Performance Issue while changing a characteristic using CT04 transaction
Hi Experts,
Just now we have upgraded our system from 4.6C to ECC 6.0. In the new system we have created some characteristics and later I am trying to change these characteristics using transaction CT04 .
There are some characteristics which are already present in the new system which has come from 4.6 C. Now when I try to open/change these characteristic (already existing) using CT04 it does not take any time where as if I try to open/change a characteristic which is created newly in ECC 6.0, then it takes a lot of time.
When I run SQL trace for both the scenario, then I find that most of the time taken is on Query on table PLFV.
Trace Result for Newly Created Characteristic :
115 PLFV PREPARE 0 SELECT WHERE "MANDT" = :A0 AND "ATINN"
= :A1 AND "LOEKZ" = :A2 AND ROWNUM <= :A3
3 PLFV OPEN 0 SELECT WHERE "MANDT" = '070' AND "ATINN" =
0000000575 AND "LOEKZ" = ' ' AND ROWNUM <= 1
336681733 PLFV FETCH 0 1403
For this time taken is 336681733 .
Trace Result for Existing Characteristic :
2 PLFV OPEN 0 SELECT WHERE "MANDT" = '070' AND "
ATINN" = 0000000575 AND "LOEKZ" = ' ' AND ROWNUM <= 1
For this time taken is 2.
Here one difference I see is that for the Newly created characteristic, Prepare, Open and Fetch part is executed where as for the already existing query only Open is executed.
The program which is used for querying PLFV is SAPLCMX_TOOLS_CHARACTERISTICS.
Could you please help me in this.
Your response is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Lalit Kabra
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the response. But the problem which I mentioned is not with all the characteristics. It occurs only with those characteristics which are newly created. The characteristics which are already created are opened without any delay.
So I am bit confused whether for this problem there would be be any note though I tried searching the same as well.
Please respond if some one has clue about this issue.
Your response is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Lalit Kabra
Similar Messages
-
Performance Issue while changing Characteristics from CT04
Hi Experts,
Just now we have upgraded our system from 4.6C to ECC 6.0. In the new system we have created some characteristics and later I am trying to change these characteristics using transaction CT04 .
There are some characteristics which are already present in the new system which has come from 4.6 C. Now when I try to open/change these characteristic (already existing) using CT04 it does not take any time where as if I try to open/change a characteristic which is created newly in ECC 6.0, then it takes a lot of time.
When I run SQL trace for both the scenario, then I find that most of the time taken is on Query on table PLFV.
Trace Result for Newly Created Characteristic :
115 PLFV PREPARE 0 SELECT WHERE "MANDT" = :A0 AND "ATINN"
= :A1 AND "LOEKZ" = :A2 AND ROWNUM <= :A3
3 PLFV OPEN 0 SELECT WHERE "MANDT" = '070' AND "ATINN" =
0000000575 AND "LOEKZ" = ' ' AND ROWNUM <= 1*
336681733 PLFV FETCH 0 1403
For this time taken is 336681733 .
Trace Result for Existing Characteristic :
2 PLFV OPEN 0 SELECT WHERE "MANDT" = '070' AND "
ATINN" = 0000000575 AND "LOEKZ" = ' ' AND ROWNUM <= 1
For this time taken is 2.
Here one difference I see is that for the Newly created characteristic, Prepare, Open and Fetch part is executed where as for the already existing query only Open is executed.
The program which is used for querying PLFV is SAPLCMX_TOOLS_CHARACTERISTICS.
Could you please help me in this.
Your response is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Lalit Kabrahi Rajesh,
Pls check the below comments
Please install the Oracle optimizer patch 6740811 and 6455795 as per
note 871096. Also ensure you have installed the other patches listed in
the same note as these are mandatory when running on Oracle 10.2
If this does not solve your problem open an OSS message for this.
Regards,
Lalit -
Performance issues while accessing the Confirm/Goods Services' transaction
Hello
We are using SRM 4.0 , through Enterprise Portal 7.0.
Many of our users are crippled by Performance issues when accessing the Confirm/Goods Services tab( Transaction bbpcf02).
The system simply clocks and would never show the screen.
This problem occurs for some users all the time, and some users for some time.
It's not related to the User's machine as others are able to access it fast using the same machine.
It is also not dependent on the data size (i.e.no . of confirmations created by the user).
We would like to know why only some users are suffering more pronouncedly, and why is this transaction generally slower than all others.
Any directions for finding the Probable cause will be highly rewarded.
Thanks
KedarHi Kedar,
Please go through the following OSS Notes:
Note 610805 - Performance problems in goods receipt
Note 885409 - BBPCF02: The search for confirmation and roles is slow
Note 1258830 - BBPCF02: Display/Process confirmation response time is slow
Thanks,
Pradeep -
Performance issue while opening the report
HI,
I am working BO XI R3.1.there is performance issue while opening the report in BO Solris Server but on window server it is compratively fast.
we have few reports which contains 5 fixed prompt 7 optional prompt.
out of 5 fixed prompt 3 prompt is static (it contains 3 -4 record only )which is coming from materlied view.
we have already use many thing for improve performance in report like-
1) Index Awareness
2) Aggregate Awareness
3) Array fatch size-250
3) Aray bind time -32767
4) Login time out -600
the issue is that before refresh opening the report iteslf taking time 1.30 min on BO solris server but same report taking time in BO window server 45 sec. even we import on others BO solris server it is taking same time as per old solris server(1.30 min).
when we close the trace in solris server than it is taking 1.15 sec time.it should not be intial phase it is not hitting more on database.so why it is taking that much time while opening the report.
could you please guide us where exectly problem is there and how we can improve performance for opening the report.In case the problem related to solris server so what would be and how can we rectify.
Incase any further input require for the same feel free to ask me.Hi Kumar,
If this is happening with all the reports then this issue seems to be due to firewall or security settings of Solaris OS.
Please try to lower down the security level in solaris and test for the issue.
Regards,
Chaitanya Deshpande -
Performance issue while generating Query
Hi BI Gurus.
I am facing performance issue while generating query on 0IC_C03.
It has a variable as (from & to) for generating the report for a particular time duration.
if the variable (from & to) fields is filled then after taking a long time it shows run time error.
& if the query is executed without mentioning the variable(which is optional) then the data is extracted from beginning to till date. the same takes less time in execution.
& after that the period has to be selected manually by option keep filter value. please suggest how can i solve the error
Regards
RitikaHI RITIKA,
WEL COME TO SDN.
YOUHAVE TO CHECK THE FOLLOWING RUN TIME SEGMENTS USING ST03N TCODE:
High Database Runtime
High OLAP Runtime
High Frontend Runtime
if its high Database Runtime :
- check the aggregates or create aggregates on cube and this helps you.
if its High OLAP Runtime :
- check the user exits if any.
- check the hier. are used and fetching in deep level.
If its high frontend runtime:
- check if a very high number of cells and formattings are transferred to the Frontend ( use "All data" to get value "No. of Cells") which cause high network and frontend (processing) runtime.
For From and to date variables, create one more set and use it and try.
Regs,
VACHAN -
I'm facing performance issue while accessing the PLAF Table
Dar all,
I'm facing performance issue while accessing the PLAF Table.
The START-OF-SELECTION of the report starts with the following select query.
SELECT plnum pwwrk matnr gsmng psttr FROM plaf
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_tab
WHERE matnr IN s_matnr
AND pwwrk = p_pwwrk
AND psttr IN s_psttr
AND auffx = 'X'
AND paart = 'LA' .
While executing the report in the Quality system it does not face any performance issue...
When it comes to Production System the above said select query itself it is taking 15 - 20 minutes time to move further.
Kindly help me to over come this problem...
Regards,
JessiHi,
"Just implement its primary Key
WHERE PLNUM BETWEEN '0000000001' AND '9999999999' " By this you are implementing the Primary Key
This statement has nothing to do with performance, because system is not able to use primary key or uses every row.
Jessica, your query uses secondary index created by SAP:
1 (Material, plant) which uses fields MANDT MATNR and PLWRK.
but it is not suitable in your case.
You can consider adding new one, which would containt all fields: MANDT, MATNR, PWWRK, PSTTR AUFFX PAART
or - but it depends on number of rows meeting and not meeting (auffx = 'X' AND paart = 'LA' ) condition.
It could speed the performance, if you would create secondary index based on fields MANDT, MATNR, PWWRK, PSTTR
and do like Ramchander suggested: remove AUFFX and PAART from index and where section, and remove these unwanted rows
after the query using DELETE statement.
Regards,
Przemysław
Please check how many rows in production system -
Performance issue in browsing SSAS cube using Excel for first time after cube refresh
Hello Group Members,
This is a continuation of my earlier blog question -
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/a1e424a2-f102-4165-a597-f464cf03ebb5/cache-and-performance-issue-in-browsing-ssas-cube-using-excel-for-first-time?forum=sqlanalysisservices
As that thread is marked as answer, but my issue is not resolved, I am creating a new thread.
I am facing a cache and performance issue for the first time when I try to open a SSAS cube connection using Excel (using Data tab -> From Other Sources --> From Analysis Services) after daily cube refresh. In end users system (8 GB RAM but around
4GB available RAM), for the first time, it takes 10 minutes to open the cube. From next run onwards, its open up quickly within 10 secs.
We have daily ETL process running in high end servers. The configuration of dedicated SSAS cube server is 8 core, 64GB RAM. In total we have 4 cube DB - out of which for 3 is full cube refresh and 1 is incremental refresh. We have seen after daily cube
refresh, it takes 10 odd minutes to open the cube in end users system. From next time onwards, it opens up really fast with 10 secs. After cube refresh, in server systems (32 GB RAM, around 4GB available RAM), it takes 2 odd minutes to open the cube.
Is there, any way we could reduce the time taken for first attempt ?
As mentioned in my previous thread, we have already implemented a cube wraming cache. But, there is no improvement.
Currently, the cumulative size of the all 4 cube DB are more than 9 GB in Production and each cube DB having 4 individual cubes in average with highest cube DB size is 3.5 GB. Now, the question is how excel works with SSAS cube after
daily cube refresh?
Is it Excel creates a cache of the schema and data after each time cube is refreshed and in doing so it need to download the cube schema in Excel's memory? Now to download the the schema and data of each cube database from server to client, it will take
a significant time based on the bandwidth of the network and connection.
Is it anyway dependent to client system RAM ? Today the bigest cube DB size is 3.5 GB, tomorrow it will be 5-6 GB. Now, though client system RAM is 8 GB, the available or free RAM would be around 4 GB. So, what will happen then ?
Best Regards, Arka Mitra.Could you run the following two DMV queries filling in the name of the cube you're connecting to. Then please post back the row count returned from each of them (by copying them into Excel and counting the rows).
I want to see if this is an issue I've run across before with thousands of dimension attributes and MDSCHEMA_CUBES performance.
select [HIERARCHY_UNIQUE_NAME]
from $system.mdschema_hierarchies
where CUBE_NAME = 'YourCubeName'
select [LEVEL_UNIQUE_NAME]
from $system.mdschema_levels
where CUBE_NAME = 'YourCubeName'
Also, what version of Analysis Services is it? If you connect Object Explorer in Management Studio to SSAS, what's the exact version number it says on the top server node?
http://artisconsulting.com/Blogs/GregGalloway -
Issues while processing the BOMs using fm ''CSAP_MAT_BOM_MAINTAIN'
Hi Group,
we are facing issues while processing the BOMs using the basic type(Z-idoc type) for standard type BOMMAT04.
thing is that the segment 'E1STPOM' is defined to contain 1 to 99999 records in it.
when an Idoc is run(say with 150/200 segments of 'E1STPOM'), there was a standard error with error message id PIC01(number : 004) when the Idoc is processed with the Standard function module 'CSAP_MAT_BOM_MAINTAIN'.
the error says 'Error reading material FING_005 . Exception: 0' and Check whether the material number is blocked. but when checked, the Material seems not blocked.
kindly advise how to overcome this error and proceed further.
Regards,
VishnuChecj the material status, while its transfer from one server to another server the status should be different
-
Performance issue while selecting material documents MKPF & MSEG
Hello,
I'm facing performance issues in production while selecting Material documents for Sales order and item based on the Sales order Stock.
Here is the query :
I'm first selecting data from ebew table which is the Sales order Stock table then this query.
IF ibew[] IS NOT INITIAL AND ignore_material_documents IS INITIAL.
* Select the Material documents created for the the sales orders.
SELECT mkpf~mblnr mkpf~budat
mseg~matnr mseg~mat_kdauf mseg~mat_kdpos mseg~shkzg
mseg~dmbtr mseg~menge
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_mseg
FROM mkpf INNER JOIN mseg
ON mkpf~mandt = mseg~mandt
AND mkpf~mblnr = mseg~mblnr
AND mkpf~mjahr = mseg~mjahr
FOR ALL entries IN ibew
WHERE mseg~matnr = ibew-matnr
AND mseg~werks = ibew-bwkey
AND mseg~mat_kdauf = ibew-vbeln
AND mseg~mat_kdpos = ibew-posnr.
SORT i_mseg BY mat_kdauf ASCENDING
mat_kdpos ASCENDING
budat DESCENDING.
ENDIF.
I need to select the material documents because the end users want to see the stock as on certain date for the sales orders and only material document lines can give this information. Also EBEW table gives Stock only for current date.
For Example :
If the report was run for Stock date 30th Sept 2008, but on the 5th Oct 2008, then I need to consider the goods movements after 30th Sept and add if stock was issued or subtract if stock was added.
I know there is an Index MSEG~M in database system on mseg, however I don't know the Storage location LGORT and Movement types BWART that should be considered, so I tried to use all the Storage locations and Movement types available in the system, but this caused the query to run even slower than before.
I could create an index for the fields mentioned in where clause , but it would be an overhead anyways.
Your help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance
regards,
AdvaitHi Thomas,
Thanks for your reply. the performance of the query has significantly improved than before after switching the join from mseg join mkpf.
Actually, I even tried without join and looped using field symbols ,this is working slightly faster than the switched join.
Here are the result , tried with 371 records as our sandbox doesn't have too many entries unfortunately ,
Results before switching the join 146036 microseconds
Results after swithing the join 38029 microseconds
Results w/o join 28068 microseconds for selection and 5725 microseconds for looping
Thanks again.
regards,
Advait -
Cache and performance issue in browsing SSAS cube using Excel for first time
Hello Group Members,
I am facing a cache and performance issue for the first time, when I try to open a SSAS cube connection using Excel (using Data tab -> From Other Sources --> From Analysis Services) after daily cube refresh. In end users
system (8 GB RAM), for the first time, it takes 10 minutes to open the cube. From next run onwards, its open up quickly within 10 secs.
We have daily ETL process running in high end servers. The configuration of dedicated SSAS cube server is 8 core, 64GB RAM. In total we have 4 cubes - out of which for 3 is full cube refresh and 1 is incremental refresh. We have seen after
daily cube refresh, it takes 10 odd minutes to open the cube in end users system. From next time onwards, it opens up really fast with 10 secs. After cube refresh, in server systems (16 GB RAM), it takes 2 odd minutes to open the cube.
Is there, any way we could reduce the time taken for first attempt ?
Best Regards, Arka Mitra.Thanks Richard and Charlie,
We have implemented the solution/suggestions in our DEV environment and we have seen a definite improvement. We are waiting this to be deployed in UAT environment to note down the actual performance and time improvement while browsing the cube for the
first time after daily cube refresh.
Guys,
This is what we have done:
We have 4 cube databases and each cube db has 1-8 cubes.
1. We are doing daily cube refresh using SQL jobs as follows:
<Batch xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine">
<Parallel>
<Process xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ddl2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2" xmlns:ddl2_2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2" xmlns:ddl100_100="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100" xmlns:ddl200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200" xmlns:ddl200_200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200">
<Object>
<DatabaseID>FINANCE CUBES</DatabaseID>
</Object>
<Type>ProcessFull</Type>
<WriteBackTableCreation>UseExisting</WriteBackTableCreation>
</Process>
</Parallel>
</Batch>
2. Next we are creating a separate SQL job (Cache Warming - Profitability Analysis) for cube cache warming for each single cube in each cube db like:
CREATE CACHE FOR [Profit Analysis] AS
{[Measures].members}
*[TIME].[FINANCIAL QUARTER].[FINANCIAL QUARTER]
3. Finally after each cube refresh step, we are creating a new step of type T-SQL where we are calling these individual steps:
EXEC dbo.sp_start_job N'Cache Warming - Profit Analysis';
GO
I will update the post after I receive the actual im[provement from UAT/ Production environment.
Best Regards, Arka Mitra. -
Performance issue while wrapping the sql in pl/sql block
Hi All,
I am facing performance issue in a query while wrapping the sql in pl/sql block.
I have a complex view. while quering the view using
Select * from v_csp_tabs(Name of View I am using), it is taking 10 second to fetch 50,000 records.
But when I am using some conditions on the view, Like
Select * from v_csp_tabs where clientid = 500006 and programid = 1 and vendorid = 1, it is taking more then 250 secs. to return the result set.
now the weird part is this is happening only for one programID, that is 1
I am using Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
Any one please suggest what are the things i need to check..
I am sorry, I could not provide you the explain plan, because this is in production and I do not have enough prevelage.
Thank you in advance.
Thnx,
BitsBits wrote:
I have a complex view. while quering the view using
Select * from v_csp_tabs(Name of View I am using), it is taking 10 second to fetch 50,000 records.
But when I am using some conditions on the view, Like
Select * from v_csp_tabs where clientid = 500006 and programid = 1 and vendorid = 1, it is taking more then 250 secs. to return the result set.That's one problem with views - you never know how they will be used in the future, nor what performance implications variant uses can have.
>
now the weird part is this is happening only for one programID, that is 1
Any one please suggest what are the things i need to check..
I am sorry, I could not provide you the explain plan, because this is in production and I do not have enough prevelage.I understand what you are saying - I have worked at similar sites. HiddenName is correct in suggesting that you need to get execution plans but sometimes getting privileges from the DBA group is simply Not Going To Happen. Its wrong but that's the way it is. Follow through on HiddenName's suggested to get help from somebody who has the privleges needed
Post the query that view view is executing. Desk checking a query is NOT ideal but is one thing we can do.
I don't suppose you can see V$ views on production - V$SQL and V$SQL_PLAN (probably not if you can't generate plans, but its worth a thought) -
Performance Issue while Joining two Big Tables
Hello Experts,
We've the following Scenario, wherein we need to have Sales rep associated for a Sales Order. This information is available in VBPA table with Sales Order, Sales Order Item and Partner Function being the key.
NOw I'm interested in only one Partner Function for e.g. 'ZP'. This table is having around 120 million records.
I tried both options:
Option 1 - Join this table(VBPA) with Sales Order Item table(VBAP) within the Data Foundation Layer of the Analytic View and doing the filtering on Partner Function
Option 2 - Create a Attribute View for VBPA having filtering on Partner Function and then join this Attribute View in the Logical Join Layer with the Data Foundation table.
Both these options are killing the performance.
Is there any way out to achieve this ?
Your expert opinion is greatly appreciated!!
Thanks & regards,
JomyHi,
Lars is correct. You may have to spend a little bit more time and give a bigger picture.
I have used this join. It takes about 2 to 3 seconds to execute this join for me. My data volume is less than yours.
You must be have used a left outer join when joining the attribute view (with constant filter ZP as specified in your first post) to the data foundation. Please cross check once again, as sometimes my fat finger inadvertently changed the join type and I had to go back and fix it. If this is a left outer join or a referential join, HANA does not perform the join if you are not requesting any field from the attribute view on table VBPA. This used to be a problem due to a bug in SP4 but got fixed in SP5.
However, if you have performed this join in the data foundation, it does enforce, the join even if you did not ask any fields from the VBPA table. The reason being that you have put a constant filter ZR (LIPS->VBPA join in data foundation as specified in one of your later replies).
If any measure you are selecting in the analytic view is a restricted measure or a calculated measure that needs some field from VBPA, then the join will be enforced as you would agree. This is where I had most trouble. My join itself is not bad but my business requirement to get the current value of a partner attribute on a higher level calculation view sent too much data from analytic view to calculation view.
Please send the full diagram of your model and vizplan. Also, if you are using a front end (like analysis office), please trap the SQL sent from this front end tool and include it in the message. Even a straight SQL you have used in which you have detected this performance issue will be helpful.
Ramana -
ITunes 10.4 performance issue while tagging
After switching to the 64bit version of iTunes I experience a much worse performance when tagging songs compared to the 32bit version. Changing some values (like comments or genre) of ten songs can take a few minutes. I got a very large library of about 150,000 songs, but this doesn't explain the loss in performance because it used to work better before. Is it some kind of new ID3-format or what could slower the performance?
No suggestions, but I appear to be having the same issue: batch changing a bunch of content is suddenly taking a minute or two. I'm having flashbacks to the aged notebook I retired about a year back.
(I'm getting this with iTunes ten point four and OSX ten point six point eight... and now I need to figure out why the heck trying to type a number in Safari is suddenly sending me to different tabs! That's new...) -
Performance issue in Webi rep when using custom object from SAP BW univ
Hi All,
I had to design a report that runs for the previous day and hence we had created a custom object which ranks the dates and then a pre-defined filter which picks the date with highest rank.
the definition for the rank variable(in universe) is as follows:
<expression>Rank([0CALDAY].Currentmember, Order([0CALDAY].Currentmember.Level.Members ,Rank([0CALDAY].Currentmember,[0CALDAY].Currentmember.Level.Members), BDESC))</expression>
Now to the issue I am currently facing,
The report works fine when we ran it on a test environment ie :with small amount of data.
Our production environment has millions of rows of data and when I run the report with filter it just hangs.I think this is because it tries to rank all the dates(to find the max date) and thus resulting in a huge performance issue.
Can someone suggest how this performance issue can be overcome?
I work on BO XI3.1 with SAP BW.
Thanks and Regards,
Smitha.Hi,
Using a variable on the BW side is not feasible since we want to use the same BW query for a few other reports as well.
Could you please explain what you mean by 'use LAG function'.How can it be used in this scenario?
Thanks and Regards,
Smitha Mohan. -
Performance issues while opening business rule
Hi,
we're working with Hyperion version 9.2.1 and we're having some performance problems while opening business rules. I analyzed the issue and found out that it has something to do with assigning access privileges to the rule.
The authorization plan looks as followed:
User A is assigned to group G1
User B is assigned to group G2
Group G1 ist assigned to Group XYZ
Group G2 ist assigned to Group XYZ
Group XYZ holds the provision "basic user" for the planning application.
Without assigning any access priviliege the business rule opens immediately.
By assigning access privilege to group G1/G2 (validate or launch) the business rule opens immediately.
By assigning access privilege to group XYZ the business rule opens after 2-5 minutes.
Has anyone an idea why this happens and how to solve this?
Kind regards
Uli
Edited by: user13110201 on 12.05.2010 04:31This has been an issue with Business Rules for quite awhile. Oracle has made steps both forward and backward in later releases than yours; and they've issued patches addressing, if not completely resolving, the problem. Things finally seem to be much better in 11.1.1.3, although YMMV.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I edited my original question above to provide all the info that I can think of. It is very frustrating to no longer be able to directly print from a website except for PDF files. I can do a work around by copying a web page to Microsoft Word and the
-
How would BT wire a new line to my property for £1...
Hi guys, it's question time for me this week . Anyway, does anyone have a clue on earth how BT would wire a second line to my property for £124.99? My primary line is a pavement one and there are no telegraph poles near my property. The good ol' stre
-
IPhoto library not appearing in open or attach dialog
Hello this is my first posting here and this might be in the wrong area but I'm having a problem with iPhoto and I'm not exactly sure where to ask for help. I just purchased a new MacBook Pro 15" and have migrated all my stuff from my old MacBook 13"
-
Exchange mail doesn't push unless opened
Just got my iPhone 5s and setup my Exchange email on it. It's set to push email but it doesn't notify me of a new email unless I open the Mail app, then it syncs. I have an iPad 3 with ios 7 and it pushes just fine. Is there somewhere I can look to s
-
Ghost clips appearing on FCP timeline-why?
every now and again in this edit, I'll drop a clip (say clip #1) on to the timeline, do a render at some point in the future, and then later move/delete clip #1. Afterwards, when I play timeline on the canvas, the clip I deleted will show up again, o