Pb during synchronization of sequences

I'm currently using an Ipaq H3630 + Ms Visual Embedded C++ + Oracle 8i Lite Beta (4.1.1.0)
The schema is composed of two tables. each primary key is generated through a sequence. I've put a foreign key between the 2 tables.
The big pb I have is to write the Java code to synchronise my DB 8i Lite with the 8.1.7 DB.
I'm using Consolidator.CreateSequence("SQ_NAME") and CreateSequencePartition for each subscription.
The synchronization fails.
Does anyone have an experience with this kind a situation ?
Thanks for any help.
Olivier
null

hello,
I was trying to develop a SmartSync Application for AWT and followed the .
Probably I did something wrong. But I cannot find any relation between my Project and something Servlet-like.
Here is a list of
all packages my application uses:
com.sap.ip.me.api.persist.core
com.sap.ip.me.api.persist.query
com.sap.ip.me.api.runtime.awt
com.sap.ip.me.api.services
com.sap.ip.me.api.smartsync
java.awt
java.awt.event
java.util
regards
Andreas
Message was edited by: Andreas Göb
Added list of used packages

Similar Messages

CRM Genesys (G+ 7.5) addional fields during synchronization of call list.

Hello.
I have the requirement of sending additional fields to Genesys (G+ 7.5) during synchronization of call list.
Do you know if it is possible? I have searched for any documentation or similar topic and I haven't found any document.
Thank you in advanced.
JM

it can be done with the help of a system code 'sy-xcode'. it is initialised the time list is sorted so just keeping a check point, we can solve this problem.
Vishu Khandelwal

Warning: Problems occurred during synchronization of the system landscape

Hello
I have created systems in system landscape, TMS is working fine, all the configuration steps are completed successfully.
am working in Solution Manager 4, in project change -SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN - Project Administration - in 'System Landscape' tab  Change request and when I activate change request management I am getting following messages:
1. Warning: Problems occurred during synchronization of the system landscape
2. The project is not released. Hence cycle can not be created.
Its bit urgent as I m in middle of this activity, please assist me on the same
Thanks
Sharmishtha

Hello Jason & Prakhar
Thanks for your quick response. I am basis person, and configuring this change request management for one of the project.
Jason:
Will you please check with your basis person about these settings and let me know the same. I have set the settings as follows
C= Development (source system)
T = Quality
P = Production
Prakhar:
I have checked with all RFC connections are working fine, authorizations are also properly given.
I didnt get your point No correctly defined maintenance project exists, I have already created project in project administration transaction, assigned the system landscape, I have activated project IMG in IMG Project and then going in change request tab to activate the change request management, where its giving me above error.
More over, as you have mentioned I am getting following message in SLG1:
Project CHARM_GBW not found in the project administration table
This is asking me to do following things:
Synchronize the project in Change Manager with the Solution Manager. Call the Solution Manager with the transaction SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN, and go to the 'System Landscape' tab, and then the 'Project Cycle' tab. Select the 'Change Request Management' field, and choose 'Refresh'. Project CHARM_GBW should then be available.
Where do I have to make entry for this? I can see the entry in /TMWFLOW/PROJMAP table too. I dont know what more I need to do for this.
Problem is I cant see Project Cycle tab in System Landscape. Prakhar, frankly I am not able to find any step wise document on this part. So will you please help me with some documents on this? I am from technical side thus there is bit difficulty to understand this scenario from functional view.
I will be grateful for your help,
Thanks
Sharmishtha

Weird problem during synchronization !!!??

Hi all
I came accross a weird problem during synchronization. I am into customizing MAM2.5, and in testing phase. I created 600 local measurement documents and tried to sync. Nearly half of the documents got successfully posted at the back end and got deleted from the hand held. Nearly 250 documents were not posted and it stays in the hand held. On multiple synchronization also it is not getting moved but it says "synchronization successfully completed". The state in the upload syncBO (040) shows the state of these documents as "S" that corresponds to synchronized documents.
any of you had come accross this problem?? any thoughts??
Raj

Hi Raj,
Now that a new development, If the device was restarted manually please do a client data reset. Settings-> client data reset.
I know you have tried doing this before but I want you to check the following.
This will ensure that the data in the client and the middleware are consistent.
Check the MEREP_MON when you perform the first sync.
Download requests must be sent from the client to the middleware (They will be in I-Finished status after processing) and the response will be found in O-Waiting. When you perform the sync the second time all the data is sent to the client. Now the data in the client and the server are in-sync. Now if you change any data and sync the data should be sent to the middleware.
If it still doesnt work your only option is to reinstall MI on the device and start from scratch.
Let me know.
Best Regards,
Karthik

Does 2012 OSD get around requirements to get to the MP during the task sequence?

Currently right now I am working in an environment where we are on SCCM 2007, but will be going to 2012 next year. We are in the process of trying to make it so we can build on a secure network that cannot route to any other network. I am prepared to put
a DP out on this same network, but the problem I am running into is that during the task sequence starting, it downloads the task sequence from the MP, not the DP as it is not associated with the package. The MP is not on the same un-routable network. We will
need to have about 6 or so of these, so we do not want to setup 6 MP because now you are looking at not only 6 primary site licenses, but 6 SQL installs (Our environment will not let me get away with doing SQL express for support reasons) which adds up quickly.
Below is a link to exactly what I am speaking about:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/configurationmgr/archive/2009/04/16/configmgr-2007-primary-site-mp-is-used-for-the-task-sequence-even-when-deploying-osd-images-to-secondary-sites.aspx
What I am wondering is if SCCM 2012 OSD was structured differently in a way that access to the MP is no longer necessary during the task sequence process (say for example the task sequence xml is replicated to DPs too)?
Thanks.

My apologizes. I was meaning to say Primary, Secondary Sites. Not MPs. I brought this up to give reference to idea about the boundaries that I am going to have to use to prevent these clients from contacting DPs they they can't route to.
The idea behind getting off the build network and onto a prod is that security requirements from my companies Infosec require that we limit the amount of traffic on production networks. The idea is that the server be built on the build network, disconnected
and brought into prod. The whole time the MP would be the same, but the DP would switch based on the prod network they were brought into as DP will reside in these prod networks which will get flipped over by the boundary for the prod subnets. Once on the
prod network they would be able to contact the MP.
I would love to do stand-alone media, this is one of the first roads I started looking down as I have done them in the past for offline builds, but I need the machine to auto assign its hostname from a external servers that will script the build. The build
process we are trying to put into place will be started from an external website. My first thought was to have it add the machines to a collection and add a variable that would be turned into a task sequence variable during the TS and use it for the hostname
when it attempt to apply the Windows settings. The only way I think I could get this to work would be to write a script that is executed during the task sequence that would match the MAC address of the machine and assign the hostname by calling on another
share that is written to by the external website with the MAC and hostnames. The only problem that I cannot get around is that this build process needs to be fully automated and this is for both virtual and physical. I have no problems mounting a stand-alone
build ISO using a script for VMWare, but the problem starts when I look at the physical and limitations of scripting for both iLo and iDRAC for performing this step. iLo can be done, but iDRAC is limited.
As for a reverse-proxy I will not be able to look at that. They have specific requirements against using reverse-proxies in only specific situations and this it not allowed. I got turned down on this one. This requirement is created by a federal regulation
my company has to follow.

Warning: Problems occurred during synchronization in Charm with virtual sys

Hi Team
I have configured charm with virtual system --(Dev>V01>V02>) as client specific STMS , Where V01 is Quality and V02 is production system; When I do consistency check from solar_project_admin tcode for project created, it shows no errors ;
but when i try to activate the charma and click on "refresh" button , it throws following error
"Warning: Problems occurred during synchronization" ;I have checked the logs in SLG1 for object "/TMWFLOW/CMSCV" ; but
there are no errors except warnings for BC Sets , Can you pl guide what might have gone wrong ?
All the RFC's are working fine and there is no authorization issue in solution manager.
Thanks
Swati

hi,
for the CTS activation you must do all the below,
1. SMSY --> landscape creation
2. RFC Creations
3. Client Specific TMS configuration
4. Prj --> CTS activation.
go through the below doc,
[https://websmp209.sap-ag.de/sapdownload/011000358700000657692007E/eCTS_ChaRM_SP12.pdf|https://websmp209.sap-ag.de/sapdownload/011000358700000657692007E/eCTS_ChaRM_SP12.pdf]
jansi

SSL peer shut down incorrectly during synchronization

Why during synchronization process, particularly when downloading the war file I get this message? Is there a timeout connection to set?
The entire app war is about 6mb. At downloading point, the interrupt occurs when the war file reaches 3 or 4 mb.
The downloading bit rate is about 30KBps.
I use a wireless connection for my device, but the behavior is the same using a wired connection.
An Exception (javax.net.ssl.SSLException) occurred while http-get: SSL peer shut down incorrectly
[20070327 14:14:45:994] D [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEventListener com.sap.ip.me.core.RegistryInboundProcessingLog$RegistryInboundProcessingLogSyncEventListener@78dc4c was registered for key com.sap.ip.me.core.RegistryInboundProcessingLog$RegistryInboundProcessingLogSyncEventListener/MI2853484152454429
[20070327 14:14:45:994] E [AppLog/MI/Deployment ] Exception while trying to install application DSA_MOBILE_CLIENT_0_9_26
com.sap.ip.me.core.InstallationException: Cannot download installation file
at com.sap.ip.me.core.JspApplicationType.downloadInstallationFile(JspApplicationType.java:387)
at com.sap.ip.me.core.JspApplicationType.install(JspApplicationType.java:56)
at com.sap.ip.me.core.ApplicationManager.installApplication(ApplicationManager.java:763)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.installApplicationFromMSD(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:898)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.installMSDs(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:868)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.startApplicationInstallation(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:836)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.startInstallationViaMSD(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:416)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.process(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:194)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSingleContainer(SyncManagerImpl.java:175)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger.processInboundContainers(SyncManagerMerger.java:168)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSyncCycle(SyncManagerImpl.java:898)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.syncForUser(SyncManagerImpl.java:1340)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSynchronization(SyncManagerImpl.java:971)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:463)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:319)
at com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncManager.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManager.java:79)
at com.sap.ip.me.apps.jsp.Home$SyncRunnable.run(Home.java:641)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
[20070327 14:14:45:994] E [MI/Deployment ] com.sap.ip.me.core.InstallationException: Cannot download installation file
com.sap.ip.me.core.InstallationException: Cannot download installation file
at com.sap.ip.me.core.JspApplicationType.downloadInstallationFile(JspApplicationType.java:387)
at com.sap.ip.me.core.JspApplicationType.install(JspApplicationType.java:56)
at com.sap.ip.me.core.ApplicationManager.installApplication(ApplicationManager.java:763)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.installApplicationFromMSD(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:898)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.installMSDs(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:868)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.startApplicationInstallation(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:836)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.startInstallationViaMSD(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:416)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.process(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:194)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSingleContainer(SyncManagerImpl.java:175)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger.processInboundContainers(SyncManagerMerger.java:168)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSyncCycle(SyncManagerImpl.java:898)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.syncForUser(SyncManagerImpl.java:1340)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSynchronization(SyncManagerImpl.java:971)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:463)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:319)
at com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncManager.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManager.java:79)
at com.sap.ip.me.apps.jsp.Home$SyncRunnable.run(Home.java:641)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)

hi alex,
are you downloading the apps thru ssl? your ssl server might have a timeout...
you can check on your server settings for this. or you can try placing your app
in an http server. if you are using a proxy server, might need to check on the
timeout settings as well.
regards
jo

Installing "Applications" during the task sequence and installation enforcement

Hello,
Kind of a weird question here, so it seems like I'm seeing that if you install an application on a system during its OSD task sequence, then you later manually uninstall that application, that SCCM considers that system now out of compliance?
And then reinstalls the application as indicated in AppEnforce.log? Is this true? If so, how do you get around this behavior? I guess I thought that this application compliance only took effect when you actually deploy an application to a
system, through an actual deployment. I didn't realize that it would enforce compliance even if an application was installed during a task sequence. So if you have hundreds of systems that were imaged with the same task sequence and you have
a small handful of machines that can't have application X on it (so you want to uninstall it), which was installed via the task sequence, how do you disable this compliance enforcement and disable its automatic reinstall?
Thanks for any help you can provide.

Sorry for the delayed response, thank you both for your input. To answer both your questions, no these workstations do not have any required deployments for this application directed at them. I have confirmed that, however, they do have
the OSD task sequence deployment (that contains this application) constantly "available" to them (via only "media and PXE") as this makes it very easy for our technicians to reimage any machine whenever they need to (love that feature
by the way).
I can only assume that because they still have this task sequence deployment pointed at them is why they continue to attempt to reinstall this application when ConfigMgr finds that it's not installed anymore. In fact it does it at the same day/time
each week, which I believe is the same day/time of the week that the machines were imaged. I must have the compliance part of the clients configuration to check every 7 days for stuff like this? Anyway, that's my conclusion for now.
Since even Wally Mead felt that this must be an actual required deployment outside of the task sequence I'm really curious to see if anyone else sees this behavior. It would be fairly simple to attempt to recreate, image a machine with a task sequence
that has "application" installs included, where the deployment for it is just "available" and keep the deployment "available" after the machine is reimaged. Then after that, uninstall one of the apps that was installed
during the task sequence via an "application" and then see if it reinstalls automatically, it may wait a while (may 7 days by default?). You can see the evidence of our application reinstalling itself in the "AppEnforce.log".
Is it even remotely possible that this is a new "feature" or behavior of ConfigMgr 2012 and "Applications"?

Nvidia (Quadro K2000) Driver isn't installed during OSD (Task Sequence succeeded) - HP Z620

Hi everyone,
I have added a driverset (HP Z620) in SCCM for the first time using our internal procedure (Importing Drivers to SCCM, Create Driver package with specific category, apply driver package in TS using WMI to query for the model).
The Task Sequence succeeded, but the NVIDIA K2000 Graphics driver isn't installed (only HD Graphics 4000 driver).
Looking at the drivers in the Driver Package, this should normally apply since the driver is compatible with this specific GPU.
At the forums, I can see that some people have created a seperate package for the GPU driver installation using command line switches.. But looking at the environment at the customer, we have never done this and in the past, we have succesfully installed
the driver for this GPU before.
PS: The driver for the GPU in my new driver package (HP Z620) isn't the same as for previous models (HP Z220, Z230, Z600).
Could you please advise me what to do? Should I have added something in the driver sources before importing the driver to SCCM?
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards

Hi
I m installing Nvidia (Quadro K2000) Driver during OSD (Task Sequence succeeded) - HP Z420
Remove the Graphics driver for NVIDIA from the current driver database
Added below task in the existing task sequence as invidual installation based on the Condition (WMI query)
Command Line
HP_Z420_Graphics_x64\Win64_332_50\setup.exe -s -k -clean -noeula
This will install the desired driver and related configurable components
WMI Query
select * from win32_ComputerSystem where manufacturer like '%hewlett%' and model like '%z420%'
Currently I m looking out for the Errors codes needed to add to this task . Success codes 3010 and 0 already added

Extremely slow login hanging during synchronization

Hi,
I have several clients all working quite happily with mobile accounts but one user is experiencing excessive login times. The home dir is around 6-7GB in size with a decent 100x connection to the server. This used to work fine then one day (with no obvious changes made) login started hanging during synchronization. It hangs while scanning for differences before even getting to downloading/uploading new or modified files. I checked what files it stuck on and tried removing them but it just started hanging on other files. I also tested network connections and tried logging in on another machine but with no joy. I suspect there is a cache or preference that is corrupt but I'm not sure where/which one. Can anyone suggest anything?
Thanks in advance.

I have the same issue - but I am just using portable home directories. It only affects 1 user (out of 12) - and their login process takes up to 2-3 minutes - whereas everyone else is lightning fast (<10 seconds). I have repaired permissions on the server using disk utility. I don't know what else to try though.

During synchronization lost internet

During synchronization with iCloud I lost internet connection. Later I tried to synchronize again, but it doesn't upload the rest of the photos on my iPhone. I'm worries, cause the computer and my old device are lost. But I want my photos back
I don't know, can i just restart my device without loosing those photos

Have you tried to to turn off photo stream for a moment and then to tun it back on again (Settings > iCloud > Photos > My Photo Stream)? Sometimes this helps to refresh the sync process.

Users getting disabled during Synchronization

Hi All,
We are running Plumtree 5.0.2 in Windows Environment under Tomcat and also used Sample Application "Auth_HelloWorld-Java" as the base and modified it as per the current needs for Authentication and Synchronization. When I run the Synchronization under "Partial Users Synchronization" all the groups and users get imported correctly for the first time. When it is run again the users which were imported during the first run gets disabled automatically and they need to be enabled manually. This is putting us under lots of issues as the number of users are getting more.
Please do let me know how this can be solved.
Thanks , Raghu

Raghu,
I appologize for the delayed response, our notification seem to have been down over the weekend.
In so far as the problems you are having, the only reason that the users would get disabled is that they are not members of a group in the "Fully Synchronized Group List". This list is in the Authentication Source Editor, and should contain the groups from your remote Authentication Source that should be synchronized with the portal. Only users that are members of a group specified in that list will be imported.
Do you have any groups choosen?
Thanks,Akash

Whats the best way to apply office updates during OSD task sequence with Software Update Agent disabled?

I am trying to update office via the SCCM 2012 R2 OSD task sequence. I know offline updating only updates the core components in the WIM and I'm trying to figure out how to add office updates as well. I am aware of using powershell to try and kick off
a WU scan as seen here:
http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2012/01/24/use-powershell-commands-to-assist-with-patching-during-sccm-image-build/
But the kicker is we don't use SCCM to update the workstations (Solo WSUS install). Is there a way to do this (maybe set the client in the TS to switch on SUP, then off again when it goes off into production) rather than have to build a new image every month?

You could use the ZTI_WindowsUpdates.wsf script from MDT.
http://scriptimus.wordpress.com/2012/03/22/mdt-2012-automating-updates-in-lite-touch-deployments/
How does it work?
The task sequence steps run a script called ZTIWindowsUpdate.wsf. The script uses the
Windows Update Agent API to manage the downloading and installation of updates. All audit information is written to the
ZTIWindowsUpdate.log file. If you find any unusual error codes in your log returned from the API (although I never have) you can compare the codes
here. The script will also check and update the
Windows Update Agent(WUA) as needed at the start.
In its default state, the ZTIWindowsUpdate.wsf script will connect to Microsoft Update then search for and download all available updates including Security Patches, Drivers, Browser Updates and Service Packs. This is essentially the same
as opening the GUI and selecting check for updates.
Daniel Ratliff | http://www.PotentEngineer.com

Calibration Executive error during PXI-5610 sequence.

When running the PXI-5610 procedure in Calibration Executive, I get the prompt "NI-FGEN Create Arbitrary Waveform - Cannot write Real data when Data Processing Mode is Complex. Disable OSP or set Data Processing Mode to Real." The procedure the errors out with the same message when I click 'Continue'. I am using the NI PXI-5441 AWG (in place of the NI PXI-5421), but it is a selectable source during the initial configuration of the sequence.
Am I missing something? Am I doing something wrong? Is there a hiccup in the Calibration Executive software when PXI-5441 is selected?
Any help would be appreciated.

Hi DaRock,
We do not recommend making any changes to any of the test code for calibration as these may cause problems in your test sequence. We are still currently looking into the issue, however, in the meantime, if you would like to try and experiment some changes in the test code, please make sure to backup any original versions of the files you edit so you can load them back in they cause any problems.
Just for your information, in a standard NI-FGEN application, you can manually disable OSP by accessing the OSP Enabled property from the NI-Fgen property node under Arbitrary Waveform Output»Onboard Signal Processing.
Regards,
S_Hong
National Instruments
Applications Engineer

Install Software Updates fails (timeouts) during OSD Task Sequence

Hi
As one of the lasts steps in our OSD Task Sequence we have an "Install Software Update" step where "Mandatory Software Updates" is choosen. It worked a week ago, but now the step fails with error code 0x800705B4
(This operation returned because the timeout period expired.)
When examining the WindowsUpdate.log I see an error followed by several minutes without log activity:
2014-02-18 10:39:13:874
416 b74
Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
2014-02-18 10:39:13:874
416 b74
Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
2014-02-18 10:39:13:874
416 b74
Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
2014-02-18 10:39:13:999
1632 4e4
COMAPI - Updates found = 260
2014-02-18 10:39:13:999
1632 4e4
COMAPI ---------
2014-02-18 10:39:13:999
1632 4e4
COMAPI -- END -- COMAPI: Search [ClientId = CcmExec]
2014-02-18 10:39:13:999
1632 4e4
COMAPI -------------
2014-02-18 10:39:18:835
416 b74
Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
2014-02-18 11:08:12:225
416 4dc
AU AU received policy change subscription event
2014-02-18 11:08:12:334
416 4dc
AU AU Options changed from policy.
2014-02-18 11:08:12:334
416 4dc
AU Successfully wrote event for AU health state:0
2014-02-18 11:08:12:334
416 4dc
AU ########### AU: Policy change processed ###########
When examining the WUAHadler.log - again there is no log activity during the Software Update step.
Its a WSUS Update Source type ({DCA8EDB2-927C-42AC-9D2E-3D98C3BC3759}), adding it.
WUAHandler 18-02-2014 10:39:05
2016 (0x07E0)
Existing WUA Managed server was already set (http://<servername>:8530), skipping Group Policy registration.
WUAHandler 18-02-2014 10:39:05
2016 (0x07E0)
Added Update Source ({DCA8EDB2-927C-42AC-9D2E-3D98C3BC3759}) of content type: 2
WUAHandler 18-02-2014 10:39:05
2016 (0x07E0)
Scan results will include all superseded updates.
WUAHandler 18-02-2014 10:39:05
2016 (0x07E0)
Search Criteria is (DeploymentAction=* AND Type='Software') OR (DeploymentAction=* AND Type='Driver')
WUAHandler 18-02-2014 10:39:05
2016 (0x07E0)
Async searching of updates using WUAgent started.
WUAHandler 18-02-2014 10:39:05
2016 (0x07E0)
Async searching completed. WUAHandler
18-02-2014 10:39:13 1108 (0x0454)
Successfully completed scan. WUAHandler
18-02-2014 10:39:15 2016 (0x07E0)
Removed Update Source ({DCA8EDB2-927C-42AC-9D2E-3D98C3BC3759}) of content type: 2
WUAHandler 18-02-2014 11:06:25
1160 (0x0488)
CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3;
for bundles WUAHandler
18-02-2014 11:09:25 2232 (0x08B8)
The Software Update Step started at 10:27 and the timeout came at 11:05.
Any ideas why the step times out? Or which logs I should look at?
Regards,
FC

PolicyEvaluator.log:
No errors. The last event is:
Received notification that Local policy has changed.
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 19-02-2014 10:51:11
1692 (0x069C)
Raising event:
instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_SettingsEvaluationComplete
ClientID = "GUID:C2E937AA-CF24-420F-AD81-E8CEADBD7649";
DateTime = "20140219095123.565000+000";
PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\root\\ccm\\policy\\machine\\actualconfig";
ProcessID = 1748;
ThreadID = 1768;
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
19-02-2014 10:51:23 1768 (0x06E8)
Forcing settings update for local policy change.
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 19-02-2014 10:51:23
2900 (0x0B54)
Updating settings in \\.\root\ccm\policy\machine\actualconfig
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 19-02-2014 10:51:33
2900 (0x0B54)
Raising event:
instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_SettingsEvaluationComplete
ClientID = "GUID:C2E937AA-CF24-420F-AD81-E8CEADBD7649";
DateTime = "20140219095144.641000+000";
PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\root\\ccm\\policy\\machine\\actualconfig";
ProcessID = 1748;
ThreadID = 2900;
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
19-02-2014 10:51:44 2900 (0x0B54)
UpdatesHandler.log:
No errors. A couple of lines:
Successfully initiated scan. UpdatesHandler
19-02-2014 10:54:10 1768 (0x06E8)
Updates scan completion received, result = 0x0.
UpdatesHandler 19-02-2014 10:55:23
3572 (0x0DF4)
UpdatesStore.log
No errors. Just quering updates, and the last line:
Querying update status completed successfully.
UpdatesStore 19-02-2014 10:56:27
3300 (0x0CE4)
In the smsts.log I found an interesting thing:
Successfully initiated RefreshUpdates operation
InstallSWUpdate 19-02-2014 10:51:37
3424 (0x0D60)
Waiting for RefreshUpdates complete notification from Updates Deployment Agent
InstallSWUpdate 19-02-2014 10:51:37
3424 (0x0D60)
FALSE, HRESULT=800705b4 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\client\osdeployment\installswupdate\installswupdate.cpp,1273)
InstallSWUpdate 19-02-2014 11:21:37
3424 (0x0D60)
Timedout waiting for updates refresh complete notification
InstallSWUpdate 19-02-2014 11:21:37
3424 (0x0D60)
It times out after exactly 30 minutes. Does 2012 have the same "feature" as 2007? (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2009754/da)
Still the last event in windowsupdate.log is:
2014-02-19 10:55:37:251
324 dd0
Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
Regards,
FC

Pb during synchronization of sequences

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for