchase order processing.
    Please clarify.
    Regards
    Vivek sharma

    Hi
    For import POs , it is required that the GRbased Inv ver key removed, as we need to pay the amount due to the customs. We are yet to receive the material in our Goodown i.e goods receipt is yet to be done but payment to Customs has to be made  only then material GR can be carried out. You have to enter manula values(amounts) for this to be processed. What you said  reg the MIRO rpocessing evenefore Material receipt, this is possible , duirng MIRO you need to anter the quanity and the correspondingamount to be processed. While if you have GRbased Inv.verification then you need not enter material quanity or value manually which is automatic.
    Regards

  • GR based invoice tick for Import

    Hello all,
    I have created Scheduling agreement for import in which GR based invoice tick comes automatically from vendor master. Now, I want to remove GR based invoice tick from Vendor master. I have made GR based invoice tick optional in SA screen layout and removed GR based tick in Vendor master but when i'm going to save it, system gives error,  "fill required entry"
    Now,I have made GR based tick invoice optional in Field selection group and removed GR based invoice tick and save it...but still getting the error, "The supplier has the same Tax Code".
    Please suggest.

    The message number is designed by your organization - ABAP team..
    Go to SE91 enter the message class FB, then check for the no. 000.
    Check the message where it used.. Consult with your abaper for more details about the message..

  • PO item overview with item details for service POs

    Hi experts,
    Is there any standard report to see the PO Item overview short description data with Item-services details in case of service POs.
    We raise the service pos with service short description in  Item overview and against that short description we maintain service nos in item-services.
    we want to see the PO wise item overview short description with item services in one report.
    we have already seen ME2S,MSRV1 to 6,ME80FN, but its not serve our purpose.

    hi
    go to me80fn
    here press shift F4
    then u will get fields to add here at item level select the item cat and acct assignment
    now give item cat 9 and acct assignment as k
    then execute
    now u will get the report ,choose po histry mode here u will get what u want
    similarly u can try it with me2n
    regards
    kunal

  • GR extraction for Service POs

    Hello all,
    I am trying to create a custom datasource for extracting GR data for service purchase orders.
    I need information such as -
    PO number , Service entry sheet number, Service/activity number, acceptance indicator, accept/reject qty, material document number, movement type etc.
    I am considering tables -
    EKPO, ESLH, ESLL, ESSR and EKBE.
    Has anyone worked on such extractor? Could you please share your learnings with me?
    What is the best way to achieve this - a join or a function module?
    Is delta possible? On what field?
    Any clues / information / advice is highly appreciated.
    Many thanks in advance!
    Regards
    Sanjyot

    I am posting some sample data. The ESLH packno does not match with ESSR packno.
    In below example there are 2 services, out of which only one, 3000000003,  is accepted with ACT_WERT = 10.
    EKPO                              
    EBELN     EBELP     PACKNO                    
    4300000000     10     289271                    
    ESLH                              
    PACKNO     FPACKNO     HPACKNO     EBELN             EBELP          
    289271     289271     289271     4300000000     10          
    289272     289271     289271     4300000000     10          
    ESLL                              
    PACKNO     INTROW     EXTROW     SRVPO          PACKAGE     SUB-PACKNO     ACT_WERT
    289271     1     0                    X     289272                       0
    289272     2     10     3000000003          0                      10
    289272     3     20     3000000002          0                       0
    ESSR                              
    LBLNI                   PACKNO     EBELN               EBELP          
    1000052342          289279     4300000000               10          
    EKBE                              
    EBELN           EBELP     VGABE     BELNR             BEWTP     LFBNR     
    4300000000     10     9     1000052342     D     1000052342     
    4300000000     10     1     50000451255     E     1000052342     
    WHAT I NEED                               
    EBELN              EBELP     LBLNI               SRVPO       ACT_WERT     BELNR     
    4300000000     10     1000052342     3000000003     10     50000451255     

  • Multiple Account Assignment issue with BAPI_PO_CREATE1 for service POs

    Whle creating service PO through BAPI_PO_CREATE1, The account assignments at the service line items were not being added correctly at the item level, instead they are getting split further wrt tax jurisdiction. This is occuring when an item have multiple service line items with mutltiple account assignments.
    The sample code is below, and the all the internal tables and structure were related to BAPI_PO_CREATE1. Tried with BADI ME_TAX_FROM_ADDRESS and User Exit enhancement SAPL2012, which were not helpful for this particular scenario.
    Item Details
    W_BAPI_ITEM-PO_ITEM = 1.
    W_BAPI_ITEMX-PO_ITEM = 1.
    W_BAPI_ITEM-ITEM_CAT = D.
    W_BAPI_ITEMX-ITEM_CAT = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_ITEM-ACCTASSCAT = K.
    W_BAPI_ITEMX-ACCTASSCAT = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_ITEM-PLANT = USMP. Tax Jurisdiction code 3604931001
    W_BAPI_ITEMX-PLANT = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_ITEM-MATL_GROUP = IT37.
    W_BAPI_ITEMX-MATL_GROUP = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_ITEM-QUANTITY = 1.
    W_BAPI_ITEMX-QUANTITY = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_ITEM-PRICE_UNIT = 1.
    W_BAPI_ITEMX-PRICE_UNIT = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_ITEM-PO_UNIT = LE.
    W_BAPI_ITEMX-PO_UNIT = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_ITEM-NET_PRICE = 100.
    W_BAPI_ITEMX-NET_PRICE = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_ITEM-PCKG_NO = 3456.
    W_BAPI_ITEMX-PCKG_NO = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_ITEM-PREQ_NAME = RTPTS02.
    W_BAPI_ITEMX-PREQ_NAME = 'X'.
    APPEND W_BAPI_ITEM TO IT_BAPI_ITEM.
    APPEND W_BAPI_ITEMX TO IT_BAPI_ITEMX.
    Delivery address details - Tax Jurisdiction 3305923401
    W_BAPI_ADDRDEL-PO_ITEM = 1.
    W_BAPI_ADDRDEL-NAME = COR.
    W_BAPI_ADDRDEL-NAME_2 = Chairman.
    W_BAPI_ADDRDEL-BUILD_LONG = 1001R
    W_BAPI_ADDRDEL-CITY = plainview.
    W_BAPI_ADDRDEL-STREET = old country road.
    W_BAPI_ADDRDEL-POSTL_COD1 = 11803.
    W_BAPI_ADDRDEL-COUNTRY = US.
    W_BAPI_ADDRDEL-REGION = NY.
    APPEND W_BAPI_ADDRDEL TO IT_BAPI_ADDRDEL.
    First Account Assignment - 3310300441
    W_BAPI_POACNT-SERIAL_NO = 1.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-SERIAL_NO = 1.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-SERIAL_NOX = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-CREAT_DATE  = 11/03/2010.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-CREAT_DATE  = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-QUANTITY = 0.75.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-QUANTITY  = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-DISTR_PERC = 75.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-DISTR_PERC  = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-NET_VALUE = 75 .
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-NET_VALUE  = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-PO_ITEM = 1.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-PO_ITEM = 1.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-PO_ITEMX = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-GL_ACCOUNT = 641099.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-GL_ACCOUNT  = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-COSTCENTER =  10010394.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-COSTCENTER = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-CO_AREA = 1234.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-CO_AREA = 'X'.
    APPEND W_BAPI_POACNT TO IT_BAPI_POACNT.
    APPEND W_BAPI_POACNTX TO IT_BAPI_POACNTX.
    Second Account Assignment
    W_BAPI_POACNT-SERIAL_NO = 2.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-SERIAL_NO = 2.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-SERIAL_NOX = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-CREAT_DATE  = 11/03/2010.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-CREAT_DATE  = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-QUANTITY = 0.25.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-QUANTITY  = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-DISTR_PERC = 25.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-DISTR_PERC  = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-NET_VALUE = 25 .
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-NET_VALUE  = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-PO_ITEM = 1.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-PO_ITEM = 1.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-PO_ITEMX = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-GL_ACCOUNT = 641099.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-GL_ACCOUNT  = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-COSTCENTER =  10010393.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-COSTCENTER = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_POACNT-CO_AREA = 1234.
    W_BAPI_POACNTX-CO_AREA = 'X'.
    APPEND W_BAPI_POACNT TO IT_BAPI_POACNT.
    APPEND W_BAPI_POACNTX TO IT_BAPI_POACNTX.
    Service Item detials
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-OUTL_IND = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-SUBPCKG_NO =  3457.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-LINE_NO = 1.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-PCKG_NO = 3456.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-EXT_LINE = 0000000000.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-QUANTITY = 0.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-BASE_UOM = 0.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-PRICE_UNIT = 0.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-GR_PRICE = 0.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-SHORT_TEXT = 0.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-MATL_GROUP = 0.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-DISTRIB = 0.
    APPEND W_BAPI_SERVICE TO IT_BAPI_SERVICE.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-OUTL_IND = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-LINE_NO = 2.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-PCKG_NO = 3457.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-EXT_LINE = 0000000010.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-QUANTITY = 10.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-BASE_UOM = STD.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-PRICE_UNIT = 0.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-GR_PRICE = 5.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-SHORT_TEXT = Cabling Services1.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-MATL_GROUP = IT37.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-DISTRIB = 2.
    APPEND W_BAPI_SERVICE TO IT_BAPI_SERVICE.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-OUTL_IND = 'X'.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-LINE_NO = 3.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-PCKG_NO = 3457.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-EXT_LINE = 0000000020.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-QUANTITY = 10.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-BASE_UOM = STD.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-PRICE_UNIT = 0.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-GR_PRICE = 5.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-SHORT_TEXT = Cabling Services2.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-MATL_GROUP = IT37.
    W_BAPI_SERVICE-DISTRIB = 2.
    APPEND W_BAPI_SERVICE TO IT_BAPI_SERVICE.
    Service Account assignment details
    W_ACC_SERVICE-PCKG_NO = 3457.
    W_ACC_SERVICE-LINE_NO = 2.
    W_ACC_SERVICE-SERNO_LINE = 1.
    W_ACC_SERVICE-SERIAL_NO = 1.   "Account Assignment Link
    W_ACC_SERVICE-NET_VALUE = .
    W_ACC_SERVICE-QUANTITY = 50 .
    W_ACC_SERVICE-PERCENTAGE = 100 .
    APPEND W_ACC_SERVICE TO IT_ACC_SERVICE.
    W_ACC_SERVICE-PCKG_NO = 3457.
    W_ACC_SERVICE-LINE_NO = 3.
    W_ACC_SERVICE-SERNO_LINE = 1.
    W_ACC_SERVICE-SERIAL_NO = 1.   "Account Assignment Link
    W_ACC_SERVICE-NET_VALUE = .
    W_ACC_SERVICE-QUANTITY = 50 .
    W_ACC_SERVICE-PERCENTAGE = 50 .
    APPEND W_ACC_SERVICE TO IT_ACC_SERVICE.
    W_ACC_SERVICE-PCKG_NO = 3457.
    W_ACC_SERVICE-LINE_NO = 3.
    W_ACC_SERVICE-SERNO_LINE = 1.
    W_ACC_SERVICE-SERIAL_NO = 2.   "Account Assignment Link
    W_ACC_SERVICE-NET_VALUE = .
    W_ACC_SERVICE-QUANTITY = 50 .
    W_ACC_SERVICE-PERCENTAGE = 50 .
    APPEND W_ACC_SERVICE TO IT_ACC_SERVICE.
    EKKN table entries:
    When created thru ME21N with the same set of data,which is expected
    ZEKKN            MENGE            NETWR  SAKTO        KOSTL
    01               0.750            75.00  0000641099   0010010394
    02               0.250            25.00  0000641099   0010010393
    But through BAPI_PO_CREATE1, the below split is being done with respect to Tax Jurisdiction code.
    01               0.500            50.00  0000641099   0010010394
    02               0.250            25.00  0000641099   0010010394
    03               0.250            25.00  0000641099   0010010393
    Please advice the solution.
    PS: there were different tax jurisdiction codes were being determined.
    Plant, Cost Center and Delivery Address.

    Hi,
    To commit BAPI or to run it properly , you need to fulfill all required data for BAPI.
    You can go to BAPI documentation to check for mandetory parameters and also check with Function consultant for more data and confifuration/
    Reward if useful!

  • Automatic tax code determination for service POs

    Hi
    Can anyone tell  about the possibilities of automatic tax code determination for the service purchase orders.
    Thanks in advance
    Durai

    The tax indicator is used in the automatic determination of the tax code 
    in Purchasing.                                                                               
    The tax code can be determined automatically within the framework of tax 
    determination (via the conditions).                                      
    Tax indicators, which can come from the service master record,           
    Customizing, or the purchasing document, are used in this process. The   
    system determines the tax code on the basis of the combination of these  
    tax indicators.                                                                               
    Automatic determination of the tax code is useful, for example, if       
    different tax rates apply to different groups of services.

  • POC based Results Analysis for Service Order/ Contract

    Issue resolved. Please close the message.
    Hi Friends,
    We have a process where we create a service order and plan costs on the order.
    Later a contract will be created with billing plan. The contract is assigned to service order manually.
    After actual costs are booked to the service order the same is settled to Contract.
    When I run RA for Contract I dont see the Activity rate planned costs so the POC is not giving correct results.
    The planned material costs are being updated though.
    I have mapped the activity cost element to a line id and COS in RA configuration.
    Please let me know if I am missing anything here.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Vamsi
    Edited by: VSS on Oct 23, 2010 10:49 PM

    Hi,
    We need to implement the following OSS note:
    OSS Note 1259154.
    Also please check if 1159784
    is relevant for your system.
    Thanks,
    Vamsi

  • Significance of service based IV tick in PO

    Hi All
    What is the significance of service based iv tick in service PO?
    Regards
    Satish Kumar

    >
    satish kumar wrote:
    > Hi All
    >
    > What is the significance of service based iv tick in service PO?
    >
    > Regards
    > Satish Kumar
    This check indicates that MIRO can take place against Service entry sheet as well as PO. Same is the case with GR based IR, where IR can take place against GR and PO, if these checks are enabled.
    Check this helpfull link for further details on this check:
    Re: Invoice verification before SES acceptance

  • Item based approval for Service Confirmation

    Hello All,
    Is it possible to build item based approval workflow for Service Confirmation using Application controlled approach in SRM? Which standard template should I use for this?
    Please let me know.
    Thanks,
    A

    Hi Diego,
    In my understanding you want to define one or several level of approval depending on the CC assignement on each item.
    lets take an example:
    CC1 owner approver1, CC2 owner approver2 and CC3 approver3
    For a SC:
    -Item 1: 20% on CC1, and 80% on CC2
    -Item 2: 20% on CC1, and 60% on CC2, and 20% on CC3
    Then in the item level BADI, you'll define:
    -Item1:
    Level1 ==> approver1
    Level2 ==> approver2
    -Item2:
    Level1 ==> approver1
    Level2 ==> approver2
    Level3 ==> approver3
    I had this requirement on a project, and the hard part was not the BADI implementation, but the CC owner link with the SRM users (cause all approvers have to be declared on the SRM, and integrated in the SRM org plan).
    Regards.
    Vadim

  • GR BASED IV TICK

    Dear All,
      I have so many scheduling agreements of previous months with respective info records for which "GR based IV" indicator is not ticked & for vendor also its not ticked & the requirement is to get the indicator :GR based IV" ticked for all the scheduling agreements.
      Now the user is trying to tick that indicator in vendor master & thot that it would reflect in S.Agreement. But the thing is system takes precedence of inforecord. if the tick is not there in Info record, it wont pick.
    Now the question is ..if i tick that indicator in all the info records, whether the Scheduling agreements will adopt that or how to go about it.
    Final requirement is to get the tick in "GR Based IV".

    Hi,
    Select the concerned PO document type and in screen layout make the GR Based IV as required entry .
    Dhruba

Maybe you are looking for

  • BdAqua, anyone.. I need some SERIOUS advise here..

    For many of you I have been on these forums for quite sometime and now I am in need of SERIOUS advice. With the acquisition of a Power Mac G5 Quad taking over most of my everyday activities which I do on my mac pro, I am in desperate need of trying t

  • Acrobat 8 Slow Encoding from Word, Missing Text in Result!

    I am getting so frustrated with Acrobat 8.x.. not only do I have to put up with the 90-second hang after launching ANY PDF doc, but when I author docs out of Word and Quark, many times it takes ten minutes or more to export a 1-page doc and 40% of th

  • Boot Up BIOS Error Beeps????

    I have installed WinXP SP2 and my system is booting fine.  When I boot my system up however I get what sounds like BIOS error beeps (AMI 1.3).  I've scanned the threads and checked the beep pattern against the documented patterns but cannot find a ma

  • Error: COUNT field incorrect in jdbc

    hello please help me out!!!!!! am trying to retrive data (ID) which was updated before in this program. now am getting error:COUNT field incorrect. and can it be displayed by using JOptionPane? pst=con.prepareStatement("select ID from db1 where NAME=

  • QFS don�t update File System space after a failover

    When I do a fail-over (get down a master node of device QFS) while I delete a file the space on it (FS) is inconsistent (df command show mayor space than du command) and I have to do a file System Check on it to get free space.