PO and Payment List - Report

Hi All,
Is there a easy way in SAP to find list of PO's and the payment made to the related vendor for that PO . The payment may be partial or full. I lloked for the transaction code but could not find .
We are  not looking for the customised report.
Your suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Vengal

Hi, In FBL3N select the tab Cleared items & execute, inside just change the layout by (Ctrl + F8) to get the Purchasing Document Nos., If needed save your layout for further usage.
Also you can create a variant for FBL3N as per your selection criteria in main screen.

Similar Messages

  • Check no in Payment List Report (T-Code: S_P99_41000099)

    Hi,
    I had successfully executed the actual payment run with the payment method is C (check) using F110.
    But when I run S_P99_41000099 in the payment list, I cant find check number.
    I tried the choose fields to display more fields, but I cant see check number too.
    How can get the check number display in Payment List?
    Please advise!
    Thanks.

    Resolved by using Check Register

  • Sales Order and Pick List reports will not attach to Email message

    My client wants to email both the Sales Order and Pick List that is created from the Sales Order in the same email message.  It appears that SAP B1 will not do this.  Is this a bug or just the way B1 works.  My client is running version 8.8 PL 19.   Thank you for your help.
    Bill Turek

    Hi Bill,
    Pick List is associated with delivery, not sales order. If you need Pick List be emailed, you have to email delivery.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Adding vendor name to Position part in report Payment List - s_p99_41000099

    HI,
    How can I add Vendor Name to detail level of the Payment List report (transaction s_p99_41000099). Change Layout window allows to add Vendor Name to the header level and Vendor Number to the detail level. Users want to export report into Excel and then sort/filter it by vendor name at the detail level.
    Is there any way to add vendor name to the list of columns available at detail level?
    Thanks in advance.

    Resolved by using Check Register

  • Crystal Report for Sales, Delivery and Payment.

    Hi Guys,
    Need some expert advice over here. Currently, our sales team are using 3 separate report, one report on sales per month for each specific customers, one report on delivered amount per month for specific customers again and the last one report on payment received per month for specific customers as well.
    We have the idea of joining this 3 report so that I can report on sales, delivery and payment all at once so that they can see the trend better. However, after trying for quite a few times, we fail to create a common joining between ORDR, ODLN and ORCT. Is there any possible way to work something out ?
    I have thought of using subreport, but I just cant find the way to plug in the figure correctly.
    Need some advice over there.
    Thank you.
    Best Regards,
    Alex

    Based on what you have told me, then you should then join Sales Order, Delivery, Invoice and Incoming Payments into one.
    The reason I say Invoice table also is because, you cannot directly link Delivery and Incoming Payments window.
    Also you it is not enough that you link the ORDR, ODLN and ORCT, you will need to get the details from RDR1 and DLN1.
    In SAP Business One, each line in SAP Business One can have a different Delivery documnet.
    The TrgetEntry, TargetType will give you this information. For example, if a line for Sales Order has TargetType 15, then TrgetEntry will be the DocEntry in the ODLN. But if it TargetType is 13 it means the Sales order was converted directly to and Invoice and bypassed the creation of Delivery step, which is possible in SAP.
    So here is how I think you will need to link Sales order and Delivery
    RDR1.TrgetEntry INNER JOIN DLN1.DocEntry AND
    RDR1.TargetType INNER JOIN DLN1.ObjType AND
    RDR1.LineNum INNER JOIN DLN1.BaseLine
    Now this could get a little more complicated if you do partial deliveries. For example if a line in your Sales Order has say 10 items and 6 of them are delivered using Delivery Note 123 and the remaining are delivered using Delivery Note 124, then the join will give you 2 different lines.
    So basically you will need to link the tables in this fashion
    ORDR <-> RDR1 <-> DLN1 <-> INV1 <-> RCT2 <-> ORCT
    Unfortunately, this linking process can get complicated if you do not follow certain steps, like for example if you do not create a Delivery Note and converted your Sales order to Invoice. Then the link would be
    ORDR <-> RDR1 <-> INV1 <-> RCT2 <-> ORCT
    I hope I didn't confuse you.
    Krishnan

  • Work Order list report that will includes Damage and Cause codes

    Is there a WO list report that includes fields of the Damage and Cause Codes?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Generally damages and causes  we update in notifications then i think there wont be a list which u r asking
    For notification  the t-code is iw69

  • Error at Outgoing payment  and general ledger report

    Hi Experts,
    I am getting a error while opening Outgoing Payment and General ledger Report, Errors are : "Path Can not be Null, Parameter Name: Path" and "Error code: 100000004, Error: Unknown session" ,respectively.
    These errors are only at a particular client machine.
    Kindly suggest solution.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Ashutosh

    Hi Jambulingam/Suraj,
    I checked the by giving admin rights, also with different user login, but these errors come as and when they want, i have put in this system in observation and wil update this thread accordingly.
    There is no citrix server.
    Thanks for your reply.
    Regards
    Ashutosh

  • Report my ID hacking and payment made

    Hi, I'm one of Skype user. From 9th of this month to 10th there ware several payments had been made without my authorisation. According my bank account and purchase history, I've ordered 5 times of auto-recharges service. But I swear to God, I never ordered that, and the money is pending to withdrawal from my account. And also I couldn't find any credit have charged to my skype account, that means I haven't ordered. Please understand my poor English, I tried to explain this situation as much as I can. I hope I can get the solution of this as soon as possible, and if I want to avoid this kind of scam, what should I do?

    Hi, David_Yoo, and welcome to the Community,
    First things, first: please change your Skype account and payment method account passwords immediately if you have not already done so.  Next, contact your payment method issuer to report and block the processing of the fraudulent payments.  Then, advise skype by contacting customer service directly.
    Here is a link to the instruction on how to contact Skype Customer Service via their secure portal: Contact Customer Service
    As you know you wish to contact Customer Service, skip past Step 2 of the instruction and proceed to Step 3, Continue Support Request. You may also skip past in Step 4 where you will be referred back here to the Community; no need to do this as the Community is where you started!
    Regards,
    Elaine
    Was your question answered? Please click on the Accept as a Solution link so everyone can quickly find what works! Like a post or want to say, "Thank You" - ?? Click on the Kudos button!
    Trustworthy information: Brian Krebs: 3 Basic Rules for Online Safety and Consumer Reports: Guide to Internet Security Online Safety Tip: Change your passwords often!

  • T-codes to get payment run report for different company codes?

    Hello sap gurus,
    I have a scenario like -
    > use of IDocs to process vendor and employee payments. Both bank transfers and checks will be processed through interface.
    Now, What is the t-code to get report for payments for different customer, comp codes and vendor?
    I am new to SAP in testing.
    Appreciate ur help......
    Regards,
    Shamsher
    Edited by: shamsher123 on Jun 4, 2010 11:52 AM

    Hello,
    See the List below hope this will help.
    MIR5 - Display List of Invoice Documents
    S_ALR_87012105 - List of Down Payments Open On Key Date - Vendors
    S_ALR_87012085 - Vendor Payment History with OI Sorted List
    S_P99_41000099 - Payment List
    Prashant Rathore.

  • Duplicate payments in Payment list of F110 payment run

    Hello all,
    We had run APP trhu F110 payment run was as expected with amount 100000 EUR but when we checked payment list (EDIT- Payment - Payment list) there are duplicate entries and total is showing as 200000 EUR.
    Following are onservations
    1) In SAP posting made correctly to all vendors with a total of 100000 EUR. So no double payments posted in vendor account 
    2) Payment list is showing amounts with a doument numbers. Duplicate payments also having document numbers but which are not exists in SAP
    3) Documents posted with doc type ZP in sap is not in serial i.e 1,2,3,4 Its posted like 1,3,5,7... the document no 2,4 can be seen in the payment list
    4) Also I checked log for the payment run and I found one warning message as "Check whether a duplicate payment medium has been created"
    5) Also status of payment run is "Posting orders: 1,174 generated, 605 completed"
    6) I also checked setting in FBZP which is also correct
    We need to correct the DME file with correect postings
    If anyone has faced issue then please share your inputs
    Thanks & regards

    Dear Rajan,
    the payment document validation works as follows:
    If you select this parameter, a form is only printed if the related
    payment document has already been posted.
    Note that it is not advisable to schedule the payment program and the
    data medium programs to run at the same time, if you want the system to
    be able to carry out validation of the payment documents - because the
    system does not start posting the documents at the same time as the
    program runs, and in order to ensure that the payment program generally
    finishes its run before all the payment documents have been posted, the
    payment medium program (started after the payment program) would display
    in the error list any documents that have not (yet) been found.
    As a result double payments are not possible as no payment media is
    created if the payment document is not posted. The items are still
    open and are selected in the next payment run again.
    If the payment document validation is not used, the payment media is
    created but the open item is not cleared as the payment document is
    not posted. In this case you have to clear the open items manually
    (if a repeat update is not possible) to avoid double payments.
    dear Prashant,
    It is normal that if the automatic payment does not pay all the items, You can find them hanging into sm13.
    However, in general, when this happens you could try to use the edit >
    payments > after termination > draw up again option, if it is
    available.  If there is an entry in SM13, as in Your case, you should process it.
    But sometimes the System does not allow to do it.
    Anyway the only problem I can see is the one reported by the note 545340:
    When the payment program is terminated, it may be the case that not all
    payment documents exist on the updated database while the entries
    already exist in the tables REGUH and REGUP. However, this basic
    procedure has the advantage that the payment media can already be
    created for the purpose of fast forwarding to the bank when for example
    the payment documents update is delayed.
    For this problem please refer to the Note 545340 point [4]
    that answers to it.
    Furthermore please be aware that:
    as I told You in the beginning, If the payment program does not pay
    all the invoices contained into the payment proposal, It will depend on
    the fact that during the payment proposal run time and the payment
    proposal time, something changed respect one of the selected invoices.
    This means that one document number was NOT posted even if It is
    contained in the tables REGUH and REGUP.
    Please be informed payment data tables REGU* are used by only payment
    program and no need to take any corrective action and should not be a
    problem with auditors.
    So You can pay the invoices manually or by the next automatic payment
    run without any problem.
    I hope now the System behaviour is more clear.
    Mauri

  • Payment schedule report

    Dear friend,
    i wants to know payment schedule repoprt where
    Sr.No. Project name       Building name           apr-09           may-09        Jun-09     Jul-09      Aug-09
    1      company code            plant name              %                %                %           %           %
    it is a construction company, wants to payment schedule report .
    here each project one company code .
    client wants to see for project (co-code) how much amount expenses. each month (posting period).
    2    Same thing how much received from customer.
    please help me.

    Hello,
    One of the easiest option to see the expenses is laying in FBL1N.
    You only need a nice setting in the selection fields.
    1. Company code
    2. Cleared items: the period you want
    3. Filter only on the Cleared documents
    4. Sort the result into the order of Cleared dates
    You'll get the list of the paid items in date order.
    Export to excel and separate per months.
    Do it for all company cdes.
    REgards,
    Endre

  • Deferred tax: Post invoice and payment separately $1" Message no. DEFTAX020

    while reversing a document thru FB08, it is giving the error message,
    " Deferred tax: Post invoice and payment separately $1" Message no. DEFTAX020.
    This is a stand alone invoice document , without any clearing document.  What is to be done ?
    Below is the snapshot of FB03:-
    Document Number 2256162          Company Code    MLTD         Fiscal Year     2009
    Document Date   24.05.2010       Posting Date    25.05.2010   Period          11
    Reference       PYX/10-11/032    Cross-CC no.
    Currency        INR              Texts exist
    Itm PK  BusA Acct no.   Description                    Tx     Amount in   INR
    001 31  U106 503551     PYXIS SYSTEMS PVT.LTD.         DD             55,150.00-
    002 40  COMM 5656       Membership & Subscri           DD             50,000.00
    003 40       1371       Service Tax Availed            DD              5,000.00
    004 40       1372       Ecess on ST Availed            DD                100.00
    005 40       1373       S&H Ecess on ST Avai           DD                 50.00
    Document Type   I2 VEMDOR INV-CORPORATE
    Doc.Header Text PYXIS SYS.P.LTD.
    Branch number         Number of Pages 0
    Reference       PYX/10-11/032    Document Date   24.05.2010
                                     Posting Date    25.05.2010
    Currency        INR              Posting Period  11 / 2009
    Ref. Transactn  BKPF  Accounting document
    Reference key   0002256162MLTD2009    Log.System MALCLNT999
    Entered by      NITINRB          Parked by
    Entry Date      25.05.2010       Time of Entry   13:05:08
    TCode           FBR2
    Changed on                       Last update
    Ledger Grp                       Ledger
    Ref.key(head) 1                       Ref.key 2

    Hi,
    Check whether OSS note 913805 (see below) offers a solution to your particular issue.
    Kind regards, Robert
    Note 913805 - Error FF891 or DEFTAX025 when posting FI-Documents  Version: 5
    Summary
    Symptom
    The posting of FI-documents cannot be executed due to one of the following error messages:
    FF 890 "Vendor and customer items in document with deferred taxes"
    FF 891 "G/L account item without tax code in document with deferred taxes"
    FF 892 "Error writing to table DEFTAX_ITEM"
    DEFTAX 025 (no specific text)
    Also update terminations and other errors which are related to function group TAX4 may be the topic of this note.
    Other terms
    RFUMSV25; RFUMSV50; VAT; deferred tax; BTE; DEFTAX_ITEM; TAX4; SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC; FI_POST_DEFTAX_ITEM; FF891; FF890; FF892; FF804; 00 671; FF099; DEFTAX020; DEFTAX021; DEFTAX022; DEFTAX023; DEFTAX025; DEFTAX012; DEFTAX_MX027; DEFTAX_MX047; DEFTAX_MX039; DEFTAX; DEFTAX_MX;
    Reason and Prerequisites
    Accidentally some business transaction events (BTE) for the new solution for deferred tax were delivered in an active state in support packages of SAP releases 4.70 and ERP 2004. The solution is available in the SAP-Standard only from release ERP 2005. Also in ERP 2005 the new deferred tax can cause problems in countries for which the solution is not released.
    These BTEs perform strict tests for documents containing tax codes for deferred tax.
    Solution
    If you are using the old deferred tax, i.e. you use report RFUMSV25 to create transfer postings, you can safely deactivate these BTEs.
    Remove the following BTEs:
    00001025  DI-TAX CREATE_DEFTAX_ITEM
    00001030  DI-TAX SET_DEFTAX_ITEM
    00001040  DI-TAX CREATE_DEFTAX_ITEM_REVERS
    00001050  DI-TAX CREATE_DEFTAX_ITEM_MR1M
    In ERP 2005 (ECC 600) the application key is 'FI-TAX' instead of the above mentioned 'DI-TAX'.
    To do this start transaction FIBF
    -> Settings
      -> P/S Modules
        ...of an SAP Application
    Mark the entries from the list above and delete them.
    This deactivates the functionality of 'new deferred tax' for all company codes in all clients on the system. This means that no data is written to table deftax_item at posting time. Report RFUMSV50 can still be started, but it will not process new documents any more.
    If in ERP 2005 problems arise in one country but the new deferred tax is used in another country you must not deactivate the BTEs completely. In this case it is possible to restrict the BTEs to be active only in certain countries using the column 'country' in transaction FIBF.
    Header Data
    Release Status: Released for Customer
    Released on: 16.01.2008  20:12:15
    Master Language: English
    Priority: Correction with medium priority
    Category: Program error
    Primary Component: FI-GL-GL-F Value Added Tax (VAT)
    Affected Releases
    Software Component     Release     From Release   ToRelease     And subsequent
    SAP_APPL                     46C            46C                   46C  
    SAP_APPL                     470            470                    470  
    SAP_APPL                     500            500                    500  
    SAP_APPL                     600            600                    600  
    SAP_APPL                     602            602                    602  
    SAP_APPL                     603            603                    603  
    SAP_APPL                     604            604                    604  
    Related Notes
    771319 - RFUMSV50: Documentation
    Edited by: Robert North on May 26, 2010 11:49 AM
    Edited by: Robert North on May 26, 2010 11:50 AM

  • App Compatibility Submission Fee and Payment Schedule

    We are trying to submit an app for Windows 8.1 compatibility logo.  We login to the dashboard and submit the report created by the App Certification kit.  Next, the web site shows the "Legal Agreements".  We click on the link "Windows
    Certification Program Testing Agreement v1.0".  Section 6a of this agreement reads "Company will pay Microsoft for the amounts due for testing Company Products under this Agreement according to the fee schedule and payment schedule posted at
    the WDC Website and/or Microsoft’s invoices...".  But we could not find this schedule anywhere.  Anybody knows how much this charge will be?  Thanks.

    From the Windows Hardware Certification Program: "...  If you have new or updated drivers, systems, or peripheral hardware that you want available for Windows, then you must certify them..."
    This does not apply to us.  Ours is user app running on Windows 8.1.  Basically we like to have our app listed when search on the page below:
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/compatibility/CompatCenter/Home
    We have done this many times in the past.  We release a new version and need to have it listed there.  The procedure is:
    - Run the App Certification kit get a report with "passed" status
    - Login to https://sysdev.microsoft.com, go to the Dashboard and submit the report.
    - Wait for a while and the program will be listed in the Compatibility Center page.
    We do not see any fee requirements before.  But now the "Legal Agreements" is shown when we try to submit the report. We do not mind paying a fee if it is reasonable. The problem is we don't know what the fee is and cannot find out where it
    is posted. (We believe it is part of the yearly membership fee, but just want to make sure).

  • Open and cancelled Quote Report

    Hi,
    Can anyone give me the information  for getting open and cancelled Quote Report?

    I hope you are using reason for rejection for cancelling quotations. If that is the case, you can use transaction VA25 to view the list of quotations. Here you can filter on two columns status and reason for rejection to view the report as per your requirement.
    Regards,
    GSL.

  • Payment Performance Report

    Dear Experts,
               Following is the scenario,
    Sales Person           Raj
    Customer Code       C1000
    Payment Terms       15 days
    Invoice Date            01.02.2010
    Invoice Value          20000
    Payment Date          20.02.2010
    Payment Amount     20000
    Payment performance  0%
    As the customer has not paid within the credit days, when i execute a query based on the sales person and posting date (From, To) parameters the payment performance should result 0%.
    Is the same possible to generate through query?
    Awaiting your reply
    saravanan
    Edited by: Sanbrahma39 on Feb 16, 2010 1:01 PM

    Dear Gordon,
              As  rightly conveyed the payment performance is calculated based on the (Paidtodate/Doctotal)*100. I tried to generate the report using query
    SELECT T0.[DocNum], T0.[DocDate], T0.[CardName], T0.[DocTotal], T0.[PaidToDate] FROM OINV T0  INNER JOIN OSLP T1 ON T0.SlpCode = T1.SlpCode WHERE T1.[SlpName] = [%0] and  T0.[DocDate] > = [%1] and T0.[DocDate] < = [%2].
    The thing is SAP delivered the result perfectly based on the query given above, now the condition is like the query has to check the payment received within the payment terms, then only it need to consider for payment performance.
    Ex:
    Sales Employee   - Raj
    Customer Code    -C1000
    Payment Terms    -15 days
    IN1 Date                - 01.02.2010
    IN1 Amount          - 10000
    Payment Date      - 14.02.2010
    Payment Amt       - 10000
    IN2 Date              - 02.02.2010
    IN2 Amount        - 40000
    Payment Date     - 19.02.2010
    Payment Amount - 40000
    Now if i try to generate a payment performance report of a sales employee Raj as per my query it would show 100% as payment terms is not been considered.
    I need a query to consider the payment terms also so when i generate a report the payment performance should be 20% only.
    Hope this assists
    Saravanan

Maybe you are looking for