FI-AP Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT

Sub: A/P Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT
Hi Frnds.
I have a typical problem.
Till now we are using a "W6" as a tax code, where Excise-10%, Ed Cess-2%, SEd Cess-1% and VAT-4%.
But as the Govt. rules changed I have created a new tax code "W8" by copying the W6 and modified the VAT to 5% by changing the condition record JVRD.
The new tax code is not calculating VAT part correctly. It is taxing into consideration Invoice Base value, Ed Cess & SEd Cess (Omiting the Excise Duty).
I have checked my Tax Procedure, there everything is fine. Even my old tax code "W6" is working correctly.
Let me know where the error lies.
Here is the scenario
00. Tax code                       -   W6   -   W8   - Current Staus of W8
01. Invoice Base               - 355181 - 351798 - 353324 (by SAP Document Simulation View)
02. Excise @ 10% on 01.        -  35518 -  35180 -  35332
03. Ed Cess @ 2% on 01.        -    710 -    704 -    707
04. SEd Cess @ 1% on 01.       -    355 -    352 -    353
05. VAT @ 4% on (010203+04)  -  15671 -   0     -  0
05.    VAT @ 5% on (010203+04)  -    0    -  19401 -  0
05.     VAT @ 5% on (010304)     -   0     -    0    -  17719
INVOICE TOTAL VALUE            - 407435 - 407435 - 407435
Pls. let me know how to come over the issue.
By the way I am using the above tax code at FB60 transaction code.
Regards
Krishna
Edited by: Gopi Krishna Gutti on Oct 17, 2011 10:18 AM

Hi Vivek
Acutually we planned to implement SAP - FI & MM Modules only, and all the configuration is done in the system, but at the final stage our management is not satisfied with MM area, so finally we have gone live with only FI Moudle.
By the way thankyou for the reply. I have maintained 100% in JMX1 for the new tax code and it is working fine.
I will give you full points.
Once again thanks a lot.
Regards
Krishna

Similar Messages

  • Tax codes not flowing into the PO

    Hi
    We are using EBP 4.0.
    We are using the classic scenario. In the EBP system we have defined the tax codes and done the mapping to the tax codes in the backend system.
    We are creating a shopping cart and entering a tax code.The tax value gets calculated and is displayed in the SC.This goes for approval and creates a PR in the backend system.The PR is converted to PO.Here the PO gets saved without tax code. Even for Invoice the tax values dont show.
    Can you let me know what is to be done.

    Hello,
    As far I know, there is no tax for a PR.
    You could transfer the tax defined in the SC only when you create directly a PO.
    Rgds,
    Pierre

  • Tax Code not copied from Billing to Accounting

    Hi,
    I have a case wherein the tax code is not being copied over from an intercompany Invoice to Accounting line items.
    The conditon record at Billing Header (MWST) has a tax code of B4. The Tax code at the Accouting Line Items is coming out as Blank. The VAT number however is correctly defined.
    What we did notice is that this would occur when the MWST is determined as 0%. For non-zero data, the tax code gets copied over.
    Does anyone have any idea why its happening this way.
    Thanks n Regards
    Dharmendra Rara

    Hi Dharmendra,
    Please note that the SD-FI interface changed
    from earlier releases. The note 400766 eplxains the checks made.
    So it is possible that now you get error message FF805, when in an
    earlier release you didn't get it, eventhough no customizing change.
    However please note =>
    In the vast majority of cases, error FF805 occurs because of an error
    in your pricing procedure. The previously attached note 112609 explains
    in detail how tax codes are transfered to conditions.
    The note 400766 explains the checks performed by the system on the Tax
    codes:
    1. system checks whether there is a revenue line for each tax line.
    2. in the reverse case, for each revenue line containing a certain
       tax indicator there must be a tax line with this indicator.
    If the tax condition has condition value zero and condition base
    value zero, then it is not transferred to FI.
    If you have revenue lines containing a tax indicator XX, but no
    tax line with tax indicator XX, then the error FF805 issues, and
    it is justified. => Please check these informations.
    I hope this is helpful.
    Regards,
    Alex

  • Validation for tax code not to use

    Dear Gurus,
    i had done validation for purchase/sales tax code not use while doing transction.
    Prerequisite
    BKPF-BUKRS =1000
    CHECK
    NOT BESEG-MESKZ IN ZTAXCODE
    Message
    you can't use this tax code
    i had done this validation for parent company code(1000) but it is giving error for our subsidiary company(3000), though the tax procedure is differnet for both the company taxinj(india) and taxusj(usa). Also the end user is making transction in company code 3000 without tax code still system give him error.
    Please advice how to rectify it.
    Regards,
    Rajesh K

    Hi,
    As per my understanding the Tax Code is same but the Tax Procedures are different for the two Company Codes. The solution is to add Company Code 3000 also in the validation Prerequisite. With this it could work.
    Regards,
    Kiron Kumar T.

  • Tax code not getting picked up from PO during SES

    Dear Experts,
    I am looking for configuration where the end user need not enter Tax code during SES. I tried a scenario where I did not maintain any service master and also did not enter any line item in service tab at item level, rather I processed my PO using limits.
    Now when I prepare SES using this PO, Tax code is not getting picked up from PO and some tax code(I1) appears. Since I don't want end user to input any tax code I've left it blank.
    Finally when I am doing MIRO, i am not able select the desired Tax code(say I8) as it is not available for selection. I get only one Tax code(say I1) available for selection. Even other Tax codes are not available for selection.
    Please advise, how do I resolve this, why is the Tax code not getting picked up in SES? and why am I not getting other tax codes for selection in MIRO?
    Thanks and Regards
    Mansih

    Hi,
    Tax for service maintained in the service PO in the INVOICE TAB in item details. You are not going to maintain the service tax during SES. In SES you are just recognizing / confirming the vendor performed /completed the required service given to him.
    During invoice tax code will flow from service PO to Invoice & you need to just select check box u201Ccalculate taxu201D & remove default tax code in MIRO, if any tax code set for default entry in MIRO. If you want your service tax code should appear in the MIRO screen then just activate in t.code:OBZT (relevant for all transaction),then  you can select your service tax code during invoice verification WRT service PO.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Enter an input tax code, not an output tax code in Txn CNMM

    Hi All,
    We are trying to use PROMAN transaction CNMM from Project systems for converting PR to PO. But when I try to do that I get the following error
    "Enter an input tax code, not an output tax code"
    So it seems that the system is picking the incorrect sales tax code in PO because of which the PR is not converted to PO then. But when I check in transaction CNMM there is no place to input a tax code anywhere. So the system is probably picking it from somewhere, but I am not able to figure out where is it picking it from.
    Does someone have an idea about where the system is picking the tax code?
    Regards,
    V S

    Hi,
    Can you do one thing in your testing server....
    Create purchase requisition manually for that material and with respect to that requisition try to create PO without putting any tax code, and see whether you are able to create PO, keep the same document types at PR and PO level, (it should be the same when you create PO thru CNMM)
    -Saleel

  • Do not consider the stock onhand during SNP.

    Hi APO specialists.
    I'd like to run SNP plan that do not consider the stock onhand.
    Material A is purchase item. and the forecast of material A has 400 qty.
    and stock onhand is 200 qty.
    But I want to make the purchase request as 400 qty.
    How to ?
    Anyone who has the solution can reply this question.
    Thank you all.

    Hi,
    Try following in separate planning book by copying standard planning book.
    In a macro for stock balance change the step for calculation of stock on hand projected. In this step remove the function of INITIAL_STOCK.
    Regards,
    Vaibhav
    Edited by: Vaibhav Birwadkar on May 26, 2008 7:20 AM

  • The system is not considering the free stock in planning strategy grp - 25

    Dear Frndz,
    The system is not considering the free stock of child items available in the system.For the parent item, I have maintained a planning srategy of 25 (Make to order variant config).My client would like the system to consider the free stock available for child items.pls help me...
    Regards,
    Srini

    Dear,
    Strategy 25 will not consider the existing stock.
    What you enter in MRP4 view ind/collective rquirement is applicable only for dependent requirement.
    Also refer this thread?
    Re: Strategy group 20
    Run MRP in MD50 and then MD02 with palnning mode 3 deleted and recreated and check your result.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • No tax code available in the PO

    Dear Experts
    I am converting a Purchase Requisition into Purchase Order. There is no tax code available in the PO.
    How ist the standard procedure generally. Pls. can you explain me the common way to determine the tax code by the system.
    I'm lost here so any help is highly appreciated and greatly rewarded
    Regards
    Marco

    Hi,
       Try this option to default Tax code in PO,
    Follow these steps for population of tax code in PO:
    1. In IMG go to Purchasing => Taxes => Set Tax Indicator for Material and copy standard configuration and rename it to appropriate country code
    2. In IMG go to Purchasing => Conditions => Configure Condition Index => Change Condition Types. Select NAVS condition and go for details option. Select Access Sequence as 0003 (Tax Classification) and select Records for access option. Select appropriate option for the country in Tax indicator for Material field and Select Validity date and Save.
    3. Next, use transaction MEK1 to go to condition table for assigning Key Combination. Select NAVS condition type and select Key combination. Select option u201CTaxes: Material, Plant and Originu201D and enter. Enter values in required fields.
    4. Next validate the configuration by creating Material Master Record and a PO u2013 Select configured indicator in Purchasing view of Material Master Record (Tax indicator for Material field). Create a PO for validation.
    Thanks
    Rajesh

  • Pull the tax code automatically in the column field ??

    Could you please guide me how to pull the tax code automatically in the column field in the Sale Order form? I don't refer to the tax determination.

    Hi,
    In the Demo database, please create a new Business Partner and assign a tax code under the Business Partner Master Data > Accounting tab > tax tab. Make sure that the Business Partner is tax liable.
    Then try to create a SO for that BP Code and see whether the tax code is populated in the tax code field.
    Also, check that the Item taken into the SO is tax liable and under the Sales Tab what tax code is selected.
    Please update the results from the testing.
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team
    Edited by: Jitin Chawla on Aug 11, 2011 5:55 PM

  • Difference between 2 timestamp,not considering the weekends (SATURDAY,SUN)

    I use an Oracle XE and I have a table which has the following Timestamp columns
    A_Date Timestamp
    R_Date Timestamp
    Now in this query i need to be able to exclude the SAT/SUN and show the difference between these 2 timestamp dates.
    Could any one help on this?
    I use this query to find out the difference between the 2 dates (R_DATE - A_DATE),showing the DAYS:HOURS:MIN:SECS
    TRUNC (TO_NUMBER (SUBSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE),
    1,
    INSTR (R_DATE - A_DATE, ' ')
    || ':'
    || SUBSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE),
    INSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE), ' ') + 1,
    2
    || ':'
    || SUBSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE),
    INSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE), ' ') + 4,
    2
    || ':'
    || SUBSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE),
    INSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE), ' ') + 7,
    2
    ) "TTR"
    Example : A_DATE := '11-Dec-2009 19:33:30 PM' ---> Friday
    R_DATE := '14-Dec-2009 07:32:38 AM' ---> Monday
    should not consider the SAT/SUN that comes between them.
    Thanks
    GAG

    SQL> create table t as (
      2  select to_timestamp('11-dec-2009 07:33:30 PM') rdate
      3  ,      to_timestamp('14-dec-2009 07:32:38 AM') adate
      4  from   dual
      5  );
    Table created.
    SQL> select rdate
      2  ,      adate
      3         /* do some final formatting */
      4  ,      to_number(substr(diff_incl_weekend, 1, instr( diff_incl_weekend, chr(32))))
      5         ||':'||
      6         substr(diff_incl_weekend, instr( diff_incl_weekend, chr(32))+1, 8) diff_incl_weekend
      7  ,      to_number(substr(diff_excl_weekend, 1, instr( diff_excl_weekend, chr(32))))
      8         ||':'||
      9         substr(diff_incl_weekend, instr( diff_excl_weekend, chr(32))+1, 8) diff_excl_weekend    
    10  from ( /* substract intervals */
    11         select to_char(rdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM') rdate
    12         ,      to_char(adate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM') adate
    13         ,      trim('+'
    14                from
    15                numtodsinterval((to_date(to_char(adate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM')
    16                                 -
    17                                 to_date(to_char(rdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM')
    18                                )
    19                               , 'day')
    20                    ) diff_incl_weekend
    21         ,      trim('+'
    22                from            
    23                numtodsinterval((to_date(to_char(adate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM')
    24                                 -
    25                                 to_date(to_char(rdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM')
    26                                 -
    27                                 nof_satsuns.total
    28                                )
    29                               , 'day')
    30                    ) diff_excl_weekend
    31         from   t
    32         ,      /* calculate nof sats and suns*/
    33              ( select count(dy) total
    34                from ( select to_char(rdate+level-1, 'dy') dy
    35                       from   t
    36                       where  to_char(rdate+level-1, 'dy', 'nls_date_language=american') in ('sat','sun')
    37                       connect by level <= trunc(to_date(to_char(adate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'))
    38                                           -
    39                                           trunc(to_date(to_char(rdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'))+1
    40                     )    
    41              ) nof_satsuns
    42      );
    RDATE                   ADATE                   DIFF_INCL_WEEKEND                                 DIFF_EXCL_WEEKEND
    11-dec-2009 07:33:30 PM 14-dec-2009 07:32:38 AM 2:11:59:08                                        0:11:59:08

  • Rebate settlements should not hit the VAT account

    Hello everyone,
    There is a question on Rebate Settlement.
    There is a customer who is entitled to a 15% BPR rebate.
    We are accruing for this rebate successfully
    The issue we are having is that the materials that this customer buy from us attract 20% VAT but when the customer claims back from us they do not claim the VAT component.
    We need to  be able to do rebate settlements that do not hit the VAT account.
    I ran a test in SAP on a sample rebate agreement but the only way I could get the rebate settlement to not hit a VAT account was to change a material to be not liable for tax and then settle against that material.
    Billing doc 1-Posts to VAT since the material is Tax inclusive
    Billing doc 2-Does not posts to VAT since the material is Tax exclusive
    Any of you aware of any other way to do this (perhaps using a payment type)??
    Kindly suggest,
    Regards
    Manjunath

    Hi Manjunath,
    As Brian already explained the way how usually rebate settlements happen with settlement or dummy material.
    Is our business needs to have settlement against actual materials billed ?
    If yes, we did an approach in our client.
    we have a six document concept which is custom developed.
    You have 2 documents created for rebate settlement run. Rebate credit memo request and rebate credit memo for settlement or dummy material maintained in rebate agreement.
    These two documents gets cancelled with corresponding cancellation documents.
    New set of documents created for Rebate credit memo request and rebate credit memo with actual materials.
    All of these documents are created using a batchjob and these documents form document flow in our case.
    You can try with help of an ABAPer for achieving this.
    Thanks
    Rama

  • Error in Tax Code after Creation of Excise Invoice

    Dear All,
    We are using TAXINN Procedure,I have maintained condition records and given the correct tax codes in them for Basic Excise Duty,Secondary Cess and Higher Secondary Cess on the table 357,however after checking the accounting document which is created post creation of excise invoice the wrong tax codes are getting picked up however when i create my commercial invoice and check the tax codes the correct tax codes are coming,please advice what needs to be done to rectify this error.
    Best Regards
    Atul Keshav

    Hi
      If you are using TAXINN procedure, check apart from VK11 check you have maintained TAX CODE for excise condition types. Example FTXP or VK19 (using application as TX). Also check whether you are using UTXJ condition type. If you are using UTXJ condition type then please remove it.
       For TAXINN you need not have UTXJ condition type.
    Regards
    MBS

  • Tax Codes not visible

    Hi all,
    I have just migrated SAP B1 from 2005B to 2007.
    i am having a problem with the tax codes. all the tax codes seems to have migrated. I can see then when I write a query for all the tax codes. but i can only see the 5 basic codes when trying to add the tax codes in the sales order. where have the other tax codes gone? how do i get them to show when i hit tab under the tax codes column?
    another thing is, the excisable column is grayed out when an item is being added into the document. i am unable to make it active in the form settings. how do i get it enabled?
    any help would be appreciated.
    scorp

    Hi Gordon,
    i am still stuck with this problem. the excisable option was not there in the 2005B version, but is present in 2007B (i was seeing the old one in my previous post in the thread). however the option is greyed out.
    how do i make the warehouse excisable? i have many warehouses, is there a way to make all the warehouses excisable in one go? i am talking about 200 warehouses here.
    i need help with this.
    scorp

  • Regarding Error in Tax Codes after Creation of Excise Invoice.

    Dear All,
    We are using TAXINN Procedure,I have maintained condition records and given the correct tax codes in them for Basic Excise Duty,Secondary Cess and Higher Secondary Cess on the table 357,however after checking the accounting document which is created post creation of excise invoice the wrong tax codes are getting picked up however when i create my commercial invoice and check the tax codes the correct tax codes are coming,please advice what needs to be done to rectify this error.
    Best Regards
    Atul Keshav

    This query is now resolved

Maybe you are looking for