Patch 6880880 failed on (12.0.6).
Hi,
We are using EBS r12 (12.0.6) and RDBMS 11g (11.2.x).
I am upgrading the EBS node and following the Metalink doc ID: 752619.1. In this doc I am following doc 454811.1, whic is related to
"Upgrading to the Latest OracleAS 10g 10.1.3.x Patch Set in Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12" and applying patch 8626084.
When I run runinstaller and at the end of this upgradation I have received the following ERROR.
And I am unabler to correct it...
Creating log file "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/.patch_storage/8555288/Apply_8555288_07-23-2010_15-13-38.log"
Starting OPatch Apply session at 07-23-2010_15-13-38.
Command arguments parsed by OPatch are: apply -silent -oh /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3 -invPtrLoc /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oraInst.loc
OPatch version is: 1.0.0.0.61
The contents of the file: /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oraInst.loc
inventory_loc=/d01/clone/SILP14/inst/apps/SILP14_appsdg/admin/oraInventory
inst_group=dba
Performing RAC pre-req. check...
Accessing inventory ... (retry 10 times, delay 30 seconds each time)
System Command: /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/jre/1.4.2/bin/java -Doracle.installer.invPtrLoc=/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oraInst.loc -Dopatch.retry=10 -Dopatch.delay=30 -classpath "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/OraInstaller.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/srvm.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/OPatch/jlib/opatch.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/xmlparserv2.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/share.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/jlib/srvm.jar" opatch/O2O "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3" "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui" opatch.pl 1.0.0.0.61
Result:
output to OPatch:
NODE_LIST=NULL
NODE_COUNT=0
LOCAL_NODE=NULL
IS_CFS=0
RAC_CODE=0
HOME_INDEX=1
This is not a RAC system
Interim Patch ID: 8555288
Checking the patch inventory.
Component Name: oracle.rsf.ssl_rsf
Component Version: 10.1.0.5.0
This is a rolling patch.
[oracle@appsdg SILP14]$ cat /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/.patch_storage/8555288/Apply_8555288_07-23-2010_15-13-38.log
Creating log file "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/.patch_storage/8555288/Apply_8555288_07-23-2010_15-13-38.log"
Starting OPatch Apply session at 07-23-2010_15-13-38.
Command arguments parsed by OPatch are: apply -silent -oh /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3 -invPtrLoc /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oraInst.loc
OPatch version is: 1.0.0.0.61
The contents of the file: /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oraInst.loc
inventory_loc=/d01/clone/SILP14/inst/apps/SILP14_appsdg/admin/oraInventory
inst_group=dba
Performing RAC pre-req. check...
Accessing inventory ... (retry 10 times, delay 30 seconds each time)
System Command: /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/jre/1.4.2/bin/java -Doracle.installer.invPtrLoc=/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oraInst.loc -Dopatch.retry=10 -Dopatch.delay=30 -classpath "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/OraInstaller.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/srvm.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/OPatch/jlib/opatch.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/xmlparserv2.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/share.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/jlib/srvm.jar" opatch/O2O "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3" "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui" opatch.pl 1.0.0.0.61
Result:
output to OPatch:
NODE_LIST=NULL
NODE_COUNT=0
LOCAL_NODE=NULL
IS_CFS=0
RAC_CODE=0
HOME_INDEX=1
This is not a RAC system
Interim Patch ID: 8555288
Checking the patch inventory.
Component Name: oracle.rsf.ssl_rsf
Component Version: 10.1.0.5.0
This is a rolling patch.
Bugs fixed by this patch 8555288:
8555288 : SAVE WALLET FUNCTIONALITY IS SLOW
Reading patch XML files and doing sanity checks.
Read the command to action file map.
Performing initial safety check.
Oracle Configuration Manager (OCM) is included with this release of OPatch.
This is a OCM patch.
EBS environment: no OCM installation and configuration.
To run in silent mode, OPatch requires a response file for Oracle Configuration Manager (OCM).
Run /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/OPatch/ocm/bin/emocmrsp to generate an OCM response file. The generated response file can be reused on different platforms and in multiple OPatch silent installs.
To regenerate an OCM response file, rerun /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/OPatch/ocm/bin/emocmrsp.
##############################
user12007410 wrote:
Hi,
We are using EBS r12 (12.0.6) and RDBMS 11g (11.2.x).
I am upgrading the EBS node and following the Metalink doc ID: 752619.1. In this doc I am following doc 454811.1, whic is related to
"Upgrading to the Latest OracleAS 10g 10.1.3.x Patch Set in Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12" and applying patch 8626084.
When I run runinstaller and at the end of this upgradation I have received the following ERROR.
And I am unabler to correct it...
Creating log file "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/.patch_storage/8555288/Apply_8555288_07-23-2010_15-13-38.log"
Starting OPatch Apply session at 07-23-2010_15-13-38.
Command arguments parsed by OPatch are: apply -silent -oh /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3 -invPtrLoc /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oraInst.loc
OPatch version is: 1.0.0.0.61
The contents of the file: /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oraInst.loc
inventory_loc=/d01/clone/SILP14/inst/apps/SILP14_appsdg/admin/oraInventory
inst_group=dba
Performing RAC pre-req. check...
Accessing inventory ... (retry 10 times, delay 30 seconds each time)
System Command: /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/jre/1.4.2/bin/java -Doracle.installer.invPtrLoc=/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oraInst.loc -Dopatch.retry=10 -Dopatch.delay=30 -classpath "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/OraInstaller.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/srvm.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/OPatch/jlib/opatch.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/xmlparserv2.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/share.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/jlib/srvm.jar" opatch/O2O "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3" "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui" opatch.pl 1.0.0.0.61
Result:
output to OPatch:
NODE_LIST=NULL
NODE_COUNT=0
LOCAL_NODE=NULL
IS_CFS=0
RAC_CODE=0
HOME_INDEX=1
This is not a RAC system
Interim Patch ID: 8555288
Checking the patch inventory.
Component Name: oracle.rsf.ssl_rsf
Component Version: 10.1.0.5.0
This is a rolling patch.
[oracle@appsdg SILP14]$ cat /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/.patch_storage/8555288/Apply_8555288_07-23-2010_15-13-38.log
Creating log file "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/.patch_storage/8555288/Apply_8555288_07-23-2010_15-13-38.log"
Starting OPatch Apply session at 07-23-2010_15-13-38.
Command arguments parsed by OPatch are: apply -silent -oh /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3 -invPtrLoc /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oraInst.loc
OPatch version is: 1.0.0.0.61
The contents of the file: /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oraInst.loc
inventory_loc=/d01/clone/SILP14/inst/apps/SILP14_appsdg/admin/oraInventory
inst_group=dba
Performing RAC pre-req. check...
Accessing inventory ... (retry 10 times, delay 30 seconds each time)
System Command: /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/jre/1.4.2/bin/java -Doracle.installer.invPtrLoc=/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oraInst.loc -Dopatch.retry=10 -Dopatch.delay=30 -classpath "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/OraInstaller.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/srvm.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/OPatch/jlib/opatch.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/xmlparserv2.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui/jlib/share.jar:/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/jlib/srvm.jar" opatch/O2O "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3" "/d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/oui" opatch.pl 1.0.0.0.61
Result:
output to OPatch:
NODE_LIST=NULL
NODE_COUNT=0
LOCAL_NODE=NULL
IS_CFS=0
RAC_CODE=0
HOME_INDEX=1
This is not a RAC system
Interim Patch ID: 8555288
Checking the patch inventory.
Component Name: oracle.rsf.ssl_rsf
Component Version: 10.1.0.5.0
This is a rolling patch.
Bugs fixed by this patch 8555288:
8555288 : SAVE WALLET FUNCTIONALITY IS SLOW
Reading patch XML files and doing sanity checks.
Read the command to action file map.
Performing initial safety check.
Oracle Configuration Manager (OCM) is included with this release of OPatch.
This is a OCM patch.
EBS environment: no OCM installation and configuration.
To run in silent mode, OPatch requires a response file for Oracle Configuration Manager (OCM).
Run /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/OPatch/ocm/bin/emocmrsp to generate an OCM response file. The generated response file can be reused on different platforms and in multiple OPatch silent installs.
To regenerate an OCM response file, rerun /d01/clone/SILP14/apps/tech_st/10.1.3/OPatch/ocm/bin/emocmrsp.
##############################invalid objects before and after of this patch.
there is adpatch option of rollback=y you may try that too.
rgrds
Similar Messages
-
Every PATCH installation fails after installing Windows Updates
Hello,
I want to report an issue which I think is a Windows bug introduced by one of the Windows updates (unfortunately I wasn't able to find out which one of them).
Here is the test case:
1. install a fresh copy of Windows on a test machine
2. install all available Windows Updates (so the system is up to date)
3. create a sample MSI installer which only installs some dummy files (let's say Product Version 1.0.0) and host it on a web server
4. install the MSI from the online location using a command line like this:
msiexec /i http://server/share/package.msi
5. create a .MSP patch (e.g. v1.0.1) which only adds a new file to v1.0.0
6. install the v1.0.1 patch
RESULT: the patch installation fails with the following error message: "The filename , directory name , or volume label syntax is incorrect"
NOTES:
1. the issue was replicated on Windows 7 and 8 machines UP TO DATE
2. the issue is not replicated on a fresh installation of Windows without Updates applied
Is there anyone aware of what could cause this error? Once again the patch installation fails only on Windows machines with the latest Updates installed.
Thx,
DanielHello,
I want to report an issue which I think is a Windows bug introduced by one of the Windows updates (unfortunately I wasn't able to find out which one of them).
Here is the test case:
1. install a fresh copy of Windows on a test machine
2. install all available Windows Updates (so the system is up to date)
3. create a sample MSI installer which only installs some dummy files (let's say Product Version 1.0.0) and host it on a web server
4. install the MSI from the online location using a command line like this:
msiexec /i http://server/share/package.msi
5. create a .MSP patch (e.g. v1.0.1) which only adds a new file to v1.0.0
6. install the v1.0.1 patch
RESULT: the patch installation fails with the following error message: "The filename , directory name , or volume label syntax is incorrect"
NOTES:
1. the issue was replicated on Windows 7 and 8 machines UP TO DATE
2. the issue is not replicated on a fresh installation of Windows without Updates applied
Is there anyone aware of what could cause this error? Once again the patch installation fails only on Windows machines with the latest Updates installed.
Thx,
Daniel -
Hi friends,
As a part of BIAPPS-ODI configuration, @ the step of Applying FMW patches biappshiphome patches is getting failed like in the final patching report im getting error like
----------START OF PATCHING REPORT------------------
* BIAPPSSHIPHOME Patching Report ..........
Patch Failed: fsclite_rel7mlr2_16424872.zip
Patch Failed: BISHIPHOME_11_1_1_7_0_GENERIC_130409_1210_16492220.zip
Patch Failed: atglite_rel7mlr5A_database_16239380.zip
Patch Failed: atglite_rel7mlr5_16480022.zip
Patch Failed: fsmlitedb_rel7mlr2_16424869.zip
Patch Failed: fsmlite_rel7mlr2_16424870.zip
Patch Failed: BISERVER_11_1_1_7_0_WINDOWS_X64_130326_2045_4_16583998.zip
Patch Failed: BIFNDN_11_1_1_7_0_WINDOWS_X64_130322_1000_5_16462147.zip
Since only the above BIAPPSSHIPHOME patches is failing, but the remaining oracle common patching, ODI patching got succeeded. Im getting issue only with the above BIAPPSSHIPHOME patches.
When i tried to view the log file im getting the error like
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 11.1.0.9.9
Copyright (c) 2012, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Oracle Home : C:\Middleware\Oracle_BI1
Central Inventory : C:\Program Files\Oracle\Inventory
from : n/a
OPatch version : 11.1.0.9.9
OUI version : 11.1.0.9.0
Log file location : C:\Middleware\Oracle_BI1\cfgtoollogs\opatch\opatch2013-10-06_10-40-30AM_1.log
OPatch detects the Middleware Home as "C:\Middleware"
Log file location: C:\Middleware\Oracle_BI1\cfgtoollogs\opatch\opatch2013-10-06_10-40-30AM_1.log\
OPatch failed with error code = 73
What could be the issue for the above problem and how it can be solved.
Thanks
Regards,
SaroHi guys,
The issue is been resolved, once after renaming the file patch_locked which is located in the path
C:\Middleware\Oracle_BI1\.patch_storage
Finally I got those biappshiphome patches applied successfully
----------START OF PATCHING REPORT------------------
* BIAPPSSHIPHOME Patching Report ..........
Patch Succeded: fsclite_rel7mlr2_16424872.zip
Patch Succeded: BISHIPHOME_11_1_1_7_0_GENERIC_130409_1210_16492220.zip
Patch Succeded: atglite_rel7mlr5A_database_16239380.zip
Patch Succeded: atglite_rel7mlr5_16480022.zip
Patch Succeded: fsmlitedb_rel7mlr2_16424869.zip
Patch Succeded: fsmlite_rel7mlr2_16424870.zip
Patch Succeded: BISERVER_11_1_1_7_0_WINDOWS_X64_130326_2045_4_16583998.zip
Patch Succeded: BIFNDN_11_1_1_7_0_WINDOWS_X64_130322_1000_5_16462147.zip
* Oracle Common Patching Report ..........
Patch skipped since its already applied: p16433147_111170_Generic.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: p16080773_111170_Generic.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: Webservices_Patch-3-PS6RC3_bug-1648778
.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: p16433036_111170_Generic.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: JDEVADF_REL7MLR10-RT_16525527.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: WebCenter_BP1REL7RC3_16311963.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: fmw_diagnostics_14757820_2.zip
Patch skipped since its already applied: SOACOMMON_REL7B8_16438735.zip
* SOA Patching Report ..........
Not applying SOA Patches since SOA Home (SOA_HOME) value is not specified
* ODI Patching Report ..........
Patch skipped since its already applied: p16629917_111170_Generic.zip
* Weblogic Patching Report ..........
----------END OF PATCHING REPORT------------------
This final patching report log file is also located at: C:\patches\final_patchig_report.log
Regards,
Saro -
Patch 6372396 - FAILED: file FNDLIBR on worker + 6372396
Hi,
i cloned the apps and db.while applying 63772396 patch in windows env, i am getting "Patch 6372396 - FAILED: file FNDLIBR on worker 1" this error.
thanks in advance-ms128m -mx256m -Xrs oracle.aurora.server.tools.loadjava.LoadJavaMain -f -thin -user "APPS/*****@adam.muscat.org:1521:MMAPPS" D:\MMAPPS\mmappsappl\admin\MMAPPS\out\p001ldjva.jar
Calling D:\MMAPPS\mmappscomn\util\java\1.4\j2sdk1.4.2_04\bin\java.exe ...
Error:
Program exited with status 1
Cause: The program terminated, returning status code 1.
Action: Check your installation manual for the meaning of this code on this operating system.java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/aurora/util/tools/ToolException
at oracle.aurora.server.tools.loadjava.LoadJavaMain.<init>(LoadJavaMain.java:51)
at oracle.aurora.server.tools.loadjava.LoadJavaMain.main(LoadJavaMain.java:56)
Exception in thread "main"
AD Worker error:
The above program failed. See the error messages listed
above, if any, or see the log and output files for the program.
Time when worker failed: Wed Jan 06 2010 13:06:08
Manager says to quit.
Time when worker quit: Wed Jan 06 2010 13:08:26
AD Worker is complete.
Errors and warnings are listed in the log file
D:\MMAPPS\mmappsappl\admin\MMAPPS\log\adwork001.log
and in other log files in the same directory. -
I can't update my existing firefox 8.0.1 (when prompted by updater) to 9.0.1 on my new MacBook Pro OS X Lion. Update failed with 'patch apply failed' message.
resolved
-
Patching Always Fails on One WS Type
Since I've implemented Patch Management in my organization I've cycled through several different workstation types, but recently I'm having trouble with this past year's computer model in that patching always fails.
What is happening is that I have narrowed the patching down to doing the individual machines (HP dc7900). I'll select the patches I want to push go through the wizard using default settings and force the restart. The deployment process will go successfully but the install/launches will fail.
In the reporting I'll get a remediate.exe failure with a Windows error: Unknown error (0xffffffff) on the bundle package. On the workstation I'll get notification messages for every patch in the bundle. Overall ZCM status reporting says that the package was successfully deployed but in actuality absolutely zero updates are applied.
This happens the same for every dc7900 in our building which were set up using the same process as dc5700 and two generations of dc5800 workstations that all patch successfully. Has anyone run into a similar situation? Thanks!We make a new "source image" for each computer model that we have so different base images for the 5700, 5800 and 7900. All of our images are made with the same XP SP3 volume license and network deployed apps installed. The 57/5800 systems had Windows Updates enabled as "download and let me choose when to install" but with the 7900 we thought that we would be able to use Patch Management to deploy updates so on the image the updates were turned off, but we have since manually turned them back on to automatic to make sure they keep updating.
I did recently find out that this behavior also follows application bundles on these systems now. I usually deploy bundles as dynamic administrator but have read in another thread that deploying as system may cause less hassles but I haven't had a chance to test this yet. -
while running Firefox it comes on the screen saying security update so after it ties to update this comes on the screen "The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)" I am running Firefox 6.0 and don't seem to have any other issues with it but it asks me several times to do this update but still says it cant do it
I am running windows vistaIf files already have been downloaded then remove the files in the updates and updates\0 folder.
You can also delete the active-update.xml file.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Updates_reported_when_running_newest_version
Software Update not working properly:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Software_Update
* C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates -
Critical patch update fails with error code 73
RDBMS Version: 10.2.0.3
Operating System and Version: solaris 5.9
Error Number (if applicable): error code 73
Product (i.e. SQL*Loader, Import, etc.): oracle server enterpirse edition
Product Version: 10.2.0.3
Critical patch update fails with errors(urgent)
UD00_102030>pwd
/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981
UD00_102030> opatch apply
Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.3.0
Oracle interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.3.0
Copyright (c) 2005, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved..
Oracle Home : /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0
Central Inventory : /u01/app/oracle/oraInventory
from : /var/opt/oracle/oraInst.loc
OPatch version : 10.2.0.3.0
OUI version : 10.2.0.3.0
OUI location : /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/oui
Log file location : /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2007-10-19_19-53-31PM.log
Failed to load the patch object. Possible causes are:
The specified path is not an interim Patch shiphome
Meta-data files are missing from the patch area
Patch location = /mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981
Details = PatchObject constructor: Input file "/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981/etc/config/actions" or "/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981/etc/config/inventory" does not exist.
ApplySession failed: PatchObject constructor: Input file "/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981/etc/config/actions" or "/mnt/base_install/downloads/10gR2/cpu/6394981/etc/config/inventory" does not exist.
System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
OPatch failed with error code 73
This cpu oct 2007 patch for 10.2.0.3(for solaris)That's great :) ...
Does anybody know which is the difference between
opatch napply
and
opatch apply ?
thanks,
P. -
Firefox has worked flawlessly for yrs until 10 days ago. Firefox tries to upgrade / update automatically but can't and my attempts to update manually also fail. each time the failure is because :
" The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)"
What ever a patch is, I don't know.
This is happening on two of my computers. Both using XP with service pack 3.
Both use Comodo CIS...and have for over a year.Hello,
Try installing a new copy of Firefox:
* https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/
Or if you need a different localized version:
* https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/
Does Comodo CIS itself block the installation? After downloading the latest version, try putting the executable for Firefox on a safe list if you can. -
Update to FF5.0 fails. patch apply fails.
The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)
This response shows up on software update window.
I am still stuck on FF4. Not getting the 5.0 version installed for some reason.Hi Steve,
Not a solution I'm afraid, but I also get an error message, 'cept mine states I'm not connected to the internet even though I am. I'd also like a solution!
Pete -
When updating Mozilla, I get this message:
"The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)".
What should be done?With that one, I'd try updating using a .dmg installer downloaded from the Apple Website:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/ -
The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)
The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)
Stuck on FF4.0. Update to 5.0 fails to install.Ok I'll try that when I have time. TYVM I think your right, it should work.
Just haven't been to worried about it as 4.0 is doing ok with me. But I may as well get the newer version huh? -
Update failed. The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed). It appears to want to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 8. But when I click the link, it does not offer updates, just an entire strip/reinstall! Where is the updates page? Help?
Thank you. I don't want to reload the entire thing - yes, it can be entirely reloaded, but I don't want to lose settings. How do I upload the PATCH as offered?
-
Hi All
my customer scan one workstation ,and deliver 6 patches to this client. but he find only 5/6 patches update fine. I check the setting of the ZPM Bundle, all patches were set "continue on failure"....why the patch update fail (it is unpatched on this workstation),and whether the Bundle will auto re-send the patch again or not ?
wyldkaowyld,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://forums.novell.com/ -
Patch 6880880 (Upgrade Opatch Utility)
Hi Guys,
I need to apply Patch 6880880. From what I understand from the documentation and some posts about this patch is that this patch is nothing but upgrading the version of hpatch/Opatch.
When I unzip folder p6880880_101000_MSWIN-x86-64.zip, it makes a folder called Opatch (according to earlier posts I need to overwrite the existing folder OPatch folder) in the Hyperion directory .
But I am afraid to do that because the new OPatch folder resulting from unzipping the p6880880_101000_MSWIN-x86-64.zip file doesnt contain hpatch.bat.
I need hpatch.bat because I further need to apply couple of more patches (9976978 and 11794962) to fix some HFM security issue. And the patch 6880880 is pre-requisite for patches 9976978 and 11794962.
Please suggest.
ThanksThanks for the reply John!
You mean just rename old Opatch folder to Opatch_old and unzip the new folder to D:\Hyperion?. Or make a copy of old Opatch folder in some other directory and then just simply unzip the new Opatch folder and overwrite the existing?.
Also, I hope by doing this any existing patch that has been applied in the past doest get effected?
Thanks
Maybe you are looking for
-
DPM (ID 30101 Détails : data error ( cyclic redundancy check) 0x80070017)
Dear all, We are running DPM 2010 with a virtual tape library "firestreamer" Sometime for no reason we get this error on DPM ( none on firestreamer ): DPM a rencontré une erreur critique lors d'une opération d'E/S sur la bande Travail-LT-1Jours-Copie
-
In apple map iOS 6.0 direction not available for any route in india
direction is not available in india ios 6.0
-
Copy and paste Java script for password protecting a page?
I need to password protect one page which I want to call my LOGIN page on a site I'm making in Dreamweaver CS5.5. Unfortunately I know that the hosting company I'm using does not have the ability to allow me password a single directory on the server
-
Restricted code for nokia 6280 is needed
i am pleading to every body in the house, i want to unlock my nokia 6280. 3 network. the was brought from london to me in nigeria, has all my effort to insert sim into the phone but the phone is requesting for restricted code.. Thank you for the assi
-
Hi All can anyone tell me how EDI settings are done for Purchase orders and intercompany billing docs. Transaction codes would be of much help step by step.i think i know there are four Tcodes. WEL1 for logical address , WE20 for partner profiles and