Payment Scheme amount adjustment on periodic review

Hi Experts,
Can you please explain me adjustment of extrapolated amount and bill amount, while periodc review. or any document which explain me that, i have debug the program but found nothing.
Example : In periodic review invoice generated for 300 and extrapolation amount will be 600.
In simple case new line on Payment Scheme, extrapolated amount is 900 and bill amount is 300 and instilment amount is 100 per mount ( 600 /12 )
but in some casa the extrapolated amount is differ from extrapolated amount. i observe this deviation comes from last line item of payment scheme that is adjusted due to new line item creation.
I can able to explain the how new extrapolation amount comes but i can't able to explain why this is happening in some case.
Regards
Naresh

Hi!
The process is as follows:
Invoice Entry                       : F-43
Outgoing payment              : F-53
Downpayment                    :F-48
TRansfer amount from Downpayment(Special GL) to normal GL: F-54
Then Clear Normal item       :F-44
First you transfer the advance amount from special GL to Normal GL through F-54(to clear advance payment). Then it will convert the special GL to normal GL to clear the advance amount. Then you clear advance payment through F-44 which is converted as normal item. If still the invoice amount is more than the advance amount, after clearing the advance amount you can clear balance amount by F-44

Similar Messages

  • Payment scheme and its behaviour in FPL9

    Hi Experts,
    I have a concern,
    Anybody can explain Payment schem Request and its behaviour?
    As statistical line item impact and real item impact and when it will go to down payments tab?
    some times i can see same document in few situtions, i am quite confuse. Can you anybody can hlpe on this please?
    Thanks,
    Abash

    Hi Abash,
    Payment scheme is a budget billing plan that is offered in SAP for customers accounts where customers wants to pay a constant amount for yearly consumption, so for this the SAP extrapolates the billing line item and gives a amount based on payment frequency , for .e.g $50 per week
    Now as customer is not going to pay  the invoice amount as customer is on payment scheme, customer will pay the payment scheme amount will settle his invoice,so to take payment scheme payment a line item is required against which customer will be charged its a statistical line item, now when customer pays this amount statistical item gets cleared and payment will reside as down payment , which in turn will clear invoice in account maintenance
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Lalit

  • Payment Scheme - Extrapolation Amount

    Hi All,
    This is regarding payment scheme that we create through transaction EA61PS.
    The problem is: The extrapolation amount that system calculates is only for one installment (i.e. one month). The requirement was to enhance the extrapolation period from standard 3 months to 12 months. But now when I see, even 3 month extrapolation is not happening.
    Pls help.
    Regards,
    Bhaskar

    Hello,
    To determine the start and end date of the extrapolation period for creating the payment scheme you can use event R510.
    Event R510 used to determine the start and end date of the extrapolation period for creating the payment scheme.
    The system uses parameter X_OBJ-EP_PERIOD to determine the process from
    which the budget billing extrapolation is called:
        M  Manual creation of payment scheme(EA61PS)
        E  Move-in
    The standard function module for this event is Determine Extrapolation
    Period for Payment Scheme (ISU_GET_EXTRAPOLAT_PERIOD_R510).
    In this function module, the start date is always set to the start date
    of the billing period for which the payment scheme is created.
    Exception: If the move-in date comes after the start date of the billing
    period. In this case, the start date of the extrapolation period is set
    to the same as the move-in date.
    The end date of the extrapolation period is always the same as the end
    date of the billing period.
    If you define your own extrapolation period in this event, it does not
    have any effect on the billing period.
    This means that if you change the extrapolation period to a full year,
    for example, the resulting amount is still only divided amongst the
    payment scheme requests remaining in the current billing period.
    I hope this information is useful for you.
    Regards
    Olivia

  • Payment scheme termination

    Hi Experts,
    I have created a function module which will call a standard function module ' ISU_PAYSCHEME_TERMINATE'. Can any tell me how this FM will work and where can I see its effect?
    Regards,
    Pravesh Gupta.

    You use transaction E61PSD or method TERMINATE of BOR object PAYSCHEME to end a payment
    scheme.
    Select a payment scheme that you want to end and enter the end date. If you have maintained table
    Payment Scheme Deactivation Reason (TE561), enter a deactivation reason as well. This has no effect
    on the deactivation process and is not analyzed by the system. However, you can use it at a later point intime to analyze the deactivated payment schemes.
    Once you have entered the end date, the system checks whether payment scheme requests that have
    already been paid exist after the end date. If this is the case, the end date is set to the next due date plus
    one day.
    Depending on the sequence of the end date and the first payment date of the payment scheme, the
    system proceeds as follows:
    u2022 If the end date lies before the first payment date of the payment scheme, the payment scheme is
    deleted from the database. If you have already created statistical requests for this payment scheme,
    they are cleared.
    u2022 If the end date lies after the first payment date of the payment scheme, the system executes the
    following actions:
    a. The payment scheme sample line that is active on the end date is prorated so that its end
    date is the same as the end date of the payment scheme. A new sample line is created for
    the part of the sample line that comes after the end date.
    b. All payment scheme sample lines with a start date that comes after the end date are
    deactivated.
    c. The end date and, if necessary, the deactivation reason are entered in the payment scheme
    header data.
    d. All statistical requests with due dates that lie after the end date are cleared.
    Payment schemes that are ended this way remain active until the end date. You can either change
    the payment scheme manually or during creation of an interim or periodic bill. You can also create
    statistical requests for this payment scheme. You can change the end date again as long as the
    new date comes before the end date that was entered previously.
    In order to ensure that a payment scheme can no longer be changed, you must deactivate it once it
    has ended. You do this by creating an interim or periodic bill with a billing period that contains the
    end date of the payment scheme. During creation of this bill, all payment scheme requests that
    have not yet been paid are cleared. Requests with due dates that come after the most recent
    interim or periodic bill and that have already been paid are settled against the current consumption
    billing when the bill is created. Any overpayments can be refunded at a later point in time. The
    system removes the clearing restriction u201CRu201D from all items that were transferred to the payment
    scheme that have not yet been paid.
    If the interim/periodic bill is reversed, the entire process is cancelled. This means that the clearing of
    the paid requests against the transferred items and the current consumption billing is also reversed.
    All items that had the clearing restriction u201CRu201D before the bill was created are assigned it again.
    u2022 If you enter the current date as the end date, the system may react differently to the above
    description. This happens when event Automatic Account Maintenance When Payment Scheme is
    Ended (R531) returns parameter X_NO_ACC_MAIN (No Automatic Account Maintenance When PS
    is Ended) with the value " ". When the payment scheme is ended, the system carries out integrated
    automatic account maintenance. In account maintenance, all payment scheme requests that were
    paid after the last interim/periodic bill are settled against all the open items that were transferred to
    the payment scheme. If the payments are not enough to clear the items, the clearing restriction u201CRu201D
    is removed from the remaining open items. If the amount paid is too high, the clearing restriction u201CRu201D
    is removed from the payment scheme request payments that are not required for account
    maintenance. You can either refund the customer directly or settle the excess payment in the next
    consumption billing.
    Regards,
    Shiva Kumar

  • Installment plan v/s payment schema

    Hello,
    Instalment paln and payment schema(Budget Billling) both does the same functions.If i am right what are the differences.
    which gives the higher flexibility?where, how , when we use????

    The biggest difference in payment schemes such as budget billing and installment plans is not in the term, but in the purpose of use.
    Budget billing is created upfront for a certain period, using an estimation of the consumption to come over that period. It's used to spread upcoming bills in time (for example, based on your previous year, you'll have to pay 600u20AC in six months time, therefor we'll make you a budget billing already charging you 100u20AC each month until you receive you invoice).
    Budget billing is (always) deducted from your next invoice, after which a new bbp starts.
    Installment plans are used to pay off debt, after they are already invoices. Installment plans are made from open items, which are combined and redistributed over a couple of months. So, it's for bills you should already have paid, but for which you didn't have the money at the time. For example: you have two unpaid invoices, one for 100u20AC and one for 250u20AC. You cannot paid them this month and ask you utility company for a plan. They create an installment plan for 350u20AC, spreading this amount over 7 months, so you'll have to pay 50u20AC each month.
    Usually, there's no need to which between BBP and installment plans. They can be use indepentently and can co-exist for one customer. You can use invoiced BBP items in an installment plan (because once invoices they are just open items). You can also cancel an installment plan and retrieve the original open items.
    Hope this helps!

  • Down payment due amount issue

    Dear Experts,
    kindly guide me with reference to the down payment amount and work flow. I have already raised this issue on
    Amout check on Down payment Invoice
    Is there any possibility to handle the down payment invoice amount paid and remaining while booking multiple down payment invoices against same P/O and S/O, as the default system functionality allow us to book down payment amount more then the reffed P/O amount. and when we try to create a normal invoice while selecting the respective the down payments( which totals are more then the actual invoice ), then system shows amount exceeding error.
    kindly suggest a solution.
    Regards,
    Awais

    Hi Awais,
    Let me explain the background of the system behavior.
    Based on your explanation I assume you refer to the US localization of Down Payments. The scenario which you describe is a definition of the system. The reason for the functionality is following:
    There is a possibility to create Down Payment based on the Sales/Purchase order. After the creation of the payment there is in the background created Down Payment Invoice in the system.
    The Order is not accounting document and there is no posting behind it, there is possibility to adjust it after the creation of the Down Payment Invoice. Such edited Order can be base for another Down Payment. System is not blocking the creation of subsequent DP Invoices because the final value of the Order is unknown. It is definitive only when Delivery/Final Invoice is created out of it.
    The system proposes the usage of the Down Payment when Final Invoice is created out of the Order. The proposed amount is in value of the Invoice total, however it is possible to adjust the linked Down Payments in Down Payment to draw screen.
    Regards,
    Martin Slavik
    Solution Manager

  • Payment Scheme Error--

    Hi ALL,
    I am doing Payment Scheme configuration, while creation of payment scheme i am getting the following error message:
    Tax jurisdiction code is not permitted for payment scheme procedure
    Message no. EPS117
    Could you please help me....
    Thanks,
    KK

    Hi,
    we all ready maintained tax jurisdiction at connection object & BP level.
    could you give me is there any other configuration settings involved this area...
    Thank,
    KK

  • Payment Process Request split output by payment batch amount

    Hello,
    I have task to create multiple electronic outputs from payment process request.
    Example: I run payment process request with 4 payments (A, B, C, D) with amounts: 1000$, 2000$, 3000$, 2500$ then in payment process it splits by payee into 3 payments (E, f, g) with amounts: 1000$, 5000$ and 2500$. Then I have payment amount, for example 2500$, that means that into 1 payment output I can put only payments that sums below 2500$ or only one that is greater than 2500$. Other payments necessary to put into new outputs. Oracle standard process "Format Payment Instructions with Text Output" create only 1 output with all payments in other cases but if there is chosen my payment profile then it necessary a lot of outputs.
    Example with outputs where limit 2500$ amount sum for multiple payments else 1 payment:
    1. output: 1 payment with amount sum 1000$
    2. output: 1 payment with amount sum 5000$
    3. output: 2 payments with amount sum 2500$
    Question: Is it possible to create such custumization with Oracle Standard Payment Batch creation process?
    Or you have another ideas?
    Thanks!
    Edited by: 966870 on 2012.22.10 05:52

    Hello,
    I have task to create multiple electronic outputs from payment process request.
    Example: I run payment process request with 4 payments (A, B, C, D) with amounts: 1000$, 2000$, 3000$, 2500$ then in payment process it splits by payee into 3 payments (E, f, g) with amounts: 1000$, 5000$ and 2500$. Then I have payment amount, for example 2500$, that means that into 1 payment output I can put only payments that sums below 2500$ or only one that is greater than 2500$. Other payments necessary to put into new outputs. Oracle standard process "Format Payment Instructions with Text Output" create only 1 output with all payments in other cases but if there is chosen my payment profile then it necessary a lot of outputs.
    Example with outputs where limit 2500$ amount sum for multiple payments else 1 payment:
    1. output: 1 payment with amount sum 1000$
    2. output: 1 payment with amount sum 5000$
    3. output: 2 payments with amount sum 2500$
    Question: Is it possible to create such custumization with Oracle Standard Payment Batch creation process?
    Or you have another ideas?
    Thanks!
    Edited by: 966870 on 2012.22.10 05:52

  • Payment scheme in ISU

    Hi ,
    I am getting a error of "Extrapolation is in-consistence for equipment #### and reg ## ,while creating payment scheme through EA61PS.
    Can anyone please suggest me where the issue might be ?
    Thanks,
    Bighnajit 

    Hi Bighnajit,
    The error that you are getting is triggered from a standard include program and can be because of the following reasons-
    (a)Too less Quantity-
         -Meter reading had an overflow, but the previous reading had none.
        - No overflow in previous reading and current reading is still higher than previous.No over flow gets billed.
    (b) Both readings had an overflow and current reading is lower than previous reading. (Normally this doesn't happen).
    (c) The current reading has no overflow, the previous reading has an overflow,but after the correction the current reading is lower than the previous. This is  inconsistent, because the previous reading can't be estimated the current reading.
    Check SAP Note 920277 for more information on the same.
    Also check SAP Note 909301 and 1895896 if you are having any of these scenarios...
    Hope it helps...
    Thanks,
    Amlan

  • Post of Late payment surcharge amount.

    Hi Experts,
             In my project, i am calculating the late payment surcharge amount ( LPSC Amount) through custom programme aganist the contract acccount and storing it in a custom table.
    Custom program calculates LPSC amount in  the day in which incoming payment is received against any charge (including invoice). LPSC is calculated in a time dependant slabs, depending on clearing date > net due date.
    Can anyone help me how to post the calculated amount to the contract account.
    Regards,
    Paul

    Hi,
    You can use BAPI_CTRACDOCUMENT_CREATE to post a Fi-CA document.
    Thanks,
    Amlan

  • How to reverse payment scheme request line which has origin as RO

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement to reverse the payment scheme request line.
    need help on this how to reverse this line item.
    Regards,
    Lalit

    Hi Praveen,
    Thank you very much for your reply. I appreciate your time and efforts.
    Ok, these are the steps how I have executed the process.
    - I have created a service contract for an equipment. In the service contract, I have maintained the service material in the line item, maintained price and assigned equipment in the technical objects.
    - I created service notification, which automatically picked up contract.
    - When I create service order, from notification screen, system automatically picked up correct order type SM01 (Service order with contract).
    - Then I planned operations and spare parts in the service order.
    - Checked settlement rule in the service order is SDI.
    - released and saved service order.
    - Using IW42, in SAP ECC6, you can perform  both time confirmation and material consumption using the same screen and also TECO service order. System issues message to say, goods issue have been posted.
    - when you check the document flow of service order, you can see operations posted, and also goods issue posted.
    - check cost tab to see actual costs. (if I want to settle costs from service order to service contract, I can do so w/o a problem in KO88)
    - Use DP90, enter service order number and create billing request. System takes to billing request screen but it is blank. No line items.
    - So, since there is a contract, in this case, am I meant to be creating the billing request from Service contract? instead of from Service order?
    I hope I have clarified myself better this time.
    Best regards,
    Abdul Rafey

  • Need to find test data with payments include earning from past periods

    I am new to Oracle Payroll and need to find test cases which payments include earning from past periods.
    I have an R12.1 Vision environment but cannot run Payroll due to issue with Vertex, but I do have front-end and database access.
    Wonder any Reports/ Forms I can use to locate sample data with earning from past periods?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    You can use oracle standard form to query old processed payroll for your desired pay periods.
    Navigation is Your HRMS responsibility >View >Payroll Process Results.
    In this you need to choose payroll name,from date,to date and click find.
    for e.g. in your vision instance you can query with payroll as "Vision Monthly" from "12 2008 Calendar Month" to will be "10 2013 Calendar Month" and find the result.
    choose any of the record and view result by further click on Assignment Process button than next click on SOE Report.
    Regards,
    VISHAL DANGI
    Edited by: VISHAL DANGI on Jun 19, 2012 12:50 AM

  • AUD: Interfaced CIP/RWIP Amounts by FA Period Report

    I am trying to reconcile the Assets capitalised in a Period.
    Is this the correct report to use and will I be able to control the data which appears in the report using the FA Period parameters. For example, if I
    want to analyse Assets capitalised in Q1 2103 if I use FA Period from = Jan-13 and FA Period to = MAR-13 will the report just display asset capitalised in
    those periods?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Tom

    Hi Tom,
    AUD: Interfaced CIP/RWIP Amounts by FA Period Report to view a summary of assets and asset lines interfaced from Oracle Projects to Oracle Assets.
    Optionally choose to sort the report by asset category or project number.
    You must run the process PRC: Tieback Asset Lines from Oracle Assets before you run the AUD: Interfaced CIP/RWIP Amounts By FA Period Report.
    Regards
    Raghavender K

  • Adjust the depreciation amount in posted period

    Hi Experts,
    I've changed one of my asset depreciation key from 20% to 10% straight line method. The changes is done in period 6. I have run AFAR for this changes.
    Let say my planned depreciation was 1000 (for 20% dep. key) and now the new depreciation would be 500 (for 10% dep key). I would like the depreciation to be recalculate in period 1 (i.e 1000 minus 500) and distribute the amount evenly throughout the period (period 1 to 6). Is it possible?
    I've run AFAB in planned mode and the changes (lump sum) will only take places on next period (period 7). When i execute AFAB in restart mode (period 1), the error says restart is not possible for period 1.
    Appreciate your advise.

    Hi Nana,
    Have a look also at KBA 1534331 - RAPOST2000 - How to post 'planned depreciation' for
    subsequent posting or depreciation change in same period
    This knowledge base article describes the situation how the system will pick up the depreciation adjustment when a change in depreciation terms (e.g. change of depreciation key) has been made.
    As Mukthar is pointing out, if you have run depreciation already (ordinary planned depreciation run in AFAB), and afterwards you make a change, you can start a repeat run for that very same period again and it will adjust the value equally to all periods going forward.
    You find in this KBA also an attachment which outlines an example.
    I hope this helps further in understanding how depreciation is adjusted after a change of depreciation terms.
    Best regards,
    Brigitte

  • Down payment request for contract with periodic billing

    Hi Friends,
    Could anyone help me in understanding the configuration settings for down payment / advance payment senario for a CONTRACT which has Order related billing (I have done for Order with milestone billing plan).
    The contract has order related *periodic billing plan* where settlement period is suppose quaterly billing and actual invoice is happening on 1st date of the quarter. But i want to create a down payment request say 10 days before the billing date[(actual invoice(F2) date] of every quater as an advance payment/ down payment.
    FYI...
    For order i am using standard billing rule 1 in milestone billing plan for final invoice but for downpaymnet billing dates (added additional settlement periods then actual invoice settlement period like 3 adv pay ment og 20%, 30% 50% & one actual invoice period for whole amount 100% as D4 doc only) i am manually changing the billing rule as 4 to create a down payment req.
    But in contract as its has periodic billing plan no billing rule changing option (no additional settlement period can be added, only settlement period for actual invoice is getting proposed) so i can't have two different rule for a settlement period. no settlement period can be added separately for adv paymnet/down payment.
    Kindly respond ASAP.
    Rgds
    Manish

    Hi, Many thanks for your response.
    But the down payment functionality for a SO with milestone billing i have already implemented.
    The question was for CONTRACT Side (say rental / service contract). The contract has periodic billing (monthly / Q'ly).
    Kindly let me know if you/anyone has any idea for config settings for a contract with the senario mentioned in previous thread post.
    Thnx & Rgds
    MG

Maybe you are looking for