Performance tunning for select statements using likp lips and vbrp

Dear all,
  I have a report where i am using select statements using first on likp the for all entries of likp  i am taking data from lips and then for all entries in lips i am taking data from vbrp by matching VGBEL and VGPOS. Now the problem is that when it fetches data from vbrp it is taking lot of time around 13mins. to fetch data from vbrp. How can i overcome the problem.
regards
Amit

Hi,
there is also no secondary index for preceding document in VBFA table.
You will also have to create it here.
Regards,
Przemysław

Similar Messages

  • Need to Improve  pefromance for select statement using MSEG table

    Hi all,
    We are using a select statement using MSEG table
    which takes a very long time to run the program which is scheduled in back ground.
    Please see the history below.;
    1) Previously this program was using SELECT-ENDSELECT statement inside the loop i.e.
    LOOP AT I_MCHB.
    To get Material Doc. Details
          SELECT MBLNR
                 MJAHR
                 ZEILE INTO (MSEG-MBLNR,MSEG-MJAHR,MSEG-ZEILE)
                 UP TO 1 ROWS
                 FROM MSEG
                WHERE CHARG EQ I_MCHB-CHARG
                 AND  MATNR EQ I_MCHB-MATNR
                 AND  WERKS EQ I_MCHB-WERKS
                 AND  LGORT EQ I_MCHB-LGORT.
          ENDSELECT.
    Endloop.
    The program was taking 1 hr  for  20 k data
    2)The above statement was replaced by ALL ENTRIES to remove the SELECT-ENDSELECT from the loop.
    ***GET MATERIAL DOC NUMBER AND FINANCIAL YEAR DETAILS FROM MSEG TABLE
        SELECT MBLNR
               MJAHR
               ZEILE
               MATNR
               CHARG
               WERKS
               LGORT
                   INTO TABLE I_MSEG
                   FROM   MSEG
                   FOR ALL ENTRIES IN I_MCHB
                   WHERE CHARG EQ I_MCHB-CHARG
                   AND   MATNR EQ I_MCHB-MATNR
                   AND   WERKS EQ I_MCHB-WERKS
                   AND   LGORT EQ I_MCHB-LGORT.
    3)After getting the further technical analysis from BASIS team , And with the suggestion to optimize the program by changing the INDEX RANGE SCAN to
           MSEG~M.
    SELECT MBLNR
               MJAHR
               ZEILE
               MATNR
               CHARG
               WERKS
               LGORT
                   INTO TABLE  I_MSEG
                   FROM   MSEG
                   FOR ALL ENTRIES IN I_MCHB
                   WHERE MATNR EQ I_MCHB-MATNR
                   AND   WERKS EQ I_MCHB-WERKS
                   AND   LGORT EQ I_MCHB-LGORT.
    At present the program is taking 3 to 4 hrs in back ground .
    The table is complete table scan using index
    MSEG~M.
    Please suggest to improve the performance of this
    many many thanks
    deepak

    The benchmark should be the join, and I can not see how any of your solutions can be faster than the join
    SELECT   .....
                  INTO TABLE  ....
                  UP TO 1 ROWS
                  FROM mchb as a
                  INNER JOIN mseg as b
                  ON    amatnr EQ bmatnr
                  AND  awerks  EQ bwerks
                  AND  algort    EQ blgort
                  And   acharg  EQ bcharg
                  WHERE a~ ....
    The WHERE condition must come from the select on MCHB, the field list from the total results
    you want.
    If you want to compare, must compare your solutions plus the select to fill I_MCHB.
    Siegfried
    Edited by: Siegfried Boes  on Dec 20, 2007 2:28 PM

  • How to get accurate values for select statement using single column

    Hi All,
    Below is my query which runs fine
    Select Distinct Top 4
    FiscalYearId,
    FiscalMonthOfYearId
    From ODS.Common.tODS_Date
    Inner Join
    UTL.Utility.tUTL_ProcessDate
    On tODS_Date.DateShort < tUTL_ProcessDate.ProcessDate
    And tUTL_ProcessDate.DatabaseName = 'ODS'
    Order By
    FiscalYearId Desc,
    FiscalMonthOfYearId Desc
    Below is the generate output
    FiscalYearId FiscalMonthOfYearId
    2014 2
    2014 1
    2013 12
    2013 11
    But i want to use this query in one of my where clause condition as its being used in the where clause it can only return 1 row.So, i tried something like this
    Select Distinct Top 4
    FiscalMonthOfYearId
    From ODS.Common.tODS_Date
    Inner Join
    UTL.Utility.tUTL_ProcessDate
    On tODS_Date.DateShort < tUTL_ProcessDate.ProcessDate
    And tUTL_ProcessDate.DatabaseName = 'ODS'
    Order By
    FiscalMonthOfYearId Desc
    And the result set of this one gives me the output like
    FiscalMonthOfYearId
    12
    11
    10
    9
    Which is not correct,( if you see the result set above). 
    Can someone please help me with any ides on this.

    If you want to use this query in the WHERE clause, then use it with EXISTS option which allows to return more than 1 column. 
    For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Becker's Law
    My blog
    My TechNet articles

  • 'Missing select' error for update statement using WITH clause

    Hi,
    I am getting the below error for update statement using WITH clause
    SQL Error: ORA-00928: missing SELECT keyword
      UPDATE A
      set A.col1 = 'val1'
         where
      A.col2 IN (
      WITH D AS
      SELECT col2 FROM
      (SELECT col2, MIN(datecol) col3 FROM DS
      WHERE <conditions>
        GROUP BY PATIENT) D2
      WHERE
      <conditions on A.col4 and D2.col3>

    Hi,
    The format of a query using WITH is:
    WITH  d  AS
        SELECT  ...  -- sub_query
    SELECT  ...   -- main query
    You don't have a main query.  The keyword FROM has to come immediately after the right ')' that ends the last WITH clause sub-query.
    That explains the problem based on what you posted.  I can't tell if the real problem is in the conditions that you didn't post.
    I hope this answers your question.
    If not, post a complete test script that people can run to re-create the problem and test their ideas.  Include a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only) for all the tables involved, and the results you want from that data.
    In the case of a DML operation (such as UPDATE) the sample data should show what the tables are like before the DML, and the results will be the contents of the changed table(s) after the DML.
    Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
    Always say what version of Oracle you're using (e.g. 11.2.0.2.0).
    See the forum FAQ: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002

  • Timesten create a lock for select statement through sqldev

    When use ttisql connect to TimesTen Release 7.0.6.15.0 at autocommit=1, there is no lock for select statement.
    but when I use sql developer (driver is ttjdbc5.jar, regardless of version) to connect, even with autocommit=1, there will be locks for select statement.
    Is it a bug? How can I achieve the same no locks for select statement through sql developer?Thanks.

    -your update tells me that you are connected to a remote timesten data store using the client driver
    -the ttXactAdmin output indicates that SqlNavigator has a shared lock on the database itself: this will not interfere with anybody else' read operations, and I believe that until such time as you actually attempt some kind of DML against the data store that th IX lock on the database lock will not interfere with any other DML either.
    -a shared database lock will always be acquired for any transaction in TimesTen. You can test this for yourself from ttisql: set autocommit off, perform a simple update and do not commit the transaction. Then open a separate session and execute ttxactadmin - you will the IX database lock as well as the various locks on tables and indexes.
    -I believe this pretty much proves my original thinking: that sqlDeveloper attaches to TimesTen in transaction mode. However, the IX lock on the database will not interfere with anybody else's work and should not be a problem.

  • How to write SELECT statement using tables ekko,ekpo and eket?

    Hi,
    I got a problem in  performance tuning using below tables?
    how to write SELECT statement using tables EKKO,EKPO and EKET and in conditon ( WHERE clause)  use only fields 
                        ekko~ebeln       IN ebeln
                       ekko~loekz       EQ ' '
                       ekko~lifnr       IN lifnr
                       ekko~ekorg       IN ekorg
                      ekko~ekgrp       IN ekgrp          
                       ekpo~werks       IN werks
                       ekpo~pstyp       EQ  '3'
                       ekpo~loekz       EQ  space
                       ekpo~elikz       EQ  space
                       ekpo~menge       NE  0
                     eket~rsnum       NE space.
    Thanks in Advance.
    bye.

    Hi,
    ekko~ebeln IN ebeln
    ekko~loekz EQ ' '
    ekko~lifnr IN lifnr
    ekko~ekorg IN ekorg
    ekko~ekgrp IN ekgrp
    ekpo~werks IN werks
    ekpo~pstyp EQ '3'
    ekpo~loekz EQ space
    ekpo~elikz EQ space
    ekpo~menge NE 0          " Remove this from where clause
    eket~rsnum NE space.    " Remove this from where clause
    ' instead delete the entries after fetching into the table
    DELETE it_itab WHERE menge EQ '0' AND rsnum EQ ' '.
    Regards
    Bala Krishna

  • Create object type from multiple tables for select statement

    Hi there,
    I have 3 tables as given below and I wish to create an object type to group selected columns as 'attribute' from multiple tables. 
    I need to create 2 input parameters to pass in - 'attribute' and 'attribute value'  in PL/SQL and these 2 parameters will be
    passing in with 'column name' and 'column value'.  e.g. 'configuration' - the column name, 'eval' - the column value.
    Then, the PL/SQL will execute the select statement with the column and column value provided to output the record. 
    Pls advise and thank you.
    table ccitemnumber
    name                           null     type                                                                                                   
    ccitemnumber                   not null varchar2(20)                                                                                                                                                                                    
    configuration                           varchar2(20)
    item_type                               varchar2(30)
    table productmodel
    productmodelnumber             not null varchar2(6)                                                                                            
    description                             varchar2(60)  
    accesstimems                            number                                                                                                 
    numberofheads                           varchar2(2)
    generation                              varchar2(10)
    numberofdiscs                           varchar2(2)
    factoryapplication                      varchar2(150)
    table topmodel
    stmodelnumber                  not null varchar2(30)                                                                                           
    productfamily                           varchar2(60
    formfactor                              varchar2(10)                                                                                           
    modelheight                             varchar2(10)                                                                                           
    formattedcapacity                       number                                                                                                 
    formattedcapacity_uom                   varchar2(20)
    object type in database
    configuration                           varchar2(20)
    item_type                               varchar2(30)
    numberofheads                           varchar2(2)
    generation                              varchar2(10)
    numberofdiscs                           varchar2(2)
    factoryapplication                      varchar2(150)
    modelheight                             varchar2(10)
    formattedcapacity                       number                                                                                                 
    formattedcapac

    user12043838 wrote:
    Reason to do this as these fields are required to be grouped together as they are created in different tables. They are treated as 'attribute' (consists of many columns) of the part number. So, the PL/SQL is requested to design in a way able for user to pass in the column name and column value or part number, then the select statement should be able to query for the records. Another reason is a new column can be added easily without keep modifying those effected programs. Reuseable too.This basically equates to ... hard to code, hard to maintain, and poor performance.
    Are you really sure you want to do this? This isn't going to be easy-street as you seem to think it is, but it's a one way street to a poorly performing system with security vulnerabilities (google SQL Injection).
    I would highly recommend you reconsider your design decision here.

  • Create new tag for selected text using API?

    Hello,
    I want to add new tag for the selected text just like 'Create Tag from selection' .
    is it possible to create tag for selected text using acrobat api?
         please,help me.

    As per sample of snippetRunner for adding tag for selected text.
    I tried below code
    PDPage pg;
    AVDoc avDoc = AVAppGetActiveDoc();
    PDDoc pd = AVDocGetPDDoc(avDoc);
        pg = PDDocAcquirePage(pd, 0);
    ASAtom theSelectionType = AVDocGetSelectionType(avDoc);
    if (theSelectionType == ASAtomFromString("Text")){
        PDTextSelect ts = static_cast<PDTextSelect>(AVDocGetSelection(avDoc));
        PDSTreeRoot pdsTreeRoot;
        CosObj pageObj = PDPageGetCosObj (pg);
        PDSElement newElem;
        PDSElementCreate(pd, &newElem);
        char buf1[64];
        strcpy (buf1, "A new structure element");
        // set its type as "Document" standard type
        PDSElementSetType(newElem, ASAtomFromString ("Document"));
        // set its title
        PDSElementSetTitle(newElem, reinterpret_cast<const ASUns8*> (buf1), strlen(buf1));
        PDSTreeRootInsertKid (pdsTreeRoot, aElem, kPDSAfterLast);
        PDSElementInsertMCAsKid // here something i have to add
    If i have PDTextSelect how i can add tag for selected text.like user add tag using "CreateTagForSelectedText" option.
    please,help me.
    thanks.

  • Converting a delete statement using VPD policies and context

    Hello,
    I'm trying to convert a delete statement in a update statement using VPD policies and context.
    +/* Supose the user 'user1' already exists. This is an application user */+
    conn user1/pwd
    create table user1.test_a (
    id                number(4),
    description       varchar2(100),
    deleted           number(1)
    +);+
    alter table user1.test_a add constraint test_a_pk primary key (id);
    insert into user1.test_a (1, 'abc', 0);
    insert into user1.test_a (2, 'def', 0);
    commit;
    I'd like to convert each physical deletion into a logical deletion: statements like "delete from user1.test_a where id = 1" must be converted into "update user1.test_a set deleted = 1 where id = 1".
    I've found the following way: I will create a policy to avoid physical deletion. Additionally, the policy function should update the deletion flag too.
    conn user1/pwd
    +/* Create context package */+
    create or replace package user1.pkg_security_context is
    procedure p_set_ctx(
    i_test_a_id      in   user1.test_a.id   %type
    +);+
    end;
    +/+
    create or replace package body user1.pkg_security_context is
    procedure p_set_ctx (
    i_test_a_id      in   user1.test_a.id   %type
    +) is+
    begin
    dbms_session.set_context( 'user1_ctx', 'test_a_id', i_test_a_id );
    end;
    end;
    +/+
    show errors
    +/* Create trigger to set the context before deletion */+
    create or replace trigger user1.test_a_bef_trg
    before delete on user1.test_a
    for each row
    declare
    pragma autonomous_transaction;
    begin
    -- only commits the preceding update, not the delete that fired the trigger.
    commit;
    user1.pkg_security_context.p_set_ctx( :old.id );
    end;
    +/+
    show errors
    create context user1_ctx using user1.pkg_security_context;
    +/* Policy function */+
    create or replace function user1.f_policy_chk_dels (
    object_schema in   varchar2,
    object_name   in   varchar2
    +) return varchar2+
    is
    out_string                 varchar2(400)   default '1=2 ';
    +/*+
    * out_string is the return value.
    *  - 'WHERE 1=2' means 'nothing to access'
    begin
    if ( loc_logged_usr_authorized > 0 ) then
    +/*+
    * Set the flag deleted to 1
    update user1.test_a set deleted = 1 where id = sys_context( 'user1_ctx', 'test_a_id' );
    out_string := out_string || 'or 1=1 ';
    end if;
    return out_string;
    end;
    +/+
    show errors
    +/*+
    * Create policy
    begin
    dbms_rls.add_policy(
    object_schema   => 'user1'                   ,
    object_name     => 'test_a'                  ,
    policy_name     => 'policy_chk_dels'         ,
    function_schema => 'user1'                   , -- function schema
    policy_function => 'f_policy_chk_dels'       , -- policy function
    statement_types => 'DELETE'
    +);+
    end;
    +/+
    When I try to delete a record of the table test_a:
    conn user1/pwd
    SQL> delete from ilogdia.oplsimulaciones sim       where sim.id = 9999;
    +0 rows deleted+
    No rows has been deleted, but the update stmt does not work. That means, the "deleted" flag has not been updated.
    Any ideas?
    Thank you in advance.
    Marco A. Serrano
    Edited by: albrotar on Oct 15, 2012 8:42 AM
    Edited by: albrotar on Oct 15, 2012 8:42 AM
    Edited by: albrotar on Oct 15, 2012 8:43 AM

    The policy function is applied once per statement execution. The policy function executes first and the UPDATE statement, presumably, updates no rows because the context is not yet populated. The row-level populates the context (I'm assuming that your session can even see context values populated by an autonomous transaction-- I would guess it could but I'd have to test that) after the UPDATE statement is already complete. The COMMIT in the row-level trigger is also pointless-- it only applies to changes made by the current autonomous transaction, of which there are none-- it cannot apply to changes made in other autonomous transactions. Declaring the row-level trigger to use autonomous transactions doesn't seem to accomplish anything other than to open the question of whether the values set in the context by the autonomous transaction are visible in the caller's transaction.
    Even if this, somehow, did work, using autonomous transactions would be a very bad idea since Oracle is free to roll-back a partially executed statement (and the work done by its triggers) and re-execute it. Oracle does that with some regularity to maintain write consistency.
    Justin

  • Face time with wifi only.  I have a 4Gs iPhone traveling to Japan.  Can I use face time with another 4Gs or IMacback in the States using just wifi and with I have my Celluar Data and Data Roaming off?

    Face time with wifi only.  I have a 4Gs iPhone traveling to Japan.  Can I use face time with another 4Gs or IMacback in the States using just wifi and with I have my Celluar Data and Data Roaming off?

    Thanks,  After changing my settings in face time per your suggestion, (it needed to be done),  I turned off cellular data and data roaming and made a call using face time.  It worked!  Great way to stay in touch while overseas without the need for those egregious phone data plans. 

  • Performance Tuning -To find the execution time for Select Statement

    Hi,
    There is a program that takes 10 hrs to execute. I need tune its performance. The program is basically reading few tables like KNA1,ANLA,ANLU,ADRC etc and updates to Custom table. I did my analysis and found few performance techniques for ABAP coding.
    Now my problem is, to get this object approved I need to submit the execution statistics to client.I checked both ST05 and SE30. I heard of a Tcode where we can execute a select statement and note its time, then modify and find its improved Performance. Can anybody suggest me on this.
    Thanks,
    Rajani.

    Hi,
    This is documentation regarding performance analysis. Hope this will be useful
    It is a general practice to use           Select  *  from <database>…     This statement populates all the values of the structure in the database.
    The effect is many fold:-
    •     It increases the time to retrieve data from database
    •     There is large amount of unused data in memory
    •     It increases the processing time from work area or internal tables
    It is always a good practice to retrieve only the required fields. Always use the syntax      Select f1  f2  …  fn  from <database>…      
    e.g.     Do not use the following statement:-
         Data: i_mara like mara occurs 0 with header line.
         Data: i_marc like marc occurs 0 with header line.
         Select * from mara
              Into table i_mara
              Where matnr in s_matnr.
         Select * from marc
              Into table i_marc
              For all entries in i_mara
              Where matnr eq i_mara-matnr.
         Instead use the following statement:-
                                       Data: begin of i_mara occurs 0,
                                            Matnr like mara-matnr,
                                                  End of i_mara.
         Data: begin of i_marc occurs 0,
              Matnr like marc-matnr,
                                            Werks like marc-werks,
                                                 End of i_marc.
         Select matnr from mara
              Into table i_mara
              Where matnr in s_matnr.

  • Advice required on a select statement using "FOR ALL ENTRIES"

    Hi,
    this is really intresting ...
    I have a small requirement where in i have to find out
    the valid entries in my internal table (T_MATNR) by using a select statement to a check table (MARA) which has all the fields present in the internal table T_MATNR.
    Select statement is
    SELECT MATNR
           MTART
           from MARA
           for all entries in T_MATNR
           into table T_MATNR
           where matnr eq T_MATNR-MATNR.
    If you observe the itab in the option 'FOR ALL ENTRIES' and the destination table is the same. I want to know whether this is correct? will it cause any performance issue? right now this statement is working fine for me.

    Hi,
    U have to use
    SELECT MATNR
    MTART
    from MARA
    <b>into table I_MATNR(different table)</b>
    for all entries in T_MATNR
    where matnr eq T_MATNR-MATNR.
    If u r specifying both same table name then for what entries it will retrieve, if u have alreay selected some entries and appending u can use
    SELECT MATNR
    MTART
    from MARA
    <b>into table T_MATNR</b>where matnr eq T_MATNR-MATNR.
    then
    SELECT MATNR
    MTART
    from MARA
    <b>appending table T_MATNR</b>
    for all entries in T_MATNR
    where matnr eq T_MATNR-MATNR.
    In this way u can do.
    Hope u got it.

  • Performance Issue in Select Statement (For All Entries)

    Hello,
    I have a report where i have two select statement
    First Select Statement:
    Select A B C P Q R
         from T1 into Table it_t1
              where ....
    Internal Table it_t1 is populated with 359801 entries through this select statement.
    Second Select Statement:
    Select A B C X Y Z
         from T2 in it_t2 For All Entries in it_t1
              where A eq it_t1-A
                 and B eq it_t1-B
                 and C eq it_t1-C
    Now Table T2 contains more than 10 lac records and at the end of select statement it_t2 is populated with 844003 but it takes a lot of time (15 -20 min) to execute second select statement.
    Can this code be optimized?
    Also i have created respective indexes on table T1 and T2 for the fields in Where Condition.
    Regards,

    If you have completed all the steps mentioned by others, in the above thread, and still you are facing issues then,.....
    Use a Select within Select.
    First Select Statement:
    Select A B C P Q R package size 5000
         from T1 into Table it_t1
              where ....
    Second Select Statement:
    Select A B C X Y Z
         from T2 in it_t2 For All Entries in it_t1
              where A eq it_t1-A
                 and B eq it_t1-B
                 and C eq it_t1-C
    do processing........
    endselect
    This way, while using for all entries on T2, your it_t1, will have limited number of entries and thus the 2nd select will be faster.
    Thanks,
    Juwin

  • Performance Issie in SQL Statement Using Hints

    Hi,
    I am using Oracle version 10G.
    I am using a INSERT statement as:
    INSERT /*+ PARALLEL (TEST,4) */ INTO TEST(COL1,COL2,COL3) SELECT COL1,COL2,COL3 FROM DUMMY;
    For increasing the Performance I am using the above statement.
    Will the usage of Hints increase the Performance?
    Any help will be highly needful.
    Thanks and Regards

    user598986 wrote:
    I am using Oracle version 10G.
    I am using a INSERT statement as:
    INSERT /*+ PARALLEL (TEST,4) */ INTO TEST(COL1,COL2,COL3) SELECT COL1,COL2,COL3 FROM DUMMY;
    For increasing the Performance I am using the above statement.
    Will the usage of Hints increase the Performance?The way you're asking the question suggests that you're not sure what this particular hint is supposed to imply.
    Using this hint suggests that you want to take advantage of direct-path parallel DML operations. Note that you explicitly need to enable parallel DML in your session, it is disabled by default, because it has some significant implications and restrictions. You should think about parallelizing the query on DUMMY, too, if it is not marked as PARALLEL in the dictionary, because otherwise you're combining a parallel DML operation with a serial query which might not be that efficient.
    Note that there is no general answer to the question if this particular hint will actually increase the performance of the DML statement. There are many things to consider, among them are if your system scales reasonably with parallel operations and if the underlying object structure actually allows to benefit from the parallel operation. There are cases where a serial operation might be faster than a parallel operation.
    For more information about direct-path and parallel execution, its implications and restrictions, see the documentation:
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28286/statements_9014.htm#i2163698
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28313/usingpe.htm#CACEJACE
    You can use the EXPLAIN PLAN and the DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY function to get the execution plan of your statement that shows you what kind of parallel operations the optimizer estimates to perform.
    Regards,
    Randolf
    Oracle related stuff blog:
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
    SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
    http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

  • Runtime error for SELECT statement

    Hi All,
    I have written a SELECT statement as follows in my code.
    select budat pernr aufnr vornr from AFRU
    into corresponding fields of table it_vornr
    for all entries in it_cats_tmp
    where budat = it_cats_tmp-workdate
    and pernr = it_cats_tmp-pernr
    and aufnr = it_cats_tmp-rnplnr.
    The table IT-CATS_TMP is having around 3000+ lines.
    When control moves to this statement, the system is throwing Runtime error or its taking around 30 minutes time to execute.
    If i query the same table (AFRU) in SE11 for the same set of conditions, the table displays relevent data immediately.
    What might be the reason for this delay/Runtime Error?
    Shall i need to change the syntax for better performance?
    Your guidelines are highly appreciated......
    Regards
    Pavan

    Hi
    1. Try to put WHERE conditions for KEY FIELDS.
    Solution: Create a RANGE for the key fields & put that in SELECT Query.
    DATA: gr_rueck TYPE RANGES OF afru-rueck.
    SELECT .. WHERE rueck IN gr_rueck.
    2. Avoid using CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE in SELECT.
    Solution: Change internal table fields ORDER.
    TYPES:
    BEGIN OF TY_VORNR,
      budat TYPE ..
      pernr TYPE ..
      aufnr TYPE ..
      vornr TYPE ..
      ... " Other fields
    END OF TY_VORNR.
    SELECT .. INTO TABLE IT_VORNR ...

Maybe you are looking for