Parallel accounting  cost objects in non leading ledger

Hi Gurus,
I have implemented parallel accounting and have my leading ledger in INR and the non leading leading ledger in USD.
also i have the FI profit center and segment activated and for segmental reporting i am using the same.
I now need to report on segments in the non leading ledger also.
can i transfer the account assignments (like profit center and segment) to the non leading ledgers also.
Points will be awarded
regards

I've tried it.
It works properly.
I created a movement type for Area 30 Only.
Anyway I had to modifyT093A: 30 IAS Depreciation Area now has '00' in filed WRTAFB."Adoption of values from depreciation area" like the Area 01.
I have to capitalize values (also negative; correction) only in Area 30 (IAS), not also in Area 01 (APC zero value).
There's no other way to obtain that?
Depreciation Area       01 (master area)                      30 (IFRS)     
APC                               0                                               1000

Similar Messages

  • Transfer of account assignment objects to non leading ledger in New GL

    Hi Gurus,
    I have implemented parallel accounting and have my leading ledger in INR and the non leading leading ledger in USD.
    also i have the FI profit center and segment activated and for segmental reporting i am using the same.
    I now need to report on segments in the non leading ledger also.
    can i transfer the account assignments (like profit center and segment) to the non leading ledgers also.
    regards

    Hi,
    Does this mean that once the scenerio is assigned in ledger in new gl i can do cost center allocations (assessment/distributions) in non leading ledger also?
    eg i have parallel internal reporting system too.
    if yes,
    can you let me have config document for  parallel accounting and scenerio assignment.
    Regards,
    Rishikesh

  • Post open item management account into non-leading ledger independently

    I want to use FB50L to post an open item management account balance value into non-leading ledger, the system throws out an error.
    I know it can not delete the sign ---open item.
    Could anyone give some advice?
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    Open item management account  as an adjustment account.
    By your description the adjustment account for GL account is the same
    at Trx OBA1, so this is the reason for error message
    FAGL_FC_VAL does not allow Open item management account as an adjustment account
    in standard because normally there are more than one ledger set up,
    and  Open item management account must be valid for all ledgers (as the clearing can't be
    carried out by ledger). If FAGL_FC_VAL allows this and made the posting
    on one specific non-ledger, this basic rule can't be fulfilled.
    It's same as trx. FB50L that doesn't allow Open item management account to be
    entered in case of ledger-specific posting.
    FAGL_POST_SERVICE012. This is justified because open items must be
    made valid for all ledgers in the client, and even if there's only one
    ledger (0L) in your case that this is also considered as 'ledger-
    specific' posting.
    Please also check the SAP note:
    1239651 FAGL_FC_VALUATION: Posting with a ledger
    However you can apply SAP note 884639 to remove the ledger group from
    FAGL_FC_VAL posting, and this way the Open item management account can be
    used as an adjustment account. However please note that SAP note 884639
    is MODIFICATION and the coding could be overwritten by applying the
    support package or with upgrade.
    Thanks,
    Raviteja

  • Posting in Open item managed accounts in Non Leading ledger

    Hello,
    I would like to know how can we post into a open item managed G/L account in the non-leading ledger only.
    If it is not possible, then what could be the reason for the same?
    Regards,
    Sameer

    As per the New GL design it is not possible to post an entry specific to non lead ledger  to a GL which is open item managed. The reason is very clear. In non lead ledgers we do not do clearing we only do adjustments entries. Clearing can only be done in a lead ledger. Ask yourself about making a payment to a vendor from non lead ledger. It is not at all sensible.
    What you need to do to handle this scenario is to create a new GL (if it is a B/S account then mark it as line item managed and in the text you need to mention that this account is specific to non Lead ledger postings. There is no way in ECC 6.0 to flag a GL for non lead ledgers only. Once you create this account you can post an entry to this using T Code FB50L. From financials standpoint you can club this new GL in the same group or number range where you have the same account with open item managed checkbox.
    SAP is working to extend the clearing functionality to non lead ledgers but I am not sure which enhancement pack will have this feature. Till that time you need to follow the solution as described above.
    Hope this helps

  • Co object assignment to a non-leading ledger account while posting

    Hi,
    while I m trying to post a document for non-leading ledger account which is opened as a cost element. for leading ledger it has to be filled by cost objects but in non-leading ledger is it a must ? In my opinion in non-leading ledger postings doesnt need to have cost objects because in CO it contains only leading ledger. am I wrong ?

    Dear Gizem,
    Refer note
    804753  - FlexGL: Data transfer to CO from parallel ledger
    regards
    Waman

  • GL account balance for Non Leading Ledger

    Hi,
    I am trying to get GL account balance for Non leading ledger.
    I am able to get Balance sheet GL account balance  for leading ledger using 'BAPI_GL_GETGLACCPERIODBALANCES', but I am unable to do so.
    For P&L GLs, requirement is to get internal order wise account balance. I am able to get GL balance for leading ledger using documents in BSEG.
    Any idea on how we get GL balance for non leading ledger?
    Thanks in Advance.
    Tejas

    Hello,
    I am not sure if I understand quesition correct.
    1. Internal order per ledger - this link might give you some information.
    FB50L FI-posting to an internal order
    You can report internal orders per cost element (acutal and plan)
    Use reports in: SAP Menue/ Information Systems/Accounting/Controlling/Reports for Internal Orders/Summarization Reports or/and More Reports
    as an instance: S_ALR_87013010
    direct output to Excel and drill down functionality for details.
    2. GL balances per ledger: use F.08 and select ledger, then you have report per ledger
    Let me know if this is what you have expected.
    all the best Erwin

  • Cost center not updated when posting in non leading ledger

    Hello FI Experts
    I have two ledgers - Leading and Non Leading Ledger.
    When I posted expense entry it updated both the ledgers and updated cost center value. This updated value i checked in cost center report KSB1.
    For Ex: Rs. 1,00,000
    Now I posted another expense entry in non leading ledger only. For Ex: Rs.50,000
    How ever this entry didn't updated cost center report value. I checked in report KSB1
    So I want to know:
    1. Are there any cost center reports / profit center reports in controlling module where I can get non leading ledger specific amount in cost centers and profit centers
    2. Is it possible to run assesment and distribution cycle, cost reposting and other CO transactions for non leading ledger amount
    Deepak

    Hi Deepak.
    You can verify is the cost center was posted on document running tcode SE16N on the FALGFLEXA table, put the document number to do research.
    After you can trying to post the new document through Tcode FB50L choosing or not a legder specific, then verify the document was posted correctly running the Tcodes SKb1 or Se16N with FAGLFLEXA table again.
    Also you can check this link Checking the Allocation of General Ledgers to Cost Centres
    Kind Regards
    Jandoval Nascimento

  • Profir center determination in non leading ledger in tcode ABAA

    Hello experts,
    We are working on ECC6.0 and parallel ledger is already activiated. To post the unplanned depreciation only in the non leading ledger, I have created new transaction  type and attched it to non leading dpereciation area. After  entring through transaction code ABAA, when I run ASKB to post the entry in the financial books, I get the profit cetner determination error. Entry is as under:
    Depreciation A/c ..........Dr
    To Accumualted Depreciation Account.
    Now for depreication account being expense account and having cost element system is asking for the profit center (cost center).
    My question is, how can I guide the system to determine the profit center from cost center mentioned in asset master data?
    Please advise.
    Shailesh

    Dear sir,
    Please check your seetings in T.code ACSET. Whether KOSTL as a account assignment object defined or not. If not then please make the entry, by doing so system will check the cost center in asset master and will pick the profit center maintained accordingly.
    As well check account assignment type as a 02 Depreciation Run
    I hope this may help and solve the issue.
    Regards,
    Pankaj A Bhalerao.

  • New Gl- report with some details of CO for the non leading ledger

    Hi,
    I am using New GL. I have 2 ledgers (local ledger and USGAAP); The local ledger is the leading ledger, so is the one which impacts to CO. I need some information in CO (mainly cost center) for the non-leading ledger (USGAAP). I am thinking in create a report painter with the table of non-leading ledger, but I cannot find a table in NGL which save the CO object and can choose the ledger. I am looking too, this information by a standard report, but I cannot find one.
    Any idea about a solution of this situation?
    Thanks,
    Cecilia

    Hi Cecilia, did you assign Cost Center scenario (FIN_CCA) to your ledgers?, otherwise NGL Tables (FAGLFLEXT and FAGLFLEXA) won't have Cost Center field populated. If this is the case, maybe your only option is use BKPF then BSEG + BSEG_ADD (Entry View of Accounting Document for Additional Ledgers) and pull Cost Center from there.
    I hope this helps.

  • Reposting from Leading ledger to non leading ledger using RGURECGLFLEX

    Hi,
    We have a situation where we are trying to post documents from 2007 that are in the leading ledger to a non-leading ledger. When we run the report RGURECGLFLEX it produces a list of documents that cannot be posted with the error "Document NI1N 4900000000 2007 is not relevant for your target ledger ZR"
    When we did some investigation we found that the ledger group was specified with the leading ledger 0L on this and many other documents.
    Is there a way that we can get these documents to post to the non leading ledger and ignore ledger group field / functionality? 
    Do we need to go through and remove the ledger group 0L on each of the postings and re-run the report RGURECGLFLEX?
    We are looking forward to a solution
    Thanks & Regards
    Martin Weakley

    Hi Martin,
    From the SAP Service market place you should find a document
    [https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000688032&]
    FAQsGeneral Ledger in mySAPERPSolution
    In this document you will see the following section "Parallel Financial Accounting and Ledgers"
    under which you will see the following stated
    If a customer decides to use the New GL but only initially uses a single parallel
    ledger (the leading Ledger). The customer then processes some transactions
    for a few months and then decides to use an additional ledger onthe system. Is
    there a program that you can run to enable retrospective postingto a new non-
    leading ledger?
    SAP offers a service called SAP General Ledger Migration. For detail please see
    chapter u201CMiscellaneousu201D.
    More Information regarding u201CSAP General Ledger Migrationu201Dcan be accessed
    using the quick link u2018GLMIGu2019on the SAP Service Marketplace (
    http://service.sap.com/GLMIG). Please also see OSS-note 812919
    with kind regards
    Cora

  • Tax Date Based Non Leading Ledger BS, TB and PnL

    Hi Gurus
    In our scenario, we will be using the Leading Ledger for Accrual Accounting, while the Non Leading Ledger will be used for Cash Accounting. It is required, for management effectiveness to capture transactions on accrual basis (leading ledger), but as far as tax reporting is concerned, it will be on cash basis (non leading ledger).
    Scenario is:
    Vendor Invoice comes on Jul 1, 2009 with terms of payment as say 45 days. The due date is mid August. In accrual (Leading Ledger) accounting, we will book the invoice on Jul 1, 2009 (posting date) with 45 days credit period, and due date as Aug 14, 2009. Now, as per cash accounting (Non Leading Ledger) we should only book this invoice on Aug 14, 2009,when the cash outflow will take place. However, since in New GL posting automatically happens for Leading and Non Leading ledgers, the NL document also will have the same posting date as LL document (Jul 1, 2009). The TDS/ Service Tax etc. however will be deducted only on payment, in August, which is a different fiscal period (as well as different tax reporting period).
    My question is, is there a way to use TAX DATE or some other date field for Non Leading Ledger, and have the tax reports generated on that basis? Mind you, the purpose of cash accounting is for statutory and tax purposes. So we need to be able to draw financial statements based on cash accounting.
    Would greately apprecaite if any of you can help me guide to a possible solution. I have the following options:
    1 - Create a report that will use (somehow) a logic to capture the transactions based on tax date
    2 - Find a User Exit to capture the actual cash flow date and use it to generate the tax/ statutory reports
    3 - Use Tax Date field to store the cash flow date and use it to generate the tax/ statutory reports
    Any suggestions welcome!
    Regards
    Mandar

    Hi,
    using different ledgers for parallel accounting ( eg IFRS, US-GAAP, Indian-GAAP...) is not a matter of tax procedure assigned to a country and company code(s) assigned to a country.
    The tax law for a country/tax jurisdiction code does not depend on which reporting standard you use (IFRS, US-GAAP, Indian-GAAP...).
    Best regards, Christian

  • Difference in ABST2 in non leading ledger for 2nd LC AA and 2nd LC GL

    Hi,
    While executing ABST2 there is difference in our non leading ledger ,we have recently created new dep. area 33 which updates the values in 2nd LC AA for non leading ledger but value in  2nd LC GL is different from what we have in Asset for non leading ledger Z1 .
    When we check in FAGLL03 for Z1 ledger  we came to know that Asset balance is updated from Local currency and GL values are updated from 2nd Local currency ,but in 2nd Local currency system has not post any entry and due to this there is difference.
    We want the same value in non leading ledger Z1 for 2nd LC AA and 2nd LC GL.
    Please let me know if there is any specefic settings required for the same.
    We have mantain dep area 34 also as per SAP Note 1433535 but still there is difference in ABST2.
    Thanks
    Akshata

    Hello Akshata,
    If you want to setup a scenario in Fixed Asset Accounting, where
    you post different valuations (local GAAP / IFRS) to a different ledger
    group in G/L for parallel valuation, then you have to use (in total) 3
    depreciation areas in the following way. For each additional "valuation"
    for which you have additional ledgers defined in G/L, and for which you
    want to get different values as those posted in area 01, you need also
    two additional depreciation areas (1 real and and 1 derived area) in
    asset accounting.
    Please consider a correct definition of a parallel ledger scenario
    is as follow: this is an example only
                               Posting to G/L         Ledger
    Area 01 HGB                        1                   0L    > STATUTORY
    Area XX IAS                          3                   LG    > (IAS)
    Area YY (IAS - HGB)             5 or 6              LG    > (IAS)
    Acquisition/transf/retirement postings in area 01 go to all ledgers
    independently of your setting in OADB. And, if any difference occurs
    between area 01 an area XX this is posted trough the derived area YY
    (posting indicator 6).
    This is the parallel ledger scenario logic and how the techinal
    solution to this requirement was developped.
    You can find more documentation about the so-called "Ledger Scenario" in
    Asset Accounting for the purpose of parallel valuation in the SAP Help
    Portal. You may find these links helpful:
    a) Parallel Accounting in Asset Accounting
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/91/09f5400e517e7fe1000000
    0a1550b0/content.htm
    b) Parallel Valuation
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/4f/71ea61448011d189f000
    00e81ddfac/content.htm
    c) Making Settings for Parallel Ledgers in FI-AA
         > this one documents my above explanation
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/0d/de3d83c78b48a28a44ad92
    14239d57/content.htm
    d) Example: Parallel Accounting and the Derived Depreciation Area
         > this one describes how the derived area acts in the scenario
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/37/ebad814b3347e9bc5182c0
    56d5bbd8/content.htm
    kind regards
    Ray

  • Balance Carryforward - Non-Leading Ledger

    Hello SAP'ers,
    We have 2 ledgers, 1 leading of course with a Fiscal Year of June to May, and one non-leading ledger with a fiscal year of April to March.  I can't find any documentation on when to run the balance carryforward program for the non-leading ledger.  We have started FY2009 for our non-leading on April 1/  Do  I run FAGLGVTR - Balance Carryforward (New), for the non-leading ledger only?  I know in June I will run it for the leading.  SAPs info is fuzzy regarding the non-leading carryforward process.
    Thanks for your help.
    JIm

    Hello,
    I am not sure if I understand quesition correct.
    1. Internal order per ledger - this link might give you some information.
    FB50L FI-posting to an internal order
    You can report internal orders per cost element (acutal and plan)
    Use reports in: SAP Menue/ Information Systems/Accounting/Controlling/Reports for Internal Orders/Summarization Reports or/and More Reports
    as an instance: S_ALR_87013010
    direct output to Excel and drill down functionality for details.
    2. GL balances per ledger: use F.08 and select ledger, then you have report per ledger
    Let me know if this is what you have expected.
    all the best Erwin

  • Creating depreciation area for non leading ledger

    Hi,
    I want to configurate a depreciation area for a non-leading ledger. This is my scenario:
    01-Accounting area leading ledger. Group legder: 0L (on line)
    02- Accounintg area non leading ledger. Group ledger N1 (Area posts APC only directly)
    03-Depreciation non leading ledger. Grouo ledger N1 (Area posts depreciation only)
    Is it correct to created this 2 areas for non leading ledger?
    Thanks,
    Cecilia

    Hi Cecilia,
    additionally to my colleagues:
    For each additional set of accounting principles, you create one real  and one derived depreciation area.                                                                               
    Real Depreciation Area:                                                                               
    1. In Customizing for Financial Accounting (New), choose Asset Accounting  - Valuation  - Depreciation Areas  -Define Depreciation  Areas.                                                                               
    2.  Assign both depreciation areas to the same ledger group.                                                                               
    The ledger group you assign them to is not allowed to contain the leading ledger.                                                                               
    3.  In the Posting in G/L field, choose Area Posts Depreciation Only.                                                                               
    Derived Depreciation Area:                                                                               
    It is easiest to create the derived depreciation area using the Wizard.                                                                               
    4. In Customizing for Financial Accounting (New), choose Asset Accounting - Valuation - Depreciation Areas - Set Up Areas for Parallel Valuation.                                                                               
    5. In the Posting in G/L field, choose Area Posts APC Only.  Specify that this derived depreciation area represents the difference between the real depreciation area for parallel accounting and the        
    master depreciation area.                                                                               
    You do not have to set up a separate account set for these new depreciation areas. Instead you use the account set of the master depreciation area. In this scenario, you do not have to create any new  accounts in the chart of accounts or in the company code. You also do  not have to create a new financial statement version.                                                                               
    So a typical dep.area setting for a parallel ledger at you is like: 
    T093
    AFABER ABVOR1 AFABE1 ABVOR2 AFABE2 BUHBKT LDGRP_GL
    01...............................00...........................00............1.............0L
    02...............................00...........................00............3.............N1
    03..................+...........01............ - ............02............6.............N1
    Regards Bernhard

  • Retrospective Posting in Non-Leading Ledger

    Hi there,
    Please advise if it is possible to update the previous transactions in the non-ledaing ledger, which will be activated later; after the leading ledger has been gone live for few months.
    How can this be done?
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    at the moment it is not posible to fulfill the scenario that you decribed. In my opinion it does not mak sense to active a non leading ledger some month later then the leading ledger. To have more than one ledger means that we are talking about parallel accounting and therfore all the ledgers have to be implemented at the same time
    Kind regards
    Thomas

Maybe you are looking for