Photostream sharing across different firmware versions

I've got a weird problem here:
Person A has an iPad with iOS7
Person B has an iPad with iOS6
Person A creates a photo stream and shares it with Person B - ensuring they turn on "Subscribers Can Post"
Person B joins the stream just fine (and can view photos already there), but cannot add photos to the stream
OK, now the other way around:
Person B creates a photo stream and shares it with Person A - "Subscribers Can Post" is not available as they are on iOS6
Person A joins the stream just fine (and can view photos already there), but cannot add photos to the stream
I'm guessing that the problem here is the server-side validation of whether the "Subscribers can post" option is switched on or not. As Person B has only iOS6 (and therefore the option is not available), it seems to me that this validation fails, meaning each ipad thinks that do not have permission to add photos to the stream.
Can anyone direct me in setting up a collaborative photostream between these devices?

Hello Breame,
Thank you for providing so much detail regarding the Shared Photo Streams you are creating. iOS 7 is required of both participants for a collaborative Shared Photo Stream:
If I am using iOS 6, can I still view photos and videos contributed by subscribers who are using iOS 7?
If you are using iOS 6, you will be able to view photos contributed by subscribers to a shared photo stream by following the steps below. Video sharing and the ability to contribute to other people's shared photo streams requires iOS 7.
You can find the full article here:
iCloud: Troubleshooting iCloud Photo Sharing and Shared Photo Streams
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4379
Thank you for using Apple Support Communities.
Best,
Sheila M.

Similar Messages

LWAPP to CAPWAP across different software versions. ?

Hi guys,
I was wondering if someone could clarify what happens when you have controllers live on two different software versions..
We have 4 controllers.. 2 on version 4.2, which APs currently register to with LWAPP and 2 new ones on version 7..
On WCS, I have moved an AP currrently registered on a version 4.2 controller and reassigned it to the newer controller ( ver 7 ).
The AP then reboots and I can see in the event logs that it comes back up on LWAPP after resolving the entry CISCO-LWAPP-CONTROLLER.
On WCS, the AP shows as registered back on the old Controller ( ver 4.2 ) but the Primary and Secondary Controllers are still pointing to newer ones ( ver7 )..
According to the Cisco document, the transfer from LWAPP to CAPWAP should be seemless, so is this a problem migrating across different software versions. ? Will the AP sort itself out eventually.
If I console into the AP and statically assign the new controller IP address, this forces the AP to download the newer software version ( after multiple auto reboots ) and it comes up on CAPWAP.. This shows that the path between the AP and controller is ok..
Ideally, Im hoping that I can simply reassign our current APs to the new controller ( and onto CAPWAP ) rather than having to console into all our remote APs and statically reconfigure them.. Not fun !!.
Any advice would be appreciated..
Thanks.
Jon.

Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for the reply..
Yes I agree that, once on version 7 it will perform a lookup for " cisco-capwap-controller ".. I forgot to say in my original post that I had already check this and it does resolve correctly to the two newer controller IPs.. If I console into the AP and manually define the newer controller IP address, it all goes through sucessfully and I can see the discovery and correct registration process in the logs
So we know that it kind of works but Im hoping that there is a simplier solution from within WCS where I can do all this remotely, rather than consoling into every AP locally.
Your suggestion of inputting the new controller IPs in WCS instead of the names sounds good however, it needs to be on version 7 first to be able to do this ? As you say, there is a field for this in version 4.2.... Looks like there is a bit of chicken and egg going on here !!.
Any other ideas or thoughts would be appreciated.
Many thanks.
Jon.

Sharing across different subnets

I have successfully connected a remote PC to my WRV54G using QuickVPN. That remote PC can ping computers across the VPN and those computers can likewise ping the remote PC. I have even successfully connected with Remote Desktop from that remote PC and controlled a computer across the VPN.
I can not, however, access shared resources on the computers across the VPN from the remote PC. (For the sake of discussion, assume that no firewalls exist in my scenario.) The remote PC has a local IP address of 192.168.1.4 and the computers behind the VPN have a local subnet of 10.109.220.0. I attempted to use the "run" command in windows and typed "//10.109.220.100/" from the remote PC to open the shared resources on the computer with that address. This did not work; I only received an error message. I didn't expect to be able to "see" computers across the VPN since the subnets are different, but I did expect to be able to access shared resources if I knew the IP addresses beforehand.
Can anyone help me?

Is the remote computer in the same Workgroup as the local computer? It might help if they are.

How to determine firmware version of brick?

Is it possible to determine the firmware version that the logic board has installed? I might be wrong about how the firmware operates, but the word 'firmware' to me usually implies flashing the BIOS. I know what version of 'firmware' the OS portion of the HDD has installed, but I'm not sure that it matches the BIOS and I'm still hoping I can revive the unit without repartitioning, etc. Background - I made the boneheaded mistake of trying to run sudo apt-get install -f <whatever> and was left with an SSH session where only bash built-ins would even run. No `ls`, no `cat`, no `sudo`. I tried to revive the system as best I could while the SSH session was still open using the errors reported and using this guide to abuse shell built-ins to recover a system in this state. But I ran out of time and had to close the connection (on a laptop). After this the system would power up but stay at white light LED indefinitely. So I popped the HDD into a spare linux machine and confirmed the drive looks fine - all data there and the OS RAID partitions were easily browsable. So I reimaged the OS RAID partition with rootfs.img from several different firmware versions (I really don't know whch one I was running as I've updated a few times but not sure when last), but still no luck. Am I wrong in assuming there's a BIOS update as well when we talk about 'firmware'? Am I missing some steps after reimaging the OS partition? Any help would be very appreciated.

I ended up soldering leads on the main board and captured the boot log. I managed to find only one other boot log to compare to (here) but comapring the two hasn't given me much insight. On the surface it seems like my issue is that the AHCI SATA loader is trying and failing to get port 0 to respond. I've posted the full boot log here, but I'll post the last bit here in hopes that someone can point me in the right direction. Thanks. Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
init_sata:
serdes: 24Mhz ref clk
Serdes 1 : CMU OK
Serdes 1 : Lane OK
Serdes 2 : CMU OK
Serdes 2 : Lane OK
cap 0x6f26ff81 port_map 0x3 n_ports 2
P#SERR 0x4050002
IS 0x0
Port 0 control: 0x300
Port 0 status: 0x123
P#SERR 0x0
IS 0x1
Port 1 control: 0x300
Port 1 status: 0x0
GHC 0x80000000
GHC 0x80000002
ahci_init_one: SUCCESS
SATA Controller Info:
AHCI 0001.0300 32 slots 2 ports 3 Gbps 0x3 impl SATA mode
flags: ncq stag pm led clo only pmp pio slum part
Enter start port: 0
Port 0 status: 123
cmd_slot = 0xb06000
Device not ready. BSY, DRQ or ERR in TFD!
Can not start port 0
timeout exit!
sataenv: GPT header not found
timeout exit!
sataenv: partition 7 not an environment
timeout exit!
sataenv: GPT header not found
timeout exit!
sataenv: partition 8 not an environment
timeout exit!
GPT header not found
Bad Magic Number
arg1 char: s
Barebox-C2K >/

No video across ICT when using different firmwares

Setup:
CM8.6 firmware 9-3-2-11
CM10.5 firmware 9-3-4-17
8941 phones
Tested different scenarios and seem unable to get 2 way video across the ICT.
If both phones are on 9-3-2-11 video works fine.
If both phones are on 9-3-4-17 video is one way
If both phones are on different firmware then video is one way.
Any offers?
Rich

Hi daGUY:
The only way I've been able to get around it is by selecting the video, extracting the audio, and then manually fading the audio in/out so that it matches the length of the video fade in/out. While this works, it's more work, takes more time, isn't as precise since I have to manually do it, and is totally unnecessary! The transitions are supposed to automatically apply to both the video AND its audio!
That's the right thing to do in this case (as you found out). But, it may be that this is a one time problem and the next video will work fine...
Sue

WRVS4400N hardware version 2 different firmware?

Hi,
I'm experiencing problems with this model, if I try to upgrade my router from 1.00.09 to the 1.1.3 that appears in Cisco web. It rejects the firmware claiming that it's wrong file format, I double check the integrity of the file and even upload the exact same file to a WRVS4400N hardware version 1 with no problems. At this point I guess if there's any alternative firmware version not available in any regular channel.
Any help would be more than welcome.
thanks in advance,
- jms

Hi Julio,
The firmware you used will not work with v2 hardware, only v1 & v1.1. Right now there's no new firmware for v2 posted on Cisco.com.
regards,
Brian

New firmware version is out for Megastick 128

There is a new firmware version (2.05) for the Megastick 1 (128). Get it from Megastick 1 firmware page

I upgraded it and didn’t see any major differences. However now there are many volume steps. Apart from that I noticed that when the radio is not tuned to a proper channel there is no noise, not a useful thing but those are the only differences I saw. Still cant record in 44k (records in 22k format). Anyone tried it and saw anything different ?
One other thing, I don’t know whether this existed in earlier firmware versions, when you have a normal file which is not an MP3 file with the .mp3 extension you cant turn it on. I came across this when I tried putting several non MP3 files (ogg ) having the mp3 extension after .ogg didn’t work to see whether they have added support for new standards (Slim chance but who knows… )

Problem with restore.I have a 2 gen running firmware version 4.2.1

Hello there !
Hopefully some smart persons here will be able to help me. First it has been awhile since i used my itune store because i didnt needed to and did a format of my computer after the last time i used it..so i had to upload my library etc and start from scratch. I downloaded a couple new games,everything was working fine..then when it came the time to sync and put these games on my ipod touch 2 gen the installation failed. I retried again and it keeps failing again and again so i choose to do a restore on it and expecting the problems would be solved. Problem wasnt not solved at all and it said an error (6) occured and i have the image on my ipod of the white cord trying to connect to itune store.
Restore doesnt work at all and it seems like my ipod is totally useless as i cant use it anymore. I did the diagnostic..it said no ipod were found. I also did the check up thing for the technician so ill paste it here maybe it will give some clues..
I have this error now as well... No iPod, iPhone, or iPad found. It also said secure link to itune store failed..not sure if these are all related to the same problems or all different at all..im clueless and need a generous soul to help me out.
Thank you tons for the help !
@Edit : Even with my other 2gen ipod i cant install these new games,it keeps failing as well..but at leasnt i havent done Restore on it yet and i fear to do it for reason you guys can guess.
Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Edition Service Pack 1 (Build 7601)
System manufacturer System Product Name
iTunes 10.3.1.55
QuickTime 7.6.9
FairPlay 1.11.17
Apple Application Support 1.5.2
iPod Updater Library 10.0d2
CD Driver 2.2.0.1
CD Driver DLL 2.1.1.1
Apple Mobile Device 3.4.1.2
Apple Mobile Device Driver 1.57.0.0
Bonjour 2.0.5.0 (214.3)
Gracenote SDK 1.8.2.457
Gracenote MusicID 1.8.2.89
Gracenote Submit 1.8.2.123
Gracenote DSP 1.8.2.34
iTunes Serial Number 00AAB2F80F513CD0
Current user is an administrator.
The current local date and time is 2011-07-17 18:45:37.
iTunes is not running in safe mode.
WebKit accelerated compositing is enabled.
HDCP is supported.
Core Media is supported.
Video Display Information
NVIDIA, NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
**** External Plug-ins Information ****
No external plug-ins installed.
**** Network Connectivity Tests ****
Network Adapter Information
Adapter Name:     {B00FE55A-1662-4EE9-B880-6B076869B9F8}
Description:     Contrôleur Atheros L2 Fast Ethernet 10/100Base-T
IP Address:     192.168.2.10
Subnet Mask:     255.255.255.0
Default Gateway:     192.168.2.1
DHCP Enabled:     Yes
DHCP Server:     192.168.2.1
Lease Obtained:     Sun Jul 17 17:51:16 2011
Lease Expires:     Wed Jul 20 17:51:16 2011
DNS Servers:     192.168.2.1
Active Connection:     Connexion réseau
Connected:     Yes
Online:          Yes
Using Modem:     No
Using LAN:     Yes
Using Proxy:     No
SSL 3.0 Support:     Enabled
TLS 1.0 Support:     Enabled
Firewall Information
Windows Firewall is off.
ZoneAlarm Firewall is installed.
Connection attempt to Apple web site was successful.
Connection attempt to browsing iTunes Store was successful.
Connection attempt to purchasing from iTunes Store was unsuccessful.
The network connection timed out.
Connection attempt to iPhone activation server was successful.
Connection attempt to firmware update server was successful.
Connection attempt to Gracenote server was successful.
Last successful iTunes Store access was 2011-07-17 18:43:19.
**** Device Connectivity Tests ****
iPodService 10.3.1.55 (x64) is currently running.
iTunesHelper 10.3.1.55 is currently running.
Apple Mobile Device service 3.3.0.0 is currently running.
Universal Serial Bus Controllers:
Contrôleur d'hôte ouvert PCI vers USB NEC. Device is working properly.
Contrôleur hôte PCI vers USB standard étendu. Device is working properly.
Contrôleur hôte universel Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB - 27C8. Device is working properly.
Contrôleur hôte universel Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB - 27C9. Device is working properly.
Contrôleur hôte universel Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB - 27CA. Device is working properly.
Contrôleur hôte universel Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB - 27CB. Device is working properly.
Contrôleur hôte universel Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB - 27CC. Device is working properly.
No FireWire (IEEE 1394) Host Controller found.
Most Recent Devices Not Currently Connected:
iPod touch (2nd generation) running firmware version 4.2.1
Serial Number:     9E01226F201
**** Device Sync Tests ****
No iPod, iPhone, or iPad found.

thats just rubbish ! i bought it secondhand for my daughter to use for music and apps, but its not compatible with anything, any suggestions other then throwing it away?

How do I fix colour picker to work across different colour-managed monitors?

Hey everyone!
I'm assuming this problem I'm having stems from having colour-calibrated monitors, but let me know if I'm wrong!
To preface, this is the setup I have:
Windows 7
3 monitors as follows, all have individual colour profiles calibrated using the Spyder 3
Cintiq 12WX
Dell U2410
Dell 2409WFP
Photoshop CS6 - Proofed with Monitor RGB, and tested with colour-managed and non-colour-managed documents
I usually do most of my work on the Cintiq 12WX, but pull the photoshop window to my main monitor to do large previews and some corrections. I noticed that the colour picker wouldn't pick colours consistently depending on the monitor the Photoshop window is on.
Here are some video examples:
This is how the colour picker works on my Dell U2410: http://screencast.com/t/lVevxk5Ihk
This is how it works on my Cintiq 12WX: http://screencast.com/t/tdREx4Xyhw9
Main Question
I know the Cintiq's video capture makes the picture look more saturated than the Dell's, but it actually looks fine physically, which is okay. But notice how the Cintiq's colour picker doesn't pick a matching colour. It was actually happening the opposite way for a while (Dell was off, Cintiq was fine), but it magically swapped while I was trying to figure out what was going on. Anyone know what's going on, and how I might fix it?
Thanks for *any* help!
Semi-related Question regarding Colour Management
Colour management has always been the elephant-in-the-room for me when I first tried to calibrate my monitors with a Spyder colourimeter years ago. My monitors looked great, but Photoshop's colours became unpredictable and I decided to abandon the idea of calibrating my monitors for years until recently. I decided to give it another chance and follow some tutorials and articles in an attempt to keep my colours consistent across Photoshop and web browsers, at least. I've been proofing against monitor colour and exporting for web without an attached profile to keep pictures looking good on web browsers. However, pictures exported as such will look horrible when uploaded to Facebook. Uploading pictures with an attached colour profile makes it look good on Facebook. This has forced me to export 2 versions of a picture, one with an attached colour profile and one without, each time I want to share it across different platform. Is there no way to fix this issue?
Pictures viewed in Windows Photo Viewer are also off-colour, but I think that's because it's not colour managed... but that's a lesser concern.

I think I've figured out the colour management stuff in the secondary question, but the weird eyedropper issue is still happening. Could just be a quirk from working on things across multiple monitors, but I'm hoping someone might know if this is a bug/artifact.
Going to lay out what I inferred from my experiments regarding colour management in case other noobs like me run into the same frustrations as I did. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong - the following are all based on observation.
General Explanation
A major source of my problems stem from my erroneous assumption that all browsers will use sRGB when rendering images. Apparently, most popular browsers today are colour-managed, and will use an image's embedded colour profile if it exists, and the monitor's colour profile if it doesn't. This was all well and good before I calibrated my monitors, because the profile attached to them by default were either sRGB or a monitor default that's close to it. While you can never guarantee consistency on other people's monitors, you can catch most cases by embedding a colour profile - even if it is sRGB. This forces colour-managed browsers to use sRGB to render your image, while non-colour-managed browsers will simply default to sRGB. sRGB seems to be the profile used by Windows Photo Viewer too, so images saved in other wider gamut colour spaces will look relatively drab when viewed in WPV versus a colour-managed browser.
Another key to figuring all this out was understanding how Profile Assignment and Conversion work, and the somewhat-related soft-proofing feature. Under Edit, you are given the option to either assign a colour profile to the image, or convert the image to another colour profile. Converting an image to a colour profile will replace the colour profile and perform colour compensations so that the image will look as physically close to the original as possible. Assigning a profile only replaces the colour profile but performs no compensations. The latter is simulated when soft-proofing (View > Proof Colors or ctrl/cmd-Y). I had followed bad advice and made the mistake of setting up my proofing to Monitor Color because this made images edited in Photoshop look identical when the same image is viewed in the browser, which was rendering my images with the Monitor's colour profile, which in turn stemmed from yet another bad advice I got against embedding profiles . This should formally answer Lundberg's bewilderment over my mention of soft-proofing against Monitor Colour.
Conclusion and Typical Workflow (aka TL;DR)
To begin, these are the settings I use:
Color Settings: I leave it default at North American General Purpose 2, but probably switch from sRGB to AdobeRGB or ProPhoto RGB so I can play in a wider gamut.
Proof Setup: I don't really care about this anymore because I do not soft-proof (ctrl/cmd-Y) in this new workflow.
Let's assume that I have a bunch of photographs I want to post online. RAWs usually come down in the AdobeRGB colour space - a nice, wide gamut that I'll keep while editing. Once I've made my edits, I save the source PSD to prep for export for web.
To export to web, I first Convert to the sRGB profile by going to Edit > Convert to Profile. I select sRGB as the destination space, and change the Intent to either Perceptual or Relative Colorimetric, depending on what looks best to me. This will convert the image to the sRGB colour space while trying to keep the colours as close to the original as possible, although some shift may occur to compensate for the narrower gamut. Next, go to Save for Web. The settings you'll use:
Embed Color Profile CHECKED
Convert to sRGB UNCHECKED (really doesn't matter since you're already in the sRGB colour space)
and Preview set to Internet Standard RGB (this is of no consequence - but it will give a preview of what the image will look like in the sRGB space)
That's it! While there might be a slight shift in colour when you converted from AdobeRGB to sRGB, everything from then on should stay consistent from Photoshop to the browser
Edit: Of course, if you'd like people to view your photos in glorious wide gamut in their colour-managed browsers, you can skip the conversion to sRGB and keep them in AdobeRGB. When Saving for Web, simply remember to Embed the Color Profile, DO NOT convert to sRGB, and set Preview to "Use Document Profile" to see what the image would look like when drawn with the embedded color profile

Help: Windows cannot restore a system image to a computer with different firmware

I want to recover a complete image of a Windows 7 operating system I have backed up to my other server. But I am getting the error "Windows cannot restore a system image to a computer with different firmware. The System Image was created by a computer using BIOS and this computer is using EFI"
The image was definitely taken from this machine - the firmware has not changed!
What do I need to do to restore the image?
Background Story ..
I bought a new HP 255 laptop per-installed with Windows 7 without Operating Systems instal disks (I will NEVER be stupid enough to do that again!).
I took a complete image of the systems, as suggested so that I was well backed up.
However, my machine corrupted its operating systems with a few weeks. The boot recovery CD did not work (would not boot). So in desperation, and because time was short I went out and bought another, legitimate copy of Windows 7 DVD with a license key (So now I have 2, legitimate copies of the operating system!).
I installed the new copy of Windows 7 - but it was dreadful, because many drivers were missing. Mostly the missing drivers were not available on the HP support site for this machine. ALso, boot up was increadibly slow compared to the original OS installation.
So I created a new boot recovery disk from the new version of Windows, and tried to restore using that. New boot disk loads ok, I can find the old image on my network (after loading a few network drivers). But I won't instal the image - giving the above error message.
I tried deleting the EFI partition from the disk (using GPARTED to reformat that partition). That killed the Windows 7 on the machine - but still gives the same error message when I try to re-image the machine.
I have tried going into the BIOS settings .. HP 255 has a "Legacy Mode" - which I have enabled, but this makes no difference at all!
I think that the kind of solutions I am looking for might be:
1. There is a clever way of disabling EFI on my 255 so that it looks like a legacy BIOS machine, or
2. This EFI this is wired into my new boot recovery disk - and there is a way of creating a boot recovery disk that does not use EFI
This has taken me about 2 weeks so far,please help with any suggestions!

DonOxley wrote:
Erico,
I suspect that "MSDOS" is what the Gparted tool calls "MBR" for a partition table, as explained here:
http://superuser.com/questions/700770/mbr-equals-msdos-for-gparted
I think that you are suggesting I give up on trying to recover the image I have stored on my server and just to instal Windows 7 from my new copy. There are two problems with this.
1. After having systematically downloaded all of the drivers from the HP 255 notebook support page, I am still seeing missing drivers listed. Install the AMD graphics softpaq driver first. It also contains the chipset drivers.
2. The machine is taking a hugely long time to boot up, and seems much slower with this version. Maybe that is a product of using "EFI" rather than "bios" - I don't know.
My assumption is that HP had some special set-up option with their version of Windows which makes the machine more performant. It does not seem to be a coincidence that the image they deliver the machine with is not quite compatible with a 'normal' Windows 7 instal.
So my original question stands: How do I recover the image that I saved away (as per instructed) when I first bough the machine?
You still have not said what you used to create the system image. What is the "image" file's extension?
You are mistaken in your comparison. MSDOS is an operating sytem MBR is a partitioning scheme. that is comparing apples to oranges.
The article is making an oblique reference in that using GPARTED is more or less equated to using the diskpart utility at the command line. Everything done at the comand line is essentially done by use of MSDOS commands. GPARTED does the same thing with LINUX commands via a graphical interface so you don't have to type in the commands in a Linux console.
Do you mean making a backup? a backup is not a clone which can be reproduced on different hardware. The SSD disk replacement does make the hardware differ from the original configuration.
Follow the instaructions on the following tutorial to make your disk a GPT type before installing.
http://www.disk-partition.com/articles/mbr-partition-table-to-gpt.html
****Please click on Accept As Solution if a suggestion solves your problem. It helps others facing the same problem to find a solution easily****
2015 Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience Consumer

N73 with Navicore needs firmware version 2.0628.0....

Hi folks, I have N73 with v0.0.1 firmware but have been told by Navicore that I need 0.0.3 to run their Personal Europe 2006/1 software. Problem is if you go the Nokia site there is no Firmware upgrade for the N73 handset. Anyone got any idea how to get N73 firmware version 2.0628.0.0.3 or later. Thanks in hope

Well, I took my N73 to the Nokia repair centre and the chap checked my actual phone details against Nokia's internal website and guess what - the model of N73 I have only supports the version of firmware that is currently on it (version 2.0628.0.0.1).
He also explianed there are many different versions of the N73 handset and many different levels of firmware for each version. He kindly re-loaded 2.0628.0.0.1 just to make sure that there were no corruptions. The bluetooth still drops out so:
I have now sent the navicore software back to Mobilefun (who have been excellent) and am contemplating what to do with the Nokia N73 - frisby comes to mind.
I wish Nokia would get there act together BEFORE selling phones rather than using us (mushrooms - kept in the dark and fed) to Beta test their code after - and still no comments back from Nokia on this forum.
EDIT: removed expletiveMessage Edited by jams on 26-Sep-2006
02:24 PM

I have a WRT54G Wireless modem with firmware version 1.02...

I have a WRT54G Wireless modem with firmware version 1.02.1 Mar 4 2003. i down loaded the latest firmware for the modem but i can't install it. I get the erroe message"incorrect image file".
What is wrong?

Which version of the WRT54G do you have? If it is not clearly stated on the router, go to Wikipedia.org and search for WRT54G, then you can use your router's serial number to determine which version of the router you own.
The version of the router is important. Each version has a different set of hardware in it, so each version takes a different firmware.
You can only load the firmware that corresponds to your model and version.

Printer sharing across internet sharing

I hope I don't confuse everyone with this.
I have three computers—an iMac running Snow Leopard, an iMac running Lion, and a Mini running Leopard. The SL iMac has a printer plugged into it. The other two computers are across the house from it.
Those two computers are next to each other. The Lion iMac is connected to the Internet via WiFi. The Mini, which does not have wireless, is connected to the Internet via Internet Sharing over an ethernet cable to the Lion iMac.
Now here's the problem. I can print from the Lion iMac through printer sharing across to the SL iMac. However, I can't figure out how to print from the Mini. It won't find the SL iMac's printer. Enabling printer sharing on the Lion iMac lets the Mini see it as a 'printer,' but it won't print across to the SL iMac.
So with this setup, is it possible to print to the SL iMac from the wireless-less Mini?
Just to ward off possible non-workable solutions, rearranging the computers is not feasable right now. It is also not possible to connect the Mini directly to the internet via ethernet. My cable modem is actually in a near-inaccessable part of the house due to that being where the only cable plug is. I have a Time Capsule attached to it, which broadcasts my wireless signal that the WiFi computers can pick up. And no, I can't connect the printer to the Time Capsule—believe me, I tried. I don't want to have to start buying long cables and drilling holes if there's a simpler solution.
Thanks in advance.

If I switch to the discussed set up (Airport Extreme N router), will adding an AX in between at 15 feet help bridge the link between the G5's Airport extreme card and the living room's AX?
Yes. But I still think you should verify if Wi-Fi interference is the cause of your poor signal only 30' away from the AX before going out and purchase anything. Remember, you will tradeoff bandwidth performance for signal strength. With audio, this can be a negative factor.
If you can get a hold of a laptop, I suggest downloading a copy of iStumbler. Use iStumbler's Inspector feature (select Edit > Inspector from iStumbler's menu) to determine the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) at different points around your house, by performing a simple RF site survey. Within the Inspector, note the values for "signal" & "noise" at these locations. Start with the laptop near the AX, note the readings, and then, choose the locations between the AX and, finally, where you have the G5.
SNR is the signal level (in dBm) minus the noise level (in dBm). For example, a signal level of -53dBm measured near an access point and typical noise level of -90dBm yields a SNR of 37dB, a healthy value for wireless LANs.
The SNR, as measured from the laptop, decreases as the range to the base station increases because of applicable free space loss. Also an increase in RF interference from microwave ovens and cordless phones, which increases the noise level, also decreases SNR.
SNR Guideline
o 40dB+ SNR = Excellent signal
o 25dB to 40dB SNR = Very good signal
o 15dB to 25dB SNR = Low signal
o 10dB to 15dB SNR = Very low signal
o 5dB to 10dB SNR = No signal
If the SNR is 20dB+ at each of these locations, then you should be getting reasonable performance from your AirPort. If less, either try to locate the source of the Wi-Fi interference or try relocating the base station or the G5 until they are within a 20dB SNR range.

How do you configure the DAM so it can be shared across multiple CQ instances?

How do you configure the DAM so it can be shared across multiple CQ instances?

You can use shared datastore http://dev.day.com/content/kb/home/Crx/CrxSystemAdministration/HowToCombineTheDatastoreToP reserveDiskSpace.html multiple CQ instance will use same file system to share asset
clustering http://dev.day.com/docs/en/crx/current/administering/cluster.html multiple node will share repository.
But you can not have something like one DAM and then have different CQ instance pointing to it (As not everything goes in to one location in file system)
Yogesh

Need link to WRT16Nv2 Firmware version 11 please.

I recently purchased a WRT160Nv2 router with firmware version 11.
I had it configured to allow remote desktop connection to any of the 3 PCs.
PC1 3389 (External) to 3389 (Internal) on IP aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa
PC2 3390 (External) to 3389 (Internal) on IP bbb.bbb.bbb.bbb
PC3 3391 (External) to 3389 (Internal) on IP ccc.ccc.ccc.ccc
This worked fine.
However, I was having DNS issues that apparently were fixed in firmware version 15, so I upgraded.
And could no longer use the configuration above
As soon as I tried to enter the PC2 details (or PC3) it gave an error saying the port range was already in use.
I'm guessing that the firmware is not recognizing the different IP addresses and thinks the port 3389 is a duplicate.
After much searching, I found a link to firmware versio 8, which supposedly did not have the problems that version 11 has.
However, version 8 has the same issue as version 15 in not allowing the configuration I had.
Ande, after speaking to several online linksys chat people, and waiting patiently for a phone call from a tech, I do not have any link to firmware version 11.
So, if anyone happens to have a WRT160Nv2 with firmware version 11 still on it, and know some way to read the firmware out of it I would really appreciate it
Thanks.

Thanks for the link.
However, when I tried to register it told me my email address was banned (odd, since I've never been to that site).
Also, there is no contact information on the site for contacting the administrators so no way to get email unbanned in order to register to download the firmware.
I'm STILL waiting for the linksys tech to call, was supposed to be 48 hours from when I spoke to the tech online.
ldb.

Photostream sharing across different firmware versions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for