Partial Capacity consuption in capacity view - Table 1

Hi all,
When I see the capacity consumption for a particular product in capacity view, Table 1; it is exactly half the quantity of the pur. req. that is generated. The pur. req. quantity for this product is correct in capacity view, Table 2. The resource is a transportation resource.
This is happening for one particular product. Is this some master data problem?
Regards,
Biplab

hi
Check the UOM and Conversion for Weight/volume/base unit etc.as detailed in the SAP note:722706
I would suggest you to check the guideline in SAP Note:722706..
Thanks and Regards
Suresh

Similar Messages

How is Reqmts calculated in CM01( capacity Planning: Detailed Capacity List.

I believe Reqmts is the difference between the 'To be confirmed' and 'confirmed hours'.
If let suppose standard hours for a part to be manufacture is 100hrs and we have already work 52 hrs off 100hrs then if i go and look up this order in CM01 then the Reqmts should say 48hr (100-52).
But when I am going to CM01 it still saying 100 hours which is not correct. Can some one help me solve this issue

Hi Pankaj,
Once confirmation is done, hours must be deducted and it should show the remaining hours in CM01 based on the below settings in work center/resource in Capacity tab.
Control: Calc. of Remaining Req./Duration After Confirmation
Controls how, after partial confirmations the
Remaining capacity requirement and
Remaining duration in a rescheduling is calculated.
The following are possible:
     Formula-Related: The remaining requirement / remaining duration of a
     partially confirmed operation is determined when the formula defined in the work
     center is evaluated. It is the remaining quantity and not the operation quantity
     that is taken into account after the confirmation.
     Completely for Partial Confirmation: The remaining requirement /
     remaining duration is reduced completely when there is a partial
     confirmation.
     Completely for Final Confirmation: The remaining requirement /
     remaining duration is reduced completely when there is a final confirmation.
     There is no adjustment through partial confirmations.
     Proportional to Service: The remaining requirement / remaining
     duration of a partially-confirmed operation is reduced proportional to the
     service that is assigned to the relevant capacity segment in the work center in
     your record type group.
Dependencies
When there is a final confirmation the remaining capacity requirement of the
operation is always completely reduced.
Please check your settings accordingly.
Thanks.

Creating a Maintenance View Table on SE11

Hi, Experts. I want to create a Maintenance View Table on SE11 (View option on SE11 and then selecting Maintenance view from the View Type List). Is there anyone who have a document that will be able to help me create this table or pointers that will help me.
Thanks for your help.
Regards

hi,
steps are
Goto SE 11.
Choose the radio button of Views, give the view name and create.
Enter the short description and table names for which u want to create view.
Select the 2nd table-name field and click on relationship button.
Then goto view fields tab.
Select the table name and the fields u want to display.
Save and activate.
please see this
steps to create a view

Reg Capacity used and capacity available

Dear all,
How can I see the capacity available and capacity used for a particular resource for previous month , is there any standard report available in standard SAP.
Regards
madhav

Try transaction MCP7

MVC: Create a view which populates two (or more) joined tables in a single view table

I am beginner in MVC and I would like to create a view which populates two (or more) joined tables in a single view table as described below.
I have two tables:
1 - Bloggers: - bloggerID (int);
                    - bloggerName (string)
2 - Blogs: - blogID (int);
bloggerID (int);
                - blogTitle (string);
                - blogImage (string)
A blogger can have one or more blogs while one blog must be related to only one blogger.
I would like to have a view table on my webpage as the following:
Blogger Name
Blog Title
Blog Image
Noris Gang
Virus
virus.jpg
Noris Gang
Desktops
desktop.jpg
Gauthier
Books
books.png
John Leon
NNNMHJhjdhj
Nmbj.jpg
I'm using MVC 4 (or at least 3).
Thanks for your help.

Hello,
From your description, it is not very clear that what you mean about the View, if it means the View concept in database as SQL Server, your required view should be as below:
Create view
as
Select Bloggers.bloggerName, Bloggers.blogTitle, Bloggers.blogImage
From Bloggers join Blogs on Bloggers.bloggerID = Blogs. bloggerID
If it means the UI view in MVC concept, I suggest you could ask it on the MVC forum:
http://forums.asp.net/1146.aspx
Regards.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

How to edit data from a "View Table"?

I am importing data from a "table view" where in sql it joins several tables into one view. When I passed it in using the template it doesnt have the "Edit command column" like other direct link tables. Is there anyway I could make a view table editable? Can I manually try to do it or I have to edit the individual ables? thanks

oh sorry about that.The "template" I mean in HTMLDB when I start building a new application I used "Based on existing tables" method and with single tables it generates everything fine with search fields and edit column to the left. I have a table view that combines about 4 tables together and I used the same template (Based on existing tables) and it has the search and create but it doesnt have the "edit" column on the left. Is there a way I can edit the view table's information so that the other tables that the view combines will be updated/edited?
The reason is that lets say I dont know this person's ID number but I know his name. I search for his name on table A and it returns some general data including his ID number. Instead of going to another Table B with the person's ID number and edit that table I really want to see the information just from one search (Table A)- if a global search can be implemented that would be great too. Thanks Sergio.

Error in creating Transport Request for a view table

Hello all,
I have an ECC IDES 6.0 system named EC1 and another one which is ECC EhP4 IDES named EA1 which I have just installed.
One of my requesters has a view table named ZVAITM_TBLE in EC1 and she wants it to be transported to EA1.
So I created a workbench transport in SE10 and included the following:
PgmID = R3TR
Obj = VDAT
Object name = ZVAITM_TBLE
But when I press enter, I encountered the following error:
No object definition exists for Customizing object ZVAITM_TBLE
Message no. TK427
Diagnosis
The Customizing object R3TR VDAT ZVAITM_TBLE is not defined in the tables of the Change and Transport System.
This means that you cannot use the Transport Organizer to edit it.
System Response
The function terminates.
Procedure
First check whether the name of the object is correct. Then you (or the system administrator) should check the object definition, to ensure that the object was created correctly (transaction SOBJ).
If the object does not exist, then create it or delete it from the request/task.
I am new to transports so I have no idea how to proceed.
Please advise.
Thanks a lot!
Cha Cha

Hello Cha,
Kindly open this custom table using SM30 and try creating a transport request from there.
Regards
Vivek

Unable to view table list in sql developer

I am able to connect to the database through sql developer but unable to view tables list.
Select query is displaying the contents though.
Any Help ???

Using SQL Developer, I log in using the owner user id and password. I can see all but one of my materialized views. It was definitely created by the user id I'm logged in as. A query of user_objects in sql+ shows all MVs, including the one that's missing in SQL Developer. If I log in using the same credentials in TOAD, the MV is displayed in the current schema, as I'd expect. The super weird thing is that if I use the previous version of SQL Developer, I see that MV! Any thoughts?
Edited by: [email protected] on Feb 25, 2009 9:19 AM

Business user needs to view tables with out SE16 access

Hi ,
There is a requirement where business user ( Data team)    need to view some master and transactional data tables in production . But , as per our process , end users will not be given SE16 access .
Is there any solution where we can allow the end user to view tables with out SE16 access ?
Thanks in advance .
Thanks .
Dharma.

Hi,
Using Function Module C160_TRANSACTION_CALL you can call any tcode which dont have access..
Create a report and call function module and pass se16 to parameter .
CALL FUNCTION 'C160_TRANSACTION_CALL' "
EXPORTING
    i_tcode =        'SE16'            " sy-tcode
EXCEPTIONS
    ILLEGAL_INPUT = 1           "
    INTERNAL_ERROR = 2          "
    . " C160_TRANSACTION_CALL
now create a tcode for this report as ZSE16.,
hope this helps u.,
You can also create Data browser ( SE16 ) in report and display as ALV., using Field Symbols and RTTS.
Thanks & Regards,
Kiran

Using View Tables in SQ01 and SQ02, getting 'Not Authorized to Read Table'

We are trying to use a SAP Standard View Table (CAUFV) in an SQ01 and SQ02 transaction. Even though there is no Authorization Group assigned to the View we still get "You have no authorization to read table caufv' when running the linked transaction. We tried assigning the CA and KA authorization groups to the role and got the same results. (The tables used to create the View are AFKO and AUKF and thier Authorization groups are CA and KA.) We tried other views and received the same results. Does anyone have any experience with this?

Hello Chuck,
There are 2 ways to restrict this
1: The user should be a part of at least one user group to run the corresponding ABAP query. This automatically restricts the access of the user to specific functional areas, and thus the corresponding underlying logical databases.
2: The authorization object S_QUERY should be used to give proper authorizations to the user for a query. This authorization object has a field named ACTVT, which can take values 02 for Change, 23 for Maintain and 67 for Translate.
This value determines whether the user can create and modify the query. The possible authorizations in the object are as follows:
S_QUERY_ALL Change, maintain and translate query
S_QUERY_UPD Change and Translate

Create View table with multiple table

I want to create View table with relation with multiple tables.
for ex
table 1
mrnno
mrnqty
table 2
mrnno
issqty
table 3
mrnno
retqty
want to create view table where i can see the sum (mrnqty), sum(issqty),sum(retqty) group by mrnno
sandy

Hi
CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW my_view AS
WITH t1 AS
(SELECT mrnno,
                  SUM(mrnqty) sum1
FROM table_1
GROUP BY mrnno),
t2 AS
(SELECT mrnno,
                  SUM(issqty) sum2
FROM table_2
GROUP BY mrnno),
t3AS
(SELECT mrnno,
                  SUM(retqty) sum3
FROM table_3
GROUP BY mrnno)
SELECT mrnno,
                sum1,
               sum2,
               sum3
FROM t1,t2,t3
WHERE t1.mrnno = t2.mrnno
AND       t1.mrnno = t3.mrnnoCheers
Ben
http://www.munkyben.wordpress.com
Don't forget to mark replies helpful or correct ;)

Which views/tables to use for retrieving item information

Hi All,
I need to write a PL/SQL procedure for retrieving detailed information for a specified item (given inventory item ID and organization ID). I'm not quite sure which views/tables to us for this.
I found out that view MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_FVL is the underlying view for the Master Item Form (via help / record history menu option). But when looking up in eTRM following warning is described:
Warning: Oracle does not recommend you query or alter data using this view. It may change dramatically in subsequent minor or major releases.
The second view I found is MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_VL. But when quering for data in this view, it turned out that the view is empty.
Can anybody tell me for what purposes this view is used?
Is it the correct way to use one of these views (or any other?) for retrieving detailed item information or should I better define a new query within the procedure using tables such as MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B, MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_TL and MTL_PARAMETERS (any others) ?
Any ideas for that?
Best Regards,
Carolin

Hi Carolin,
It's usually more efficient to use base tables instead of views. The tables you will actually need will depend on your requirements. Regarding your question about MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_VL, it's usually ok to use the _VL views. These typically contain the same information as the base tables plus some logic to get the appropriate translations for fields that can be shown in different languages (for instance, DESCRIPTION). Typical table names you will need could be:
Item Master: MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B
Organizations: MTL_PARAMETERS
Subinventories: MTL_SECONDARY_INVENTORIES
Units of Measure: MTL_UNITS_OF_MEASURE
Onhand Quantity: MTL_ONHAND_QUANTITIES_DETAIL
Material Transactions: MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS
Categories: MTL_CATEGORIES_B, MTL_CATEGORY_SETS_B, MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES
If your query didn't return any data, it's probably because the language was not properly setup in your session (check USERENV ('LANG') so see what's the language in your session).
Hope it helps.

Streams on materialized view table vs. local table

We are in a situation where we temporarily need to implement Streams on several materialized view tables. During development and testing I've noted that a local table with streams implemented on it yields 50% faster performance on apply than the materialized view tables. Can anyone tell me (1) why this is, it doesn't make sense since data is being retrieved from a buffered queue not the tables, and (2) a work around to this to improve performance on the mv tables. Any hellp would be appreciated.

Can't give you an answer why. I would suggest that you try (1) creating the materialzed views on prebuilt tables and (2) add parallelism to the apply process(es)

Updating XML thru view table

Given the following view table that i created
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW PO_DETAIL_VIEW ( PAYLOADID,
ORDERNUMBER, LINENUMBER, SHIPPEDITEMQTY, COST,
ORDEREDITEMQTY, ACTION, UOM, DESCRIPTION,
SKU, STATUS, CURRENCY, PLANNEDRECEIPTDATETIME
) AS select extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/MessageHeader/@payloadId'),
          extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/Order/@orderNumber'),
          extractvalue(value(i),'/OrderLine/@lineNumber'),
extractvalue(value(i),'/OrderLine/@shippedItemQty'),
extractvalue(value(i),'/OrderLine/@cost'),
extractvalue(value(i),'/OrderLine/@orderedItemQty'),
extractvalue(value(i),'/OrderLine/@action'),
extractvalue(value(i),'/OrderLine/@uom'),
extractvalue(value(i),'/OrderLine/@description'),
          extractvalue(value(i),'/OrderLine/@sku'),
          extractvalue(value(i),'/OrderLine/@status'),
          extractvalue(value(i),'/OrderLine/@currency'),
          extractvalue(value(i),'/OrderLine/@plannedReceiptDateTime')
from PURCHASEORDER p, table(xmlsequence(extract(value(p),'/OrderMessage/Order/OrderLine'))) i
when i executed the following command:
UPDATE po_detail_view
SET ORDERNUMBER = '500001' where PAYLOADID='1'
I get end of file error which disconnect me from my oracle database.
but when i update my another view table it is fine.
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW PO_MASTER_VIEW ( VERSION,
PAYLOADID, TIMESTAMP, SENDERNAME, SENDERCOMPONENT,
DOCUMENTREFERENCEID, SINGLETRANSACTION, INDEX0, INDEX1,
INDEX2, INDEX3, CLOSED, ORDERNUMBER,
ORDERTYPE, UNIQUEBUSINESSKEY, HANDLINGCODE, BUYERID,
BUYERPARTYNAME, BUYERROLE ) AS select extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/MessageHeader/@version'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/MessageHeader/@payloadId'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/MessageHeader/@timeStamp'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/MessageHeader/@senderName'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/MessageHeader/@senderComponent'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/MessageHeader/@documentReferenceId'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/MessageHeader/@singleTransaction'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/MessageHeader/HeaderIndexedAttribute[1]/@content'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/MessageHeader/HeaderIndexedAttribute[2]/@content'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/MessageHeader/HeaderIndexedAttribute[3]/@content'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/MessageHeader/HeaderIndexedAttribute[4]/@content'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/Order/@closed'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/Order/@orderNumber'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/Order/@orderType'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/Order/@uniqueBusinessKey'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/Order/@handlingCode'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/Order/Buyer/@Id'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/Order/Buyer/@PartyName'),
extractValue(value(p),'/OrderMessage/Order/Buyer/@Role')
from PURCHASEORDER p
UPDATE po_master_view
SET VERSION = '2.0' where PAYLOADID='1'
i can see that the problem lies with
table(xmlsequence(extract(value(p),'/OrderMessage/Order/OrderLine'))) i
is there any better way or solutions to work ard with it?
Thanks.

Thanks Mark,
That's what i suspected the case, will log the itar later when i am free.
Actually my main issue is that I am using forms 9i to view and edit the view tables that are based on the xml schema. Forms is giving me problem in accessing complicating views.
I think my only solution is to:
1)create a custom table updated by the view table.
2)Create my form block based on custom table.
3)update the xml data using updateXML() from the custom table.

Prvent from the user deleting specific line in view table

HI,
In our Project we have a View Table which user can maintain ,
the user can change or delete the line (and fields) in this table.
what i want is for one line for specific combination in the table to prevent from the user to delete this line ,
so when he push on change mode and mark the line and push on delete i want to give him a error message that he can't delete this line (because the specific combination ).
i new for the concept of the PBO PAI....
so i appreciate any help or suggestions.
Best regards
Micheal A

[Table maintenance Events|http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=4&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sdn.sap.com%2Firj%2Fservlet%2Fprt%2Fportal%2Fprtroot%2Fcom.sap.km.cm.docs%2Flibrary%2Fabap%2FHow%2520to%2520implement%2520Events%2520in%2520Table%2520Maintenance.doc&ei=txFUSdKHKISeNbG1_dQP&usg=AFQjCNF3AI-77PC-MS20vx-ARd4a6zxUfg&sig2=Y_IWbHOsETvyoIrFzPxpCg]
[SAP help|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/91/ca9f0ea9d111d1a5690000e82deaaa/content.htm]

Partial Capacity consuption in capacity view - Table 1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for