Parking & Posting of Vendor Invocies against PO

Hi Guys,
I have a requirement wherein
1. An outsourcing (people) team will park all invoices recevied from vendors against the Purchase Order mentioned on the invoice.
2. Company A/c payable team will only post the "parked invoice".
Each invoice will be parked first and then posted. No document should be posted directly.
The A/c payable team should not be able to do any changes in "parked document". He will just Post the document of cancel/reject the parked document.
SO, I will give "parking" authorisation to outsourcing team & "posting" authorisation to A/c payable team. Two different authorisations. Parking person should not be able to Post & Posting person should not be able to Park.
How should I go about this?
In MIR7 - I can, park & post the invoice.
In MIRO - I can directly post the document.
regards,
Anand

Hi,
My requirement is
1. Each invoice will be parked first and then posted. No document should be posted directly.
2. Parking person should not be able to post the document.
3. Posting person should not be able to park the document.
MIRO - will post the document directly. That means if I give this Tcode then a person can directly post the document without parking. Hence can not use MIRO.
MIR7 - will park the document. But with this transaction, i can also post the parked document. Hence I can not use MIR7 for parking document.
Can I deactivate the posting of parked document in MIR7? If this is possible, my problem will be half solved.
Need urgent help.
regards,
Anand.

Similar Messages

  • Post a good issue against an outbound delivery with movement type 601 K

    Hello,
    according to my business scenario I need to manage the stock of different vendors into the client's location (plant) at storage location level and I need to post the good issue against an outbound delivery to decrease the stock level.
    Since the owner of the goods isn't my client the item is managed only at quantity level (not value) so I'm not interesed in the accounting document.
    To do it I'm using the functionality related to the vendor consignment stock but I'm not able to post the good issue against an outbound delivery using the movemement type 601 and the special stock indicator equal to K.
    In particular I've tried in two different ways:
    - setup the consignment stock indicator (= K) into the sales item category, but when I post the goods issue the system is not able to find out the right vendor
    - to create a stock determination rule instead of the setting previous described, but the system display an error message (Fld selectn for mvmt type 601 / acct L534200770 differs for Cost center (010) ) even if the accouting is not relevant in my scenario
    Can you suggest me how the system has to be setup in order to cover my requirements?
    Thanks in advance,
    Alessandro

    Hi,
    Please clarrify which material type you are using in this scenario? I suggest you to use material type UNBW (no value updation will be there) and create a material master.  Use special stock indicator K. Proceed with 601K to do GI. Hope it works. Thanking you.

  • Vendor outstanding against Purchase order

    Hi Gurus,
                      Is there any standard report in SAP where we can get vendor outstanding against purchase order . (Purchase order made,miro also made , but payment is still due ). How can we find or track the pending payment of vendor against which purchase order.

    Hi
    No standard report displays your requirement.
    Prepare a Functional Specification(FS) as per your requirement and tell your ABAP Guy to prepare a Customized Report.
    Regards
    Venkat

  • Posting multiple goods issues against the same delivery

    Hello gurus,
    We are a fashion apparel company using ECC 6.0 and would like to know if it is possible to post mutliple goods issues against the same delivery?
    I will explain the business requirement.
    - We create a stock transport order to deliver 400 units of merchandise to on or our retail stores (STO is created and processed to a delivery).
    - This information is passed down to our warehouse management system (which is not SAP)
    - Our warehouse management system has the ability to split a delivery into multiple shipment when needed.  For example, our warehouse may only be able to complete 250 units for our morning shipment and will therefore pick, pack and post this.  This will feed back into SAP and process a 641 movement so that the units now show as "in transit".  This is needed so that our stores can process the ASN and move the units into their inventory when they receive the merchandise later that day.
    - During the afternoon, our warehouse will process the remaining 150 units and will ship this to our store later in the evening or next day.
    Currently, we are not able to process another goods issue against a delivery as we close out the delivery during the first goods issue.  We would prefer not to have to generate a new delivery for our DC and let them continue to process against the same delivery, but we are unsure how to configure this.
    Any help or guideance would be extremely appreciated
    Thanks in advance

    Hi RJ,
    First of all sorry to write such a lengthy reply,In one line if i want to summerize then it is not possible with standard SAP however we can achieve this by writing some piece of code in both the system
    AS - IS
                   Business process
              From business process point of view you are right that once the pick & pack is in process it is not advisable to create a new delivery document for balance quantity and share the same with WMS as then they have to create a new document in WMS and start picking based on that rather then the old delivery document number. if i am in your position then i can give a thought like this
    e.g.
    Delivery                                                  - 100 Unit
    Shipment confirmation from WMS            -   60 Unit
    Change in delievry quanity / Pick qty        -   60 Unit
    Invoice from SAP                                    -   60 Unit
    Second confirmation from WMS                          -   40  Unit
    Change in the existing delivery quantity                -   Now here we have two option either
    1) Change the delivery quantity / Pick qty  to (60+40) =100 or
    2) Remove the 60 and update 40 as delivery and pick quantity
    Pros & Cons
    if you will select option 1 then furhter invoice will happen for 100 unit which is incorrect as physically you are shipping only 40 unit
    if you are selecting option 2 then the document flow is incorrect as you don't have history(in SAP) for the 60 unit which was shipped earlier
    Solution ::
    so in my opinion the best option is to create a seperate delivery document (store the old delviery number in one of the field of the new delivery and pass the same to custom segment of the IDoc) transmit the IDoc to WMS write the validation logic in WMS
    Find the record with old deliver number in the WMS system, check the status whether it is active or inactive
    if it is acitive Validate the Material + qty with the WMS record(Material + balance quantity) if both are same then pass the new deliery number to custom field of the WMS table
    At the time of confirming back to the SAP, Write a piece of code in SAP that if the incoming idoc custom field(new delivery number) field is populated then ignore the orignal document number and post the document using the new delivery document number
    Hope this help

  • Error while doing Return to vendor (122) against PO through QA11

    While doing Return to vendor (122) against Purchase Order through QA11 we are getting the error as Deficit of PU GR quantity 20,000.000 TH: RPO1010 FCHN 007A.
    Steps we are followed.
    1. Created Purchase for Quantity 20 TH with activation of Unlimited Delivery.(TH Means UOM (Thousand)
    2. GR has taken for 20,000 TH instead of 20 TH because of Unlimited Delivery as activated.
    3. Usage decision as given total Quantity accepted based On Inspection Lot generated at MIGO.
    4. Stock has come to Un-Restricted.
    5. For Short fall of  Purchase Order Quantity Increased the PO qty to 20,020.
    6. For Return to vendor we transfer the stock from Un-restricted to Quality by MB1B Mvt type 322.
    7. While Transfer Inspection Lot has generated.
    8. Based on that Inspection Lot we try to do return to vendor through QA11 against the same Purchase Order.
    While doing the Last step we are getting the above error.
    Pls. Kindly look into this and tell me whether this steps are correct, if correct any settings needs to be done to over come the error or tell the Correct Logic to return the Material.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sathish
    Ph:9940518715

    My thoughts on this is that the original PO was for 20TH.  therefore you will only be able to return 20TH against it regardless of what you receipted.  This is because SAP copies from the original PO document for the return and not the GR material document.
    You can try to edit the original PO and increase the amount to 20,020 and try again.  But I don't think you'll be able to edit that since it was fully receipted.
    Your probably going to have to do a return for 20TH and then a separate, stand-alone return for 20,000 TH.
    Craig

  • Issue in Posting of Vendor Invoice

    Hi
    I am having an issue in posting of vendor invoice. In simulation mode, the system is showing the correct calculation of TDS amounts. but when I am trying to post the Invoice , the TDS entries created by the system are deleted and system gives:
    Error Message - The excise year could not be determined for generating the numbers for TDS certificates. The number range is linked to the Excise Year and not on the financial year directly.
    Procedure - Check the customising done for the company code in the India version IMG. Maintain the start month for the excise year correctly.
    There is no error for other company codes in the system and this happens for only one company code.
    Under the India version for extended with holding tax , we have maintained the withholding tax number group and SAP Script forms , assigned number range to number groups and maintained number ranges for the company code.
    Pls suggest
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari
    TDS Certificates. The number ra
    on the financial year directly

    Hi,
    Just check if in the Withholding tax Type configuration - The Withholding tax certificate check box is checked. Just read the help for what is the implication of ticking that checkbox. This may be the problem.
    Cheers
    V.Krishnan
    (assign points if useful)

  • Transfer Posting from Vendor Ledger to Customer Ledger

    Dear Experts,
    We are in to service industry, most of our customers are also having vendor codes, we used to give some commission to them the is posted to vendor codes due to TDS posting, on periodical basis, the same needs to adjust with outstanding in customer accounts.
    For this our users are processing through individual posting for each customer through F-04, as volume is very high and it is consuming lot of time to complete this activity. Is there any standard process available in SAP, so that we can process all the transfer postings from vendor ledgers to customer ledger in a single process on periodical basis.
    Thanks & Regards
    Madhava Raj

    Hello Raj,
    You can use BDC as stated by Mani.
    BDC - POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING
    Please check this link for more information related to this BDC.
    http://scn.sap.com/message/3770202\
    I hope it helps else revert us for any issues.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Lakshmi S

  • Bapi for Posting the vendor payment.F-53

    Hi,
    I need to post a document for Vendor payment using BAPI, by providing the Vendor Invoice number as Reference number which was created by using the FM PRELIMINARY_POSTING_FB01. I can able to generate a Vendor invoice, But i cant able to make this vendor invoice number as a reference number to post the vendor payment using the BAPI BAPI_ACC_DOUMENT_POST. After Executing this BAPI ,then i check in FBL1N means, the posted document was in open items. It Should be in cleared items. If i manually entered through F-53 means the payment is coming successfully and also as Cleared items in FBL1N.How to solve this issue..
    Regards
    Bala.

    Hi Bala,
    Can you please share your BDC code with me for clearing vendor invoice.
    Regards
    Neeraj Sharma

  • Park Post option in F-48 & F-53

    Hi
    My client has requirement in Payments (F-53) & Downpayments (F-48) that entry must be entered by someone else & it must be posted by someone else after verification.
    There is park & post option in FB60, FB70, etc. But there is not such parking & posting option in Payments (F-53) & Downpayments (F-48).
    Now, Cleint has one requirement regarding payment & down payments. They want parking & posting option in F-53 & F-48.
    SAP doesnot provide for parking & posting option for F-48 & F-53.
    This control is generally required by many people. So tell me how to fulfill cleint requirement.

    Hi Deepak
    In my company this is done through Workflow. Once a user post a document via F-48 or F-53 in will sits in the appropriete approver's sap inbox. Then approver will check the document and post it.
    For example;
    If the amount is less then 50000 it will routed to MR. A 
    If the amount is form  50000 to 100000  it will routed to MR. B and so on.
    Or, you also can ask your abaper to create a new user exit (customized screen) for you? 
    Thanks
    Krish

  • Definition of  parked status in vendor line item display

    Hi All,
    What is the definition of parked status in vendor line item display?
    Thanks
    Pauline

    Hi,
    1.Please check the WHT config has been done properly.
    2.Check the vendor master and varify tax fields are filled up.
    Regards

  • Std Work flow for Invoice Parking & posting

    I am working om std SAP workflow for invoice document parking :
    I have done the following activities :
    1. Activate Work flow Template for Document Completion
    Here i activated the event "Complete the Parked Log. IV Document"--> Incoming Invoice Document Parked. It is showing a green traffic light .
    In agent assignment
    Complete the Parked Log. IV Document>Complete the Parked Log. IV Document>Complete the Parked Invoice--> i have assigned the user MMCONFIG
    2. In Define Release Criteria i have the following settings :
    1000 H Credit 0.01 INR US MMCONFIG
    1000 S Debit 0.01 INR US MMCONFIG
    3. In Activate Workflow Template for Release for Posting
    Here i activated the event Incoming Invoice Complete: ReleaseRel & i m getting a green traffic light .
    In assign agents i did the following
    Release the Completed Log. IV Document>Release the Completed Log. IV Document>Release the Completed Log. IV Document i assigned the user MMCONFIG
    In Invoice Parking: Approve Release i assigned the user MMCONFIG .
    For Invoice Parking: Release Invoice
    Invoice Parking: Posting an Invoice " I AM NOT ABLE TO ASSIGN ANY USER AS THESE ARE BACKGROUND TASKS ".
    Now when do a MIR7 - Park invoice & save the invoice as complete i am getting a mail in the mail box of MMCONFIG saying :
    "Invoice Release 5105xxxxxxx 2009, Completed by MMCONFIG "
    I go & release the same invoice .
    Then i executed MIRO & tried posting the released invoice . The sysem doesnt allow me 2 post the invoice .
    It automatically goes to MIR4 transaction & forces me to save as complete
    if i try to post it the system says "Parked document is release-relevant and cannot be posted"
    Pls tell me how can I post the invoice & IF MY SETTINGS FOR THE WORKFLOW IS OK ???
    Regards
    Anis

    Firstly,  check with the Binding of the event and workflow, if they are fine
    then check if the workflow gets triggered when you are posting... to check this,
    First go to transaction SWU8 - turn on the workflow trace and then
    Proceed with posting the invoice
    go to transaction SWU8 again and then turn off the workflow trace
    go to SWU9 - to check which all workflows got triggered....
    If there is any workitem in your workflow, then go to SWI1 and select the workitem of that workflow and press shift+F8 to check the status of it and also check to which all agents it had sent...
    If possible just give a hardcoded value in the workitem for testing purpose and check if that goes properly, later on implement the rule.....
    If the workflow does not triggere - go to transaction SWETYPV and deactivate and activate the event linkage with that workflow....
    Regards,

  • Vendor Code against Vendor Name

    Dear All,
    Is there any standar report or any other way by using we can find Vendor Code against Vendor description,,
    Pl note we are having 960 vendor descriptions and we want to find vendor code against each..
    We want to avoid indivisual search for vendor
    Pl help

    hi,
    You can't find them all at once...
    but in the other way you can make a search using the single table...
    Do execute the table LFA1...w/o putting any entry...
    And then inside the table you'll find the description with the codes  to search..
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Park post option required in FBS1

    Hi
    My client is using FBS1 for accrual & defferals. In FBS1, i want that entry should be entered & parked by one user and the same must be approved by his senior.
    After i entered all the details in both the line items, i went to document tab. There i was able to see park / hold option. But it was greyed out. Only simulate and post option were open to select.
    Let me know how to bring this park & post option in FBS1.

    Hi,
    It is a system design that for 'Park' or 'Hold' are not available(greyed out ) for accrual documents (FBS1). The reason of this is because an accrual document requires a reversal date and a held document cannot handle a reversal posting.
    For further information on this function, kindly go through note 492006 where it indicates that : -
    'Special transactions such as FBB1, FBS1, FB41 cannot and must not be parked since subsequent processing using FBV0 is not possible.'
    so if you are using this change may be you will face some issue while posting through FBV0.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • MIR7 Parking & posting error

    Dear Sapguru,
    We had recently implemented MM-FI module. Invoice is parked/post through transaction code MIR7/MIR6. We have applied the user exit for maker checker validation while parking and posting the document. So the person who will park the document will not able to post the same. The user exist was working fine in production up till now.
    Yesterday,on PROD system maker was able to park & post the document. while doing the same he has followed the below process :
    Parked the invoice through t code - MIR7
    Changed parked document through - FBV4 (Only posting date changed)
    While changing parked document, he was able to post the same.
    We are also able to produce the same case only once in the quality system
    Kindly suggest if any standard validation is availabe for the same.
    Thanks & regards
    Varsha Patil

    Hi,
    check if the user in question had permission for  AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_RECH_WRK'.
    Have a look at this thread:
    MIR7 posting issue
    Best regards.
    Edited by: Pablo Casamayor on Dec 21, 2011 3:08 PM

  • PARK & POST BILLING DOCUMENT FOR CUSTOMER.

    Hello Gurus,
    I am asked to set a Park & Post option for Billing Document for Customer i.e. outgoing invoice to customer.
    how can i do this??
    Kindly guide.
    Regards
    Swati Bhatt

    Hello
    Park & Post Billing Document
    This functionality is available in MM/FI.
    You can use Billing Block functionality in Billing Doc type (Tcode VOFA) by activating Posting Block indicator.
    To release them to accounting, either you can individually or you can use VFX3 for collective release of billing doc to accounting.
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

Maybe you are looking for