Planning considering the expiry of materials
Dear All ,
We belong to Pharmaceutical industry .We want to carry out material requirement planning for raw materials considering the expiry dates of raw materials .The materials which are due to expire in say next two months should not be considered in planning as unrestricted stock . Kindly suggest the config and master settings for this requirement .
HI
MRP will not check expiry related logics.
it will chekc wether the stock is there or not.
better you need to run the deadline monitoring in back ground that is QA07.
for that your materials should have the batch classification data.
and at the time of GRNs systen will update the expiry dates in the BTCHES.(in material master you need to maintain the shelf life)
So at the time of ruuning the QA07 system will transfer to blocked stock ( all the materials which are expired).
-ashok
Similar Messages
-
Will a explain plan consider a function in a select statement.
Hi gurus,
I have a question regarding explain plan.
I ran a query, which returns me explain plan with multiple CPU costs around 300K.
now i use a function, and the number of lines displayed in explain plan reduces from 12 to 8 lines.
What i dont understand is.. Is the explain plan considering the function in the select statement ?
ex.
explain plan for
select column1,
column2,
function(value1)
from case
where case_no = 1will a explain plan consider the functions in a select statement ?
Thank you.What i dont understand is.. Is the explain plan considering the function in the select statement ?Maybe there are tweaks which reveal more information from the explain plan, but a straightforward way won't necessarily expose any function call:
SQL> create or replace function get_dname (i_deptno integer)
return varchar2
as
l_dname dept.dname%type;
begin
select dname
into l_dname
from dept
where deptno = i_deptno;
return l_dname;
end get_dname;
Function created.
SQL> explain plan
for
select ename, deptno, get_dname (deptno) dname
from emp
where deptno = 10
Explain complete.
SQL> select * from table (dbms_xplan.display ())
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3956160932
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5 | 45 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 5 | 45 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - filter("DEPTNO"=10)
13 rows selected.
SQL> truncate table plan_table
Table truncated.
SQL> explain plan
for
select ename, deptno
from emp
where deptno = 10
Explain complete.
SQL> select * from table (dbms_xplan.display ())
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3956160932
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5 | 45 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 5 | 45 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - filter("DEPTNO"=10)
13 rows selected. -
How to consider the Purchase Orders in Long Term Planning
Hi All,
I wanted to include the Purchase Orders of Finished Material in Long Term Planning.
I have selected the check box "Long-term planning: include firmed issues and receipts" in the Planning Scenario but after LTP run system is not considering the Purchase Orders of Finished Materials for Planning.
Regards,
Shailendra
Edited by: Shailendra Hadkar on Apr 5, 2010 12:41 PMDear,
Could you please explain usage of purchase orders for Finished product?
Regards,
SAP CONS -
i have been using my mac book pro for more than 11 months.
.My use is pretty safe as i use it only at my home and do not carry it to office...
my confusion is that shall i consider the APPLECARE PLAN....the plan is almost 20% of the laptops cost....Will spending so much money be worth itLike any other insurance, it's only worth it if you have a problem. I've purchased it on my "high risk" Macs and not purchased on the others. So far I've never needed it.
-
Consider the pending PO and Purchase requisition fore cast base planning (vv)
Dear friends,
Our client at presently they are using Forecast based planning for RAW material , in that requirement will not consider Pending Pur req and PO, Is that any option for consider pending PO for Forecast based planning , kindly do the needful.
Regards,
Sabhapathy RHello Sabhapathy,
I am not sure why you would need to consider pending PurReqs and POs. These pending documents are considered during the MRP run, but not to generate the forecast.
Forecast-based planning is based on material consumption.
The MRP will generate PurReq or Planner Orders considering the open documents. For example:
+ Current stock = 1000 CS
+ Open PRs and POs to arrive = 400 CS
- Forecast Requirement =1500 CS
- Safety Stock policies = 100 CS (safety stok)
- New replenishment orders = 200 CS
Thanks and Regards,
Mariano -
Can system consider the unrestricted stock when planned with MD50???
Hi,
We have scinerio where FERT with Strategy 20 (MTO Process) is planned with MD50 against the sale oder. Every time Dependent items stock needs to be posted with Movement type 412E against that sale order or else dependent items stock though available in unrestricted is shown as unable against that sale order no. Enitre cost of the FERT material is accounted against sale order number.
Can we avoid posting of sales order stock?? can we make system to consider the unrestricted stock when planned with MD50.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Johnif u want to consume the unrestricted stock, why u implemented MTO??
what was the requirement to implement MTO, when u r asking such question in support............
check first requirement of the client.......if u think they need to consume unresc stock...i will say...implentation was very poor,
regards,
Pravin M -
The system is not considering the free stock in planning strategy grp - 25
Dear Frndz,
The system is not considering the free stock of child items available in the system.For the parent item, I have maintained a planning srategy of 25 (Make to order variant config).My client would like the system to consider the free stock available for child items.pls help me...
Regards,
SriniDear,
Strategy 25 will not consider the existing stock.
What you enter in MRP4 view ind/collective rquirement is applicable only for dependent requirement.
Also refer this thread?
Re: Strategy group 20
Run MRP in MD50 and then MD02 with palnning mode 3 deleted and recreated and check your result.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
Assignments of materials and vendors to inspection plans for the plant 1500
Hi to all,
Please give me solution for make assignments of materials and vendors to inspection plans for the plant 1500.
Thanks,
NAgeshhi gang,
try to make usage decision ,kindly check in material document which you have created while making the GR, check in which storgare location you have specified and try to transfer the stock from quality to unrestricted.and also make a note on batch number also if you have activated the batch management
regards
thyagarajan -
CM38 considering orders of operative planning on the simulative scenu00E1rio
Dear friends,
I'm trying to use the T-code CM38 to analise the capacity load of one LTP planning, but this transaction is taking into account some production orders of the operative planning.
I already checked in T-code MS32 to be sure that my planning scenario is not considering the "receipts", and all those options is not flagged.
I'm using the profile SAPPLAN01 or YBLTP01 to analise the capacity on CM38.
How can I see only the capacity load of simulation orders (my LTP scenario orders) in this transaction? Is it possible?Hello,
Your question should go to ERP Manufacturing (PP) forum [SAP ERP Manufacturing - Production Planning (SAP PP);
This forum is for SAP Manufacturing Execution.
Thanks -
CM38 considering orders of operative planning on the simulative scenario
Dear friends,
I'm trying to use the T-code CM38 to analise the capacity load of one LTP planning, but this transaction is taking into account some production orders of the operative planning.
I already checked in T-code MS32 to be sure that my planning scenario is not considering the "receipts", and all those options is not flagged.
I'm using the profile SAPPLAN01 or YBLTP01 to analise the capacity on CM38.
How can I see only the capacity load of simulation orders (my LTP scenario orders) in this transaction? Is it possible?
Thanks in advance,
RodrigoDear Rodrigo,
In CM38,under detailed settings check whether this planning scenario is mentioned before entering into the capacity details.
Also refer this thread,
Re: Capacity planning
Check and revert
Regards
S Mangalraj -
CBO generating different plans for the same data in similar Environments
Hi All
I have been trying to compare an SQL from 2 different but similar environments build of the same hardware specs .The issue I am facing is environment A, the query executes in less than 2 minutes with plan mostly showing full table scans and hash join whereas in environment B(problematic), it times out after 2 hours with an error of unable to extend table space . The statistics are up to date in both environments for both tables and indexes . System parameters are exactly similar(default oracle for except for multiblock_read_count ).
Both Environment have same db parameter for db_file_multiblock_read_count(16), optimizer(refer below),hash_area_size (131072),pga_aggregate_target(1G),db_block_size(8192) etc . SREADTIM, MREADTIM, CPUSPEED, MBRC are all null in aux_stats in both environment because workload was never collected i believe.
Attached is details about the SQL with table stats, SQL and index stats my main concern is CBO generating different plans for the similar data and statistics and same hardware and software specs. Is there any thing else I should consider .I generally see environment B being very slow and always plans tend to nested loops and index scan whereas what we really need is a sensible FTS in many cases. One of the very surprising thing is METER_CONFIG_HEADER below which has just 80 blocks of data is being asked for index scan.
show parameter optimizer
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
**Environment**
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Note: : There are slight difference in the no of records in the attached sheet.However, I wanted to tell that i have tested with exact same data and was getting similar results but I couldn't retain the data untill collecting the details in the attachment
TEST1 COMPARE TABLE LEVE STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS BLOCKS LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET 3607425 167760 5/02/2013 22:11
METER_CONFIG_HEADER 3658 80 5/01/2013 0:07
METER_CONFIG_ITEM 32310 496 5/01/2013 0:07
NMI 1899024 33557 18/02/2013 10:55
REGISTER 4830153 101504 18/02/2013 9:57
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET 1607456 19137 18/02/2013 15:48
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER 5110781 78691 18/02/2013 9:56
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT 1425890 42468 18/02/2013 13:54
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS BLOCKS LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET 4133939 198570 16/02/2013 10:02
METER_CONFIG_HEADER 3779 80 16/02/2013 10:55
METER_CONFIG_ITEM 33720 510 16/02/2013 10:55
NMI 1969000 33113 16/02/2013 10:58
REGISTER 5837874 120104 16/02/2013 11:05
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET 1788152 22325 16/02/2013 11:06
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER 6101934 91088 16/02/2013 11:07
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT 1447589 43804 16/02/2013 11:11
TEST ITEM 2 COMPARE INDEX STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME UNIQUENESS BLEVEL LEAF_BLOCKS DISTINCT_KEYS AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY CLUSTERING_FACTOR NUM_ROWS
ASSET IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK NONUNIQUE 2 9878 67 147 12982 869801 3553095
ASSET IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 7291 2747 2 639 1755977 3597916
ASSET SYS_C00102592 UNIQUE 2 12488 3733831 1 1 3726639 3733831
METER_CONFIG_HEADER SYS_C0092052 UNIQUE 1 12 3670 1 1 3590 3670
METER_CONFIG_ITEM SYS_C0092074 UNIQUE 1 104 32310 1 1 32132 32310
NMI IDX_NMI_ID NONUNIQUE 2 6298 844853 1 2 1964769 1965029
NMI IDX_NMI_ID_NK NONUNIQUE 2 6701 1923072 1 1 1922831 1923084
NMI IDX_NMI_STATS NONUNIQUE 1 106 4 26 52 211 211
REGISTER REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM NONUNIQUE 2 12498 795 15 2899 2304831 4711808
REGISTER SYS_C00102653 UNIQUE 2 16942 5065660 1 1 5056855 5065660
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3667 1607968 1 1 1607689 1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SDP_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3811 668727 1 2 1606204 1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET SYS_C00102665 UNIQUE 2 5116 1529606 1 1 1528136 1529606
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER SYS_C00102677 UNIQUE 2 17370 5193638 1 1 5193623 5193638
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4406 676523 1 2 1423247 1425890
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 7374 676523 1 2 1458238 1461108
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT SYS_C00102687 UNIQUE 2 4737 1416207 1 1 1415022 1416207
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME UNIQUENESS BLEVEL LEAF_BLOCKS DISTINCT_KEYS AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY CLUSTERING_FACTOR NUM_ROWS
ASSET IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK NONUNIQUE 2 8606 121 71 16428 1987833 4162257
ASSET IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 8432 1780146 1 1 2048170 4162257
ASSET SYS_C00116157 UNIQUE 2 13597 4162263 1 1 4158759 4162263
METER_CONFIG_HEADER SYS_C00116570 UNIQUE 1 12 3779 1 1 3734 3779
METER_CONFIG_ITEM SYS_C00116592 UNIQUE 1 107 33720 1 1 33459 33720
NMI IDX_NMI_ID NONUNIQUE 2 6319 683370 1 2 1970460 1971313
NMI IDX_NMI_ID_NK NONUNIQUE 2 6597 1971293 1 1 1970771 1971313
NMI IDX_NMI_STATS NONUNIQUE 1 98 48 2 4 196 196
REGISTER REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM NONUNIQUE 2 15615 1273 12 2109 2685924 5886582
REGISTER SYS_C00116748 UNIQUE 2 19533 5886582 1 1 5845565 5886582
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4111 1795084 1 1 1758441 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SDP_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4003 674249 1 2 1787987 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET SYS_C004520 UNIQUE 2 5864 1795130 1 1 1782147 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER SYS_C004539 UNIQUE 2 20413 6152850 1 1 6073059 6152850
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3227 660649 1 2 1422572 1447803
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 6399 646257 1 2 1346948 1349993
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT SYS_C00128706 UNIQUE 2 4643 1447946 1 1 1442796 1447946
TEST ITEM 3 COMPARE PLANS
ENVIRONMENT A
Plan hash value: 4109575732
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 6 | 900 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:04 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN ANTI | | 1 | 137 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:03 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| NMI | 1 | 22 | | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 131 | | 95137 (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 109 | | 95132 (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ASSET | 36074 | 1021K| | 38553 (2)| 00:07:43 |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN | | 90361 | 7059K| 4040K| 56578 (2)| 00:11:19 |
|* 10 | HASH JOIN | | 52977 | 3414K| 2248K| 50654 (2)| 00:10:08 |
|* 11 | HASH JOIN | | 39674 | 1782K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 39439 | 1232K| | 22584 (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 4206K| 56M| | 17490 (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT | 675K| 12M| | 9412 (2)| 00:01:53 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET | 1178K| 15M| | 4262 (2)| 00:00:52 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_NMI_ID_NK | 2 | | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 17 | VIEW | | 39674 | 232K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 18 | HASH JOIN | | 39674 | 1046K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 19 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 39439 | 500K| | 22584 (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 4206K| 56M| | 17490 (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_HEADER | 3658 | 47554 | | 19 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 22 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_ITEM | 7590 | 68310 | | 112 (2)| 00:00:02 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
3 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
4 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
7 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD" AND "SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
8 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
9 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
10 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
11 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
12 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
13 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
18 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
19 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
20 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
22 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
ENVIRONMENT B
Plan hash value: 2826260434
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN ANTI | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 176 | 56855 (2)| 00:11:23 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 163 | 36577 (2)| 00:07:19 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ASSET | 1 | 44 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 131 | 9834 (2)| 00:01:59 |
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 87 | 9830 (2)| 00:01:58 |
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 74 | 9825 (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 52 | 9820 (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| METER_CONFIG_HEADER | 1 | 14 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 33 | 116 (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_ITEM | 1 | 19 | 115 (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 13 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C00116570 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT | 723K| 13M| 9699 (2)| 00:01:57 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | NMI | 1 | 22 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_NMI_ID_NK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET | 1 | 13 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_SLA_SDP_SK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 76113 | 2378K| 26743 (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 5095K| 63M| 20245 (2)| 00:04:03 |
| 22 | VIEW | | 90889 | 443K| 47021 (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 23 | HASH JOIN | | 90889 | 2307K| 47021 (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 24 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 76113 | 966K| 26743 (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 25 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 5095K| 63M| 20245 (2)| 00:04:03 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
3 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK" AND
"SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
4 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD")
5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
9 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
10 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
12 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
13 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
17 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
18 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
19 - access("SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
20 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
23 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
24 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
25 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:16 PM
Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:18 PMHi Paul,
I misread your question initially .The system stats are outdated in both ( same result as seen from aux_stats) .I am not a DBA and do not have access to gather system stats fresh.
select * from sys.aux_stats$
SNAME PNAME PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO STATUS NULL COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTART NULL 02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTOP NULL 02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO FLAGS 1 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEEDNW 1321.20523 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOSEEKTIM 10 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOTFRSPEED 4096 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN SREADTIM NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MREADTIM NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEED NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MBRC NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MAXTHR NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN SLAVETHR NULL NULL -
How do the Procurement of materials from projects?
Hi Friends'
How do the Procurement of materials from project s, here our Process is:
Whenever our engineers on site see any shortages he will send a report thro our customized InfoPath request form. Then we decide depending on the material whether to order to USA or Procure locally. Some mechanical parts we procure locally. For this in PR we give reference of WBS element. Purchase department raise PO, we receive material, sent to site And finally we charge USA(parent Company) for this amount against this project.
For the items like electronic cards, Critical mechanical parts to be ordered to USA we send the InfoPath form to USA. We get weekly shipments from USA. We create PR and also PO. No action by our purchase dept. The FREE OF CHARGE (FOC) material is received to us. Stores will do MIGO and then we dispatch to Site.
Friends please suggest how to do this Process through project systems. I need the entire configuration setting that we need to do and the process also, plz friends... I need these settings step by step.
Regards,
Hari
Edited by: Hari Krishna on Jan 3, 2009 12:39 PMsuggest attend course PLM220
If using only WBS then you have to raise PR from MM module and the material demand will not be driven from PS (except Easy Cost Planning)
If using networks then assign material component to network activity and set the item category as non stock item - this will trigger PR from activity -
FI-AP Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT
Sub: A/P Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT
Hi Frnds.
I have a typical problem.
Till now we are using a "W6" as a tax code, where Excise-10%, Ed Cess-2%, SEd Cess-1% and VAT-4%.
But as the Govt. rules changed I have created a new tax code "W8" by copying the W6 and modified the VAT to 5% by changing the condition record JVRD.
The new tax code is not calculating VAT part correctly. It is taxing into consideration Invoice Base value, Ed Cess & SEd Cess (Omiting the Excise Duty).
I have checked my Tax Procedure, there everything is fine. Even my old tax code "W6" is working correctly.
Let me know where the error lies.
Here is the scenario
00. Tax code - W6 - W8 - Current Staus of W8
01. Invoice Base - 355181 - 351798 - 353324 (by SAP Document Simulation View)
02. Excise @ 10% on 01. - 35518 - 35180 - 35332
03. Ed Cess @ 2% on 01. - 710 - 704 - 707
04. SEd Cess @ 1% on 01. - 355 - 352 - 353
05. VAT @ 4% on (010203+04) - 15671 - 0 - 0
05. VAT @ 5% on (010203+04) - 0 - 19401 - 0
05. VAT @ 5% on (010304) - 0 - 0 - 17719
INVOICE TOTAL VALUE - 407435 - 407435 - 407435
Pls. let me know how to come over the issue.
By the way I am using the above tax code at FB60 transaction code.
Regards
Krishna
Edited by: Gopi Krishna Gutti on Oct 17, 2011 10:18 AMHi Vivek
Acutually we planned to implement SAP - FI & MM Modules only, and all the configuration is done in the system, but at the final stage our management is not satisfied with MM area, so finally we have gone live with only FI Moudle.
By the way thankyou for the reply. I have maintained 100% in JMX1 for the new tax code and it is working fine.
I will give you full points.
Once again thanks a lot.
Regards
Krishna -
The necessary shipping materials and the means of transport
The answer of the question below is "d. Shipping point". On the other hand, shipping type (shipment type determines how the goods will be transported - tuck, train, ship etc....) is entered in the "shipment type" at the customization.
Taking into consideration this fact, why is the answer of this question is given as "shipping point"?
What part of the company is responsible for the type of shipping, the necessary shipping materials and the means of transport?
Only one answer is correct.
a. Sales Organization
b. Transportation planning point
c. Shipping condition
d. Shipping point
e. Warehousehi
As per my knowledge, normally goods are transported from Plant through shipping point, So ultimately shipping point is the responsible for that. -
MTO Strategy consider the stock in hand
Dear Experts,
AM new in MRP Field, pls advise me about pure MTO Strategy which consider stock in hand. MRP run should consider the available stock for net requirement calculation. I tried with strategy 20,but it is not consider the stock.Pls advise,
Regards,
VijeshVijesh,
MTO by definition will only consider Sales order stock. This is the main planning difference between MTO and MTS. Thus, if you have generic stock on hand (not sales order specific) it is supposed to be excluded from MRP planning.
If you wish for MTO planning to consider generic stock, you have to first convert the stock to Sales Order specific stock (Special stock type 'E') using a Material Movement transaction. Or, you can stop using MTO and use an MTS strategy, such as 40.
For more info about MTO planning see http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_06/helpdata/EN/f4/7d2ed844af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Best Regards,
DB49
Maybe you are looking for
-
Problem to Create Swing Form in Jdeveloper 12
Hi, I'm trying to create a JFrame in Swing but tells me the following error. Called DataObject.find on null
-
Installed Leopard on drive, but did not wipe it clean
I installed Leopard on a partitioned drive and didn't erase everything on it. I thought I did, but apparently not. Whenever I restarted with the install disk in the machine, it started up in Leopard, all nice and new. Then when I restated with the di
-
Editing a Table entry while debugging
Dear All how can I edit a table entry in SE11 during debugging mode ? Regards, Alok.
-
Do Not Enter Sign on Macbook Pro. 2010 13 inch
Hey Guys, 1.5 years into the life of my MBP and somethings gone wrong. Was getting the Mac out of sleep and it froze so I hard rebooted it, and it went to normal start up and then the Do Not Enter Sign came up and after googling it, tried everything.
-
Business Catalyst Help | Create page redirects
This question was posted in response to the following article: http://helpx.adobe.com/business-catalyst/partner/redirect-page-urls.html