Perform action on set of rows

Is there a way with 2008 r2 to perform an action based o as set of rows highlighted in the Excel pivot table. Say for example the end user wants to drill through on three rows in a pivot table that all share a common attribute value. Can they
somehow specify those three rows and perform an action?
John Schroeder

Hi Jschroeder,
According to your description, you want to set the action on the rows which share a common attribute value, in this case, the action is dynamically base on the values, right? In SQL Server Analysis Services, an action is an end user-initiated operation upon
a selected cube or portion of a cube. The operation can start an application with the selected item as a parameter, or it can retrieve information about the selected item. The action was defined at the cube design time. So I am afraid you requirement cannot
be done currently.
If I have anything misunderstood, please point it out.
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

How to set fire action event for particular rows in a table

HI All,
I have a requirement in which I want to set fire action event for particular rows in a table based on some condition.
The table has columns like fullname,employee id etc.
So i want to set fire action event for particulars rows only which will saisfy some condition.

Atanu,
Your approach(setting fire action for few rows) seems not possible. Better to go ahead with workaround.
Do you want this functionality in processRequest(while page loading) or processFromRequest(on some event) method ? Give more explanation regd. your requirement ?
In either case loop through the rows and when your condition is met write the action to be performed in controller.
Regards,
Anand

Large Set of Rows - Performance

Hello all.
We do have a report (Apex 3.2), where if no filter is defined, loads about 60.000 lines. Running the same query on sqlplus or Sql Developer, the performance is acceptable, but on Apex, it takes several minutes, causing some users to abort (close the browser and try again, and aborting again). This behaviour is causing extreme CPU and disk workload. Temp tablespace sometimes gets 100% full to (2GB!!!).
It is not an option to tell them to make some selection before submiting the page for 2 reasons: sometimes they forget it and sometimes they just do not want to do it, because they argue that "on Oracle Forms it was really quick".
Are there any suggestions to this situation? It is causing some requests to go back to Oracle Forms 6i...
Thanks in advance.

Query is :
select a.SUP_CHAMADO_ID,
a.SUP_CLIENTE,
a.CONTATO,
a.DDD_TELEFONE,
a.SUP_TECNICO,
a.NOME_TECNICO,
a.SUP_SISTEMA,
a.ABERTURA,
a.SUP_SITUACAO,
a.SITUACAO,
a.NOME_CLIENTE,
a.NOME_SISTEMA,
a.SUP_CLIENTE_ID,
a.Tolerancia_Atendimento,
SubStr(a.Diagnostico, 1, 60) Diagnostico,
SubStr(a.Solucao, 1, 60) Solucao,
case when Tolerancia_Atendimento < 0 then 'red'
when Tolerancia_Atendimento >= 0 then 'black'
end the_color,
case when Tolerancia_Atendimento < 0 then 'bold'
when Tolerancia_Atendimento >= 0 then 'plain'
end the_style
From SUP_CHAMADOS_VW a
WHERE
instr(upper(To_Char(a.SUP_CHAMADO_ID)),upper(nvl(:P2_SEARCH_REPORT, To_Char(a.Sup_Chamado_Id)))) > 0 Or
instr(upper(a.CONTATO),upper(nvl(:P2_SEARCH_REPORT, a.CONTATO))) > 0 Or
instr(upper(a.DDD_TELEFONE),upper(nvl(:P2_SEARCH_REPORT, a.DDD_TELEFONE))) > 0 Or instr(upper(a.FINALIDADE),upper(nvl(:P2_SEARCH_REPORT, a.FINALIDADE))) > 0
Or instr(upper(SubStr(a.DIAGNOSTICO, 1, 4000)),upper(nvl(:P2_SEARCH_REPORT, SubStr(a.DIAGNOSTICO, 1, 4000)))) > 0
Or instr(upper(SubStr(a.DIAGNOSTICO, 1, 4000)),upper(nvl(:P2_SEARCH_REPORT, SubStr(a.DIAGNOSTICO, 1, 4000)))) > 0) And
a.SUP_CLIENTE = DECODE(Nvl(:P2_SUP_CLIENTES, 'ALL'), 'ALL', a.SUP_CLIENTE, :P2_SUP_CLIENTES) And
Nvl(a.SUP_SISTEMA, 'ALL') = DECODE(Nvl(:P2_SUP_SISTEMAS, 'ALL'), 'ALL', Nvl(a.SUP_SISTEMA, 'ALL'), Nvl(:P2_SUP_SISTEMAS, 'ALL')) And
To_Char(a.SUP_SITUACAO) = DECODE(Nvl(To_Char(:P2_SUP_SITUACOES), '0'), '0', To_Char(a.SUP_SITUACAO), To_Char(:P2_SUP_SITUACOES)) And
Nvl(a.SUP_TECNICO, 'ALL') = DECODE(Nvl(:P2_SUP_TECNICOS, 'ALL'), 'ALL', Nvl(a.SUP_TECNICO, 'ALL'), Nvl(:P2_SUP_TECNICOS, 'ALL')) And
a.SUP_DATA >= DECODE(:P2_PERIODO, 'A', TRUNC(SYSDATE) - 10,
'B', TRUNC(SYSDATE) - 30,
'C', TRUNC(SYSDATE) - 180,
'D', TO_DATE('01/01/1900', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
The main problem is: it does not start to show the results quickly as does in Forms 6i.
Pagination now is set at Row Ranges 1-15 16-30 in select list (with pagination).
Thanks

ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables

hi,
I am loading data from source table to target table in a interface.
Using LKM incremental update .
In the merge rows step , getting the below error.
30926 : 99999 : java.sql.SQLException: ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables
please help as what should be done to resolve this.

Below is the query in the merge step...
when i run from SQL also, same error
SQL Error: ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables
30926. 00000 - "unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables"
*Cause:    A stable set of rows could not be got because of large dml
activity or a non-deterministic where clause.
*Action:   Remove any non-deterministic where clauses and reissue the dml.
merge into     TFR.INVENTORIES T
using     TFR.I$_INVENTORIES S
on     (
          T.ORGANIZATION_ID=S.ORGANIZATION_ID
     and          T.ITEM_ID=S.ITEM_ID
when matched
then update set
     T.ITEM_TYPE     = S.ITEM_TYPE,
     T.SEGMENT1     = S.SEGMENT1,
     T.DESCRIPTION     = S.DESCRIPTION,
     T.LIST_PRICE_PER_UNIT     = S.LIST_PRICE_PER_UNIT,
     T.CREATED_BY     = S.CREATED_BY,
     T.DEFAULT_SO_SOURCE_TYPE     = S.DEFAULT_SO_SOURCE_TYPE,
     T.MATERIAL_BILLABLE_FLAG     = S.MATERIAL_BILLABLE_FLAG,
     T.LAST_UPDATED_BY     = S.LAST_UPDATED_BY
     ,T.ID     = TFR.INVENTORIES_SEQ.NEXTVAL,
     T.CREATION_DATE     = CURRENT_DATE,
     T.LAST_UPDATE_DATE     = CURRENT_DATE
when not matched
then insert
     T.ORGANIZATION_ID,
     T.ITEM_ID,
     T.ITEM_TYPE,
     T.SEGMENT1,
     T.DESCRIPTION,
     T.LIST_PRICE_PER_UNIT,
     T.CREATED_BY,
     T.DEFAULT_SO_SOURCE_TYPE,
     T.MATERIAL_BILLABLE_FLAG,
     T.LAST_UPDATED_BY
     ,T.ID,
     T.CREATION_DATE,
     T.LAST_UPDATE_DATE
values
     S.ORGANIZATION_ID,
     S.ITEM_ID,
     S.ITEM_TYPE,
     S.SEGMENT1,
     S.DESCRIPTION,
     S.LIST_PRICE_PER_UNIT,
     S.CREATED_BY,
     S.DEFAULT_SO_SOURCE_TYPE,
     S.MATERIAL_BILLABLE_FLAG,
     S.LAST_UPDATED_BY
     ,TFR.INVENTORIES_SEQ.NEXTVAL,
     CURRENT_DATE,
     CURRENT_DATE
     )

Ability to perform ALTER SESSION SET SQL TRACE but not all alter clauses

I see that in order to run the ALTER SESSION SET SQL TRACE command, the user should be explicitly granted alter session privilege as the CREATE SESSION privilege alone is not enough. Is there a way to grant the ability to perform ALTER SESSION SET SQL TRACE but not the other clauses such as GUARD, PARALLEL & RESUMABLE?.
Thanks
Sathya

If you are using Oracle 10g and above, you can use DBMS_SESSION.session_trace_enable procedure,
it doesn't require alter session system privilege.
Simple example:
SQL> connect test/test@//192.168.1.2:1521/xe
Connected.
SQL> alter session set tracefile_identifier='my_id';
Session altered.
SQL> alter session set sql_trace = true
2 ;
alter session set sql_trace = true
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
SQL> execute dbms_session.session_trace_enable;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select * from user_sys_privs;
USERNAME                 PRIVILEGE                    ADM
TEST                      CREATE PROCEDURE                NO
TEST                      CREATE TABLE                    NO
TEST                      CREATE SEQUENCE                    NO
TEST                      CREATE TRIGGER                    NO
TEST                      SELECT ANY DICTIONARY               NO
TEST                      CREATE SYNONYM                    NO
TEST                      UNLIMITED TABLESPACE               NO
7 rows selected.
SQL> execute dbms_session.session_trace_disable;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> disconnect
Disconnected from Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Productionand here is result from tkprof:
TKPROF: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on So Paź 23 00:53:07 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Trace file: xe_ora_176_my_id.trc
( ---- cut ---- )
select *
from
user_sys_privs
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.08       0.08          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        2      0.01       0.01          0         15          0           7
total        4      0.09       0.09          0         15          0           7
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 61
Rows     Row Source Operation
      7 HASH GROUP BY (cr=15 pr=0 pw=0 time=11494 us)
      7   CONCATENATION (cr=15 pr=0 pw=0 time=4913 us)
      0    MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN (cr=4 pr=0 pw=0 time=1169 us)
      0     NESTED LOOPS (cr=4 pr=0 pw=0 time=793 us)
      0      TABLE ACCESS FULL SYSAUTH$ (cr=4 pr=0 pw=0 time=592 us)
      0      INDEX RANGE SCAN I_SYSTEM_PRIVILEGE_MAP (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)(object id 312)
      0     BUFFER SORT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      0      TABLE ACCESS FULL USER$ (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      7    NESTED LOOPS (cr=11 pr=0 pw=0 time=3429 us)
      9     HASH JOIN (cr=9 pr=0 pw=0 time=2705 us)
      9      TABLE ACCESS FULL SYSAUTH$ (cr=4 pr=0 pw=0 time=512 us)
     63      TABLE ACCESS FULL USER$ (cr=5 pr=0 pw=0 time=914 us)
      7     INDEX RANGE SCAN I_SYSTEM_PRIVILEGE_MAP (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=510 us)(object id 312)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait Total Waited
----------------------------------------   Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client                       2        0.00          0.00
SQL*Net message from client                     2       20.64         20.65
BEGIN dbms_session.session_trace_disable; END;
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.01       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           1
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.01       0.00          0          0          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 61

LOV switcher and set current Row

Hi
I have a LOV switcher attached to one of the columns in the view object.
It works fine while switching the LOV's in mostly all conditions.
But its failing for one case.
We are using checkboxex to select a row , and do a operation in the row.
To do this, the button on which the operation is performed ...
1)we have checked which row has the transient value of check box as checked
2) Set the current row of the iterator to the row that comes from the selected check box index..
3) Called the operation.
But as the code go to step two and the current row is set to the required row, all the LOV 's in all the rows start showing the Default LOV which is selected in the LOV switcher, if i do a f5 fr the page, the original values are restored.
Also if the VO fecth size is 25 , it gives wrong value for 25 rows, if i scroll through the table again it automatically shows the correct value.
This has been taking a lot of out time to debug the issue.
I guess its somethng to do with LOV switcher , set current row and the table getting refreshed incorrectly on set current row

Hi Timo ,
Thanks fr the reply..
Jdev 11.1.1.4
Code for checkbox selection
DCBindingContainer dcbindings =
(DCBindingContainer)BindingContext.getCurrent().getCurrentBindingsEntry();
DCIteratorBinding iterator =
dcbindings.findIteratorBinding(iteratorName);
Row[] rowSet = iterator.getAllRowsInRange();
Integer selectCount = 0;
for (Row row : rowSet) {
Object selAtt = row.getAttribute(selectAttribName);
if (selAtt != null && (Boolean)selAtt == true) {
System.out.println("Row selected");
selectCount++;
if (selectCount > 1) {
System.out.println("More than one row selected!");
throw new ValidationException("More than one row selected");
else{
iterator.setCurrentRowWithKey(row.getKey().toStringFormat(true));
} else {System.out.println("Row not selected");}
I actually sorted the issue out
had to write
iterator.refresh(Row.REFRESH_CONTAINEES); after iterator.setCurrentRowWithKey(row.getKey().toStringFormat(true));
But not sure if thts correct ...

MERGE Statement - unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables

OWB Client: 10.1.0.2.0
OWB Repository: 10.1.0.1.0
I am trying to create a MERGE in OWB.
I get the following error:
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P004 ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables
I have read the other posts regarding this and can't seem to get a fix.
The target table has a unique index on the field that I am matching on.
The "incoming" data doesn't have a unique index, but I have checked and confirmed that it is unique on the appropriate key.
The "incoming" data is created by a join and filter in the mapping and I'd rather avoid having to load this data into a new table and add a unique index on this.
Any help would be great.
Thanks
Laura

Hello Laura,
The MERGE statement does not require any constraints on its target table or source table. The only requirement is that two input rows cannot update the same target row, meaning that all existing target rows can be matched by at most one input row (otherwise the MERGE would be undeterministic since you don't know which of the input rows you would end up with in the target).
If a table takes ages to load (and is not really big) I suspect that your mapping is not running in set mode and that it performs a full table scan on source data for each target row it produces.
If you ARE running in set mode you should run explain plan to get a hint on what is wrong.
Regarding your original mapping, try to set the target operator property:
Match by constraint=no constraints
and then check the Loading properties on each target column.
Regards, Hans Henrik

Set specific rows in ALV grid ready for input

Hi everyone,
I have a question about how to set specific rows in ALV grid ready for input.
I know that I can make some columns ready for input before the ALV displayed,but I have no idea how to make specific rows displayed in the ALV ready for input.

Hello Aaron
For editable columns we can use the fieldcatalog (LVC_S_FCAT-EDIT = 'X') but for rows you need to define editability on cell level.
The required steps are documented in sample report BCALV_EDIT_02. Below I point out a few crucial points:
*§1.Extend your output table for a field, e.g., CELLTAB, that holds
*   information about the edit status of each cell for the
*   corresponding row (the table type is SORTED!).
DATA: BEGIN OF gt_outtab occurs 0. "with header line
        include structure sflight.
DATA: celltab type LVC_T_STYL.
DATA: END OF gt_outtab.
*§3.Provide the fieldname of the celltab field by using field
*   STYLEFNAME of the layout structure.
   gs_layout-stylefname = 'CELLTAB'.
   CALL METHOD grid1->set_table_for_first_display
         EXPORTING i_structure_name = 'SFLIGHT'
                   is_layout        = gs_layout
         CHANGING it_outtab        = gt_outtab[].
Note: in the sample report only field SEATSMAX is editable. In your case you need
to fill CELLTAB for all fields in a row.
*§2.After selecting data, set edit status for each row in a loop
*   according to field SEATSMAX.
LOOP AT gt_outtab.
    l_index = sy-tabix.
    refresh lt_celltab.
    if gt_outtab-seatsmax ge 300.
        perform fill_celltab using 'RW'
                             changing lt_celltab.
    else.
        perform fill_celltab using 'RO'
                             changing lt_celltab.
    endif.
*§2c.Copy your celltab to the celltab of the current row of gt_outtab.
    INSERT LINES OF lt_celltab INTO TABLE gt_outtab-celltab.
    MODIFY gt_outtab INDEX l_index.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM.                               " SELECT_DATA_AND_INIT_STYLE
NOTE: LVC_T_STYL is a SORTED table type. Thus, take care that you are using the
INSERT ... INTO TABLE statement and not APPEND (because then nothing is appended
to the CELLTAB itab).
IF p_mode EQ 'RW'.
*§2a.Use attribute CL_GUI_ALV_GRID=>MC_STYLE_ENABLED to set a cell
*    to status "editable".
    l_mode = cl_gui_alv_grid=>mc_style_enabled.
ELSE. "p_mode eq 'RO'
*§2b.Use attribute CL_GUI_ALV_GRID=>MC_STYLE_DISABLED to set a cell
*    to status "non-editable".
    l_mode = cl_gui_alv_grid=>mc_style_disabled.
ENDIF.
ls_celltab-fieldname = 'SEATSMAX'.
ls_celltab-style = cl_gui_alv_grid=>mc_style_disabled.
INSERT ls_celltab INTO TABLE pt_celltab.
Regards
Uwe

Dynamic action with set value on date field

Hi,
I'm using APEX 4.02
I'm trying to calculate the age based on the date of birth dynamically on a form. I'm trying to do this with a (advanced)dynamic action with set value.
I'm able to get this kind of action working based on a number field etc, but NEVER on a date field.
I've read all posts on this subject but so far no solution. Even if I try to simply copy the value over to another date field or typecast it to a string ( to_char function ) it does not work. So for me the problem seems to be in the source field being a date field.
I've tried using the source value as is in a select statement :
select :P33_GEBOORTEDATUM from dual;
and also type casted based on the date format :
select TO_DATE(:P33_GEBOORTEDATUM,'DD-MON-YYYY') from dual
but still no luck.
On the same form I don't have any issues as long as the calculation is based on number fields, but as soon as I start using dates all goes wrong.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. If you need any extra info just let me know.
Cheers
Bas
b.t.w My application default date format is DD-MON-YYYY, maybe this has something to do with the issue .... ?
Edited by: user3338841 on 3-apr-2011 7:33

Hi,
Create a dynamic action named "set age" with following values.
Event: Change
Selection Type: Item(s)
Item(s): P1_DATE_OF_BIRTH
Action: Set value
Fire on page load: TRUE
Set Type: PL/SQL Expression
PL/SQL Expression: ROUND( (SYSDATE - :P1_DATE_OF_BIRTH)/365.24,0)
Page items to submit: P1_DATE_OF_BIRTH
Selection Type: Item(s)
Item(s): P1_AGE
Regards,
Kartik Patel
http://patelkartik.blogspot.com/
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=9904351712:1

Performance degradation after setting filesystemio_option=setall from none.

Hi All,
We have facing performance degradation after setting filesystemio_option=setall from none on my two servers as mentioned below.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 7) 2.6.9 55.ELhugemem (32-bit)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.2 (Tikanga) 2.6.18 92.1.10.el5 (64-bit)
We are seeing lots of Disk I/O happening. We expected "*filesystemio_option=setall* " will improve performance but it is degrading. We getting slowness complains.
Please let me know do we need to set somethign else along with this ...like any otimizer parameter( e.g. optimizer_index_cost_adj, optimizer_index_caching).
Please help.

Hi Suraj,
<speculation>
You switched filesystemio_options to setall from none, so, the most likely reason for performance degradation after switching to setall is the implementation of directio. Direct I/O will skip the filesystem buffer cache, and and allow Oracle to read directly from disk to the database buffer cache. However, on a system where direct I/O is not implemented, which is what you had until you recently messed with that parameter, it's likely that you had an undersized database buffer cache, but that was ok, because many (most) of the physical I/Os your database was doing, were actually being serviced by the O/S filesystem buffer cache. But, you introduced direct I/O, and wiped out the ability of the O/S to service any physical I/Os from filesystem buffer cache. This means that every cache miss on the database buffer cache, turns into a real, physical, spin-the-disk, move-the-drive-head, physical I/O. And, you are suffering the performance consequences.
</speculation>
Ok, end of speculation. Now, assuming that what I've outlined above is actually going on, what to do? Why is direct I/O lower performing than buffered, non-direct I/O? Shouldn't it's performance be superior?
Well, when you have an established system that's using buffered I/O, and you switch to direct I/O, you almost always will have to increase the size of the database buffer cache. The problem is that you took a huge chunk of memory away from the the O/S, that it was using to buffer your I/Os and avoid physical I/O. So, now, you need to make up for it, by increasing the size of the database buffer cache. You can do this, without buying more memory for the box, because the O/S is no longer going to need to use so much memory for filesystem buffers.
So, what to do? Is it worth switching? Well, on balance, it makes sense to use direct I/O, and give Oracle a larger database buffer cache, for the simple fact that (particularly on a server that's dedicated to being an Oracle database server), Oracle has far more sophisticated caching algorithms, and a better understanding of the various types of data being cached, and so should be able to make more efficient use of the memory, than the (relatively) brain dead caching algorithms of the kernel and filesystem mechanisms.
But, once again, it all comes down to this:
What problem are you trying to solve? Did you have any I/O related issues? Do you have any compelling reason to implement direct I/O? Rule #1 is "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." Did you just violate rule #1? :-)
Finally, since you're on Linux, you can use the 'free' command to see how much memory is on the box, how much is free, and how much is dedicated to filesystem cache buffers. This response is already pretty long, so, I'm not going to get into details, however, if you're not familiar with the command, the results could be misleading. Read the man page, and try to be clear about understanding it before you make any assumptions about the output.
Hope that helps,
-Mark

Error in report getting "Invalid set of rows requested......."

Hi all,
I have search report in which, 5 multiselects are there and two select list are there.
some times when we choose the options and press 'GO' button
this kind of error is comming
"Invalid set of rows requested, the source data of the report has been modified."
But after going to another page and comming back it is working properly.
What might be the reason for it?? how to avoid it???
Please any suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks in advance
kavitha

Hi
Please anyone could give me suggestion to solve the problem...
First time, when i run the application. the first page is the search page and the report will by-default display.
i am displaying 25 records per page. and when i click the pagination next arrow mark, it is saying "No records found"
but when i click the GO button once again it is comming.
This happens only once that too, only for the 2nd page... when i press next arrow for the next pages (3rd page) it is working fine.
when i run the application in the beginning.(ie when i start to run the application for the first time)
thanks in advance
kavitha

How to insert a set of rows at a time from another table

Hello!
I have a table1 and table 2 - i want to insert a set of rows at a time from table1 to table 2. Then do a COMMIT. Then continue inserting another set of rows and so on.... say i want to insert into table 2 i million records at a time and then do a commit. then continue with the next 1 million and do a commit and so on..until there are no more records in table 1
Any ideas please!!!!!!!!!!

may be this will help
declare
cursor c1
select * from table1
i_counter binary_integer := 1;
begin
for c1_rec in c1
insert into table2
values(c1_rec.,..);
if i_counter = 1000? then
commit;
i_counter = 1;
end if;
i_counter := i_counter+1;
end loop
end;

Error 2: Failed to perform Action

I used the Program > Uninstall to remove all the NI Software from my PC due to a largenumber of issues in the dev encironment.
I then went to reinstall just LabVIEW 2014. I now get an error: "Error 2: Failed to perform ACtion Liscence Manager Updating OS Compatibility." The next dialog is "Unknown Error (no details)" and then the install exits.
If I look at Programs and Features, I see that the only NI program installed was the NI Customer Experience Improvement Program (irony...)
One KB Article suggsting installing the NI Update Service, but that failed too.
I have tried registry cleaning and MS Fix It, still no help.
I cant go back to a restore point, since there is a restore point created for each NI software (100+), and by default windows seems to only store the last 20 or so.
I really do not want to reformat since I have other software that is a pain in the butt with liscencing to re-setup.
I have re-downloaded the LV2014 installer from the website twice, no improvement.
Kenny

I would recommend creating a service request to work with an NI Applications Engineer on this issue:
https://lumen.ni.com/nicif/us/gb_srm/content.xhtml?du=https%3A%2F%2Fsine.ni.com%2Fsrm%2Fapp%2Fgetass...

Is it feasible to set the rows displayed per page dynamically?

Hi,
Is it feasible to set the rows displayed per page dynamically in the table view result as per the user wants eg : the user wishes to see only 25 records or all the records?
Also what is the maximum limit of rows that can be fetched as per the entry in instanceconfig.xml :
<ResultRowLimit>65000</ResultRowLimit>
Is there a limit for number of rows being displayed in table view?
thanks
Rishabh

See this
How to increase default number of rows dspalyed ?
This is your thread only...

How to load only first set of rows only in pagination of interactive report

Hi all,
Iam using 3.2 x and database 10g.
I have created interactive report and it contains 500000 records. and iam using pagination x to y but background it loads complete rows from database.
To load complete 500000 records page taking 10 minutes.So My reqiurement is I need to load first set of rows like 500 rows and Once i click next button then only it should load next set of rows like 501 to 1000.
Please tell any idea to resolve the above problem.
thanks
balu

Balu,
try to trace your page to see how your statement can be tuned. To do that add &p_trace=YES to the URL.
This creates a standard Database Trace file which can be analyzed with TKPROF or SQL Developer or similiar tools.
brgds,
Peter
Blog: http://www.oracle-and-apex.com
ApexLib: http://apexlib.oracleapex.info
BuilderPlugin: http://builderplugin.oracleapex.info
Work: http://www.click-click.at

Perform action on set of rows

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for