Payment Scheme - Extrapolation Amount

Hi All,
This is regarding payment scheme that we create through transaction EA61PS.
The problem is: The extrapolation amount that system calculates is only for one installment (i.e. one month). The requirement was to enhance the extrapolation period from standard 3 months to 12 months. But now when I see, even 3 month extrapolation is not happening.
Pls help.
Regards,
Bhaskar

Hello,
To determine the start and end date of the extrapolation period for creating the payment scheme you can use event R510.
Event R510 used to determine the start and end date of the extrapolation period for creating the payment scheme.
The system uses parameter X_OBJ-EP_PERIOD to determine the process from
which the budget billing extrapolation is called:
M Manual creation of payment scheme(EA61PS)
E Move-in
The standard function module for this event is Determine Extrapolation
Period for Payment Scheme (ISU_GET_EXTRAPOLAT_PERIOD_R510).
In this function module, the start date is always set to the start date
of the billing period for which the payment scheme is created.
Exception: If the move-in date comes after the start date of the billing
period. In this case, the start date of the extrapolation period is set
to the same as the move-in date.
The end date of the extrapolation period is always the same as the end
date of the billing period.
If you define your own extrapolation period in this event, it does not
have any effect on the billing period.
This means that if you change the extrapolation period to a full year,
for example, the resulting amount is still only divided amongst the
payment scheme requests remaining in the current billing period.
I hope this information is useful for you.
Regards
Olivia

Similar Messages

Payment Scheme amount adjustment on periodic review

Hi Experts,
Can you please explain me adjustment of extrapolated amount and bill amount, while periodc review. or any document which explain me that, i have debug the program but found nothing.
Example : In periodic review invoice generated for 300 and extrapolation amount will be 600.
In simple case new line on Payment Scheme, extrapolated amount is 900 and bill amount is 300 and instilment amount is 100 per mount ( 600 /12 )
but in some casa the extrapolated amount is differ from extrapolated amount. i observe this deviation comes from last line item of payment scheme that is adjusted due to new line item creation.
I can able to explain the how new extrapolation amount comes but i can't able to explain why this is happening in some case.
Regards
Naresh

Hi!
The process is as follows:
Invoice Entry                       : F-43
Outgoing payment              : F-53
Downpayment                    :F-48
TRansfer amount from Downpayment(Special GL) to normal GL: F-54
Then Clear Normal item       :F-44
First you transfer the advance amount from special GL to Normal GL through F-54(to clear advance payment). Then it will convert the special GL to normal GL to clear the advance amount. Then you clear advance payment through F-44 which is converted as normal item. If still the invoice amount is more than the advance amount, after clearing the advance amount you can clear balance amount by F-44

Payment scheme termination

Hi Experts,
I have created a function module which will call a standard function module ' ISU_PAYSCHEME_TERMINATE'. Can any tell me how this FM will work and where can I see its effect?
Regards,
Pravesh Gupta.

You use transaction E61PSD or method TERMINATE of BOR object PAYSCHEME to end a payment
scheme.
Select a payment scheme that you want to end and enter the end date. If you have maintained table
Payment Scheme Deactivation Reason (TE561), enter a deactivation reason as well. This has no effect
on the deactivation process and is not analyzed by the system. However, you can use it at a later point intime to analyze the deactivated payment schemes.
Once you have entered the end date, the system checks whether payment scheme requests that have
already been paid exist after the end date. If this is the case, the end date is set to the next due date plus
one day.
Depending on the sequence of the end date and the first payment date of the payment scheme, the
system proceeds as follows:
u2022 If the end date lies before the first payment date of the payment scheme, the payment scheme is
deleted from the database. If you have already created statistical requests for this payment scheme,
they are cleared.
u2022 If the end date lies after the first payment date of the payment scheme, the system executes the
following actions:
a. The payment scheme sample line that is active on the end date is prorated so that its end
date is the same as the end date of the payment scheme. A new sample line is created for
the part of the sample line that comes after the end date.
b. All payment scheme sample lines with a start date that comes after the end date are
deactivated.
c. The end date and, if necessary, the deactivation reason are entered in the payment scheme
header data.
d. All statistical requests with due dates that lie after the end date are cleared.
Payment schemes that are ended this way remain active until the end date. You can either change
the payment scheme manually or during creation of an interim or periodic bill. You can also create
statistical requests for this payment scheme. You can change the end date again as long as the
new date comes before the end date that was entered previously.
In order to ensure that a payment scheme can no longer be changed, you must deactivate it once it
has ended. You do this by creating an interim or periodic bill with a billing period that contains the
end date of the payment scheme. During creation of this bill, all payment scheme requests that
have not yet been paid are cleared. Requests with due dates that come after the most recent
interim or periodic bill and that have already been paid are settled against the current consumption
billing when the bill is created. Any overpayments can be refunded at a later point in time. The
system removes the clearing restriction u201CRu201D from all items that were transferred to the payment
scheme that have not yet been paid.
If the interim/periodic bill is reversed, the entire process is cancelled. This means that the clearing of
the paid requests against the transferred items and the current consumption billing is also reversed.
All items that had the clearing restriction u201CRu201D before the bill was created are assigned it again.
u2022 If you enter the current date as the end date, the system may react differently to the above
description. This happens when event Automatic Account Maintenance When Payment Scheme is
Ended (R531) returns parameter X_NO_ACC_MAIN (No Automatic Account Maintenance When PS
is Ended) with the value " ". When the payment scheme is ended, the system carries out integrated
automatic account maintenance. In account maintenance, all payment scheme requests that were
paid after the last interim/periodic bill are settled against all the open items that were transferred to
the payment scheme. If the payments are not enough to clear the items, the clearing restriction u201CRu201D
is removed from the remaining open items. If the amount paid is too high, the clearing restriction u201CRu201D
is removed from the payment scheme request payments that are not required for account
maintenance. You can either refund the customer directly or settle the excess payment in the next
consumption billing.
Regards,
Shiva Kumar

Payment scheme and its behaviour in FPL9

Hi Experts,
I have a concern,
Anybody can explain Payment schem Request and its behaviour?
As statistical line item impact and real item impact and when it will go to down payments tab?
some times i can see same document in few situtions, i am quite confuse. Can you anybody can hlpe on this please?
Thanks,
Abash

Hi Abash,
Payment scheme is a budget billing plan that is offered in SAP for customers accounts where customers wants to pay a constant amount for yearly consumption, so for this the SAP extrapolates the billing line item and gives a amount based on payment frequency , for .e.g $50 per week
Now as customer is not going to pay the invoice amount as customer is on payment scheme, customer will pay the payment scheme amount will settle his invoice,so to take payment scheme payment a line item is required against which customer will be charged its a statistical line item, now when customer pays this amount statistical item gets cleared and payment will reside as down payment , which in turn will clear invoice in account maintenance
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Lalit

Payment scheme in ISU

Hi ,
I am getting a error of "Extrapolation is in-consistence for equipment #### and reg ## ,while creating payment scheme through EA61PS.
Can anyone please suggest me where the issue might be ?
Thanks,
Bighnajit

Hi Bighnajit,
The error that you are getting is triggered from a standard include program and can be because of the following reasons-
(a)Too less Quantity-
-Meter reading had an overflow, but the previous reading had none.
- No overflow in previous reading and current reading is still higher than previous.No over flow gets billed.
(b) Both readings had an overflow and current reading is lower than previous reading. (Normally this doesn't happen).
(c) The current reading has no overflow, the previous reading has an overflow,but after the correction the current reading is lower than the previous. This is inconsistent, because the previous reading can't be estimated the current reading.
Check SAP Note 920277 for more information on the same.
Also check SAP Note 909301 and 1895896 if you are having any of these scenarios...
Hope it helps...
Thanks,
Amlan

Installment plan v/s payment schema

Hello,
Instalment paln and payment schema(Budget Billling) both does the same functions.If i am right what are the differences.
which gives the higher flexibility?where, how , when we use????

The biggest difference in payment schemes such as budget billing and installment plans is not in the term, but in the purpose of use.
Budget billing is created upfront for a certain period, using an estimation of the consumption to come over that period. It's used to spread upcoming bills in time (for example, based on your previous year, you'll have to pay 600u20AC in six months time, therefor we'll make you a budget billing already charging you 100u20AC each month until you receive you invoice).
Budget billing is (always) deducted from your next invoice, after which a new bbp starts.
Installment plans are used to pay off debt, after they are already invoices. Installment plans are made from open items, which are combined and redistributed over a couple of months. So, it's for bills you should already have paid, but for which you didn't have the money at the time. For example: you have two unpaid invoices, one for 100u20AC and one for 250u20AC. You cannot paid them this month and ask you utility company for a plan. They create an installment plan for 350u20AC, spreading this amount over 7 months, so you'll have to pay 50u20AC each month.
Usually, there's no need to which between BBP and installment plans. They can be use indepentently and can co-exist for one customer. You can use invoiced BBP items in an installment plan (because once invoices they are just open items). You can also cancel an installment plan and retrieve the original open items.
Hope this helps!

Payment Scheme Error--

Hi ALL,
I am doing Payment Scheme configuration, while creation of payment scheme i am getting the following error message:
Tax jurisdiction code is not permitted for payment scheme procedure
Message no. EPS117
Could you please help me....
Thanks,
KK

Hi,
we all ready maintained tax jurisdiction at connection object & BP level.
could you give me is there any other configuration settings involved this area...
Thank,
KK

Outgoing payment with Zero amount when Full adance is paid

I am making A/P down payment request based on purchase order, then I make full payment of PO (full advance payment - no amount of payment left with) through "Outgoing payment" which creates negative amount in Business partner balance and shows a negative entry in "outgoing payment" screen. Moving further, I make Goods receipt PO and then I make A/P invoice of regular amount based on goods receipt PO / Purchase order.
Up till now, the full payment has been made in advance through A/P down payment request and upon receiving goods the A/P invoice of regular amount is received. Now when I go to "outgoing payments" I have no amount left to pay (i.e. It displays 2 entries of same amount, one with positive amount of A/P invoice and the other one with negative amount of A/P down payment request to show the due balance = zero) So I am trying to clear the vendor "outgoing payments" by paying with Zero amount, but the system shows the error "The confirmation amount should be greater than Zero".
How can I clear the vendor "Outgoing payments" with zero amount ?? as it's payment has been made in advance.
Note: Please give me the solution by keeping in mind that I have to pay full amount in advance.
Solution to this problem would be highly appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Farhan Sufi

Hi Farhan Sufi,
For Cases where full Advance is paid initially, You Follow these procedure, I have tested in my DB its working fine.
Step 1: Raise a Purchase order Say Rs 1000/-
Step 2: Raise a GR(PO) of Rs 1000/-
Step 3: Go To A/P Down Pmt -
Select the Vendor -
Say copy from GR(PO), And select te One you wanted. At the bottom in the DPM Field give 100% and Add the Document.
Step 4: Raise Out Going Payment by linking to the A/P Down Pmt what you have posted. ie., Go To Out Going Pmt Screen---Select the Vendor, This will display all invoices, Down pmts, Credit Memos, and JE's. Select the A/P Down Pmt what you have posted and go to payment means fill in the respective field and add the document.
Step 5: Go To A/P Invoice Screen, select the vendor. And click on Copy from GR(PO), Select the respective GR(PO) document.
And At the Bottom double click on Total Down Payment Button, This will display the list of all Down Payments for which Out going payments are also posted. Here Select the respective Down payment and add the document.
When you add this A/P Invoice document gets added and the status of the document will be closed. As you have made full payment in the A/P Down Payment Screen.
And This Invoice will not appear in the Out Going Screen as the document is closed.
Cheers,
Sree.

I purchased app, the Itune rejected the terms of payment but the amount deducted from my account

I purchased app, although the I tune rejected the terms of payment but the amount deducted from my account.
I already paied for the app which I dont have

A debit visa should have worked, depending on the bank they sometimes block electronic purchase like this a quick fix is an iTunes gift card via you local corner store

How to reverse payment scheme request line which has origin as RO

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to reverse the payment scheme request line.
need help on this how to reverse this line item.
Regards,
Lalit

Hi Praveen,
Thank you very much for your reply. I appreciate your time and efforts.
Ok, these are the steps how I have executed the process.
- I have created a service contract for an equipment. In the service contract, I have maintained the service material in the line item, maintained price and assigned equipment in the technical objects.
- I created service notification, which automatically picked up contract.
- When I create service order, from notification screen, system automatically picked up correct order type SM01 (Service order with contract).
- Then I planned operations and spare parts in the service order.
- Checked settlement rule in the service order is SDI.
- released and saved service order.
- Using IW42, in SAP ECC6, you can perform both time confirmation and material consumption using the same screen and also TECO service order. System issues message to say, goods issue have been posted.
- when you check the document flow of service order, you can see operations posted, and also goods issue posted.
- check cost tab to see actual costs. (if I want to settle costs from service order to service contract, I can do so w/o a problem in KO88)
- Use DP90, enter service order number and create billing request. System takes to billing request screen but it is blank. No line items.
- So, since there is a contract, in this case, am I meant to be creating the billing request from Service contract? instead of from Service order?
I hope I have clarified myself better this time.
Best regards,
Abdul Rafey

Payment clearing on amount with mismatching business areas

Hi, gurus:
We recently activated AR module under 4.6c.
We use automatic clearing which calls FB1D, based on amount match between the cash receipt and the invoice.
The invoice comes with an business area, but the cash receipt record (RM doc type) has a blank business area.
The payment will clear, but SAP actually creates a new WO record to clear the invoice. The WO record contains the business area from the invoice.
The RM cash receipt record has no business area after the payment clearance. This creates a problem for us during reporting for the business area, and the new WO record also screws up the real WO amount in our Write-Off reports.
Is there a user exit in FB1D(SAPMF05A) that would allow us to add the business area to the RM record during payment clearance, and avoid the creation of the WO record ?
Thanks.

May be you can use Substitutions:
http://webmailmty.softtek.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/5b/d231a843c611d182b30000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards.

Manual Payment (J04102) - Missing Amounts in The Payment Lines (Fold)

Dear Fellows;
I need your helps on this annoying issue.
We use JDE Wolrd in AS400 database environment.
We have a problem in J04102 (Enter Manual Payments) when matching the payment amount with the pay items (invoices).
In the screen, we cannot view the amounts in the lines under "Amount Applied" column. You can only view them if you unfold
the lines with F4 and can you imagine the difficulty we have when there are plenty of pay items and manually copy from the unfold
field and past onto the line?
How to fix it technically. I'd appreciate if you could kindly give me an idea on that?
Many thanks to all.
Kind Regards,
Ozgur

Hi,
Have you check in copy control order to invoice
At item level Pricing type it should be - G
Kapil

Restrict Bank Account payment exceeding specific amount

Hi Gurus,
I want to restrict my bank account to make payment only under specific amount say 5000 ETB.
I have given the minimum payment and maximum payment and outlay controls in bank account.
But when I am trying to create payment exceeding the Specified amount it just gives me Warning, if I click on yes it allows me to make payment.
Is there anyway I can stop the payment and it should not allow payment beyond 5000 etb.
Regards,
CP

Hello.
The system will let you continue processing the payment even when the payment amount exceeds the maximun outlay. As i said, the only way i know to avoid this is to use Forms Personalization (which is also a standard functionality of the system). There is no need to customize code.
Octavio

Order related billing for partial payment and inconsistent amounts

Hi,
We are using billing plans with payment cards to capture payments before goods are delivered. SAP doesn't seem to support credit cards for down payments, so we are entering the payment in the payment card and billing plan lines, then generating the F1 order-related billing.
Sometimes, the dollar amount is prorated proportionately, sometimes, it is disproportionately. For example, if we have 5 line items for $100, $200, $300, $400, $500 a total net value of $1500, and the customer makes a credit card payment of $500, we are seeing that sometimes this explodes to $33, 66, 99, 122, 155. Sometimes, it explodes to $0, $0, $0, $0, $500 in the billing document.
Where does SAP control the way the amounts are derived in the billing document? This is milestone billing.
Ideally, we would like this evenly applied across all conditions. I really need to understand how SAP handles this. The configuration indicates that the pricing is copied straight from the order. I don't see anything custom in the document copy procedure here.
I have had a difficult time finding anything in forums or on the internet in general, I've tried search terms such as "order related billing amount distribution" and "payment card amount allocation" as well as a few other terms but haven't found anything helpful.
Thanks for any suggestions you may have.

Hi,
Have you check in copy control order to invoice
At item level Pricing type it should be - G
Kapil

Payment scheme

Hi ,
Does we able to create ps for the QROB customer.

Please provide MUCH more information. Your post cannot be answered otherwise.

Payment Scheme - Extrapolation Amount

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for