Physical verification for bulk quantities.

Dear pandits,
I am in the process of doing physical inventory thro
MI01, MI04 and MI07.
I have aruond 300-350 items to be done.
Is there a method to simply or a mass maintenance T code for the same.
Kindly help,
thanks in advance
v balajee

Dear pal,
thanks
quote
If you want do an annual inventory, then use transaction MI31 to create physical inventory documeents.
Print them with MI21, enter the count with MI04, post the difference in MI07.
unquote
My understanding is that after MI31, I am still to proceed with MI04 and MI07 .
the process is not ending with MI31, however, the material doc. is getting generated
thanks once again
v balajee

Similar Messages

  • Invoice verification (MM-IV) for bulk materials

    Hi fellow SAP Experts,
    We have a specific requirement for the invoice verification around bulk materials. When ordering bulk material, we almost always receive a larger quantity than ordered. So the quantity on the GR is larger than the quantity on the PO, and this difference can be as high as 10%. If in these cases we receive an invoice with the same quantity as on the GR, and the same unit price as on the PO, we don't want to have an invoice block for quantity (caused by  the 3-way match).
    You could reason to set up an upper limit of 10% for the quantity block DQ in transaction OMR6, but then this limit will be for all invoices. This is undesired, as we want to have tighter limits (e.g. 5%) for other types of products than bulk materials.
    Has any of you guys faced a similar requirement in the past, and how did you approach the solution for it?
    I have already read a lot of documentation on the invoice verification in SAP, but I can't find the solution to my problem in it. So any pointers in the right direction are highly appreciated!
    Best regards, Paul van Rouwendaal

    As far as I understand it now, the DQ block does exactly what you say Mitch: only block if the GR quantity is different than the invoice quantity (without taking the ordered quantity in account). Especially if you use the 'GR Bsd IV'flag on the PO.
    When you don't want to receive more than you have ordered, you can set delivery tollerances in MM on posting the GR, but that is a completely different story. This is actually what we are thinking of using for the cases with bulk material.
    Maybe we still need to extend the check (in enhancement  MM08R002), but for now I think it will not be necessary.
    Thank you all for your helpful replies!

  • Getting physical verification invetory list

    hi all
    will somebody suggest me the best TCODE for taking list of stock (including sale order stock)  for physical verification in warehouse system. presently we are taking list from MC.9. here we take A,B & C class of material for each warehouse.
    Regards
    Prasun Jain

    Hi,
    Try this.
    Step 1A
    MI31
    Step 1B
    MIO1
    Step 2 - MI21
    Step3A - MI04 Step3B - MI05
    Step 4- MI20
    Step 5 MI07
    Also,
    try with special stock "E" in
    i) MI31 - Selected data for physical inventory (here try with special stock "E")
    ii) MI24 - physical inventory list (post inventory account in that)
    Regards,
    Rahul.

  • Physical verification of Assets

    Hi,
    What is the configuration settings required for physical verification of Assets as similar to inventory? Please also detail about the application of this business process in SAP.
    Cheers!

    In the first tab on the asset you have some fields for it. (when these are not hidden.
    There is even a field with last inventory date.
    There is a report with a SAP script that makes it possible to print barcode's for on you asset!
    Dependend on the number of assets you can found the perferct solution.
    When you look on SAP note's there are partners that have software what you can use in combination with Barcodes and SAP.
    An other option is to read the barcode's and upload that file with an LSMW in to the assets (this is the most simple solution that you can implement in some days)

  • Wholesale discounts for bulk buy

    I am currently setting up a online store for a client and this is what she requires: she wants the regular price to be shown and then the wholesale discount for customers that buy in bulk, when there are purchases made of different quantities from
    12   - 120  quantity  ------------- 20% discount
    121 - 240  quantity  ------------- 25% discount
    241 - 300  quantity  ------------- 35% discount
    300+         quantity  ------------- 40% discount
    So how do i do this? do I use the discount module or do I have certain clients that are members to be in a secure zone that can view these discounts or can a have a module that adds the discount when a customer buys for different quantities accordingly….

    you don't need secure zones. ANd you don't need to identify the customer as a wholesaler.
    You'd use the volume discount at a product level. Click enable volume discount, then put your numbers in the Quantity Threshold boxes.

  • I didn't setup a two step verification for my apple Id , and then when i login into my account on the browser it prompt to enter my verification code !!! HOW COME

    i didn't setup a two step verification for my apple Id , and then when i login into my account on the browser it prompt to enter my verification code !!! HOW COME
    please help because all my data are stored in the cloud

    - See if it is listed here for downloading. If it is then redownload it..
    Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store
    - If not there then contact iTunes.
    Contact iTunes

  • How to prevent creation of billing docs for Zero Quantities

    Hello everyone,
    Could someone please help me with this.
    We have some invoices created with 'zero' quantities. We need to stop prining invoices for the invoices with zero quantities. Can we stop creating invoice for zero quantities. if yes , please let me know how. Any help is very much appreciated.
    many thanks
    Edited by: Simsasha on Jan 30, 2009 2:31 AM

    Dear Simsasha,
    Could you please breif whether:
    1. Its Order-related-Billing, OR
    2. Delivery-Related Billing
    If, Its Order-related-Billing, You need to work-around Copy-Control Setting in VTFA; and if,
    Its Delivery Related-Billing, You need to work-around Copy Control settings in VTFL.
    You need to write Code to check Quantity = 0, and attach the same within Field: Data VBRK/VBRP; to check and avoid Invoice creation, if Invoice-item has billed quantity as 0.
    You may work with Program RV60AFZC USEREXIT_FILL_VBRK_VBRP
    Best Regards,
    Amit
    Note: You may take help from the discussion from following thread:
    [Billing with Zero Quantity, not allowed|Re: Billing for zero quantity is being allowed]
    I hope, this would definitely help you, some extent.

  • T-code WV31 create physical inventory for vendor consignment stock

    Hi all,
    I have some issue with T-code WV31i n Sap Retail. Even though it supposed to create physical inventory doc for unrestricted use stock, it also create physical inventory Docs for special stocks (vendor consignment stock). What could be the reason?
    Best regards
    Sameera
    Edited by: Sameera on Dec 23, 2011 7:07 AM

    Hi,
    If i do physical inventory for 2 quantity.
    1. Consignment Payables account debited with 2 qty ( Now stock becomes 4 nos)
    If i issue 4 quantity
    2. Consignment Payables account credited with 4 qty.
    If i do consignment settelment, it is setteling 4-2 (for 2 quantity).
    But I want to settele for 4 quantity.
    Thanks,
    Maruthi

  • Same nr range in Logistics Invoice Verification for the MM and FI document

    I customised Logistics Invoce verification (on ECC6) with the same nr range for MM and FI.  That were done by changing the nr range of doc type RE (in FI) to nr range 52 andcreated the nr range for the company code for fiscal year 2007 and 2008 (our fiscal year 2008 start 1.10.07) and made it external nr assignment.  In MM I changed RD and RS to a new range 05 to which I assigned the nr range 5200000000 to 5299999999 (internally assigned).  For the vendor consignment I created a new document type and assign that to nr range 51 (as the original invoice verification settings).
    This process works quite nice with the same document nr for MM and FI, however I still do have a problem. (I work through the article on above as per FI Expert issue of Sept 07, but even in there my problem was not mentioned.
    If I do an invoice verification for previous period with price changes on the system, Sap want to post 2 accounting docs (1 for the previous month - on which I did have stock and 1 for current month - one which I did not have any stock).  The system only send 1 document nr for FI who needs 2 doc nrs.  I now get the error  message that I must use a document in the nr range 5200000000 and 529999999.
    How do I rectify this or can I not use this functionality if we allow backdating to the previous period
    Regards
    Anna-Marie Robson

    I customised Logistics Invoce verification (on ECC6) with the same nr range for MM and FI.  That were done by changing the nr range of doc type RE (in FI) to nr range 52 andcreated the nr range for the company code for fiscal year 2007 and 2008 (our fiscal year 2008 start 1.10.07) and made it external nr assignment.  In MM I changed RD and RS to a new range 05 to which I assigned the nr range 5200000000 to 5299999999 (internally assigned).  For the vendor consignment I created a new document type and assign that to nr range 51 (as the original invoice verification settings).
    This process works quite nice with the same document nr for MM and FI, however I still do have a problem. (I work through the article on above as per FI Expert issue of Sept 07, but even in there my problem was not mentioned.
    If I do an invoice verification for previous period with price changes on the system, Sap want to post 2 accounting docs (1 for the previous month - on which I did have stock and 1 for current month - one which I did not have any stock).  The system only send 1 document nr for FI who needs 2 doc nrs.  I now get the error  message that I must use a document in the nr range 5200000000 and 529999999.
    How do I rectify this or can I not use this functionality if we allow backdating to the previous period
    Regards
    Anna-Marie Robson

  • Invoice Verification for IMPORT PO(ASSET)

    Hi All,
    User has created Purchase order against Import Material for asset with Account Assignment category as A.While invoice verification for basic customs duty,ECS and HSES, system debiting the GL account for Asset instead of CenVat clearing.
    In case of PO against import material for asset with out account assignment category as A, system debiting the cenvat clearing account accurately.
    Current Accounting Entry
    Commissioner Of Customs Credit
    Asset under construction(CWIP) Debit
    Required Account Entry
    Commissioner Of Customs Credit
    Cenval Clearing - Debit
    Customs deposit a/c - Debit
    It is bit urgent.Please provide the solution.
    Santosh

    Hi,
    Go to SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories > Here for "A", remove "GR Non-Valuated" indicator and then try.
    If it is not working for old PO then create new PO and then try.

  • Can I setup two-step verification for more than one Apple ID?

    I have one iPad and one iPhone.
    I have four Apple IDs.
    I want to setup two-step verification in all four accounts.
    Can I?
    It seems that I can't, because to add a "trusted device" to an Apple ID requires setting up Find My iPhone on that device. Find My iPhone requires an iCloud account (which is available with every Apple ID). But once you change the iCloud account account used for Find My iPhone on a device, the device will not be able to be used in two-step verification for the previous iCloud account. Or will it get remembered?
    Anyone have any knowledge about this?

    You should be able to have more than account authorised on your Mac's iTunes via the Store > Authorise This Computer menu option - and you should be able to select and sync purchases from both accounts to your phones

  • Error message -L3199-Total for assigned quantities exceeds quantity to be removed

    Hi,
    We are facing problem in picking at last HU in WM while creating transfer order for delivery document in PRD. We reproduced same issue in QXS.
    Sales order was created with 40 Drums and also delivery with 40 Drums. Conversion factor mantained in material master is 441 DR = 30000KG, Base unit of measure is KG. While creating TO , we need to insert 5HU(each HU = 8DR) i different line items in TO . Tilll 4th HU is inserted i.e 32 DR(total)  there is no issue. But as soon as we enter 5th HU below error is throwing.
    Error Message - L3199-Total for assigned quantities exceeds quantity to be removed
    In some cases delivery qty is showing more than picked qty (in other deliveries) and hence unable to create or confirm Transfer order.
    Appreciate your comments on above issue /resolution or any OSS note/user exits/BADI exists ?
    Regards,
    Srinivas M

    there is a huge amount of decimal dust
    1 drum has a weight of 68.02721088435374
    calculating the weight of 40 drums (quantity to be removed) in one single calculation rounds different to 5 * 8 drums where you actually have 5 individual calculations with a rounding that is then added to one result (assigned quantity).
    Have a look into this KBA, as it explains different reactions based on the screens that are used.
    However, I think you will not get lucky by this workaround as the you still have inaccurate quantities for the remaining drums
    1926014 - LT03 - Overpicking allowed / not allowed during TO creation in foreground

  • How to use LSMW on CRM for bulk master data creation?

    Hello Experts,
    I need your help to able to use LSMW on CRM for bulk master data creation. Below is described my detailed requirement; -
    We have CRM 2007 integrated with SAP ISU (ECC6.0). As per business process all Business Master Data (BP details, Business Agreement details etc) and Technical Master Data (Connection Object, PoD etc.) is created in CRM and then it is replicated in ISU. We are going to start Assembly Test soon. Now we need to have all master data in place. Tool we want to use is LSMW.
    Now can you help me right from scratch on how to use LSMW for bulk master data creation in CRM?
    Please give me documents / links etc that is relevant.
    Regards,
    Rohit

    Hi,
    I have looked into your query.
    These are some information which might be useful to you.
    What is LSMW?
    Legacy System Migration Workbench or LSMW is SAP standard program that can be used to easily load / change master data or transactions in SAP without any programming at all. It can be used to upload data at cutover, such as: open orders, contracts, materials, vendors, stock on hand. It can also be used in a production system to make changes to existing data. Very limited authorization checks are available on the transaction, so the use of it must be very well controlled.
    One input file can be used to create all the views of the material master. For all the material types. Even if different views and fields are used for the different materials.
    Steps to take
    1. Create text file with data to be loaded
    2. Set up and run LSMW
    The following link will provide good information on LSMW Idoc method:
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ad/2d54a41d7011d2b42e006094b944c8/frameset.htm]
    I hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Venkat

  • Which is better for bulk message scenario in sap xi RFC or Proxy

    which is better for bulk message scenario in ( RFC or Proxy ) ?
    Edited by: prabhatxi on Aug 6, 2010 4:44 PM

    Proxy will alwaays be better option in this case, as it is adapter less framework, and communication happens directly with XI central integration engine. So it is always fast communication and gives good performance.
    But still you should consider other factors, you may consider using RFC as well, as sometime we go for RFC/IDOC as this are the standard interfaces already available rather than creating structure...
    May be you can share more info on what type/volume data are you planning to send via XI?
    Hope this cleart your doubt..
    Divyesh

  • Invoice Verification for Import PO

    Dear Friends,
    We are going live. We are uploading data. For certain Imports, For 10000 Kgs, Import Duties has been paid in february, Out of which, 5000 kgs has been received. For Remaining 5000kgs GRN is pending. So we are creating PO for 5000 Kgs. For these, Invoice verification for custom duties is required for reference during MIGO. So how to create this invoice. What way we have to do this? Please suggest...
    Regards,
    Sridhar

    do MIRO for customs before going for Goods receipt.
    enter PO number no and select  "planned delivery goods" and enter other details and post the document
    go to J1IEX and capture the details ,, go migo and again go to J1IEX and post the document

Maybe you are looking for

  • IMac 27' Mid 2011 Random Shutdowns - Static on start up

    Hello everyone, I will try to explain step by step what's been happening to my computer for the last month: (english not my 1st language so please excuse my grammar) I use my computer mostly for work, I'm a web developer I've never done some kind of

  • File structure and Multi-user access/control

    Hi All Currently evaluating RH. Our plan is to use RH HTML with RoboServer and either SourceSafe or Team Foundation for source control. We will be producing the "printed" manual (PDF) and publishing online help (hopefully html via RH server) from the

  • NIO Selector.select() enters a 100% CPU infinite loop on interruption

    This issue is only reproducible in Windows. When a thread is calling Selector.select() and the other thread interrupts the selector thread, Selector.select() enters an infinite loop taking up CPU time.  All other JDKs I've tried including IBM 1.5 / 1

  • Still no support for multiple users!!

    The only reason I recently updated to 5.0 is I was anxiously awaiting the addition of multi-user support to my Lenovo A10-70 tablet. I had bought it for my young daughter after she broke the screen on her Nexus. Well, without support for User Account

  • System not loading up

    hijelel,