Performance Prob on 5600 TD256

2 months ago, I replaced my GeForce4 Ti4200 with the 5600 TD 256. I had some troubles (windows auto-detect giving me fits), but I resolved them. I finally went to test my card's speed using 3dmark 2001SE and to my surprise my marks dropped from 11000 or so to around 9300. I was shocked, so I did some tweaking and got the latest drivers, but nothing helped. It is not just that test. Both UT2003 and Unreal 2, as well as some other games skip periodically, and my frame rates are low. Even Max Payne, which is going on 2 years old, exhibits low frame rates at certain times. I have the image quality setting in the nvidia control panel set to blend, and I am nt using any quality enhancers, like anti-aliasing. Is this all I can expect from this card? If not, someone help me please! My specs are as follows.
Mobo: Asus p4pe
Procsessor: Northwood p4 2.4 ghz
Video Card:GeForce Fx 5600 TD256
Ram:512mb Kingston ValueRam DDR @ 333mhz
HDD:20 GB Western Digital (don't know model)
OS: Windows 98SE
Sound: SBLive Value

If you compare 3Dmark scores with AA enabled the FX5600 will have an advantage and personally I only care about preformance with AA.
But in "brute force" the Ti4200 is faster, that's true.
The FX5600 has DX9 support so 3D Mark2003 will run better on it and it has a better picture quality because of 128bit internal color.

Similar Messages

Clock speeds FX 5600-TD256

Hi,
i have a MSI fx 5600-TD256, and the standard clocks are 250/400
i checked tomshardware and it says that the standard speeds are 325/550
i tried to overclocked it but i can't get higher then 325/442
is this normal?

I think 325/550 is right, but the FX cards have a 2D frequency and 3D frequency. How did you measure the speed ?
The FX5900 for example has a 2D speed of 300/850 and 3D speed of 400/850.
You can get a little program called coolbits from http://www.guru3d.com and install it ( it's just a registry key ), then go to the driver settings and you will see a new frequencies tab.

How to judge performance prob

Dear All,
I have gone through ST03 , ST06 , ST02 , ST04 several times but never get any conclusion where is the prob .
what I have to check
Total cpu , avg. cpu time, total rep. time , avg. resp. time , Total db , avg db time
which bacground task is taking too much time ?
is the sytem is busy with rfc call ?
any transection taking too much cpu time but not taking too much db time .
how to measure the time just like a doctor check through bench mark ( like blook pressure measure between 80 to 120 )
what to check in ST02 ?
I think i am looking for threshhold value ?
suppose cpu time is 3200 ms . is it high cpu time or normal ?
very much confused about the performance .
Pl. advice .
any good docs , link , wiki , TIPS ?

As long as no user complains and all jobs run ok, you are basically fine
But let me do an example, you have a user complaining that transaction X is running slow. Now you need to find out, what is taking the largest part of the response time. I often just monitor the workprocess in transaction SM50, constantly refreshing while the transaction is running. If you see the workprocess stuck on one single database table, you will have to look that up. If there are almost no database tables, this means most of the time is spent in abap code. You can also use transaction ST03 to figure out where the main part of the response time is spent.
Depending on this, you can do an SQL trace with ST05 (if the time spent is on the database), or a runtime analysis in SE30 to find which parts consume the most time. Or you use the debugger to capture a running transaction, often the place where you land is the part taking the most time.
Causes for high database times are often missing indexes, wrong database access (wrong cbo decision) or suboptimal coding.
Causes for high abap times are often nested loops, searching on unsorted lists etc.
Regards, Michael

Performance prob

Hi All
Have a problem. I wrote a procedure which deals with 30K rows with 25 cols, the proc runs with in 7 mins here in NT and it takes 1 hr 30 mins + on HP-Unix both running Oracle 8i. What do i need to chk to rectify the prob and gain performance. every thing else is same including code,indexes..etc.
Suggations welcomed Pls
Ashok

Ashok,
I'd say without question one (or more) of your SQL queries is doing a full table scan. I say this because the performance is WAY off, not just a few seconds. Besides, the HP unix performance would blow away NTs any day of the week. What you really nee to do, and should have done in the first place, is go to every SIUD (select/insert/update/delete) statement in your proc and do an EXPLAIN PLAN on it. Use free TOAD to do this, is so quick and easy.
See example below ...
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE SP_TEST
AS
--[LOCAL VARIABLES]
LD_TEMP DATE;
BEGIN
--[MAIN]
SELECT D1 INTO LD_TEMP FROM T1 WHERE T1.N1 = 123;
--[EP] : FIX
--SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=1 Card=1 Bytes=9)
-- TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF T1 (Cost=1 Card=1 Bytes=9)
SELECT /*+ RULE */ D1 INTO LD_TEMP FROM T1 WHERE T1.N1 = 123;
--[EP] : OK [RULE]
--SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=HINT: RULE
-- TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF T1
-- INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF I_NU_T1_N1 (NON-UNIQUE)
END SP_TEST;
Notice the 2 SQL queries are the same and should use the index on column N1. In that case I had to tell the optimizer to use RULE so it would get used. So the solution for you is you have to go to every SIUD statement and do the explain plan [EP]. Even if you make up some fake data in the WHERE clause.
I usually have a debugger with the pl/sql code I write that records the START and END times for each SIUD. This way you can find which queries are taking the longest to run. You should probably have something like this as well. Over all I'd say a table scan is occurring, if you find ones that are try adding the hint /*+ RULE */ or /*+ FIRST_ROWS */ or /*+ ALL_ROWS */. Check to make sure indexes are not missing.
Also doing sql like the following (in the where clause) will force a full table scan even if the column is indexed. Be careful when using functions in the where clause.
SELECT T1.N1 FROM T1 WHERE TO_CHAR(T1.N1) = 123;
SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=1 Card=1 Bytes=2)
TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF T1 (Cost=1 Card=1 Bytes=2)
Overall the time difference is much to great to be really anything else but full table scans occurring. It could be a record locking problem, as this process might be waiting for other locks to get released, but I would do the EP for all the SIUD (and record start/end times for each). A good programmer will have done both anyway.
Oh one more thing I just thought about, analyze the statistics for all the tables used in your proc. Even if the SQL is correct (and all the indexes) you should do this as without doing an analyze after loading these tables it might end up doing a full table scan. Some of the more common ones are shown below ...
ANALYZE TABLE T1 COMPUTE STATISTICS;
ANALYZE TABLE T1 COMPUTE STATISTICS FOR ALL INDEXES;
ANALYZE TABLE T1 COMPUTE STATISTICS FOR ALL INDEXED COLUMNS;
If you find full table scans occurring and can't get it to use an index, paste the code in here (and what indexes are present) and we'll have a look at it.
Tyler D.

5600 TD256 crashes in some games

Here is my system :
Operating System
Windows XP Professional Service Pack 1
Processor
2,40 gigahertz Intel Pentium 4
Memory
512Mb DDR
HD
2*60Gb Seagate Raid
Vga
Msi GF Fx5600 TD256
Mb
Msi 845E max2
Sound
Sb Audigy Player
And here is my problem :
Some games such as Far Cry or Painkiller are playing fine on my pc while in Command & Conquer Generals Zero Hour and Rainbow Six 3 Raven Shield the pc crashes and the code that appears in the blue screen is(most of the times) :
0x0000008E (0xC0000005, 0xBFA61944, 0xADD73BD4, 0x00000000)
nv4_disp.dll - Address BFA61944 base at BF9B7000 Datestamp 00000000
I have tried every driver from nvidia or msi and the prob still exists

I disabled the 2 com ports but it's still the same
IRQ 1(ISA) Standard 101/102-Key or Microsoft Natural PS/2 Keyboard
IRQ 6(ISA) Standard floppy disk controller
IRQ 8(ISA) System CMOS/real time clock
IRQ 9(ISA) Microsoft ACPI-Compliant System
IRQ 12(ISA) Mouse compliant with PS2
IRQ 13(ISA) Processor
IRQ 14(ISA) Primary IDE Channel
IRQ 15(ISA) Secondary IDE Channel
IRQ 16(PCI) Intel 82801DB/DBM USB universal host controller -24C2
IRQ 16(PCI) Nvidia Geforce Fx5600
IRQ 16(PCI) Primary controller OHCI Compliant IEEE 1394
IRQ 18(PCI) AVM Fritz v2.0
IRQ 18(PCI) Intel 82801DB/DBM USB universal host controller -24C7
IRQ 19(PCI) Creative sb audigy
IRQ 19(PCI) Intel 82801DB/DBM USB universal host controller -24C4
IRQ 20(PCI) Intel PRO/100 VE network connection
IRQ 22(PCI) WinXP promise MBfastTrack133 Lite controller
IRQ 23(PCI) Intel 82801DB/DBM USB2 enhanced host controller -24CD
Can't i give more irqs to the PCI ?
the IEEE1394 is onboard the sound card (audigy)
I don't know if that's what you asked but these were written onto the psu:
POWMAX 400W PBL 9900
Output: +5v / 25A Max
-12v / 0.8A Max
-5v / 0.5A Max
+12v / 16A Max
+3.3v / 20A Max
+5.5sb / 2A Max

Connect BY Performance Prob- [10.2.0.4 - No Additonal Patch Sets deployed]

Hi All,
Having trouble with a connect-by performance.
All columns are indexed, so cannot see why this is taking so long to retrieve a 135 row data-set (105,000 rows data set).
For some reason the explain plan insists on Full Table Scans:
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS
Cost: 1,121 Bytes: 3,390,384 Cardinality: 70,633 CPU Cost: 203,799,167 IO Cost: 1,085
     16 HASH JOIN Cost: 1,121 Bytes: 3,390,384 Cardinality: 70,633 CPU Cost: 203,799,167 IO Cost: 1,085
          1 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE BANKREC.test_table Cost: 140 Bytes: 632,259 Cardinality: 70,251 CPU Cost: 42,653,073 IO Cost: 132
          15 VIEW BANKREC. Cost: 665 Bytes: 3,870,321 Cardinality: 99,239 CPU Cost: 124,660,113 IO Cost: 643
               14 CONNECT BY WITH FILTERING
                    6 VIEW BANKREC. Cost: 665 Bytes: 7,740,642 Cardinality: 99,239 CPU Cost: 124,660,113 IO Cost: 643
                         5 SORT UNIQUE Cost: 665 Bytes: 1,488,570 Cardinality: 99,239 CPU Cost: 119,007,497 IO Cost: 641
                              4 UNION-ALL
                                   2 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE BANKREC.test_table Cost: 137 Bytes: 1,488,570 Cardinality: 99,238 CPU Cost: 31,045,760 IO Cost: 132
                                   3 FAST DUAL Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1 CPU Cost: 7,271 IO Cost: 2
                    13 HASH JOIN
                         7 CONNECT BY PUMP
                         12 VIEW BANKREC. Cost: 665 Bytes: 2,580,214 Cardinality: 99,239 CPU Cost: 124,660,113 IO Cost: 643
                              11 SORT UNIQUE Cost: 665 Bytes: 1,488,570 Cardinality: 99,239 CPU Cost: 119,007,497 IO Cost: 641
                                   10 UNION-ALL
                                        8 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE BANKREC.test_table Cost: 137 Bytes: 1,488,570 Cardinality: 99,238 CPU Cost: 31,045,760 IO Cost: 132
                                        9 FAST DUAL Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1 CPU Cost: 7,271 IO Cost: 2
The query data being returned is based upon- 20-level depth / up to 10-items at any given single depth hierarchy.
The problem I have is this is taking 2-3 secs to return any given groups data back.
The query:
select * from connect_by_testv4
where acct_group = 1110777 /*Pick anything but 0 - as 0 returns all acct_ids which are in a group.
Select a acct_group which exists*/
The view:
CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW CONNECT_BY_TESTv4
(ACCT_GROUP, ACCT_ID)
AS
with account_groups
as (select connect_by_root ba.acct_id orig_id, ba.acct_id, ba.acct_group
from (select acct_id, acct_group, acct_type /*We add record 0 as this is the top level of the hierarchy*/
from test_table b1
union
select 0, null,4 from dual) ba
start with (ba.acct_type =4) /*acct_type =4- Group: List only the groups then find the children*/
connect by ba.acct_group = prior ba.acct_id
select ag.orig_id acct_group, ag.acct_id
from account_groups ag
join test_table unio
on ag.acct_id = unio.acct_id
where unio.acct_type in (0,1,2) /*List all items which are not groups, or deleted - acct_type = 3=deleted*/
The table structure:
CREATE TABLE test_table
acct_id INTEGER NOT NULL ,
field1 VARCHAR2(255) NOT NULL ,
field2 VARCHAR2(255) NOT NULL ,
field3 INTEGER NULL ,
acct_group INTEGER NULL ,
field5 CHAR(3) NOT NULL ,
acct_type INTEGER NOT NULL ,
field6 INTEGER NULL ,
CONSTRAINT test_table_pk PRIMARY KEY (acct_id)
CREATE INDEX test_table_if3 ON test_table
acct_group ASC
CREATE INDEX test_table_if4 ON test_table
acct_type ASC
Anyone have any ideas how to make this faster?
(The equivilant query on a different competitors RDBMS takes 0.5 sec to return this same data - on a machine with the same IO power)
It does seem a little odd that the CPU resource required is: CPU Cost: 203,799,167 ?
I have tested with an IOT base table - no real perf. diff benefits either.
Test Data can be sent (In a CSV file - 3Mb) - email: [email protected].
Thanks in advance,
Dan.

Hi All,
is the magic number 4 in :
select 0, null,4 from dual) ba
start with (ba.acct_type =4) /*acct_type =4- Group: List only the groups then find the children*/
-- Can I add this data to the base table data - unfortunatly not, without making the application break.
--The union part will always be 0 - acct_id, acct_type = 4, group_id = NULL [This will always be the case, never changing]
1) Yes UNION /UNION ALL is being problematic. Table has 105,000 rows.
2) There is an index on ACCT_ID/ACCT_GROUP/ACCT_TYPE - all of which are individual indexes.
3) ACCT_ID - is a PK Index (Apologies for not including this in the post)
4) ACCOUNT_GROUPS is a Common Table Expression (CTE): http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_with_clause.htm
5) Indexes are present. Why oh Why cannot oracle join to a CONNECT BY when given input parameters on the view definition instead of to the materialised data-set ?
Materialised view - cannot be considered this is an enterprise edition feature mostly.
When running the same type of query on a different RDBMS System, the following:
select * from <view_name> where acct_group = X
This results in the query inserting acct_group into the middle of the CTE / connect-by expression - so it does a fast lookup inside the Connect-by-clause limiting the results set to the perform the outer joins. This other RDBMS SYstem only takes about 180 ms to perform this query, where the oracle engine takes 2-3 seconds (as it materialises the CTE fully and does not insert the acct_group in the middle of the connect-by expression).
This query only works efficiently in Oracle when converted to a User Defined Function - e.g. specifying the @acct_group as an input variable:
with account_groups
as (select connect_by_root ba.acct_id orig_id, ba.acct_id, ba.acct_group
from (select acct_id, acct_group, acct_type
from bs_accts b1
union
select 0, null,4 from dual) ba
start with (ba.acct_type =4 and acct_id = @acct_group)
connect by ba.acct_group = prior ba.acct_id
The performance of the view/UDF should be the same - I am happy to say oracles RDBMS engine in this case is generating BAD Plans for a connect by and failing badly in optimising the query being asked of it.
If people want test data: email: [email protected]
So to be absolutly clear, the following performs: (Returns data in about 422 ms)--
with account_groups
as (select connect_by_root ba.acct_id orig_id, ba.acct_id, ba.acct_group
from (select acct_id, acct_group, acct_type
from bs_accts b1
) ba
start with (ba.acct_type =4 and ba.acct_id = 1000001) /*UDF - uses @acct_group variable here*/
connect by ba.acct_group = prior ba.acct_id
select ag.orig_id acct_group, ag.acct_id
from account_groups ag
join bs_accts unio
on ag.acct_id = unio.acct_id
where unio.acct_type in (0,1,2)
and ag.orig_id = 1000001;
Where the following: (Returns data in about 2 seconds)
with account_groups
as (select connect_by_root ba.acct_id orig_id, ba.acct_id, ba.acct_group
from (select acct_id, acct_group, acct_type
from bs_accts b1
) ba
start with (ba.acct_type =4)
connect by ba.acct_group = prior ba.acct_id
select ag.orig_id acct_group, ag.acct_id
from account_groups ag
join bs_accts unio
on ag.acct_id = unio.acct_id
where unio.acct_type in (0,1,2)
and ag.orig_id =1000001 ;
* The above query generates a poor plan. Due to what I believe is an oracle engine optimisation deficiency.
Edited by: user626167 on 01-Sep-2008 06:08

EBS performance prob

HI everyone,
iam facing a problem of slow speed at the client end , EBS pages open very slowly or just hang , my EBS version is 11.5.10 , DB is oracle 9.2.0.5 and OS HP UX 11.11 . i ran statspack to know abt wait events , i got high waits in
SQL*Net message from client
Avg
Total Wait wait Waits
Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn
enqueue 55,365 53,751 163,230 2948 2.4
SQL*Net message from client 2,464,948 0 660,740 268 107.4
any suggestions?

only we patched our EBS to CU2 ie 11.5.10.2Did you run Gather Schema Statistics concurrent program after the upgrade?
is there any way to see which user is connected to EBS at a time and its Ip address?Note: 295206.1 - How to Count Total Number of Users Connected to ORACLE Application
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=295206.1
USERS CONNECTED
Re: USERS CONNECTED
Number of users logged in last two months
Number of users logged in last two months
No of Apps users log-in
Re: No of Apps users log-in.

K9A2 Neo + AMD X2 6000+ performance problem

Hello!
I got this problem wich i wonder if it has to do with the chipset contra graphic card.
I used to have an AMD X2 3800+, ASUS A8N5X NFORCE4 mobo, 2gb PC3200 400mhz, and i exchange those for AMD X2 6000+, MSI K9A2 Neo, 2gb Corsair XMS2 800mhz. My graphics card is a NVIDIA GF8000GTS running under Win XP 32.
My problem comes down to that this new gear runs like my older. If not worse at times. And my friend that has an identical system can play on very high settings without any stutter while i have to play on normal. Exactlly as my older system. The difference we have is that he is using a NFORCE motherboard. Im now wondering if that has such an impact on performance? Having a NVIDIA graphics card and use this MSI with ATI chipset.
When i baught it today i asked for NFORCE but i guess he forgot after picking it up and handing it to me, and i ofcourse forgot to double check. I thaught it was NFORCE7 when i saw the "770" marking. I also installed some AMD CPU DRIVERS that came with the disc. Dont know what they are for. Never seen that before. I also skipped installing the "ATI SYSTEM DRIVERS" as i figured i dont use ATI graphics card. Dont know if i should?
I will exchange this for a NFORCE mobo, but i just wanted to check with you if this really can have such impact on performance.
I have everyhing else updated to latest drivers with XP SP3 up to date.
Hope for some answer. Thank you in advance.
Regards
Alex

My friend and i got the same gear apart from the nforce mobo.
I got a 500W PSU and it should do as antother friend of mine got 600W and running SLI and faster CPU, more RAM etc. When i installed this i ofcourse formatted and made a fresh install. Unless you mean that i need to install the ATI SYSTEM DRIVERS first? I dont know if its 30 AMPS on the PSU though. Need to check that.
To me it just sounds more sain to use Nvidia chipset together with Nvidia graphics card, and ATI chipset with ATI graphics. But as you say you got no performance probs with that i might be wrong. However i am comparing to a friend with the same gear and playing online at the same time. He can go way up in settings i cant. I even stutter on the normal settings, and he doesnt on the high settings.
Gotta check the 30AMPS now.
Thanks for your ideas. Your probably right. Will check.
Regards
Alex

Any one else have these problems with Mavericks 10.9.3?

I've observed the following wiith Mavericks:
If the system has multiple user accounts on it, it will start, erratically it seems, running background processes with those user IDs. With com.apple.IconServicesAgent eating up sometimes nearly 300MB of memory, this can get to be a memory wart hog.
It appears to be using about 20% more memory.
The fans are coming on a lot more, indicating the CPU is being taxed.
Erratically and inconsistently "losing" external drives on sleep.
High levels of memory compression when there was none before.
I reported on item #1 last night with this link:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/25807061#25807061
I monitor system activity with a tool named Performance Probe which shows the memory usage the old way (pie chart) and then bring up Activity Monitor to get the deteails. After rebooting one time, Performance Probe showed nearly 3GB out of 4GB of memory in active use right after booting, this used to report less than 2 GB. The exact same thing happened as in the link above, but in this case every single user account on the system had an instance of cfprefsd, launchd, distnoted, and com.apple.IconServicesAgent with IconServicesAgent being the "Grandaddy" of memory consumption. I used Activtiy monitor to kill all the launchd processes in the unused (not logged into) accounts followed by the rest and they never restarted.
Observation: For some reason the OS seems to erratically decide to launch or not launch all these other user accounts. Sometimes Activity Monitor will just show me and the normal system accounts on the sytem, other times it appears to be more or less a crap shoot as to what processes have been started under what users name.
For item 2, normally 10.9.2 was showing about 2.1G of RAM in use now it's running about 2.4-2.5GB. All that I typically have running is Safari and Mail and thats when I noticed this increase.
Item 3 is just an observation, but it tells me the CPU is doing a lot more work to do the same things it did before.
For item 4, I'd heard of this before but I'd never seen it, until now. If external drives are connected to the system and the system goes to sleep, when you wake it up the OS will say the drive and it's volumes were incorrectly ejected. This happens erratically on USB drives. To simulate it I set the sleep interval at 3 minutes and let it go to sleep several times. Sometimes the drives would be there, sometimes I'd get the unmounted message. I should also note that the first time I rebooted Mavericks after the update it didn't see my Firewire external drive but has since then.
I noticed item 5 after using Safari and Mail for a while. The system more or less came to a crawl, fans came on high speed, Perfomance Probe was showing about 3GB of RAM used (RED) with the other 1GB completely blue, which means it's not active but swappable. This was weird because I'd never seen the system "pegged" like this. Usually there's free memory showing up. I opened up Activity Monitor to get the details and it showed that about 1GB of RAM was compressed. This has never happened before. The only things in use were Mail and Safari, and I'd guess I was probably using Safari to go to weather.com.
I have never had or witnessed any of these problems before.

An update:
For item 1, I suspect that when the other accounts were used, the users left them in the modes to reopen applications etc when restarting. This is a laptop and it's shared in the field by several people. By getting everyone to log into the accounts and turn that feature off, it limited the number of automatic processes that would restart. By opening up Activity Monitor, and first killing launchd for each of these unused accounts, then the rest of the processes, it seems to have cleared that problem up. This system has been through several OS upgrades so it's quite possible some people may not have used this thing since Lion or Mountain Lion were on it. I am, of course, talking about killing launchd associated with people not using the system, not an active version of it.
As far as items 2, 3, and 5 go, any time Safari needs to run some video this problem seems to surface. It doesn't seem to happen with other browsers.

View for MARA+MARC+MBEW

hi ,
      currently i am selecting data joining MARA,MARC,MBEW . it is giving hudge performance problem .
ON MARA~MATNR EQ MARC~MATNR
         INNER JOIN MBEW
      ON MARC~MANDT EQ MBEW~MANDT
     AND MARC~MATNR EQ MBEW~MATNR
     AND MARC~WERKS EQ MBEW~BWKEY
does any body know any database view that i can use instead.
Please let me also know if there is any other way to enhance performance.

hey buddy!!!
u r using joins, so u go better for views.
i mean create views using se11 . u can go for maintenance view
now wat happen is tat when u create the views the data gets fetched for only those fields which u have requested. which does not happen when u create joins.
so go for views
maybe tat will reduce ur performance prob.
Hope it will help you!!!
Thanks & Regards,
Punit Raval

Lenovo G580 Performance problem

Hi everyone,i think i have performance problems with my Lenovo IdeaPad G580 Dark Metal
-Intel Core i7 3632QM Ivy Bridge
-RAM 4GB
-NVIDIA GeForce GT635M 2GB
-Windows 8
And fps in Far Cry 3 is only about 30 on low settings
Need for speed The Run is about 35 on medium settings
So, it is normal or i really have performance probs ?

Thanks for advice,i will upgrade ram later but can i update my graphics card from Nvidia experience ? or only from Lenovo website ?

Problem in the select query

Hi.
here i have to make the code in exit_saplv56u_004 in include zxv56u11.
there are tables defined in itself.
i have written like this,but not sure about the table updation and the declaration part:
here i am writing this code in exit_sap
TABLES:VTTP,VTTK,LIKP,KNA1.
TABLES:ZOTC_SHPMNT_RTE.
DATA:x_vttp type vttpvb,
       x_vttk type vttkvb,
       X_LIKP TYPE LIKP,
       X_KNA1 TYPE KNA1,
       X_ZOTC_SHPMNT_RTE TYPE ZOTC_SHPMNT_RTE,
       t_temp type vttk,       feels that declaration iswrong
       x_temp type vttk.      this table andwork area will be used to finally update vttk table feilds
READ TABLE I_XVTTK INTO X_VTTK INDEX 1.
READ TABLE I_XVTTP INTO X_VTTP INDEX 1.
CLEAR X_LIKP.
SELECT SINGLE *     FROM LIKP
                      INTO X_LIKP
                      WHERE VBELN = X_VTTP-VBELN.
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
      CLEAR X_KNA1.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM KNA1              i jus need 2-3 feilds so howcan i avoid the performance prob
       INTO X_KNA1
    WHERE KUNNR = X_LIKP-KUNNR.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
CLEAR X_TEMP.
     SELECT SINGLE * FROM ZOTC_SHPMNT_RTE INTO table t_TEMP
     WHERE SHTYP = X_VTTK-SHTYP
     AND   LAND1 = X_KNA1-LAND1
     AND   BLAND = X_KNA1-REGIO
     AND   ZONE1 = X_KNA1-LZONE.
     IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
       IF T_TEMP[] IS INITIAL.
       READ TABLE T_TEMP INTO X_TEMP.     i want to create a temp internal table
       ELSE.
       SELECT SINGLE * FROM ZOTC_SHPMNT_RTE INTO TABLE t_TEMP
     WHERE SHTYP = X_VTTK-SHTYP
     AND   LAND1 = X_KNA1-LAND1
     AND   BLAND = X_KNA1-REGIO.
       IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
          READ TABLE T_TEMP INTO X_TEMP.
          IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
         MODIFY vttk FROM t_TEMP.       here i want to modify the feilds like vttk-route and vttk-tdlnr
         ENDIF.
         ENDIF.
         ENDIF.
endif.
endif.

First declare a types structure with this 3 variables u want...
now declare a work area(X_KNA1) of this types structure.
And
SELECT SINGLE LAND1 REGIO LZONE FROM KNA1
INTO X_KNA1
WHERE KUNNR = X_LIKP-KUNNR.

Iphone4 out memory since photo stream "showed up"?

Ive recently had performance probs on my iphone4. could photo stream cause this? How do I troubleshoot and fix?

I can’t tell you how to solve your iCloud 3.x issues. Heck, I don’t think they’re even solvable.
But if you had a previous version of iCloud that was working correctly then I can definitely tell you how to solve the “iCloud Photo Stream is not syncing to my Windows 7 PC” problem. …without even a re-boot.
Log out of iCloud 3.0 and uninstall it.
Open My Computer and then open your C:\ drive. Go to Tools/Folder Options and click on the View tab. Select the “Show hidden…” radio button and click on OK.
Open the Users folder.
Open your user folder
Open ProgramData (previously hidden folder)
Open the Apple folder – not the Apple Computer folder.
Open the Installer Cache folder
In Details view sort on Name
Open the folder for the newest entry for iCloud Control Panel 2.x – probably 2.1.2.8 dated 4/25/2013
Right click on iCloud64.msi and select Install.
When finished, the synching between iCloud and your PC will be back to working perfectly as before the 3.0 fiasco. The pictures will be synched to the same Photostream folder as before the “upgrade”. Now all you need to do is wait until Apple/Microsoft get this thing fixed and working before you try the 3.x upgrade again.
I think the iCloud 3.0 software was written by the same folks who wrote healthcare.gov with the main difference being that healthcare.gov might eventually be made to work.
For those of you who hate to go backwards, think of it as attacking to the rear. Which would you rather have, the frustration of no synching or everything working on an older version?
Good luck…

Regarding change pointers for HRMD_A

Hi Abapers,
I need to distribute changes to HR master data to a middleware system. hence i have activated the change pointers for the message type: HRMD_A. now my idoc is populating the infotype segments whenever it is changed with all fields.
But a particular change (on an infotype) should be sent individually in two different runs of RBDMIDOC run to the middleware. Ex: Vendor A needs changes to be sent to it on a weekly basis whereas Vendor B needs changes to be sent to it on a biweekly basis. When an employee X has a change on infotype 2, this change should be sent to middleware in both instances separately in different IDOCS at different times when RBDMIDOC program is run (by capturing change pointers pertinent to the message type of the particular vendor).
What are the changes required for ALE config.? Do i need to create a new message type for vendor B and configure. Please help.
Thanks.

Hi sudarshan,
Yuo need to create Z program to trigger IDOC.
As you need to set read status of change pointer as X after yuo send it to both system.
So you need to create Z table to keep track of this whether you have send to sys a or Sys B..
If you willl not update read status in will cause performance prob.
Hope this helps.
Dhiraj.

Best approach to take for TWEAKING (automating) backing audio on the fly?

I want to be able to turn a knob every now and again and have it tweak an aspect (FX or whatever) of an element of my backing audio. My dillema is that I know the Playback and Loopback plug-ins are CPU monsters and I'm afraid to have multiple loopbacks or playbacks running in the background so that I can tweak them.
Is either the Loopback or the Playback plug-in less CPU intensive to where I could have multiple instances running in the background?
Having just 1 playback plug in running in the background isn't exactly ideal for tweaking (considering they're will be a lot of elements stacked into that playback audio--ie drums, bass, chords or whatever). I'd like to be able to tweak JUST the backing drums or JUST the backing bass. I realize this would take MULTIPLE loopbacks or playbacks.
Could anyone impart some words of wisdom? It's always greatly appreciated!

Hi
I'm not altogether sure playback is a CPU monster - I've been using up to five instances of it per set (song) and tweaking each one, and the overall mix between them on the fly, exactly as you describe, and I've not noticed any related performance probs in over a year of regular gigging - and if you check out my spec, you'll see I have a very basic macbook.
The only hit I noticed was that I originally put all my sets (songs) into one big concert, and that did hit my RAM, making the response to the transport buttons lag. Once I split them up into separate concerts, each containing about 10-12 sets, that problem disappeared.
Obviously to minimise CPU hit, I set up aux channels for reverb, compression etc as is standard practice.

Performance Prob on 5600 TD256

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for