PO against Tax condition

Dear Friends,
I have to write one program to find out all service PO against a particular TAX condition eg.JVCD, JVCN etc. That means we have to find out all PO against a Tax Condition Type(eg.JVCD). I have tried using table KONV,KONH,KONP etc. but I am not able to find out the table where I can get Tax Conditions(Taxes applied in a PO) table. Please guide me to solve my problem.

Hi,
Check the tables for tax related Condition Types and get the related KNUMH
A003                           Tax Classification
A053                           Taxes Using Jurisdiction Code
A080                           Taxes: Material
A086                           Taxes: Material, Plant and Origin
A087                           Taxes: Plant, Account Assignment and Origin
A088                           Taxes: Material, Plant, Account Assignment and O
A094                           Taxes: Material, Plant, Origin and Region
Ask your fun consultant, on what basis for taxes the condition record is created, based on that you have to search for these A* tables to get the correct KNUMH.
then pass this KNUMH along with KSCHL to KONP it gives the Correct Tax rates/amounts
reward if useful
regards,
Anji

Similar Messages

Different tax condition value at the time of GR as compared to PO

Hi All,
The issus is as follows ;
We have maintained the tax condition type JIPC (Input Sales Tax) by t-code FV11 as 3% and subsequently created the PO.
But when we are doing GR against the same PO in Accounting Document the GR/IR clearing Account is getting posted with the value of tax 2%(Non deductable tax).
We have checked the validity period of condition type JIPC on day of GR is 3% only.Despite showing the PO screen 3% of non deductable tax accounting document of GR is picking the 2% of tax in GR/IR clearing account.
Thx in advance.
Shiwanshu

Hi Anji ,
   thanks to reply. but my problem is some deffrent. I take an example for that:
I am doing MIGO at this time PO price was 100 , VAT 4% condition JVRD now post this document suppose mat doc is 5900000021.
I will get in my report
Doc no.:5900000021
price   :100
VAT    : 4
Condi: JVRD
now some one make change in this PO like price 150 , VAT 3% condintio JVRN.
if now i will execute my report then i will get.
Doc no.:5900000021
price   :150
VAT    : 3
Condi: JVRN
but i need old data when GR wad post as above.

Error during transfer of tax Condition JIN1

Dear All,
As I create a Sales Order with ref. to Quotation,I get a message in the status Bar mentioned in the Subject line.
Condition type JIN1 is not maintained in the Sales Document Pricing Procedure but mentioned in the Tax procedure.
Detailed Error Description:-
Error during transfer of tax condition JIN1
Message no. VH807
Diagnosis
A condition type is found in the tax determination procedure, which is not available in the current document pricing procedure.
If I see the JIN1 condition Type detail in the sales order,there is an added option in Control data :- X (Inactive via formulae of incorrect).
Kindly suggest.
Best Regards,
Ankur

Check in your pricing procedure, whether you have maintained this condition type. Next check in FTXP whether you have maintained the required percentage against this condition type
Incidentally, if you are in ECC6, condition type for CST is JIN7 and not JIN1 in which case, check in V/07 and select MWST
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Tax conditions in purchase register report

Hi all,
I am developing a Purchase Register Report, I have a small doubt regarding Tax conditions.
From which tables we will get the Tax Conditions like CST, SERVICE TAX, VAT etc.
Previously I have developed Purchase Requisition Report,in that I have used the FM 'CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM' to get the Tax Condition Values. But in this purchase register report I am getting wrong values for the same FM.
Please suggest me.
Regards,
Pradeep.

Hi Pradeep,
First of all let me clarify that you are generating report for Purchase orders generated or for MIRO posted documents
If you are generating for purchase orders
First use FM 'REFRESH_TAX_TABLES' for updating tax tables with latest changes
Next use FM 'FIND_TAX_SPREADSHEET' to find out tax procedure or schema
Then use FM 'CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM' to get taxes
If you are generating report for MIRO documents
Use BSET table for accounting document generated against MIRO
Regards
Krishna

Wrong tax condition base value

Hi,
We are getting wrong tax condition base value if an item having particular combination of inactive condition exclusion items-
we have x abd y condition types which are inactive.
if x is having 0.01 then system is considering y value for tax condition value(it should not because it is inactive). If conditions having other than 0.01(for x), we donot have any problem. (even 0 also we donot have any problem)
Any inputs
chidambaram

Hi
Just check , whether some routines are written against the condition types.
Though inactive , it is picking up the values ,it may be on some per requsite condition.
Regards
KRSNA

Tax Condition not geeting updated

Hi Friends,
I have a problem of tax condition not appearing in the contracts. My condition is based on the combination (IN VK11) of Country/Customer/Material/Pricegroup.
All my masters are maintained, my problem is the field price group in the header level has actually gone blank due to which the condition is not appearing. This field used to get popoulated from the customer master and my customer is up to date. I want to fill in the field with the required data as maintained i the customer master. Can someone please suggest how can I achieve this.
Currently the only option that I see is go in the contract and fill the price gropu field manually. Is there a way to populate this field automatically as I have more than 5000 contract which have been affected.
Please help.
Regards,
Wasim.

Hi
Kindly check the pricing analysis in the order on whoich key combination the tax is coming
and check the routine maintained against the condition type UTXJ in V/08 t code
Regards
Damu

Calculating tax condition amount

Hi all,
I am confused on how the system calculates tax conditon amount (let' say MWST) in sales order. In my system the tax condition type mwst has a condition record maintained of 4% thru VK11 and a tax code V0 assoicated with it.
The base value for calculating the tax amount for mwst is taken from the SD pricing procedure and so the tax amount is calculated in sales order.... However I need to know that in FTXP for the tax code V0, there is a tax rate of 4% maintained against it and an account key mws and a GL account. Is MWST also maintained in FTXP for the relevant tax procedure for 4% ???. I need to know whether for posting to tax GL account for condition type mwst, does the system calculates the tax amount thru tax procedure and if yes then how the system takes the value of BASB (base amount )in tax procedure in FTXP for calculating the tax amount.
regards
sachin

Hi Sachin
Is MWST also maintained in FTXP for the relevant tax procedure for 4% ???. I need to know whether for posting to tax GL account for condition type mwst, does the system calculates the tax amount thru tax procedure and if yes then how the system takes the value of BASB (base amount )in tax procedure in FTXP for calculating the tax amount.
The values maintained in FTXP are just for record purpose. For every Tax we should have a particular GL account, so that we can find the total tax in a period of time whenever required.
But the actual calculation of tax is happening at pricing procedure level only. Tax is calculated based on base price in pricing procedure. Also assigning that amount to GLs assigned against them in VKOA.
Hope this clarify your doubt.

Tax Conditions for Sales and Distribution using Jurisdiction Code in Canada

Hello everyone,
I would like to share with you a doubt relating taxes for Sales and Distribution in Canada.
The Tax conditions for Sales and Distribution in Canada are the CTX1 (GST - Canada), CTX2 (PST - Canada) and CTX3 (Base + GST). These are the Tax Conditions which appear when creating a Material or a Client for the Canada Region, and are also the ones included in the Canada Standandard Pricing Procedure.
I tried to apply the standard method of creating a Master Record for these conditions, but an error relating the Jurisdiction Code came out while releasing to accounting.
Does anyone one how to procceed? Which are the important issues with Finance Accounting to take in to account?
I would really appreciate any comment relating this issue.
Thank you very much in advanced.
Víctor

Dear Mr. Lakshmipathi,
In first place, thank you very much for your quick response.
I have tried many different procedures to get the aim, and among others, a new access sequence was created to allow the introduction of the Jurisdiction Code (UTXJ is not available for Sales Conditions) but once the Condition is created, it is not recognized when creating the Order ("pricing error: Mandatory condition CTX is missing"). Maybe it has something to do with the fact that these conditions are not included in the Finance Accounting Tax Procedure, where the conditions, which represent the same taxes but with different condition names, are defined for a certain Tax Code and Jurisdiction code.
Among the different SAP notes for the error relating the Jurisdiction code, there was one proposing to change the Condition Category from "D" (Taxes) to a value between "1 and 4". By doing this a new error appears while creating the order, saying that there are conditions in the Tax procedure (JRC1, JRC2)which are not included in the Sales Pricing procedure. By including this conditions in the Pricing procedure, the Tax Conditions existing in the Finance Accounting Tax Procedure are brought to the Order Conditions, in addition to the Sales Tax Conditions. And there is something more, each Tax Condition from the Finance Accounting Procedure appears twice, one with the application V (Sales) with value zero, and one with application TX (Taxes) with the value existing in the Finance Accounting Taxes Procedure. This is how at the end, the corresponding %value of the taxes is brought to the Invoice with the correct Tax Code, and the proper Jurisdiction Code, which is different for each condition.
Thank you very much for your time.
Víctor Liedo

Find Tax conditions and amounts while creating a PO from reference.

Hi friends,
I am creating a PO from another reference PO. When I create the PO the Tax conditions and
amounts come from Sabrix 3rd party system. This data gets saved into SAP internal memory and
is visible when we follow PO item-> Invoice Tab->Taxes-->then we can see Tax
conditions and there amounts as well. when we press SAVE button PO gets created and KNUMV
(Condition Number) gets formed and then we can access this Condition types and Amounts data
from KONV table by specifying the Condition number which is the Primary key of KONV table.
But we need to access this data of Condition types and Amounts even before we press SAVe
button on ME21N screen.
Please help me on this.

Hi,
As mentioned that this error was one of the wierdest SAP issues I have faced, it was due to the silliest copy paste errors on my behalf. I completely overlooked the POITEMX naming.
For 4 values of RFQ_NO, RFQ_ITEM, PREQ_NO, PREQ_ITEM, I didnt have the 'X' for POITEMX and kept on looking for errors for days.
BAPI_PO_CREATE1 works with min. possible inputs successfully.
Thanks to all!

Condition value of Tax condition type gets added to Total Value in Contract

Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this.   When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header =   700.00 EUR
                   Material          Outgoing Target val
Item 0010    MAT1               450.00                          ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020    MAT2               150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header =   550.00 EUR
                        MAterial       Outgoing target val
Item 0010         MAT1             450.00                    ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020         MAT2              0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.
Edited by: Venkatesh Gopalarathnam on Jan 24, 2012 9:48 AM

No, i didn't.
Actually, i enter condition type and amount in sales order manually.
At that time my program which i modified at 'Define And Assign Pricing Procedures' in IMG should be run.
But the result of running is different from my purpose.
To change Condition value of condition type in sales order, are there any solution?

How to manual maintain TAX condition value while creating sales order

Hi
I am creating one Tax condition suppose JLST without access sequence .
while creating sales order I am manually maintain the % value of TAX. suppose it is 1%
then I see It show some value in TAX .
save that sales order & creating delivery document for that but when I create Invoice its show error.
" Tax code in procedure CMTAXP is invalid ".
I know the configuration only for Tax condition with vk11 condition record .
BUT now I want to maintain TAX condition at the time of creating sales order.
so I remove the access sequence of that condition .
but It shows tax code error while billing.
My main question is that If i maintain condition record while creating sales order then how i can assign Tax code .
Can it is possible ?
if yes then How?
please help me.
thank you

Hi,
The "straight-forward" answer for Tax Code creation is contact the FI consultant. He shall help you, by creating Tax codes.
I have tested, with creating a tax cond type (copy of MWST) & manually entering values. I can create Sorder, Dlv and Bill but I cannot create an Accounting document. That is because of every line (amount) a Tax code is necessary.
I THINK, you can NOT have manually filled tax codes; access sequence is needed to get the tax value (%) and the Tax code from the condition record.
There is lot of material on the web to understand Tax classification, code etc. etc. See a useful link below -
http://www.sapgeek.net/2010/04/sd-determines-tax-code/
In short Tax code is a must and take the help of your FI consultant for the configuration of the same.
BTW - Tax code is already made created for MWST, therefore I suggested that you can use MWST. Furthermore, you can change the values corresponding to Tax codes in FTXP.
But if you are a beginner in these things, better take help.

How to stop this multiple entry against same condition type in pricing

My client is using manual condition type for the basic price "ZBPR". Now system allowing multiple entry against this condition type in the pricing screen during order creation i.e in the first line if we put ZBPR 00 , in the second line system allowing to put another value against same ZBPR say for example 2000 & doing all subsequent calculations on the basis of 3000 .which is not at all acceptable by my client .Please suggest how to stop this multiple entry against same condition type

You have to make the condition type as Mandatory and not manual.
If you are entering many condition records of the ZPR0 then the latest entry will be taken for further processing for subtotal rebate and total price.
For all the other entered condition records will have yellow traffic signal which is not active.
you can assign a routine with the help pf your abaper...
In the Transaction VOFM define a requirement such that
you condition type takes value only one at the time of order entry.
regards,
Amlan Sarkar

Modify MWST (tax condition) value

Dear All,
I got requirement to modify the value of tax (condition type MWST in Sales Pricing procedure).
Example: base value is 1000, --->tax 10% (automatic by SAP) is 100. However, I want to change this value to 120.
Can I do that, please suggest with the routine or instruction.
Thank you very much,

Hi,
I guess this may be ur requirement..
Go to V/06 select ur condition type MWST under the tab Changes which can be made mark the filed Value if its unmarked..
Now create sales order and u will be able to change the value of MWST cond.type manually..in condtion tab
Reg
JJ

Sales tax condition not picking in p.o

Dear gurus,
I am getting problem of sales tax . Its maintained in tax pricing procedure. I haver maintained condition record for the same in FV11. I am getting all other taxes only sales tax condition is not appering? can any 1 tell about this?

u check whether sales tax condition type is assigned in fvll correctly to the same tax code
u assign the conditon type in excise defaults ( spro>log gen> tax on goods mvmts>india> determine excise duty> maintain excise defaults
and also check the validity periods.
If PO date is not falling with in the validtiy periods then system will not pick the valuye
chris

All tax condition in while billing document insted of Sales order

Hi,
As per our present process for excise and non excise Sales order and any other type of sales order we have created different pricing procedure and sales order type and when we create sales order we can see the tax conditions with amount in sales order only, is it possible to make only one sales order type but intial no tax condition should come in Sales order we want to common sales order type and the we will create different delivery types for different type of order conditions lik eexcise , non ecise etc. and after that when we create the billing document at that time tax condtion should come in the billing document condition with tax amount.
How to configure above.
regards,
zafar

Hi Zkarnalkar,
Have you tried setting pricing requirement #24 for all tax conditions in your pricing procedure?
This is a standard SAP requirement routine that will allow the condition to appear only for Invoices (other than Pro-Forma), Credit/Debit requests, and Returns.
If this is too much, then you can ask your development team to copy this code into a custom requirement routine and adjust as needed.
Best Regards,
Laura

PO against Tax condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for